@dg8383 Then you should have no difficulty pointing out numerous examples of science errors and screw-ups in this "kid show." Cause sorry, "morons" doenst make you look too smart either
I laugh at the people who say it was a hoax. "It was fake". Well how? Every single theory has been proved wrong, by proffessionals, on multiple occassions. Well then keyboard warriors, how is it fake? Tell me with all your knowledge.
@glarbjerg1 - They've proven the opposite :) They have shown that you cannot recreate the 1/6th gravity of the moon using wires and slow motion to the standard we see in Apollo footage. The only way they could match it was in a plane (and even then it's only possible for about 20 seconds at a time). No sci-fi film has come close to matching Apollo footage using wires and slo-mo, and no moon hoax film has bothered to try (or they have, but failed and so it was never shown ;)).
@MTMind2 I think the problem here is..they tried it once , with someone who was clearly not used to it and he could have just done it in a way to set it off, in the end you can manipulate everything and than claim that its real. I personally don't care if the moonladning was fake or not, but you can't call someone out, who believes one thing without compromise and you do the same on the other side.
@Nikagor - I think you're being rather unfair on MBs there :-) In one episode, MythBusters have done FAR more in terms of testing the hoax claims than ALL the moon hoax films put together. Moon hoax films never do this testing to prove their claims, hence they never try to recreate Apollo footage by rigging up actors with wires or using slow-mo as claimed. Doesn't that seem strange to you? Surely the best way they could prove it was faked would be for *them* to fake it and show us? :-|
@MTMind2 No that was not really my point, kudos for them for doing it, but my point is that they actually do to less.
See let me make a simply example, you see someone breakdancing and some idiot claims its impossible to do such things, he then try's it himself and fails miserable, because he is not used to the movements and his body doesn't have the strength, would you believe him, if he concludes from his try that its impossible?
@Nikagor - I know what you're saying, but that's a 'red herring' imo. If you're suggesting there are experts who could have done it perfectly, then where are these experts? The movie industry and magicians are the best when it comes to performing with wires, and yet no sci-fi film (not even the brilliant wirework of the Chinese cinema) nor any magician has achieved lower gravity to the perfection we see in many hours of unedited Apollo footage. So why would MBs have faired any better?
@Nikagor - Therefore if we take your same breakdancing analogy, the person claiming it's impossible is not the same person trying to bust that claim. Now if he claims the breakdancing was faked using certain methods, then it's for him to prove it can be faked that way, even if it means finding someone else who can do it. Likewise, moon hoax believers must prove Apollo footage can be faked perfectly with wires and slo-mo. MythBusters failed to fake it that way, but at least they tried!
@glarbjerg1 GREAT! now all you have to do is find the "studio" which every hoax retard hasnt been able to do in 40 years.
Except whoops, some hoax retards swear it was filmed OUTDOORS. If you idiots cant even agree on a consistent story amongst yourselves, theres zero reason any of us should agree with you either
@dg8383 - They tried that in part 3 and it still doesn't match the apollo footage;
/watch?v=NOv_zvM-oJQ
That's why no moon hoax film has ever shown it can be done with wires on earth (or even tried), because it doesn't match the Apollo footage. Likewise, no sci-fi film has ever recreated the moon's gravity to the standard we see in Apollo footage using wires or slow motion. Only today with CGI is there a chance of them matching it. So how could it be faked so perfectly 40+ yrs ago?
@TheKainMan No, it surely doesn't have 0 G, that would mean it doesn't even have mass, since all mass has some sort of gravitational force on other objects (yes, even your computer has gravity on you) - but I didn't say that the Moon has 0 G - I said that the plane in which Adam and Jamie tested this myth in 0,165 G (moon gravity) was CALLED "Zero-G", that's a completely different thing.
@lordchaos3819 - A TV camera was mounted on an arm on the lander which had to be deployed by the astronauts after they landed. Once mission control could see the TV images and confirm that the camera was in the right position, then Neil Armstrong could step out of the lander.
@chentingting you are an asshole.. we know that the moon has 1/6th gravity because of it's mass.. go back to the school man.. by the way, I think that anything of these exist.. we all live in the Matrix..
but doesn't this mean they actually did this on a set..lol idk i mean they showed how everything can be recreated so...yeah...idk im just confusing myself
@DamnXItsXNoe - Nah, it shows how they couldn't recreate the results on a set, the only way they were able to recreate 1/6th gravity to the quality seen in the Apollo footage was in an airplane for 20-30 seconds, as done for the interior scenes in the film Apollo 13 (for zero gravity). Hence no moon hoax film has ever rigged up an actor on wires over a dust covered stage to show how it was done, because they know their claims would fall apart the moment they tried to do it. :)
@chentingting - I hope you're kidding :) Do you have any idea how difficult it is to create a vaccum? And look at the SIZE of the area involved, an airplane is cramped for space, so how can anyone film the footage we see from Apollo (including the clip used in MBs) on an airplane? Not only that, zero g or 1/6th g can only be maintained for 20-30 seconds at a time, whereas some Apollo footage runs for over an hour! So come on, surely you can see your airplane idea is impossible :)
who cares if they did or not we are trying to find a life on another planet so when we stop trying to go back and see if they really got to the moon maybe we would find another planet.. i mean move on everyone..
@mrconradhoppe There are no stars on the moon because it's too small for even one star to be there... Oh, you meant not in the lunar sky? Well duh, the same reason why most of your vision is blocked out when a car is heading your way and still has main beam (or driving beam) on. The light reflected back from the moon itself washes away the much fainter stars.
Btw, I do hope you managed to get more educated in this year.
WHY IS ANYBODY SO ABSURD THE MYTHBUSTER PROVE THAT THE LANDING IN THE MOON IS FACT, WHY IS IT PEOPLE ALWAYS BELIEVING IN CONTROVERSIES SUCH AS ALEIN LANDINGS , WAKE UP PEOPLE THEIR ARE LOT OF PROBLEMS WE ARE FACING LIKE HUNGER PEOPLE ARE DYING SPECIALLY IN AFRICA, TERRORISM , WHY IS IT PEOPLE CARE ABOUT MYSTERIES THAN WHATS FACT
@remistaom - Astronauts during spacewalks on the ISS and (previously) the Space Shuttle, and many other space walks over the last 47 years, were/are subject to EXACTLY the same huge temperature variation as on the moon, hence if they can cope on spacewalks, then they can cope on the moon! And what about the radiation? Not a single astro-scientist believes the Apollo astronauts received a fatal dose of radiation during any mission. Apollo landed men on the moon, 6 times, live with it. ;-)
@remistaom There was no variation. The moon is cold on one side and hot on the other, So, what if they stay on just one of those sides? Or In the middle? Where the temp is between the two extremes? Maybe? You dont have to be smarter than a moonrock to figure that out.
What ABOUT radiation? A big scary word you heard on TV? Can you name a single radiologist who ever brings it up? Or just hoax newbs without one foggy clue?
See, I AM a radiologist, and whatever you read was horseshit
@SpreadingtheMuse The Moon is tidally locked with the Earth and since the Earth rotates, so does the Moon. So there actually are lunar days and nights. The temperature ranges from 120 degrees K (-243.67 degrees Fahrenheit) to 380 degrees K (224.33 degrees Fahrenheit).
(next part directed at hoax nuts)
However, do you notice how when the sun only just peaks over the horizon in the morning how it's already 86F!?
I'll tell you; No! Because it doesn't work like that!
The moon does rotate as you said. My point was that the twilight area between the two extremes stays in a moderate temp for days at a time, precisely because the moon does rotate so slow.
My only complaint here is that Adam didn't have an antenna on his own backpack; this will make the astronauts' antennas look slightly suspicious to the sceptics.
