Suppressing Science in the Obama Administration

[JFKCoupdetat]

I think Obama's going to use the effects that this oil spill will have on the enviorment to further his control over Americans. He said that the spill will have little effect on wildlife and eco-systems. We as a people need to wake up and realize that Global Warming is a fraud and that it was created by the United Nations to create a One World Government! I'm posting this because I fear for your sovereignty! What do I get? Pooed on and silenced!

[DarkHero187]

obama is being controlled by the bankers of the us this is not about freedom anymore its about money

[JoeAverage86]

There is NO man made global warming! Yes, the earth gets warm and the earth gets cold. This process has been going on for 5 billion years. to think that mankind can destroy the world in the blink of an eye is insane.

Stop Science Facism; Stop Obama. Boycott Copenhagen.

[BUCKWHEATOBAMA]

@JoeAverage86 "Climate Change" is all about CONTROL.

oh look! the climate is changing!

they cant call it global warming anymore, because they know that the erath is in a cooling period as we speak.

[vedicastrol]

always look for the money traill. Gore-baby stands to make billions. he's on the take from the British consort who wants to reduce the global population. Cap and trade will make the USA even more dependent.

[SANDEDFACELESS69]

idiots. just idiots. lets say we're wrong, we lose money.

Let's say you're wrong, you want to talk about how much damage will take place all over the world? Talk about expensive. If you lived by LA and saw the smog you wouldn't think the same way. There's so much smog that when it rains, it burns your skin and poisons the seas for days. We need to cut down on emissions and pollution. It's really sad the right is making this a political thing.

[hnolette]

Be sure to stay on prompter Mr. O-bummer

[PaulUmbarger]

Does anyone still take this muppet seriously?

[JoeAverage86]

NOt me. Obama is a liar.

[INTENTIONPEACE]

WHAT A JOKER AND A LIAR

[bobhardball]

No offense, but the EPA veteran Al Carlin, who wrote the report you are taling about in your video, is an economist, not a climate scientist. And Al Carlin himself admitted that no one at the agency solicited the report he wrote and considers "global warming as a hobby on my own time". I am all for criticizing the liberals and especially Hussein Obama, but our critics have to be based on rock-solid facts!!!

[ctpolitics2008]

This administration and the media in general are suppressing information that is contrary to extreme leftist views on issues like Global Warming, Healthcare and Immigration. These are the most important issues of our time. Conservatives need to unite and focus on them. Moderates are our allies in these are areas. Have you heard that Global Warming is causing Global cooling! What a farce.

[ctpolitics2008]

Global Warming studies are based on bad science sponsored by OPEC, Russia, China, India and GE. These groups are the financial beneficiaries of it. U.S. energy use is more clean and efficient. Our jobs and energy will go to China and India. Have you ever been to China? You cant breath the air and everyone has to ware a mask. Cap and Trade will further depress our economy and strengthen our enemies. The answer is simple; drill here, drill now, put a $50 fed tax to invest in alternatives.

[michael01x]

The report was an unsolicited series of comments compiled by an economist within the EPA whose boss allowed him to work on it outside of his area of expertise and responsibility on agency time. This economist has generated multiple iterations of the report over the last two years and has been given multiple opportunities to host seminars with audiences inside and outside of the agency. The content of the report itself was, in many regards, a copy-and-paste job from contrarian blog postings.

[therealrevo]

And yet the EPA felt the need to sweep it under the rug.

[Torbellicus]

That's called peer review. You don't publish carbage.

[greyflcn]

Keep in mind that Carlin's sources were NOT peer reviewed

They were books and blog posts.

greyfalcon. net/ carlin

Effectively making them no more scientifically credible than a tabloid.

So frankly, avoiding the promotion of fake psuedoscience is rather inline with avoiding "twisting and obscuring" of REAL science.

[CredoVeritas]

What about NASA reports that state that we have been cooling for 11 years. How terribly inconvenient!

The Ulysses probe is being deliberately shut down (even though it is still transmitting) after finding also that the Sun has reached a 50 year output LOW. Yes, the glowing thing in the sky IS a factor!

There's the fact that Congress didn't even read and comprehend the Bill. They didn't read it!

How do Congressmen vote Yes to a Bill they haven't read?

[greyflcn]

re: CredoVeritas ==that we have been? cooling for 11 years.== You make it sound like stringing together two ENSO events in 1998 and 2008 represents a "trend". greyfalcon. net/ 1998 greyfalcon. net/ 2008 greyfalcon. net/ rsstemps2.png greyfalcon. net/ cherrypicking Especially since ENSO events only last a few months. greyfalcon. net/ enso.png As for the sun. Natural factors alone don't explain what's going on. greyfalcon. net/ solar0.png greyfalcon. net/ forcing4.png

[CredoVeritas]

Cherry pick this.

Congress just passed a Bill they did not read.

Give me control of Congress, the good intentions of the populace, and a virtually endless source of funds, and anyone could steer the general public.

No matter.

Congress just passed a bill they did not read. Why?

They did it for greed

They did it for favors

They did it for self-promotion

and they did it for fear.

NO argument you have will convince the people that they did it because they understood the Bill or the science.

[greyflcn]

re: CredoVeritas

So what sort of policy approach would you have preferred?

[CredoVeritas]

One that employs logic; A bill that can be fully read and understood is a good start;

Congressmen that don't bend their views and votes or holdout for handouts-- that would be even better;

An approach that avoids all methods of debt spending at the expense, labor, and despair of the American People...that would be outstanding.

Overall, a policy that holds truth to be self-evident and acknowledges that Liberty discriminates against none and frees all.

[1776Reborn]

hah, figures.

[vedicastrol]

I agree that global warming is "junk science", but how can someone like Sec of energy Stephen Yu support it?

[greyflcn]

re: vedicastrol ==how can someone like Sec of energy Stephen Yu support it ? == Might have something to do with the overwhelming scientific evidence. greyfalcon. net/ candle greyfalcon. net/ climate Not to mention the agreement of every major national academy of sciences. greyfalcon. net/ whatwouldittake And not a single scientific institution in the world in disagreement. greyfalcon. net/ nameone Last I checked, there's only 1 reality. greyfalcon. net/ reality.png

[vedicastrol]

you are absolutely dead wrong. 30,000 scientists are suing Al Gore for fraud. he refuses to debate the issue. the fact is that we are in a cycle moving into a new Ice Age. Have youm noticed that it was snowing in June in North Dakota? the Polar bear population went fro 5,000 in the 50's to about 25,000.

[greyflcn]

re: cedicastrol

30,000 scientists you say?

Really.

Let's say I don't believe you.

Could you perhaps show me their credentials?

No you can't. Since it's nothing more than a laundry list of names.

With a review process so pathetic that at many times included TV stars, Disney characters, Congress members, and even the spice girls.

greyfalcon. net/ oism

greyfalcon. net/ oism2

[Serafinos]

Our credentials are based on the true fact that Al LYING Gore is our cousin in REAL LIFE!

He is MILKING idiots for $millions$ and laughing all the way to the bank.

HE IS A FRAUD!!!

Wake up PEOPLE!!!

[ScarlettKnights]

excellent

[lilyan24]

CO2 testing will soon no longer be needed for residential transportation and catalytic converters will too be obsolete. How else can the EPA move forward and recoup this tax revenue ?