That's not entirely true. Archduke Charles was not allowed to proceed with the battle, because the emperor feared he would become too popular (Napoleon had already offered Charles the crown, which he had declined). And the Austrian army was not destroyed, it was only forced to retreat and fought its way back to Znojmo where the peace treaty was signed. Napoleon was decisively weakened which was of cosequence on the way to Moscow.
Aspern Essling is the first french defeat in a major battle.Archduke Charles could destroy all french troops on the Danube,but he didnt.Napoleon withdraw from Essling and returned with a reinforcement and completly destroyed Austrian army at Vagram.
In 800 years, we won 132 out of 185 wars, lost only 43, and tied 10 giving the French the best record of any country in europe, britain was conquered by romans, then danes, then norwegians, then French, you want proof of the French conquest of engayland, look at the Plantagenet dynasty, angevin dynasty, and the bayeux tapestry. Let's not forget the previous Frank conquest of Germany which included saxony, angeln, and jutland.
French troops are definitely far better than the english ones !!
@townsley2 the romans amd most of the other countries eliminated france too dumbass, count the wars btween the english and the french, the english kicked their ass, napolian, frances only true dignified leader was defeated by the english even though they outnumbered them. ur logic is flawed and needs work, keep working on ur trash talk beacuse one day you could become a politition(and i dont care if i spelled politition wrong)
HAHAHA, Could u speak a single word of French u stupid monolingual brain ???
Ur right lets count the wars : middle age : mostly french victories : Franco-Normans conquered England in 1066, Bouvines in 1214 was like winning a war, so u had to sign the Magna Carta, then the 100 years wars, first half on ur advantage mostly because burguignons were on ur side, second is ours so we trashed u out of France in 1450 = french win.
“There have been 53 major wars in Europe. France had been a belligerent in 49 of them; UK 43.
In 185 battles that France had fought over the past 800 years, their armies had won 132 times, lost 43 times and drawn only 10. Giving the French military the best record of any country in Europe”.
BBC History.
I know, that must be totally unhinging for primary british people...
@townsley2 i havent watched the BBC since i was 5. i get my history from facts. guess wat, the english beat the french multiple times. the french suck
Ur talking about wars, i gave u reliable proof that french won more wars than english, and fucked them more often in the past 1000 years. The only response u have to that is "the french suck" : great job, I'm convinced.
No reliable sources quoted - shit answer - fuck off !!
@townsley2 i was cut short of time so i hate to make it short and sweet, by the way i dont know if u got the message saying that i dont give a shit anymore and that we should both keep our shit to ourselves,:) i really get sick of getting in to these situations because it lasts too long. plus im not a librarian its not my job to quote reliabe sources...........all im going to say from now on when u send me a message is HAVE A GOOD DAY :) :) :) hopefully understand that this is getting boring
@townsley2 All i have to say is i hope u have a good sense of humor because youre on a youtube show called goodgreifing lololololololololol, i really dont care wether you think french troops are better but it was nice messing with you, i hope ur not too pissed, have a nice day :)
@townsley2 first im 17,secong you should look up good griefing cause it exists, and i am also a member, third im only one third american... you need to grow a sense of humor, lastly, if you think about it the english and the french are better than each other in different ways just like everyone else is. france and england both had big empires, they were both fierce fighters, they both won many war, they war bothfeared by everyone, and they both lost thier empires,( this continues)
@townsley2 the one clear advantage that the english has over france is that the countries that used to be in the english empire are still loyal to them, countries such as australia, new zealand, canada, naples, south africa, and india to a cirtain point, for example if england were to go top war with somene most of these countries would come to its aid, and you have to give the english credit, because after all they did have the biggest empire in the world at one point,(continued)
@townsley2 the english deserve as much respects as the french does, even if you do think that french troops are better than the english, because at the end of the day it all comes down to opinion, and please dont send me anymore messages regarding this subject, its starting to get old, have a nice day
@townsley2 i dont know why i bother commenting on videos anymore. from now on, you keep your shit to yourself and Ill keepp my shit to myself, IM tirted of this bullshit, it gets old very quick
HAHAHAH. British cunts like u make me laught so loud !!! You have no clue of History but some few feat of battles for ur desperate english glory !!! Ur education system stops with Waterloo and Azincourt ! That is So funny! ur just concealing hundreds and hundreds of french victories over the english !!!! Hastings, Bouvines, Orléans, Yorktown... are just a few of them !
