I went to your profile and got to know that you are 23. Sorry, I shouldn't have done that I thought you must be in your 40s, according to the way you comment. Ape rate podi malliyekne. Sorry malla, hope you are doing your studies in Aussie. Good luck. I would have never comment like that if I knew your age. GOOD LUCK again. So happy to see your interest on Sri Lanka.
I am apologizing from you, because as I mentioned earlier even before,
not accepting mistakes, talking about what you don't know, make judgments hurriedly, making assumption on things with less knowledge (I used the word less not without), aggression.
All are characteristics of YOUTH. You have shown what you are. I wouldn't have give much of an attention for them, if I knew your age. Remember I am a person who works with Adolescence and Youth. All the very best in your future endeavors.
@Rajadahana No need to apologize or feel bad. BTW I still think the Gov shd privatise (Partial ownership) many institutions like Sri Lankan airlines, Elec board, Railway etc..I don't consider it as selling public assets. It's a long term investment. Ease the pressure on the Gov if they do the right thing. Avoid monopoly and set rules n regulations. That's all I have to say. BYE>>>>
I still can remember how I saw the world or interpret the world when I was 23. Yes I agree with you. you are a genius and I am an idiot. Totally agree with you due to the reasons I mentioned earlier. If you say privatization is good, yes, then it is good. No body can challenge that, specially through a very poor communication media such as youtube comments.
Privatization itself cannot harm any one. It is just another concept. It is the implementation what matters.
It is like a knife. Knife has nothing wrong itself. But it can be used either to cut beans or a neck as well. Sri Lanka is not the best conducive environment when it comes for implementing privatization..
@Rajadahana My point was, privatisation is another concept and needs to be done better and needs to be transparent so the public can be assured that they will receive something better for what is being sold. Higher productivity and efficiency. DCSL, Sri Lankan, SLT, LECO, CHICO are landmark successes in privatisation. It's abt the way we look at it and use it. Like ur example, use the knife for beans not for necks wisely. It's abt the person who handles it.
I will tell you a story. My mothers sister worked in ORUWALA WANE, when it was privatized. When the discussion went on with the government a huge strike came up. Any how the privatization was done. What was the new company did. They sacked all the stickers. Then they didn't recruit people for them. They could start the operations because it was over staffed before. was the recruiting of excessive staff to WANE SANSTAWA a management decision? No, it was a political decision.
@Rajadahana Privatising ORUWALA WANE to CHICO was a good decision to me bcoz of the reason you pointed out. There's a limit of staff that a company can handle in order to operate efficiently. If the balance is lost due to any reason (Could be a political decision to over staff), that organisation won't last. Man power was equalised by sacking extra staff by the company which is fair enough (Not unfair dismissal). I hope they got some compensation or ETF after all.
I will ask you a question, what do you think, or what is your opinion about the board of directors or the management, when WANE SANSTAWA is under the state? Were those top people in the WANE SANSTHAWA efficient or inefficient?
That is one. Secondly the privatizing process was not a 100% decision of the government. What happened was, the company representatives came to SL, accessed the potential of WANEE SANSTAWA, and they got to know that it is huge, then they influence the government to do that. Government people are also sell themselves to anything if the benefits are up to their limit. So deal got approved easily.
Thirdly, then the new management said to the staff who left that they will provide all the necessary iron, if they want to do any construction in their houses. I think the management did that for one year. What did that means, even at that time without any renovations WANE SANSTHAWA had the capacity to do something like that.
@Rajadahana That was like a compensation act to me. If they terminated the employment and if it's not done due to a serious offence, the organisation shd pay compensation. We call it redundancy here. Ofcourse they have the capacity for that and they get ready for that part and I'm sure it's included in the deal.
@Rajadahana If the efficiency was there, they wouldn't have hired more staff members just bcoz the minister said to do so. They shd have used ur thinking of 'We have to stand up against this politicians to stop over filling the organisation". Nobody did that. I'm sure the management itself playing as political henchmen. They can't go against it but to support it and they will do anything to keep their jobs. Who's the chairman back then? Must be a political henchmen. I call that poor managment
Hey Malli, After some time. I will give you a broader angle of the difference of the state owned enterprises and a private ownership. That is state owned are supposed to take decision for the benefits of the community, private ownership is trying only to maximize profits. Their CSR programmes are also used to image building which helps them to achieve more profits in the long run.
@Rajadahana This is how I feel the situation in Sri Lanka..State owned are supposed to take decisions for the community but they only take decisions to support the minister wasting billions of our tax money. Only they benefit. Private companies maximize their profit by having a good management system which serves the community indirectly. State organisations are supposed to serve the community but it doesn't mean we have to loose billions at the end. That's a non-profitable charity programme
Exactly my point. Again and Again I have to say is, it is the problem with the minister (Politician, or the politicization), not with the organization or of the management. Private companies act like mad dogs in countries like ours which doesn't have proper rules and regulation. So what to do to regulate them? Who is having the power of making decisions. Once again it comes back to the same place like a boomerang (you must be knowing on that than me).
@Rajadahana I don't get ur point. If the management is controlled by a corrupted minister why do u say it's not the problem of the management? Management takes decisions to satisfy the ministers needs. They r willing to waste billions of our tax money to do that coz it's OUR money. But private companies take decisions to save THEIR money n maximize the profits. To maximise profits u have to give a better service. So they end up giving a good service to the community. It's abt OUR and THEIR money
Sorry I didn't clarify that. I referred management as the people who are below the politicians level. Please correct your assumption that government servants are trying to take decisions to satisfy ministers. There are only very few like that and those are the few people who get benefited by those decisions. Most of others do these against their conscious. If they talk or act according to their conscious, they will loose their job in the very next day.
@Rajadahana Haha u reached the point where I wanted to u to reach. Only few genuine hard working Gov servants r there and they will never stand against these corrupted officials in order to protect their jobs. They can work hard but at the end everything goes down the drain. That's why these institutions loose billions. It's not an assumption. It's the fact. I don't think a few corrupted workers can over run too many efficient hard working workers. So I would say, it's the other way around. .
The helicopters (the pilots in this case) were used to transport thamil selvam at the ceasefire time, were used also to crush LTTE, last year. Air force is one state owned institution. Is the commander of the Air force responsible for those two scenarios? It was political decisions. What matters most is not the efficiency of the government servant, it is the decisions of the politician. Who should be changed, Air force commander or defense minister?
@Rajadahana Again, majority of the ppl want to keep the defence minister not the air force commander. Ppl love this corrupted system. They just simply look at what they got and what will they get from the Gov. They don't think abt the future of this country. They can be bought for a packet of rice or with impressive promises. Since u and myself can't change the system, we'll see a corrupted country forever. Poor country with a powerful president.. Sounds bit like Zimbabwe
Identifying what is to be corrected here is very crucial. Is it the management of the organization or this bad system? Malli, I will give you a classic example.
Nigeria has oil. But more than 95% of them are exported by private companies. So what is the end result? Local oil price in Nigeria is one of the highest in the continent. If you can find the book "confession of an economic hit man", read it, you'll be informed more on what really is happening around the globe.
@Rajadahana To be honest I dunno the problems in Nigeria. I can give u whole bunch of examples in Aus how private companies run the country providing the best service to the public. 90% of the organisations r privatised here including transport, postal, banks, car manufacturers, telecommunication, utilities etc.Also less politicians to handle issues coz they have less departments to deal with. Politicians fool ppl using the line "We have to protect our national assets". Assets to them actually
Why do you think the same privatization concept has failed in Nigeria, while it is successful in AUS from the people's perspective. The companies are regulated by a consistent set of rules. So how do you think about Sri Lanka is it more inclined towards Nigeria or AUS when it comes to set of consistent rules?
Onetime I was thrilled to hear about MIT, a world class company owned by a Sri lankan. What happened to it? It was bought over by british stock exchange. Have these external forces allowed us to develop a private sector in SL. No. I don't favour state owned institutions without reasons and facts, there are very many. If you send your email, I will be able to explain it properly. But I assure you, it would be a long email.
@Rajadahana I don't like state owned institutions coz they chew up our tax money to satisfy a politician without serving the community. Everyone knows how we get served if u go to a Gov institution coz they simply don't care. Private companies do NOT chew our tax money and politicians can't poke their fingers in. They will provide a good service to the community in order to maximize their profit. Above all, it's the Gov that shd be controlling these companies with rules and regulations. Period
i totally agree with you on the inefficiency of the state owned institutions. No argument at all, on that. What you are saying is right, the eating of tax money is clearly visible when it comes to state owned institutions, but one has to be more alert to identify the invisible enemy.
@Rajadahana The real enemy is the attitude and the uneducated level of our ppl. NODANNA YAKATA WADA DANNA YAKA HODAI kiyana logic ekata MR ta chande dunnu un dan hithanawa athi nodanna yaka hodai kiyala. So the invisible enemy can be turned into a visible friend if we do the job wisely. The question is, is there anyone who can come forward to do that ? No coz they wanna see a tmr. That's how the system works. I challenged u to change that coz majority of our ppl want that system.
The way the privatization was done in SL by both SLFP and UNP are wrong. It is useless to privatize our state owned institutions without making the necessary set of rules and regulations. In the UNP 2 years era, they didn't show any interest to strengthen the regulations. If they did so, I would have totallyGREEN by now. They didn't show any intent of doing so. Do you know UNP reduced the tax of a betting center per month from Rs. 30,000/- to Rs 3,000/-. I don't get it???
@Rajadahana Some of them were done wrongly and some of them were done correctly like Sri Lankan, LECO, SLT..Current Gov has no interest in privatising any institute or strengthening regulations. They just let it chew money which is even worst. What's the big deal in reducing tax in betting centres?? It's a business. It's the same as reducing the luxury vehicle tax by 50% now. What do u think abt giving more liquor licenses?? Importing more liquor??Increased tax on essential consumer products??
I have to say some thing on Sri lankan. The minister of civil aviation, when air lanka was privatized was late, Mr. Dharmasiri Senanayake. But he didn't know that the agreement was signed. The funny thing was his signature was in the agreement, even though he got to know after that. So the deal was not transparent. Do you know Air Lanka had routes which emirates couldn't acquire. So Emirates used Air lanka routes to send emirates flights after privatization.
@Rajadahana Who cares abt routes or ministers signature as long as it provides a good service to our ppl. Don't forget the fact they have also made Sri Lankan the best airline in Asia twice. Like I said, don't look for small things like routes and signatures. look at what's beneficial to us in long term. I guess u know the reason why emirates didn't extend their contract and left the country thanks to MR. Do u know that ground staff had to pull flights for taxing after they left?
Economically, privatizing state monopolies is a malpractice. Sri Lankan is one good example. Sri Lankan increased the service levels, I do agree. But Air Lanka had more prestige in the international aviation arena than Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan couldn't achieve that even in the last year. Simply because one cannot make a prestigious image in the level of Air Lanka within a decade. (the root goes till AIR CEYLON)
@Rajadahana I don't agree that Sri Lankan airlines didn't make a prestigious image. Prestigious image can't be bought overnight. It takes years. I've travelled on Sri Lankan when it was under the emirates management and when it's under the current Gov management. I see a huge difference in service. Emirates invested money and I'm sure they don't wanna loose their image as a code share partner and as an airline alliance. Sri Lankan couldn't achieve anything after Emirates left. Yes I agree
Malli I am emphasizing this for the second time. I am using the word politicians or politicizing, for all the politicians. not SLFP or UNP alone. So it is no use of talking on MR or any other particular politician with me in here. I was referring the forces around our country as unseen enemy, neither MR nor RW. Again I am not bias on MR or RW. Remember, through out the history, societies were changed by few who lead and rest following. It may be difficult but not IMPOSSIBLE.
