Ferguson's main idea is that Keynesian is not the solution in this case, and with a 1.8T deficit and 15T in debt where we are, it's hard to argue that this can continue. If you want to follow Krugman down this path goodluck and learn mandarin
Ah, it's nice to see Krugman so glib while Keynesian economics drives the world's governments into massive deficits, and then continues to prescribe yet more spending to get the governments out of the mess...
Dude, fuck off. It's you Republican chimps that sank the economy. Cut taxes on the super rich, deregulate Wall Street and turn it into the Wild West, and wage two unnecessary, multi-trillion dollar wars--yea that worked fucking great, didn't it?
YOUR ideas FAILED. You need to learn some humility.
Krugman should be thankful there is people like Niall Ferguson around from keeping history from repeating itself but it's totally up to government and decision makers to listen or not while he can just stand on the side bench and tell everyone, "I told you so."
Focus on your mathematics and numbers while ignoring people, trends, and above all HISTORY and at the end of the day Niall Ferguson will simply say, "I told ya so..." Yeah, I guess the Senior Research Fellow of Oxford University does not know a single thing huh? Oh wait...
Please note that my book Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Shaped Modern Economics is published by W.W.Norton in October.
Professor John B.Taylor says that: “Nicholas Wapshott brings the Keynes-Hayek fight of the 20th century back to life, making the clash both entertaining and highly relevant for understanding economic crises of the 21st century.”
Read an extract at: sites.google.com/site/wapshottkeyneshayek/
yeah if all economists agreed with each other, we wouldn't need to have debates would we? I'm not at all surprised that the conservative Nial Ferguson is attacking the liberal Paul Krugman, economists of different persuasions have been at each others throats since time began.
Why are there more idiots on this page than economists and students? Where are the Krugman supporters? Why don't you fools and children go watch your Niall Ferguson lectures instead?
@dadoody Wow lol, That is just amazing to me sense ferguson knows less then economist did in 1920. I guess his snide nature and his simplistic thinking is easy for you people to understand.
@tigerone1970 Macro 101 is pretty simple mathematics. Pretty simple arithmetic actually. And Ferguson doesn't understand it, or declines to use it, preferring instead some kind of nonsense.
@kinggagkk Nonsense... like financial history? Models have been proven miserably wrong in the past such as Paul Samuelson's adaptation of the phillips curve and Eugene Fama's EMH. According to Robert Barro, Krugman isn't even using the correct multipliers.
Ferguson's main idea is that Keynesian is not the solution in this case, and with a 1.8T deficit and 15T in debt where we are, it's hard to argue that this can continue. If you want to follow Krugman down this path goodluck and learn mandarin
15Arigold 4 weeks ago
Ah, it's nice to see Krugman so glib while Keynesian economics drives the world's governments into massive deficits, and then continues to prescribe yet more spending to get the governments out of the mess...
JoeBrenn 3 months ago
@JoeBrenn
Dude, fuck off. It's you Republican chimps that sank the economy. Cut taxes on the super rich, deregulate Wall Street and turn it into the Wild West, and wage two unnecessary, multi-trillion dollar wars--yea that worked fucking great, didn't it?
YOUR ideas FAILED. You need to learn some humility.
profd65 3 days ago
Krugman should be thankful there is people like Niall Ferguson around from keeping history from repeating itself but it's totally up to government and decision makers to listen or not while he can just stand on the side bench and tell everyone, "I told you so."
natashaardiani 5 months ago
@natashaardiani Ferguson's a hack, plain and simple.
82goggles 2 months ago 3
And where is Krugman now?....
bcfsl 6 months ago
@bcfsl Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton.
wworldp 5 months ago 7
Focus on your mathematics and numbers while ignoring people, trends, and above all HISTORY and at the end of the day Niall Ferguson will simply say, "I told ya so..." Yeah, I guess the Senior Research Fellow of Oxford University does not know a single thing huh? Oh wait...
willsmc10 6 months ago
Krugman, you should have said "he does not understand KEYNESIAN economics 101".
fxnooodle 7 months ago
Please note that my book Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Shaped Modern Economics is published by W.W.Norton in October.
Professor John B.Taylor says that: “Nicholas Wapshott brings the Keynes-Hayek fight of the 20th century back to life, making the clash both entertaining and highly relevant for understanding economic crises of the 21st century.”
Read an extract at: sites.google.com/site/wapshottkeyneshayek/
Nicholas Wapshott
nhwapshott 8 months ago
yeah if all economists agreed with each other, we wouldn't need to have debates would we? I'm not at all surprised that the conservative Nial Ferguson is attacking the liberal Paul Krugman, economists of different persuasions have been at each others throats since time began.
phantomsuccour 8 months ago
That was just silly .
But he is a silly man.
Boazhorribilis 11 months ago
Why are there more idiots on this page than economists and students? Where are the Krugman supporters? Why don't you fools and children go watch your Niall Ferguson lectures instead?
truthslap 1 year ago
This guy in an expert in every field, just ask him, why won't you listen
lacolinatx 1 year ago 4
Ferguson's much more insightful.
dadoody 1 year ago 12
@dadoody Wow lol, That is just amazing to me sense ferguson knows less then economist did in 1920. I guess his snide nature and his simplistic thinking is easy for you people to understand.
thesparitan 8 months ago
Krugman is the best...
sadhaklal 1 year ago
Comment removed
stopstickers 11 months ago
@sadhaklal ...at proposing unsustainable keynesian economics.
stopstickers 11 months ago
As long as you preach to the choir you're a genius! And this choir lives somewhere on the moon.
bush1tman 1 year ago 3
Economics, in practice, has little to do with mathematics, and mostly to do with psychology. Nonsense?
uspatriotgear 1 year ago 2
It is truly an indictment of economics, when you can say about a professor, "He doesn't understand macro economics 101" - and be right.
Economists seem to be continuously misinterpreting complex systems and complex interactions. Preferrably using very simple mathematics.
tigerone1970 1 year ago
@tigerone1970 Macro 101 is pretty simple mathematics. Pretty simple arithmetic actually. And Ferguson doesn't understand it, or declines to use it, preferring instead some kind of nonsense.
kinggagkk 1 year ago
@kinggagkk Nonsense... like financial history? Models have been proven miserably wrong in the past such as Paul Samuelson's adaptation of the phillips curve and Eugene Fama's EMH. According to Robert Barro, Krugman isn't even using the correct multipliers.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
I laugh at Krugman all the time.
tubub 1 year ago 21