And history has not vindicated that way of thinking. The politics of fear were always around, but the politics of fear the "big government" began in 1964. Landslide, crushing loss. Though I must admit, he was the real deal, not a phony who put on postures to get votes. At least in that he can be admired.
That old Fuck Headed Swiss of Wastap bag o' crap! He sure sponged off the Government most of his life! He, like many of these lifetime politicians, bite the hand that feeds them>>so hypocritical on so many levels. Everyone's for SMALL GOVERNMENT FOR THOSE OTHER PEOPLE!
Barry Goldwater was a true Conservative Republican who was anti Big Government. He didn't like socialist Big Government or authoritarian Big Government with limited Social Freedom. He believed people should be able to live their own lives, as long as they weren't hurting innocent people with their freedom.
What I respect about Barry Goldwater as a liberal was that he was the real thing. He was against all forms of Big Government not just the socialist version. Unlike Theocratic Conservatives and Neo Conservatives.
Barry Goldwater was in reality of Polish-Jewish ancestry and the son of immigrants. Some say the reason for his failure to win the 64 election was because of his JEwish origins.
Goldwater was on the right track, but the truth is far more grim. The vast majority of inflation is through our banking system. So, when you think the gov't is taking half your wages, no...just half of what the bankers didn't take already. During Reagan's presidency, the dollar was devalued by 90%. Question: did your wages increase by 1000% to offset that? I doubt it. Libertarians can't be bought out, and we are all addicted to money. Fiscal conservatism is extinct.
It's true. Taxes destroy the creation of wealth and deincentivize success creating a socialist economy with lazy unionized workers who smoke on their lunchbreak on video.
In my heart, I knew he was right, it's a shame we don't have more Conservatives like him these days. Those who dare speak the Libertarian words of Goldwater are laughed at and ridiculed for being "Racist" or "Hating the Poor".
Barry Goldwater is the man! Milton Friedman, Thomas Sewell, Peter Schiff, Ronald Reagan. These are some of the greatest men this country has ever produced
@SuperGuitarman69 I'd make a few modifications to that list. Replace Milton Friedman (phony libertarian) with Murray Rothbard (actual libertarian). Replace Ronald Reagan (big gov't advocate) with Ron Paul (limited gov't advocate). Replace Thomas Sowell with Walter Block. Finally, replace Barry Goldwater (warmonger) with Howard Buffett.
@1938dmkdz is that what you call someone who votes against the civil rights and voting rights acts: classy? because thats what he did. and when he ran for president in 1964 he won only 5 states outside of his homestate of arizona. can you guess which ones? georgia, alabama, south carolina, mississippi, and louisiana - segregationist states.
We need another Goldwater to keep our minds on REAL issues rather than the typical : Gay Marriage, Abortion, and so on that are used to piss off people so they lose focus on things that matter.
What's the difference between, "choose to be ruled" verses "elect to be governed?" In the definition of "elect" is "choose;" one definition of 'governed" is "controlled." How about, "Chose to be controlled?"
I think the primary distinction is between RULED and GOVERNED. Ruled implies a controlling authority operating under a dynamic "law." Governed implies an authority bound by a static law.
There's a strong difference between "ruled" and governed". What he means by "ruled" is that the governmet takes away our choice and implements thier will instead of ours, whereas "governed" would mean to be organized and structured, yet given our freedom to live and choose how we may. He makes complete sense to me. That's the real conservative way - to have the people live in freedom while the government HELPS the people, not rules them. To have a government FOR the people.
Being governed is different than being controlled. Choosing to be controlled makes no reference to the act of electing delegates to represent your individual interests. That's the difference between Goldwater and so many neo-conservatives. Goldwater believed in the power of the individual, while neo-cons support government oversight, just as much as they claim the democrats do. That is also why many consider Goldwater's views to be libertarian, rather than latter-day republican.
It's amazing how current this is even if it was 45 years ago. Goldwater was yet another great man that was vilified by the liberal media.
If he had been president during Vietnam, imagine how much better things would have gone.
He might have scared the Viet Cong into submission without a single shot. (Yeah, I know probably not, but I think that things would have gone better for us anyhow).
A lot of liberals point to Goldwater's pro-choice views to argue that he somehow "turned liberal" at the end of his life.
But I disagree. Although Goldwater may have been personally pro-choice, I don't think he would have supported Roe v. Wade on the grounds that it was a federal intrusion on states rights.
Regardless of his personal opinions, Goldwater was, above all, constitutionalist.
No way! Goldwater's greatest virtue was that the Federal Government had no rule in determining how individuals should live their life. I do not want the do-gooders telling me how to live my life. Haven't they done enough to erode our precious few freedoms?