@Rajadahana We r talking abt the current situation in SL. That's why the current politicians come to the play. I suppose we have to correct the mistakes we've done in the past to make it better for the future. But now it's going backwards. Yeah it's not impossible..I'm just thinking when it's gonna be possible??? In 100 years??? When we reach the stage of Zimbabwe???U r just believing the Gov propaganda on International forces. It's just a reason they made up to fool ppl. Don't be fooled mate
Don't try to judge me. You made several mistakes when trying to do so. Sales rep, union leader etc. Again you made such a mistake. I very rarely watch ITN news. What government propaganda says is all the western world is trying to massacre us. But GOSL stands in between as a shield and protects all Sri lankans. (laugh)
But what I am saying is those international forces are there against all the countries like us. That is totally different. So don't quickly make a decision on me.
@Rajadahana Haha I was joking abt sales rep n union leader thingy. I also said u r a political henchmen coz u were acting like one. I never said u watch ITN news. R u telling me that ITN news spread Gov propaganda around the country?? Well u picked it right. Our own politicians are against us and our future. So don't worry abt this hypothetical International forces when u can see the real local phantom in action right before ur eyes.
@Rajadahana What happened to u??? Were u arrested like SF when trying to rectify the Gov ??? Haha I see the first signs of a dictatorship..Thank God I left the country...Now only the foreign powers can save us from our own dictators...I wish SL to be a second Zimbabwe soon so the ppl can understand how stupid they are..Long live the King..Peasants starve and die..Haha..
:-D. Thanks for the compliment. Last week I went to help out the training programme of Training for Trusteeship (TFT) by the Weeramanthri center, participants were youth groups in universities and other youth organizations from all corners of the country. See, I BELIEVE IN CHANGE and WORKING FOR IT. Check that out, it is in FaceBook.
Malli, this is not the best place to talk on that, I guess, now we have to play the waiting game. If U like to talk send me a personal massage.
@Rajadahana Goood. Hmm not really...Hope ur work achieves something at the end. But I highly doubt that..I ALSO BELIEVE IN CHANGES BUT IT"S NOT JUST WORKING IN SL...The day u show me that we moved from a 3rd world country to a 2nd world country I'll accept ur words with honor. Till then keep up ur good work and never give up. At the same time, I help my educated friends to move out from SL so they can have a good life here in Aus, leaving the uneducated in SL..
@Rajadahana This might not be the best place to talk. I feel shame to call myself a Sinhalese after seeing the way SL is heading towards. I lost the faith in our ppl totally. What a nation of a weak men. What a nation full of idiots. So disappointed.
I have to say, private companies try to maximize their profit by giving better service, only if they are regulated by proper set of regulation. If not they depend on short cuts. Think about LANKA SUPER DS. Caltex was trying to compete with it. But they lost the battle. Now what they have done Now caltex have bought Super DS and comes with both caltex and petroleum logo in the same can. See how caltex are trying to maximise their profits through political deals. IS that right?
@Rajadahana Now we are going around the same point. You just don't give away Gov institutions to private companies like a family business. U have to set rules and regulations to avoid monopoly, protect consumer rights, employment rights etc..At the same time, Gov shd act like a watchdog. There shd be a governing body that stands above all. For an example I work in a path lab and there r 3 labs in the state. Gov won't allow any company to take over the other. There shd be 3 to compete against.
How do you think, is our political system is in a position to act as a watch dog? We need a gang of strong watch dogs, but we don't have a good one, what we have is only a starving, weak one. So, can you identify the origin of the problem. Is it government institutions or political system?
@Rajadahana Ofcourse it's the political system. Like I said we all know it's the political system. That's why I look at the policies of each political party. I fully supported the regaining SL economic policy of UNP back then. They did pretty good things to increase the economic growth. They didn't give Gov jobs coz the economy wasn't strong enough to accommodate more Gov servants. They privatised many institutions. But at the end, our ppl wanted the corrupted system. Now pay for the mistakes
If you say UNP is not a corrupted place, keep in mind a whole UNP bunch is with this government, including the past chief secretary SB. Government is a mix of all sorts of ideas, concepts, understandings, perceptions etc.
@Rajadahana I never said or never will say that UNP is a clean party. I said, I supported their regaining SL policy. It's a great party compared to SLFP. But RW is ruining it. RW is also responsible for being a weak opposition leader. Gov is not a mix of ideas. Ex-UNPers who accused MR openly as Tsunami Hora r now saying MR is a clean man. I'm over that man. Kill all the bastards. We need fresh blood. Ppl shd wake up and think wisely. Who voted Paba, Sanath, Geetha, Ranjan?? Our stupid ppl.
I do agree. But my idea is people can be changed. I took the word mix not in the sense of good. mmm.... I would say government is a FRUIT SALAD. That is what I wanted to convey. Didn't do my communication right.
@Rajadahana Yes but when will see that change. The rate we r going down as a nation shows that time is crucial to rectify things. We have gone beyond the limit where there's no come back. Even if we do, it will take 100 years to reach the level of a developed country. But again, I don't think it's possible in 100 years coz this system is like a cycle. Majority of our ppl love this system. All they want is, something for free from the Gov. They r like beggers. So wat can we do mate.
You are saying a very sensitive thing, brother. When you are getting matured, you will feel and understand the weight of what you are saying. loosing your job is not that simple when you have a family to take care of, a decision which will effect to all of your dependents. Naming and shaming is not the answer for the problem. I never point my finger and blame them. I think you should think of correcting your approach. I will tell you another thing.
@Rajadahana I didn't come to Aus with a job on my hand. I studies hard to get qualifications and I found the right job. Loosing a job is not easy and I know how it feels like coz I've been through that once. I didn't sit down and blame anybody but started looking for other jobs. I'm not the only person who lost a job in this world. Think maturely. u shd understand that life is not a bed full of roses. U have to expect the worst.
One can call you as a person who is less patriotic. Why? Because you are staying in AUS, where the country has an acute necessity of the involvement of youth for development of the country after WAR. But I don't say like that. Because I am not narrow minded. Except for that, what I do is appreciate your interest on SL from over there, and you love to the motherland. You may be doing very little, but that bit also important. I believe in totality, togetherness, collectivity
@Rajadahana Why staying overseas is considered as less patriotic? I owe my country. I studied for free for 13 years thanks to tax payers. I wud love to come down and serve my own ppl. But I'm not willingly to insult myself n my qualifications. Can I get the right job in SL? No u need a letter from a minister. Do u get the right place? No, u have to work under a boss who hasn't even passed year 12 but has the back up from the minister. Do I get paid for what I do? NO, u'll just depend on parents
@Rajadahana Dude, I've seen the world. I have visited 3rd world countries and developed countries. I've seen the difference. It's our ppl. The way our ppl think. They r not educated. They have been fooled for decades and it will be the same in the future. Look what's happening in SL. MR is taking down the country. He's not worried abt our problems but abt his presidency terms. I knew he's a not a man of word. Ppl laugh at Sri Lankans. They see things that our ppl don't see. It hurts but ?????
Fourthly, the people who are talking for privatization says new new technology comes in to the country, which we say as CAPITAL in economics, with privatization. It may be in the concept. But not happened in SL. HOLCIM, DCSL, CHICO all three run with the same machinery which we had while they were state owned. So what these companies are doing? Do the invest for new machinery? No they do few changes in the management and earn profits. it is like profits without INVESTING
@Rajadahana Not always. Part of the contract might include the line "acquisition of all the assets and equipments". Basically they take over the operations. They have a plan that earn profits without investing. That's what u need when running an organisation. Politicians act like Professors in management and screw everything. Since we can't change that system, it's better to give it to someone who can actually do it. Politicians can poke their finger into Gov assets but not when its privatised
U hit the BULLS-EYE, great. All your thinking is based on one assumption. That is "Since we can't change that system" (your own words) that is the simple difference in you and me. Both of us identify the core problem is within the political system, you assume, one can't change that & tries to find alternatives due to that. In my case I believe that can be changed, that should be changed and it is the only solution, no alternative can provide results it only worsen the situation
@Rajadahana U r right we both identify the core problem. But I don't really assume on the fact "Since we can't change the system". Our system is way too corrupted and the current politicians play the main role. When u say WE HAVE TO CHANGE, thousands will say NO WE DON'T HAVE TO COZ THIS IS THE BEST and WE ARE THE BEST. Another core problem that identified in our system is, LIN MADI ADAHAS. U believe that u can do it but remember SL is not democratic country. They will shut u off before u speak.
I will tell you another thing, this is on Railway. in railways maintaining track is the biggest cost. So the previous governments started discussions with companies to privatize the CGR. Where the discussion ended. The companies said they will take the Maradana and Fort railway stations. Why? because they are the major income generating points. What about the track? that has to be done by the government. Can U believe GOSL agreed on that also. But stopped by huge strikes.
@Rajadahana I dunno much abt privatising Railway department but i do know that its loosing money in millions. Either we shd privatise the operations (Partial ownership) or have a deal with them to share the income to maintain the track. It can be done on the negotiating table. Public can protest without even knowing the deal. It can be an advantageous one to both parties.
Appreciate that you accept that you don't now about Railway. No dear, when the privatization discussions are going on, the companies always have the motivator of maximizing PROFIT to turn the table to their side. So the politicians have to have the PATRIOTISM to turn the. So these two forces create a balance in the final agreement. But you know SL has ran out of patriotic politicians. So end result if basically one sided. So, nothing wrong with the privatization concept.
@Rajadahana Ok let's say that the end result is one sided. Is that a better result than letting the organisation to go bankrupt or unsuccessful in doing, what it is supposed to do to the public. For an example, If the railway department is not moving ahead to give a better service to the public, If the department is loosing money continuously, If the management can't handle it's operations efficiently, One more harm can it be done? Being patriotic is not a solution, be a smart negotiator
Respond to this video...RECTIFYING the Gov doesn't mean u go on a strike and stop what they are doing. I would interpret that as a way of getting the Gov on to the right track. For an example, if the transportation minister is over filling the department staff with his political henchmen, u have to protest against it and stop it. If u support his actions coz u get a job somehow and then shout against the privatisation of a tax money eater is not what I call "RECTIFYING".
Striking is a one tool that can be used to put the governments to the right track. Even though it is rarely used for that purpose in SL. I am in the process of providing you facts, why I am against privatization in the present or previous context. (Present or previous governments) But remember I will not be against privatization in the future, if the environment gets changed to a position where it favours privatization. I don't consider privatization itself as a SIN.
@Rajadahana Environment won't change under the current Gov coz they are against the privatisation like JVP. I think this is the best time for privatisation as we need to pay off all the debts we acquired during the war and there's no sign of any Gov organisation rising up with profits and also to end this corrupted system. If u go against the privatisation, leaving a treasure to corrupted politicians and a play ground for their henchmen, I don't think that environment is nowhere near.
@goodbyelonglive44 Normally ppl r not saints like u think. If they r so pure, this world is gonna be a better place. But u r in a fantasy world. Australians can think of the same way. Why Lankans come here n grab our kids jobs n be in our job market. But they r smart. They let only professionals to come in n work for their country. Take me for an example. I studied upto year 12 for free n now working for Aussies. SL Gov got nothing back from me for what they spent on me. And there r heaps.
@goodbyelonglive44 So don't blame capitalism or muslim businessmen. If u can't live upto that u'll fail. It's called "Survival of the fittest". That's the problem in SL. Everyone goes by the books without understanding the system. Lee quan Yew developed S'gapore without economic books. He thought abt the location of S'gapore. He had a vision. He was honest. He loved the country. He didn't think abt his family to be in power like MR. He did what's best for the country. Noone in SL is doing that.
