Added: 1 year ago
From: eldadxl
Views: 189,457
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (492)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • not a scratch! who would hold their hand up to their face THAT LONG? and talking to who? Maybe a time or space traveler but not a cell phone. a radio of some kind? a Star Trek communicator? Beam me up Scotty!

  • It's a 4S..!

  • Nothing is explained here! You lied! Stupid reposting...

  • As Mr. Hyde, the hero hit him so hard he's wearing an icepack.

    Or a common man in a common slicker with a contrasting scarf rehearsing what he's going to tell his wife that suspects that he's having an affair with a dancing girl .. with a broken tooth from that dancing girl...

  • there is no that type of sequence in "the circus" movie sorry

  • Kadın az işitiyor duymasına yardımcı olan bir araç kullanıyor yoksa telefon falan degil inanmayın

  • It just goes to show that everyone in the world is fucking crazy - case and point that being a BLOKE not a woman.

  • it's a cell phone and she is talking to phone and they soon will find a "Handsfree" too :D

  • yes, it was a time traveler but not a regular cell phone. this communicator is functional adhoc with g-com technology.

  • Don't try to understand ignorance. stay focused on what you know in your heart is true and truth is all you will see. Just be conscience and see past all the diversions.

  • If it is on the extras videos on a dvd. They probably faked footage and put this in there by accident or they have some other agenda that involves people needing to believe in time travel. We live on a planet where deceit is accepted as normal. peace

  • Just thinking in the realm of our times, we couldn't imagine what civilization is capable of even 100 years from now. Maybe if this is a time traveler, the tech they use may not need modern day cell towers. Communication could be on an entirely different level many generations from now.

    If you think 2011, you'll only perceive what's possible now.

    Think ahead. It might get us somewhere.

  • its just a hearing device and what if shes craziy and just talking to herself and wouldn't someone notice that someone had a cell phone if i was at that time i would want to look at it

  • she was also talking - her chin was moving up and down!

  • Comment removed

  • ok, everyone's looking at this like it's black and white (no pun intended...lol, okay, maybe a little lol) - it's 1 extreme or another .Well, there is NO way it's a cell phone for many reasons. however, that's a REALLY long time to have her hand there, just to scratch or something. also, she is CLEARLY talking. but why couldn't she have just had some random object in her hand, lifted her hand to grab her hat or scratch, and have been talking to herself? it's that simple.

  • no manches

  • Actualy, that is a real phone and you can see the antenna in the close up.

  • @sweet6b9

    ok heres a thought

    it it has an antenna don't u think thats kinda of an old phone don't u think that if it was a time traveler it would b from the future where the technology is more advance than it is today i suck at explaining but ok lets put it out this way

    2011 iphone evo htc an no technology for time travel at all!!!

    if she came from the future she would probaly come idk lets say the year 2999 she would hav a friggan Itropple-a-tops idk some advanced shit

    so yeaa

  • @dapanda55smoot11 No my friend, It would have to look like something from that time frame.. And time travelers come from various periods of time, not all from the super advanced future.. Some come from experiments and tests for the first time travel experiments.. There is mention of this in the Billy Meier Contact Notes also.. Also notice that in the "Art Bell Single Seven" videos, he clearly says there are shielded satelites around the Planet.

  • This old lady is a man, maybe michael jackson disguised (look at the big big foots). But the face is the same as the "wishmaster" one .. And it's looking at us !

  • That's explanation in the video is wrong! A sort of cellphone of the future will not necessarily look of feel, or have the shape of a cellphone of TODAY, specially if the device is design for TIME TRAVEL, and not just for REAL TIME COMMUNICATING !

  • yes she's a time traveler!!xx

  • I bet her roaming charges are insane!

  • couple of things need to be explained what and who is she talking to.

    and why  did he/she stop and look at the camera toward the end.

  • Even though I don't think its a time traveler, I still find this extremely odd. I don't think its a hearing aid either. I just don't know. What the fuck is going on? Lol

  • @wolfwolfenstein I agree, I dont think it was time but that shit needs to be explained. She is talking to someone there is no getting around that

  • Comment removed

  • If it were a time traveler, he would know this footage was found before going on that trip, therefore preventing it from happening, if of course he wanted to cover up the fact. If not, guess he just wanted to be on youtube, IN THE PAST!!! :O Either case being, it still disproves time travellers. Seeing that footage, he would now have to do the exact same movements at that exact time when he goes on that trip or cause a paradox. Besides, look him... He looks like an idiot.

