For all the people that believe a plane hit - Why was there no damage from where the turbines would have hit? These aircraft were loaded with jet fuel - Why was there next to no heat damage to the floors on the left side of the impact? These things just don't add up.
That day, for the first time in recorded history, two jet aircraft vaporised on impact...one with the ground in Virginia, the other at the Pentagon.
The wall is there, look more carefully at the simulation. The question you should ask is why didn't the fully fueled wings leave any *fuel* outside the walls.
The original version of the video did, indeed, talk about 9/11. They changed it to discuss their software, very likely under some kind of pressure.
they basically are, the truth is, that not only the damage doesn't resemble a jetliner crash, but the fact alone, that this jet flew this low, and fast is so far fetched. No plane hit the Pentagon period.
this video pretends the concrete wall wasnt there in an attempt to hide the fact that the wings would have snapped off and remained outside the building
Actually, this video SHOWS how much visible damage should have remained after the crash.
I think Purdue must've been squeezed, because I recall a different video with commentary using this simulation where the whole idea was to disprove the administrations claim it was any kind of passenger liner that hit the pentagon.
This is something wrong with this simulation. The outer wall is invisible. Meaing the wing's never touch the outer wall, they go through them using majic. Must be glitch in the matrix? or mabe a plane never the pentagon.
This has been flagged as spam show
For all the people that believe a plane hit - Why was there no damage from where the turbines would have hit? These aircraft were loaded with jet fuel - Why was there next to no heat damage to the floors on the left side of the impact? These things just don't add up.
TaZ101SAGA 5 months ago
Comment removed
TaZ101SAGA 5 months ago
somebody forgot to explain the exit hole after three buildings, but somebody remembered to make the enginees disappear on the simulation.
MrDuspaghi 8 months ago
thank you God that most of the people are not stupid.
croeagle100 1 year ago
In response to most of the commenters:
That day, for the first time in recorded history, two jet aircraft vaporised on impact...one with the ground in Virginia, the other at the Pentagon.
The wall is there, look more carefully at the simulation. The question you should ask is why didn't the fully fueled wings leave any *fuel* outside the walls.
The original version of the video did, indeed, talk about 9/11. They changed it to discuss their software, very likely under some kind of pressure.
kinaydjin 1 year ago 2
Well, there's the proof it wasn't a plane.
AlmightyJerk 1 year ago
no need to include c ring punch out.
UNTC321 2 years ago
Note in the animation, the right wing engine misses the generator.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Actually Flight 77 and 93 were both Boeing 757s, but basically the same aircraft, in size, etc.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
Great vids, but there one big problem.
The simulate show ving crashed pentagon without engine??
I supose those engine would do HEAVILY damage than the vings.
This simulate is waste of time and it not a evidence at all because you haven't included two engine.
trying to fool us??
koford 3 years ago
they basically are, the truth is, that not only the damage doesn't resemble a jetliner crash, but the fact alone, that this jet flew this low, and fast is so far fetched. No plane hit the Pentagon period.
Airportchris2 3 years ago
@Airportchris2 How do you know what the damage would look like?
PantzMaster76 1 year ago
@PantzMaster76 Of course u do except heavily damage from those two engine wouldn't you? And this simulate doesn't show *any* engine damage.
koford 1 year ago
@PantzMaster76 Ummm, common sense?
Airportchris2 1 year ago
@koford How do you know what the damage would look like?
PantzMaster76 1 year ago
@PantzMaster76 It's not so much of what, it would look like. But the fact that it, isn't there at all.
AlmightyJerk 1 year ago
this video pretends the concrete wall wasnt there in an attempt to hide the fact that the wings would have snapped off and remained outside the building
BettieRazorblade 4 years ago
Actually, this video SHOWS how much visible damage should have remained after the crash.
I think Purdue must've been squeezed, because I recall a different video with commentary using this simulation where the whole idea was to disprove the administrations claim it was any kind of passenger liner that hit the pentagon.
kinaydjin 3 years ago
Its all bullshit, don't be fooled, Uncle Sam is raping are ass's and laughing about it!
The government was be every aspect of what happend!
TheCRONICles 4 years ago
This is something wrong with this simulation. The outer wall is invisible. Meaing the wing's never touch the outer wall, they go through them using majic. Must be glitch in the matrix? or mabe a plane never the pentagon.
AngelofJustice777 4 years ago
simulation matches to the damage shown at 2:26. No holes where the engines went through, just like in the simulation there's no engines.
RichieSmooth 4 years ago