@goodbyelonglive44 No humanity or cultural value will prevail when ppl starve to death. When its extremely difficult to live. Ppl will start doing crimes to become rich. What wud u do if u see ur kids starving to death. R u gonna feed cultural values n humanity or do whatever u can to get some food ? I told u earlier that our ppl r weak and fooled by the cunning politicians. Since u can't change that fact, face the reality. SL is going down. UNP policies did work for SL
@goodbyelonglive44 Mate look at the stats and then talk. Wat u believe is crap. My father thinks the same. Do u know how many Sri Lankan professionals apply for residency over here? Do u know how many Chinese students apply for residency here? Why ppl leave SL in boats to come to Aus. Mate ppl r not dumb to leave the country that they were born if they can have a good life and a future for their kids. They know that SL is no where near Aussie in many things. Don't speak if u r not sure
@goodbyelonglive44 According to u, we shd shut the gates for Western countries. Then u have to shut the gates in SL and avoid ppl migrating to western countries. They migrate to Western countries bcoz there's no hope in SL and country is going down every day. First understand the word "Privatising". It doesn't mean u r selling the country but an organisation that belonged to the gov which is under performing. I don't care whether u like Germany or not coz it's irrelevant to wat we talk.
I didn't read all the heap of comments posted here. I am talking just about this particular comment on privatizing. Privatizing might be a good concept, but it is not due to what you mentioned. What you are saying is if the owners of the government institutions, which is the government is under performing, it is good to change the ownership for the betterment of that institute. That is not how we do things in life and it is also not the solution. I will give you an example.
@Rajadahana Well one simple tip to ya dude..U can do whatever u want in your OWN life using ur OWN money. U can choose to loose money n continue investing money on something. This is a Gov and it belongs to the public. Don't take personal examples in your life to explain something that belongs to 2 Million people. I may chose to open up a business and If I don't do well I might sell it or try my best to succeed. I take the risk with my own money. So it's different.
Think your child is under performing in school exams, wold you change the ownership? That means do you give your child to a better or efficient father than yourself? Simply it is not the solution, because it is not the problem. If it is really a problem of yourself you try to change your behaviors. Then try to motivate the child. Simply apply that to privatizing. I hope you are not a father or mother who gives your child for someone, because your child is under performing.
@Rajadahana Ur example is so irrelevant to this topic. But I'll take some part of it. If ur kid is under performing, u need to find out why? Where's the mistake? How to find a solution and stuff. If it's the father who's not being supportive to the kid, yes u have to change urself. I hope u don't choose to be the same father n let ur kid under perform for the rest of his life bcoz of ur mistake. Apply that to privatising now.
You are supporting me, not talking against me. Think twice on what you mentioned. You didn't change the father(OWNERSHIP) of the child, but you changed the behavior of the father, or correct the father. So apply that to privatization. What you have to do is rectify the government but not the ownership of the institute.
But add something to that. If you are a person who sees that government cannot be rectified and we also can't do anything. Then you will see this as impractical.
@Rajadahana I said ur example is not valid to begin with. So how wud I be able to support u? Rectify the Gov ?? Good luck with that mate...Most impractical line I've ever seen. I would love to see how u planning on that..
There is a famous saying "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." If you are in the side of GOOD, (I think that is so, according to what you are saying) Are you still thinking on maintaining silence. One more thing could you please name the country you are living in. Then i can directly answer you.
@Rajadahana I'm living in Australia. Like I said, most of the Gov workers like this system coz they get paid for coming to work even though they do nothing. So they will support this system. Ppl who work for private companies work hard and get paid. At the end of the day ppl get paid but country is loosing money everyday. One happy country....
I need nether your support nor your approval (Sorry about being blunt) to continue what I am doing. All what matters is whether you act for a cause or not. Until and unless you act, your words (only words) are useless. If you are up to a true cause, let me know, I will be by the side of you. Your radical words or ideas (if I think so) are contradicts with your sluggishness to acute yourself. That is a common disease in SL.
@Rajadahana Have u ever seen what ppl do in SL to change this system. They protest, They shout, they will get attacked by the cops. At the end u get nothing. Ppl r so dumb in SL. They can be fooled very easily. They don't think long term opportunities. They just think what they got from this Gov. If u look at the Australian election. It was a hung parliament this time and ppl love it. Balance of power. In SL ?? Unofficial Dictatorship
We'll just think that all what you said is true. With all that, you can't say it is impossible to do some change. Simply ACT AND SEE. You will see the change. The main problem what I see in you (which has in many Sri lankans) you try to swim while staying on land. I will guarantee you that the change can occur even with all those circumstances. Because I am a person who is working in the ground level in villages. So I know this is your IGNORANCE. Ask me more, I will clarify.
YOU, may be thinking we have nothing to do to rectify the government, so you see what I am saying as impractical. But that doesn't mean it is not a solution. Also remember it is your opinion and only yours.
@Rajadahana I see the practical side of the privatisation. I live in a country where almost everything's privatised (Ofcourse the Gov has the control to avoid monopoly). Perfectly runs the country. No strikes, No lazy workers, No losses, Perfect service..Our uneducated ppl consider it as Selling public properties to private companies but not as a big change in order to reverse the whole process which makes it lot efficient and productive to the country. So u pick..
@Rajadahana BTW, in ur example, Kid resembles the public, Father resembles the Gov I hope. In that scenario, kids have chosen many fathers and they have changed their fathers through out the history. Also the kid decides who's gonna be his father. So let's see an example which is relevant to this like LECO and electricity board. Why private company is profitable when the Elec board is loosing millions every year? R u telling me that it's ok to loose our tax money n let it be like that?
I have to go to the rectify the mistakes we do in speaking. Because, this particular comment stuck go going around a misuse of words. There are two concepts as STATE and GOVERNMENT, remember there is a HUGE gap bet ween them. But in SL we use government for both. So actually, even though we say government owned institutions, actually it is STATE owned institutions. So there is still one farther, my example still stands. I would like to mention something on the mistake you did.
@Rajadahana Well the state is governed by the Government. Government release funds to state. Gov has the control over state. It's the same thing even though it's two different words and Sri Lanka has only one state. We don't have many states like Aus, US or India..There's are no state Governments. So I dunno what u talking abt ? Maybe provincials ?? Districts ???
I feel really sorry about doing this. I know this is not an English lesson. I don't want to insult your fluency in English. But these are the 2 definitions given by the Merry Webster dictionary, which is used by many.
GOVERNMENT - the act or process of governing; specifically : authoritative direction or control
STATE - a politically organized body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially : one that is sovereign
@Rajadahana U r insulting urself. Read my comment again n again until u understand what i mentioned. Two different words and there's no question abt that. Let's see according to ur dictionary. state is defined as a " occupying territory". So how many states do we have in Sri Lanka and which body govern them? U might be able to see the link between the state n Gov and also that it's the same in SL coz we have only ONE state government or territory.
I can't understand why you are defining territory as a part of a country (district, province or county). Country it self is a territory. It should be government controls or rules the state, not state government, because we are referring this to the country. Sorry, I don't want to explain the theories of political science in here. To end the conversation (because you are not familiar with the theoretical aspect of it) are two different concepts, according to Political Science.
@Rajadahana Ur political concepts maybe right theoretically but not practically in SL. Not just that, there are many things that r not valid in SL politics. Who's the head of state? Who's the head of Gov? 2 different positions but same person bcoz Sri Lanka has no too many states. just one. If things go wrong within the state who's responsible?? Head of Government or head of state coz according to ur theory it's not the same.
I said from the very beginning it is it is two concepts in POLITICAL SCIENCE. So don't call it YOUR theory, what you are doing here is challenging theories in Political Science, I would like to stress the word science. So I wish you all the best on that and hope you will come up with a thesis or a book which explains your new theory. You may be awarded a Doctorate for that, but my advice is to study and understand the prevailing theory before doing that.
@Rajadahana I have no interest in political science so i don't think I need ur advices or concepts in political science. Use ur big knowledge to do something worth for SL. U know ur knowledge and big theories have no values when it comes to SL politics. So far u cudn't even explain me why Elec board is loosing when LECO is earning. Apply those political science theories and explain how smart u r..I'm sure u'll end up with an answer of a 5th grader.
Unless you really want to continue your arguments or concepts on STATE and GOVERNMENT, I don't want to continue that, further we go, it will further elaborate on your ignorance in political science. If I try to answer your question in here, it would be a start of a long lesson on political science. I don't want to do that, because it is not the place. So do your homework in political science before commenting. Also, all what you see, feel, think, believe, talk are not THEORIES
@Rajadahana No need to argue mate..U r one of those guys who read books and books and books until u die. But no common sense at all..I've seen ppl like u who talk theories and concepts which are pretty useless when it comes down to action. u guys r the dumbest coz everything is not on the book. Be real..
1. What should I say, when you misunderstand. When I say I don't want to give lectures, You say I don't want your lectures. So we are saying the same thing
2. When I say these theories are not mine, you continue using the word "YOUR THEORY"
3. This is the first time i hear an idea which sounds like, privitising has nothing to do with politics
4. i can't imagine how a person in AUS can be realistic on SL than a person who is working in the ground level
1.First u shd understand that I'm not here to hear ur lectures, So no point in saying I don't want to give u lectures.
2. Theory might not be urs but when u quote it, it comes as ur theory coz u brought it up to discussion. Doesn't necessarily mean u created it. But u r using it.
3. Privatising has something to do with economic strategic plans. But ur concepts n definitions in political science such as wat's STATE n GOV has nothing to do with Privatising.
You are making a fundamental, simple and crude error of the USER automatically becomes the OWNER. It happened in to two occasions, one regarding the head of state and the head of the government, two regarding the phrase YOUR THEORIES. Privatizing is concept which always involves government and state. Giving the ownership of your business to someone (may be to your brother) is not privatizing.
I will do something which you don't like. I will give the definition of privatization - endorsing / assigning the ownership of a public property/business to a private party. So the involvement of the state/government cannot be eliminated when we talk about privatizing. As humans we make our little worlds in our minds. That doesn't need to match with what is outside. What you have understood is not what really is PRIVATIZATION. Don't worry, those things happens to all of us.
one more thing, I will assure U that U can't see the holistic picture of SL while staying in AUS. Simply because U have to depend on news, views and information which are definitely polluted according to the individual who is providing them. I have first hand experiences on people, their problems and the current situation; because analyzing them is included to my job. So again I say it shows your IGNORANCE on the ground situation in SL, but I am sure U R not LINDE INNA GEMBEK
@Rajadahana I do have first hand experience too. My parents still live in SL. I can depend on the info they passed on to me. All I'm asking u is, what reason u got to say that "privatisation" is not a good economic plan for SL if that particular institution continuously under performs due to management efficiency which is driven by corrupted Gov politicians. Since u can't change it and majority likes it, sit down n talk abt theories until a God comes down n develop SL over night.
@Rajadahana I was born in SL and brought up in SL for 21 years. That's why I said I've first hand experience in SL. When I moved to AUS, I got first hand experience in AUS and I can compare the systems that I have experienced in both countries. I can sort of see the problems that causes inefficiency in SL and productivity in AUS which is currently ranked 2nd in world for Human Development Index. Man U r a walking dictionary haha. No wonder u r a POTH GULLEK..
@Rajadahana MAMA LANKAWE 21 YEARS INNA KOTA FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE GATHTHA KIYANA EKAI LANKA WE NATHI KAALE PARENTS LAGEN WISTHARA DANA GATHTHA KIYANA EKAI THERUM GANNA BARI HINDA THAMAI OYAGE BRAIN DAMAGE KIWWE. OYATA MONA PART EKA DA THERENNE NATHTHE EKE?? OYA MULU RATEMA WISTHARA DANA GANNE RATA WATE GIHIN DA? NATHTHAM MEDIA EKEN DA??