@Renewal7 - That flight is used for simulating zero gravity too, hence the point they're upside down is not 1/6th earth's gravity, it's not the moon's gravity, it's nearly to zero gravity (as on the space station). Hence the footage they compare to the Apollo footage is at the point when moments the flight is simulating 1/6th gravity, i.e. 5:46 - 6:01, 6:08-6:28 and 6:35-6:47.
OK. I can understand that this is a show first and anything else later, but I would not expect much fooling around like this. Like that part, where they reproduced NASA photo using a studio light in atmospheric conditions, one would expect anything but similar outcome compared to those taken on Moon. What I would really like to see, is a human body response to ~500° F temperature fluctuations and how these suits compensate and switch from cooling to heating in a fraction of a second.
@Renewal7 - Correct, it's a show first, it's there to entertain, so I see no problem with any 'fooling around'. There's nothing in that MBs show that TV studios around the world couldn't try for themselves, in fact, it's interesting that NO moon hoax film has ever attempted such experiments before or since! As for temperature, astronauts during spacewalks are subject to exactly the *same* range of temperatures as on the moon, and this has been happening since before the moon landings to today.
@Renewal7 Though it is true that the *total* temperature fluctuation is 260 degrees K/C (or almost 500F), however, do you notice how, in the mornings, when the sun only just peaks over the horizon, the temperature shoots up 30 degrees (K/C or 86F) in an instant? No, because it doesn't work like that.
They planned the trips to the moon so that the temperatures wouldn't be colder or hotter than their suits could protect them from.
@wetbivybag - So state what did they did wrong in their experiments? What did they do that TV studios all over the world and hoax film makers couldn't have done in the 3 years since that program was first broadcast? NASA's involvement is irrelevent, MBs state how their experiments were done, they show their experiments being done and how it busts the hoax claims. Why hasn't anyone done those experiments to prove MBs wrong and hence counter the evidence provided? Don't just talk the talk... :)
@MTMind2 I love Myth Busters. But this is the first time I've ever seen them go so over the top to discredit people who believe the landing were staged. The fact that most of the equipment were provided by NASA makes it biased. It really felt like NASA had approached them and got their help to disprove the conspiracy theories. It still doesn't change the fact that nobody has ever succeeded in passing the Van Allen Radiation Belt. The furthest NASA can get a manned ship is 360 miles from earth.
Actually the Shuttles maximum operational altitude is 600 miles. And the reason for that is fuel and re-entry stresses.
A capsule due to it's shape can re-enter at much higher speeds and so can reach far higher altitudes... like Gemini 11 for example which reached an altitude of 850 miles.
And even the Russians have succeeded in passing through the VABs... They sent two dogs through the inner VAB in Kosmos 110.
@ytmoog So you're admitting that the maximun height is 600 miles. It's 62000 miles to the moon! There is no possible way they could have even got close. Not even with the technology we have now.
@wetbivybag Because of fuel and constraints on thermal loading during re-entry, among other things. No one ever said the Space Shuttle could go to the moon.
@wetbivybag - Obviously you didn't read my replies, it is NOT 62000 miles to the moon (so please stop saying that), it's an average of around 239,000 miles away (where did you get your figure of 62000 miles from? It would have taken you only 10 seconds to find the correct distance on the internet!). Hence I'll ask you again, state exactly what you believe is wrong in any of those MB's experiments. Btw, what makes you think the Van Allen belts are some kind of impenetrable field of death?
@MTMind2 Yeah, sorry about the distance. Don't know where I go that. Still 239,000 miles makes it even more unlikely someone actually got to the moon.
@wetbivybag what does 239,000 miles have to do with anything? So how far is too far? Give me a number and justify it. Why is 239,000 too far but 100,000 isnt? You cant just pull a number out of your rear.
If ANYTHING was wrong with the landing, we would have heard it from actual engineers 40 years ago, not 4 decades too late from scientific illiterates who've never worked a technical job a day in their life.
@SpreadingtheMuse Indeed, and it's laughable idiocy. If 36,000,000 miles isn't too far for a number of endearing space study organizations, how can a tiny hop of 239,000 be?
The maximum height of the shuttle is 600, due to fuel and re-entry stresses. (Note the very large and heavy wings)
It was designed to carry cargo to low earth orbit that is all.
A capsule such as Gemini or Apollo due to it's shape can re-enter at much much higher speeds, and because they are far lighter than the shuttle require far less fuel to reach higher orbits.
@wetbivybag You do realize that the ISS passes through the VAB twice a day right?
Or to quote Dr. Van Allen (who discovered, studied and got the belts named after) himself about the moon being hoaxed because of the VABs "Utter nonsense" (He's referring to "Did We Land on the Moon?" which claims the same thing).
Actually the inner VAB touches the atmosphere in places so a 260 mile orbit will result in the ISS passing through the VAB a lot.
But a better example would be the Soviet mission Kosmos 110 which carried 2 dogs repeatedly through the Inner VAB for 22 days... both returning unharmed.
@wetbivybag Being European I use kilometres, deal with it.
The ISS' orbit apogee is at just under 400km (as of 1 October 2011), the inner belt starts around 100km.
To expand on this, satellites with a mere 3mm shielding will receive 2500 rem on an entire year. Granted that 1000+ rem is a pretty sure way to get yourself killed, but the astronauts weren't out there, in the belt, for a whole year.
@wetbivybag Being European I use kilometres, deal with it.
The ISS' orbit apogee is at just under 400km (as of 1 October 2011), the inner belt starts around 100km.
To expand on this, satellites with a mere 3mm shielding will receive 2500 rem on an entire year. Granted that 1000+ rem is a pretty sure way to get yourself killed, but the astronauts weren't out there, in the belt, for a whole year.
@MTMind2 So the furthest they can get now is just over 300 miles yet they went 62000 miles to the moon in the sixties. It just way too much to believe. The evidence to prove they didn't go to the moon far outways the evidence proving they did. Just look at it with an open mind.
@wetbivybag - The moon is (on average) about 239,000 miles away, so please get the details correct :)
In 1960 (51 years ago), 2 divers reached the lowest known point in the earth's ocean, and yet we haven't been back since, I guess you think that was faked then. We used to fly from London to New York at supersonic speeds, but we can't do that anymore, I guess you consider Concorde to be fake then :)
Also, absolutely no moon hoax claim holds up to scrutiny, none of them, zero, zilch...etc.
@wetbivybag - So going back to what I'd said, that episode of MythBusters was first aired 3 YEARS ago, more than enough time for others to carry out the same experiments to prove them wrong. So why haven't they? Why haven't you stated EXACTLY what you think they did wrong in any experiment? Hence saying NASA's equipment makes it biased is just an excuse. Apollo passed through the Van Allen belts there and back, those are the facts, just saying it didn't happen doesn't mean it didn't happen :)
@XiaoGia96 I would believe the account of thousands of witnesses, scientists, engineers and academics, over some kooks who just make shit up about aliens, frankly.
I believe we went to the moon. It doesnt mean that all conspiracy theories are crazy. Just because the truth is something other than what the majority believe dosent mean it didnt happen.
@lpslostagain Right, you don't watch TV anymore ... but you apparently do still watch YouTube. And you apparently are still suckered into it enough to comment. So ... is that really any better than watching TV, according to your own standards?
Satellite images will provide you proof of the flag that still stands on the moon. Oh, you don't trust satellite imagery? Try a telescope then. Oh, they might have put a lens on your telescope to lie to you?