This is a fine movie of what was apparently an excellent series. The Austrian troops in white here are grenadiers with their bearskins. The regular "Austrian infantry wore Roman-style helmets, but the Hungarian already had shakos like the French.
tbh archduke charles is one hell of an underrated commander....he beat napoleon at aspern esseling and gave him a damn good fight at wagram .. i reckon he is the best commander napoleon faced even better than Arthur wellesley coz lets not forget that wellingtons center at waterloo was on the verge of collapse when the prussians arrived and intervened with their huge force and had blucher been held off by grouchy as napoleon had ordered wellington would have lost
@ag11239 Yes, Archduke Karl (I calll him by his German name) was not only great, his soldiers were great too. They did a fantastic job against the great Napoleon and his fabulous Grande Armee.
@refuckulate420 : NOT! Archduke Karl had reformed the Austrian army and the generals and army responded magnificently. Karl was one of the greatest generals in European history, but Habsburg generals are ignored by most English-speaking military historians. At Wagram, a little over a month later Karl and 120,000 Austrians held of the immortal Napoleon and his magnificent Grande Armee for two whole days, winning the admiration of the great genius thereafter. Vive la France! Vive l'Autriche!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
C'est le premier rôle comique dans lequel C. Clavier ne compose pas et où il m' a vraiment fait rire. Décidément , le chapeau de Napoléon demeure un révélateur de personnalité , à égalité avec l' entonnoir . Serge Lama était plus crédible! Est-ce la proximité du dictateur bouffon Sarkozy qui a révélé ces ambitions historiques chez C. Clavier ? .
It actually took a good few days for Lanees to die. It was gangrene that took him as a result of his leg being shattered. Napoleon cried openly for some time after that. They had been close for many years.
@sk8nmetalpsycho Actually the battle was between the villages of Aspern and Essling. Both armies fought heroically under their great commanders, Napoleon and Archduke Karl von Habsburg. You, mein freund, are from sacred ground, consacrated by those many dead heroes. I wrote the Austrian Kanzler's office in 2008 urging a commemoration on European level of the 200th anniversary, but those mediocres only wanted talk of peace! What about honoring all those European heroes? Shame on them !!
the french were fighting the Austrians led by Archduke Charles (1809) but Napoleon returned later with a much larger army and defeated Archduke Charles and the Austrians at the Battle of Wagram also in 1809
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
they were fighting the voices inside their heads...
there is NO evidence of Napoleon's existance. It's propaganda. My grandFather told me he or any of his friends and family had never ever heard of Napoleon bfr my father went to school and they started spreading this French propaganda BS.
And how do you explain I had family in the Grande Armée ? How do you explain we find back lots of "fosses communes" of dead frenc soldiers (with their uniforms) in Russia, lot's of canon bullets, archives, etc ? So it's not because your grandfather didn't knew one of the greatest generals of all times that he's not existing.
@thedayitriedtodie No evidence? You're an idiot. How about the fact that Napoleon made a lot of the laws and systems that Europe still follows to this day? Are you sure your grandfather wasn't an uneducated idiot? Napoleon was one of the best generals to have ever lived, only to be rivalled by Alexander the Great and Philip II of Macedonia. Napoleon had Europe scared shitless.
et pour les deux qui m'ont mis "-1" je signale que mettre des "?" VEUX dire que je ne comprends pas ce qu'il veux dire, mais pas que je ne partage pas (ce serait fort venant de moi, voir ma chaine...)
Ah je te jure ^^
je signale au passage que Lunius est un ami et un abonné de ma chaine des fois que...
How old is this TV series? And also is it still running?
TheLoneBunghole 5 months ago
@TheLoneBunghole it is a miniserie that was made in 2002
chilliegillie 1 month ago
Vive La FRANCE Vive La République Vive La Liberté xD
laloyaux 5 months ago
his enemies should have hired bob lee swagger (mark wahlberg) and Nap's finished!
thedukeboxx 6 months ago
it's very unrealistic how Napoleon was hit in the thigh and fell from his horse and just stood up as if nothing happened.
thedukeboxx 6 months ago
@thedukeboxx
And it´s not even correct. Napoleon had been wounded during a siege at Regensburg at April 23th 1809 and not at Esslingen.
Sokra01 1 month ago
Vive Coca-Cola!
KittenzKill 8 months ago
From Asterix to Napoleon!!
