This is very futuristic and environmentally friendly, and even better than most cars out there... But no matter what, I'll always take an ozone-burning beast over this.
i would never ever consider an EV if they cant design a sexy body style. why not not put on a deserved body - even if it adds weight?? Sales means more than gas mileage.
@Nsixtyfourlink Side note: I hate that youtube's comment system only works 1/2 the time no matter what browser I use. been trying to make a reply for a damn hour with "error try again" message.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Lol @ all the tree huggers here.
There's not one viable mass produced true EV in the world that I can go out and buy. Therefore, at this present time, internal combustion > electric motors.
Oh and don't even try and call the Toyota Prius a car. Just don't.
Not that a hybrid even counts as a proper EV anyway.
@hurrhurrbtard What rock have you been living under? Go to the Nissan web site and you can go buy an EV right now. Unfortunately for you, they're so popular you'll have to join a waiting list!
@hurrhurrbtard Actually, in the performance arena: electric motors > ICEs. Electric motors are MUCH more efficient, have MUCH better torque characteristics, cost less to manufacture and operate, and require MUCH less maintenance.
Driven by "tree huggers" or not, EVs will be vastly superior to ICE vehicles, in the every way, in the very near future.
@idontcare80 I'd beg to differ in the cost department. There's not one decent electric motor for less than $3500.00 and it's only 20-30 hp so unless you want to power a go-kart then make a better argument.
@71grandprix rc car racer and basher in the world are doing the job of buying this tecknologie,,so one day its gonna be cheaper for you to buy one!!!!!!
@hurrhurrbtard First of all, i can name at least 3 EV companies that are mass producing right now, Coda, Tesla, and Wheego. Second, a toyota prius is the worst excuse i have ever seen for a car.
@hurrhurrbtard First of all, i can name at least 3 EV companies that are mass producing right now, Coda, Tesla, and Wheego. Second, a toyota prius is the worst excuse i have ever seen for a car. Screw Hybrids
@celloprof I would rather use oil to make plastics for a car than to just burn the oil. It will never be able to be used again if burned. Plus, the electric car could be recharged from solar cells on the roof of the garage. I would love a torquey electic car.
the internal combustion engine works by controlled explosions which try in vain, for some mileage, to blow up the engine. that's one reason automakers hate them, there are so few repair bills that are gonna plague the electric vehicles. no doubt luxury loving soft, spoiled and fat Americans will demand tons 'o electronic toys, goodies to satisfy their childish need to return to mamma's womb, and get back home to have mommy fix them a nice glass of warm milk before beddy-by time.
thing is electric motors have nearing 100 percent torque to wheel horsepower. the infernal combustion engine is by far the most inefficient means to propel anything. that's why diesel locomotives are hybrids, using diesel petrol to generate the electricity, the only power delivery system with enough power to move anything that heavy. just starting a hundred car freight train would stall any number of diesels no matter how big. who knows how many puttputty chitty-chitty bang bangs you'd need.
@DThaeman so you want a car that starts accelerating the most when already at, let's say, 120mph? Or a car that instantly accelerates, at any rpm, but with a more realistic flat-out top speed?
yeah guzzling gas is oh just so hip. and murdering people in foreign countries to steal their oil, and keep the gas prices low causing global warmming too. you es un idiot mas grande de yo!
lookn4thepowpow : Excellent question! The emotors have no gears as they have full torque over the entire power band. Gears are in normal IC engined cars because they lack the torque and power! Added to that you have the weight of a gearbox linked to an inefficient power source. Something that needs to rev its guts out to get power. So emotors are more powerful, smaller, lighter and require no gearbox! Future ecars are all software controlled. No gearboxes.
those who say evs can go fast, try and make you Ferrari go 135mph electronically limited with one gear and have 0-60 time under 4 seconds. if you stick a few gears in an ev it would be just as fast
NoahXBloodyXNoah : Absolutely right. Sad fact that the perfected great sounding IC cars are utterly inefficient. It's like hanging on to horses and swearing the better fed ones will still be better and faster. They once thought that sending letters by stage coach would never be replaced by someting as idiotic as a telephone (not to mention VoIP etc). You'll always have hardliners. Oil and other lobbies will keep ic cars around for a while yet though.
@trident3b: Well, apparently, there are possible alternative fuel sources{and I mean really alternate}, that wouldn't require for IC to be completely replaced at all. One of these was actually tap water, and a process for that was invented by some guy in the early '90s , but I think he died way before his invention could really reach a huge audience.
We don't need oil and coal in Canada to produce electricty! We have dam,wind power,Necular and possibley tidal power.Gas cars are finally going to go away just like the chuck wagons did. Imagine millions of gas guzzlers replaced by clean cars and trucks. why even L.A. and bejing might actually see the sun again. And by the way millins of people won't be dieing from the sffects of smog.I just wish I was yoinger to see the change.
Id love it if they designed this EV to mimic the sound the Ferraris engine makes, and designed gears in it for the sheer pleasure of changing gears. Its not just about going fast, its about the experience of driving.
this video tries to show evs can keep up with the motorworld; its partially correct. Its top speed limits its victories to short races & there are faster feraris
we're better off with evs, but they should target the real source of polution: daily drivers, not weekend ferraris.
thats the same idea I had it plugs into computer and wene you hit the brake you get rubber sounds and and differint engin sounds you could make it sound like your going faster than you are lol.let your kid drive in the parking space no movment
That is until you put solar panels on your roof and never pay for power to run your EV ever again. I would say that you ether work in the oil business or you are the most ignorant and misinformed sucker on the planet, just the type of chump that big oil loves.
The efficiency of EVs, lack of fuel transport costs(in terms of energy), fewer stops in the fuel production chain, renewable options(solar, wind), etc. make EV's far more economical and ecological, with far less fossil fuel burned overall.
You use oil to make many of the parts for EV's, true, but that's true of any vehicle.
As mentioned, read the info, and do some independent research.
@toddyfex i charge my ev with the power from the sun usingg materials from scrapped cars and replaced household and industrial materials that were thrown away
watch the movie "Who killed the electric car" Car companies and oil companies are afraid of EV's. Also most people are afraid of change and aren't willing to make the switch, or are just to ignorant to even learn how much better EV's are.
