Aviation - Boeing 747 - Airplane Crash (Explosion)

[OberammergauTV]

Cheap, Cheaper, your video...

[eatingcatshit]

A similar thing happened to me while the stewardess was serving me my peanuts and water.

[datzfast]

the last time i farted on a plne they wish this happend. it didnt , an in flight emergency was declared and the aircraft was forced down. the oxygen system was deployed sparing the occupants. Im now on the no fly list.

[TonyAirlines]

Wonder what happens if they do the same thing to an A380.

[MrGigichelu]

lol its ass fell off xD

[DeadTallyNo9]

thats what happened the last time i farted on an airplane.... 

[mibs56]

you are now cleared to fly

[TheLofty97]

this is a test it is loaded with 200 grams of semtax bombs

[platypusone]

Thats enough damage to cause complications when flying.

[FoundationsofPause]

@platypusone Things become far less complicated after that explosion.

[platypusone]

@FoundationsofPause lol, yes I suppose they do :)

[paulkalin]

@platypusone lol yeah doesnt look like it passed the explosion test

[fil30stm]

i dont like it ! lol :D

[ctechreviews]

was this airplane retired? it looks like it because the windows have rust or residue running down them....i guess it could be a test

[Adzzgray777]

@ctechreviews yeah, it has no engines and they have taken parts of the elevator and rudder.

[legomaster335]

nooooooo they used a 747-100!

[MAMALEMON1000]

wow so much money to buy a 747

[jetaddicted]

stop breaking aircraft!!!give them to me instead....

[andreysoipr]

חבבל אל המטווס !!!

[skazhiprivet]

It was a test to see what comments people would post...

:-D

[KartKing4ever]

PWN3D

[abdelmoumen111]

it wase a test u noob

[plsniper]

@abdelmoumen111 No, it was not a test. They couldn't get the rear cargo door to open, so they had to blow. The only problem is that they didn't ask the passengers to deplane first.

[HiddenW0rld]

@abdelmoumen111 Don't insult people !

[abdelmoumen111]

@HiddenW0rld FUCK YOU

[HiddenW0rld]

@abdelmoumen111 Ahah abdel, go where you know ! LOL

[abdelmoumen111]

@HiddenW0rld ??? your fucked came back when you have better insolts

[HiddenW0rld]

@abdelmoumen111 I'm not here to insult people like you ! ;)

[MrMsjavier]

fuck both of you!!! bitches

[ironqqq]

very lame. this is an explosion. not a crash

[upurzfag]

oi dick head...

read what the video is called...

areplane crash(EXPLOSION) --- read idiot...

[pingpongpung]

Read the title idiot. It says explosion.

[lhrlyc]

so no crash then? just a test explosion

[94Mates]

oh nov nice boeing jumbo BUM :´(

[DeathsOneDesign]

This was just a test to see the effects of a mid-air explosion on a 747

[BMuris]

This is the reason why no burritos are served on a plane, too much gas haha :)

Just kidding, but yes you are right, I am sure they pressurized the plane etc. and tested it. Thanks to tests such as this, they can create safer transportation for us. Great job!

[SenorSpode]

@DeathsOneDesign Correct. This test was performed on one of the first 747s built, which Air France retired. It had over 75,000 airframe hours at the time. The walls of the forward baggage holds were lined with Kevlar mesh--while the rears were not--and explosive containers put inside of them and detonated to see if the Kevlar made a difference. It did. Test performed May 17, 1997 per Air International magazine.

[nhvjvbhvg]

This is a TESTE because

The airplane explose in the air

This is 747-300 Air India is explose in the air

[vwsambabus]

no it's a 747-100

[coolestdudeisUS]

That was a test to see how a terrorest attack on a plane would look like

[OreoLivesOn]

how did it explode?

[HOTMAN8912]

mazing aircraft, but why does the skin have to be so weak...?? imagine that in mid air.. the thing just freeking split! =/

[yoyoyoyoshua]

@HOTMAN8912 cause planes need to be lite

[gogotomo123456]

dont know what the guy in that seat had eaten

[elcheato3]

Lots of beans. How do you think the plane blew up?

[planelover195]

that was funny you made my day

[bnssapp]

thats a test....

[palebeachbum]

the explosion is slow powerful you can actually see it force smoke out of the nose of the plane in the very beginning. Powerful bomb!

[sdthird10]

wtf

[gocal777]

747-100 , it was a test after the Lockabee incdent

[kenersej]

lockabee :'(

[PTK76]

no it was a test after richard reed the so called shoe bomber tried to carry out his attempt at downing a plane. This showed the jury what wld have happened. what a prick!

[neilzep]

yep,thats why we have to take our stinking shoes off at the airport.

[ABBAERIC]

LoL there goes 250 million dollers

[BMusic55]

it looked a bit funny! xD

[nelizmastr]

this probably was a 747-100

those things were really crappy

[sarkizmutafyan]

This test was made after the bombing of Air India 182 to show to the investigators how powerful the bomb was...Watch Air Crash Investigation: Explosive Evidence!

[RedDynasty123]

that was a test

[BlindShorty11]

wtf crash just like that??i think theres a bomb in it!

[spudule]

yeah, that was a test

[ConnecticutFA]

airplanes have set life cycles of around 70,000 flights before they are only worth their weight in scrap.