GothicNight21 8 months ago
That's not entirely true. Archduke Charles was not allowed to proceed with the battle, because the emperor feared he would become too popular (Napoleon had already offered Charles the crown, which he had declined). And the Austrian army was not destroyed, it was only forced to retreat and fought its way back to Znojmo where the peace treaty was signed. Napoleon was decisively weakened which was of cosequence on the way to Moscow.
robnordsieck 8 months ago
Aspern Essling is the first french defeat in a major battle.Archduke Charles could destroy all french troops on the Danube,but he didnt.Napoleon withdraw from Essling and returned with a reinforcement and completly destroyed Austrian army at Vagram.
SuperBradva 9 months ago
In 800 years, we won 132 out of 185 wars, lost only 43, and tied 10 giving the French the best record of any country in europe, britain was conquered by romans, then danes, then norwegians, then French, you want proof of the French conquest of engayland, look at the Plantagenet dynasty, angevin dynasty, and the bayeux tapestry. Let's not forget the previous Frank conquest of Germany which included saxony, angeln, and jutland.
French troops are definitely far better than the english ones !!
townsley2 9 months ago
@townsley2 the romans amd most of the other countries eliminated france too dumbass
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@townsley2 the romans amd most of the other countries eliminated france too dumbass, count the wars btween the english and the french, the english kicked their ass, napolian, frances only true dignified leader was defeated by the english even though they outnumbered them. ur logic is flawed and needs work, keep working on ur trash talk beacuse one day you could become a politition(and i dont care if i spelled politition wrong)
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@olsonsof107
HAHAHA, Could u speak a single word of French u stupid monolingual brain ???
Ur right lets count the wars : middle age : mostly french victories : Franco-Normans conquered England in 1066, Bouvines in 1214 was like winning a war, so u had to sign the Magna Carta, then the 100 years wars, first half on ur advantage mostly because burguignons were on ur side, second is ours so we trashed u out of France in 1450 = french win.
townsley2 9 months ago
@olsonsof107
Then the modern times : Austrian succession war : french win !!
7 years wars (also called french and indian war) = english win.
American Revolutionnary war = french win. (remember USA isn't ur country !!! guess who's to thank)
Napoleonic wars = mostly english wins even those were France against all Europe (u would have done nothing without Prussiens at Waterloo).
Then both country fought side by side. So I'd say it's a draw. with French taking advantage for the middle ages wars.
townsley2 9 months ago
@olsonsof107
So many bullshits in 5 lines ! wow congrats mate.
Let's read what ur BBC history channel says :
“There have been 53 major wars in Europe. France had been a belligerent in 49 of them; UK 43.
In 185 battles that France had fought over the past 800 years, their armies had won 132 times, lost 43 times and drawn only 10. Giving the French military the best record of any country in Europe”.
BBC History.
I know, that must be totally unhinging for primary british people...
townsley2 9 months ago
@townsley2 i havent watched the BBC since i was 5. i get my history from facts. guess wat, the english beat the french multiple times. the french suck
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@olsonsof107
Ur talking about wars, i gave u reliable proof that french won more wars than english, and fucked them more often in the past 1000 years. The only response u have to that is "the french suck" : great job, I'm convinced.
No reliable sources quoted - shit answer - fuck off !!
townsley2 9 months ago
@townsley2 i was cut short of time so i hate to make it short and sweet, by the way i dont know if u got the message saying that i dont give a shit anymore and that we should both keep our shit to ourselves,:) i really get sick of getting in to these situations because it lasts too long. plus im not a librarian its not my job to quote reliabe sources...........all im going to say from now on when u send me a message is HAVE A GOOD DAY :) :) :) hopefully understand that this is getting boring
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@townsley2 All i have to say is i hope u have a good sense of humor because youre on a youtube show called goodgreifing lololololololololol, i really dont care wether you think french troops are better but it was nice messing with you, i hope ur not too pissed, have a nice day :)
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@olsonsof107
Gosh ! I just realize I was trying to argue with a 6 years old dumb american... Stupid me !!
townsley2 9 months ago
@townsley2 first im 17,secong you should look up good griefing cause it exists, and i am also a member, third im only one third american... you need to grow a sense of humor, lastly, if you think about it the english and the french are better than each other in different ways just like everyone else is. france and england both had big empires, they were both fierce fighters, they both won many war, they war bothfeared by everyone, and they both lost thier empires,( this continues)
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@townsley2 the one clear advantage that the english has over france is that the countries that used to be in the english empire are still loyal to them, countries such as australia, new zealand, canada, naples, south africa, and india to a cirtain point, for example if england were to go top war with somene most of these countries would come to its aid, and you have to give the english credit, because after all they did have the biggest empire in the world at one point,(continued)
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@townsley2 the english deserve as much respects as the french does, even if you do think that french troops are better than the english, because at the end of the day it all comes down to opinion, and please dont send me anymore messages regarding this subject, its starting to get old, have a nice day
olsonsof107 9 months ago
@townsley2 i dont know why i bother commenting on videos anymore. from now on, you keep your shit to yourself and Ill keepp my shit to myself, IM tirted of this bullshit, it gets old very quick
olsonsof107 9 months ago
The first defeat of Napoleon on one to one combat.
