The natural collapse would be the one that was burning for hours, had no explosive sounds and no explosive flashes at the moment of collapse. That would be number 4. Even though, deceptively, this person never showed the sound by either of these collpases. Because that would be a dead give away. By the way, WTC7 collapsed for the exact same reason as the substantial internal collapse of WTC5: Fires!
Connclusion: The person with the soundless laptop wasted his time with these street interviews.
The fact remains, A TALLER BUILDING IS WEAKER THAN A SHORTER ONE.
No Arrowhead, this is not true. Sorry to tell you, but just because you keep saying it doesn't make it true. In the real world there are things called building codes, and they specify that taller buildings have to be stronger than shorter ones. You should look it up one day while studying the three dimensions.
Actually you saw Buildings 1 and 2 hit Buildings 5 and 6, yet for some strange reason those shredded shells of buildings didn't collapse, only Building 7
"And the debris impact on the buildings was probably different in its own way."
Probably different? They were definitely different. Buildings 5 and 6 were thoroughly shredded by the collapses, and like you said they were smaller buildings, not as strong as Building 7. Number 7 was not severely damaged, it had minimal damage. Fires on a few floors and a lot of smoke. Yet it collapsed at freefall speed through the path of most resistance
"and like you said they were smaller buildings, not as strong as Building 7."
In the real world, taller buildings are weaker than shorter ones with the same footprint.
"Number 7 was not severely damaged, it had minimal damage. [...]"
You know that isn't true, but you keep telling yourself that because it makes your controlled demolition "theory" sound more credible (or at least less batshit).
"Yet it collapsed at freefall speed through the path of most resistance"
In the real world Arrowhead, taller buildings are a hell of a lot stronger than shorter buildings, and Building 7 had the added feature of being Giuliani's OEM Bunker, not to mention FBI, Secret Service and a host of other government offices. And your little line you threw in to sound educated in this field actually betrays your ignorance because taller buildings do not have the same footprint as smaller ones, there is no "with the same footprint." Are u saying Building 7 had the same footprint?
"Number 7 was not severely damaged, it had minimal damage. [...]"
You know that isn't true, but you keep telling yourself that because it makes your controlled demolition "theory" sound more credible (or at least less batshit).
"Yet it collapsed at freefall speed through the path of most resistance"
Really? How do you figure?"
Please show me one proof of substantial damage to Building 7 that would cause it to fall at freefall speed. How do I figure that? It's called the scientifc method.
"In the real world Arrowhead, taller buildings are a hell of a lot stronger than shorter buildings"
Nope. Say it all you want, it won't make it true.
Taller buildings *have to be built "stronger"* than shorter buildings, just to hold themselves up. Damage the right structural elements and they fall easily enough.
"Building 7 had the added feature of being Giuliani's OEM Bunker, not to mention FBI, Secret Service and a host of other government offices."
"[...] Are u saying Building 7 had the same footprint?"
No, I was saying that for example, if you had two buildings that were both, say 50 meters wide by 50 meters deep, but one was 10 stories and the other was 100, it would be easier to cause the taller one to collapse.
Me betraying my ignorance? Hardly. You're projecting - you're the one showing yourself to be ignorant.
man you are like 8th grade level intelligence aren't you?
A building that is 50x50 would be weaker if it was 100 stories tall you're right arrowboy. But in the real world, where the rest of us live, the 100 storey building would not have the same footprint as a 10 story building, so your argument is meaningless, as the rest of them seem to be as well. Good luck in life arrowboy, you're going to need it.
You're projecting again. Hell, I wouldn't even say you have the intelligence of an 8th grader. That would be insulting to 8th graders.
Buildings come in all sorts of sizes in all 3 dimensions. The fact remains, A TALLER BUILDING IS WEAKER THAN A SHORTER ONE. Another fact: WTC7 had a smaller footprint than 5 or 6.
My argument is meaningless? No, you're just stubborn to the extreme. Denying facts when they don't fit your twisted worldview and theory... well, because it's only theory.
