And the suggestion that conservatives are less 'liberal' because they are intellectually incapable of handling the controlled 'chaos' of liberalism is just laughable. In actual fact it is the left and supposed 'liberals' who are often the most controlloing, nannying, censoring and interfering bunch going. This is just another classic example of leftist arrogance - "our ideological opponents cannot possibly be right, they must either be mad or just plain stupid.... "
Could coughlan616 and his fellow liberals explain why China and Japan have on average the highest IQ scores in the world, despite being traditionally very conservative peoples? And does anybody know what the political leanings are of those who undertook this 'study' (15000 out of 6 billion people) and interpreted its results?? Are they themselves all conservatives now consoling one another that their inferior IQ is responsible for their outlook? I think we all know the answer to that....
did you have to be so ignorant and say the f word before God, what is wrong with you, can you not make a video without driving away at least 3/4 of your potential audience, why the blasphemy also? how dare you say such. May Allah Guide the ignorant, peace.
@SuperBrobot Any link I go to over there, has nothing but starlet and fashion gossip tags on the side bar. Is that what is considered to be conservative in jolly old England?
Most of academics today are nothing but a bunch of ideologists plotting against all those who disagree with their views.
I have 10 years of academic background + teaching at university level in order to state that.
There are huge scandals (that somehow msm does not talk much about if at all) of students not passing merely for having different political views than their professors.
That explains how you "worked hard" to get your grades. I am sure you did.
You fucking retarded liberal comrade.
The academic environment today is infested of leftist dolts like yourself and this is why we have the sort of news on the msm we have today and buildings need to be fully repaired after three years they have been built, because of the mediocracy of the socialist idiocrats.
Libertarianism is not "right" nor "left", you shoud know that if you have a "degree", what a hatetard.
Loser is someone who believes that destroying a healthy economy while killing their people with ignorant bureaucratic paranoias and impossible promises of equality works.
Failed 90 out of 90 times it has been tried, and people like you still believe it! 8D
@SyndicalistTimes To be right wing it would imply it endorsed military action and religious/traditional principles, it is far from this. It is something new.
So you dont know what you are talking about as usual.
"What exacly has failed"??? Look at the entire occident around you collapsing thanks to socialist economic models (state overregulamentation) and cultural marxism.
Read a darn history book and see how all countries who applied socialism collapsed by default.
@SyndicalistTimes There is no such a thing as "capitalism", this was a terminology created by Marx to build up a strawman so he could attack, it is something natural to human kind called trade or barter.
Just like calling anyone who disagrees with socialist principles "right wing" or "reactionary", (instead of having a valid argument) so the useful idiots (what Lenin used to call all those who helped him) to do their bidding.
"this was a terminology created by Marx to build up a strawman so he could attack."
You're proving your stupidity by stating a blatant lie like that.
Capitalism has existed since around the 16th century, and it has been written about long before Marx was ever born. You are such an obvious right-wing religious nut. If you believe in god, you'll believe in any bullshit, you're a fool.
@SyndicalistTimes Problem is that illeterate people in power are rarely intelligent rule.
Marx didnt know what he was talking about for instance, he just wanted to kill anyone who disagreed with him (what he never denied) while making poetry about serving the dark lord, have you ever read his poetry?
He was as coocoo as Crowley as those were the days people like them could get away with their stupidity.
I have doubts about this study. How does it define right wing?
If it's talking about social conservatism, alright then, but right wing is used to describe a lot more. In America, at least, right wing is thought of as capitalistic, and obviously, political belief is a scale. I'm more "right wing", though not a capitalist, in my economic beliefs then some of my other friends, does that mean I'm more primal in thought?
Off to find an article to explain how they define right wing.
@JustAnotherHumanist It sounds to me like this article is focussing mainly on things like religious bigotry, homophobia and racism and not really talking much about where people's beliefs are in the scale between laissez faire economies, which operate with little intervention from the government and communist ones that are largely centrally controlled.
@DwiteTheSpriteKnight I'm sure it is. My point is just that using "right wing" is to use a vague term, in what's probably an attempt for controversy and publicity.
@JustAnotherHumanist I think you're right about the phrase right wing being deliberately used to stir up more controversy than just using words like bigotry or prejudice would. I do suspect people with racially prejudiced views etc are in fact more likely to condone a dog eat dog extreme of capitalism though. A tabloid newspaper article is unlikely to go beyond generalisations is it.
@evensgrey more like, the more unintelligent you are, the more likely you are to find comfort in black and white, simplistic explanations like "if ya aint conservutiv, you mus loik stalin!!!! LOL"
@kingOFtheFISHpeople Which leaves the question of whether the study makes this mistake, or it's just another example of lazy European journalists labeling standard extreme-leftist causes as 'right wing' or 'conservative'.
the daily mail. the daily right wing pro Israel propaganda feed. one of many programming sheets, for sale at the local newsagents. get your mind fitted out with the latest fashion, be like beckham, kiss the queens brown ring and pray to parliament.... long live Iran, warts and all.
The Guardian is just as biased as The Daily Mail ...if not more so. Both of the are shocking propaganda machines disguised as independent journalism...
