North tower of world trade center collapse

[tastytastfood]

@dbmyers2 Yer simple really, every fucking crack whore knows what it takes to bring down this complicated structure...right guys?

Hey check out these fags ae911truth these so called fully qualified and practising Architectures and Engineers actually think they are qualified to say no plane could take down these skyscrapers...pffft fucking morons

[tastytastfood]

Thank you Based NWO for our successful and meaningful war in the Middle-East!! good job :D

[xXull]

@MrJeggus In san francisco here after a tanker crash gasoline burnt through three levels of the bridge causing the portion with the gasoline covering the steel to collapse straight down one level after the other without deviation or sway architects typically design skyscrapers to crumble downward in disaster for example many high hotels here are built to crumble in a certain way if a bad earthquake hits. We say here "Don't rent a room on the first floor" survival is more likely on the top floor.

[guitarguy092]

yes, the steel broke from the stress of a couple extra tons of weight, should have put more effort into building the structure, thanks for the intelligent input Mr. Architect

[kerryj3]

you have no idea you dont wiring for explosion c4 you arse get a life whach the explosion at the top its clear you mongo

[symboy]

Physics, Gravity, and Jet Fuel!! Simple!

[nnasser007]

GOOD 2001

[royalassassin2010]

@nnasser007 Rot in Hell =)

[anthonyc31]

Wake up ... it was a controlled nuclear demolition, which is the ONLY thing that can take down those towers and turn them to pulverized dust. Dimitri Khalezov 911 documentary will blow your mind. its on my channel.

[2BCBattlefield]

How about millions of innocent people who died in the middle east by USA bombings?

Who gives a fuck about them I guess. This is America after all.

[JamesJablonski2008]

@2BCBattlefield i agree with

[flblover1123]

ugh.. I don't remember the attack but I remember having to stay home for it though :/

[Skullmonkey131]

JESUS!

[geicomastah37]

Yes, the fire weakens the steel beams. Try holding a paperclip to a fire, and you can bend it super easy with a pair of scissors. Same principle, larger scale. Black smoke also results from toxins burning, noliesundead, and there is tons of asbestos

[wmcneill1]

A few thousand investment bankers perished and this video suggests that they are now in heaven. Come on! When they were jumping out the building or being crushed by it, the only thing going through their mind was "is this going to impact my yearly bonus?" Jesus made it clear that no persons who love money can love God. I'm regret that you will never find somebody from Wall Street in heaven.

[iloveneytiri]

@wmcneill1 What are you talking about? God doesn't exist, neither does heaven. If you honestly believe and have blind faith whilst ignoring all the evidence you must be an idiot.

[MrGogo4Gaga]

THE USA GOVERNMENT WAS NOT BEHIND THIS ATACK

THE USA GOVERNMENT WAS WANRED AND WERE GIVEN A INSIGHT THAT A TERRORIST ATTACK OF THIS PHENOMENON WOULD OCCUR.BUSH IGNORED SIGNS AND WHEN IT HAPPENED USED IT TO HIS ADVANTAGE TO ENTER IRAQ FOR OIL.BUT HE NEVER ASSISTED THEM RETARDS

BLESS AND R.I.P. VICTIMS <3333

[Hells2TheYea]

@MrGogo4Gaga,

What's your definition of assist? Did you know you can go to jail for not reporting a crime? If you saw someone in a car accident and didn't report, you can go to jail for that. You know that, right? They knew about and did nothing about it, that's ASSISTING.

[MrGogo4Gaga]

tHE CONSPIRACIES ARE NOT REAL

1) bOMBS WERE NOT PLANTED IN THE BUILDING)A DEMOLITION REQUIRES A SUFFICENT AMOUT OF TIME TO WORK OUT. tHE JET FUEL AND SPEED OF THE AIRPLANE WAS ENOUGH TO LET THE BUILDING COLLAPSE

THE PLANE CRASHED AND THE FIRES MELTED THE STEEL A LITTLE BIT.WEAKING THE STRUCUTRE OF THE WALLS AND LEVELS.