Bitterjack1...you are an idiot...Canada had nothing to do with it. With oil at $36 dollars a barrel and falling, thousands of oil workers are out of work. So if that was the plan..it didn't go very well did it? P.S. Canada doesn't want to be a world power...we constantly shake our heads and wonder how Americans can be so imperialistic and still claim to be the freedom crusaders for the world...bullshit. Osama Bin Laden known CIA asset. Next!
Ok I can't stand it any more. I have to tell the truth. I am in a unique position to have this knowledge. Yes 9/11 Twin Towers was a conspiracy. But not by the US...it was CANADA!
Why? Oil Sands. The technology to refine oil from the oil sands in Alberta has been around for decades. It wasn't profitable to do it. getting the US to start a war in the middle east would cause arabian oil prices to soar, making it profitable to get the oil sands and make CANADA a world power.
Tower 7 collapsed because when Towers 1 and 2 fell and destroyed the foundation for the entire building complex. Tower 7 then fell into a hole.
The "explosions" seen coming from the windows of 1 and 2 are the floors collapsing onto the floor below them. So the 20th floor would have had all the weight of 60 floors (4" of concrete per floor) on it. The floors are only designed for 2 - 3 times their own weight.
Why don't you "geniuses" put your effort into something useful like cancer research
All of you conspiracy nuts are saying the US did this to their own buildings, own people on it own land.
You're really covering up your own racist beliefs that a bunch of backwards sand dune walking Arabs couldn't have done anything as complicated as attack the US in such a devistating way. Because if the Arabs could attack the most powerful country in the world, what is stopping them from attacking you?
"This only proves how insidious the terriorist threat is. Over a period of days, weeks, months, or even YEARS, they managed to rig the entire building with explosives."
Um... no. You think these terrorists had access to a building that housed the CIA, the IRS, AMEX, the mayor's office and several financial institutions? Building 7 had to have had one of the highest levels of security in the country.
This only proves how insidious the terriorist threat is. Over a period of days, weeks, months, or even YEARS, they managed to rig the entire building with explosives.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I guess some zelot with a political agenda showing manipulated video in a train station to innocent unsuspecting people is more credible. He is however trying to manipulate, melt, and mold one more thing his video doesn't show. . . people's perceptions. I fail to see how anyone could believe this snake oil salesman, and call themselves an expert or even remotely intelligent. Atleast the soldier was smart enough to stay off camera, because he was obviously no expert either.
I learned well what so called expert told you on TV...
the problem is there were no investigation on wtc 7 ... and no plane hit it... but the building felt in free fall speed in his own footprint. You want to have an opinion, don't be scared go watch LooseChange final cut.
in order for a building to fall in its own footprint as a plan, explosives are placed all ove rthe building. every floor, to insure it will fall a certain way. none of the videos ive seen of 7 showed explosions, anywhere. if they were ground level the building would have topled over and not into its own footprint. using the footprint argument to proove it was a controlled demolition is like saying the dust on the walls is proof no one swept the floor
it must have been the fire then.thanks for your insight.ever considered that the technology used to bring down WTC 1,2,7 is more advanced than anything you've ever seen or can imagine?Just because you don't see them doesn't mean they weren't contained internally.If they were visible then the 'fires brought it down' fairy tale would have been an even harder sell.trust your own eyes and judgement.laws of physics weren't changed that day.Its not your fault, the media brainwashing fooled most people
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I guess people would not know that it only takes about 1,000*F of heat for 10 min. to melt steel, ie. structural members. Nor would they know that the fire protection on those members would have been damaged by a jet liner on impact. The heat generated by thousands of gallons of jet fuel is more than sufficient. Afterall, just a truck full melted a bridge in AL made of concrete and steel that supported semitrucks and cars. What would I know though, I am just a fire fighter that has to know.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
What an ignorant manipulation of video. Why would you trust a non-experts opinion on something like this anyway. Why don't have evaluate plane crashes while we are at it. Gee does no one notice how they show the least amount of video for WTC 7. If they should more then anyone could have seen the damage sustained by the two large towers that came down in uncontrolled fashion to cause its collapse.