  • That video doesn`t belongs to Circus... It was made many years later...it`s a FAKE!.. BUT time travelers exists, but not on this movie... Nostradamus knew a time traveler..

  • maybe thats the biggest boombox a widowed upper middle aged white woman woman could afford back then, give her a break.

  • I can't believe that people actually think that time travelers exist.

  • The guy in front of her doesn't have a nose. THAT'S WEIRD!

  • The point is... I don't think she knows how to use the phone. and I don't think there is telecom company.

  • I think she or he(look to the big foots!!!) is using a 1920's hearing aid(In the early 1920s, people used hearing aids that you needed to hold up to your ears. Looks just like a cellphone.Oticon was founded in 1904 in Denmark by Hans Demant whose wife was hearing impaired) or a Lutz Ferrando Ear Trumpet and Etui(An early 20th century telescopic ear trumpet in its original crocodile skin etui). Google it and think yourself!

  • I don't believe that she's scratching her head. Look before it goes off her, she's obviously talking into something....

  • what a waste of time....................

  • Comment removed

  • nits of the past, crushing your dreams of time travel in the future.

  • No lo puedo creer :O En esa época se supone que ellos ni sabían que se podía crear un celular! :O Y los telefonos, ni hablar de ello.

  • Of course the "time traveler" would not want anyone to know, so she/he would disguise it as an itch. If it is an itch, she/he was itching for a long time. What is convincing for the cellphone argument is that she/he seems to talk to it and smile and nod. It is odd how she/he disappears when she turns her/his head to the camera. At this point we cannot know what actually happened, and need to stop drawing conclusions on very very little evidence.

  • the pont is that in 1928 there was no cell phones

  • Well I don't know about you but when I scratch an itch, I scratch for 2 or 3 seconds tops.

  • Her hands move a bit, and that's way to long to be scratching. Anyways when you get really close up there looks to be a black object in her hand, I'm sure her hand does not cast that much of a shadow. As well as her lips are obviously moving when you see the close up. she is holding something, no one scratches their head with such scrunched up hands... I know i sure as heck dont

  • Its NOT A CELL PHONE, its a hearing aid!!

    Maybe, you can find it in Google, i read it on the german yahoo news.

  • As a time traveler I've appeared talking on my cell phone in many movies. I don't understand the point of this video.

  • @bigboy45454545 LMAO :-)

  • thi is impossible because THERE WERE NO TOWERS so ITS IMPOSIBBLE TO TALK ON A CELL PHONE!

  • @Dumnum16 Just a speculation, but if it is form the future, is it not possible that they have created a way for a phone to have it's own signal and maybe its a special phone. We will never know.

  • @Dumnum16 Maybe she comes from the year 2998, maybe we don't need towers anymore in 2998. And maybe there is one guy in 2998 who can make this 'time machine". You'll never know.

    Haha, but I don't believe it myself either :)

  • maybe sreatkching the head....and talking alone

  • ok but if u people really think about it, there were no cell phone towers back then and even if she was from the future which is rediculous how could she talk on a cell fone if there is no towers.. im thinking maybe a walkie talkie or possibly a small radio or she could just be crazy.. u grown ppl can not really think it would be a cell fone from a time traveller? lol

  • The best possible xplanation for all this is....CAN U HEAR ME NOW....Verizon goes way back,back in time...i guess they do have the best coverage..they say..

  • If you look closely while the screen is enlarged, you can pause as she walks by and see that her hand is wrapped around something tightly, and the end of something that looks like it has a screen. Now wither this is a cell from the future or from the past like an older Nokia is a question to me O_O I do believe however that she is talking into it. You can obviously see her lips moving as she turns to the camera. Just saying people. Believe what you see it's right there in front of you

  • What makes this a great find and a good video, is the fact that no one can explain what is actually happening here. We know she can't be talking on a cell phone. Or is She? We would not have asked that question before science fiction novels took a hold of our collective thoughts and minds. Sorry everyone, but I think is is a Cell Phone . . .or not.

  • Hearing aid. before modern tech, hearing aids wouldnt actually fit in the ear (unless you had really large ears) and you actually had to hold it up to your ear. This lady, or man not real sure, was only tryin to listen in on hollywood and emiting "walla" which is a filler sound almost all movies use for background talking or acting.