It never ceases to amaze me how successful the big oil companies are at spreading there propaganda and miss information. They know that if the general public fully understood how much simpler and cheaper it is to deliver elec. for transportation instead of fuel, we would all switch over. Suddenly they would have nothing to sell us, and that for them could mean there demise.
As always there is a never ending line of people desperate to quote their high school science teacher to say "conservation of energy says, energy efficiency can never exceed 100%" that law is a linear equation and does not account for regeneration or the return of kinetic energy from a vehicles inertia back into a reusable form of energy. An EV with regen can travel DOUBLE the distance of an EV without regen yet the Ev without is 90% energy efficient. So you CAN have over 100% efficiency.
Car has max revs of 13000 rpm, two gears (high and low), with 100% of Torque availible at 1 rpm. Honda's first versions of the FCX (electric powered hydrogen fuel cell, which was leased to los angeles city for a year or two) had all 201 lbs/ft of torque instantly availible on demand. It was also about as big as the Fit. No need to rev the thing for torque....awesome.
tsport i think u r wrong,if the efficiency was 150% it would means that for 1 Watt it consume,it would give u back 1.5 Watt so u'll never need to recharge the battery!
For every 1 watt it consumes it regenerates .5 watt. It still consumes power at 150-200 watts a mile, but regeneration makes the original full charge last 50% longer. It's not perpetual motion mate!
Wow, let's see: so the car is 165 kW. 1 kW is 1,000 watts, and it consumes power at 150-200 watts a mile. 165 kW=165,000 watts, meaning, with that much power, you would only need to recharge the car every 820.5 miles for maximum watt consuming, and 1,100 miles for minimum watt consuming.
search MIT Carbon Nanotube Ultracapacitor Could Approach Storage Density of Batteries
300,000 cycle life and a power density greater than 100 kW/kg
That solves the battery replacement and toxic chemical problems. Caps charge really fast and can provide more power on demand so electric cars are going to get way faster then the EV is in this video.
ICE vs. EV races will become comedies soon. Ferrari? How quaint.
can i just say. thats great, but the thing with electric, even though the fuel is dead cheap, the car itself costs alot more but in the end you do save alot of money, because if you use it enough you could save yourself alot of money than buying normal fuel.
Well, the problem is all these people are building custom electrics designed to show off and outrace gas cars but they're way more powerful. A good consumer electric gets a couple hundred miles to a charge and costs about the same. Lionev has converted Ford Ranger pickups for like 30 kilodollars.
I agree. But I think there will always be a place for classic 'ICE' cars. Its not the 1967 Camaros and Ferraris that are the problem anyway, but the zillion practical daily drivers out there.
A petrol tank does hold more energy but a kilowatt of energy is about the same price be it liquid or electron, the real problem is how inefficient an ICE is at converting petrol to useable energy. It's barely better than an incandescent light bulb, about 15%. All the other 85% you've paid for is turned into USELESS HEAT! It's a fact, nothing you can do about it.
An EV can be 95% energy efficient and up to 150% when regeneration is used. So running an EV is 1/10 to 1/20 the cost of a petrol ICE
Nothing can be more than 100% efficient- high school physics. If something is more than 100% efficient- its a perpetual motion device. You are mistaken by adding energy efficiency of the motor and energy efficiency of regenerative braking- YOU CAN'T JUST ADD THEM to get overall efficiency!
Think of a vehicle as a flywheel energy storage device. The energy you apply to accelerate the vehicles inertia is only dissipated by friction, either air or mechanical. If you apply regenerative brakes to slow the vehicle you are recycling the energy you originally applied. If a static electric motor can be 95% efficient running in a steady state, then anything that regenerates it's own energy and reuses it over and over again is more than 100% +
They teach you about Newton in High School? You might want to re-study Newton's first law: law of inertia again. FYI 150% energy efficiency is not perpetual motion, perpetual is defined as infinite! 1.5 times anything is hardly infinite pal.
Go back to school. If the engine is 95% efficient, and regen is (for example) 85% efficient, then the total efficiency of getting the energy to drive-train and recovering it back is 0.95 x 0.85 = 0.80, or 80% (not counting losses in gears etc)! You don't ADD THEM UP! This is a mistake typically made by 8th grade students. Be careful naming me a naysayer- unlike you I do have a university degree in physics. Though I don't need one to address such a basic problem! And keep Newton out of it.
Another example of something that is more then 100% efficient, geothermal heating/cooling. For every unit of electricity the system uses, it provides four units of heating energy, giving a geothermal system a 400% efficiency rating on average, as quoted directly from several Geo websites. No tell me that it can't be possible!
you don't understand the concept of efficiency- nothing is more than 100% efficient, if your numbers come up with more than 100%, you're leaving something out of the equation. I don't know the numbers to calculate myself, and your 400% may be how much energy you get vs. how much YOU put in, but that's not efficiency, that's something else...
Newton's first law of motion states "An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force." Objects tend to "keep on doing what they're doing." In fact, it is the natural tendency of objects to resist changes in their state of motion. This tendency to resist changes in their state of motion is described as inertia.
Let me make it simple. Once you accelerate a mass (1 ton car) the only energy dissipated is via air or mechanical friction. Using an electric motor for regenerative braking to slow the 1 ton mass you are collecting what is left of the originally energy applied minus friction losses. I an EV is 90% efficient just driving down the road without regen (i.e DC EVs) then you get over 100% with regen.
A regular gas car just converts all that kinetic energy into heat via friction brakes.
Hey, tsport100, any chance I can go wherever you are and shoot these races with something better than whatever was used for this? You did a fine job (if you shot it), but the video is just so compressed it's difficult to see. Plus, I'd love to see that car up close. It would be wild.
That's a Myth! There's no actual proof that car ever existed and is was certainly never patented. From the description it sounds more like a Moray device than Tesla. Good idea but until someone demonstrates it works it's just a myth.
Are you THICK?? I instantly know about that obscure car you refer to and how it 'in theory' works, what does that tell you about how much I already know about Tesla.
Than,efficiency doesn't mean power,they are two very different things (Jet engines have 35% at max).So the efficiency is not important in performance,it's important in saving energy.
The advantage of an electric engine is that it has the same torque all over the rpm range,and,with the same power,it has much much more torque than a petrol engine.
dude i think i have figured out a way to make an electric car that will do 1340mph and the battery will last 10 mins aND IM 12 SO THINK HOW U COULD DO THAT CUS I CAN OH AND COOL VID
Lets say my car produces 280hp at the Crank, as in the engine itself produces it. Thats somewhere around 240 horsepower at the wheels(which move the car when combined with torque). Soo where was this magical 15% total engine power?
