So glad that I live in a one participant consent state. I do not need you permission to record a conversation between you and me. Thanks for recording this Bill
@TheGrayman1234 The NH 'wiretapping' statute, 570-A, still clearly requires an "expectation of privacy" -- non-existent on a public street -- before any consent is necessary, let alone for "officers of government" who are, per NH Constitution Part First, Article 8, "at all times accountable" to the People. Unfortunately, that doesn't stop the state from ignoring those sections, as in my own still-pending case, for as long as they can drag it out. Good thing taxpayers love wasting money, eh...?
@bikerbillnh No doubt. As long as someone is not interfering in the duties of the officer, ANYONE should be allowed to record Video and Audio of the officer while he is performing a public service.
@stealthgerm It would benefit whoever was being thus framed, as well as the taxpayers who won't have to pay the corrupt cop's salary anymore (in theory, anyway). Not to mention benefiting the underlying rule of law. As the 1st Circuit's 'Glik' ruling and my own acquittal have confirmed, the cop has no expectation of privacy on the job. I don't understand what you're getting at.
@bikerbillnh your opiion is worth squat,its the judge's opinion that matters .though i agree with you.corrupt cops as you put do what they are taught anfd told.c0rrupt cops?? its more the culture of cops thats the problem.culture is far more difficult to correct.off duty cops do deserve privacy.on the job vidio taping benifits cops and public.transparancy is good for both
@stealthgerm If a cop is planting evidence, then by definition, he's corrupt. He's rejecting the rule of law. He's violating his oath, his trust, and his fiducial responsibility. And collecting evidence of such a crime is not illegal. Still not sure what any of this has to do with this video directly. And again, the outcome of this particular bill has been rendered largely moot by my own recent acquittal on such 'wiretapping' charges, so "the judge" already agrees with my opinion.
So glad that I live in a one participant consent state. I do not need you permission to record a conversation between you and me. Thanks for recording this Bill
TheGrayman1234 6 months ago
@TheGrayman1234 The NH 'wiretapping' statute, 570-A, still clearly requires an "expectation of privacy" -- non-existent on a public street -- before any consent is necessary, let alone for "officers of government" who are, per NH Constitution Part First, Article 8, "at all times accountable" to the People. Unfortunately, that doesn't stop the state from ignoring those sections, as in my own still-pending case, for as long as they can drag it out. Good thing taxpayers love wasting money, eh...?
bikerbillnh 6 months ago
@bikerbillnh No doubt. As long as someone is not interfering in the duties of the officer, ANYONE should be allowed to record Video and Audio of the officer while he is performing a public service.
TheGrayman1234 6 months ago
@bikerbillnh so if video shows police man planting evidence.whos privacy concern is that.who will it benifit
stealthgerm 3 months ago
@stealthgerm It would benefit whoever was being thus framed, as well as the taxpayers who won't have to pay the corrupt cop's salary anymore (in theory, anyway). Not to mention benefiting the underlying rule of law. As the 1st Circuit's 'Glik' ruling and my own acquittal have confirmed, the cop has no expectation of privacy on the job. I don't understand what you're getting at.
bikerbillnh 3 months ago
@bikerbillnh your opiion is worth squat,its the judge's opinion that matters .though i agree with you.corrupt cops as you put do what they are taught anfd told.c0rrupt cops?? its more the culture of cops thats the problem.culture is far more difficult to correct.off duty cops do deserve privacy.on the job vidio taping benifits cops and public.transparancy is good for both
stealthgerm 3 months ago
@stealthgerm If a cop is planting evidence, then by definition, he's corrupt. He's rejecting the rule of law. He's violating his oath, his trust, and his fiducial responsibility. And collecting evidence of such a crime is not illegal. Still not sure what any of this has to do with this video directly. And again, the outcome of this particular bill has been rendered largely moot by my own recent acquittal on such 'wiretapping' charges, so "the judge" already agrees with my opinion.
bikerbillnh 3 months ago