OYAA WEDAKARANNE AUSSI WALA GAL KORIYAKA NEME NEEDA? OYAA GE OYA BORU TIKA GALAK ISSARAHATA GIHIN KIWWOTH GAL TIKA KADAGATTHAHAKI. Do I need to write what actually happend,
STEP 1 : I said first hand then you said you get information from your parents
STEP 2 : I said what is the meaning of first hand then you said you were in Sri Lanka for 21 years.
MONAWADA MACHANG PODI LAMAI WAGEENE. OYA AWURUDU 21 KATHAWAK KIWWE, MAMA first hand KIYANNE MENNA MEEKAI KIWWATA PASSENE.
@Rajadahana MAMA KIWWA MATATH FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE THIYENAWA. MATA MAGE PARENTS LAGEN NEWS LABENEWA KIYALATH KIWWA. LANKA WE FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE GANNA LANKA WE INNA KOTAI AUS EXPERIENCE GANNE MEHE INNA KOTAI KIYALA OYATA THERENNE NATHTHAM OYAGE METER EKE UPSET EKAK. EKAI MAMA SUDDA SINHALEN KIWWE MAMA 21 YEARS HITIYE LANKA WE KIYALA. ANEH MANDA THAAMA THERUNADA KIYALA. MAMA DAAPU COMMENT EKE FIRST LINE EKA AYE KIYAWANNA. NATHTHAM MAMA COPY PASTE KARANNA DA? OYA MENTAL CASE EKAK NEH
I do have first hand experience too. My parents still live in SL. I can depend on the info they passed on to me.
Alright, sorry for understanding according to English. Next time, put a word like ALSO, before the second sentence.,that is better English. Then the receiver knows you are talking about two points. If not it sounds like you are talking about the same thing. I said even earlier that, the little world having inside your mind doesn't always match with the outside world.
@Rajadahana Well I didn't use the word BCOZ in between. Two different sentences. I didn't know that u use formal English in youtube. Read ur definition again. U can't get first hand experience from ur parents dumbo. I can't help it if u think like a dumb person and assume everyone's dumb like u. I don't use formal Eng in youtube. U might have realised that I use just "u" instead of using "you". Do u know why? Bcoz there's a word limitation in youtube. I live in Aus and have no prob with my Eng.
When I talk about without and less, it is "professor talk" for you. When I talk about "also" it is formal English for you. And just read my comment few minutes back, did I say you are "wrong" no, I used the word "better" so there is no need to jump up furiously.
@Rajadahana I said I don't use formal English here to limit the number of characters which means I accepted that I didn't use ALSO and pu a full stop. At the same time I didn't use the word BCOZ so u don't get the wrong message. But somehow u got it wrong. Anyway back to Privatisation mate..Which party is involved in privatising Gov assets?
Is that all you have to say on n.privatization? Actually the purpose of that question is not clear, but privatization was done by both SLFP and UNP, they are the only parties who had govern this county up to now, aren't they?
@Rajadahana "n. privatization is different from what is prevailing in the world which we living in. It need not to have the involvement of the government or state" Why did u say it need NOT to have the involvement of the GOV/STATE?? Now u r saying it's done by the parties who had govern this country? Basically it's the GOV/STATE. It could be a SLFP or UNP Gov which is not the question. First u said GOV need NOT to have involvement n now u r saying it's the GOV who's done it. WTF ???
why did you make this a spam, you can use the remove button, if you want to remove your comment.
Forntunately, Youtube doesn't delete previous comments, if not I couldn't have done this. These are your own words.
"if u start loosing money from ur business and dunno how to get it back on to the track or have no funds to get it back on to the track u might sell it to a person who can do that".
Did I the person who say Government or state is not involved in PRIVITISING???? You even use the word "WTF" to express yourself. What an utter misunderstanding. You are asking me the questions which I asked from you earlier, why is that???
Read and understand my statement, if I am a baby you are still not born.
"n. privatization is different from what is prevailing in the world which we living in. It need not to have the involvement of the government or state"
What refers to "it" in here - n.privatization
What is n.privatization? naughtyboyya's privatization
What is naughtyboyya's privetization? It is a concept in the mind of naughtyboyya about a process which is different from the privatization which we know.
@Rajadahana Just to show u how much of an idiot u r. n.privatisation always stated that the involvement of the GOV or the STATE. So how did u come up with the concept that n.privatisation need NOT to have involvement of GOV/STATE ???
Alright sir, tell me according to the little world inside your head, what do you understand as "privatization" I would like to name it as n. privatization with your consent (naughtyboyya's privatization). because n. privatization is different from what is prevailing in the world which we living in. It need not to have the involvement of the government or state. So first describe what YOU imagine, feel, hallucinate or understand as n. privatization. (naughtyboyya in wonderland)
@Rajadahana This is interesting. Ok let's say for an example, privatisation of railway department due to its poor management system. Who's getting involved in that process? ur family?or the Gov of Sri Lanka as it is a key department under the ministry of transport? From what I understand n.Privatisation refers to transfer of any government function to the private sector. There are many ways of privatising. I personally think "Partial ownership" is the best for SL like Emirates.
@Rajadahana U r such a baby...I simply mentioned that the GOV must involve in the process of privatisation. I expect u to come up with an answer to show me that it's NOT. U believe that privatisation can be done without the involvement of the GOV/STATE..Too bad u cudn't understand the sarcasm when I dropped the line which means 'If it's not Gov is it ur family that involves". Did u get it baby?
Ok I got it, sorry, My family is not featuring in "naughtyboyya in wonderland", I feel you are very serious about your little world. I got it UNCLE, go ahead tell me more on n.privatization.
@Rajadahana There's nothing more to tell as long as u agreed to my point. Since u agreed that STATE/ GOV shd involve in privatising but not ur family, wat else u want me to say. Oh maybe something like "WHY THE HELL DID I WASTE MY TIME WITH THIS DUMBO"...Well that's something I wud actually say now n leave. Thanks for wasting my time..Hav fun..
Thanks mate for sharing your thoughts, but I have to say that this is the first time I have come across a person with many misunderstandings and misconceptions, who cannot and don't have the willingness to understand them. Never met this kind among SL community. If it is your will to do so, we'll conclude this, have a nice day, wishing you to enjoy the day to its maximum.
@Rajadahana Thanks dude. I have to say the same. Good luck with ur researching stuff. Hope u'll become the President of Sri Lanka one day (I'M HALLUCINATING NOW) and develop SL with ur knowledge in economic theories. Oh before that try ur best on rectifying the Gov. On the day u become successful, simply drop a msg to me. Sri Lanka needs ppl like u. Better stay in SL. Never ever think of moving to Aus not even in a boat. I don't wanna see a SL in Aus. Good luck again.
Up to now I tied to continue this discussion with respect, because you are elder than me. But see what you are doing, BAALANSA PANTHIYE PODIEKEK WAGENE NODANNA DEWAL GENA BORU PANDITHAKAM KIYAWANAWANNE.
@Rajadahana OYA DANNA BAWA PENNANNA GIHIN NONDI WENEWA NEH. I can't help it if u keep typing definitions like a University Prof for every word I say. OYAGE PANDITHA TALKS HODAI UNION WALATA.
NARIYA MIDI THITTHAI KIWWA WAGE 2.50 WEDANE OYAATE THIYENNE. You started the talk like an INTELLECTUAL. You tried to say some of the things which you don't know to show that you are a briny person. So answered you accordingly.
@Rajadahana MAMA DANNE NATHI EWA PENNANNE NAH. MAMA OKKOMA DANNETH NAHA. OYA WAGE ECONOMIC EXPERT KENEKUTH NEWEI. HABAI LANKAWE INNA PANDITHAYO SET EKA WADA KARANA THEORY EKATA PIN SIDDA WENNA API THAWA AWURUDU 50 KATAWATH DEVELOPED COUNTRY KIYANA NAMA GANNA EKA DREAM EKAK.OYA OLUWEN HITA GATHTHATH EKA MEH KAPEDI WENNE NAH. MOKO APE EWUN ECONOMIC THEORIES DANNAWA WADI. UN HITHANNE API THAMAI PORAWAL KIYALA. HABAI RATA RUN KARANNE WESTERN RATAWAL DENA LOANS WALIN. MARU SHOK
OYA MEEWAGE KATHA KARANNA AKAMETHI KIYALA KIWWANANG APITH MULA INDALAMA SINHALEN TALK EKA DENAWANE. Without going for these discussions in a scientific manner.
@Rajadahana I didn't really see any scientific notations from u at all. From the beginning u were giving me some whole bunch of definitions using a dictionary. RATAKATA ONE WADA KARANNA PULUWAN MINISSU MISAK THEORY WALIN RATA RUN KARANA MINISSU NEWEI. EKA APE EDUCATION SYSTEM EKE WARADDA. GODA IDAN PEENANNA IGENA GANNAWA WAGE WADAK. OYA DANNA THEORIES DAALA LANKA WA GODA GATHTHA DAATA MAMA FULL RESPECT EKA DENEWA. OYA IGENA GATHTHA THEORY LANKA WATA VALID NAH.
@Rajadahana MAMA DANNAWA OYATA SCIENCE BARI BAWA EKANE ARA NUCLEAR STRUCTURE EKAK GANA KIYANNA GIHIN MAGEN AHAGATHTHE. SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION EKAK KARADDI ONE MONADA KIYALA DANNE NATHIWA WORDS WALA DEFINITIONS DICTIONARY EKAK BALA BALA DENA OYA EKKA MONA SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS DA. KARANNA PULUWAN DEYAK NAM APITH SUPPORT. EKA THAMAI MAMA KIYANNE PRIVATISE KARAPAN KIYALA. OYA KIYANNE GOV EKA RECTIFY KARANNA KIYALA. MAHINDA GE PUTHA OYA NAM MATA PODDAK HITHALA BALANNA PULUWAN SUPPORT EKAK DENNA
Sorry boss, that is pure misunderstanding, regarding seeing the atomic structure. Anyway I may be wrong, just send me the source that you got to know on the microscope which shows the atomic structure. I will rectify my self, not like you. Is it in Australia? :-DDD
@Rajadahana "This is 21st century mate. U can talk abt atomic structure using NMR spectra. U can't see nuclear particles but we know how to determine atomic structure of molecules". This is exactly wat said. u can't see them but they exist and can be determine using a NMR spectra. Not just in Aus even in SL if u have some tertiary education in Chemistry. I didn't even use the word Microscope u dumbo. Pls don't try to show ur stupidity here with things that I didn't even say.
REALL HERO
gayan851 5 months ago
sf pawaladeepu ponnaya
udaradesilva 6 months ago
Comment removed
udaradesilva 6 months ago
As a Sri Lankan and also as a Thomian I'm really proud of you sir...!!!
gihanep 8 months ago
What'r man. Real Hero
nirudha1 1 year ago
I am sorry naughty boyya,
I went to your profile and got to know that you are 23. Sorry, I shouldn't have done that I thought you must be in your 40s, according to the way you comment. Ape rate podi malliyekne. Sorry malla, hope you are doing your studies in Aussie. Good luck. I would have never comment like that if I knew your age. GOOD LUCK again. So happy to see your interest on Sri Lanka.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
I am apologizing from you, because as I mentioned earlier even before,
not accepting mistakes, talking about what you don't know, make judgments hurriedly, making assumption on things with less knowledge (I used the word less not without), aggression.
All are characteristics of YOUTH. You have shown what you are. I wouldn't have give much of an attention for them, if I knew your age. Remember I am a person who works with Adolescence and Youth. All the very best in your future endeavors.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana No need to apologize or feel bad. BTW I still think the Gov shd privatise (Partial ownership) many institutions like Sri Lankan airlines, Elec board, Railway etc..I don't consider it as selling public assets. It's a long term investment. Ease the pressure on the Gov if they do the right thing. Avoid monopoly and set rules n regulations. That's all I have to say. BYE>>>>
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I still can remember how I saw the world or interpret the world when I was 23. Yes I agree with you. you are a genius and I am an idiot. Totally agree with you due to the reasons I mentioned earlier. If you say privatization is good, yes, then it is good. No body can challenge that, specially through a very poor communication media such as youtube comments.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana
Privatization itself cannot harm any one. It is just another concept. It is the implementation what matters.