SuperBradva 9 months ago
And not Do not forget the French marched on Moscow, in ruins, viena, Berlin, and Cairo. The French also took Venice, Rome, Malon, ex, ex, ex.
juanitotnt1 9 months ago
i was amazed by this!
French troops wining something!
Such a shame about Waterloo.
and the peninsula war and trafalgar and agincourt and the battle of the nile and crecy
just off the top of my head.
famous defeats all of them for the french.
zenoist2 10 months ago
@zenoist2
HAHAHAH. British cunts like u make me laught so loud !!! You have no clue of History but some few feat of battles for ur desperate english glory !!! Ur education system stops with Waterloo and Azincourt ! That is So funny! ur just concealing hundreds and hundreds of french victories over the english !!!! Hastings, Bouvines, Orléans, Yorktown... are just a few of them !
Ur education system is so weak !!!
townsley2 9 months ago
Viva uruguaaaay! cuack xD buen video ajja
TheElMANYAcampeon 11 months ago
They just let us show how the french troops are being shot to dead? Nothing happened :s
Spicilus 1 year ago
1:42 - Someone manages to fire a musket that hasn't been primed! I have noticed that the frizzen was not locked nor was the hammer cocked. Fail.
ILOVETHE1700s 1 year ago
This is a fine movie of what was apparently an excellent series. The Austrian troops in white here are grenadiers with their bearskins. The regular "Austrian infantry wore Roman-style helmets, but the Hungarian already had shakos like the French.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 year ago
Excellent presentation.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 year ago
tbh archduke charles is one hell of an underrated commander....he beat napoleon at aspern esseling and gave him a damn good fight at wagram .. i reckon he is the best commander napoleon faced even better than Arthur wellesley coz lets not forget that wellingtons center at waterloo was on the verge of collapse when the prussians arrived and intervened with their huge force and had blucher been held off by grouchy as napoleon had ordered wellington would have lost
ag11239 1 year ago
@ag11239 Yes, Archduke Karl (I calll him by his German name) was not only great, his soldiers were great too. They did a fantastic job against the great Napoleon and his fabulous Grande Armee.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 year ago
Is that gentleman who got his head annihilated supposed to be the valiant Géneral Espagne? What a disgraceful portrayal!
Ismailikov 1 year ago
if Napoleon won moscow in 1815..damn histsroy should of been diffrent
webcamboy15 1 year ago
Rot weiß Rot bis in den Tod !!!
eastendgirl 1 year ago
"Poor French", My arse! They should have stayed at home or killed each other instead!
chrisburchardt 1 year ago
Getting beat by Austrians...what a disgrace.
refuckulate420 1 year ago
@refuckulate420 : NOT! Archduke Karl had reformed the Austrian army and the generals and army responded magnificently. Karl was one of the greatest generals in European history, but Habsburg generals are ignored by most English-speaking military historians. At Wagram, a little over a month later Karl and 120,000 Austrians held of the immortal Napoleon and his magnificent Grande Armee for two whole days, winning the admiration of the great genius thereafter. Vive la France! Vive l'Autriche!
FRAGIORGIO1 1 year ago
@FRAGIORGIO1
Fuck Austria :).
refuckulate420 1 year ago
2:55 God that's one unlucky fellow!
ViccardXViccc 1 year ago
2:57 LOL
DutchPetriot 1 year ago
I've watched this 4 times in English
French is next.
DuPuieproductions 1 year ago
2:42 damn! that guy looks like me!
Norguy77 1 year ago
Napoleon walks well with a bullet in his leg.
hoosieryank1967 1 year ago
@hoosieryank1967 no kidding
thepyroboy123 1 year ago
bonjouir je mapple Andrew
12andrewrules 1 year ago
who are the guys in black?
Rico8458 1 year ago
@Rico8458 French troops in greatcoats.
