Maybe the last piece of the puzzle.

[Hazelnut2448]

i cant handle this dudes ppl, speaking, or breathing skills any longer for fear of losing iq in the procces....

[SALESPRODUCTIONS]

Did you skip your meds today ?

[greenearthnazi20204u]

free energy is easy you are driving your self crazy over think it .the big problem is. once you know free energy how to get it out with out getting killed ,starting ,no big wars, or destroying the money system on earth. you tell how me how and i can show you free energy . what do you say ?

[HYPRKLSTRKMPLX]

no lights? no music?

[bsmagouyrk]

Beuler....Beuler.....Beuler...­.

[LiamXaoh]

I want my 5:13 back! What a waste of video.

[arra55]

dang i can understand this so space lol

[sparkyrocky12131963]

this is a good video explanation

sincerely Mylow's brother.

[bachhell]

Why do I feel like my brain has been raped?

[balgeshaftal]

wow..

[Me102288]

this is the basis of permmanent manget alternators ! he may be on to something. permanent magnet alternators put out more energy at less torque because there is no cogging.

[kirkey99]

@Me102288

If: Output Energy > Input Energy, then what is the source of the difference in Energy: Output - Input?

[Me102288]

@kirkey99 there is no excess, but an alternater on an engine produces energy while its spinning.. it always produces electricity for radio, lights... so with that its not a mater of if we get more then or less then, Its a matter if we can break even, which the whole process works well to replace some gasoline with hho.. and the ppl thinking it cant 'boost" fuel mileage dont even understand adding an accelerant to any fuel = more combustion with less fuel.. thus less gasoline for same mileage :-)

[kirkey99]

@Me102288 My mistake. For some reason I thought it was another "free energy" concept.

[Me102288]

@kirkey99 it will go over unity if thats what you mean, just givin the factor u can you the same water over and over, and it takes less electricity to make the it produces in a contained explosion, but not enough to bother with given engines arent effecient enough :-\ so you'd end up with 103% productive and every 2 years of constant running you gotta do maintenance to whole thing..theres your 103% + back down to 99.9999999% :-( saying might be true.. ya cant get something for nothing :-\

[Xcerca]

garbage

[saraboone2012]

This is B.S.

[mr1000rx]

U.O.ME 5mins of my life back. LOL

[mugwamp4]

possibly the most useless video on utube

[TeaBagger5000]

A 5 minute video of an experiment of a wheel with a few weights mounted on it and a technical observation showing me how it balances itself. Your such a nerd!

[andurilfromnarsil]

WARNING! INCORRECT STATEMENT OF THERMODYNAMIC LAW IN ABOVE VIDEO! Okay, now that I've got that off my chest, here is the correct version of what you were trying to say: no process is possible whose SOLE result is the transfer of heat from a cooler to a hotter body.

Also, from wikipedia: "Heat doesn't flow from cold to hot (without work input)."

In the case of the refrigerator, the compressor does that work. Adding evaporation in no way breaks thermodynamics.

[Manoo62]

You hung a weight on a metal bar....what the hell do you think that proves you idiot.

[fenderflipper]

@Manoo62 You didn't listen to anything he said did you.

[SuperPolaken]

??????????????????????????????­?????????????????

[WinshieldWiper]

@henrykay01 you are never, ever going to get that money. I guarantee you. Sorry.

[daenumen]

the mass does not apply torque, its a turning moment.

do you know what homopolar theory is regarding? because its a long way off this.

again torque is a force, not a forcexdistance.

yes energy must be conserved, and refridgerators work by extraction of heat from a cold body to a hot one. so much for you paying attention in thermodynamics, where in a refridgerator, you use a compressor to work on the system and cool it.

[juggernautxtr]

@daenumen

actually if you knew anything about fridgeration you'd know that is not cooling it is heating. till you are below a certian temp.

why it is called air conditioning not air cooling.

[daenumen]

1. fridgeration isnt a word

2. air condtioning refers to a marketed utlity that the user can alter the condition of the air, ie hot or cool, hence the system is not called an air cooling system because it can also 'warm; the air.

if 'fridgeration' is heating until you are below a certain temp, do you not think that it would be a pointless invention? ie, having to cool it down before you can cool it down? does that make sense to you?

[juggernautxtr]

i suggest you go look it up befor you go spouting off at the mouth of something you have no clue about.