  • yes it looks as though she is chatting as well but her clothing is of the period

  • yes it looks as though she is chatting as well

  • Why are people seriously wondering about this? Couldn't this just be someone with a tooth ache walking down the street clutching their jaw in pain? Maybe they have sensitive ears and they're protecting themselves from some noise on the street? There are probably dozens of possibilities and we all know time travel is not one of them. Discovery Channel has lost some integrity be actually taking this seriously. If this film was "discovered" in the 1970s, no one would be suggesting time travel.

  • @Tennable there could be hundreds of reasons but TIME TRAVEL???

    come on how stupid can man get? i agree with you it could be hand held wireless radio or anything in the world

  • the thing is though.. is that if you put your hands to you head as if you were holding your phone, then move your middle and index finger backwards, you're actually holding your ear. come on? i'm sure you must have thought of this before you posted a whole video about it stating that 'she's scratching her head' tbh, why would you scratch your ear like that? abnormal. yeah?

  • simply jewish grandma out of jew dentist chamber ...of errors

  • Lady Gaga From The past 0_o

  • there's DEFINATELY some thin black object in her/his hand. fact. you can see it as clear as day. you can even see the shadow cast on her/his cheek. i don't think photoshop existed in 1928, but also there were no mobile phone masts back then either! iv'e seen this clip on a higher resolution than on here and at the top of the "phone," where the antenna used to be on older phones, there is a strange triangular shape. could be a flesh & blood god (does walk different). time travel is less likely.

  • I REALLY don't think she's a time traveller holding a phone, tbh.

    Buuuttt.... when she turns around she does like laugh/smile and it looks like she's saying something. Or is that to do with the whole thing? I've never seen it.

    xx

  • i dont really see the fingers going up and down and you can see an object in her hand

  • now I get it she is some psycho who talking in to amplifier :D

  • how come no one has thought to ask the elephant what was happening? they live about 200 years right? he should still be around and they never forget

  • the actuality of this is that she has one of those old ass hearing aids...not like the ones we have today that are like blue tooth sets, but the old damn ones you see them make fun of that look like a miniature cornucopia.

  • @MrCoolgenes the angles do line up, however, look closer...her fingers are too low to be touching he brim. She is NOT holding her hat.

  • she is clearly talking on some cellular device

  • @GreaserCoolRider as crazy as it sounds, at this point I tend to agree with you, G.

  • It appears she is holding something in her hand that looks like some kind of device for talking! Take a look on other videos of this...

  • she s talking to somebody...or to herself maybe?

  • The scene is part of a short film included in the extras section of the film "The Circus" by Charles Chaplin, 1928, and is the public going to the premiere of the film at the Manns Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, California. It is not a part of the movie "The Circus", but it is a piece filmed in 1928, taken to the people who wandered in front of the room where the movie premiered.

  • @deskstar2008 CORRECTION;  it was SID GRAUMANS CHINESE THEATER. It became MANNS much, much later on...I know, I am a L.A./Hollywood homie.

  • @StellarBlue1 Ok, Thanks for the correction.

  • ESTA ESCENA NO EXISTE EN LA PELICULA THE CIRCUS, ES UN INVENTO, Y SI COMPARAN ESTA ESCENA CON LA PELICULA VERDADERA SE VAN A DAR CUENTA DE L A DIFERENCIA EN LA TONALIDAD DE LOS GRISES. DENTRO DE TODO ES UNA BUENA IMITACION DE LOS FILMES DE ESA EPOCA.

  • @lapalandita La escena es parte de un cortometraje incluido en la sección de extras de la película "The Circus" de Charles Chaplin, del año 1928, y se ve al público yendo al estreno de la película en el Manns Chinese Theatre, en Hollywood, California. No es parte de la pelicula "The Circus", pero si es un fragmento filmado en 1928,

    tomado a la gente que deambulaba frente a la sala donde se estrenaba la pelicula.

  • Comment removed

  • If it supposed to be a cell phone, where is the digital cell tower transmitting/receiving the call?

  • According to imdb.com the movie The Circus "Release Date:

    1928 (Turkey)".In the year 1925 Western Electric Model 34A "Audiphone" Carbon Hearing Aid was on the market. It makes sense beacuse the device was released in year 1925. Three years later this movie was released. Plus if that really is a phone, how could he use it if at that time there was no signal, sattelites werent even invented at the time. Peace.