Simple, a petrol ICE is at best 25% energy efficient.. that's a fact, look it up anywhere! Then subtract from that a further 30-40% in drive train losses (that is the actual measured difference between flywheel and rear wheel power) and you get an average of 15%.
All that heat an ICE and transmission generate?? That's waisted energy that you paid for at the pump!
Ok I agree with you EXCEPT for the 30-40% Drivetrain loss. Maybe cars back in the day where you had to turn the crank infront had that loss. Standard Drivetrain loss for RWD is 15%, standard Drivetrain loss is 18-22% in a AWD vehicle.
Fair enough, you're agreeing I'm right. My understanding after years of reading dyno sheets comparing between flywheel and rolling road dynos is RWD is 30% loss and 4WD are 40% loss. Obviously auto is higher loss than manual etc.
Even using your suggested trans loss figures it works out at 19.5 - 21.25% TOTAL efficiency at best, hardly a significant improvement/difference
Only about 15% of the energy from the fuel you put in your tank gets used to move your car down the road or run useful accessories, such as air conditioning. The rest of the energy is lost to engine and driveline inefficiencies and idling. Therefore, the potential to improve fuel efficiency with advanced technologies is enormous. With an Electric Car it costs just $2.00 per 100kms with MUCH more performance than with petrol at $20.00 per 100kms.
Craig the Cat! Another YouTube know all! The 15% was quoted from fueleconomy gov, the US governemnt web site.. If we're all wrong, what's the correct answer mate?
id rather be in the slower ferrari and enjoy that glorious soungtrack then be in a very fast milk float! they didnt show you how the electric car handled did they!
It's not a novelty u can buy electric sports car, theres already an electric sports car called Tesla that costs 92K. I want one so badly so i don't have to be gipped off by oil companies every time i fill up my car with gas.
Excellent. Just release it along with a hybrid version that takes BioDiesel, and one that takes BioEthanol.
Also, one that's a hybrid with a Hydrogen / Petrol engine like the BMW Hydrogen 7 would be nice. Add the ability to charge this from the regular mains - and voila.
Mass production coupled with high build quality and a trusted brand like Honda or Toyota can allow the manufacturing cost to plummett.
ha ha... well this is the new American muscle, efficient, electric and above all ecologically friendly. the new "EEE" of America. yes that was a lame attempt at humor, my bad.
I currently own a 27mpg car. I may consider getting rid of it and buy that eletric car or something else eletric. Cars like the Tzero featured in the video has environmental benefits (if charged from a sustainable power generation method i.e. solar, biodiesel, wind or hydro-eletric power) and has 4x more fun than the Ferrari 355 Berlinetta shown.
About those EV batteries that recharge in a few minutes... How much amp and voltage do you need to do that? I don't know about you, but 110v from my wall socket won't be able to recharge much in that time. Sure, I could wave around an umbrella during a lightning storm and hook it up to an EV with Lead Acid batteries and recharge within a matter of nanoseconds. Also, do they have the tendency to overheat? I'm all for electric power, it's just that these questions have been lingering for a while.
I believe the university of Illinois is perfecting a new kind of ultra-capacitor that uses carbon nanotubes to store energy with similar amperage of a lithium battery. The advantage of the C.N.T.Cs (Carbon Nano Tube Capacitor) is that it can be recharged within minuets or seconds. We'll be seeing these capacitors in handheld devices within a few years from now. I hope.
The Nanosafe and A123 systems Li-Ion batteries use nano technology and reduce charge times in the minutes range also. GM recently gave A123 a development contract to make automotive-class Li Ion batteries. Nano based Li-Ion batteries are avaliable now and can be made into large packs to run EVs, as with the tzero.
Exactly, because of that nano technology, battery's are now superiour!!! The only weak part of the EV's is now gone for good! ok 1 thing to do is getting the price low. but look. Those battery's have lots of potentional and if china is going to produce them..
damn i am waiting to fill my car with AMPS for few bucks. !
lol, i can't believe how many petrol heads have got sooo angry that a engine head icon car like the ferrari got it's a** kicked 4 TIMES by a quicker, more efficient and safer car. Because electricity does'nt explode when u put a spark to it!
Where ever the electricity comes from is not an issue. Read some articles from web about the load leveling on the grid. During night time 84% of all 200 million cars in US could be charged instead of wasting that energy.
Also the efficiency of electric propulsion is far more better than ICE. If the diesel is combusted in powerplant, transferred through grid to EVs and consumed. We can get 90 miles per gallon. Easily.
Sorry, nucklehead. Nuclear power generation leaves a lot of radioactive waste. This waste has to be disposed in a way that will not contaminate groundwater or food for tens of thousands of years. The disposal problem has yet to be solved. Nuclear power is an option but far from perfect.
Perhaps you're forgetting the small matter of spent uranium fuel rods that have a radioactive half life of 2.3 MILLION years. Steam isn't the 'by'-product it is THE product, used to run turbines.
The point is that the oil and automotive industries have been LYING for decades and continue to mind-**** us to make sure that we do not consider a reality beyond gas or diesel powered vehicles. Notice how these amazing events are not televised?? It's not because it's not real, but the people who pay for advertising and the broadcast owners don't want for us to wake up and "take the red pill."
I like all the morons trying to insult the electric car, go check what Americas military vehicles of the future are going to use, electric motors with batteries and a diesel generator. Deadly powerful SILENT tanks that can also power a camp if needed. Electric motors are the future, copper prices have skyrocketed, thats the only thing that sucks about the electric car.
yeah, the electric car is fast....for about 10 seconds, then the batteries die and its slow again, it has over 600 lbs of torque off the line, until the stored energy is gone.
The battery pack stores 50Kw/hours worth of juice AND regenerates electricity when you take your foot off the throttle. That's good for 480kms (300 miles) and it'll only cost you $5.00 to 'fill er up'. I count 4 times it beat the Ferrari, didn't look to be going any slower on the 4th run!
This is very futuristic and environmentally friendly, and even better than most cars out there... But no matter what, I'll always take an ozone-burning beast over this.