@lpslostagain What are you pretending to know about the radiation belt? Do you know anything about it? What kind of radiation is in it? How much Dose is in it? How much dose is fatal to humans? Dont just cut and paste big words, prove you know what you're talking about.
prove this /watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM moon landing was fake IMO , and why have we never went back? what about the radiation belt? do you really think a TV SHOW will tell you the truth? they dont even go in it open minded, they all ready think it was real. it kinda makes me sick, its like, we landed and we will prove it, not , we dont know, we will find out. no wonder i dont watch tv no more
prove this /watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM moon landing was fake IMO , and why have we never went back? what about the radiation belt? do you really think a TV SHOW will tell you the truth? they dont even go in it open minded, they all ready think it was real.
Your a moron, do the world a favour, stop commenting on things you have no expertise in and fucking kill yourself!! Im British, I have no reason to lie. YOU LANDED ON THE MOON YOU MORON!!! Ask ANYONE outside of the USA who has no reason to lie to the American Public...YOU LANDED ON THE MOON YOU MORON!! The only people that think you didnt land on the moon, are cretins like you who know NOTHING OF THE FACTS! IDIOT!! FUCKTARD!!! GO GET A DARWIN AWARD FOR FUCKS SAKE!!
It's true that the flag can flap on the moon if it is set to motion.
But There are sequences in which the flag starts in motion without having been visibly shaken by the astronaut, and stops quite fast to flap without having been stopped by the astronaut, and this is abnormal.
@hunchbacked - I believe you're referring to a video where the flag seems to move after the astronaut walked passed. The problem with that video is that we cannot see between the astronaut and the flag, so we can't prove the astronaut didn't touch it. Regardless, it continues to swing for about 30 seconds, which wouldn't happen in earth's atmosphere. As for your claims about the flag in other sequences, I don't believe that's true, so I'll watch any videos you provide as proof with interest ;-)
In what concerns the video in Apollo 15 in which an astronaut passes by and the flag flaps slightly, we can be sure he was not close to the extremity of the flag because he is consistently taller than the extremity of the flag, which would not have been the case if he had touched it.
@hunchbacked - That's been argued over for years, with some even producing 3D computer models to show that he could have touched the flag with his arm/hand, some producing 3D models to show that he just misses the flag, theories about static on the nylon flag attracting it towards the astronaut, and yes, theories about wind too. But whatever those theories and opinions are, what we do know is that the flag swings, and does so about 30 seconds, hence shows no signs of any air resistance at all :)
@hunchbacked - And I think I seen all the flag flagging movies and had discussions on many of them, and yet I do not recall any video of the flag moving as you claim. In all the flag moving videos I've seen, with the exception of the the flag moving when that astronaut passes by, an astronaut is seen manipulating the flag pole, hence the reason for the flagging in 1/6th gravity and no air. Hence I look forward to your videos.
@hunchbacked - Sorry, silly typos, it should be "I've" not "I" and "flapping" not "flagging". But I'm tired, it's late, so in fact I'm the one who's "flagging", therefore I'm off to get some sleep now :-) ............
@bacchonysus They didn't, it just appears to be like that because of the lack of wind resistance. Just before 1:32 notice how Tory's expression changes. Now imagine that happening at a faster speed. Say, twice the speed as hoaxers insists. His face would be torn off or something.
Waht is really interesting was the fact that in my story, some astronauts actually fasted prior to launch as they became pilgrims. What a blessing it is to be part of a religion that harmonizes scientific fact with truthful prophecy.
Respond to this video... Part of such truthfulness is the fact that it is impossible to hide your sins, so don't try it. Ultimate proof of such includes the fact that life becomes less fair once people stop becoming fair and just themselves.
@avatarmingtien If you believe this episode of Mythbusters, when they are making points with errors, and was obviously inspired by NASA themselves, I am sure you believed the questionable footage and claims from the 60's already.
@deathknight228 What is questionable about it? I want to hear some real facts...We have so much evidence that even if we took hoaxters to the moon themselves they would claim the porthole was a tv screen...lol
Well actually you have the right to believe anything you want about this, just be open-minded enough to be able to accept explanations like the ones in this episode.
lol. They shouldn't have had to test the flag. Newtons law of motion, if something is moving it will stay moving until stopped by an opposing force. In a vacuum there would be less force acting on the flag, thus any momentum gained from twisting would continue for a longer time.
You can also leave fairly distinct footprints in dust. A house that hasn't been lived in for a while for instance, easy to tell the size, shape and even make of the shoes when they've stepped in.
@ero74178953 Wow, I see not only one rope but 2! Strange how they both just appeared directly over the astronauts suits... Just when I was like forget the conspiracy we did land on the moon, I had to read your comment!... What are the chances of those strings just flashing above each of them... Damn... Someone explain that please!
@Smoove808 - If those were ropes/wires, what are the chances of both flashing at EXACTLY the same time and for the same duration? You probably didn't spot it but, what are the chances of two dots of the same colour flashing for about the same duration in perfect alignment with those lines 3 seconds BEFORE the astronauts were in that position (6:24)?
Those are simply artifacts, which I go into detail here :);
What concerns me most is that conspiracy theorists obviously view most other people as spineless liars - especially us scientists. Not only is that an incredibly dystopian and misanthrope view of the world, it is also insulting!
how do they no how much weight the astronauts had on them? Ive also seen plenty of footage of the flag fluttering on its own. Clearly the Myth busters were paid. ONE SIMPLE FACT IS!!...when they "landed" on the moon, there is absolutely NO crater created from the thrust of the spaceship. Whoever believes the moon landing is legit is an idiot.
@batocccc oh man...No crater should be expected. The Descent Propulsion System was throttled very far down during the final landing. The Moon lander was no longer quickly decelerating, so the descent engine only had to support the lander's own weight, which was lessened by the Moon's gravity and by the near exhaustion of the descent propellants..god damnit and if you did not infact go to the moon how there are retroflecters?
@batocccc I would like to see that footage of the flag waving itself because i've seen plenty of apollo footage and never seen the flag waving itself, except after they were positioning it and that its infact possible and logical. THE SIMPLE FACT is that every question hoax believers ask CAN BE and ARE already answered with scientific and logical arguments, arguments that no hoax believers have to support their theories.
@batocccc and also a fact is that an astronaut in one of the apollo missions did an experiment. dropping a hammer and a falcon feather at the same time, on the earth it is impossible that they fall at the same rate and hit the groung at the same time, and what happeneded on the moon is that both fell at the same rate and hit the ground at the same time, and THAT is impossible on earth even in the MOVIES.
hey mythbusters it's better you to test the van allen belt, in how you can pass there with thin aluminum body of apollo craft safe and alive...please we want to know..please!!! and please!!!
hey at 9:42 see the flag is not flapping but seems like it freeze whilst the astronouts moving...how much did they government paid to these mysthbustes?
its funny about the flag myth in the first place because everything thats on the moon is totally different than on earth like come on seriosly gravity is less there is no wind thats true but there is less gravity come on people we learned this a long time ago.
A robot probe MIGHT have put reflectors there, but then the question becomes:::
WHAT robot probe? A probe built with blueprints you dont have? Written by engineers you cant name? Launched on a date you dont know in a rocket no one saw? Those probes?
And you see the problem. Any hoax pusher who tries this is making the newb mistake of explaining conspiracy A by inventing conspiracy B. You cant make up your story as you go.
@SpreadingtheMuse I see your point. Counter-theories exist in the presence of ambiguity, and there isn't much that occurs without gray areas. Every proposed government conspiracy is in regards to a largely trivial matter, in the sense of an average American's day-to-day livelihood, anyway.
LOOK AT THE MOON DUST BEING PUSHED OUT BY THE ASTRONAUTS WHEN JUMPING. IT MOVES PRETTY FAST. IF THIS WAS SLOW-MO'D, YOU'D HAVE A MUCH SLOWER DIRT MOVEMENT.