FRAGIORGIO1 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
C'est le premier rôle comique dans lequel C. Clavier ne compose pas et où il m' a vraiment fait rire. Décidément , le chapeau de Napoléon demeure un révélateur de personnalité , à égalité avec l' entonnoir . Serge Lama était plus crédible! Est-ce la proximité du dictateur bouffon Sarkozy qui a révélé ces ambitions historiques chez C. Clavier ? .
BOOOZB 1 year ago
jfhfjhdhfjdhc
soultana73 2 years ago
watch this potop 29(!!) if you like battles
Juniorpil 2 years ago
No evidence? lol there are just 1 billon of envidence french propaganda?
oh my god so STUPID!
If it's propaganda why the french choose to loose the battle of waterloo?
plz be honest with History.
MrOrizon 2 years ago
I agree what he said was pretty dumb
matta173 2 years ago
It actually took a good few days for Lanees to die. It was gangrene that took him as a result of his leg being shattered. Napoleon cried openly for some time after that. They had been close for many years.
marshal3corps 2 years ago 2
laggy
Tonoba 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
jajajaja........me rio yo de Napoleón y de Francia.........pobre ombecila por cierto
gonesparta 2 years ago
i come from essling and i dont think they made the video there..
sk8nmetalpsycho 2 years ago 2
@sk8nmetalpsycho Actually the battle was between the villages of Aspern and Essling. Both armies fought heroically under their great commanders, Napoleon and Archduke Karl von Habsburg. You, mein freund, are from sacred ground, consacrated by those many dead heroes. I wrote the Austrian Kanzler's office in 2008 urging a commemoration on European level of the 200th anniversary, but those mediocres only wanted talk of peace! What about honoring all those European heroes? Shame on them !!
FRAGIORGIO1 1 year ago
Vive L'Maréchal Lannes!!!!!
AthaNapo1994 2 years ago 6
the guy who lost his leg is Lannes, right?
T1000579 2 years ago
Yes its Maréchal Lannes
tipitjo 2 years ago
Comment removed
Killerjsa 2 years ago
who were they fighting here?
SupaTROopa2 2 years ago
the french were fighting the Austrians led by Archduke Charles (1809) but Napoleon returned later with a much larger army and defeated Archduke Charles and the Austrians at the Battle of Wagram also in 1809
volksmarschall 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they were fighting the voices inside their heads...
there is NO evidence of Napoleon's existance. It's propaganda. My grandFather told me he or any of his friends and family had never ever heard of Napoleon bfr my father went to school and they started spreading this French propaganda BS.
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
i dont no about that
SupaTROopa2 2 years ago
And how do you explain I had family in the Grande Armée ? How do you explain we find back lots of "fosses communes" of dead frenc soldiers (with their uniforms) in Russia, lot's of canon bullets, archives, etc ? So it's not because your grandfather didn't knew one of the greatest generals of all times that he's not existing.
Killerjsa 2 years ago
looool poor QI ahahaha
SPECTRAL95 2 years ago
yes, i must agree, SPECTRAL95 is clueless... bottom QI..
thedayitriedtodie 2 years ago
lol!!! is this guy serious??? X-D
garythegit 2 years ago
@thedayitriedtodie No evidence? You're an idiot. How about the fact that Napoleon made a lot of the laws and systems that Europe still follows to this day? Are you sure your grandfather wasn't an uneducated idiot? Napoleon was one of the best generals to have ever lived, only to be rivalled by Alexander the Great and Philip II of Macedonia. Napoleon had Europe scared shitless.
Alexandros1294 1 year ago 3
Pauvre Lannes
au moin sa mémoire sera vengé par Wagram
tipitjo 3 years ago 3
poor french...vive la france!!!!
echo123france 3 years ago 16
Vive l'Empereur!
darsh9999 3 years ago 37
@darsh9999 Vive Wellington!
DavBlc7 8 months ago
@DavBlc7 Who ?
MaxRWF 5 months ago
Poor hussar...
TroupeDeMarine 3 years ago 2
????
cumbas 3 years ago
The one who lost his head to the cannonball--the hussar.
IuniusPalladius 3 years ago
ah OK ;-)
et pour les deux qui m'ont mis "-1" je signale que mettre des "?" VEUX dire que je ne comprends pas ce qu'il veux dire, mais pas que je ne partage pas (ce serait fort venant de moi, voir ma chaine...)
Ah je te jure ^^
je signale au passage que Lunius est un ami et un abonné de ma chaine des fois que...
cumbas 3 years ago