In the Monsterquest Episode "Critical Evidence" it is discovered the camera lens most debunkers believe was used is wrong, and the actual size of the creature is in excess of seven feet tall. Seven foot two to seven foot six in fact.
Besides, there is more than one creature in the video. Watch my video evidence titled New Patterson Evidence.
GhettoSven is just a school kid pretending to be a scientist on YouTube! It's his hobby! Real scientists with real observations don't post on YouTube. Now go play with friends Sven, you're bothering us.............................................
Tell us about your belief in human-bigfoot crossbreeds and the government cover ups around it. I found your story being very hilarious and entertaining.
Everyone gives a different height. Everyone. whos method is correct ? i dont beleive any of them. bigfoot ,even mature bigfoot can range in size. they are not all super tall. they are like humans . on average they may grow taller ... but what the heck do i know. i don't even know if they exist.
actually... i do appreciate your mathematics..but if you're going by this one frame, i think you're still cutting the height far too short.. the "object?" is walking forward, in a complete lunge, with it's head down and forward...saying, that if you had the object standing straight and still, it appears that it would be closer to your "6'9"" target... not saying that i believe in bigfoot, one way or the other...but i am fascinated by it!
imsocool he has no real facts or proof he's got all these dumb ideas in his head and trys to debunk something that is real and has yet to be proofen other wise lots of these guys on the net.
Even more important is... "why are they so afraid?" I think that it goes back deep into early human history, where there was a genuine fear of both the unknown and of large animals, like say a huge cave bear. So, it's a type of phobia.
Monsterquest reanalized it and found out that in the previous attempts to measure the height of patty, they assumed that the video was taken with the wrong camera lense. They switched it and found out that patty is inbeetween 7 feet 2 inches and 7 foot 6 inches tall.
And Manitoban1, don't go around trying to insult people. It's wrong.
The Head is not balanced on a human sized neck, it is leening forward. The head comes out more to the front of it's body and the top of the spine is bent. It would be taller in ratio to a man if it was standing with a straighter back and foot to shoulder was what was being measured.
Funny how most bigfoot reports always claim the sasquatch is between 7 and 8 feet tall..but when the picture is broken down it falls well within human Range!..Nothing In the PGF screams Realism when the film is studied...nice work Sven.
Another attempted film smear by the NSA. Why don't you just tell everyone that Bigfoot is top secret and then tell them to go about their busines? This film smear is concocted bunk. No proof is presented. No techniques are described. We are asked to believe the smear artist, based on his say so of how tall he says Patty is. If Patty is only 74" tall, then the suit would have shown up by now, since more people could have used it. But the alleged Patty suit has never surfaced.
Cheers from Spain, Ghettosven, you've done a good work here, and I think I've got your idea. But, have you considered the fact that the subject of this footage does not walk totally upright? I saw in other related videos that it strides with its knees bent while its torso is leaning forwards, so the estimation of its size would not be that accurate with this picture, maybe. There is another estimation made in a NASI (?) report. Anyway, yours is a clever idea. Cheers.
Thanks for the first serious comment on this video.
The bent position of the creature I have considered in every calculation.
What you see in this video is only my first attempt. I have studied it further. Some of the material is on my homepage in my profile, but the most of my work I have not had time to write down on my page.
The NASI estimation of 7'3" is a rough contradiction to all later studies from many independent workers. Moreover; the NASI result includes no error estimation!
I have compared other workers similar methods to my work. Furthermore I have studied the famous McClarin comparison video.
My result so far is:
According to the footprint size the creature is about 5'9"-6'4".
According to the McClarin movie the creature is about 6'3"-6'7".
The only way Patty can survive is to put her close to 6'3". Otherwise there will be contradictions. This height happens to match Bob Heironimus. I estimate Bob would be about 6'2"-6'6" in shoes, helmet, and top crest.
You're going to have to do one of your fancey equations for us sven to show how you got 71 to 76 pixels from a picture containing 25 megapixels of information. That's 25 million pixels, I'm betting her foot is longer than a mere 76 pixels in the frame. Try again.
Don't you understand the picture is converted to jpg? Hence it's 325x400=0,13 megapixels only. That's also more than enough for my calculations, each pixel is only about 1/5 of an inch in real scale!
Your bad math skills also come out here again. If your claim was correct Patty would be 23meters=75feet tall according to my equation. Where is you understanding of proportions?