It's funny, but it always seemed to me that Social Conservatism is Tribalism in a Suit; Social Conservatives are always operating under the aegis of tribalism, "us vs. them", etc. Actually, a nurse recently told me that this was the case - this is the first time that I've heard a scientific basis for this view :)
@Klingschor Not disagreeing (or agreeing) with your observation, but I'll point out that a nurse saying something is not by any of those definitions "scientific"; it's barely a "basis". Please don't say things like this, that imply science is something it is not.
I don't think you understood my comment - I said that a nurse said this was the case, HOWEVER, the study that COUGHLAN cited was the first scientific evidence I've heard for this view (as opposed to an anecdote related by a nurse).
Ever tried shoving a wet noodle up a bobcats ass? Now that is difficult! And hours of fun. If you try please post results. Just to show these fuckwits what they look like.
The Daily Mail just published (a dozen days ago) an insane propaganda "article" by David Rose that claimed MET Office scientists said the exact opposite of what the scientists said. The scientists are very upset.
I find the article to be very badly worded and misleading for a number of reasons (not a surprise considering it's source), the main one being the use of the term "right wing". Assuming it's simply using the Left-Right scale (which is obsolete) and not the Nolan Chart, it basically brands all right-wingers as extreme social conservatives. This puts me in a weird position because my economic views tend to throw me into the right wing, despire me being socially liberal and anti-prejudice.
I have to admit that my old man is a Mail reader and it's quite sad how he has plummeted into these kinds of depths. Back in the day, just before I was born(1969) he was a peace loving hippy who hated the establishment, plus he has an IQ of about 130. What the fuck happened to him? What rotted his brain? I still bully him about his choice of toilet paper newspaper, I really do.
I see you have your own print version of Fox News. What a delight! Now you too can enjoy the rambling idiocy of the conservative right and save it in your attic to use as wrapping for fragile pieces when you die.
Also, working class is synonymous with "stupid". This is unfortunate, since there are many bright working class individuals such as CoctopusPrime and Inmendham. How do I know they are working class? Their choice of words, accents, environments, and sense of style gives them away.
This is because the working class believes the sensationalism that right wing outlets engage in. Working class schools also don't teach critical thinking and analytical abilities whereas middle class and above schools emphasize the process of problem solving and analytical abilities. They also stress other kinds of intelligence other than memorizing facts by rote. I've heard that half of some schools are the vocational part! Business law in such schools is probably significantly downplayed.
Innate intelligence, eh? Well there goes the idea that we can use rational argument and persuasion to raise peoples consciousnesses. I guess that leaves us no other option. Cull the stupid! It's clearly an idea who's time has come.
Have you noticed how 'controversial study' seems to mean 'may annoy some people'? It doesn't ever seems to mean the results are disputed in a scientific sense.
Maybe they are trying to find out if their readers are actually reading there shit , would like to see their letters page after this it will be all uuurr ooo uuurr uurgh uuurgh faggot liberals uurgh .
Assuming the study is valid - at least they are being honest? Papers should ideally not refrain from news that don't support their reader-bases biases after all. I have my doubts given the source that these kind of strict journalistic principles was the reason it got printed - but if it was then hey, can't fault em for that...
Fox news covered this; I forget who the personalities were it was a morning show. All they could come up with as a defense was, "well, what was their motivation for doing this study?" And, "Oh yeah, well conservative women are hotter." It was like catching someone lying and having them come back at you with, "well, why would you even check if I was lying?" They are making it too easy.
I can't believe I'm saying this but it sounds very communist. It makes you wonder how much actual research for into these articles or if 'journalists' just regurgitate what they're fed. All the papers are batting for the same side just as all political parties are essentially the same. Everyone is equal but some are more equal than others (or otters as my predictive wanted to put) As the late great George Carlin once put, the only real choice you get is what flavour crisps/donut/drink you want.
Ha ha Dick maybe your winning , that is a bit of stunner though the daly mail just admitting that the themselves are the paper of retards ha ha cant believe it too funny !
Before I ever actually read any articles from the Daily Mail, I always assumed its reputation was probably exaggerated... then I read some of their articles and realised there was no exaggeration at all. It's sad that there are enough backward-brained people in the country to keep such a publication in print.
"depression is the new trendy illness" ... right, cause everyone's that depressed is just faking it, they're not really depressed at all, they just love hating their lives, and hating themselves, and even sometimes wanting to die.
"Marijuana causes insanity"... really? really?... that must be why there are so many potheads that are perfectly fine mentally?
"End this Equal Rights madness"... Fuck you. End this Daily Mail madness
A scientific study to prove that left-wing IQ's>right-wing IQ's? What's next? A sudy attempting to prove that it is darker at night than during the day? Peace.
so fucking confused was this in the paper today? ill grab one from the shop if it is (i have never got one before but i need to shove it in a mates face), or is it just on there website
A good rule of thumb is not to believe a fucking word the Daily Mail prints but this threw me off slightly. I don't honestly know how to feel about this.
I've resolved this issue by declaring the Daily Mail is so right wing that it discriminates even against itself. That it is so retarded that it doesn't possess any awareness when it declares it's own stupidity. Now I can sleep.