THEN AS THE DEBRIS AND BUILDING WENT DOWN,THE COMPRESSION OF AIR BLEW OUT THE WINDOWS ) NO BOMBS DID THIS FOOLS)

[MrGogo4Gaga]

ANTI-AMERICAN MILITANTS (RADICAL MUSLIM EXTREMISTS) WERE BEHIND THE 9/11 ATTACKS.IT WAS CAREFULLY PLANED,THE HIJACKERS WERE READING INSTRUCTIONS AND PREPARING THE DAY BEFORE TO BOARD THE PLANES .AL-QADEA MASTERMINDS(BIN LADEN AND HIS SUPREME COMMANDERS)PLANNED,ORGANIZED AND UITILIZED THE HIJACKERS TO ENTER COCKPIT,KILL PILOTS,TAKE CONTROL OF PLANES.THEY WERE ORDERED TO CRASH)NEVER TAUGHT TO LAND.THE CONSIPARICIES ARE NOT SUPPORTED WITH FACTUAL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.

[The4Luis]

god bless those who died.

[Mrexantexan]

It's pretty insane that those in the news cant even say like god bless the people inside of there now. Because there was thousands of them.

[BAZ6012]

these preparations could have been made when the world trade center was first being made bush and his dad where freinds with the bin laden family this could have been planed from then till years to come

[yankesboy2]

anyone who thinks that this was a "controlled demolition" is an idiot. Do you have any idea how much prep work and man power is involved for that? Every single support beam would have to be exposed. Countless holes would need to be drilled. Miles of wiring that would be found after the towers fell. There is no conspiracy. Get over it you drama queens. We were attacked by foreign terrorists. Anyone that believes anything else probably belives that people had dinosaurs as pets.

[dapoedog]

what you say is hypocritical you say so much prep work and man power is involved in that yet two planes i suppose perfectly placed brought them down.I am not going to pretend i know what happened that day but i know you certainly do not.why dont you check out verinage a french demolition tech. this is what a pancake collapse looks like and if youd open your eyes you would notice the clear contridictions between them.

[graphattic]

Your view is perfectly respectable and welldone. Only few details.

1) After the collapse you could not trace desks, telephones, people, tv sets or even much concrete. HOw exactly would there be any trace of wiring when almost everything is a grey dustpile. 2) Wiring occurs in the building anyway. 3) The prep work you say would be in a "Clean Demolition" with no collateral damage. If this was a demolition though, nobody would care for collateral damage. So just dont play the alknowing entity.

[XxDizzyBxX]

@yankesboy2 you dont have to an architect to know that there is no way that building would collapse in that way from a fire. the black smoke indicates that the fire is not oxygenated so it wouldnt be very hot either let alone hot enough to melt steel supports. and if it collapsed from the plane crash it would have done so seconds later or straight away

[noliesundead]

@XxDizzyBxX there is no way that building would collapse in that way from a fire...good thing thats not the story. only a twoofer lie.

black smoke indicates that the fire is not oxygenated.....so black smoke from candles and forest fires lack oxygen too? and fire needs oxygen to burn in the 1st place so it has to be oxygenated or it would not burn.

if it collapsed from the plane crash it would have done so seconds later or straight away ....according to what again? loose change?

[Seraph825]

@yankesboy2 I applaud you, I really do. I'm surprised by the amount of people who just don't realize that Al Qaeda did this.

[MIXEDUPTHROWNTOGETHR]

@yankesboy2 not to mention if bombs were being placed, wouldn't someone have noticed?

[dbmyers2]

After the first floor falls each successive floor lets go and falls on the one below it. Each fall of a floor creates a compression and a sound wave (i.e. an explosion). It is simple physics and gravity. Get a life!

[Sycorexxx]

@dbmyers2

You nailed it, gj.... Stupid Conspiracy morons...

[Hells2TheYea]

@dbmyers2,

There's something you're forgetting about "physics". It's not just about gravity. Steel/concrete floors don't just "let go and fall". The unaffected floors (4/5ths of building 1 and 2/3rds of building 2) creates RESISTANCE. FRICTION. INERTIA. That's physics.

[dbmyers2]

@Hells2TheYea. After the steel melts and the first floors fall the motion inertia and weight of each floor (i.e. mass in motion) wallops each next floor and the accumulation of mass as each floor is added to the accumulated mass and accelerating motion inertia, due to the acceleration of gravity becomes an overwelming force that overcomes unmelted steel lower down and any amount of resistance, friction, and stationary inertia. I never said just gravity. Physics includes motion inertia.