And history has not vindicated that way of thinking. The politics of fear were always around, but the politics of fear the "big government" began in 1964. Landslide, crushing loss. Though I must admit, he was the real deal, not a phony who put on postures to get votes. At least in that he can be admired.
bwillis1975 5 months ago
That old Fuck Headed Swiss of Wastap bag o' crap! He sure sponged off the Government most of his life! He, like many of these lifetime politicians, bite the hand that feeds them>>so hypocritical on so many levels. Everyone's for SMALL GOVERNMENT FOR THOSE OTHER PEOPLE!
univibe23 6 months ago
@univibe23 What other people? Taxation is progressive and he fell in the upper bracket, so I am pretty sure he paid for those OTHER PEOPLE.
H1TMANactual 2 months ago
Barry Goldwater was a true Conservative Republican who was anti Big Government. He didn't like socialist Big Government or authoritarian Big Government with limited Social Freedom. He believed people should be able to live their own lives, as long as they weren't hurting innocent people with their freedom.
FRSFreeStatePlus 6 months ago
What I respect about Barry Goldwater as a liberal was that he was the real thing. He was against all forms of Big Government not just the socialist version. Unlike Theocratic Conservatives and Neo Conservatives.
FRSFreeState 8 months ago
Government has his hand in some kids pocket? Isn't that illegal?
HVACSoldier 10 months ago 3
@HVACSoldier Not if you work for the TSA!
RMMHS4RP 7 months ago
@orgasmicide2 Thanks for the info. But how did it get this systerm get the name Bretton Woods?
67nairb 10 months ago
@orgasmicide2 Pardon my ignorance but what is the Bretton Woods system.
67nairb 10 months ago
Did the Vietnam War help cause inflation?
67nairb 10 months ago
@orgasmicide2 Carter was a very weak-willed president; well meaning but weak willed. Thank God for Ronald Reagan.
67nairb 10 months ago
Goldwater proposed his sollution to end the Vietnam War, "either win it or get out." We should've chose the latter.
67nairb 11 months ago
Barry Goldwater was in reality of Polish-Jewish ancestry and the son of immigrants. Some say the reason for his failure to win the 64 election was because of his JEwish origins.
67nairb 11 months ago
No, the people voted for Lyndon Johnson, one of the most despicable, tragic and catastrophic figures in American history.
billyguns2 1 year ago
Goldwater was on the right track, but the truth is far more grim. The vast majority of inflation is through our banking system. So, when you think the gov't is taking half your wages, no...just half of what the bankers didn't take already. During Reagan's presidency, the dollar was devalued by 90%. Question: did your wages increase by 1000% to offset that? I doubt it. Libertarians can't be bought out, and we are all addicted to money. Fiscal conservatism is extinct.
jasondmcneill 1 year ago
@jasondmcneill Jimmy Carter tried to stop inflation in the late 1970s or at least curb it but couldn't.
67nairb 11 months ago
BULLSHIT......
less01 1 year ago
It's true. Taxes destroy the creation of wealth and deincentivize success creating a socialist economy with lazy unionized workers who smoke on their lunchbreak on video.
ToxicOdiousOne 1 year ago
In my heart, I knew he was right, it's a shame we don't have more Conservatives like him these days. Those who dare speak the Libertarian words of Goldwater are laughed at and ridiculed for being "Racist" or "Hating the Poor".
Natendowii 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul for president
xMaXiMuSx 1 year ago
The 1960s spending eventually destroyed the monetary system and started the financial casino era.
xaviqaz 1 year ago
We want Barry! Not Barry Obama, tho.
whoo689 1 year ago
Barry Goldwater is the man! Milton Friedman, Thomas Sewell, Peter Schiff, Ronald Reagan. These are some of the greatest men this country has ever produced
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
@SuperGuitarman69 I'd make a few modifications to that list. Replace Milton Friedman (phony libertarian) with Murray Rothbard (actual libertarian). Replace Ronald Reagan (big gov't advocate) with Ron Paul (limited gov't advocate). Replace Thomas Sowell with Walter Block. Finally, replace Barry Goldwater (warmonger) with Howard Buffett.
OldRightPaleocon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OldRightPaleocon Every one you named? ALL great men!
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
join me in helping restore the individual freedoms we once had to fuck over the little guy.
jbond5150 1 year ago
@jbond5150 Sorry to burst your bubble, but the little guy is still an individual.
manmanguy 1 year ago
1938dmkdz
Although I am more of a liberal I can
see this man in 2010 working in the senate, this man had class....