My guess is that the Daily Mail's message wasn't "Well shucks, science says we conservatives are actually stupid. I guess that settles it, then!", but rather "Would you look at how unbelievably biased scientists are towards leftism! It's not enough for them to promote socialist ideas like climate change and evolution, now they just come up with a "study" that "proves" their side right. They're not even trying to hide their communist colours anymore!"
@ConscientiousMind "It's not enough for them to promote socialist ideas like climate change and evolution," Are they really that stupid and deluded? You honestly think they associate poltics with proven science? Oh yeah, wait, i forgot. We are talking about the Daily Mail here.
I have (or had) an IQ of 136 (according to the WISC-tests, which are for children though, as I was 15 or so when they measured it), and I'm ashamed to say that I used to be a nationalist. But only until I was 20 years or so. Then, reason kicked in.
One of my University lecturers is an editorial illustrator and got a job for the Daily Mail. Apparently they specifically told him not to make the illustration too metaphorical or clever, because the readers wouldn't understand it. I don't think anyone was surprised.
@Coughlan616 The daily mail is a right wing newspaper, yet they still printed that article? WOW! I wonder if they realize how they just insulted their own readers.
I, for one, am deeply shocked. Where on earth do intellectual luminaries like AmetTriBlimpnugget and DanishGreatBallLicker fit into this? Their razor sharp deconstruction of geopolitics and wholehearted defence of their lack of pigmentation certainly suggests they are on the right. To suggest that, as this article most surely does, they are nothing but thick witted saliva factories seems to do them an injustice.
Dou you wanna know when this liberal news media shit started? The Fifties when they were showing civil rights protesters getting attacked by dogs and McCarthy was being revealed for the scum bag he was. It got worse when the news started showing what the Viet Nam war I know it went through the Kennedy era, Liberalism is a set of principles, not a political party) really was. Then the voices got loader during Watergate through to Iran Contra and the Iraq War and its sequel.
cont.: Everytime Con politicians get caught doing stupid shit they blame a Liberal agenda so that the information people are getting is automatically discounted as false. How exactly would a Liberal agenda help the corporations that show the news? If anything there is an entertainment agenda to the news.
@lDrownded2 I know, i was trying to be sarcstic in my comment (and failed it would appears) as that those who even read the daily mail will turn against their own newspaper if they start showing info like in the video. people once in a narrow mind set they will ignore any contrasting evidence even if presented to them.
That's a study bookmarked by me in ten secs or less to be used to piss off right winged morons from now on. Thanks for mentioning it Richard. Think i'll have great fun with that one:)
..and yeah.. The irony in this case is amazing..and funny:-)
This is amazing......I am really lost for words...
BPMification 5 days ago
Amazing xD I'm a right winged bisexual male who is strongly against racism. I must be an illusion. :(
Anarchosaur 1 week ago
And the suggestion that conservatives are less 'liberal' because they are intellectually incapable of handling the controlled 'chaos' of liberalism is just laughable. In actual fact it is the left and supposed 'liberals' who are often the most controlloing, nannying, censoring and interfering bunch going. This is just another classic example of leftist arrogance - "our ideological opponents cannot possibly be right, they must either be mad or just plain stupid.... "
DarkAngelOfHellingly 2 weeks ago
Could coughlan616 and his fellow liberals explain why China and Japan have on average the highest IQ scores in the world, despite being traditionally very conservative peoples? And does anybody know what the political leanings are of those who undertook this 'study' (15000 out of 6 billion people) and interpreted its results?? Are they themselves all conservatives now consoling one another that their inferior IQ is responsible for their outlook? I think we all know the answer to that....
DarkAngelOfHellingly 2 weeks ago
I'm so gonna show this video to my stupid ass friend.
Williamtipq 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Coughlan - Islamo-Ignorant. Blind to overtly fascist, racist, homophobic and unfathomably misogynistic ideology if it happens to be Muslim.
How else do your explain your wilful blindness to a very repressive ideology?
NowLearnAboutIslam 2 weeks ago
So what explains the over-religiosity and the higher than white american rate of homophobia among blacks? Are they just dumb? Low IQ?
shelzoth 2 weeks ago
did you have to be so ignorant and say the f word before God, what is wrong with you, can you not make a video without driving away at least 3/4 of your potential audience, why the blasphemy also? how dare you say such. May Allah Guide the ignorant, peace.
SOA4ever 2 weeks ago
retarded? what does that even mean?
ppauly 2 weeks ago
The Daily Mail is the finest comedy publication ever. Trumps any former accolades of, for instance, Private Eye, Viz or....erm....The Beezer.
bifta5000 2 weeks ago
google :
' i just pissed off peter hitchens '
VonLeachim 3 weeks ago
I always thought Daily Mail was a parody of actual journalism.
SuperBrobot 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from Coughlan616
@SuperBrobot Any link I go to over there, has nothing but starlet and fashion gossip tags on the side bar. Is that what is considered to be conservative in jolly old England?
ISamuelII 2 weeks ago
1:54
hondjevogel 3 weeks ago
love the daily mail, for me the best online paper out there
MrStraight2hell 3 weeks ago
Academiscism is dead.
It has been dead for the last 50 years at least.
Most of academics today are nothing but a bunch of ideologists plotting against all those who disagree with their views.
I have 10 years of academic background + teaching at university level in order to state that.