I don't understand why the hoaxers fight this event so hysterically - do they even WANT the moon landings to be true in the first place?
It seems like they hate the whole thing and feel miserable everytime they get their hoax theoriest debunked.
BE PROUD of this historic event instead ffs, there's absolutely no reason NOT to be! If you have questions, just ask them to a physicist or anyone who's somewhat knowledgeable and ACCEPT the answers you get.
@TieFreaty Im not a conspiracy theorist, but you, sir, are retarded. if the myth was approved do you really think they'd let them show it on fucking television??
@channesw Calm down man, talking shit over the internet doesnt make you cool, it just makes you a person who is too scared to talk to someone man to man, I honestly bet you havent said half of the stuff you tell people on the internet as to what you say too people in real life. Now quit being a troll and get outside, do something with your life, because replying to my comment that had nothing wrong with it, just makes it seem like you like to complain... K bye.
@channesw Since I could really care less for what you have to say whatever you send me is just gonna be deleted. My comment had nothing wrong with it, and I dont even see why you replied to it with such anger in the first place... So please, get a friend.
@TieFreaty "Since I could really care less for what you have to say whatever you send me is just gonna be deleted. My comment had nothing wrong with it"
This is what wise men call arrogance.
Maybe you ought to open your ears instead of just blocking them, shouting "shut up! shut up! shut up!".
Sorry but the Mythbuster guys are just morons. I mean look at their faces. This is not science they doing it's a show for kids
dg8383 4 days ago
@dg8383 Then you should have no difficulty pointing out numerous examples of science errors and screw-ups in this "kid show." Cause sorry, "morons" doenst make you look too smart either
SpreadingtheMuse 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
disclose.tv/forum/excellent-new-moon-landing-hoax-documentary-t35478.html
deadrekon10 5 days ago
LOL this show is like lying all over again...
branclooster 1 week ago in playlist Mythbusters: Moon Landing Isn't A Hoax
This has been flagged as spam show
I laugh at the people who say it was a hoax. "It was fake". Well how? Every single theory has been proved wrong, by proffessionals, on multiple occassions. Well then keyboard warriors, how is it fake? Tell me with all your knowledge.
freedomjustice1995 1 week ago
looool! Think about it guys.... they just prove you can do it all in Studio!
glarbjerg1 1 week ago
@glarbjerg1 - They've proven the opposite :) They have shown that you cannot recreate the 1/6th gravity of the moon using wires and slow motion to the standard we see in Apollo footage. The only way they could match it was in a plane (and even then it's only possible for about 20 seconds at a time). No sci-fi film has come close to matching Apollo footage using wires and slo-mo, and no moon hoax film has bothered to try (or they have, but failed and so it was never shown ;)).
MTMind2 1 week ago
@MTMind2 I think the problem here is..they tried it once , with someone who was clearly not used to it and he could have just done it in a way to set it off, in the end you can manipulate everything and than claim that its real. I personally don't care if the moonladning was fake or not, but you can't call someone out, who believes one thing without compromise and you do the same on the other side.
Nikagor 1 week ago
@Nikagor - I think you're being rather unfair on MBs there :-) In one episode, MythBusters have done FAR more in terms of testing the hoax claims than ALL the moon hoax films put together. Moon hoax films never do this testing to prove their claims, hence they never try to recreate Apollo footage by rigging up actors with wires or using slow-mo as claimed. Doesn't that seem strange to you? Surely the best way they could prove it was faked would be for *them* to fake it and show us? :-|
MTMind2 1 week ago
@MTMind2 No that was not really my point, kudos for them for doing it, but my point is that they actually do to less.
See let me make a simply example, you see someone breakdancing and some idiot claims its impossible to do such things, he then try's it himself and fails miserable, because he is not used to the movements and his body doesn't have the strength, would you believe him, if he concludes from his try that its impossible?
Nikagor 1 week ago
@Nikagor - I know what you're saying, but that's a 'red herring' imo. If you're suggesting there are experts who could have done it perfectly, then where are these experts? The movie industry and magicians are the best when it comes to performing with wires, and yet no sci-fi film (not even the brilliant wirework of the Chinese cinema) nor any magician has achieved lower gravity to the perfection we see in many hours of unedited Apollo footage. So why would MBs have faired any better?
MTMind2 1 week ago
@Nikagor - Therefore if we take your same breakdancing analogy, the person claiming it's impossible is not the same person trying to bust that claim. Now if he claims the breakdancing was faked using certain methods, then it's for him to prove it can be faked that way, even if it means finding someone else who can do it. Likewise, moon hoax believers must prove Apollo footage can be faked perfectly with wires and slo-mo. MythBusters failed to fake it that way, but at least they tried!
MTMind2 1 week ago
@glarbjerg1 GREAT! now all you have to do is find the "studio" which every hoax retard hasnt been able to do in 40 years.
Except whoops, some hoax retards swear it was filmed OUTDOORS. If you idiots cant even agree on a consistent story amongst yourselves, theres zero reason any of us should agree with you either
SpreadingtheMuse 1 week ago 7
@SpreadingtheMuse
Even the location is subject to change, from Area 51 to Hawaii lava fields to Lanzarote Island.
loperspest 5 days ago
Lol the gravity test is so useless and prooves nothing .Jump with wires on a descent and you get the same result as moon.
Busted my ass
dg8383 2 weeks ago
@dg8383 - They tried that in part 3 and it still doesn't match the apollo footage;
/watch?v=NOv_zvM-oJQ
That's why no moon hoax film has ever shown it can be done with wires on earth (or even tried), because it doesn't match the Apollo footage. Likewise, no sci-fi film has ever recreated the moon's gravity to the standard we see in Apollo footage using wires or slow motion. Only today with CGI is there a chance of them matching it. So how could it be faked so perfectly 40+ yrs ago?
MTMind2 2 weeks ago
180 lbs ( 82 Kg ) - weight carried by an astronaut
stupidboy15995 2 weeks ago
"It looked pretty convincing"?
lol, no actually it didn't, at least not compared to the Zero-G movements.
Laurelindo 4 weeks ago
@Laurelindo The Moon doesn't have 0 Gs.
There, I fixed your stupid, you're welcome!
TheKainMan 3 weeks ago
@TheKainMan No, it surely doesn't have 0 G, that would mean it doesn't even have mass, since all mass has some sort of gravitational force on other objects (yes, even your computer has gravity on you) - but I didn't say that the Moon has 0 G - I said that the plane in which Adam and Jamie tested this myth in 0,165 G (moon gravity) was CALLED "Zero-G", that's a completely different thing.
Laurelindo 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 4 weeks ago
Who was the guy who recorded the first steps? He would be the first man on the moon.
lordchaos3819 1 month ago
@lordchaos3819 - A TV camera was mounted on an arm on the lander which had to be deployed by the astronauts after they landed. Once mission control could see the TV images and confirm that the camera was in the right position, then Neil Armstrong could step out of the lander.
MTMind2 1 month ago
@lordchaos3819 It was filmed with a camera that was attached to the outside of the LEM
HighQualityCovers 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
chentingting 1 month ago
@chentingting you are an asshole.. we know that the moon has 1/6th gravity because of it's mass.. go back to the school man.. by the way, I think that anything of these exist.. we all live in the Matrix..