[CharlieH4ll]

@dbmyers2 There were no stack of floors found! If they did that, there would be a huge stack of floors that stayed together at the bottom! Thats why its called a pancake collapse! Its not a new term made up for 9/11! IT HAS HAPPENED! BUT THERE ARE NO PANCAKES HERE AT ALL! You understand that? NONE!

[dbmyers2]

@CharlieH4ll - Your talking off the top of your head. Learn some physics - particular the concepts of inirtia and mass X speed.

[dbmyers2]

@CharlieH4ll That should have read "learn some physics, particularly mass inirtia and mass X speed = massive dustruction not stacked pancakes.

[CharlieH4ll]

@dbmyers2 Yea, for the upper floors! Are you saying you know more than The National Institute of Science and Technology!? NIST has been avoiding the subject for ten years! Maybe you can explain YOUR laws of physics to them so they can come up with an excuse for why there werent any "pancakes" in the debris. I'm sure they will appreciate it, considering they wont have to pretend to not hear the question anymore.

[Waroftheworlds112]

@CharlieH4ll Pancaking is what occurs during a collapse, and if you read accounts from firefighters, some of them mention that they saw floors compressed together.

[CharlieH4ll]

@Waroftheworlds112 Your obviously slow, so I'll try to be as simple as possible. Concrete doesnt "compress" together with ANYTHING it breaks, it turns back to powder, and it can even remain almost completely intact. It does not compress. It does not give unless it breaks! Period! If you give me a link showing firefighters saying that the concrete floors compressed together, then I'll show you why the video was altered.

[crazyriders83]

@dbmyers2

It is physics, gravity, and thermite.

[brickie2410]

@dbmyers2 The towers shouldn't have fallen straight down. Even if they should've fallen, which they shouldn't have, it should have only been the top and it should have broken off because the towers were only damaged on one corner, two sides. THAT, is simple physics. Get a brain!

[nomanwahab]

it was totally a set up

[watchdog68]

I'm with all the psychotic conspiracy wack jobs who think explosives were planted in the buildings. In fact, I'll do one better. The two buildings didn't really fall. The World Trade Center is still there. It was just a made up thing, like "War of the Worlds." The news stations just wanted to scare everyone that day.

[enott93]

sheep

[SalDarkSeed]

they demolish buildings with people in them eh? great logic there and the people that jumped out of the tower all fake plastic dummies right??? or maybe that was computerized to look like people jumping out???

[revanteam]

in richmond i herd something sound like a big boom on this day 9/11/01

[fivecougarsoz]

The part I struggle to come to terms with is that this attack on humanity and the freedom of humanity was caused by humans.

[brianh1903]

i thought it was a demolition too and it might be. but i just noticed that the top starts collapsing first before it all goes down as if each floor crushes the next

[bweazel]

Watch closely, the antenna shifts down first before the collapse starts. The collapse started at the core. Where in the core, we can't be sure, but the core did fall first, pulling the rest of the building down with it.

[CharlieH4ll]

@brianh1903 Watch the footage of the south tower collapse. If you have a good eye you can see with out a doubt that the whole top falls off to the side! It should have only collapsed part of the side. Whether or not it would have collapsed after that.??? Who knows, cause some how half of the top of the building created a symmetrical collapse from there on! If you truely want to find out what happened you'll take a look for your self.

[eyesoverskies]

WHY didnt the official report just say that YES they were controlled demolitions? Ill bet they regret that.

because any rational, normal, able to think human being can plainly SEE with their eyes that they were controlled demolitions.

and if they were not, then WHY was building 7 already set up to fall and have larry Silverstien give instructions to pull it (on PBS)'

because THIS, WAS, PLANNED.

who planned it? is our security not so good? BS, we have the best intelligence n the world

[mmtot]

If you are able to research into secret societies you come to realise what happened that day.

[crazyflower2005]

your a fucking idiot

[eyesoverskies]

was JFK a fucking idiot? he told us about secret societies. There were MANY presidents who told us about secret societies. so whos the idiot? those who decide or are too scared to find the truth.

[runescape1888]

How could the government keep this a secret? Don't you think people would finaly realize "hey theres not a building there anymore". Your a disgrace to everyone who died that day.