I'm sorry dragon.
You make serious errors on secondary school level on regular basis.
Joeyvader is on weak high school level general science and on secondary school level in math. Hence he doesn't understand my work. It's strange and remarkable you refer to joeyvader?
Not only is this Bigfoot study a math-physics work. It has more and more turned out to be a broad study of the social educational level of the Bigfoot community. I have actually graded your buddies from YouTube. Not a single one shows science skills on high school level; you can read about this later in my report.
Yeah, I understand the grey scientific truth is often dull. I know you were looking for some exciting Bigfoot fantasies, and then you end up on this a grey boring science result. I'm sorry for that.
The Bigfoot movement drafts their supporters among bored youngsters looking for some kicks in life.
Did you read my work? Or you dont grasp applied math on high school level?
NOTE: This is a video under the category "Education", not under "Entertainment", so I'm sorry but I didn't fool you.
internet says bob height is 6'.
costume designer munns did 3D computer analysis of the bluff creek area using same camera as patterson and came up with 7'2''.
cqpate 2 years ago
In the Monsterquest Episode "Critical Evidence" it is discovered the camera lens most debunkers believe was used is wrong, and the actual size of the creature is in excess of seven feet tall. Seven foot two to seven foot six in fact.
Besides, there is more than one creature in the video. Watch my video evidence titled New Patterson Evidence.
mgoose1nj 2 years ago
GhettoSven is just a school kid pretending to be a scientist on YouTube! It's his hobby! Real scientists with real observations don't post on YouTube. Now go play with friends Sven, you're bothering us.............................................
kapacon 2 years ago
Kapacon;
Tell us about your belief in human-bigfoot crossbreeds and the government cover ups around it. I found your story being very hilarious and entertaining.
GhettoSven 2 years ago
So what are your thoughts now that Monster Quest has shown that the Bigfoot creature in the Patterson footage has been measured at 7'3?
fkovacs1 2 years ago
Everyone gives a different height. Everyone. whos method is correct ? i dont beleive any of them. bigfoot ,even mature bigfoot can range in size. they are not all super tall. they are like humans . on average they may grow taller ... but what the heck do i know. i don't even know if they exist.
tonyagrestic 2 years ago
I don't think this claim holds cuz its not like the foot of the creature in the film is exactly 12 inches long. I mean, come on!
Wushu17 2 years ago
actually... i do appreciate your mathematics..but if you're going by this one frame, i think you're still cutting the height far too short.. the "object?" is walking forward, in a complete lunge, with it's head down and forward...saying, that if you had the object standing straight and still, it appears that it would be closer to your "6'9"" target... not saying that i believe in bigfoot, one way or the other...but i am fascinated by it!
revskull 2 years ago
imsocool he has no real facts or proof he's got all these dumb ideas in his head and trys to debunk something that is real and has yet to be proofen other wise lots of these guys on the net.
Manitoban1 2 years ago
Interesting reasoning and analysis.
GhettoSven 2 years ago
Even more important is... "why are they so afraid?" I think that it goes back deep into early human history, where there was a genuine fear of both the unknown and of large animals, like say a huge cave bear. So, it's a type of phobia.
thirdpositionist 2 years ago
Monsterquest reanalized it and found out that in the previous attempts to measure the height of patty, they assumed that the video was taken with the wrong camera lense. They switched it and found out that patty is inbeetween 7 feet 2 inches and 7 foot 6 inches tall.
And Manitoban1, don't go around trying to insult people. It's wrong.
imsocool213 2 years ago
The Head is not balanced on a human sized neck, it is leening forward. The head comes out more to the front of it's body and the top of the spine is bent. It would be taller in ratio to a man if it was standing with a straighter back and foot to shoulder was what was being measured.
imsocool7222 2 years ago
Yes, you are right, the head is tilting forward. That is however considered in this analysis.
I have also made a 3-dimensional analysis of the ape. It yielded 63.
You have a good point, but I think you have not understood the method to all its details.
My homepage is down at the moment due to server change. It will however be up soon again. There you can view my 3-dimensional calculation.
GhettoSven 2 years ago
garbage once again, your attempts are all bogus, listen to the experts. Its real get over it.
Manitoban1 2 years ago
Which experts? I'm an expert.
You are worse than dragon. You don't even claim anything, you just talk like a secondary school drop out.
I can claim that Einstein's equation E=mcc makes no sense. It's all bogus. But what does the claim prove?