There are huge scandals (that somehow msm does not talk much about if at all) of students not passing merely for having different political views than their professors.
Its a disgrace really.
theawesomebeliever 3 weeks ago
@theawesomebeliever
you have a problem with intelligent rule? Obviously got a low IQ...
SyndicalistTimes 2 weeks ago
@SyndicalistTimes On the contrary, apparently you did not read what I wrote and if you did, you did not get it.
I am a noocrat. temporarily libertarian as this is the best vehicle right now to get there.
Academics today are retarded and their grades consist on how good they can suck a dick or/and be a good comrade to their professors.
You see, you were doing alright when you asked me about what I ment, however when you jumped into conclusions before a reply... premature IQ?
theawesomebeliever 2 weeks ago
@theawesomebeliever
"Academics today are retarded and their grades consist on how good they can suck a dick or/and be a good comrade to their professors."
That is complete nonsense. I got my degree through studying and working hard for it, as did every other graduate I know.
There's no point in discussing with an imbecile like you who just makes up bullshit.
Libertarians are fucking retarded capitalists.
SyndicalistTimes 2 weeks ago
@SyndicalistTimes Let me guess, you are a left winger.
That explains how you "worked hard" to get your grades. I am sure you did.
You fucking retarded liberal comrade.
The academic environment today is infested of leftist dolts like yourself and this is why we have the sort of news on the msm we have today and buildings need to be fully repaired after three years they have been built, because of the mediocracy of the socialist idiocrats.
Pfuei.
theawesomebeliever 2 weeks ago
@theawesomebeliever
LOL that's because leftists are more intelligent than right-wingers. You cry like a bitch because you're a loser.
SyndicalistTimes 2 weeks ago
@SyndicalistTimes Get your facts straight, bitch:
Libertarianism is not "right" nor "left", you shoud know that if you have a "degree", what a hatetard.
Loser is someone who believes that destroying a healthy economy while killing their people with ignorant bureaucratic paranoias and impossible promises of equality works.
Failed 90 out of 90 times it has been tried, and people like you still believe it! 8D
theawesomebeliever 2 weeks ago
@theawesomebeliever
libertarianism IS right-wing, whether or not you think it is. It is about the 'old-fashioned capitalist values' which are indeed right-wing.
Now you're just trash-talking because you ran out of rationality a long time ago.
That middle paragraph sounds like 'ignorant paranoia' to me, since it sure has zero relevance to the topic-at-hand.
What exactly has 'failed'? Equality is simply a concept that the law treats citizens the same. That is all. It works
SyndicalistTimes 2 weeks ago
@SyndicalistTimes To be right wing it would imply it endorsed military action and religious/traditional principles, it is far from this. It is something new.
So you dont know what you are talking about as usual.
"What exacly has failed"??? Look at the entire occident around you collapsing thanks to socialist economic models (state overregulamentation) and cultural marxism.
Read a darn history book and see how all countries who applied socialism collapsed by default.
Putz.
theawesomebeliever 2 weeks ago
@theawesomebeliever
libertarianism IS right-wing, whether or not you think it is. It is about the 'old-fashioned capitalist values' which are indeed right-wing.
Now you're just trash-talking because you ran out of rationality a long time ago.
That middle paragraph sounds like 'ignorant paranoia' to me, since it sure has zero relevance to the topic-at-hand.
What exactly has 'failed'? Equality is simply a concept that the law treats citizens the same. That is all. It works
SyndicalistTimes 2 weeks ago
@SyndicalistTimes There is no such a thing as "capitalism", this was a terminology created by Marx to build up a strawman so he could attack, it is something natural to human kind called trade or barter.
Just like calling anyone who disagrees with socialist principles "right wing" or "reactionary", (instead of having a valid argument) so the useful idiots (what Lenin used to call all those who helped him) to do their bidding.
Odd that you do not know all that.
theawesomebeliever 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@theawesomebeliever
"this was a terminology created by Marx to build up a strawman so he could attack."
You're proving your stupidity by stating a blatant lie like that.
Capitalism has existed since around the 16th century, and it has been written about long before Marx was ever born. You are such an obvious right-wing religious nut. If you believe in god, you'll believe in any bullshit, you're a fool.
SyndicalistTimes 2 weeks ago
@theawesomebeliever
libertarianism IS right-wing, whether or not you think it is. It is about the 'old-fashioned capitalist values' which are indeed right-wing.
Now you're just trash-talking because you ran out of rationality a long time ago.
That middle paragraph sounds like 'ignorant paranoia' to me, since it sure has zero relevance to the topic-at-hand.
Equality just means that people are treated the same in the eyes of the law. It does work, actually.
SyndicalistTimes 2 weeks ago
@SyndicalistTimes Problem is that illeterate people in power are rarely intelligent rule.
Marx didnt know what he was talking about for instance, he just wanted to kill anyone who disagreed with him (what he never denied) while making poetry about serving the dark lord, have you ever read his poetry?
He was as coocoo as Crowley as those were the days people like them could get away with their stupidity.
theawesomebeliever 2 weeks ago
keep it up coughlan, dont let haters put you off! love u bro
SICKM0F0 3 weeks ago
I have doubts about this study. How does it define right wing?