[slacker3153]

You know reading your words is enough proof for me. Hey everybody, this guy is a definitive authority on all things related to the United States government. I bet he thinks Bush collaborated with Israel and all the Jews who supposedly "run" this country. I bet with your TS//SCI and all the proper compartment clearances you have you know everything there is to know anyways...right?

[runescape1888]

Seriously, if you think this was planned, you need help. Actually you should put yourself in jail so your stupidity won't spread.

[VioletZer0]

That video was kind of cool to be quite honest.

[MudbloodParselmouth]

I was a little kid on 9/11...I was like 6 or 7 years old...I was playing with my Molly doll from the Big Comfy Couch....I didn't know. Nobody told me.

[87spades]

i live in New York and i was sleeping when the towers colapsed.when i woke up all i saw was smoke

[roosevelthighschool]

I remember that day like it was yesterday.

[Always4GearsOfWar]

i was there that day, i didnt see the first cras, but i saw a plane go into the tower

[sawzaw203]

There were no planes used that day!! Get used to it. Also, even if there were, jet fuel could not destroy BOTH towers in the same fashion, within an hour of each other.

[conormahony2k8]

shatterblast ure a mongo .. 2 planes hit the towers what made u say there were bombs in it u arsehole ..

[eyesoverskies]

over 100 itnesses on NEWS footage released showed testimony of BOMBS going off, many bombs. some ppl still alive from BOMB explosions. "There were bombs in the bldgs" said over and over by those who were THERE. on news footage taped by anchor ppl. refute that.

[brentoneccles]

lns824, what lies.

[lns824]

These planes were not in the air for very long which means their was plenty of jet fuel in them that is the explosion you see

[eyesoverskies]

The science of jet fuel no matter how you look at it cannot EVER burn hot enough to do the damage claimed. even so, most of the fire went OUTSIDE the bldgs. there were PPL standing where the planes hit after the heat wave left. they were alive before they fell. Explain that. those are from actual news footage.

science and physics will not allow any of those bldgs to come down from planes and simple jet fuel alone. besides, there are over 100 eyewitnesses on LEGIT (NEWS) camera saying bombs.

[shatterblast]

at 0:04 to 0:05 you see a bomb on the right side explode below the collapsing area

[camp344]

At o:04 to 0:05 was not a bomb I also thought that but then I realized it was the pressure of the top of the building that caused the steel structure to pop and seem like an explosion but WTC 7 was a demolition now that you can see in any video of the collapse of WTC 7.

[markxxx21]

As a physics major it's obvious you have no idea about HOW the WTC was built. The WTC was not built like the Empire State Buildiing. If the planes had hit the Empire State it would've stood up.

Basically the WTC was supported by trusses. The fireproof was SPRAYED on. In the Empire State the fire proof in enclosed in many feet of cement.

The steel doesn't have to melt, just weaken.

[0in]

exactly and when the plane hit, it blew away the fire proofing

[sawzaw203]

WOW!! Did you get that right out of the gov't official story?? And you call yourself a physics major?? The towers were supported by MASSIVE steel columns at the core of the building. It would take a huge amount of energy to destroy both towers exactly the same way. And jet fuel fires DO NOT have that kind of energy!!

[TheFeastoftheBigEast]

I will never, never fully realize how many people died when this happened and the bravery of so many people, fire fighters and normal citizens together. I don't think I could ever do what they did.

[MustacheVerra]

You can clearly see the tower is exploding. This is no collapse.

[EugeneXL]

yea the weight of the 10-20 storeys are not enuf to crush down the other 90-80 storey you are right its exploding

[pobesnelizmaj]

end od america ..end of humanity... what an irony

[Cylipso1180]

so many long comments.. people think they know all about 9/11.. and they think the war is related to that.. and there talking about the war in a 9/11? your just adding more drama..

[palasta]

Oh, it will get really dramatic in a few years. Just wait...

Nono, i'm no twoofer, i'm no one special, just a beholder.

[crhood2166]

This is actually one of the more convicing conspiracy debunk videos in that it clearly collapses from the top down, and not from the bottom like a controlled demolition.

[farttalk45]

are you kidding? crhood did you not see the core still standing after the building is gone, and then the core falls symetrically straight down? that's not even possible.

[amaraca]

WAKE UP AMERICA ... WAKE UP ... And the war in Iraq is necessary for ...? What ever happened to the pit-stain, Afghanistan. Remember that one line? Classic. The world is much larger than just silly United States; we all have a responsibility to grow up.