It is like a knife. Knife has nothing wrong itself. But it can be used either to cut beans or a neck as well. Sri Lanka is not the best conducive environment when it comes for implementing privatization..
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana My point was, privatisation is another concept and needs to be done better and needs to be transparent so the public can be assured that they will receive something better for what is being sold. Higher productivity and efficiency. DCSL, Sri Lankan, SLT, LECO, CHICO are landmark successes in privatisation. It's abt the way we look at it and use it. Like ur example, use the knife for beans not for necks wisely. It's abt the person who handles it.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I will tell you a story. My mothers sister worked in ORUWALA WANE, when it was privatized. When the discussion went on with the government a huge strike came up. Any how the privatization was done. What was the new company did. They sacked all the stickers. Then they didn't recruit people for them. They could start the operations because it was over staffed before. was the recruiting of excessive staff to WANE SANSTAWA a management decision? No, it was a political decision.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Privatising ORUWALA WANE to CHICO was a good decision to me bcoz of the reason you pointed out. There's a limit of staff that a company can handle in order to operate efficiently. If the balance is lost due to any reason (Could be a political decision to over staff), that organisation won't last. Man power was equalised by sacking extra staff by the company which is fair enough (Not unfair dismissal). I hope they got some compensation or ETF after all.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I will ask you a question, what do you think, or what is your opinion about the board of directors or the management, when WANE SANSTAWA is under the state? Were those top people in the WANE SANSTHAWA efficient or inefficient?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
That is one. Secondly the privatizing process was not a 100% decision of the government. What happened was, the company representatives came to SL, accessed the potential of WANEE SANSTAWA, and they got to know that it is huge, then they influence the government to do that. Government people are also sell themselves to anything if the benefits are up to their limit. So deal got approved easily.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana That's how the private equity consortium works. They target and influence the deal...
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Thirdly, then the new management said to the staff who left that they will provide all the necessary iron, if they want to do any construction in their houses. I think the management did that for one year. What did that means, even at that time without any renovations WANE SANSTHAWA had the capacity to do something like that.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana That was like a compensation act to me. If they terminated the employment and if it's not done due to a serious offence, the organisation shd pay compensation. We call it redundancy here. Ofcourse they have the capacity for that and they get ready for that part and I'm sure it's included in the deal.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Could you please answer my question on the efficiency of the management, which was there when WANE SANSTAWA was owned by the state?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana If the efficiency was there, they wouldn't have hired more staff members just bcoz the minister said to do so. They shd have used ur thinking of 'We have to stand up against this politicians to stop over filling the organisation". Nobody did that. I'm sure the management itself playing as political henchmen. They can't go against it but to support it and they will do anything to keep their jobs. Who's the chairman back then? Must be a political henchmen. I call that poor managment
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Hey Malli, After some time. I will give you a broader angle of the difference of the state owned enterprises and a private ownership. That is state owned are supposed to take decision for the benefits of the community, private ownership is trying only to maximize profits. Their CSR programmes are also used to image building which helps them to achieve more profits in the long run.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana This is how I feel the situation in Sri Lanka..State owned are supposed to take decisions for the community but they only take decisions to support the minister wasting billions of our tax money. Only they benefit. Private companies maximize their profit by having a good management system which serves the community indirectly. State organisations are supposed to serve the community but it doesn't mean we have to loose billions at the end. That's a non-profitable charity programme
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Exactly my point. Again and Again I have to say is, it is the problem with the minister (Politician, or the politicization), not with the organization or of the management. Private companies act like mad dogs in countries like ours which doesn't have proper rules and regulation. So what to do to regulate them? Who is having the power of making decisions. Once again it comes back to the same place like a boomerang (you must be knowing on that than me).
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I don't get ur point. If the management is controlled by a corrupted minister why do u say it's not the problem of the management? Management takes decisions to satisfy the ministers needs. They r willing to waste billions of our tax money to do that coz it's OUR money. But private companies take decisions to save THEIR money n maximize the profits. To maximise profits u have to give a better service. So they end up giving a good service to the community. It's abt OUR and THEIR money
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Sorry I didn't clarify that. I referred management as the people who are below the politicians level. Please correct your assumption that government servants are trying to take decisions to satisfy ministers. There are only very few like that and those are the few people who get benefited by those decisions. Most of others do these against their conscious. If they talk or act according to their conscious, they will loose their job in the very next day.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Haha u reached the point where I wanted to u to reach. Only few genuine hard working Gov servants r there and they will never stand against these corrupted officials in order to protect their jobs. They can work hard but at the end everything goes down the drain. That's why these institutions loose billions. It's not an assumption. It's the fact. I don't think a few corrupted workers can over run too many efficient hard working workers. So I would say, it's the other way around. .
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
The helicopters (the pilots in this case) were used to transport thamil selvam at the ceasefire time, were used also to crush LTTE, last year. Air force is one state owned institution. Is the commander of the Air force responsible for those two scenarios? It was political decisions. What matters most is not the efficiency of the government servant, it is the decisions of the politician. Who should be changed, Air force commander or defense minister?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Again, majority of the ppl want to keep the defence minister not the air force commander. Ppl love this corrupted system. They just simply look at what they got and what will they get from the Gov. They don't think abt the future of this country. They can be bought for a packet of rice or with impressive promises. Since u and myself can't change the system, we'll see a corrupted country forever. Poor country with a powerful president.. Sounds bit like Zimbabwe
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
"Since u and myself can't change the system" my idea is different, I think we can. I am thinking positively about that.
"You may say that I'm a dreamer, But I'm not the only one" - JOHN LENNON
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Identifying what is to be corrected here is very crucial. Is it the management of the organization or this bad system? Malli, I will give you a classic example.
Nigeria has oil. But more than 95% of them are exported by private companies. So what is the end result? Local oil price in Nigeria is one of the highest in the continent. If you can find the book "confession of an economic hit man", read it, you'll be informed more on what really is happening around the globe.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana To be honest I dunno the problems in Nigeria. I can give u whole bunch of examples in Aus how private companies run the country providing the best service to the public. 90% of the organisations r privatised here including transport, postal, banks, car manufacturers, telecommunication, utilities etc.Also less politicians to handle issues coz they have less departments to deal with. Politicians fool ppl using the line "We have to protect our national assets". Assets to them actually
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Why do you think the same privatization concept has failed in Nigeria, while it is successful in AUS from the people's perspective. The companies are regulated by a consistent set of rules. So how do you think about Sri Lanka is it more inclined towards Nigeria or AUS when it comes to set of consistent rules?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Onetime I was thrilled to hear about MIT, a world class company owned by a Sri lankan. What happened to it? It was bought over by british stock exchange. Have these external forces allowed us to develop a private sector in SL. No. I don't favour state owned institutions without reasons and facts, there are very many. If you send your email, I will be able to explain it properly. But I assure you, it would be a long email.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I don't like state owned institutions coz they chew up our tax money to satisfy a politician without serving the community. Everyone knows how we get served if u go to a Gov institution coz they simply don't care. Private companies do NOT chew our tax money and politicians can't poke their fingers in. They will provide a good service to the community in order to maximize their profit. Above all, it's the Gov that shd be controlling these companies with rules and regulations. Period
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
i totally agree with you on the inefficiency of the state owned institutions. No argument at all, on that. What you are saying is right, the eating of tax money is clearly visible when it comes to state owned institutions, but one has to be more alert to identify the invisible enemy.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana The real enemy is the attitude and the uneducated level of our ppl. NODANNA YAKATA WADA DANNA YAKA HODAI kiyana logic ekata MR ta chande dunnu un dan hithanawa athi nodanna yaka hodai kiyala. So the invisible enemy can be turned into a visible friend if we do the job wisely. The question is, is there anyone who can come forward to do that ? No coz they wanna see a tmr. That's how the system works. I challenged u to change that coz majority of our ppl want that system.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
The way the privatization was done in SL by both SLFP and UNP are wrong. It is useless to privatize our state owned institutions without making the necessary set of rules and regulations. In the UNP 2 years era, they didn't show any interest to strengthen the regulations. If they did so, I would have totallyGREEN by now. They didn't show any intent of doing so. Do you know UNP reduced the tax of a betting center per month from Rs. 30,000/- to Rs 3,000/-. I don't get it???
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Some of them were done wrongly and some of them were done correctly like Sri Lankan, LECO, SLT..Current Gov has no interest in privatising any institute or strengthening regulations. They just let it chew money which is even worst. What's the big deal in reducing tax in betting centres?? It's a business. It's the same as reducing the luxury vehicle tax by 50% now. What do u think abt giving more liquor licenses?? Importing more liquor??Increased tax on essential consumer products??
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I have to say some thing on Sri lankan. The minister of civil aviation, when air lanka was privatized was late, Mr. Dharmasiri Senanayake. But he didn't know that the agreement was signed. The funny thing was his signature was in the agreement, even though he got to know after that. So the deal was not transparent. Do you know Air Lanka had routes which emirates couldn't acquire. So Emirates used Air lanka routes to send emirates flights after privatization.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Who cares abt routes or ministers signature as long as it provides a good service to our ppl. Don't forget the fact they have also made Sri Lankan the best airline in Asia twice. Like I said, don't look for small things like routes and signatures. look at what's beneficial to us in long term. I guess u know the reason why emirates didn't extend their contract and left the country thanks to MR. Do u know that ground staff had to pull flights for taxing after they left?
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Economically, privatizing state monopolies is a malpractice. Sri Lankan is one good example. Sri Lankan increased the service levels, I do agree. But Air Lanka had more prestige in the international aviation arena than Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan couldn't achieve that even in the last year. Simply because one cannot make a prestigious image in the level of Air Lanka within a decade. (the root goes till AIR CEYLON)
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I don't agree that Sri Lankan airlines didn't make a prestigious image. Prestigious image can't be bought overnight. It takes years. I've travelled on Sri Lankan when it was under the emirates management and when it's under the current Gov management. I see a huge difference in service. Emirates invested money and I'm sure they don't wanna loose their image as a code share partner and as an airline alliance. Sri Lankan couldn't achieve anything after Emirates left. Yes I agree
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Malli I am emphasizing this for the second time. I am using the word politicians or politicizing, for all the politicians. not SLFP or UNP alone. So it is no use of talking on MR or any other particular politician with me in here. I was referring the forces around our country as unseen enemy, neither MR nor RW. Again I am not bias on MR or RW. Remember, through out the history, societies were changed by few who lead and rest following. It may be difficult but not IMPOSSIBLE.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana We r talking abt the current situation in SL. That's why the current politicians come to the play. I suppose we have to correct the mistakes we've done in the past to make it better for the future. But now it's going backwards. Yeah it's not impossible..I'm just thinking when it's gonna be possible??? In 100 years??? When we reach the stage of Zimbabwe???U r just believing the Gov propaganda on International forces. It's just a reason they made up to fool ppl. Don't be fooled mate
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Don't try to judge me. You made several mistakes when trying to do so. Sales rep, union leader etc. Again you made such a mistake. I very rarely watch ITN news. What government propaganda says is all the western world is trying to massacre us. But GOSL stands in between as a shield and protects all Sri lankans. (laugh)
But what I am saying is those international forces are there against all the countries like us. That is totally different. So don't quickly make a decision on me.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Haha I was joking abt sales rep n union leader thingy. I also said u r a political henchmen coz u were acting like one. I never said u watch ITN news. R u telling me that ITN news spread Gov propaganda around the country?? Well u picked it right. Our own politicians are against us and our future. So don't worry abt this hypothetical International forces when u can see the real local phantom in action right before ur eyes.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@Rajadahana What happened to u??? Were u arrested like SF when trying to rectify the Gov ??? Haha I see the first signs of a dictatorship..Thank God I left the country...Now only the foreign powers can save us from our own dictators...I wish SL to be a second Zimbabwe soon so the ppl can understand how stupid they are..Long live the King..Peasants starve and die..Haha..