ROBLOXobama1337 6 months ago
Bring that yellow slug to the 24 Hours of Le Mans and see how it does.
charbilly2005 9 months ago
cheap ass camera
LOPEZ1562 10 months ago
i dont know why there even seems to be a discussion about it?
combustion engine (petrol) = man
combustion engine (diesel) = woman
electric engine = nazi jew communist transvestite
stoneeh 11 months ago
I'm gonna get my violin out and play a sad song for that ferrari. It doesn't have a chance against the T-Zero.
HoboGus 1 year ago
Thanks for this video! Make it electric!
luc59457 1 year ago
i would never ever consider an EV if they cant design a sexy body style. why not not put on a deserved body - even if it adds weight?? Sales means more than gas mileage.
radrcer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy machine , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the
revolution!
hungarylnnjsd 1 year ago
Bad video quality makes me rage. other wise its just OK.
Nsixtyfourlink 1 year ago
@Nsixtyfourlink Side note: I hate that youtube's comment system only works 1/2 the time no matter what browser I use. been trying to make a reply for a damn hour with "error try again" message.
Nsixtyfourlink 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lol @ all the tree huggers here.
There's not one viable mass produced true EV in the world that I can go out and buy. Therefore, at this present time, internal combustion > electric motors.
Oh and don't even try and call the Toyota Prius a car. Just don't.
Not that a hybrid even counts as a proper EV anyway.
hurrhurrbtard 1 year ago
@hurrhurrbtard What rock have you been living under? Go to the Nissan web site and you can go buy an EV right now. Unfortunately for you, they're so popular you'll have to join a waiting list!
tsport100 1 year ago 14
@tsport100 I'd rather not get a nissan. Go for a tesla or coda
K2Jennerator 1 year ago
@tsport100 You are nuts EV's are a media event only. You might look at any road and check out the cars actually driving there.
drdeathkwp 1 year ago
@drdeathkwp Good on ya "Dr Death" LOL
Seeing is believing mate... the 200 hp EV in this video is virtually unbeatable off the line.. yet uses 1/10th the energy of the Ferrari.
Pure logic will tell anyone with more than 1/2 a brain that given such performance advantages, EVs are inevitable.
tsport100 1 year ago 10
@tsport100 what about water combustion engines
jackvincent90 5 months ago
@hurrhurrbtard Actually, in the performance arena: electric motors > ICEs. Electric motors are MUCH more efficient, have MUCH better torque characteristics, cost less to manufacture and operate, and require MUCH less maintenance.
Driven by "tree huggers" or not, EVs will be vastly superior to ICE vehicles, in the every way, in the very near future.
idontcare80 1 year ago
@idontcare80 I'd beg to differ in the cost department. There's not one decent electric motor for less than $3500.00 and it's only 20-30 hp so unless you want to power a go-kart then make a better argument.
71grandprix 1 year ago
@71grandprix rc car racer and basher in the world are doing the job of buying this tecknologie,,so one day its gonna be cheaper for you to buy one!!!!!!
rckrackedup 9 months ago
@hurrhurrbtard First of all, i can name at least 3 EV companies that are mass producing right now, Coda, Tesla, and Wheego. Second, a toyota prius is the worst excuse i have ever seen for a car.
K2Jennerator 1 year ago
@hurrhurrbtard First of all, i can name at least 3 EV companies that are mass producing right now, Coda, Tesla, and Wheego. Second, a toyota prius is the worst excuse i have ever seen for a car. Screw Hybrids
K2Jennerator 1 year ago
I just can wait till I can afford an EV Sports car in, lets say, 5 years time.
NearTheLimits 1 year ago
@celloprof I would rather use oil to make plastics for a car than to just burn the oil. It will never be able to be used again if burned. Plus, the electric car could be recharged from solar cells on the roof of the garage. I would love a torquey electic car.
JordyBrisbin 1 year ago
the ferrari is almost 24 year old dumb ass
reoxex 1 year ago
the internal combustion engine works by controlled explosions which try in vain, for some mileage, to blow up the engine. that's one reason automakers hate them, there are so few repair bills that are gonna plague the electric vehicles. no doubt luxury loving soft, spoiled and fat Americans will demand tons 'o electronic toys, goodies to satisfy their childish need to return to mamma's womb, and get back home to have mommy fix them a nice glass of warm milk before beddy-by time.
pvelectric 2 years ago
you can see the electric car top out and the Ferrari start to pull ahead.. thats when they stopped the race LOL
they're so biased!
DThaeman 2 years ago
thing is electric motors have nearing 100 percent torque to wheel horsepower. the infernal combustion engine is by far the most inefficient means to propel anything. that's why diesel locomotives are hybrids, using diesel petrol to generate the electricity, the only power delivery system with enough power to move anything that heavy. just starting a hundred car freight train would stall any number of diesels no matter how big. who knows how many puttputty chitty-chitty bang bangs you'd need.
pvelectric 2 years ago
@DThaeman so you want a car that starts accelerating the most when already at, let's say, 120mph? Or a car that instantly accelerates, at any rpm, but with a more realistic flat-out top speed?
ivaniclixx 1 year ago
I'm an old-fashioned conservative, and I think it is stupid to drive anything that fast.
pvelectric 2 years ago 2
you are truely an idiot... are you one of those lunatics who doesnt understand why they make a car that can go faster than the speed limit?
conservatives are dying off.. you guys are way too uptight.. its not a good thing to be uptight
DThaeman 2 years ago
yeah guzzling gas is oh just so hip. and murdering people in foreign countries to steal their oil, and keep the gas prices low causing global warmming too. you es un idiot mas grande de yo!
pvelectric 2 years ago
@pvelectric
show me one barrel of oil we have taken from the Iraq war.
Nsixtyfourlink 1 year ago
But is the gearing the same vs hp?
lookn4thepowpow 2 years ago
lookn4thepowpow : Excellent question! The emotors have no gears as they have full torque over the entire power band. Gears are in normal IC engined cars because they lack the torque and power! Added to that you have the weight of a gearbox linked to an inefficient power source. Something that needs to rev its guts out to get power. So emotors are more powerful, smaller, lighter and require no gearbox! Future ecars are all software controlled. No gearboxes.
trident3b 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
Nsixtyfourlink 1 year ago
Power is more important than sound! At least I would hear my radio better!! lol!
DRSmetal 2 years ago 14
I highly agree :D
ZeF2007inc 2 years ago
What's so amazing is the way the electric car makes it look so effortless!