[psikeyhackr]

How much steel was on the 80th floor of the south tower?

Windsor Tower..131 ft x .82 ft x 348 ft tall

30 flrs of WTC.205 ft x 205 ft x 360 ft tall

There had to be enough steel on the 80th floor of the south WTC to hold FOUR Windsor Towers. But we haven't heard how much steel was on every level of the buildings in SIX YEARS.

The Windsor Tower didn't collapse in 18 hours of fire so how did all that steel weaken in 56 minutes? Don't steel the TRUTH! see WTC Impact Model - MIT

[Notawesomeatall7]

I think the Windsor Tower didn't collapse in "18 hours of fire" because it was only a FIRE. The world trade tower collapse because of all of the JET FUEL. Jet fuel burns HOT and can is powerful, whereas fire generates heat JET FUEL generates IMMENSE heat.

[Twiddle88]

No, because the plane severely damaged the building and severed support columns, the fire only weakened the steel in which was already supporting more than usual. Also jet fuel is NOT hot enough to melt steel.

But you're right about one thing and that is that Madrid building was NOT hit by an airliner hit at 600 mph.

[farttalk45]

really twiddle if what you say is true, the collapse would happen after the plane hit, not an hour latter. but don't let any reason stop you from being an idiot.

[Godisfraud777]

Hey, a moron like you can't be reasoned with so why don't you just go FUCK YOURSELF!

[Twiddle88]

OMG LOL I'm so gutted by that insult. ROFL.

Keeping speaking shit you retard.

[amaraca]

The WTC Impact Model from MIT is the shit on my anus hairs. It's a bunch of lies. MIT works for the devil.

[psikeyhackr]

Jet Fuel is KEROSENE that requires OXYGEN to burn. The atmosphere is only 20% oxygen so it cannot even reach its maximum burn temperature of 1800 oF.

We still need to know the TONS of steel and TONS of concrete on every LEVEL of the building. Is PHYSICS too hard for you dudes?

It is not from MIT, it is making fun of MIT for not asking the obvious questions. All of the engineering schools are accomplices after the fact for not asking the TONS of STEEL and CONCRETE on every LEVEL.

[Falloutgirl232]

I think the ":plane" that hit the pentagon was not a plane. where were the plane pieces and if large plane hit the building wouldn't there have been a bigger hole???

NO disrespect to the people that died at the pentagon

[apocalypsynch]

So many people are afraid to go a step further and acknowledge that no planes hit the WTC. Please watch "September Clues", all parts, at livevideoDOTcom, and "911 Taboo" here. Check their claims like I have, against VHS and archive footage.

[amaraca]

You're sort of right. There were no indications of a plane hitting the Pentagon. Any retard can understand that a plane would damage the facade by it's wings. I see no wings marks/scrapes. Just one big hole, later that was crushed by sagging floors. One big hole, like a giant pussy. Gone.

[Ridgley]

I doubt there was a controlled demolition involved. All I know is that MACYS is an evil cooperation because they kept my mother at work that day. She worked at the Macys like 3 blocks away from the towers... and they kept everyone at work until 6 pm because "people needed to shop" >.> Would you shop if terrorists were attacking you down the street? I guess so! -.- Terrible terrible terrible day. I wish everyone a depressing 9-11, and god bless all those lost and their families.

[jordp07]

I saw this documentry about the twin towers last year and it said that the structure was strong enough to with-hold a plane crash?!

[Berkeley626]

Did the building free fall? Free fall from roof to ground would have been 9.2 seconds. Freeze frame at the 12 second mark, or 10 seconds after the building starts to collapse. Has it completely fallen? Not even close. How about the 17 sec mark? Finished collapsing? No, but then you can start to see a large section in the middle taller than local buildings that hasn't even started to collapse, and doesn't start until the 32 second mark!

Free fall my ass

[agentzippo]

Look at the tube like colums of smoke above the collapse wave that form briefly... what does that look like to you? oh by the way, you can figure out how big they are, and if you do, they are about the right size of the holes in the roof tops of the other wtc buildings and the hole in the street.

[agentzippo]

Actually that popular mechanics article does a horrible job of debunking. They totally ignore all the major flaws of the official story. And excuse me, actual scientists and engineers? why don't you look at DR. Judy Woods website, she has a PHD in structural engineering. But even so, when you look at the evidence, it should only take some common sense to realise that the official story is total rubbish.