DreadfullMind 1 month ago
Comment removed
chentingting 1 month ago
but doesn't this mean they actually did this on a set..lol idk i mean they showed how everything can be recreated so...yeah...idk im just confusing myself
DamnXItsXNoe 1 month ago
@DamnXItsXNoe - Nah, it shows how they couldn't recreate the results on a set, the only way they were able to recreate 1/6th gravity to the quality seen in the Apollo footage was in an airplane for 20-30 seconds, as done for the interior scenes in the film Apollo 13 (for zero gravity). Hence no moon hoax film has ever rigged up an actor on wires over a dust covered stage to show how it was done, because they know their claims would fall apart the moment they tried to do it. :)
MTMind2 1 month ago
Comment removed
chentingting 1 month ago
@chentingting - I hope you're kidding :) Do you have any idea how difficult it is to create a vaccum? And look at the SIZE of the area involved, an airplane is cramped for space, so how can anyone film the footage we see from Apollo (including the clip used in MBs) on an airplane? Not only that, zero g or 1/6th g can only be maintained for 20-30 seconds at a time, whereas some Apollo footage runs for over an hour! So come on, surely you can see your airplane idea is impossible :)
MTMind2 1 month ago 18
who cares if they did or not we are trying to find a life on another planet so when we stop trying to go back and see if they really got to the moon maybe we would find another planet.. i mean move on everyone..
GloomY1HaveN 1 month ago
I knew it it the landing was filmed on a parabolic flight!
nagfulmar 1 month ago
4:47 Jamie :)
80sMeavyHetal 1 month ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 1 month ago
Comment removed
Laurelindo 1 month ago
@pivetom Except the trajectory was much more horizontal than vertical. The difference between low-g and high-g.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
@Reid52 And 'air' is a fluid. The 'flag' is a solid surface. They were sliding against each other causing resistance.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
@mrconradhoppe There are no stars on the moon because it's too small for even one star to be there... Oh, you meant not in the lunar sky? Well duh, the same reason why most of your vision is blocked out when a car is heading your way and still has main beam (or driving beam) on. The light reflected back from the moon itself washes away the much fainter stars.
Btw, I do hope you managed to get more educated in this year.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
WHY IS ANYBODY SO ABSURD THE MYTHBUSTER PROVE THAT THE LANDING IN THE MOON IS FACT, WHY IS IT PEOPLE ALWAYS BELIEVING IN CONTROVERSIES SUCH AS ALEIN LANDINGS , WAKE UP PEOPLE THEIR ARE LOT OF PROBLEMS WE ARE FACING LIKE HUNGER PEOPLE ARE DYING SPECIALLY IN AFRICA, TERRORISM , WHY IS IT PEOPLE CARE ABOUT MYSTERIES THAN WHATS FACT
MrRavege 1 month ago
newton laws duh
WhatDehFish 2 months ago
47 people are ignorant
H0w2doStuff 2 months ago
Ok now how about doing an episode on 9/11 and how the buildings collapsed
TheRacoon001 2 months ago
@TheRacoon001 Popular Mechanics did a two hour special on the History Channel about all the 911 stupidity. Its here on youtube somewhere.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Thanks! I'll look it up =)
TheRacoon001 2 months ago
Thats shit! What about the huge temperature variation?
Not to mention the radiation...
Moon landing is a hoax, live with it!
remistaom 2 months ago
@remistaom - Astronauts during spacewalks on the ISS and (previously) the Space Shuttle, and many other space walks over the last 47 years, were/are subject to EXACTLY the same huge temperature variation as on the moon, hence if they can cope on spacewalks, then they can cope on the moon! And what about the radiation? Not a single astro-scientist believes the Apollo astronauts received a fatal dose of radiation during any mission. Apollo landed men on the moon, 6 times, live with it. ;-)
MTMind2 2 months ago
@remistaom There was no variation. The moon is cold on one side and hot on the other, So, what if they stay on just one of those sides? Or In the middle? Where the temp is between the two extremes? Maybe? You dont have to be smarter than a moonrock to figure that out.
What ABOUT radiation? A big scary word you heard on TV? Can you name a single radiologist who ever brings it up? Or just hoax newbs without one foggy clue?
See, I AM a radiologist, and whatever you read was horseshit
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse The Moon is tidally locked with the Earth and since the Earth rotates, so does the Moon. So there actually are lunar days and nights. The temperature ranges from 120 degrees K (-243.67 degrees Fahrenheit) to 380 degrees K (224.33 degrees Fahrenheit).
(next part directed at hoax nuts)
However, do you notice how when the sun only just peaks over the horizon in the morning how it's already 86F!?
I'll tell you; No! Because it doesn't work like that!
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
@tiaxanderson
The moon does rotate as you said. My point was that the twilight area between the two extremes stays in a moderate temp for days at a time, precisely because the moon does rotate so slow.
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Oh, then I misunderstood. You are indeed correct on that point.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
That sexy female Mythbuster (Cary?) looks like Regina from Dino Crises 2! Hot.
4thcoming 2 months ago
My only complaint here is that Adam didn't have an antenna on his own backpack; this will make the astronauts' antennas look slightly suspicious to the sceptics.
Adam should've pointed that out.
Laurelindo 2 months ago
I must have missed something. Which one of the Apollo astronauts was able to float around or do any of the acrobatics shown here?
Renewal7 2 months ago
@Renewal7 - I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean you haven't seen videos like this;
Or this; /watch?v=HY-Vxj4YwSY
Or this; /watch?v=ZjOnsbodCus
Or this; /watch?v=CyOt6RUs9mE
Or this; /watch?v=7ciStUEZK-Y
Etc... :)
MTMind2 2 months ago
@MTMind2
No, not the bunny hopping or kneeling. More like floating upside down and gymnastics
Renewal7 2 months ago
@Renewal7 - That flight is used for simulating zero gravity too, hence the point they're upside down is not 1/6th earth's gravity, it's not the moon's gravity, it's nearly to zero gravity (as on the space station). Hence the footage they compare to the Apollo footage is at the point when moments the flight is simulating 1/6th gravity, i.e. 5:46 - 6:01, 6:08-6:28 and 6:35-6:47.
MTMind2 2 months ago
@MTMind2
OK. I can understand that this is a show first and anything else later, but I would not expect much fooling around like this. Like that part, where they reproduced NASA photo using a studio light in atmospheric conditions, one would expect anything but similar outcome compared to those taken on Moon. What I would really like to see, is a human body response to ~500° F temperature fluctuations and how these suits compensate and switch from cooling to heating in a fraction of a second.
Renewal7 2 months ago
@Renewal7 - Correct, it's a show first, it's there to entertain, so I see no problem with any 'fooling around'. There's nothing in that MBs show that TV studios around the world couldn't try for themselves, in fact, it's interesting that NO moon hoax film has ever attempted such experiments before or since! As for temperature, astronauts during spacewalks are subject to exactly the *same* range of temperatures as on the moon, and this has been happening since before the moon landings to today.
MTMind2 2 months ago
@Renewal7 Though it is true that the *total* temperature fluctuation is 260 degrees K/C (or almost 500F), however, do you notice how, in the mornings, when the sun only just peaks over the horizon, the temperature shoots up 30 degrees (K/C or 86F) in an instant? No, because it doesn't work like that.
They planned the trips to the moon so that the temperatures wouldn't be colder or hotter than their suits could protect them from.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
THEY SEEMED TO MISS OUT THE "THANKS TO OUR KIND SPONSORS - NASA" AT THE END OF THE PROGRAMME. WHAT A LOAD OF BIAS SHITE!!!!!
wetbivybag 2 months ago
@wetbivybag - So state what did they did wrong in their experiments? What did they do that TV studios all over the world and hoax film makers couldn't have done in the 3 years since that program was first broadcast? NASA's involvement is irrelevent, MBs state how their experiments were done, they show their experiments being done and how it busts the hoax claims. Why hasn't anyone done those experiments to prove MBs wrong and hence counter the evidence provided? Don't just talk the talk... :)
MTMind2 2 months ago
@MTMind2 they faked the tests lol
ikmagic123 2 months ago
@MTMind2 I love Myth Busters. But this is the first time I've ever seen them go so over the top to discredit people who believe the landing were staged. The fact that most of the equipment were provided by NASA makes it biased. It really felt like NASA had approached them and got their help to disprove the conspiracy theories. It still doesn't change the fact that nobody has ever succeeded in passing the Van Allen Radiation Belt. The furthest NASA can get a manned ship is 360 miles from earth.
wetbivybag 2 months ago
@wetbivybag
Actually the Shuttles maximum operational altitude is 600 miles. And the reason for that is fuel and re-entry stresses.
