Added: 2 years ago
From: tigernov6
Views: 165,357
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (240)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Who the hell disliked this? Oh yeah, jealous twerps who didn't think of it themselves.

  • @metalrulez4evr Fans of ancient aliens.

  • Our ancestors were primitive, but they were not idiots.

  • but his passion is lifting heavy items!!!!! 0o

  • The Wadsworth Constant applies

  • @ZFerret I got," rick rolled. "

  • Right... so they had nice flat concrete roads, like this guy is using, to move the stones 4,500 years ago?

    Of course not. The pivot stones would've just sunk into the mud/grass/soil.

    F

    A

    I

    L

  • @MisterDogshit

    Have you heard of erosion? I'm sure those stones could get some serious erosion over 4,500 years.

  • @Creativeffectstudios Are you fucking retarded? There were no flat concrete, or stone, roads 4500 years ago. It's as simple as that!

  • @MisterDogshit

    Well first off, they only show a concrete "road" once, and it was his back porch. Besides that, he never uses flat concrete surfaces besides the obvious stone blocks. And yes, concrete was most definitely being used 4,500 years ago.

    I don't see why you even had to mention flat concrete roads. Just because he's using a concrete slab doesn't mean he's implying they used them 4,500 years ago.

  • @Creativeffectstudios First off, concrete was invented by the Romans about 2000 years ago (2500 after stonehenge). The reason I mentioned it is because his technique literally pivots on using a flat, hard and durable surface to balance a X-ton block of stone on a pebble.

    Secondly, your claim that Britain had "primative stone pathways" 4,500 years ago is laughable, if we did we would find archaeological evidence of them - we don't.

    So in summary, you most definitely ARE fucking retarded!

  • @MisterDogshit

    When in that sentence did I use the word "Britain"? I mentioned that there were stone pathways back then, but nothing about Britain. You're honestly freaking out, all I said was that the stones weren't flat because of erosion. I haven't fought on the internet in a few years, and I regret doing it now. I forgot that 80% of the people on Youtube are immature.

  • @Creativeffectstudios Britain? Stonehenge is in Britain.

  • @MisterDogshit he said none lmao

  • @MisterDogshit

    Not sure if troll or just Youtube commenter.

  • @asdfzxc920Not sure if some randomly named user or alt account

  • @MisterDogshit

    They didn't even have to have flat concrete surfaces back then, anyways. They had primitive stone pathways which could have had the same effect with a bit more difficulty. You're forgetting that this guy's doing it alone just to make a point. There was likely more than 1 person who made the Stonehenge. Honestly you just made a moot point, and calling me "fucking retarded" won't make you look any more right than I am.

  • How'd they get them to lay on top of each other, though?

  • @UnknownXV

    That's exactly what I was thinking!!

    Ok, the guy put the "rock" standing, now go there and put something on top of it!

    Putting the things standing is the easiest thing, and he took all of that to show, but the difficult part he just skips !?

    Totally fail!!

    A good guy on moving rocks, that's all, but far from StoneHenge

  • now lets see him get the multi tone blocks onto the top like stone henge without any machinery ... also lets see him quarry them thousands of miles away and transport them there and how about use stone thats not light concrete ... lets see him do this with granite and Diorite ... this video only proves you can lean a block into the ground nothing else, it doesn't even show you how he got the block on top of that seesaw .... this is ridiculous lol, doesn't solve anything.

  • another nail in the coffin for all the extraterrestrials nuts lol

  • Also I came up with the first idea too, but I thought this was already discovered :)

    This guy is awesome!

  • Stonehendge reloaded haha

  • I love how supportive this guy's family is. That's really awesome, what good people.

  • wadsworth constant applies

  • this stupid redneck doesn't notice that he is doing every movement on smooth concrete. there is no smooth concrete on the floor at stonehenge.

  • @WhiteKnightDubstep You've just watched a guy move stones under his own ingenuity and strength that would otherwise take serious heavy machinary to move and you have the fucking ignorance to call him a "stupid redneck"? All because you think you know the full history to Stonehenge? Go back to wanking over Skrillex or some shit, cunt.

  • @YOUNOTCOOKING This guy's way of moving heavy objects in the 21st century certainly is ingenious... but it has got nothing to do with Stonehenge. ALL of the stones you see him move are on smooth concrete bases. If the people who built Stonehenge used anything similar we would expect to find archaeological evidence to support the fact. We don't.

  • You don't have to use smooth concrete.. -.-

  • Let's go Tropics

  • Very cool!