[Berkeley626]

Judy Wood has no background in structural engineering. Her expertise is materials engineering - specifically the dynamics of dental materials. Real relevant. Her "billiard ball" analysis, which completely and laughably ignores the law of conservation of energy, is the laughingstock of "truther" scientific analysis

[agentzippo]

The debris pile was less than 3 stories tall yet it should be around 12 stories high, even in a controlled demolition. Add that to the fact that WTC7, a building less than half of the height of the twin towers left a debris pile much larger! The buildings were turned into dust, and even demolition explosives will not do this. I suggest you all visit w w w (dot) drjudywood (dot) com for more evidence of exotic weapons being used to destroy the world trade center.

[Sentinel4truth]

dementia, your name is fitting. I have no self esteem problems, and actually was hurt and angered in my world view when I discovered 9/11 was an inside job based on evidence, not theory. Look at this video: AT 1:45, YOU CAN SEE THE ACTUAL SHAPED CHARGES DETONATING INSIDE WTC 7 AS IT IMPLODES. This is EVIDENCE, not conjecture. Massively overengineered steel and concrete buildings do not collapse at freefall speed from fire without the use of controlled demolition. watch?v=_08VwJRP-Xc

[tylermannison]

There were no explosives you dumb mother fucker.

[Sentinel4truth]

9/11 was a covert black op, no question about it. The buildings were brought down with controlled demolition. The evidence is OVERWHELMING and incontrovertible.

9/11 = COVERT MILITARY PSY OP

[tylermannison]

don't make up lies.

[Sentinel4truth]

How can you not see that the building fell straight down with clear blast squibs several floors below it? This is EVIDENCE, and the truth is stronger than your lies.

[tylermannison]

Those squibs were the floors falling on each other.

[Sentinel4truth]

Those squibs were caused by shaped charges which were placed to intentionally bring down the buildings. NO ONE thought those towers were going to collapse, not the firefighters, not the media watching the event, no one.

This was a covert op for the purpose of: "patriot" act, invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, Dept. of Reich Security, etc.

[tylermannison]

Go fuck your self you dumb bastard.

[Sentinel4truth]

I knew you would collapse just like that building. Sleep tight, Nancy.

[ViperGuy10]

WTF, There Were NO Explosive charges In The Towers, Incase You Didn't Know, Two Planes Massive Planes Traveling at Over 500MPH Hit The Towers. The Force Of The impact and the Fires caused the WTC to Collapsed, and The squibs that you see were cause by the force of the floors falling on each other. There's No conspiracy, Get Over IT.

[Sentinel4truth]

You can try to convince yourself that there were no shaped charges that brought down the north and south towers, but there's no way you can say WTC 7, a 47 story tall skyscraper which was not hit by an airplane and collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was not a controlled demolition. It collapsed 7 hours after the north tower. It took an expert black op demo team weeks to plant and check those charges which proves they were planted well ahead of time.

[ViperGuy10]

I agree With You, I don't Know what Happened to WTC 7, What I'm saying is That The Towers Collapsed Because two massive planes hit the towers, When they hit the building they created a masssive hole in the center of the buildings, and then Gravity and the hot fires caused the unstable buildings to collapsed.

[Sentinel4truth]

Look, if WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition, then so were the twin towers. Look at the way it collapsed in this video! Floors 99-101 completely collapsed simultaneously and fell onto the 98th floor.  There's no way the cores on both buildings could have had every single support fail simultaneously without the use of controlled demolition. They both fell at freefall speed in 10 seconds! The planes were a necessary distraction.

[ViperGuy10]

Dude, When the planes hit the WTC they created a massive hole in the "CENTER" of the Building, The weight of the undamaged floors and gravity cause the Twin Towers to collapsed. Thats like if a fat guy stands on top of a structure thats missing its core, the weight of the guy pushing down on the structure will cause it to collapse. There was no CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, GET OVER IT!!!!

[Sentinel4truth]

Then how did both structures remain standing for an hour and 1 1/2 hours? Given your theory the building should have collapsed instantly after being hit. The obvious answer is they were brought down in a carefully done controlled demolition. Four planse in two hours? Where were the F16s which are able to be dispatched within minutes? Cheney issued a stand down order. This was carefully orchestrated to fool most of the people. Not me.