A capsule due to it's shape can re-enter at much higher speeds and so can reach far higher altitudes... like Gemini 11 for example which reached an altitude of 850 miles.
And even the Russians have succeeded in passing through the VABs... They sent two dogs through the inner VAB in Kosmos 110.
ytmoog 2 months ago
@ytmoog So you're admitting that the maximun height is 600 miles. It's 62000 miles to the moon! There is no possible way they could have even got close. Not even with the technology we have now.
wetbivybag 2 months ago
@wetbivybag Because of fuel and constraints on thermal loading during re-entry, among other things. No one ever said the Space Shuttle could go to the moon.
loperspest 2 months ago
@wetbivybag - Obviously you didn't read my replies, it is NOT 62000 miles to the moon (so please stop saying that), it's an average of around 239,000 miles away (where did you get your figure of 62000 miles from? It would have taken you only 10 seconds to find the correct distance on the internet!). Hence I'll ask you again, state exactly what you believe is wrong in any of those MB's experiments. Btw, what makes you think the Van Allen belts are some kind of impenetrable field of death?
MTMind2 2 months ago
@MTMind2 Yeah, sorry about the distance. Don't know where I go that. Still 239,000 miles makes it even more unlikely someone actually got to the moon.
wetbivybag 1 month ago
@wetbivybag what does 239,000 miles have to do with anything? So how far is too far? Give me a number and justify it. Why is 239,000 too far but 100,000 isnt? You cant just pull a number out of your rear.
If ANYTHING was wrong with the landing, we would have heard it from actual engineers 40 years ago, not 4 decades too late from scientific illiterates who've never worked a technical job a day in their life.
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Indeed, and it's laughable idiocy. If 36,000,000 miles isn't too far for a number of endearing space study organizations, how can a tiny hop of 239,000 be?
Kanakotka 1 month ago
@wetbivybag
Do try to read.
The maximum height of the shuttle is 600, due to fuel and re-entry stresses. (Note the very large and heavy wings)
It was designed to carry cargo to low earth orbit that is all.
A capsule such as Gemini or Apollo due to it's shape can re-enter at much much higher speeds, and because they are far lighter than the shuttle require far less fuel to reach higher orbits.
It is nothing to do with the Van Allen belts.
"It's 62000 miles to the moon!"
Fail.
ytmoog 2 months ago
@ytmoog I don't believe the got to the moon and did the other things not because it's easy but because it is hard.
wetbivybag 1 month ago
@wetbivybag
Arguments from personal incredulity are worthless.
ytmoog 1 month ago
@wetbivybag You do realize that the ISS passes through the VAB twice a day right?
Or to quote Dr. Van Allen (who discovered, studied and got the belts named after) himself about the moon being hoaxed because of the VABs "Utter nonsense" (He's referring to "Did We Land on the Moon?" which claims the same thing).
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
@tiaxanderson The ISS orbits at 260 miles. No where near the belt.
wetbivybag 1 month ago
@wetbivybag
Actually the inner VAB touches the atmosphere in places so a 260 mile orbit will result in the ISS passing through the VAB a lot.
But a better example would be the Soviet mission Kosmos 110 which carried 2 dogs repeatedly through the Inner VAB for 22 days... both returning unharmed.
ytmoog 1 month ago
@wetbivybag Being European I use kilometres, deal with it.
The ISS' orbit apogee is at just under 400km (as of 1 October 2011), the inner belt starts around 100km.
To expand on this, satellites with a mere 3mm shielding will receive 2500 rem on an entire year. Granted that 1000+ rem is a pretty sure way to get yourself killed, but the astronauts weren't out there, in the belt, for a whole year.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wetbivybag Being European I use kilometres, deal with it.
The ISS' orbit apogee is at just under 400km (as of 1 October 2011), the inner belt starts around 100km.
To expand on this, satellites with a mere 3mm shielding will receive 2500 rem on an entire year. Granted that 1000+ rem is a pretty sure way to get yourself killed, but the astronauts weren't out there, in the belt, for a whole year.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
@MTMind2 So the furthest they can get now is just over 300 miles yet they went 62000 miles to the moon in the sixties. It just way too much to believe. The evidence to prove they didn't go to the moon far outways the evidence proving they did. Just look at it with an open mind.
wetbivybag 2 months ago
@wetbivybag - The moon is (on average) about 239,000 miles away, so please get the details correct :)
In 1960 (51 years ago), 2 divers reached the lowest known point in the earth's ocean, and yet we haven't been back since, I guess you think that was faked then. We used to fly from London to New York at supersonic speeds, but we can't do that anymore, I guess you consider Concorde to be fake then :)
Also, absolutely no moon hoax claim holds up to scrutiny, none of them, zero, zilch...etc.
MTMind2 2 months ago 21
@wetbivybag - So going back to what I'd said, that episode of MythBusters was first aired 3 YEARS ago, more than enough time for others to carry out the same experiments to prove them wrong. So why haven't they? Why haven't you stated EXACTLY what you think they did wrong in any experiment? Hence saying NASA's equipment makes it biased is just an excuse. Apollo passed through the Van Allen belts there and back, those are the facts, just saying it didn't happen doesn't mean it didn't happen :)
MTMind2 2 months ago
They say that they saw civilization on the moon so they faked the whole thing, you know, illuminati shit, im 50/50 now, idk what to believe LOl
XiaoGia96 2 months ago
@XiaoGia96 I would believe the account of thousands of witnesses, scientists, engineers and academics, over some kooks who just make shit up about aliens, frankly.
krisdevalle 2 months ago
the slowed the film down on mythbusters too... lol jk
Jsoldier22 2 months ago
The comments are hurting my brain. I'm just going to watch the video now.
JedininjaZC 3 months ago 12
I believe we went to the moon. It doesnt mean that all conspiracy theories are crazy. Just because the truth is something other than what the majority believe dosent mean it didnt happen.
sean82896 3 months ago
what more can they prove to you stupid ass conspiracy theorists?
InfectedInHD 3 months ago
@lpslostagain Right, you don't watch TV anymore ... but you apparently do still watch YouTube. And you apparently are still suckered into it enough to comment. So ... is that really any better than watching TV, according to your own standards?
Satellite images will provide you proof of the flag that still stands on the moon. Oh, you don't trust satellite imagery? Try a telescope then. Oh, they might have put a lens on your telescope to lie to you?
I don't envy your paranoid life ...
alexdlaird 3 months ago
but they said the photos were faked
falcont2t 3 months ago
Thank you for busting the moon landing hoax mythbusters! Area 51 next?
bostonianbond007 3 months ago 23
@bostonianbond007 The thing is, Area 51 actually exists. There is an air force base at that location. The only question is what goes on there.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse Strip poker, the military isn't really proud of it.
I was particularly disappointed by the lack of healthy female soldiers. :P
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
@bostonianbond007 Area 51 exists moron
8MunchenBayern8 1 month ago
@8MunchenBayern8 But is it filled with aliens and time machines? No.