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
:-D. Thanks for the compliment. Last week I went to help out the training programme of Training for Trusteeship (TFT) by the Weeramanthri center, participants were youth groups in universities and other youth organizations from all corners of the country. See, I BELIEVE IN CHANGE and WORKING FOR IT. Check that out, it is in FaceBook.
Malli, this is not the best place to talk on that, I guess, now we have to play the waiting game. If U like to talk send me a personal massage.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Goood. Hmm not really...Hope ur work achieves something at the end. But I highly doubt that..I ALSO BELIEVE IN CHANGES BUT IT"S NOT JUST WORKING IN SL...The day u show me that we moved from a 3rd world country to a 2nd world country I'll accept ur words with honor. Till then keep up ur good work and never give up. At the same time, I help my educated friends to move out from SL so they can have a good life here in Aus, leaving the uneducated in SL..
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
Comment removed
babakalabash 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@naughtyboyya අන්තර්ජාලයෙ මේ වගේ පොරවල්ලට (naughtyboyya) තමයි ට්රෝල් කියල කියන්නෙ. ට්රෝල්ලව ගනන් ගන්න හෙදනැහැ.
babakalabash 8 months ago
@Rajadahana This might not be the best place to talk. I feel shame to call myself a Sinhalese after seeing the way SL is heading towards. I lost the faith in our ppl totally. What a nation of a weak men. What a nation full of idiots. So disappointed.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I have to say, private companies try to maximize their profit by giving better service, only if they are regulated by proper set of regulation. If not they depend on short cuts. Think about LANKA SUPER DS. Caltex was trying to compete with it. But they lost the battle. Now what they have done Now caltex have bought Super DS and comes with both caltex and petroleum logo in the same can. See how caltex are trying to maximise their profits through political deals. IS that right?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Now we are going around the same point. You just don't give away Gov institutions to private companies like a family business. U have to set rules and regulations to avoid monopoly, protect consumer rights, employment rights etc..At the same time, Gov shd act like a watchdog. There shd be a governing body that stands above all. For an example I work in a path lab and there r 3 labs in the state. Gov won't allow any company to take over the other. There shd be 3 to compete against.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
How do you think, is our political system is in a position to act as a watch dog? We need a gang of strong watch dogs, but we don't have a good one, what we have is only a starving, weak one. So, can you identify the origin of the problem. Is it government institutions or political system?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Ofcourse it's the political system. Like I said we all know it's the political system. That's why I look at the policies of each political party. I fully supported the regaining SL economic policy of UNP back then. They did pretty good things to increase the economic growth. They didn't give Gov jobs coz the economy wasn't strong enough to accommodate more Gov servants. They privatised many institutions. But at the end, our ppl wanted the corrupted system. Now pay for the mistakes
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
If you say UNP is not a corrupted place, keep in mind a whole UNP bunch is with this government, including the past chief secretary SB. Government is a mix of all sorts of ideas, concepts, understandings, perceptions etc.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I never said or never will say that UNP is a clean party. I said, I supported their regaining SL policy. It's a great party compared to SLFP. But RW is ruining it. RW is also responsible for being a weak opposition leader. Gov is not a mix of ideas. Ex-UNPers who accused MR openly as Tsunami Hora r now saying MR is a clean man. I'm over that man. Kill all the bastards. We need fresh blood. Ppl shd wake up and think wisely. Who voted Paba, Sanath, Geetha, Ranjan?? Our stupid ppl.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I do agree. But my idea is people can be changed. I took the word mix not in the sense of good. mmm.... I would say government is a FRUIT SALAD. That is what I wanted to convey. Didn't do my communication right.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Yes but when will see that change. The rate we r going down as a nation shows that time is crucial to rectify things. We have gone beyond the limit where there's no come back. Even if we do, it will take 100 years to reach the level of a developed country. But again, I don't think it's possible in 100 years coz this system is like a cycle. Majority of our ppl love this system. All they want is, something for free from the Gov. They r like beggers. So wat can we do mate.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
You are saying a very sensitive thing, brother. When you are getting matured, you will feel and understand the weight of what you are saying. loosing your job is not that simple when you have a family to take care of, a decision which will effect to all of your dependents. Naming and shaming is not the answer for the problem. I never point my finger and blame them. I think you should think of correcting your approach. I will tell you another thing.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I didn't come to Aus with a job on my hand. I studies hard to get qualifications and I found the right job. Loosing a job is not easy and I know how it feels like coz I've been through that once. I didn't sit down and blame anybody but started looking for other jobs. I'm not the only person who lost a job in this world. Think maturely. u shd understand that life is not a bed full of roses. U have to expect the worst.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
One can call you as a person who is less patriotic. Why? Because you are staying in AUS, where the country has an acute necessity of the involvement of youth for development of the country after WAR. But I don't say like that. Because I am not narrow minded. Except for that, what I do is appreciate your interest on SL from over there, and you love to the motherland. You may be doing very little, but that bit also important. I believe in totality, togetherness, collectivity
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Why staying overseas is considered as less patriotic? I owe my country. I studied for free for 13 years thanks to tax payers. I wud love to come down and serve my own ppl. But I'm not willingly to insult myself n my qualifications. Can I get the right job in SL? No u need a letter from a minister. Do u get the right place? No, u have to work under a boss who hasn't even passed year 12 but has the back up from the minister. Do I get paid for what I do? NO, u'll just depend on parents
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I told you, that is not my way of thinking. A narrow minded person can think or say like that.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Dude, I've seen the world. I have visited 3rd world countries and developed countries. I've seen the difference. It's our ppl. The way our ppl think. They r not educated. They have been fooled for decades and it will be the same in the future. Look what's happening in SL. MR is taking down the country. He's not worried abt our problems but abt his presidency terms. I knew he's a not a man of word. Ppl laugh at Sri Lankans. They see things that our ppl don't see. It hurts but ?????
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Fourthly, the people who are talking for privatization says new new technology comes in to the country, which we say as CAPITAL in economics, with privatization. It may be in the concept. But not happened in SL. HOLCIM, DCSL, CHICO all three run with the same machinery which we had while they were state owned. So what these companies are doing? Do the invest for new machinery? No they do few changes in the management and earn profits. it is like profits without INVESTING
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Not always. Part of the contract might include the line "acquisition of all the assets and equipments". Basically they take over the operations. They have a plan that earn profits without investing. That's what u need when running an organisation. Politicians act like Professors in management and screw everything. Since we can't change that system, it's better to give it to someone who can actually do it. Politicians can poke their finger into Gov assets but not when its privatised
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
U hit the BULLS-EYE, great. All your thinking is based on one assumption. That is "Since we can't change that system" (your own words) that is the simple difference in you and me. Both of us identify the core problem is within the political system, you assume, one can't change that & tries to find alternatives due to that. In my case I believe that can be changed, that should be changed and it is the only solution, no alternative can provide results it only worsen the situation
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana U r right we both identify the core problem. But I don't really assume on the fact "Since we can't change the system". Our system is way too corrupted and the current politicians play the main role. When u say WE HAVE TO CHANGE, thousands will say NO WE DON'T HAVE TO COZ THIS IS THE BEST and WE ARE THE BEST. Another core problem that identified in our system is, LIN MADI ADAHAS. U believe that u can do it but remember SL is not democratic country. They will shut u off before u speak.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I will tell you another thing, this is on Railway. in railways maintaining track is the biggest cost. So the previous governments started discussions with companies to privatize the CGR. Where the discussion ended. The companies said they will take the Maradana and Fort railway stations. Why? because they are the major income generating points. What about the track? that has to be done by the government. Can U believe GOSL agreed on that also. But stopped by huge strikes.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I dunno much abt privatising Railway department but i do know that its loosing money in millions. Either we shd privatise the operations (Partial ownership) or have a deal with them to share the income to maintain the track. It can be done on the negotiating table. Public can protest without even knowing the deal. It can be an advantageous one to both parties.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Appreciate that you accept that you don't now about Railway. No dear, when the privatization discussions are going on, the companies always have the motivator of maximizing PROFIT to turn the table to their side. So the politicians have to have the PATRIOTISM to turn the. So these two forces create a balance in the final agreement. But you know SL has ran out of patriotic politicians. So end result if basically one sided. So, nothing wrong with the privatization concept.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Ok let's say that the end result is one sided. Is that a better result than letting the organisation to go bankrupt or unsuccessful in doing, what it is supposed to do to the public. For an example, If the railway department is not moving ahead to give a better service to the public, If the department is loosing money continuously, If the management can't handle it's operations efficiently, One more harm can it be done? Being patriotic is not a solution, be a smart negotiator
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
that is what is called RECTIFYING the government by people. Which can be done, and has been done.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
Respond to this video...RECTIFYING the Gov doesn't mean u go on a strike and stop what they are doing. I would interpret that as a way of getting the Gov on to the right track. For an example, if the transportation minister is over filling the department staff with his political henchmen, u have to protest against it and stop it. If u support his actions coz u get a job somehow and then shout against the privatisation of a tax money eater is not what I call "RECTIFYING".
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Striking is a one tool that can be used to put the governments to the right track. Even though it is rarely used for that purpose in SL. I am in the process of providing you facts, why I am against privatization in the present or previous context. (Present or previous governments) But remember I will not be against privatization in the future, if the environment gets changed to a position where it favours privatization. I don't consider privatization itself as a SIN.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Environment won't change under the current Gov coz they are against the privatisation like JVP. I think this is the best time for privatisation as we need to pay off all the debts we acquired during the war and there's no sign of any Gov organisation rising up with profits and also to end this corrupted system. If u go against the privatisation, leaving a treasure to corrupted politicians and a play ground for their henchmen, I don't think that environment is nowhere near.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Period dude. Have fun in SL.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Normally ppl r not saints like u think. If they r so pure, this world is gonna be a better place. But u r in a fantasy world. Australians can think of the same way. Why Lankans come here n grab our kids jobs n be in our job market. But they r smart. They let only professionals to come in n work for their country. Take me for an example. I studied upto year 12 for free n now working for Aussies. SL Gov got nothing back from me for what they spent on me. And there r heaps.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 So don't blame capitalism or muslim businessmen. If u can't live upto that u'll fail. It's called "Survival of the fittest". That's the problem in SL. Everyone goes by the books without understanding the system. Lee quan Yew developed S'gapore without economic books. He thought abt the location of S'gapore. He had a vision. He was honest. He loved the country. He didn't think abt his family to be in power like MR. He did what's best for the country. Noone in SL is doing that.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 No humanity or cultural value will prevail when ppl starve to death. When its extremely difficult to live. Ppl will start doing crimes to become rich. What wud u do if u see ur kids starving to death. R u gonna feed cultural values n humanity or do whatever u can to get some food ? I told u earlier that our ppl r weak and fooled by the cunning politicians. Since u can't change that fact, face the reality. SL is going down. UNP policies did work for SL
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 Mate look at the stats and then talk. Wat u believe is crap. My father thinks the same. Do u know how many Sri Lankan professionals apply for residency over here? Do u know how many Chinese students apply for residency here? Why ppl leave SL in boats to come to Aus. Mate ppl r not dumb to leave the country that they were born if they can have a good life and a future for their kids. They know that SL is no where near Aussie in many things. Don't speak if u r not sure
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@goodbyelonglive44 According to u, we shd shut the gates for Western countries. Then u have to shut the gates in SL and avoid ppl migrating to western countries. They migrate to Western countries bcoz there's no hope in SL and country is going down every day. First understand the word "Privatising". It doesn't mean u r selling the country but an organisation that belonged to the gov which is under performing. I don't care whether u like Germany or not coz it's irrelevant to wat we talk.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I didn't read all the heap of comments posted here. I am talking just about this particular comment on privatizing. Privatizing might be a good concept, but it is not due to what you mentioned. What you are saying is if the owners of the government institutions, which is the government is under performing, it is good to change the ownership for the betterment of that institute. That is not how we do things in life and it is also not the solution. I will give you an example.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Well one simple tip to ya dude..U can do whatever u want in your OWN life using ur OWN money. U can choose to loose money n continue investing money on something. This is a Gov and it belongs to the public. Don't take personal examples in your life to explain something that belongs to 2 Million people. I may chose to open up a business and If I don't do well I might sell it or try my best to succeed. I take the risk with my own money. So it's different.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Think your child is under performing in school exams, wold you change the ownership? That means do you give your child to a better or efficient father than yourself? Simply it is not the solution, because it is not the problem. If it is really a problem of yourself you try to change your behaviors. Then try to motivate the child. Simply apply that to privatizing. I hope you are not a father or mother who gives your child for someone, because your child is under performing.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Ur example is so irrelevant to this topic. But I'll take some part of it. If ur kid is under performing, u need to find out why? Where's the mistake? How to find a solution and stuff. If it's the father who's not being supportive to the kid, yes u have to change urself. I hope u don't choose to be the same father n let ur kid under perform for the rest of his life bcoz of ur mistake. Apply that to privatising now.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
You are supporting me, not talking against me. Think twice on what you mentioned. You didn't change the father(OWNERSHIP) of the child, but you changed the behavior of the father, or correct the father. So apply that to privatization. What you have to do is rectify the government but not the ownership of the institute.