If it's talking about social conservatism, alright then, but right wing is used to describe a lot more. In America, at least, right wing is thought of as capitalistic, and obviously, political belief is a scale. I'm more "right wing", though not a capitalist, in my economic beliefs then some of my other friends, does that mean I'm more primal in thought?
Off to find an article to explain how they define right wing.
JustAnotherHumanist 3 weeks ago
@JustAnotherHumanist It sounds to me like this article is focussing mainly on things like religious bigotry, homophobia and racism and not really talking much about where people's beliefs are in the scale between laissez faire economies, which operate with little intervention from the government and communist ones that are largely centrally controlled.
DwiteTheSpriteKnight 3 weeks ago
@DwiteTheSpriteKnight I'm sure it is. My point is just that using "right wing" is to use a vague term, in what's probably an attempt for controversy and publicity.
JustAnotherHumanist 3 weeks ago
@JustAnotherHumanist I think you're right about the phrase right wing being deliberately used to stir up more controversy than just using words like bigotry or prejudice would. I do suspect people with racially prejudiced views etc are in fact more likely to condone a dog eat dog extreme of capitalism though. A tabloid newspaper article is unlikely to go beyond generalisations is it.
DwiteTheSpriteKnight 3 weeks ago
His son is working for the Daily Mail........It's a steady job, but he wants to be a paper back writer.
movement26 3 weeks ago
Sio, the smarter you are the more likely you are to become a psycopathic theiving murderer (that is to say, a Socialist)?
evensgrey 3 weeks ago
@evensgrey more like, the more unintelligent you are, the more likely you are to find comfort in black and white, simplistic explanations like "if ya aint conservutiv, you mus loik stalin!!!! LOL"
kingOFtheFISHpeople 3 weeks ago
@kingOFtheFISHpeople Which leaves the question of whether the study makes this mistake, or it's just another example of lazy European journalists labeling standard extreme-leftist causes as 'right wing' or 'conservative'.
evensgrey 3 weeks ago
@evensgrey Right on
theawesomebeliever 3 weeks ago
This guy looks a COMPLETE retard
robpea100 3 weeks ago
Its almost as if these days, the new glasses are apparently real 3d glasses. damn you odeon!
Jameswaterslive 3 weeks ago
the daily mail. the daily right wing pro Israel propaganda feed. one of many programming sheets, for sale at the local newsagents. get your mind fitted out with the latest fashion, be like beckham, kiss the queens brown ring and pray to parliament.... long live Iran, warts and all.
jancrowb 3 weeks ago
@unoxonien I am a nurse I have a 1st degree bsc (hons) and I am working toward my masters believe it or not it's has alot of science, so fuck you
nurseyjon 3 weeks ago
The Guardian is just as biased as The Daily Mail ...if not more so. Both of the are shocking propaganda machines disguised as independent journalism...
ndjm00 3 weeks ago
The irony of IQ tests and the Right XD.
HybridD91 3 weeks ago
alert the media! there was something true in The Daily Mail! Isn't that one of the portents of the Apocalypse?
EmmaDelamare 3 weeks ago
I smell a Troll at the Daily Mail
bismarket 3 weeks ago
It's funny, but it always seemed to me that Social Conservatism is Tribalism in a Suit; Social Conservatives are always operating under the aegis of tribalism, "us vs. them", etc. Actually, a nurse recently told me that this was the case - this is the first time that I've heard a scientific basis for this view :)
Klingschor 3 weeks ago 16
@Klingschor Not disagreeing (or agreeing) with your observation, but I'll point out that a nurse saying something is not by any of those definitions "scientific"; it's barely a "basis". Please don't say things like this, that imply science is something it is not.
UnOxonien 3 weeks ago
@UnOxonien
I don't think you understood my comment - I said that a nurse said this was the case, HOWEVER, the study that COUGHLAN cited was the first scientific evidence I've heard for this view (as opposed to an anecdote related by a nurse).
I hope that clarifies.
Klingschor 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A real opportunity to make part time income and share something really heathly with others.
No better satisfaction.
Go to >>> amazingautosystem.weebly.com <<< and sign on!
louisbrassyyy 3 weeks ago
Give me Something difficult to do! You say?
Ever tried shoving a wet noodle up a bobcats ass? Now that is difficult! And hours of fun. If you try please post results. Just to show these fuckwits what they look like.
pumpstations 3 weeks ago
The Daily Mail just published (a dozen days ago) an insane propaganda "article" by David Rose that claimed MET Office scientists said the exact opposite of what the scientists said. The scientists are very upset.
Desertphile 3 weeks ago
Clearly that can't be trusted.
Facts are biased towards us left-wingers.
Saaduk92 3 weeks ago
I'll give you a nickel to see your Eat a Queer Fetus for Jesus show. Five cents too much.
bigboy45454545 3 weeks ago
@mrshannonite As people age their views tend to.become more socially conservitive
MoMember88 3 weeks ago
The daily mail is to journalism what a cow pat is to chocolate mousse.
salamut2202 3 weeks ago 16
@salamut2202 Shit on me and call me a sundae! I believe your right :/
purpleprinc3 3 weeks ago
Can we take the Fox News staff and the Daily Mail staff, put them on a shuttle and fire them into the sun , please ?
gaglamesh731 3 weeks ago
what does that say about the people who THE SUN and DAILY STAR
ruthless6661 3 weeks ago
@ruthless6661 They are working class.
jaymthegenius 3 weeks ago
@jaymthegenius just cos ur working class dsnt make u a retard but reading right wing propaganda obviously does
ruthless6661 3 weeks ago
The Daily Mail. Ugh. What a fucking awful rag.