Zlyzer 3 years ago 6
Beautiful sound from the Ferrari though
aroundtheworls 3 years ago 3
not really that much of a ferrari though, but nice electric car
julingy 3 years ago
those who say evs can go fast, try and make you Ferrari go 135mph electronically limited with one gear and have 0-60 time under 4 seconds. if you stick a few gears in an ev it would be just as fast
niteryder50 3 years ago
I have to say I love the sound of the Ferrari but its like using a sword. Love the past but you also need too except that its the past.
NoahXBloodyXNoah 3 years ago
NoahXBloodyXNoah : Absolutely right. Sad fact that the perfected great sounding IC cars are utterly inefficient. It's like hanging on to horses and swearing the better fed ones will still be better and faster. They once thought that sending letters by stage coach would never be replaced by someting as idiotic as a telephone (not to mention VoIP etc). You'll always have hardliners. Oil and other lobbies will keep ic cars around for a while yet though.
trident3b 2 years ago 2
@trident3b: Well, apparently, there are possible alternative fuel sources{and I mean really alternate}, that wouldn't require for IC to be completely replaced at all. One of these was actually tap water, and a process for that was invented by some guy in the early '90s , but I think he died way before his invention could really reach a huge audience.
Also, check out hempcar{dot}com .
SanFran90 2 years ago
We don't need oil and coal in Canada to produce electricty! We have dam,wind power,Necular and possibley tidal power.Gas cars are finally going to go away just like the chuck wagons did. Imagine millions of gas guzzlers replaced by clean cars and trucks. why even L.A. and bejing might actually see the sun again. And by the way millins of people won't be dieing from the sffects of smog.I just wish I was yoinger to see the change.
marksixtyone 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the nuclear will blow up canada eh
badboyforlife10195 3 years ago
Id love it if they designed this EV to mimic the sound the Ferraris engine makes, and designed gears in it for the sheer pleasure of changing gears. Its not just about going fast, its about the experience of driving.
this video tries to show evs can keep up with the motorworld; its partially correct. Its top speed limits its victories to short races & there are faster feraris
we're better off with evs, but they should target the real source of polution: daily drivers, not weekend ferraris.
moonlitegram 3 years ago
thats the same idea I had it plugs into computer and wene you hit the brake you get rubber sounds and and differint engin sounds you could make it sound like your going faster than you are lol.let your kid drive in the parking space no movment
sirlonghair 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yeah but it really doesnt matter because you need oil and coal to produce electricity so an electric car doesnt help anybody
toddyfex 3 years ago
That's THE most ignorant agument agains EVs. Read the "more info" section on this video!
tsport100 3 years ago 5
That is until you put solar panels on your roof and never pay for power to run your EV ever again. I would say that you ether work in the oil business or you are the most ignorant and misinformed sucker on the planet, just the type of chump that big oil loves.
GSpotter63 3 years ago
The efficiency of EVs, lack of fuel transport costs(in terms of energy), fewer stops in the fuel production chain, renewable options(solar, wind), etc. make EV's far more economical and ecological, with far less fossil fuel burned overall.
You use oil to make many of the parts for EV's, true, but that's true of any vehicle.
As mentioned, read the info, and do some independent research.
withindarkness 3 years ago
@toddyfex hahaha..... man, u shold go to a doctor... a psychiatrist
xD Read man, read ! I see most of new modern-f**khead generations DOESN'T WANT TO READ ! Well, probably that's why you're writing stupidities :P
No offense, just a constructive remark !
sahaja75 1 year ago
@toddyfex i charge my ev with the power from the sun usingg materials from scrapped cars and replaced household and industrial materials that were thrown away
NeeKroVal 1 year ago
I think it would be a good idea to say that the efficiency is only 150% as claimed WHILE using the regenerative breaking.
Meeetch22 3 years ago
There you go, by your own ignorance and lack of correct information, you have proven the success of big oil propaganda.
GSpotter63 3 years ago
watch the movie "Who killed the electric car" Car companies and oil companies are afraid of EV's. Also most people are afraid of change and aren't willing to make the switch, or are just to ignorant to even learn how much better EV's are.
stiffman320 3 years ago
It never ceases to amaze me how successful the big oil companies are at spreading there propaganda and miss information. They know that if the general public fully understood how much simpler and cheaper it is to deliver elec. for transportation instead of fuel, we would all switch over. Suddenly they would have nothing to sell us, and that for them could mean there demise.
GSpotter63 3 years ago
lol he got spanked.
thetechnician22 3 years ago
would be nice to see this car on the Top Gear test track in the UK , and let the stig do a lap .
fusionfreq 3 years ago
100 grand for the tesla roadster:(
commando7144 3 years ago
that Ferrari 355 isnt the fastest Ferrari out there, but still that electrical thing is AMAZING!!! i would do anything for one of those!
classicbrandon 3 years ago 4
wat is the average price range for one of these tzeros?
Thatzacguy 3 years ago
Not for sale! Only three prototype tzeros were ever built but the Tesla Roadster is basically a production version of the tzero.
tsport100 3 years ago
As always there is a never ending line of people desperate to quote their high school science teacher to say "conservation of energy says, energy efficiency can never exceed 100%" that law is a linear equation and does not account for regeneration or the return of kinetic energy from a vehicles inertia back into a reusable form of energy. An EV with regen can travel DOUBLE the distance of an EV without regen yet the Ev without is 90% energy efficient. So you CAN have over 100% efficiency.
tsport100 3 years ago
Car has max revs of 13000 rpm, two gears (high and low), with 100% of Torque availible at 1 rpm. Honda's first versions of the FCX (electric powered hydrogen fuel cell, which was leased to los angeles city for a year or two) had all 201 lbs/ft of torque instantly availible on demand. It was also about as big as the Fit. No need to rev the thing for torque....awesome.
j1j2k3k4 3 years ago
tsport i think u r wrong,if the efficiency was 150% it would means that for 1 Watt it consume,it would give u back 1.5 Watt so u'll never need to recharge the battery!
vince100times 4 years ago
I'm not wrong, you just can't add.