  • not trying to diss the man. great stuff. but the only thing is they did it on grass. the weight of the block would sink the pebble into the soil so it wouldnt move at all :/

  • @mbhatt8 it is not that hard to put something down to redistribute the weight over a large area.

  • @mbhatt8 ever heard of excavation and importing soil and then replanting grass?

  • How does he get the 3rd block that sits on top of the two that are standing up?

  • @ehou the first technique that got the block 3 ft in the air could take one to the height of vertical rocks. Getting on top of 2 rocks might be harder tho :P

  • @axle121 Ya that's the one I'm curious about...you can't wiggle your way up there

  • @ehou Get the top into position first, tip the bottom 2 and get those into position, and finally drop the top one on top is my best guess.

  • @axle121 not if he implemented one of his rolling techniecs they showed in the beginning jack it up and roll it over somehow

  • @ehou imagine getting the first one in place with scaffolding then dropping the other in on the sides and lowering it down

  • This was over 2 years ago now, is he done?

  • 240p we fucking meet again.

  • This guy is quite an incredible thinker. I have great respect for him.

  • In 4000 years when archaeologist find these blocks they will have no idea wtf it was doing there.

  • one question, who the fuck gave his these blocks to move? probably aliens :P

  • SCIENCE

  • this guys just a jizzbag

  • theres a self absorbtion behind a smug wisdom

  • My question: How did he get the the first piece of wood under the huge block?

  • @scooped13 He could have rolled it on using the technique he showed first.

  • @scooped13 Couldn't have done it without the help of an alien, that's my guess.

  • I heard that Wally IS an Alien.

  • fuckin awesome....

    

  • Unbelievable how people insist on alien involvement when there is not a single plausible piece of evidence suggesting it. Anywhere. Ever. Lol. And the comments are full of questions supposed to disprove the theory when they would have said this would never work before they saw it. Get over it. This is one man who figured out something you never could. He could figure out how to move it across even ground and then you'll harass him about the weight. He'll lift more weight and it won't be enough.

  • @person661982 Puma Punku

  • @zkiller142

    What about it?

  • @person661982 It has a stone that has obvious machining work done to it.

  • A guy named Duncan built it.

  • So is this the accepted conclusion as to the method Ed Leedskalnin used to build Coral Castle?

  • Every fourth comment is someone asking how he put the slab across the top, and every fifth and sixth comments are someone explaining it.

  • So you put a small rock under the massive one. How did you lift the rock up enough to get the small one under there? How do you move these across, you know, huge grass rolling hills instead of flat concrete.

  • HOLLAND

  • Interesting stuff but these are not megaliths. Still nice technique. I want to know how the ancients hoisted real megaliths, multiple hundreds of ton stones high up into the air to put them into place. Pulley with thousands of man power behind them?

  • wow epic fail. The weights of the objects are so different....... now I would like him to move 200 tons, then he'll have proven his point to me. Then the thousands. This stuff was even disproven on the history channel.....

  • To compare this to what people have done in the past, is just stupid. "Rock of the pregnant woman" is 1200 TONS. The pyramids of giza were build in 22 years. In other words, they cut, transported, and placed 1 block every 9 seconds for 22 years. But this is apparently how they did it..........

  • @chris32393 9 seconds times at least 100,000 (if not more) men working is 900,000 seconds of work = 250 hrs, i think it's plausible this man or someone with the skill set they had back then could cut move and transport a block in 250 hrs or 10 men in 25 hrs.

  • there is another video of this and it is like one frame per twenty seconds

  • try it with the 130 ton stones stonehenge is dwarfed compared to many other sites.We can build stonehendge with a big crane not so with those massive stones.Point is the ancients were no dimmies and obviously they had better technology than us.

  • OMG ITS THE WORLDS STONGEST MAN!!

  • So that's how they stood them up, what about the stones on the top of the arches?

  • @KroovyRookas They could've used the technique this guy used to raise the stone 3 feet up, only they obviously did it for longer and much higher.

  • @KroovyRookas Really? I mean he's basically showing you the difficult part which is actually lifting these objects, after seeing the method it's just a matter of applying it in different ways.

    To put the stones on top you could simply keep lifting it higher (like he was doing before he tipped it over) raise it all the way up then stand the two other stones and sit the first one on top. So raise the stone first then the legs, just a guess but it's certainly possible

  • This guy reinvented the MAN'S version of legos

  • It's actually pretty interesting if you think about the ingenuity of it.

  • THUNDER!!!!

