I love the fact that Mark can be one of the most impartial critics in the world - he liked Twilight for example because it filled it's niche - but all his rationality and logical approach to a film goes out the window when confronted by the horror... of Julian Sands.
I love the fact that Mark can be one of the most impartial critics in the world - he liked Twilight for example because it filled it's niche - but all his rationality and logical approach to a film goes out the window when confronted by the horror... of Julian Sands.
trying to find a review of 'Sweet November' really awful film but Jason Isaacs is in it and he plays a transvestite - I'd just like to know what Mark thinks of it seeing as his favourtie person is in it.
mark fails to mention how much bloody fun the actors are having in the film. though it is basically a shot for shot remake of ocean's 11, it is nonetheless a fun time. it's utterly inconsequential and pointless, but it is a celebration of celebrity and glamor and the entire (excellent) cast is well aware of this. you have to look at soderbergh's career to accurately appraise the film. it's 2 hours of unbridled fun and nothing else, and he pulls it off remarkably.
I think the 3rd was worst than the second. I didn't like the second but at least Vincent Cassell was good in it. At least we had the funny bit about Julia impersonating...Julia. The third was 100% annoyance. Not funny, not charming, everybody was bad in it. And the colors of Las Vegas were nauseating.
The bit where JR is impersonating JR is the WORST thing in the film. That's the part which illustrates just how smug and pretentious Ocean's12 had become.
why does he hate so much sands? anyway critics are lame. everybody is a critic. everybody should have his or her own opinion, and stop following some smartass who cant do art.
The idea that critics are just failed artists is rubbish. Some are but Kermode is somebody who knows film inside and out. Unlike many critics, he also serves as a historian, providing contemporary films with the context they require to judge them correctly. I don't always agree with him but I'm glad he is around promoting good standards for cinema.
Sure everyone is allowed their opinion but not everyone has the knowledge to back up their claims and see how it compares to similar films. Some, the broadsheet variety and those who write for up-market American mags, are pompous arseholes.
Plus Kermode is a big fan of genre cinema so he's one of the only critics who likes cheap, nasty B-movies and exploitation horrors.
As for the Julian Sands thing, I'm not sure. It's probably the same way I feel about Shia LaBeouf.
"He was eaten by a spider".
MosesSupposes1 2 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I love the fact that Mark can be one of the most impartial critics in the world - he liked Twilight for example because it filled it's niche - but all his rationality and logical approach to a film goes out the window when confronted by the horror... of Julian Sands.
Bagrah10 4 months ago
I love the fact that Mark can be one of the most impartial critics in the world - he liked Twilight for example because it filled it's niche - but all his rationality and logical approach to a film goes out the window when confronted by the horror... of Julian Sands.
Bagrah10 4 months ago
Best review of Mr Bean's Holiday ever.
sketchyjoe 9 months ago 2
IT'S JULIAN SANDS!!!
Zeloim23 9 months ago 3
trying to find a review of 'Sweet November' really awful film but Jason Isaacs is in it and he plays a transvestite - I'd just like to know what Mark thinks of it seeing as his favourtie person is in it.
fayezfaye 11 months ago
Comment removed
fayezfaye 11 months ago
Why does Kermode take the micky outta julian sands, he aint that bad an actor
connaught2008 1 year ago
Oceans 12 is worse IMO
ehmazin 1 year ago
mark fails to mention how much bloody fun the actors are having in the film. though it is basically a shot for shot remake of ocean's 11, it is nonetheless a fun time. it's utterly inconsequential and pointless, but it is a celebration of celebrity and glamor and the entire (excellent) cast is well aware of this. you have to look at soderbergh's career to accurately appraise the film. it's 2 hours of unbridled fun and nothing else, and he pulls it off remarkably.
acrophobe 1 year ago
i never saw anything in any of the Oceans pictures
navylaks2 1 year ago
Bridge to Terabithia is a great film.
EvilgidgitReturns 1 year ago 12
B1ggu5. Spot on.
bruised247 1 year ago
I think the 3rd was worst than the second. I didn't like the second but at least Vincent Cassell was good in it. At least we had the funny bit about Julia impersonating...Julia. The third was 100% annoyance. Not funny, not charming, everybody was bad in it. And the colors of Las Vegas were nauseating.
skinwalkerxxx 2 years ago
The bit where JR is impersonating JR is the WORST thing in the film. That's the part which illustrates just how smug and pretentious Ocean's12 had become.
B1ggu5 2 years ago 4
smug maybe. but I think it took comedic balls to do it.
skinwalkerxxx 2 years ago
"IT'S JULIAN SANDS!!!"
B1ggu5 2 years ago 5
"So here I am in Las Vegas with Julian Sands"
"Bless him"
ELCNUmorFnaMehT 2 years ago 5
gooderist!
billybobtp 2 years ago 2
The Julian Sands bit is brilliant. I would have paid to have seen Mark's face when he suddenly appeared on the screen.
doosher 3 years ago 14
why does he hate so much sands? anyway critics are lame. everybody is a critic. everybody should have his or her own opinion, and stop following some smartass who cant do art.
LocoEvilDabdoub 2 years ago
The idea that critics are just failed artists is rubbish. Some are but Kermode is somebody who knows film inside and out. Unlike many critics, he also serves as a historian, providing contemporary films with the context they require to judge them correctly. I don't always agree with him but I'm glad he is around promoting good standards for cinema.
TulseLuper 2 years ago 68
Sure everyone is allowed their opinion but not everyone has the knowledge to back up their claims and see how it compares to similar films. Some, the broadsheet variety and those who write for up-market American mags, are pompous arseholes.
Plus Kermode is a big fan of genre cinema so he's one of the only critics who likes cheap, nasty B-movies and exploitation horrors.
As for the Julian Sands thing, I'm not sure. It's probably the same way I feel about Shia LaBeouf.
doosher 2 years ago 4
I think you replied to the wrong person as I agree with everything you've said.
TulseLuper 2 years ago
JULIAN SANDS HAS GOT WORK AGAIN!!!
crazyrabbits 3 years ago 38
I found it far superior to the first sequel - not as offensive as most other trash released these days.
BakedWalnut 3 years ago
hes hilarious
j3parrots 3 years ago 2
Kermode = man.
harvesterofeyes 3 years ago 5
I agree with the review, but i preferred potc 3 to oceans 13.
Halfdannn 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What's wrong with Julian Sands
bossman103 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Honestly Julian Sands is awesome in Warlock, watch it before saying he is rubbish
bossman103 3 years ago
this is not a movie, this is a guest list
bloglops 4 years ago 6
Julian Sands...ah him, I saw him in a repeat of Arachnophobia the other day. Oh and that god-awful low-budget sc-fi movie, The Tomorrow Man lol
sulijoo 4 years ago 3
The Julian Sands bit is LOL funny!
Ulleskelf 4 years ago 4
One of the funniest reviews ive ever seen!
whiskeyonesix 4 years ago 7
Kermode is a genious.
hastingboy 4 years ago 6
julian sands!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bluegrit 4 years ago 8