UberNoodleX 1 month ago
@bostonianbond007 You should watch penn and teller BS episode area 51
WickedJ133 1 month ago
Comment removed
Silversurfer1080 3 months ago
5:48 weightlessness proof
kitsurubami 3 months ago
zoom into the moon and show me the flag on the moon... and ill take ur word
lpslostagain 3 months ago
@lpslostagain
Get a moderately powerful telescope and look for yourself you fucking moron.
DeamonStorm666 3 months ago
@lpslostagain Japans LRO satellite took pics the landers and the moon rover, so what the hell more do you want?
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
Comment removed
lpslostagain 3 months ago
@lpslostagain What are you pretending to know about the radiation belt? Do you know anything about it? What kind of radiation is in it? How much Dose is in it? How much dose is fatal to humans? Dont just cut and paste big words, prove you know what you're talking about.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
prove this /watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM moon landing was fake IMO , and why have we never went back? what about the radiation belt? do you really think a TV SHOW will tell you the truth? they dont even go in it open minded, they all ready think it was real. it kinda makes me sick, its like, we landed and we will prove it, not , we dont know, we will find out. no wonder i dont watch tv no more
lpslostagain 3 months ago
prove this /watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM moon landing was fake IMO , and why have we never went back? what about the radiation belt? do you really think a TV SHOW will tell you the truth? they dont even go in it open minded, they all ready think it was real.
lpslostagain 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lpslostagain
Your a moron, do the world a favour, stop commenting on things you have no expertise in and fucking kill yourself!! Im British, I have no reason to lie. YOU LANDED ON THE MOON YOU MORON!!! Ask ANYONE outside of the USA who has no reason to lie to the American Public...YOU LANDED ON THE MOON YOU MORON!! The only people that think you didnt land on the moon, are cretins like you who know NOTHING OF THE FACTS! IDIOT!! FUCKTARD!!! GO GET A DARWIN AWARD FOR FUCKS SAKE!!
DeamonStorm666 3 months ago
@lpslostagain We went back 6 more times after the first run...
Wilson1592 3 months ago
@lpslostagain The footage you show is one of Bart Sibrel's famous manipulations. It has been discredited already.
We went back 6 times, China and other nations wish to go to the moon *as well*.
The leading expert and discoverer of the Van Allen Belts, Dr. Van Allen, had no problem with these belts.
Sometimes, you can trust in TV.
It *is* real.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
It's true that the flag can flap on the moon if it is set to motion.
But There are sequences in which the flag starts in motion without having been visibly shaken by the astronaut, and stops quite fast to flap without having been stopped by the astronaut, and this is abnormal.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked - I believe you're referring to a video where the flag seems to move after the astronaut walked passed. The problem with that video is that we cannot see between the astronaut and the flag, so we can't prove the astronaut didn't touch it. Regardless, it continues to swing for about 30 seconds, which wouldn't happen in earth's atmosphere. As for your claims about the flag in other sequences, I don't believe that's true, so I'll watch any videos you provide as proof with interest ;-)
MTMind2 4 months ago
@MTMind2
No, it is not this one I was thinking of.
I think of another video in which the flag starts flapping consistently, but the pole has visibly not been shaken by the astronaut.
And it stops very fast flapping whereas the astronaut has visibly made nothing to stop it.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@MTMind2
In what concerns the video in Apollo 15 in which an astronaut passes by and the flag flaps slightly, we can be sure he was not close to the extremity of the flag because he is consistently taller than the extremity of the flag, which would not have been the case if he had touched it.
hunchbacked 4 months ago
@hunchbacked - That's been argued over for years, with some even producing 3D computer models to show that he could have touched the flag with his arm/hand, some producing 3D models to show that he just misses the flag, theories about static on the nylon flag attracting it towards the astronaut, and yes, theories about wind too. But whatever those theories and opinions are, what we do know is that the flag swings, and does so about 30 seconds, hence shows no signs of any air resistance at all :)
MTMind2 4 months ago
@hunchbacked - And I think I seen all the flag flagging movies and had discussions on many of them, and yet I do not recall any video of the flag moving as you claim. In all the flag moving videos I've seen, with the exception of the the flag moving when that astronaut passes by, an astronaut is seen manipulating the flag pole, hence the reason for the flagging in 1/6th gravity and no air. Hence I look forward to your videos.
MTMind2 4 months ago
@hunchbacked - Sorry, silly typos, it should be "I've" not "I" and "flapping" not "flagging". But I'm tired, it's late, so in fact I'm the one who's "flagging", therefore I'm off to get some sleep now :-) ............
MTMind2 4 months ago
1:26 why have they slowed down their video of the test under vacuum?
bacchonysus 4 months ago
@bacchonysus They didn't, it just appears to be like that because of the lack of wind resistance. Just before 1:32 notice how Tory's expression changes. Now imagine that happening at a faster speed. Say, twice the speed as hoaxers insists. His face would be torn off or something.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
c est beau le cinema
cetaitdemain1 4 months ago
1:27 I can't believe I didn't see Tory peeping in through the window at the bottom until now. xD
Laurelindo 4 months ago
why not ? ! I always believe this
RomyCV93 4 months ago
WELL MAYBE THE NASA DID THE RECORDING... ON A PLANE HUHUHUUUUUUUUH : D
psyckho666 4 months ago
@psyckho666 :3
NorwayHack 4 months ago
Waht is really interesting was the fact that in my story, some astronauts actually fasted prior to launch as they became pilgrims. What a blessing it is to be part of a religion that harmonizes scientific fact with truthful prophecy.
SirGabriel2076 4 months ago
@SirGabriel2076 I hope that I don't get trolled for this.
SirGabriel2076 4 months ago
Respond to this video... Part of such truthfulness is the fact that it is impossible to hide your sins, so don't try it. Ultimate proof of such includes the fact that life becomes less fair once people stop becoming fair and just themselves.
SirGabriel2076 4 months ago
lol Sheeple.
MrPuntacan 4 months ago
REALLY IMPRESSED. I BELIEVE NOW
avatarmingtien 4 months ago 25
@avatarmingtien If you believe this episode of Mythbusters, when they are making points with errors, and was obviously inspired by NASA themselves, I am sure you believed the questionable footage and claims from the 60's already.
deathknight228 2 months ago
@deathknight228 What is questionable about it? I want to hear some real facts...We have so much evidence that even if we took hoaxters to the moon themselves they would claim the porthole was a tv screen...lol
Dmac11a666 2 months ago
@avatarmingtien Nice to hear.
Well actually you have the right to believe anything you want about this, just be open-minded enough to be able to accept explanations like the ones in this episode.
Laurelindo 2 months ago
lol. They shouldn't have had to test the flag. Newtons law of motion, if something is moving it will stay moving until stopped by an opposing force. In a vacuum there would be less force acting on the flag, thus any momentum gained from twisting would continue for a longer time.
You can also leave fairly distinct footprints in dust. A house that hasn't been lived in for a while for instance, easy to tell the size, shape and even make of the shoes when they've stepped in.
FraggingBard 4 months ago
@FraggingBard This is how little moon hoaxers know or are prepared to ignore.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
Those luck bastards. I want to experience 1/6 gravity, seems like so much fun.
ca1cifer 4 months ago
LOL , FROM 6:25 TO 6:29 WE SEE A ROPE ON TOP OF THE LEFT GUY IN THE VIDEO ON THE LEFT SIDE , THIS IS FAKE!!