For every 1 watt it consumes it regenerates .5 watt. It still consumes power at 150-200 watts a mile, but regeneration makes the original full charge last 50% longer. It's not perpetual motion mate!
tsport100 4 years ago
Wow, let's see: so the car is 165 kW. 1 kW is 1,000 watts, and it consumes power at 150-200 watts a mile. 165 kW=165,000 watts, meaning, with that much power, you would only need to recharge the car every 820.5 miles for maximum watt consuming, and 1,100 miles for minimum watt consuming.
Revenge33 4 years ago
No mate, 165kw is the peak output power of the motor. The battery pack in this car is 50kw/hrs.
50kw/hr /150wh mi = 333 miles range! 300 miles or 480 kms is the range they quote for the tzero.
tsport100 4 years ago
damn that little shit is fast!
batterbee2000 4 years ago 4
Fossil fuels are fossils!!
znarf541 4 years ago 17
I dunno if I could get into silent drag races =(
nwcafesurfer 4 years ago
I hear you! I know electric cars or at least hybrids are the wave of the future, but drag racing would not be the same without the noise.
BogusCraft 3 years ago
If you want noise go to an airport! LOL
tsport100 3 years ago
Thx for video, i was enjoing in ferrari sound..Una bella macina...forza ferrari
dejannnnnnnn 4 years ago
To easy!!!!!
normellow 4 years ago
search MIT Carbon Nanotube Ultracapacitor Could Approach Storage Density of Batteries
300,000 cycle life and a power density greater than 100 kW/kg
That solves the battery replacement and toxic chemical problems. Caps charge really fast and can provide more power on demand so electric cars are going to get way faster then the EV is in this video.
ICE vs. EV races will become comedies soon. Ferrari? How quaint.
abram730 4 years ago 5
can i just say. thats great, but the thing with electric, even though the fuel is dead cheap, the car itself costs alot more but in the end you do save alot of money, because if you use it enough you could save yourself alot of money than buying normal fuel.
dogmanishomosexual 4 years ago
Well, the problem is all these people are building custom electrics designed to show off and outrace gas cars but they're way more powerful. A good consumer electric gets a couple hundred miles to a charge and costs about the same. Lionev has converted Ford Ranger pickups for like 30 kilodollars.
cyborgtroy 4 years ago
thats awesome... and im guessing the electric is cheaper then the ferrari! im interested :P
petro000 4 years ago
Cheaper to buy AND run!!
The Ferrari costs $30.00 per 100 km.
The EV = $1.00 per 100 km.
tsport100 4 years ago
Imagine how amazing electric cars would be these days if they had the same amount of money invested in them as fuel powered cars.
JakesArnoose 4 years ago 3
The days of the ICE age cars are numbered.
Peak Oil, Global Warming, Air Pollution...and now they're more expensive to run and slower than EV cars.
ruckrover8 4 years ago 6
I agree. But I think there will always be a place for classic 'ICE' cars. Its not the 1967 Camaros and Ferraris that are the problem anyway, but the zillion practical daily drivers out there.
wihargo 4 years ago
Electric Motor is clearly superior to the combustion engine.
Sc0rPsX 4 years ago
definitely more efficient and flexible,trouble is a petrol tank holds more power than a battery.
chrisbhackett 4 years ago
A petrol tank does hold more energy but a kilowatt of energy is about the same price be it liquid or electron, the real problem is how inefficient an ICE is at converting petrol to useable energy. It's barely better than an incandescent light bulb, about 15%. All the other 85% you've paid for is turned into USELESS HEAT! It's a fact, nothing you can do about it.
An EV can be 95% energy efficient and up to 150% when regeneration is used. So running an EV is 1/10 to 1/20 the cost of a petrol ICE
tsport100 4 years ago
Nothing can be more than 100% efficient- high school physics. If something is more than 100% efficient- its a perpetual motion device. You are mistaken by adding energy efficiency of the motor and energy efficiency of regenerative braking- YOU CAN'T JUST ADD THEM to get overall efficiency!
TheBishopSSR 4 years ago
Naysayers, it's so repetitive.
Think of a vehicle as a flywheel energy storage device. The energy you apply to accelerate the vehicles inertia is only dissipated by friction, either air or mechanical. If you apply regenerative brakes to slow the vehicle you are recycling the energy you originally applied. If a static electric motor can be 95% efficient running in a steady state, then anything that regenerates it's own energy and reuses it over and over again is more than 100% +
tsport100 4 years ago
They teach you about Newton in High School? You might want to re-study Newton's first law: law of inertia again. FYI 150% energy efficiency is not perpetual motion, perpetual is defined as infinite! 1.5 times anything is hardly infinite pal.
tsport100 4 years ago
Go back to school. If the engine is 95% efficient, and regen is (for example) 85% efficient, then the total efficiency of getting the energy to drive-train and recovering it back is 0.95 x 0.85 = 0.80, or 80% (not counting losses in gears etc)! You don't ADD THEM UP! This is a mistake typically made by 8th grade students. Be careful naming me a naysayer- unlike you I do have a university degree in physics. Though I don't need one to address such a basic problem! And keep Newton out of it.
TheBishopSSR 4 years ago
Do you actual read what you type?
You Start with 95% add regeneration and end up with total system efficiency of 80%. What a fucking idiot.
You clearly have no idea. That doesn't come close to explaining reality which is that 'Coast' regen can extend range by up to 50%.
tsport100 4 years ago
Another example of something that is more then 100% efficient, geothermal heating/cooling. For every unit of electricity the system uses, it provides four units of heating energy, giving a geothermal system a 400% efficiency rating on average, as quoted directly from several Geo websites. No tell me that it can't be possible!
tsport100 4 years ago
you don't understand the concept of efficiency- nothing is more than 100% efficient, if your numbers come up with more than 100%, you're leaving something out of the equation. I don't know the numbers to calculate myself, and your 400% may be how much energy you get vs. how much YOU put in, but that's not efficiency, that's something else...
AffluentLiberal 3 years ago
Brilliant technical appraisal there! "something else" LOL
Newton's first law of motion states "An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force." Objects tend to "keep on doing what they're doing." In fact, it is the natural tendency of objects to resist changes in their state of motion. This tendency to resist changes in their state of motion is described as inertia.
tsport100 3 years ago
Let me make it simple. Once you accelerate a mass (1 ton car) the only energy dissipated is via air or mechanical friction. Using an electric motor for regenerative braking to slow the 1 ton mass you are collecting what is left of the originally energy applied minus friction losses. I an EV is 90% efficient just driving down the road without regen (i.e DC EVs) then you get over 100% with regen.
