Added: 3 years ago
From: joefaulk
Views: 371
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • There is every need to bring morality into it, otherwise you end up with immoral laws just because some jerk who gets elected swallows your immoral arguments about using productive people to create jobs... as though the purpose of productive activity were activity (employment) rather than production (goods and services).

    A is A.

  • But there's no such thing as morality, which is why it is destructive to the social order to make compulsory law systems.

  • This argument is absolutely wrong. In the case of the inelastic demand some of those companies will simply go bust because they have to have a certain number of workers but the workers are priced out.

    You need also to think morally: minimum wages are the gov't stepping between two people and banning them from interacting on a voluntary basis; that is fundamentally immoral.

  • The minimum wage however prompts companies to autamate much faster.

  • Chart 2 which demonstrates "inelastic demand" is flawed in two ways. First, it relies on perfect inelasticity , which never exists. Second, it assumes that production costs could somehow magically be absorbed rather than affecting the price, quality and/or quantity of the goods and services produced. Also, your ability to use political power to put some, (even one), out of work for the benefit of others is morally and ethically callous. You really need to read Frederic Bastiat.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more