But add something to that. If you are a person who sees that government cannot be rectified and we also can't do anything. Then you will see this as impractical.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I said ur example is not valid to begin with. So how wud I be able to support u? Rectify the Gov ?? Good luck with that mate...Most impractical line I've ever seen. I would love to see how u planning on that..
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
There is a famous saying "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." If you are in the side of GOOD, (I think that is so, according to what you are saying) Are you still thinking on maintaining silence. One more thing could you please name the country you are living in. Then i can directly answer you.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I'm living in Australia. Like I said, most of the Gov workers like this system coz they get paid for coming to work even though they do nothing. So they will support this system. Ppl who work for private companies work hard and get paid. At the end of the day ppl get paid but country is loosing money everyday. One happy country....
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I need nether your support nor your approval (Sorry about being blunt) to continue what I am doing. All what matters is whether you act for a cause or not. Until and unless you act, your words (only words) are useless. If you are up to a true cause, let me know, I will be by the side of you. Your radical words or ideas (if I think so) are contradicts with your sluggishness to acute yourself. That is a common disease in SL.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Have u ever seen what ppl do in SL to change this system. They protest, They shout, they will get attacked by the cops. At the end u get nothing. Ppl r so dumb in SL. They can be fooled very easily. They don't think long term opportunities. They just think what they got from this Gov. If u look at the Australian election. It was a hung parliament this time and ppl love it. Balance of power. In SL ?? Unofficial Dictatorship
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
We'll just think that all what you said is true. With all that, you can't say it is impossible to do some change. Simply ACT AND SEE. You will see the change. The main problem what I see in you (which has in many Sri lankans) you try to swim while staying on land. I will guarantee you that the change can occur even with all those circumstances. Because I am a person who is working in the ground level in villages. So I know this is your IGNORANCE. Ask me more, I will clarify.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
YOU, may be thinking we have nothing to do to rectify the government, so you see what I am saying as impractical. But that doesn't mean it is not a solution. Also remember it is your opinion and only yours.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I see the practical side of the privatisation. I live in a country where almost everything's privatised (Ofcourse the Gov has the control to avoid monopoly). Perfectly runs the country. No strikes, No lazy workers, No losses, Perfect service..Our uneducated ppl consider it as Selling public properties to private companies but not as a big change in order to reverse the whole process which makes it lot efficient and productive to the country. So u pick..
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@Rajadahana BTW, in ur example, Kid resembles the public, Father resembles the Gov I hope. In that scenario, kids have chosen many fathers and they have changed their fathers through out the history. Also the kid decides who's gonna be his father. So let's see an example which is relevant to this like LECO and electricity board. Why private company is profitable when the Elec board is loosing millions every year? R u telling me that it's ok to loose our tax money n let it be like that?
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I have to go to the rectify the mistakes we do in speaking. Because, this particular comment stuck go going around a misuse of words. There are two concepts as STATE and GOVERNMENT, remember there is a HUGE gap bet ween them. But in SL we use government for both. So actually, even though we say government owned institutions, actually it is STATE owned institutions. So there is still one farther, my example still stands. I would like to mention something on the mistake you did.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Well the state is governed by the Government. Government release funds to state. Gov has the control over state. It's the same thing even though it's two different words and Sri Lanka has only one state. We don't have many states like Aus, US or India..There's are no state Governments. So I dunno what u talking abt ? Maybe provincials ?? Districts ???
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I feel really sorry about doing this. I know this is not an English lesson. I don't want to insult your fluency in English. But these are the 2 definitions given by the Merry Webster dictionary, which is used by many.
GOVERNMENT - the act or process of governing; specifically : authoritative direction or control
STATE - a politically organized body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially : one that is sovereign
Can you pick the difference?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana U r insulting urself. Read my comment again n again until u understand what i mentioned. Two different words and there's no question abt that. Let's see according to ur dictionary. state is defined as a " occupying territory". So how many states do we have in Sri Lanka and which body govern them? U might be able to see the link between the state n Gov and also that it's the same in SL coz we have only ONE state government or territory.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I can't understand why you are defining territory as a part of a country (district, province or county). Country it self is a territory. It should be government controls or rules the state, not state government, because we are referring this to the country. Sorry, I don't want to explain the theories of political science in here. To end the conversation (because you are not familiar with the theoretical aspect of it) are two different concepts, according to Political Science.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Ur political concepts maybe right theoretically but not practically in SL. Not just that, there are many things that r not valid in SL politics. Who's the head of state? Who's the head of Gov? 2 different positions but same person bcoz Sri Lanka has no too many states. just one. If things go wrong within the state who's responsible?? Head of Government or head of state coz according to ur theory it's not the same.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I said from the very beginning it is it is two concepts in POLITICAL SCIENCE. So don't call it YOUR theory, what you are doing here is challenging theories in Political Science, I would like to stress the word science. So I wish you all the best on that and hope you will come up with a thesis or a book which explains your new theory. You may be awarded a Doctorate for that, but my advice is to study and understand the prevailing theory before doing that.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I have no interest in political science so i don't think I need ur advices or concepts in political science. Use ur big knowledge to do something worth for SL. U know ur knowledge and big theories have no values when it comes to SL politics. So far u cudn't even explain me why Elec board is loosing when LECO is earning. Apply those political science theories and explain how smart u r..I'm sure u'll end up with an answer of a 5th grader.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Unless you really want to continue your arguments or concepts on STATE and GOVERNMENT, I don't want to continue that, further we go, it will further elaborate on your ignorance in political science. If I try to answer your question in here, it would be a start of a long lesson on political science. I don't want to do that, because it is not the place. So do your homework in political science before commenting. Also, all what you see, feel, think, believe, talk are not THEORIES
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana No need to argue mate..U r one of those guys who read books and books and books until u die. But no common sense at all..I've seen ppl like u who talk theories and concepts which are pretty useless when it comes down to action. u guys r the dumbest coz everything is not on the book. Be real..
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
1. What should I say, when you misunderstand. When I say I don't want to give lectures, You say I don't want your lectures. So we are saying the same thing
2. When I say these theories are not mine, you continue using the word "YOUR THEORY"
3. This is the first time i hear an idea which sounds like, privitising has nothing to do with politics
4. i can't imagine how a person in AUS can be realistic on SL than a person who is working in the ground level
Rajadahana 1 year ago
1.First u shd understand that I'm not here to hear ur lectures, So no point in saying I don't want to give u lectures.
2. Theory might not be urs but when u quote it, it comes as ur theory coz u brought it up to discussion. Doesn't necessarily mean u created it. But u r using it.
3. Privatising has something to do with economic strategic plans. But ur concepts n definitions in political science such as wat's STATE n GOV has nothing to do with Privatising.
4. Coz I'm not a LIDE INNA GEMBEK.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
You are making a fundamental, simple and crude error of the USER automatically becomes the OWNER. It happened in to two occasions, one regarding the head of state and the head of the government, two regarding the phrase YOUR THEORIES. Privatizing is concept which always involves government and state. Giving the ownership of your business to someone (may be to your brother) is not privatizing.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I will do something which you don't like. I will give the definition of privatization - endorsing / assigning the ownership of a public property/business to a private party. So the involvement of the state/government cannot be eliminated when we talk about privatizing. As humans we make our little worlds in our minds. That doesn't need to match with what is outside. What you have understood is not what really is PRIVATIZATION. Don't worry, those things happens to all of us.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
one more thing, I will assure U that U can't see the holistic picture of SL while staying in AUS. Simply because U have to depend on news, views and information which are definitely polluted according to the individual who is providing them. I have first hand experiences on people, their problems and the current situation; because analyzing them is included to my job. So again I say it shows your IGNORANCE on the ground situation in SL, but I am sure U R not LINDE INNA GEMBEK
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I do have first hand experience too. My parents still live in SL. I can depend on the info they passed on to me. All I'm asking u is, what reason u got to say that "privatisation" is not a good economic plan for SL if that particular institution continuously under performs due to management efficiency which is driven by corrupted Gov politicians. Since u can't change it and majority likes it, sit down n talk abt theories until a God comes down n develop SL over night.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
One definition to answer your question (first hand experience) - experience etc that has been learned or gained by doing something yourself
I don't know how you do above mentioned through your parents. Mistakes all around, I can't imagine what to do???
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I was born in SL and brought up in SL for 21 years. That's why I said I've first hand experience in SL. When I moved to AUS, I got first hand experience in AUS and I can compare the systems that I have experienced in both countries. I can sort of see the problems that causes inefficiency in SL and productivity in AUS which is currently ranked 2nd in world for Human Development Index. Man U r a walking dictionary haha. No wonder u r a POTH GULLEK..
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
OYAAMA NEEDA MAMA first hand experience GENA KIWWAHAMA, AMMAI THATTHAI INNAWA EGOLLANGEN WISTHARA DENAGANNAWA KIWWE? ARA OYA MATA PAVICHCHI KARAPU WACHANE brain damage METHANDI OYATAMA PAWICHCHI KALAHEKI.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana MAMA LANKAWE 21 YEARS INNA KOTA FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE GATHTHA KIYANA EKAI LANKA WE NATHI KAALE PARENTS LAGEN WISTHARA DANA GATHTHA KIYANA EKAI THERUM GANNA BARI HINDA THAMAI OYAGE BRAIN DAMAGE KIWWE. OYATA MONA PART EKA DA THERENNE NATHTHE EKE?? OYA MULU RATEMA WISTHARA DANA GANNE RATA WATE GIHIN DA? NATHTHAM MEDIA EKEN DA??
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
OYAA WEDAKARANNE AUSSI WALA GAL KORIYAKA NEME NEEDA? OYAA GE OYA BORU TIKA GALAK ISSARAHATA GIHIN KIWWOTH GAL TIKA KADAGATTHAHAKI. Do I need to write what actually happend,
STEP 1 : I said first hand then you said you get information from your parents
STEP 2 : I said what is the meaning of first hand then you said you were in Sri Lanka for 21 years.
