George Harrison - "Awaiting On You All" Take 1

[rohanwotan2]

Thank you so much for sharing this! I like the "produced"" version very much, but this has an incredible charm to it......Better? Not sure, but I really like it and I love the genuine character it has. Thank you!

[WarfareReach]

Kaiser me trajo aqui =D

[WarfareReach]

Kaiser me trajo aqui =D

[chxavier2]

Wait me on Nirvana, Pandit! Love you Lord. Hare Sri George Harrison.

[marvy1118]

Sounds like something you'd hear on Barney or some PBS kiddie show.



[WallOfSound1990]

the released version is better

[789TheBeatles]

best george harrison outtake ever

[sunriseRISE]

oh this is so much better.. than that ''foking unplayable'' overblowen '' george harrison debut peice of shite' all things must pass''--'' christ this is how its meant to be-- even the words sound better=and what a great voice

[gietek]

All things Must Pass would sound SO MUCH BETTER without that bloody wall of sound. Forget the murder, Spector should be charged for fucking up George's best album.

[matiguri]

@gietek You are so right. I wish George had actually remixed the whole album. The remixes from the soundtrack of "Living in the Material World" show how much could be gained. Hopefully we will see a release of the remixed "All Things Muset Pass"!

[grevejp44]

@gietek I disagree, I still love the Spector wall of sound. I think it would sound too empty if it sounded like this.  That being said this is still a nice quite version that is also great.

[thistlewindpics]

Gorgeous George has been gone almost 10 years. What a beautiful, God-conscious soul. I think of him everyday; my inspiration and definitely the best Beatle!

[BeastofRock3]

@thistlewindpics rock on man!

[GOLDENFLYWARRIOR]

WOW......I LISTEN TO GEORGE MORE NOW THAN EVER. HIS DEATH WAS 10 YEARS AGO THIS NOVEMBER 29th. CANCER KILLS MANY IN SUCH A PAINFUL WAY. GEORGE WAS WAY AHEAD OF THE BULL SHIT COMMERICAL MANTERIAL SHIT. I WISH HE HAD A CHURCH FOR ALL TO COME. I TRUSTED IN IS WISDOM...NOT THE POPE LIES OF ORGANIZED RELIGION. HINDU IS THE OLDEST, YET MANY TYPES. FOR NOW I SETTLE FOR MUSIC, YOGA, HELPING ANIMALS AND NOT EATING OR WEARING THEIR FUR OR SKIN. WISH PEOPLE WERE MORE KIND. THESE ARE SOME EVIL TIMES! AGAIN!

[BeastofRock3]

@GOLDENFLYWARRIOR Nah George Harrison was different than that, sure he was a hindu and he was a vegetarian and all that but what George is saying y'gotta love everybody.

I think he believed in god y'know the god/s not religion and that's what I take from George

[GOLDENFLYWARRIOR]

WOW......I LISTEN TO GEORGE MORE NOW THAN EVER. HIS DEATH WAS 10 YEARS AGO THIS NOVEMBER 29th. CANCER KILLS MANY IN SUCH A PAINFUL WAY. GEORGE WAS WAY AHEAD OF THE BULL SHIT COMMERICAL MANTERIAL SHIT. I WISH HE HAD A CHURCH FOR ALL TO COME. I TRUSTED IN IS WISDOM...NOT THE POPE LIES OF ORGANIZED RELIGION. HINDU IS THE OLDEST, YET MANY TYPES. FOR NOW I SETTLE FOR MUSIC, YOGA, HELPING ANIMALS AND NOT EATING OR WEARING THEIR FUR OR SKIN. WISH PEOPLE WERE MORE KIND. THESE ARE SOME EVIL TIMES! AGAIN?

[ThwompKid]

"And while the pope owns 51% of general motors

And the stock exchange is the only thing hes qualified to quote us.."

[schpoogie]

@ThwompKid Did you know that George had a personal wealth of hundreds of millions of dollars?

He is a hypocrite for critisizing the pope, and a shameful one. He claimed to have 'spiritual enlightenment' but the monetary value of his pride was too much for him to give up.