  • "his passion is moving heavy items". Someone needs a hobby.

  • @AngryDB that is his hobby. hes obviously a smart mother fucker.

  • @nutsack666 Oh, I'm not doubting his cleverness, it's just that moving heavy items can't be that fun.

  • @AngryDB its figuring out how to move them that is fun. to each their own.

  • minecraft in real life

  • There be all magnets up this bitch. No science.

  • @thnks11 They used anti-gravity magnetic technology supplied by extra-terrestrials. Don't believe me? Look up Ed Leedskalnin...

    He built the coral castle single-handedly with what the photographs prove is ET technology...

  • Thunder Sent me

  • no, kratos came and made em, it was a puzzle which the gods could not complete, so he went to youtube and searched how to fix the GOW puzzle and then.................

  • but what about the blocks that sit on top of the stones of stone henge?

  • @VaultTechGaming bigger see saw

  • wings

  • Wings sent me! THUNDERSTRUCK!

  • UR BOY WINGS SENT US DUDES!!

  • OKZ! BUT IF YOU USED THE LOGIC , THE QUESTION IS ..

    HOW YOU CAN CUTTING MANY TREE ?? TODAY YOU WASTE TIME AROUND 5 MIN. WHIT A CHAINSAW. AND IN THIS TIME JUST HAVE A PREHISTORIC KNIFE, I THINK CALL ESTAFETA AND ORDER 1000 TREE JAJA THAT DOESNT HAVE LOGIC.

  • Comment removed

  • Yeah, but the secret is how you get the weight on the pebble!

  • using magnetic fields you can do that shit. Someone told me today that you can move heavy stones and shit with sound too. Something to do with vibrating it making it bounce or some shit. nuts!

  • Walli's Henge

  • like, thanks for sharing

  • i believe the ancient egyptians were a bit more sophisticated and knew how to control electrons lift blocks that weighed tons.

  • so how did they bring the stones from wales to salsbry plaln then which is over 500 miles away quary them cut them and then erect them so they catch the summer solctice and the winter one each year with out fail over 2000 years before christ then

  • at 3:00 or earlier/later how does he get the giant stone on the jack?

  • Es una autentica chorrada,en el pasado ya nos daban 100.000 vueltas y sin tanto artilugio y no digamos sin saver para que servian que inculto

  • the guy's good... he knows his stuff...

    for those of u that still have questions ....the answer is leverage and imagination ...

    it will even move tinman842's wife off the couch ...

  • yea well lets see you move my wifes ass off the couch.... that would impress me.

  • Wow, This shows that the solution is to simplify things and they work better.

  • this was a triumph.

  • Interesting and smart but it doesn't explains the pyramids building:

    YouTube:

    Nassim Haramein - 2a Parte (4 de 25)

    Nassim Haramein - 2a Parte (5 de 25)

  • how will he put the blocks on top of each other?

  • @hackingtime88 now that is a question.......and i do want an answer lol

  • Nice job!!

  • this video is amazing

  • imprecionante

  • Really Genious, sometimes, we think too much in theoretical and stupid shit, when the main point is in actually try to do it, with brain, and practice, not just in front of a book.

    truly genious, a victory of science and logic, thank you for sharing.

  • david, you are goddamn retarded. he just showed that you don't need magic. not only that, but when merlin allegedly existed was thousands of years after stonehenge was built.

  • i believe stonhenge was raised with harmonics, its a secret that you dont hear about, but supposedly you can move objects with certain tones and such.

  • As At Work says,

    We know what is great

    We can build anything

  • Wonderful.

  • Who needs extraterrestrials when you have a human brain?

  • "How did he put the piece on top?"

    Easy, I guess... he first raised the orizontal piece (with the shown technique), then moved the vertical pillars under the horizontal piece (with the first technique - but trickyer and riskyer, because the base is much smaller, so there is less stability).

  • I published this video on the Dutch website WELSTIJL (24 january) kind regards Sem Mallée

  • Looks like a job for Mythbusters ! They should jump on this one. I know I'll be watching.

  • I get the concept, but what if you don't have a large, level concrete slab to spin the blocks on ?

    That's a luxury the ancients probably didn't have.

    Plus , he didn't explain how he placed the upper block. Maybe he did.." I *try* not to use pulleys or equipment". I'm not saying what he did is impossible, but there seems to a couple of holes in the story.

  • Very smart guy! But a couple of "I prepared this earlier...."s which were not fessed up like they should have.