[daenumen]

well considering i lecture on the topic, i think im well read enough.

look its quite a simple system, take a look at your refrigerator.

the rail at the back - heat out

inside the fridge (dont let the door close on you) - source of the heat.

will not operate at high temperatures because the compressor will burn out, primary failure of a refridgerator, other than seal failure, though usually much much rarer.

go learn how to speak english before telling me about science, imbecile.

[LOLDISNEYLAND]

yeah torque is essentially a rotational force. Work is force multiplied by distance. What he is demonstrating here is rather simple and the same as frictional counterforce on a moment. If the bearing (a rusty one :) ) has the same counter force as the gravitational force vector or torque due to the steel weight, both forces will cancel out and the system is in balance. This is high school physics and this demo doesn't prove anything groundbreaking even in the slightest. lol

[daenumen]

NO!

torque is a vectoral depiction of the force of a rotating body.

work is force intergrated by the distance parallel to the force.

A rusty baring has a frictional force that is parrallel to all surfaces of the bearing, primarily perpendicular to the axle. only one small component will be cancelled by gravity, and the opposing force will be aided by gravity.

[daenumen]

@LOLDISNEYLAND

think of a catherine wheel, the rockets are friction, that slow the wheel ONLY WHEN YOU HAVE SPUN IT COUNTER CLOCKWISE BEFORE LIGHTING THE ROCKETS.

here there is a turning moment, and this is overpowered by the magnetic attraction, acting as a frictional force. TURNING MOMENT IS NOT A TORQUE UNLESS BODY IS IN MOTION!!!

the system is in equilibrium, and a slight displacement will result in moving back to the equilibrium position.

this vid producer is an idiot.

[LiamXaoh]

@daenumen - wrong. Torque is measured as force x distance that is why it is quoted as Nm (N= force, m = meters) or Ft.lbs (Ft = foot, lbs = pounds).

[daenumen]

go and look on wikipedia, they are vectors, and Torque denoted Tau, is determined by the cross product of the r and v vectors. have you heard of vector calculus??

[LiamXaoh]

@daenumen - I don't normally use Wiki but even it has a definition for torque, and I quote: "The magnitude of torque depends on three quantities: First, the force applied; second, the length of the lever arm[4] connecting the axis to the point of force application; and third, the angle between the two. "

From my physics book: "Torque is calculated by multiplying Force and distance, so the SI units of torque are newton-meters, or N*m:

Thus my case is proven.

[daenumen]

@LiamXaoh

ok.

[daenumen]

im going to comment twice on this, because i cannot believe you have been so foolish as to define an equation by the units

take this as an example

c= 2(pi)r, the units of c and r are in say metres, but there is a conversion factor!!!

dont tell me what is right and wrong, go to school first and ' learn yourself some basic education.'

[LiamXaoh]

@daenumen - you are such an arrogant prick the way you respond. This is not the forum to show everyone how you can be a prat but the forum to exchange information. So fuck off and learn to be nice in future.

[daenumen]

@LiamXaoh

thankyou for exchanging that information with me, aswell as the units of Torque.

[chrisofnottingham]

Torque and movement are two different things.

Also, magnetism has confusing shaped fields and properties but it is (at best) a conservative field, like gravity. What you are trying to do is the equivalent of make a roller coaster ride that runs forever with no power source.

You can build parts of the ride and it will run itself. Other parts even have sections where it climb up slopes. But when you connect it up it always needs an energy input to run it.

[marsL001]

why not wait for the second video and then air them together,.............just a thought

[spikeychops]

This is a work in progress, that's why he's releasing the work incrementally.

[jozsefboviz]

fucking boring shit. don't be a scool teacher! kids will hate u. get fuckt. last piace of puzzle. u don't ewen know what do u talking about. dumbd fuck

[spikeychops]

Yeah..we can easily see that you and teachers haven't exactly been on the same page, eh mate? Before you start slagging off those that are endeavouring (that means trying BTW), to inform and educate people, maybe you'd be more convincing if you could show you'd learned how to spell and punctuate..

[mbudd121]

thanks for this really long boring video.

[spikeychops]

What? Tied to your chair and forced to watch it were you?

[silverpizza100]

you are a freaking idiot! get a life

[X00000013]

go linear, good luck

[Manitobah]

Please Post that video, I know you are taking a step by step approch but I want to see it work soooo bad!