Concidering they wheigh 200,000+lbs they are still worth as much as a house in scrap.

the 6061 and 7075 is worth around a 1.50 a pound scrap.

Copper around 3 bucks a pound

titanium around 20 bucks aound

stainless if its 17 13 or 15 series is worth around 5 bucks a pound. if its a286 alot more around 9 bucks a pound scrap. Nickel aint cheap.

[Jordan32112]

WOW! thats a cheap plane!

[sylarxxxx]

mrivera1. I didn't recognise this a first, but remembered it on reading your comment. As I remember, they tested the front bomb 1st, and the plane just jumped in the air. The anti-bomb lining worked a treat. Unfortunately, you're right that airlines don't consider our lives to be worth the money. See also "Boeing 707 terrible impact crash". Don't get me started on airport scanners that detect explosive chemicals rather than relying on people to see a tiny bomb in thousands of pieces of luggage.

[poelaertpieterjan]

sign the petition on my video page! save brussels airport!

[GarryRussell]

Bomb test done in England on parts recovered ex Air France Boeung 747 (F-BPVE).....note no engines.

[blondebev101]

holy fuck!!!!

[porkypker27]

atleast that didn't happen in the air.........

[Golf103]

uhhh.....by the looks of this, this looked like a fake 747 bomb test. of course the bomb will probably kill people and destryoy the plane, but you dont need to test it. If a bomb goes off on a plane, BOOM! it blows up and people get hurt.

[Eansinn]

this was to test an experimental type of container that was resistant to bomb explosions, obviously it didn't work.

[mrivera1]

Actually it did, the bomb resistant containers were in the front of the plane, near the cockpit, along with some reinforced body panels on the side of the plane... the explosion that is seen is from the regular containers and no reinforcement. The bomb went off in the front, without so much as a small dent in the fuselage. The test results were just as the scientists predicted.

[Eansinn]

So are they using those containers now?

[mrivera1]

Unfortunately not, because the containers cost more than what the airlines are willing to pay, and they are a lot less resilient than a regular container, because if you crash into one, it is a write off. The cost of doing business, is all that prevents them from being used.

[Eansinn]

oh well, back to just hoping there isn't a bomb on board;)

[byuclan]

No, if a bomb goes off on the ground there snt much pressure so thje aircraft just blows up. If thios was at 30,000 feet it wouldnt blow up, it wouldnt even denmt the outisde. It would jsut kill a few people on the inside, thats why it has to be tested.

[737PilotBarry]

The Cabin was pressurised for this test. The forward cargo compartments were lined with special reinforced lining. The rear one was unprotected. This shows the scale of damage a bomb would actually do in mid air in a pressurised hull. There was minimal damage in the front part of the plane.

[gpmotors68]

TERRORISM??????

[burnsyliam]

They blew this up controlled to test if Flight 182 Air India blew up by a bomb. By doing this they found out that it was

[quinnr441]

Yeah it was a test. 200 grams of Semtex on pressurized 747 (30,000 ft)

[loomspan]

Bitch, I said NO SMOKING in the toilets. Prick.

[puncusu]

cat thats was horrible imagine that in the air worst my cat

[plutorevolution]

to be honest, I think that this and the CID test that NASA conducted were just excuses to blow up/crash stuff because they don't really prove anything! If a bomb blows up on a plane, it's going to be destructive, and if a plane crashes, people are going going to get hurt (physically and financialy)...you don't need to destroy a plane to know that....

[ivanchikatillo]

they learn how to blow another bulding as they did before

[windmillcrusader]

So the same sized bomb blew up in the front compartments, but the plane was not seriously injured?

Amazing. I wonder what the weight and cost of the containers in the front are?

[annyonghaseyo90]

i think the containers were expensive but a liner that could be used on the inside skin of the 747 was cheap

[bommmmmmmm]

This 747 was an ex Air France one. It was at the end of its working life. The usefull bits were taken and the hull was pressured to the equivalent of 37000 feet to test the effects of a bomb with a new type of cargo container. Two bombs were used. The first one was in the front hold in the new container which held together ok and prevented the hull from blowing. The contaner in the rear was the standard type. As you can see it failed and the hull then burst under the pressure of the blast.

[danzelbar]

it isnt crash because that aircraft is wery old so it cant use

[guitarkaitlyn]

wow

[bassclefman]

Where'd they get the plane??? Was it the mock-up they used in James Bond movies??

[AshleeSkye]

what is really amazing in this video is the POOR QUALITY FOOTAGE ! u don't blow a 747 avery day so let's take several views, close-up, slow motion, etc

[baetores]

It is staged (experimental), it is to show what a pretty small bomb on board a plane can do.

[windmillcrusader]

hmmm, staged. no tail number on the plane, no airline labels and part of the "rudder" was missing prior to the explosion.

That plane couldn't fly, i bet the engines were not even real (the expensive part of any plane).

[choidj]

It was a retired Air France 747. It was a test.

[wranglerguy06]

There were no Engines on this aircraft You asshole~!

[smartbotX]

like the TNT airline

[Xujarke]

good one

[dedonno]

A lesson well learned, never bring TNT or any kind of explosive on an plane.

[saszer20]

hahahaha... hahaha... :) thats true, never bring any explosives on the plane :) especially bombs and all that stufff...

[fredriksvensk1234567]

wtf