1938dmkdz 1 year ago 2
@1938dmkdz is that what you call someone who votes against the civil rights and voting rights acts: classy? because thats what he did. and when he ran for president in 1964 he won only 5 states outside of his homestate of arizona. can you guess which ones? georgia, alabama, south carolina, mississippi, and louisiana - segregationist states.
jbond5150 1 year ago
@jbond5150 FDR interned thousands of japanese American citizens. im sure you like FDR.
MCJ62 1 year ago
A wonderful man. I wish he were alive and well today so we could elect him.
JDODSON7 2 years ago
Wow, nice. No smear campaigns, no "join or we'll all be killed"--just pure policy.
jesuslover037 2 years ago
@jesuslover037 That trick never works. If you want to get elected you have to paint your opponent as the Devil incarnate.
HVACSoldier 1 year ago
We need another Goldwater to keep our minds on REAL issues rather than the typical : Gay Marriage, Abortion, and so on that are used to piss off people so they lose focus on things that matter.
adamamida 2 years ago 31
@adamamida absolutely!
jjmdirector 1 year ago
@adamamida RON PAUL 2012!!!!!!!
wtfjaftw 10 months ago 3
@adamamida His name is Ron Paul!
LibertyMike1 9 months ago 5
@LibertyMike1 Every time he mentions the Fed Res, Bernanke dies a little inside.... I hope
Clyaton 8 months ago
What's the difference between, "choose to be ruled" verses "elect to be governed?" In the definition of "elect" is "choose;" one definition of 'governed" is "controlled." How about, "Chose to be controlled?"
groomdoggi 2 years ago
I think the primary distinction is between RULED and GOVERNED. Ruled implies a controlling authority operating under a dynamic "law." Governed implies an authority bound by a static law.
libertyeconomics 2 years ago
I see that too. That was just the "thought bite" I got out at that time. It's just semantics, and trying to create fear of the other side.
groomdoggi 2 years ago
There's a strong difference between "ruled" and governed". What he means by "ruled" is that the governmet takes away our choice and implements thier will instead of ours, whereas "governed" would mean to be organized and structured, yet given our freedom to live and choose how we may. He makes complete sense to me. That's the real conservative way - to have the people live in freedom while the government HELPS the people, not rules them. To have a government FOR the people.
switchhitter07 2 years ago
Being governed is different than being controlled. Choosing to be controlled makes no reference to the act of electing delegates to represent your individual interests. That's the difference between Goldwater and so many neo-conservatives. Goldwater believed in the power of the individual, while neo-cons support government oversight, just as much as they claim the democrats do. That is also why many consider Goldwater's views to be libertarian, rather than latter-day republican.
Tarwater03 2 years ago
It's amazing how current this is even if it was 45 years ago. Goldwater was yet another great man that was vilified by the liberal media.
If he had been president during Vietnam, imagine how much better things would have gone.
He might have scared the Viet Cong into submission without a single shot. (Yeah, I know probably not, but I think that things would have gone better for us anyhow).
capriracer351 2 years ago 6
yeah, LBJ did try to smear him as a nazi regardless of the fact the JFK's father actually supported the nazi party.
Ukelelemasta 2 years ago 4
He is very conservative even if he felt prochoice
ChaoticSouls 2 years ago 2
A lot of liberals point to Goldwater's pro-choice views to argue that he somehow "turned liberal" at the end of his life.
But I disagree. Although Goldwater may have been personally pro-choice, I don't think he would have supported Roe v. Wade on the grounds that it was a federal intrusion on states rights.
Regardless of his personal opinions, Goldwater was, above all, constitutionalist.
TinaCL 2 years ago 4
Goldwater was more of a libertarian than anything else.
someguy23475 2 years ago 7
"...make government the servant, not the master of us all. In this free nation, we do not choose to be ruled--we elect to be governed."
Can we just bring Goldwater back to life?
TinaCL 3 years ago 29
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I only wish. I'd hope he'd be more socially conservative if we brought him back though.
JohnRhysMusician 2 years ago
No way! Goldwater's greatest virtue was that the Federal Government had no rule in determining how individuals should live their life. I do not want the do-gooders telling me how to live my life. Haven't they done enough to erode our precious few freedoms?
marcparella 2 years ago 4
Social conservatives are the ones tearing this country apart and Goldwater knew it.
surfingthechaos 2 years ago 5
@surfingthechaos What are social conservatives?
67nairb 11 months ago
@67nairb
Social conservatives are those who argue against, abortion, gay marriage, stem cell research and produce laws that are faith based initiatives.
shiftstart 11 months ago
@67nairb People who want to use the government to enforce their own cultural beliefs.
surfingthechaos 11 months ago
@TinaCL It would be nice. He died in 1998.
67nairb 11 months ago