  • Well imagine that the people who built stonehenge had a lot more manpower and raw resources to work with that it would have negated this guy's advantage over them. I would think that what he prepared earlier were the wodden structures like the "teeter-totter"

  • I appreciate what you're saying, and think the guy's a genius for coming up with it, but if the display of the teeter-totter device begins with the rock already on top of it and the rock is far smaller than the real ones I would like to know how it got there. Manpower is fine if it's proven on blocks the full size and weight but it's the all too often the standard answer when somthing gets too heavy to prove in full scale.

  • Ok, how did they move the stones that laid on top?

  • @skegsrus

    1. Position the block horizontally next to two standing (vertical) blocks.

    2. Raise the block in the horizontal position like he did with the fulcrum in the middle.

    3. Climb on top of the standing blocks and add something like boards that would act as a higher floor that hangs off the edge of the standing blocks.

    4. Move the horizontal block onto the "floor" above the vertical blocks.

    5. Use the technique for moving horizontal blocks.

    6. Remove wood.

  • How has no one figured this out before this guy?

  • Wants him to teach so I can have my construction crews use their mind and body to make the improbable possible.

  • Hmmm, there was a man who became famous by using massive stones to build things, while no one knew how he did it. I'll try to find more.

  • Failed - saw it on TV about 15 years ago. The main entrance and other gates were made of immense stones, balanced so that the right push would cause them to open easily. How he did all that was a mystery, kind of a recluse. California, Florida? ... ?

  • @cusanusnicolas

    look up "Coral Castle." That might be what you are talking about. Very interesting.

  • Hey, THANKS! That was it. I'm looking at the wiki story right now!

  • this is awesome.

    but did he explain how the blocks got on top? or did I miss that part?

  • This is seriously cool. Never would've thought of this, and yet, now that I've witnessed it here, it seems so obvious.

  • yeah, ok I get it - but HOW did they get the ones on the top to lay horizontally?! This still doesn't answer that.

  • @schaumby

    3:03 He moves the block upwards. Now with that he is able to slide two more blocks underneath to hold up the horizontal block. He didn't have to explain it. ;)

  • Good stuff.

  • i bet he couldn't move my penis

  • Comment removed

  • He deals with large objects... not the microscopic.

  • stone HENGE

  • Yes. This is the stuff that matters. This guy is awesome.

  • Very ingenious. But we have no way of knowing if this was the method they actually used to build Stonehenge. And we never will.

  • true, but if this guy was able to figure this out, I'm sure someone then could have as well.

  • @quadturbo4

    We don't know if this was the exact method, but we can say with confidence that it was some variation of this

  • wally world?

  • Wally Wallington is a genius!

  • Only problem is that stonehenge isnt made of perfectly flat and square stones

  • but back then...they would be more intact to their original shape.

  • they dont have to be for this method to work...

    its just takes a little more care

  • the principle would still work. You've also had a few thousand years of errosion on Stonehenge as well so I doubt they were as rough as they are now.

  • @PrawdehFish neither would these if you let them sit since 1600 BC i bet they were at one time

  • @PrawdehFish

    this technique can be adapted to various shapes... and the stones back then were much more even than they are now

  • Why is Van Morrison so mad at these rocks?

  • I think I saw this on Daily Planet...?

  • These 'crazy' folk are the ones who make the world go around.

  • Great video but 5:53 is the face of evil!

  • wait.... wally wallington?  ...really?

  • Comment removed

  • This wouldnt be surprising. The romans knew how to make concrete too. While this may be the case in some less well-known pyramids, I dont think its likely in the famous ones. Most of the exposed rock looks like rock (not concrete) and show evidence of being hewn. Hell, the rock even matches that of nearby quarries.

  • Comment removed

  • how do you get the blocks on top?

    IT IS A MYSTERY.

  • @yexey nah man they explain that too

  • call it Wally's Circle Jerk

  • "Oh yeah? Well my grandpa can move a 10 ton block of concrete with his bare hands!"

    Lol.

  • If you think this is cool, check out Coral Castle. Edward Leedskalnin built it by himself, usually working alone at night. The grounds of Coral Castle consist of 1,100 short tons (1,000 t) of stones found in the forms of walls, carvings, furniture and a castle tower. A single (very small) man assembled the entire site using only primitive tools. With few exceptions, the objects are made from single pieces of stone that weigh on average 15 short tons (14 t) each. The largest stone 27 tons.

  • where do you get a 19,000 block?

  • I think he makes them out of concrete.

  • he poured his own concrete on site is my guess.

  • so moving

    pun intended

  • lol what a badass