TheDushMon 4 months ago
@TheDushMon - No rope, no wire, just video artifacts as proven here :-);
/watch?v=domtyECeabA
And here;
/watch?v=L9mYWWHREag
MTMind2 4 months ago
wht do u see at 6:25 - 6:29..left video..rope.
ero74178953 4 months ago
@ero74178953 Wow, I see not only one rope but 2! Strange how they both just appeared directly over the astronauts suits... Just when I was like forget the conspiracy we did land on the moon, I had to read your comment!... What are the chances of those strings just flashing above each of them... Damn... Someone explain that please!
Smoove808 4 months ago
@Smoove808 yeahp...u're right..so, this conspiracy is still need to be considered again.
ero74178953 4 months ago
@ero74178953 - Those are simply artifacts, which I go into detail here :-);
/watch?v=domtyECeabA
It's also discussed in the following video;
/watch?v=L9mYWWHREag
MTMind2 4 months ago
@ero74178953 - Oh wait, you already have. Seems you're in denial.
MTMind2 4 months ago
@Smoove808 - If those were ropes/wires, what are the chances of both flashing at EXACTLY the same time and for the same duration? You probably didn't spot it but, what are the chances of two dots of the same colour flashing for about the same duration in perfect alignment with those lines 3 seconds BEFORE the astronauts were in that position (6:24)?
Those are simply artifacts, which I go into detail here :);
/watch?v=domtyECeabA
It's also discussed in the following video;
/watch?v=L9mYWWHREag
MTMind2 4 months ago
@Smoove808 It's from the suit's antenna.
tiaxanderson 1 month ago
these are the easy to prove myths and they dont prove anything, since they can remake it.
anderskittilsen 4 months ago
@anderskittilsen they sure as hell couldn't remake it in 1969...
DoomSprite236 4 months ago
What concerns me most is that conspiracy theorists obviously view most other people as spineless liars - especially us scientists. Not only is that an incredibly dystopian and misanthrope view of the world, it is also insulting!
Nimmermaer 4 months ago
how do they no how much weight the astronauts had on them? Ive also seen plenty of footage of the flag fluttering on its own. Clearly the Myth busters were paid. ONE SIMPLE FACT IS!!...when they "landed" on the moon, there is absolutely NO crater created from the thrust of the spaceship. Whoever believes the moon landing is legit is an idiot.
batocccc 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@batocccc "how do they no how much weight the astronauts had on them?" Really? based off the weight of the suit and the equipment on them perhaps.
Do you think the mirrors we left on the Moon were just tossed out of the window during a flyby?
bigdaddyevil666 4 months ago
@batocccc And who believes that stuff should happen like in the movies is – at least – retarded.
BortolanAlexandre 4 months ago
@batocccc oh man...No crater should be expected. The Descent Propulsion System was throttled very far down during the final landing. The Moon lander was no longer quickly decelerating, so the descent engine only had to support the lander's own weight, which was lessened by the Moon's gravity and by the near exhaustion of the descent propellants..god damnit and if you did not infact go to the moon how there are retroflecters?
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
@batocccc I would like to see that footage of the flag waving itself because i've seen plenty of apollo footage and never seen the flag waving itself, except after they were positioning it and that its infact possible and logical. THE SIMPLE FACT is that every question hoax believers ask CAN BE and ARE already answered with scientific and logical arguments, arguments that no hoax believers have to support their theories.
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
@batocccc and also a fact is that an astronaut in one of the apollo missions did an experiment. dropping a hammer and a falcon feather at the same time, on the earth it is impossible that they fall at the same rate and hit the groung at the same time, and what happeneded on the moon is that both fell at the same rate and hit the ground at the same time, and THAT is impossible on earth even in the MOVIES.
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
hey mythbusters it's better you to test the van allen belt, in how you can pass there with thin aluminum body of apollo craft safe and alive...please we want to know..please!!! and please!!!
KelvongKlein 4 months ago
hey at 9:42 see the flag is not flapping but seems like it freeze whilst the astronouts moving...how much did they government paid to these mysthbustes?
KelvongKlein 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your mum went to the moon
Damithe909 4 months ago
Comment removed
Damithe909 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How come the people didn't get in the vac chamber in the moon suit? Busted,
Kubrick filmed the moon footage.
KubricksMoons 4 months ago
its funny about the flag myth in the first place because everything thats on the moon is totally different than on earth like come on seriosly gravity is less there is no wind thats true but there is less gravity come on people we learned this a long time ago.
yellowcorba1 4 months ago
I'm not debunking, but couldn't some robotic probe throw reflectors around the moon?
purvicide 4 months ago
@purvicide
A robot probe MIGHT have put reflectors there, but then the question becomes:::
WHAT robot probe? A probe built with blueprints you dont have? Written by engineers you cant name? Launched on a date you dont know in a rocket no one saw? Those probes?
And you see the problem. Any hoax pusher who tries this is making the newb mistake of explaining conspiracy A by inventing conspiracy B. You cant make up your story as you go.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse I see your point. Counter-theories exist in the presence of ambiguity, and there isn't much that occurs without gray areas. Every proposed government conspiracy is in regards to a largely trivial matter, in the sense of an average American's day-to-day livelihood, anyway.
purvicide 4 months ago
BUSTED !!! thx for posting !!
1MtnBoy 4 months ago
LOOK AT THE MOON DUST BEING PUSHED OUT BY THE ASTRONAUTS WHEN JUMPING. IT MOVES PRETTY FAST. IF THIS WAS SLOW-MO'D, YOU'D HAVE A MUCH SLOWER DIRT MOVEMENT.
VamYang 4 months ago
Can someone please tell me exactly how to find that "extra" that Adam is talking about?
I've tried checking the link he mentions but I can't find anything there.
Laurelindo 4 months ago
@Laurelindo I looked too and I didnt see the "Extra's" either.............
1MtnBoy 4 months ago
I don't understand why the hoaxers fight this event so hysterically - do they even WANT the moon landings to be true in the first place?
It seems like they hate the whole thing and feel miserable everytime they get their hoax theoriest debunked.
BE PROUD of this historic event instead ffs, there's absolutely no reason NOT to be! If you have questions, just ask them to a physicist or anyone who's somewhat knowledgeable and ACCEPT the answers you get.
Laurelindo 5 months ago
@Laurelindo they must be jealous. if they couldnt go than nobody can. WHAAAA !! lol
1MtnBoy 4 months ago
God dammit, MythBusters are always changing my opinion on shit...
TieFreaty 5 months ago 38
@TieFreaty Im not a conspiracy theorist, but you, sir, are retarded. if the myth was approved do you really think they'd let them show it on fucking television??
channesw 4 months ago
@channesw Calm down man, talking shit over the internet doesnt make you cool, it just makes you a person who is too scared to talk to someone man to man, I honestly bet you havent said half of the stuff you tell people on the internet as to what you say too people in real life. Now quit being a troll and get outside, do something with your life, because replying to my comment that had nothing wrong with it, just makes it seem like you like to complain... K bye.
TieFreaty 4 months ago
@TieFreaty "I honestly bet you havent said half of the stuff you tell people on the internet as to what you say too people in real life."
Tbh, I've hurt way too many people by telling them things they're trying to repress. I'm not sure if that's a good trait, though.
"replying to my comment that had nothing wrong with it, just makes it seem like you like to complain"
You just replied to mine, so I can conclude you like to complain?
channesw 4 months ago
@channesw Since I could really care less for what you have to say whatever you send me is just gonna be deleted. My comment had nothing wrong with it, and I dont even see why you replied to it with such anger in the first place... So please, get a friend.
TieFreaty 4 months ago
@TieFreaty "Since I could really care less for what you have to say whatever you send me is just gonna be deleted. My comment had nothing wrong with it"
This is what wise men call arrogance.
Maybe you ought to open your ears instead of just blocking them, shouting "shut up! shut up! shut up!".
Whether or not I have a friend is irrelevant.
channesw 3 months ago