I mean, doesnt it just make you angry? I heard him say in an interview "we need to get rid of greed"....but according to his philosophy, owning 400 million dollars does not count as greed!

HYPOCRITE

[RS1Comedy1Vids]

@schpoogie

What's the matter? Did you forget about the Concert for Bangladesh? And the fact that he was the first musician to do such a thing? Also, I don't see how owning 400 million dollars is greedy, he earnt that money, and did philanthropy work.

[schpoogie]

@RS1Comedy1Vids My point was that he was a hypocryte for critising the pope. I have no problem with rich people, just hypocrytes. Yes I remember the Concert for Bangladesh, but look at it this way; George himself could have given 50 million dollars from his own pocket in the aid efforts, instead he holds a concert and lets the public do the work (and the concert only raised 200 thousand).

400 million dollars is greedy, no doubt about it, not when 1 billion people are starving everyday

[RS1Comedy1Vids]

@schpoogie

You're confusing me. You have no problem with rich people, yet people with 400 million dollars net worth annoy you. And you still haven't said why he's a hypocrite for criticising the pope. Hey, look at it this way - at least Harrison isn't the one with a money laundering scandal.

[schpoogie]

@RS1Comedy1Vids Sorry let me clarify; I have no anger towards millionares....only anger towards millionares who tell us to donate money (people like Bono and Oprah). Now George Harrison specifically said in an interview "we need to get rid of greed and money" and YET he had hundreds of millions. (you can find the interview on the 'material world foundation' website). He's criticising the pope for havning interests in money "51% of G.M." but HE himself had MILLIONS

[RS1Comedy1Vids]

@schpoogie

Ok, you can think what you want, but I still don't see how it is hypocritical. Maybe after earning that money he realised that money isn't everything? You hear this sort of thing all the time when it comes to lottery winners. Bear in mind, this song was written in 1970, I doubt he had 400 million then.

[schpoogie]

@RS1Comedy1Vids It's hypocritical because he never gave away 99% of his money when he was the one who said "we need to get rid of greed in this world". If he realised that money isn't everything then he would have given it away by the bulk-loads....he just came out of the most popular band of all time; OF COURSE HE HAD HUNDREDS OF MLLIONS. Google "George Harrison's net worth" and you will see.

[RS1Comedy1Vids]

@schpoogie

That's probably his net worth at the time of his death, or somewhere near. I really doubt he had hundreds of millions in 1970 - musicians then definitely didn't get anywhere near the money they get today.

[schpoogie]

@RS1Comedy1Vids What's the difference? The point is that he still had 400 million dollars. If he said in the 1970's to give up wealth but then changed his mind once he became a millionare then he is still a hypocrite

[ThwompKid]

@schpoogie The Pope line in this song has absolutely nothing to do with how one dispenses or retains their wealth. I'm not sure if you misunderstood or you're just picking up on one part.

[schpoogie]

@ThwompKid What's the difference? If the Pope owns 51% of General Motors then the Pope has an unreasonable interest in money. George himself had an unreasonable intrest on money, owning over 400 million dollars, for someone who claims to be 'spiritual' just shouldn't have that amount of dough.....and he was saying that about the pope...."how can he be the truth when he's got so much interest in money". Harrison had no mirrors in his mansion at Friar Park obviously

[ThwompKid]

@schpoogie You're picking on a very, very small part of his entire life. He wasn't money crazy.. He wouldn't have earned that much if he was. He's left his wealth to his family and their families. He lived comfortably while he was alive, not in excess.

[schpoogie]

@ThwompKid He had 400 million dollars. People in Africa can't even make $1 a day! Harrison should be ashamed of himself

[ThwompKid]

@schpoogie haha, It's barely worth replying to you.

[schpoogie]

@ThwompKid Life's too short for arguing over such things

[ThePtitbreton35]

Amazing !

[seltaebgirl]

Thanks for this

[ladyterrific]

Fantastic!

[mac3079b]

from new George Cd..

[iamvegito]

@mac3079b What new George CD? I want it!

[mac3079b]

Living In the Material World delux edition (Dvd+Cd)