A regular gas car just converts all that kinetic energy into heat via friction brakes.
tsport100 3 years ago
Hey, tsport100, any chance I can go wherever you are and shoot these races with something better than whatever was used for this? You did a fine job (if you shot it), but the video is just so compressed it's difficult to see. Plus, I'd love to see that car up close. It would be wild.
beatusmongous 4 years ago
Man, that thing sounds like it's spinning its tires throughout the whole run. That thing is wicked fast!
beatusmongous 4 years ago
good for up here top end aus no speed limit go as fast as your car can handle...
danardz 4 years ago
search the internet for tesla's pierce arrow. tesla's car did not use batterys. he transfered power wireless.
fordgt1000 4 years ago
That's a Myth! There's no actual proof that car ever existed and is was certainly never patented. From the description it sounds more like a Moray device than Tesla. Good idea but until someone demonstrates it works it's just a myth.
tsport100 4 years ago
they also said the earth was flat.
fordgt1000 4 years ago
Go and build it then!! Put your money where your mouth is.
tsport100 4 years ago
tesla = modern world, do some research. alot of his work is still classifed. watch some videos on him.
fordgt1000 4 years ago
Are you THICK?? I instantly know about that obscure car you refer to and how it 'in theory' works, what does that tell you about how much I already know about Tesla.
tsport100 4 years ago
So, what's the top speed on this? Probably not very high.
StreeTRacR008 4 years ago
Top speed 112mph (electronically limited)
Which is well beyond any legal speed limit I'm aware of.
tsport100 4 years ago
Legal...haha
StreeTRacR008 4 years ago
sorry how much cost the electric implant?
Animapivot 4 years ago
yes,right.
The only thing you loose with electrical engines is the sound.(not irrelevant to me,but absolutely pointless if compared with ecological themes.
emadelta86 4 years ago
Than,efficiency doesn't mean power,they are two very different things (Jet engines have 35% at max).So the efficiency is not important in performance,it's important in saving energy.
emadelta86 4 years ago
So you get 2 hits for the price of 1, better performance at a cheaper price.
tsport100 4 years ago
The advantage of an electric engine is that it has the same torque all over the rpm range,and,with the same power,it has much much more torque than a petrol engine.
emadelta86 4 years ago
dude i think i have figured out a way to make an electric car that will do 1340mph and the battery will last 10 mins aND IM 12 SO THINK HOW U COULD DO THAT CUS I CAN OH AND COOL VID
hpihooligan 4 years ago
is that horse hoof s i hear in the sound?
kcipeht 4 years ago
No, that's APPLAUSE! Get better speakers!
MARKETEX 4 years ago
The sound is the tires going over the joints in the concrete.
ccoraxfan 4 years ago
compared to the elec-car that faerrari is a peace of She it.
olmosm1 4 years ago
talk about braking an axel shaft!
nexus2l 4 years ago
Lets say my car produces 280hp at the Crank, as in the engine itself produces it. Thats somewhere around 240 horsepower at the wheels(which move the car when combined with torque). Soo where was this magical 15% total engine power?
craigthecat 4 years ago
Simple, a petrol ICE is at best 25% energy efficient.. that's a fact, look it up anywhere! Then subtract from that a further 30-40% in drive train losses (that is the actual measured difference between flywheel and rear wheel power) and you get an average of 15%.
All that heat an ICE and transmission generate?? That's waisted energy that you paid for at the pump!
tsport100 4 years ago
Ok I agree with you EXCEPT for the 30-40% Drivetrain loss. Maybe cars back in the day where you had to turn the crank infront had that loss. Standard Drivetrain loss for RWD is 15%, standard Drivetrain loss is 18-22% in a AWD vehicle.
craigthecat 4 years ago
Fair enough, you're agreeing I'm right. My understanding after years of reading dyno sheets comparing between flywheel and rolling road dynos is RWD is 30% loss and 4WD are 40% loss. Obviously auto is higher loss than manual etc.
Even using your suggested trans loss figures it works out at 19.5 - 21.25% TOTAL efficiency at best, hardly a significant improvement/difference
tsport100 4 years ago
Yeah, great. Ferrari for me please.
logwind 4 years ago
Only about 15% of the energy from the fuel you put in your tank gets used to move your car down the road or run useful accessories, such as air conditioning. The rest of the energy is lost to engine and driveline inefficiencies and idling. Therefore, the potential to improve fuel efficiency with advanced technologies is enormous. With an Electric Car it costs just $2.00 per 100kms with MUCH more performance than with petrol at $20.00 per 100kms.
tsport100 4 years ago
15%, yeah your wrong.
craigthecat 4 years ago
Craig the Cat! Another YouTube know all! The 15% was quoted from fueleconomy gov, the US governemnt web site.. If we're all wrong, what's the correct answer mate?
tsport100 4 years ago
id rather be in the slower ferrari and enjoy that glorious soungtrack then be in a very fast milk float! they didnt show you how the electric car handled did they!
sparky0506 4 years ago
Walk quietly but carry a big stick!
tsport100 4 years ago
im all for electric cars. But im with sparky on this one. I like the grunt and growl of motors.
Im going to miss gasoline cars in the future. But electric cars are necessary for many reasons.
They should install artifical noise makers in the sports electric cars to bring back that old time grunt
moonlitegram 4 years ago
simpler is better
blazerblast 4 years ago
fuck u carrera eletric ftw!!!
derg12345 4 years ago
Its nice... but nothing can replace the sound of a good old benzin-engine... :-)))
Sanyey 4 years ago
so get a tape recorder and some speakers ;) Perfect for when our oil runs out
ImYourLastResort 4 years ago
pity electric cars make no noise
felix4877 4 years ago
I think it's not a pity, but rather extremely cool! Being cool without being a cheap poser who likes to annoy neighbors with noisy burnouts.
TheBishopSSR 4 years ago
It's not a novelty u can buy electric sports car, theres already an electric sports car called Tesla that costs 92K. I want one so badly so i don't have to be gipped off by oil companies every time i fill up my car with gas.
lood123 4 years ago
Excellent. Just release it along with a hybrid version that takes BioDiesel, and one that takes BioEthanol.
Also, one that's a hybrid with a Hydrogen / Petrol engine like the BMW Hydrogen 7 would be nice. Add the ability to charge this from the regular mains - and voila.