BriansBannister 3 weeks ago
I find the article to be very badly worded and misleading for a number of reasons (not a surprise considering it's source), the main one being the use of the term "right wing". Assuming it's simply using the Left-Right scale (which is obsolete) and not the Nolan Chart, it basically brands all right-wingers as extreme social conservatives. This puts me in a weird position because my economic views tend to throw me into the right wing, despire me being socially liberal and anti-prejudice.
northernvoxmedia 3 weeks ago
Question: have you ever craved to appear on the front of The Daily Mail dressed in your mother's bridal veil?
...sorry.
TheGzeus 3 weeks ago
If his gradady was a dumbss ,good chance is his grandkids aren't ! Southern proverb) !
steviebkhall 3 weeks ago
The psychotic man pronounces himself a doctor, examines himself, and diagnoses that he is insane "Dont believe him, i dont trust that guy"
grendelee 3 weeks ago
REICH wingers=STUPID,RELIGION ADDICTED,INDOCTRINATED,IDIOTIC!
TheAvaloth 3 weeks ago
@annoyed001 Is that you, Basil?!
jeffner1980 3 weeks ago
How do you confuse a daily mail reader? tell them that illegal immigrants kill paedophiles........boom...boom
annoyed001 3 weeks ago 2
Even a broken clock is right twice a day!
RDaneelOlivaw2 3 weeks ago
The original study was about SOCIAL conservatives, not necessarily conservative economics, IIRC.
That's obvious, because social conservatism is inherently bigoted.
Dragonuver 3 weeks ago
I have to admit that my old man is a Mail reader and it's quite sad how he has plummeted into these kinds of depths. Back in the day, just before I was born(1969) he was a peace loving hippy who hated the establishment, plus he has an IQ of about 130. What the fuck happened to him? What rotted his brain? I still bully him about his choice of toilet paper newspaper, I really do.
MrShannonite 3 weeks ago
I have the same pair of glasses.
91419 3 weeks ago
So how was intelligence tested I wonder?
nephthysuk 3 weeks ago
I see you have your own print version of Fox News. What a delight! Now you too can enjoy the rambling idiocy of the conservative right and save it in your attic to use as wrapping for fragile pieces when you die.
Meishayuri 3 weeks ago
Also, working class is synonymous with "stupid". This is unfortunate, since there are many bright working class individuals such as CoctopusPrime and Inmendham. How do I know they are working class? Their choice of words, accents, environments, and sense of style gives them away.
jaymthegenius 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
PompousPreacher 3 weeks ago
@PompousPreacher I'm surprised that they haven't offered him the chief editors position by now. He'd be perfect there.
elsparx 3 weeks ago
This is because the working class believes the sensationalism that right wing outlets engage in. Working class schools also don't teach critical thinking and analytical abilities whereas middle class and above schools emphasize the process of problem solving and analytical abilities. They also stress other kinds of intelligence other than memorizing facts by rote. I've heard that half of some schools are the vocational part! Business law in such schools is probably significantly downplayed.
jaymthegenius 3 weeks ago
Honesty is a redeeming feature.
Fangtorn 3 weeks ago
Innate intelligence, eh? Well there goes the idea that we can use rational argument and persuasion to raise peoples consciousnesses. I guess that leaves us no other option. Cull the stupid! It's clearly an idea who's time has come.
InvincibleIronyMan 3 weeks ago
"Atheist hate campaign led by Stephen Fry"
Not sure how that works... Stephen Fry is intelligent enough to respect religions rather than conduct a "hate campaign", what a load of bollocks.
Oh wait, daily mail. Explains it.
NewAccountFFS 3 weeks ago
Roughly 50% of people identify as "conservative" and 50% of people are below median intelligence. Coincidence?
fluffymcdeath 3 weeks ago
For the love of WHO...? *raised eyebrow* ;)
BionicDance 3 weeks ago
well if you have similar political views with that of ann widecombe you have to be pretty stupid
superstrok99 3 weeks ago
@superstrok99 I'd fuck Anne Widecombe silly.
Wait what?
NewAccountFFS 3 weeks ago
Have you noticed how 'controversial study' seems to mean 'may annoy some people'? It doesn't ever seems to mean the results are disputed in a scientific sense.
guitarpedant 3 weeks ago
Maybe they are trying to find out if their readers are actually reading there shit , would like to see their letters page after this it will be all uuurr ooo uuurr uurgh uuurgh faggot liberals uurgh .
woofalot13 3 weeks ago
Assuming the study is valid - at least they are being honest? Papers should ideally not refrain from news that don't support their reader-bases biases after all. I have my doubts given the source that these kind of strict journalistic principles was the reason it got printed - but if it was then hey, can't fault em for that...
TheStigma 3 weeks ago
@TheStigma I think someone is going to get a bollaking at the mail or sacked !
woofalot13 3 weeks ago
What is news paper ?