GhettoSven 2 years ago
Funny how most bigfoot reports always claim the sasquatch is between 7 and 8 feet tall..but when the picture is broken down it falls well within human Range!..Nothing In the PGF screams Realism when the film is studied...nice work Sven.
ALLENMUSKY 3 years ago
Another attempted film smear by the NSA. Why don't you just tell everyone that Bigfoot is top secret and then tell them to go about their busines? This film smear is concocted bunk. No proof is presented. No techniques are described. We are asked to believe the smear artist, based on his say so of how tall he says Patty is. If Patty is only 74" tall, then the suit would have shown up by now, since more people could have used it. But the alleged Patty suit has never surfaced.
screamdr 3 years ago
Hey dumbass...
The suit was thrown away ofr obvious reasons. This was a money scam by Patersin, DeAtley, and Gimlin.
Research, kiddie, research....
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Cheers from Spain, Ghettosven, you've done a good work here, and I think I've got your idea. But, have you considered the fact that the subject of this footage does not walk totally upright? I saw in other related videos that it strides with its knees bent while its torso is leaning forwards, so the estimation of its size would not be that accurate with this picture, maybe. There is another estimation made in a NASI (?) report. Anyway, yours is a clever idea. Cheers.
eljorge01 3 years ago
Thanks for the first serious comment on this video.
The bent position of the creature I have considered in every calculation.
What you see in this video is only my first attempt. I have studied it further. Some of the material is on my homepage in my profile, but the most of my work I have not had time to write down on my page.
The NASI estimation of 7'3" is a rough contradiction to all later studies from many independent workers. Moreover; the NASI result includes no error estimation!
GhettoSven 3 years ago
I have compared other workers similar methods to my work. Furthermore I have studied the famous McClarin comparison video.
My result so far is:
According to the footprint size the creature is about 5'9"-6'4".
According to the McClarin movie the creature is about 6'3"-6'7".
The only way Patty can survive is to put her close to 6'3". Otherwise there will be contradictions. This height happens to match Bob Heironimus. I estimate Bob would be about 6'2"-6'6" in shoes, helmet, and top crest.
GhettoSven 3 years ago
what where you gonna do that friday.go trick or treating.hahaha.nerd
bullseyehitta 3 years ago
Uh, still hangover :| Don't drink, it makes you dull.
You better take school seriously boy. Otherwise you'll end up in fantasies like the angry clueless posters in this thread.
Take this as an advice boy. Good luck.
GhettoSven 3 years ago
You're going to have to do one of your fancey equations for us sven to show how you got 71 to 76 pixels from a picture containing 25 megapixels of information. That's 25 million pixels, I'm betting her foot is longer than a mere 76 pixels in the frame. Try again.
dragonsidheblade 3 years ago
LOL I'm sorry dragon.
Don't you understand the picture is converted to jpg? Hence it's 325x400=0,13 megapixels only. That's also more than enough for my calculations, each pixel is only about 1/5 of an inch in real scale!
Your bad math skills also come out here again. If your claim was correct Patty would be 23meters=75feet tall according to my equation. Where is you understanding of proportions?
I'm sorry dragon.
You make serious errors on secondary school level on regular basis.
GhettoSven 3 years ago
Joeyvader handed you your ass on a platter everytime you opened that festering hole in your head with your ridiculous claims of Height sven :)
Exciter1000 3 years ago
Joeyvader is on weak high school level general science and on secondary school level in math. Hence he doesn't understand my work. It's strange and remarkable you refer to joeyvader?
Not only is this Bigfoot study a math-physics work. It has more and more turned out to be a broad study of the social educational level of the Bigfoot community. I have actually graded your buddies from YouTube. Not a single one shows science skills on high school level; you can read about this later in my report.
GhettoSven 3 years ago
my god you're boring
simonjacks1986 3 years ago
Yeah, I understand the grey scientific truth is often dull. I know you were looking for some exciting Bigfoot fantasies, and then you end up on this a grey boring science result. I'm sorry for that.
The Bigfoot movement drafts their supporters among bored youngsters looking for some kicks in life.
Did you read my work? Or you dont grasp applied math on high school level?
NOTE: This is a video under the category "Education", not under "Entertainment", so I'm sorry but I didn't fool you.
GhettoSven 3 years ago
did you do distance also ???????
sintown13 3 years ago