9/11 = COVERT MILITARY PSY OP

[Sentinel4truth]

Popular Mechanics is covering for the establishment and blatantly lying. The entire psy op is laid bare when viewing footage of WTC building 7 collapsing a few hours after the twin towers in a clear and obvious controlled demolition agreed upon by demolition experts. 99% of the public believe only two building were destroyed, they don't know of the third. If they did, everyone would know 9/11 was a covert military psy op: watch?v=_08VwJRP-Xc

[Sentinel4truth]

Virtually every TV news anchor who saw the events on 9/11 said it defies belief that the world trade center could collapse as the result of airplanes and fire. They're all right! It is literally unbelievable and the video evidence proves it. A complete disintegration can only be caused by well placed explosives as each of the towers were overengineered to withstand not just one, but multiple commercial jetliner impacts.

9/11 = COVERT MILITARY PSY OP

[baumusc]

Wrong! First the building was designed to withstand a 707 hit which is a much smaller plane than the 757. The building did withstand the collision. What it wasn't designed for was to withstand the collision plus the intense fire that was left to burn unimpeded.

[Sentinel4truth]

No, you are wrong: the fires were going out as evidenced by thick black smoke which meant the fires couldn't get oxygen. There was a radio from a firefighter who made it to the 78th floor, said that he needed two lines to knock out the couple of spot fires that were there at the impact site. There's no way massive tempered steel I beams could have been in any way compromised by the jet fuel fire. The whole story is just a rouse to cover for the operation.

9/11 = COVERT MILITARY PSY OP

[oakheadfootball]

Good view.

[pacovonjimius]

do not listen to anyone who calls you extreme, liberal or insinuates that you disrespect the country, the families who lost lives, or the military for considering an alternate theory to 9/11. look at the facts as they have been presented to you from every side and decide in your heart what is right.

[UntilDomination]

I have a simple question that may awake some people up: Is it possible after a "normal" collapse that some of the elements of the building are still standing up after the collapse has occured?? Because I clearly see some perimeter columns taller than the wt7 (We can see them right to it) standing up even if the building is down. Horizontal blast could indeed explain this. Does vertical collapse driven by gravity alone could explain this?!?!? I wonder!!

[KilltownSucks]

Those are actually Core columns, and yes it's possible. If anything, the standing core columns disproves the controlled demolition theories. Yes, a vertical collapse driven by gravity does explain this, the same occurs with the South Tower collapse.

[dudepal187]

A vertical collapse, when you apply basic physics, is physically impossible. That spire coming out of the smoke is made of concrete, and it doesnt disprove the demolition theory. It emerges from the smoke for a few seconds then it turns to dust and just falls.

[boylebongo]

Where did this video come from? I have never seen the WTC tower collapse in this manner before. It goes against every other video I've seen.

-Marvin E.

[bryankelly]

because you've probably only seen the videos the CT's want you to see, so they can brainwash you into think what they want you to think

[Ryan198416]

You people all need to re evaluate the entire morning of September 11th 2001. it is absolutly obsurd to think that this was an inside job. I am so sick and tired of hearing how "planes didnt actually hit the WTC and Pentagon". Tell that to the families who lost loved ones on those 4 fateful flights. despite thousands of pictures and videos of the 9/11 attacks, You extreme Liberal d*ckheads seem to come up with more bullshit every time you see or hear about 9/11. GET A LIFE YOU LIBERAL JERKS

[Cwuttunee]

Bush is a pussy, i think we all know that

[balthazar111111]

it is a scam i watched 1 hour and a halve of it all there were inside explotions and you saw smoke come out below where it ad got to colapses so hear hear bush sucks dick why kill that many people no point the president is a knob

[kevin12abcde]

bush can suck my harry balls.... samk10 I like you'r statement

[XtremeDeon]

fuck bush, his fault

[Samk10]

No hes right it was inside its not his fault your president is a prick who kills his own people to make an excuse to go to war in which another 3000 americans died its all on bush.

[dm6187]

9/11 was an INSIDE JOB! A CALL TO TRUE PATRIOTS!

[eddyk3]

Screw you idiot.

Respect the dead...that were killed my FOREIGN terrorists.

[rjs87]

outside job