yes sure, everybody has the right to, but... it's not right to host a person with an elementary school certificate as an expert in politics in some T.V show! >>> just an example to make you understand.
I believe Dawkins is a very good biologist, but not a very good philosopher. Therefor, he has the right to talk about his opinion in evolution and support it with evidence, but it's not a good thing if he criticizes religions in a philosophical point of view.
So only philosophers can use philosophy to support their points of views? this is unacceptable!
The idea behind this show is to host people who subscribe to disbelief and show their arguments. Noone said that their arguments have to stick to their own area of expertise. See Arther Miller for instance, Does he have to find arguments for his atheism that are only supported by Theater science [since he is a play writer]? Same with Weinberg/Physics and Dennett/Philosophy of consciousness.
despite the fact whether what you said is correct or not, and to be honest with you- I didn't read the whole reply. My point of view was: Richard Dawkins should stop trying to publish or spread his philosophy because his philosophical points and argument don't amount to be that widely published, that's because they are not well built over the right logic.
in other more simple words: I DON'T LIKE his philosophical points of view because they are not logical enough TO ME.
and liking or disliking is a relative issue, it differs from a person to another.
in conclusion: If you like his philosophy- it's up to you. And I don't like his philosophy, that's why I see that he should care about bare Biology, because he is better in it.
And I don't want to discuss any point further with you.
الدين مايزال ضرورة لدول العالم الأول. فلا احد يستطيع السيطرة عليهم بدونه
3thabbo 3 days ago
I really want to understand the reason why he tries to show himself as a philosopher and a preacher for Atheism.
It's going to be much better if he sticks to Biology, nothing else Biology.
94AJ94 1 year ago
@94AJ94
I believe everyone is entitled to express his own opinions on any subject. If I or you do not like those opinions, then its our own problem....
Besides, the guy has revolutionized his field of expertise, no body could blame him when he does anything afterwards.
fluxqubit 1 year ago
@flux qubit
yes sure, everybody has the right to, but... it's not right to host a person with an elementary school certificate as an expert in politics in some T.V show! >>> just an example to make you understand.
I believe Dawkins is a very good biologist, but not a very good philosopher. Therefor, he has the right to talk about his opinion in evolution and support it with evidence, but it's not a good thing if he criticizes religions in a philosophical point of view.
94AJ94 1 year ago
@94AJ94
So only philosophers can use philosophy to support their points of views? this is unacceptable!
The idea behind this show is to host people who subscribe to disbelief and show their arguments. Noone said that their arguments have to stick to their own area of expertise. See Arther Miller for instance, Does he have to find arguments for his atheism that are only supported by Theater science [since he is a play writer]? Same with Weinberg/Physics and Dennett/Philosophy of consciousness.
fluxqubit 1 year ago
@fluxqubit
despite the fact whether what you said is correct or not, and to be honest with you- I didn't read the whole reply. My point of view was: Richard Dawkins should stop trying to publish or spread his philosophy because his philosophical points and argument don't amount to be that widely published, that's because they are not well built over the right logic.
in other more simple words: I DON'T LIKE his philosophical points of view because they are not logical enough TO ME.
94AJ94 1 year ago
@fluxqubit
and liking or disliking is a relative issue, it differs from a person to another.
in conclusion: If you like his philosophy- it's up to you. And I don't like his philosophy, that's why I see that he should care about bare Biology, because he is better in it.
And I don't want to discuss any point further with you.
94AJ94 1 year ago
أشكرك على الحلقات الرائعه
العالم بدون أديان سيبدوا مكان مسالما جدا
Em2009mA 1 year ago
@Em2009mA
نحن في عالم بلا أديان
و يبدو ان احدهم على خطأ
الله يهديكم
HoussineRafia 2 months ago
flux thanks very much
MultiMindStorm 1 year ago
شكررررررررررررررررررررررررررررا
20fadi 1 year ago
الحمد لله على نعمة الإسلام وكفى بها من نعمة
shadishare 1 year ago
شكرا على ترجمة اللقاء الممتع والمفيد مع العالم داوكنز
altelljordan 2 years ago
معجب بعقلية ريتشارد داوكنيز
7aMoODaiZER 2 years ago
flux...
ur works r great...
if we have more of u... soon prosperity and science will flourish in our land...
i salute u...
atheer2002 2 years ago
thanks man! just doing the least I can....
fluxqubit 2 years ago
مشكور على الترجمه انا لغتي كويسه بس ماشاء الله ابداع يعني ما لقيت اي غلط اقدر اقول انه غلط وتراني استمتعت بالفيدو بشكل غير طبيعي يعطيك العافيه
sarr47 3 years ago
عمل رائع ...وجهد مشكور...
بالرغم من الخلاف مع بعض الاراء...
إلا أني أرى ترجمتك لهذه الحلقات من أوائل الأعمال العقلانية الجيدة عن الالحاد واللادينية على اليويتيوب..
شكرا لك..
abuelfeda14 3 years ago
Thx and well done, an English transcript comes handy to most non native :-)))
Virtelia 3 years ago