Realjhad 3 weeks ago
Fox news covered this; I forget who the personalities were it was a morning show. All they could come up with as a defense was, "well, what was their motivation for doing this study?" And, "Oh yeah, well conservative women are hotter." It was like catching someone lying and having them come back at you with, "well, why would you even check if I was lying?" They are making it too easy.
WilliamPbrane 3 weeks ago
Too funny
def44 3 weeks ago
I can't believe I'm saying this but it sounds very communist. It makes you wonder how much actual research for into these articles or if 'journalists' just regurgitate what they're fed. All the papers are batting for the same side just as all political parties are essentially the same. Everyone is equal but some are more equal than others (or otters as my predictive wanted to put) As the late great George Carlin once put, the only real choice you get is what flavour crisps/donut/drink you want.
def44 3 weeks ago
Ah, you just got to love the Daily Heil!!! Wouldn't wipe my arse with it!!!!!
kevinmc1 3 weeks ago
Ha ha Dick maybe your winning , that is a bit of stunner though the daly mail just admitting that the themselves are the paper of retards ha ha cant believe it too funny !
woofalot13 3 weeks ago
Before I ever actually read any articles from the Daily Mail, I always assumed its reputation was probably exaggerated... then I read some of their articles and realised there was no exaggeration at all. It's sad that there are enough backward-brained people in the country to keep such a publication in print.
andyfromsheldon 3 weeks ago
@andyfromsheldon Holy hell. I'd never actually read any articles either, but I just took a look, and wow... You're right.
They do a lot of fear mongering over there, apparently. That's the first thing that I noticed. I guess fearful people are easier to convince of stuff.
IncurableHeathen 3 weeks ago
"depression is the new trendy illness" ... right, cause everyone's that depressed is just faking it, they're not really depressed at all, they just love hating their lives, and hating themselves, and even sometimes wanting to die.
"Marijuana causes insanity"... really? really?... that must be why there are so many potheads that are perfectly fine mentally?
"End this Equal Rights madness"... Fuck you. End this Daily Mail madness
What is with ppl thinkin this is the 1950s?
ZERO9098767 3 weeks ago
Then...TDM is speaking to its readership as an equal.
thereforeithought 3 weeks ago
What i found really amusing is that the comments on the article prove the point the study is making. Amazing
drgoodvibesxxx 3 weeks ago
I never beleive the daily mail.... so what should I do about this article?
tyrongkojy 3 weeks ago
@tyrongkojy maybe its some kind of double bluff ?
woofalot13 3 weeks ago
Lol. The last picture just sums you the whole video. Have you been smoking any weed, Mr coughlan?
mikesheen741 3 weeks ago
A scientific study to prove that left-wing IQ's>right-wing IQ's? What's next? A sudy attempting to prove that it is darker at night than during the day? Peace.
mojosideburns 3 weeks ago
so fucking confused was this in the paper today? ill grab one from the shop if it is (i have never got one before but i need to shove it in a mates face), or is it just on there website
tmarritt 3 weeks ago
lol
ThatGuysSockAccount 3 weeks ago
'Women to be more equal than men' - possibly the most bafflingly stupid title I've ever heard
CammehYaBams 3 weeks ago 11
@CammehYaBams Lol, reminds me of 'All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.'
BenzieMusic 3 weeks ago
Did you read it in 3D Dick?
SouthTexasThrowdown 3 weeks ago
It's a wonderful day to be a socialist.
republicofsandles 3 weeks ago
@republicofsandles It's never a wonderful day to be a socialist.
mikesheen741 3 weeks ago
A good rule of thumb is not to believe a fucking word the Daily Mail prints but this threw me off slightly. I don't honestly know how to feel about this.
PlayingGilly 3 weeks ago 45
@PlayingGilly
I've resolved this issue by declaring the Daily Mail is so right wing that it discriminates even against itself. That it is so retarded that it doesn't possess any awareness when it declares it's own stupidity. Now I can sleep.
superhamzah85 3 weeks ago
@superhamzah85 Ha ha
woofalot13 3 weeks ago
@PlayingGilly Change Daily Mail for Mainstream Media.
enddebtslavery 3 weeks ago
@PlayingGilly The next step is to reject all newspapers and all radio and tv news channels.
EclecticSceptic 3 weeks ago
@PlayingGilly
It's kind of a "Norman" moment....
SiriusMined 3 weeks ago
@PlayingGilly Here's the full paper for free:
pss[dot]sagepub[dot]com/content/early/2012/01/04/0956797611421206.abstract
hal970fx 3 weeks ago
@hal970fx Cheers for the link, i'll take a look
PlayingGilly 3 weeks ago
My guess is that the Daily Mail's message wasn't "Well shucks, science says we conservatives are actually stupid. I guess that settles it, then!", but rather "Would you look at how unbelievably biased scientists are towards leftism! It's not enough for them to promote socialist ideas like climate change and evolution, now they just come up with a "study" that "proves" their side right. They're not even trying to hide their communist colours anymore!"