Mass production coupled with high build quality and a trusted brand like Honda or Toyota can allow the manufacturing cost to plummett.
RulerRyze 4 years ago
to bad money owns the world.. i mean this will never be more then a novelty untill oil is gone. =(
sos687 4 years ago
haha..good by and good ridance to ''american muscle''.
tselegala 4 years ago
ha ha... well this is the new American muscle, efficient, electric and above all ecologically friendly. the new "EEE" of America. yes that was a lame attempt at humor, my bad.
aliesneo 4 years ago
ferrari's are italian and don't fall into the american muscle category.
moonlitegram 4 years ago
yes beatiful but with electric you make 30 km and after you have to wait 6 hours to recharge the battery
domanialmare 4 years ago
Oh it's an Italian thing! More like 500km between charges and 10 mins to recharge. I'm afraid your beloved Ferrari is a relic.
tsport100 4 years ago
F355 Berlinetta is one of the slowest Ferrari's models. But still a good move by EV.
fatih737 4 years ago
does'n matter EV's are will not be the thing of the future anymore they will soon be the thing of the present
corado21 4 years ago
I currently own a 27mpg car. I may consider getting rid of it and buy that eletric car or something else eletric. Cars like the Tzero featured in the video has environmental benefits (if charged from a sustainable power generation method i.e. solar, biodiesel, wind or hydro-eletric power) and has 4x more fun than the Ferrari 355 Berlinetta shown.
ROCKSOLID19 4 years ago
About those EV batteries that recharge in a few minutes... How much amp and voltage do you need to do that? I don't know about you, but 110v from my wall socket won't be able to recharge much in that time. Sure, I could wave around an umbrella during a lightning storm and hook it up to an EV with Lead Acid batteries and recharge within a matter of nanoseconds. Also, do they have the tendency to overheat? I'm all for electric power, it's just that these questions have been lingering for a while.
DeLorean4 4 years ago
Check out the Altairnano web site to answer your questions!
tsport100 4 years ago
I believe the university of Illinois is perfecting a new kind of ultra-capacitor that uses carbon nanotubes to store energy with similar amperage of a lithium battery. The advantage of the C.N.T.Cs (Carbon Nano Tube Capacitor) is that it can be recharged within minuets or seconds. We'll be seeing these capacitors in handheld devices within a few years from now. I hope.
HAL11000 4 years ago
The Nanosafe and A123 systems Li-Ion batteries use nano technology and reduce charge times in the minutes range also. GM recently gave A123 a development contract to make automotive-class Li Ion batteries. Nano based Li-Ion batteries are avaliable now and can be made into large packs to run EVs, as with the tzero.
tsport100 4 years ago
Exactly, because of that nano technology, battery's are now superiour!!! The only weak part of the EV's is now gone for good! ok 1 thing to do is getting the price low. but look. Those battery's have lots of potentional and if china is going to produce them..
damn i am waiting to fill my car with AMPS for few bucks. !
Dilekz 4 years ago
lol, i can't believe how many petrol heads have got sooo angry that a engine head icon car like the ferrari got it's a** kicked 4 TIMES by a quicker, more efficient and safer car. Because electricity does'nt explode when u put a spark to it!
projectdaemon 4 years ago
Your All Wrong.
Where does electricity come from?
NUCLEAR Power stations.
FOSSIL Fuel burnign Power Stations.
etc,
How many Wind, Hydor or Solar Power Stations do you see in the good ole Unconscious Society of Anarchists
LAtexStretch 4 years ago
Where ever the electricity comes from is not an issue. Read some articles from web about the load leveling on the grid. During night time 84% of all 200 million cars in US could be charged instead of wasting that energy.
Also the efficiency of electric propulsion is far more better than ICE. If the diesel is combusted in powerplant, transferred through grid to EVs and consumed. We can get 90 miles per gallon. Easily.
mfb424 4 years ago
Neuclear power is extremely clean. The only by-product is steam.
jbakid 4 years ago
Sorry, nucklehead. Nuclear power generation leaves a lot of radioactive waste. This waste has to be disposed in a way that will not contaminate groundwater or food for tens of thousands of years. The disposal problem has yet to be solved. Nuclear power is an option but far from perfect.
JeffreyJaguar 4 years ago
JeffreyJaguar, we use our nuclear waste as bullets.
abram730 4 years ago
I agree
luckdufloripa 4 years ago
Perhaps you're forgetting the small matter of spent uranium fuel rods that have a radioactive half life of 2.3 MILLION years. Steam isn't the 'by'-product it is THE product, used to run turbines.
tsport100 4 years ago
The point is that the oil and automotive industries have been LYING for decades and continue to mind-**** us to make sure that we do not consider a reality beyond gas or diesel powered vehicles. Notice how these amazing events are not televised?? It's not because it's not real, but the people who pay for advertising and the broadcast owners don't want for us to wake up and "take the red pill."
tillmantube 4 years ago
Go ELECTRIC!
Skiiwa 4 years ago
This ISN'T the Tesla!!
BTW If you go flat strap in the Bugatti Veyron it'll empty it's 100 ltr fuel tank in 15 mins.
tsport100 5 years ago
I like all the morons trying to insult the electric car, go check what Americas military vehicles of the future are going to use, electric motors with batteries and a diesel generator. Deadly powerful SILENT tanks that can also power a camp if needed. Electric motors are the future, copper prices have skyrocketed, thats the only thing that sucks about the electric car.
outworld1 5 years ago
yeah, the electric car is fast....for about 10 seconds, then the batteries die and its slow again, it has over 600 lbs of torque off the line, until the stored energy is gone.
slater442w30 5 years ago
The battery pack stores 50Kw/hours worth of juice AND regenerates electricity when you take your foot off the throttle. That's good for 480kms (300 miles) and it'll only cost you $5.00 to 'fill er up'. I count 4 times it beat the Ferrari, didn't look to be going any slower on the 4th run!
tsport100 5 years ago
i dont understand what there trying to prove..
andyman009 5 years ago
they are dispelling the myth that an electric car can ever compete head-to-head against a gasoline powered vehicle...
electric motors are [5000%] 5x more efficent than the internal combustion engine... see physics 101 for details under thermodynamics...
terry1919 4 years ago
ok great race... now go to recharge batteries for others 12 hours..
ghigu333 5 years ago