MONAWADA MACHANG PODI LAMAI WAGEENE. OYA AWURUDU 21 KATHAWAK KIWWE, MAMA first hand KIYANNE MENNA MEEKAI KIWWATA PASSENE.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana MAMA KIWWA MATATH FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE THIYENAWA. MATA MAGE PARENTS LAGEN NEWS LABENEWA KIYALATH KIWWA. LANKA WE FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE GANNA LANKA WE INNA KOTAI AUS EXPERIENCE GANNE MEHE INNA KOTAI KIYALA OYATA THERENNE NATHTHAM OYAGE METER EKE UPSET EKAK. EKAI MAMA SUDDA SINHALEN KIWWE MAMA 21 YEARS HITIYE LANKA WE KIYALA. ANEH MANDA THAAMA THERUNADA KIYALA. MAMA DAAPU COMMENT EKE FIRST LINE EKA AYE KIYAWANNA. NATHTHAM MAMA COPY PASTE KARANNA DA? OYA MENTAL CASE EKAK NEH
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I do have first hand experience too. My parents still live in SL. I can depend on the info they passed on to me.
Alright, sorry for understanding according to English. Next time, put a word like ALSO, before the second sentence.,that is better English. Then the receiver knows you are talking about two points. If not it sounds like you are talking about the same thing. I said even earlier that, the little world having inside your mind doesn't always match with the outside world.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Well I didn't use the word BCOZ in between. Two different sentences. I didn't know that u use formal English in youtube. Read ur definition again. U can't get first hand experience from ur parents dumbo. I can't help it if u think like a dumb person and assume everyone's dumb like u. I don't use formal Eng in youtube. U might have realised that I use just "u" instead of using "you". Do u know why? Bcoz there's a word limitation in youtube. I live in Aus and have no prob with my Eng.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
Respond to this video...
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
When I talk about without and less, it is "professor talk" for you. When I talk about "also" it is formal English for you. And just read my comment few minutes back, did I say you are "wrong" no, I used the word "better" so there is no need to jump up furiously.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I said I don't use formal English here to limit the number of characters which means I accepted that I didn't use ALSO and pu a full stop. At the same time I didn't use the word BCOZ so u don't get the wrong message. But somehow u got it wrong. Anyway back to Privatisation mate..Which party is involved in privatising Gov assets?
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Is that all you have to say on n.privatization? Actually the purpose of that question is not clear, but privatization was done by both SLFP and UNP, they are the only parties who had govern this county up to now, aren't they?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Rajadahana "n. privatization is different from what is prevailing in the world which we living in. It need not to have the involvement of the government or state" Why did u say it need NOT to have the involvement of the GOV/STATE?? Now u r saying it's done by the parties who had govern this country? Basically it's the GOV/STATE. It could be a SLFP or UNP Gov which is not the question. First u said GOV need NOT to have involvement n now u r saying it's the GOV who's done it. WTF ???
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@naughtyboyya
why did you make this a spam, you can use the remove button, if you want to remove your comment.
Forntunately, Youtube doesn't delete previous comments, if not I couldn't have done this. These are your own words.
"if u start loosing money from ur business and dunno how to get it back on to the track or have no funds to get it back on to the track u might sell it to a person who can do that".
Who is telling what????
Rajadahana 1 year ago
Did I the person who say Government or state is not involved in PRIVITISING???? You even use the word "WTF" to express yourself. What an utter misunderstanding. You are asking me the questions which I asked from you earlier, why is that???
Read and understand my statement, if I am a baby you are still not born.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Look at my comment
"n. privatization is different from what is prevailing in the world which we living in. It need not to have the involvement of the government or state"
What refers to "it" in here - n.privatization
What is n.privatization? naughtyboyya's privatization
What is naughtyboyya's privetization? It is a concept in the mind of naughtyboyya about a process which is different from the privatization which we know.
WHAT AN IDIOT.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Just to show u how much of an idiot u r. n.privatisation always stated that the involvement of the GOV or the STATE. So how did u come up with the concept that n.privatisation need NOT to have involvement of GOV/STATE ???
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Fully agreed, I am an IDIOT due to the reasons I mentioned.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Alright sir, tell me according to the little world inside your head, what do you understand as "privatization" I would like to name it as n. privatization with your consent (naughtyboyya's privatization). because n. privatization is different from what is prevailing in the world which we living in. It need not to have the involvement of the government or state. So first describe what YOU imagine, feel, hallucinate or understand as n. privatization. (naughtyboyya in wonderland)
Rajadahana 1 year ago
Comment removed
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@Rajadahana This is interesting. Ok let's say for an example, privatisation of railway department due to its poor management system. Who's getting involved in that process? ur family?or the Gov of Sri Lanka as it is a key department under the ministry of transport? From what I understand n.Privatisation refers to transfer of any government function to the private sector. There are many ways of privatising. I personally think "Partial ownership" is the best for SL like Emirates.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Alright, go ahead I need more clarification on n.privatization. I didn't know my family is also featuring in "naughtyboyya in wonderland" story. :-)
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana U r such a baby...I simply mentioned that the GOV must involve in the process of privatisation. I expect u to come up with an answer to show me that it's NOT. U believe that privatisation can be done without the involvement of the GOV/STATE..Too bad u cudn't understand the sarcasm when I dropped the line which means 'If it's not Gov is it ur family that involves". Did u get it baby?
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Ok I got it, sorry, My family is not featuring in "naughtyboyya in wonderland", I feel you are very serious about your little world. I got it UNCLE, go ahead tell me more on n.privatization.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Answer to my question pls. I'm not interested in your stupid family Mr.Genuis. Which party is involved in Privatisation?
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
I agreed on that once. So tell me more on n.privatization.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana There's nothing more to tell as long as u agreed to my point. Since u agreed that STATE/ GOV shd involve in privatising but not ur family, wat else u want me to say. Oh maybe something like "WHY THE HELL DID I WASTE MY TIME WITH THIS DUMBO"...Well that's something I wud actually say now n leave. Thanks for wasting my time..Hav fun..
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Thanks mate for sharing your thoughts, but I have to say that this is the first time I have come across a person with many misunderstandings and misconceptions, who cannot and don't have the willingness to understand them. Never met this kind among SL community. If it is your will to do so, we'll conclude this, have a nice day, wishing you to enjoy the day to its maximum.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana Thanks dude. I have to say the same. Good luck with ur researching stuff. Hope u'll become the President of Sri Lanka one day (I'M HALLUCINATING NOW) and develop SL with ur knowledge in economic theories. Oh before that try ur best on rectifying the Gov. On the day u become successful, simply drop a msg to me. Sri Lanka needs ppl like u. Better stay in SL. Never ever think of moving to Aus not even in a boat. I don't wanna see a SL in Aus. Good luck again.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Up to now I tied to continue this discussion with respect, because you are elder than me. But see what you are doing, BAALANSA PANTHIYE PODIEKEK WAGENE NODANNA DEWAL GENA BORU PANDITHAKAM KIYAWANAWANNE.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana OYA DANNA BAWA PENNANNA GIHIN NONDI WENEWA NEH. I can't help it if u keep typing definitions like a University Prof for every word I say. OYAGE PANDITHA TALKS HODAI UNION WALATA.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
NARIYA MIDI THITTHAI KIWWA WAGE 2.50 WEDANE OYAATE THIYENNE. You started the talk like an INTELLECTUAL. You tried to say some of the things which you don't know to show that you are a briny person. So answered you accordingly.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana MAMA DANNE NATHI EWA PENNANNE NAH. MAMA OKKOMA DANNETH NAHA. OYA WAGE ECONOMIC EXPERT KENEKUTH NEWEI. HABAI LANKAWE INNA PANDITHAYO SET EKA WADA KARANA THEORY EKATA PIN SIDDA WENNA API THAWA AWURUDU 50 KATAWATH DEVELOPED COUNTRY KIYANA NAMA GANNA EKA DREAM EKAK.OYA OLUWEN HITA GATHTHATH EKA MEH KAPEDI WENNE NAH. MOKO APE EWUN ECONOMIC THEORIES DANNAWA WADI. UN HITHANNE API THAMAI PORAWAL KIYALA. HABAI RATA RUN KARANNE WESTERN RATAWAL DENA LOANS WALIN. MARU SHOK
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
AAYETH KOLLA BORU KIYANAWANE, "MAMA DANNE NATHI EWA PENNANNE NAH". privatization KIYANNE MOKADDA KIYALA EGENA KIYANNA GIYE MAMADA? API INNE 21st century WALA EKA NISA scientist LA atom EKA DEKALATHIYANAWA KIYALA ANAAGATTHE MAMADA?
Rajadahana 1 year ago
Comment removed
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
May be then we would be able to come to an agreement. So could you please explain me the concept of n.privatization.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
OYA MEEWAGE KATHA KARANNA AKAMETHI KIYALA KIWWANANG APITH MULA INDALAMA SINHALEN TALK EKA DENAWANE. Without going for these discussions in a scientific manner.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana I didn't really see any scientific notations from u at all. From the beginning u were giving me some whole bunch of definitions using a dictionary. RATAKATA ONE WADA KARANNA PULUWAN MINISSU MISAK THEORY WALIN RATA RUN KARANA MINISSU NEWEI. EKA APE EDUCATION SYSTEM EKE WARADDA. GODA IDAN PEENANNA IGENA GANNAWA WAGE WADAK. OYA DANNA THEORIES DAALA LANKA WA GODA GATHTHA DAATA MAMA FULL RESPECT EKA DENEWA. OYA IGENA GATHTHA THEORY LANKA WATA VALID NAH.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
ANNA AAYETH KOLLA ANAAGTTHA, MAMA KIWWE scientific discussion EKEK KARANA WIDIHA. NETHUWA science GENA KARANA KATHAWAK NEME. LOOKE ALUTH DEYAK HITHAPU, KARAPU HEMOTAMA OYAGOLLO WAGE AYA HEMADAAMA KIWWE OOKA THAMA. PULUWANNAM KARALA "PENNAPANKO, EITA PASSE APITH SAPORT". DEYAK KARALA IWARA UNATA PASSE, WENA support EKAK OONE NEENE MACHANG, KARANNA KALING MISAK.
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana MAMA DANNAWA OYATA SCIENCE BARI BAWA EKANE ARA NUCLEAR STRUCTURE EKAK GANA KIYANNA GIHIN MAGEN AHAGATHTHE. SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION EKAK KARADDI ONE MONADA KIYALA DANNE NATHIWA WORDS WALA DEFINITIONS DICTIONARY EKAK BALA BALA DENA OYA EKKA MONA SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS DA. KARANNA PULUWAN DEYAK NAM APITH SUPPORT. EKA THAMAI MAMA KIYANNE PRIVATISE KARAPAN KIYALA. OYA KIYANNE GOV EKA RECTIFY KARANNA KIYALA. MAHINDA GE PUTHA OYA NAM MATA PODDAK HITHALA BALANNA PULUWAN SUPPORT EKAK DENNA
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
Sorry boss, that is pure misunderstanding, regarding seeing the atomic structure. Anyway I may be wrong, just send me the source that you got to know on the microscope which shows the atomic structure. I will rectify my self, not like you. Is it in Australia? :-DDD
Rajadahana 1 year ago
@Rajadahana "This is 21st century mate. U can talk abt atomic structure using NMR spectra. U can't see nuclear particles but we know how to determine atomic structure of molecules". This is exactly wat said. u can't see them but they exist and can be determine using a NMR spectra. Not just in Aus even in SL if u have some tertiary education in Chemistry. I didn't even use the word Microscope u dumbo. Pls don't try to show ur stupidity here with things that I didn't even say.
naughtyboyya 1 year ago
@naughtyboyya
So we'll go back to the starting point. Just tell me, have anyone seen the atomic structure or hallucinated (the word which you used).
Rajadahana 1 year ago