  • only dumb americans and swedes belive this shit. the whole world is laughing at you muhahahaha

  • I've seen some weird schtuff - this is right up there - man in bad drag - talking on a mobile - in 1928.............very weird indeed. Title of clip is clearly misleading though. Should be called "My theory on the time traveler from The Circus 1928". Because that is all you have.....a theory.

  • Her mouth was moving you can clearly see that, and she is holding something, freaky 

  • 1928...19-FUCKING-28 there were no cell phones back then jeesh people...it may look like it but how can you have cell phones before sound films and television?

  • @KamikazeLive How??  With TIME TRAVEL!!!

  • whats!! in 1928 this movie, the lady is talking over HANDPHONE??? really? had such Nokia or other? before my birthday though.

  • @Ryon569 LMAOF :-))))

  • Hmmm, si lo ves detenidamente te darás cuanta que ella esta hablando, mueve los labios y se rie, a menos que estuviera loca y hable sola mientras se rasca la cabeza, es valido, pero en realidad si parece que sostuviera algo en la mano y se ve claramente que habla y rie.... la pregunta real es.... Con quién estaba hablando!!! Si en esa epoca no existian torres celulares ni satélites, los cuales aparecerian hasta 30 años despues... vaya vaya!!

  • @Merekay te voy a decir algo muy congruente si acazo me quieres creer,el destino,el futuro ya esta pasando,nosotros somos el pasado la vida futura esta ocurriendo,en el futuro ya hay personas que si pueden viajar al pasado y son mucho mas inteligentes que ahora de donde cres tu que sale la technologia que tenemos ahora. TODO ES POSIBLE

  • she clearly is holding a square object... you can see the objects corner's shadow... so you didn't explain shit

  • @lukacho5 Does your mother knows you are posting comments using such language?

  • @eldadxl What a stupid comment.

  • @eldadxl you tell your parents everything you do? thats messed

  • @eldadxl dude when you post video explaining something you must have strong arguments... you can't just go around saying "she is scratching her head because she moves index and middle fingers" or something like that.

  • @lukacho5 dumb kient, no one cares bout wat language he's using, nor wat language u'r using, just answer the flippin statement

  • @lukacho5 here here i think she is carrying an object poss, a fone, 9 seconds she on walking across and although hand stays there fingers only move at the end. If it was scratching here head fingers would move all through the scene. She / He definately looks like she/he chatting on fone. Ive watched it quite a lot too and can only say its a fone. Some say a hearing aid lol well who she listening and talking to then ?.

  • @lukacho5 EXACTLY, this video was straight bullshit

  • Maybe she was scatching her head whilst on the phone????!! lol

  • dis is fake. one of dis days in the future yu will know why

  • this doesnt explain shit. i've scratched my head while talking on a phone before

  • @wakeupdead Two key elements in your comment: shit head!

  • @eldadxl ok? so she is scratches her head, so? the fuck does that explain? is it not possible to hold a phone and scratch your head at the same time?? nice explanation you got there. ok, so she is obviously holding an object against her ear while talking through it..in 1928!by logic, it can't be a cell phone, and she can't possibly be a time traveler..however, even if its just a 'hearing aide device' why the fuck is she talking through it? to hear herself better? lol that's the real question...

  • Comment removed

  • WOW you dont know shit it was me i went back in TIME

  • Yeah I don't think its a woman.

  • Dude, the elephant is fucking scary..

  • @maloyculero I agree. lol I prefer the zebra...

  • FYI please

    watch?v=IUKNK_XfswY

  • @milansc inconclusive and I am not sure what is the point even if it is true

  • @eldadxl

    ok

    My point is that is much more likely that the video had been edited (incorrectly) than some "time traveller" had been caught on a roll of film.

    I don't even believe "the woman" was using the hearing aid device, because she was clearly deep into conversation (body language tells us when one gets too focused on something while walking, one usually stops walking).

    So, that's my point.

    The woman's shadow was not edited correctly, giving away that this is not what the original is like.

  • Even if she had a phone. She most likely would not get a signal.

  • @bloodsurf69 - I had this thought too. You then have to think outside the box and contemplate that another method of transmission was in action. If we REALLY push it tho, you have to ask why she would be talking into something she needs to hold. If she really was a time traveller, it would be more likely to be something discreet.