ConscientiousMind 3 weeks ago 40
@ConscientiousMind "It's not enough for them to promote socialist ideas like climate change and evolution," Are they really that stupid and deluded? You honestly think they associate poltics with proven science? Oh yeah, wait, i forgot. We are talking about the Daily Mail here.
pilgrimpater 3 weeks ago
@ConscientiousMind Having read it, I thought someone screwed up on editing. Someone from The Daily Mail is due to be fired soon >_>
1InboxToRuleThemAll 3 weeks ago
Also, didn't John Stuart Mill say: "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives."?
I hope the study quoted that when they published. Wouldn't be very scientific but too good not to do.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 3 weeks ago
This is absolutely priceless. The article and your commentary.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 3 weeks ago
Did you just nick those specs? LOL
AshManXP 3 weeks ago
Those glasses make you look deep man. Get it? LOOK DEEP! I'm such a dork :P
TheRepublicOfUngeria 3 weeks ago
A scientific study that states the obvious.
iCalintz 3 weeks ago
So if a persons IQ is 80 (which is about average these days) they believe in Adam ans Eve.
But if they rise to 90 god disappears in a puff of smoke.
dubldeka 3 weeks ago
@dubldeka
Nope. For something to disappear, it has to appear first.
lDrownded2 3 weeks ago
@lDrownded2 He appeared in the Daily Mail
dubldeka 3 weeks ago
@dubldeka 80 is average? Maybe for you but the actual 50th percentile is 100.
IKillBabyKittensLOL 3 weeks ago
@IKillBabyKittensLOL Your right, my IQ must be 50 and falling for attempting to use humour on a youtube comment.
dubldeka 3 weeks ago
I have (or had) an IQ of 136 (according to the WISC-tests, which are for children though, as I was 15 or so when they measured it), and I'm ashamed to say that I used to be a nationalist. But only until I was 20 years or so. Then, reason kicked in.
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 3 weeks ago
One of my University lecturers is an editorial illustrator and got a job for the Daily Mail. Apparently they specifically told him not to make the illustration too metaphorical or clever, because the readers wouldn't understand it. I don't think anyone was surprised.
PedanticPig 3 weeks ago
Far right fail and self-pwnage.
I hope my family reads that part and sees the irony.
Gunderson002 3 weeks ago
@Coughlan616 The daily mail is a right wing newspaper, yet they still printed that article? WOW! I wonder if they realize how they just insulted their own readers.
GargamelGold 3 weeks ago
I, for one, am deeply shocked. Where on earth do intellectual luminaries like AmetTriBlimpnugget and DanishGreatBallLicker fit into this? Their razor sharp deconstruction of geopolitics and wholehearted defence of their lack of pigmentation certainly suggests they are on the right. To suggest that, as this article most surely does, they are nothing but thick witted saliva factories seems to do them an injustice.
Dare I say it? Yes, I dare.
The Daily Mail must have got it wrong for once.
gabiotta 3 weeks ago
I have those same glasses... I wore them while watching you.
itsazy 3 weeks ago
This is like Fox News having a show called "Jeezus, Why are You watching this Shit, What's Wrong With You People".
lDrownded2 3 weeks ago
@lDrownded2 and then its watcher will claim its part of the liberal agenda.....
42Unknowns 3 weeks ago
@42Unknowns
Dou you wanna know when this liberal news media shit started? The Fifties when they were showing civil rights protesters getting attacked by dogs and McCarthy was being revealed for the scum bag he was. It got worse when the news started showing what the Viet Nam war I know it went through the Kennedy era, Liberalism is a set of principles, not a political party) really was. Then the voices got loader during Watergate through to Iran Contra and the Iraq War and its sequel.
lDrownded2 3 weeks ago
@lDrownded2
cont.: Everytime Con politicians get caught doing stupid shit they blame a Liberal agenda so that the information people are getting is automatically discounted as false. How exactly would a Liberal agenda help the corporations that show the news? If anything there is an entertainment agenda to the news.
lDrownded2 3 weeks ago
@lDrownded2 I know, i was trying to be sarcstic in my comment (and failed it would appears) as that those who even read the daily mail will turn against their own newspaper if they start showing info like in the video. people once in a narrow mind set they will ignore any contrasting evidence even if presented to them.
42Unknowns 3 weeks ago
That's a study bookmarked by me in ten secs or less to be used to piss off right winged morons from now on. Thanks for mentioning it Richard. Think i'll have great fun with that one:)
..and yeah.. The irony in this case is amazing..and funny:-)
jo05dk 3 weeks ago
If I'm not mistaken, Daily Mail is quoting a Livescience article that just came out recently...
I posted it on Yahoo Answers and the resident racists/bigots blamed the article on 'zionist propaganda' LOL.
UltraVert 3 weeks ago
"it's readers"... Come on "IT'S readers"...
Are grammar nazis right-wing or left-wing?
Knr911 3 weeks ago
Breaking news from the Daily Fail: Immigrants are taking our jobs, YET AGAIN
RonBurgundy161 3 weeks ago
The Daily Heil
dronespace 3 weeks ago
3D Glasses :D
cryosabrexXx 3 weeks ago
Great video. (:
HAL9000unit 3 weeks ago
Self Pwnage of the Right-Wing.. Still tastes as sweet!
2DRonaldo 3 weeks ago
the irony tastes real, real sweet.
T800System 3 weeks ago