  • @bloodsurf69 lol

  • its mystery....i dont try to explain it, dont know how...

  • @Fakinjunykorn It's no mystery. It's a promotion stunt!

  • is it a woman - which is her shoes size - 46? Everything here is quite weird for me, but she s talking - why? And sth more - her behaviour looks exactly like of one, who s talking on a mobile - slowing down to look around, which direction shold take and etc. ?

  • @zitomir69 I guess they have large shoes in the future too ...

  • i care for people who talk to themselves, who talk to walls and think they're people. Are we sure shes not holding a scarf or tissue to her face and talking to herself? i doubt she's a time traveler. Maybe someones grandma who's reminding herself to get sugar and flour at the store.

  • ya i know that. and i know that ur being sarcastic now 2. if u google IYFD it tells u d wrong meaning. its just another joke thing. it means: In Your Face Disgrace, but again I'm only joking so don't take that seriously!!! LOL. :)

  • Now I think Will Smith is a fake! This is a real (B) MIB... (Big) Mama In Black !

    Here comes the mom in black....

  • It's absolutly fake. If you want to 'Time Travelers' look Andrew Carlssin, Rudolf Fenz, Kasper Hauser and David Lang. They are time travelers

  • @manupk24 what fake? so you mean they faked that she was talking on a cellphone in a movie from 1928? Explain the "faked" part.

  • @TheConnyB It is a montage, this video does not belong to the original film by Charles Chaplin. So I tell you, if you're looking for 'Mysteries' unresolved, look for those names. . not this, that all who seek to do this is money. Falsify something, just to sell. [Sorry if my English is bad, but I can not write well. . I'm using the Google Translator xD]

  • She says "Hey, Mom? Is that you? I'm on Youtube!!"

  • @ZanbusGuerra Correction:" Hey grandma, how are things in 1828? yes ... I'm calling from 1928 ... "

  • @eldadxl OMGGG lol. but... how they can talk cause it was no network in that time.... or she record her self in phone? it might be possible like what she saw in that time and tell everybody in future when she went back.

  • @eldadxl xD LOL "the crops are no more, I told you to harvest that since 1826. PS: Grandpa's still alive."

  • if she is time traveling, then why in those clothes?

  • but how come this movie has the same ringtone as they use in Nokia ringtone official nokia rngtone if u watch the original clip whoaaaaa

  • Ockham's razor.

  • Actually this finger scratching explanation is void. What does that indeed have anything to do. Look late in the clip and you an object in the hand that casts a straight edged shadow. There is definitely an object in the hand.

  • This is probably the genius Tesla in drag. He showed you didn't need power lines to provide power to homes, and you don't need cell towers either to use a cell device, before they sent him away. Not good for business.

  • While I am not convinced its a time traveler, I don't see how pointing out that two of her fingers scratched her head is proof she isn't a time traveler...

  • @AlleluiaElizabeth And I don't see how a mumbling dodgy old lady with an itch is a prove of time traveling

  • @eldadxl Where did I claim it was? And your response still doesn't explain why her scratching her head was proof she *wasn't* a time traveler. One has nothing to do with the other. Its a non sequitur.

  • @eldadxl @ TheConnyB trust me, I am away more evolved than u. And y are ye all takin this seriously, this whole thing is just a Halloween joke!!! But I was being serious coz it was making ye all think about it more seriously! Seriously ppl!! It's a 50/50 situation. It's either a time traveller or fake footage brought up around Halloween!! Do d words '' Trick or Treat " ring a bell 2 any1??? Emphasis on the word " TRICK ". LOL. :•} x

  • @Francie1997 - fake footage which is available on every 2 disc version of this movie, as it's in the special features. I've yet to see one plausable explanation as to what's happening in this shot.

  • @xb0xguru the scene is not on the original tape? have you seen it?

  • @TheConnyB - It's on disc 2 (special features) of the movie. How do you have the original tape of this when this wasn't released to the public until the DVD was released?

  • @xb0xguru yeah, how? *scratches his head

  • @TheConnyB - you're either being very cryptic or I'm having a completely different conversation with you :)

    This would not have been seen on the VHS version as extras etc only really became popular when a digital format was popular. It's my understanding that this footage in particular is not of the movie, but of a documentary. Therefore it would have only seen the light of day when the original reel was remastered to DVD. To clarify, I do NOT think this is fake but still not sure what it is!

  • @xb0xguru well, I was cryptic because I just asked you a question if you had seen it. I do not know myself. That this was only on the extras was new to me. I never said I HAD the original tape. But in some way, it seems that this discussion would have made someone actually take a look at the original tape recording.. To see if it´s there or not

    My conclusion to all this is: This video doesn´t prove that she is talking on a cellphone. It proves that it LOOKS like she is talking on a cellphone =)

  • @TheConnyB - absolutely. We would need to ascertain what is happening in order to come to a conclusion. Based on what we're seeing, it most definitely looks like she's holding something up to her ear and talking into it. As you say however, it's totally inconclusive as to what that might be (if anything). Most of these questions should be directed at the studios however as the original film would show more detail. If they had the original documentary reel prior to editing, that would be perfect.

  • @Francie1997 You say its a 50/50 chance that she is a time traveller or not. With your way of thinking there is a 50/50 chance that you will win a million at the lottery tomorrow. Either you will, or you won´t.

    So is it ok if I don´t trust you that you are more evolved than the rest of us, as you claim?

  • @TheConnyB again, I'm only messing!!! y are ye all taking it so seriously!!! oh and i didn't say i am more evolved than every1 here, i said i am more evolved than u, but believe what u want. ye ppl need 2 learn how 2 tell when a person is only messing r not but then again my theory could b true.....

  • @Francie1997 And you need to finish school and learn how to spell properly. You are 13. You are not more evolved than anyone. Cant even read what you´re writing!

  • Comment removed

  • @TheConnyB its called txt talk, u need 2 learn it, so ha that just proves how more evolved I am than u!!! Txt Talk-learn it, it might help u out in the future...

  • @Francie1997 I don´t "need to learn" how to spell like I was dropped behind a wagon.. Ok, you´re the most evolved person here.. Just the fact that you are able to decide that from 1-2 comments on Youtube is impressive in itself.. I´m not gonna argue with you. You are 13, You got a long way to go, kid :P

  • @TheConnyB ya o.k whateva. lighten up, I'm only messing with u!!! why can't u take a joke? and i don't really have a long way 2 go coz when it comes 2 education I'm in 2nd year in secondary school and I'm an A+ Honours student in every subject. so ha IYFD LOL whateva. not many ppl in this world have figured out the key 2 happiness: laugh love live life. so just laugh, i was only messing b4 in d other comments. :)

  • @Francie1997 Ahh ok, I dont know what IYFD means, but I bet it´s something hip and cool =) if you were just messing around, or so called "trolling", you should keep in mind that sarcasm is hard to pass along on the internet!

  • @Francie1997 - text talk should be taken out and shot. Learn to type with proper letters. You're in front of a keyboard, after all. How hard can it be?

  • @xb0xguru hello? i'm 13. I'm always gonna use txt talk coz its quicker 2 type + I'm just used 2 using it when I txt ppl. i don't wan2 b a time waster.

  • @Francie1997 - if you're 13, even more reason to get out of the habit now. You don't want to spend an extra minute typing up properly, but happy to waste other people's time as they try to decipher what you've written. We have a language and it's called English. If you can't converse then I suggest you don't participate.

  • @xb0xguru Is this good enough for you? I thought most people could speak and type and read text talk by now. Sorry for wasting your time. I can also speak English, French and Irish fluently. So I can converse and so I will participate. I only comment on this video because I want to find out the truth about it. - Are you happy now? Perfect English.

  • @Francie1997 - much better. Thanks! I could read that without needing to decode anything. Text talk isn't universal and has many variations. A multi-linguist as yourself should understand this and be sympathetic to others trying to read it. Finally if you're going to insult people and follow it with a 'just kidding', nobody here will want to discuss anything with you.

  • @xb0xguru O.k. Sorry if I insulted anyone.

  • @Francie1997 Sorry to jump in, but you should read a book called 1984. It's by George Orwell, it was written before cell phones were invented. Funny thing is, they use text talk called "Newspeak". It's very interesting, also kind of scary.

  • She's a time traveler!

    She will kill us all! :))) xD

  • Sorry, nice try eldadxl. But it is possible to move those fingers and still hold on to a device which is clearly visible under the palm.

  • the lady's footsteps are exactly synchronized with the guy in front of her...this is fuckin trippy