WTC 7 was not brought down by demolition. fires cause WTC7 to collapse perfectly symmetrically. The president is a savior of our freedoms and rights. The U.S. has no history of fabricating/performing false flag operation. Bush is not a skull and bones member. He never attended bohemian grove. His grandfather never helped Hitler either. Neither did Carl Rove's grandfather or Arnold Schwarzenegger's grandfather. Nazism could never come to America. Project Mockingbird never occurred.
Everybody knows. FACT: The Australian Department of Defence (DoD) were caught red-handed by Wikiscanner being responsible for the most Wikipedia edits out of any organisation in Australia. Guess who their main target was? Yep, 911TM. Google "PM's staff edited Wikipedia" for Sydney Morning Herald article about it. And Wikipedia is like a 5th Gen FORUM. So that means they have been very busy on all forums doesn't it? Now we know who the deniers are. Lets roll, brothers. Time for courage.
Snipboy, your opinion lack of real knowledge about the very well known dark side of U.S. policies. On example: U.S. (CIA) is behind (if not in front of) the conspiracy to kill Salvador Allende in CHile ... And sooooooo forth ... FActs!!!
9/11 WAS an inside job. The Federal Reserve WAS hijacked by private bankers in 1913. The F/R bankers HAVE infiltrated mainstream media, all levels of Gov, education, medical AND RELIGION to the Vatican... easy to pay off people when you literally create money. Grandad Bush, DID finance Hitler. Constitution IS being dismantled. Wake up you freakin' sheep.
Yes, you are correct. I should have wrote "The task for creating money has been hijacked by private bankers and corporations in 1913." This is the root of our demise people...Thanks to Woodrow Wilson.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i guess this is what canadians do when hockey is not on, i cant imagine me hanging around a subway in america trying to convince people on how the government brought down buildings in another country. american truthers are idiots, canadian truthers are worse
Its always best research before posting an opinion. Your ignorance and/or lack of knowledge is obvious. If U had done your homework & used common sense U would realize that the entire WORLD better wake the fuck up fast. Research New World Order... Study the Patriot Act. Take a look at how our constitutional rights are being taken away. Who financed Hitler?... Well golly-gee, it was grandaddy Bush!
No.3 was a real freaky deal, a guy on the 7th floor had a really big cigar in a non ceramic ashtray and the heat was so intense it melted the structure and it came down. No.4 was controlled, the owner of the bldg said so, he said they "pulled it" on camera, what more do you need. And No.5, I just don't know.
It's called sarcasm. It's for all those who believe what they are told and not what they see. You will notice my remarks to No.4, I stated the facts, the real main issue, Silverstein said he pulled it. The other scenerios are mocking the people who can't see past what they are told to see. Get it????
Actually, No.1 was not controlled. A kid flying a kite lost control of the string and it wrapped around the bldg twice and when the kids father tugged the string real hard it brought down the building. I mean, come on, anyone can see that is what happened, if they are told so. And No.2 was hit by a large seagull and it wiped out the center beams and it came down.
911, wtc7, molten metal, explosions, steven jones, ray griffin, William Rodriguez
So what will you do about it?
Go to impeachbush. org, sign the petition, go to marches & make your voice heard. We need everyone that cares about this country and what she once stood for to now stand and fight for her
Brilliant. Your demonstration pierces the barriers of preconceptons to seeing WTC7 as a controlled demolition. Nice to see people can think straight when the tail is not wagging the dog.
great work boys and girls, everyone should do this at every subway in North America, and see what the odds are of someone saying that WTC 7 collapse was not a controlled demo
The debunkers say that the damage and fire was enough to make this building implode.
OUTSTANDING JOB, YOU GUYS ROCK!!!! from your friends and supporters from Edmonton91Truth, This video needs to be on the desks, hearts and minds of all our politicians, Attn NDP, CONSERVATIVES, LIBERALS...WAKE UP! Main Stream Media...go back to sleep, We've already got Montreal.
Webster Tarpley in Montreal, It should be a great meeting, Webster was an inspiration to many of us at the Vancouver's conference as I'm certain he will be there too!
The natural collapse would be the one that was burning for hours, had no explosive sounds and no explosive flashes at the moment of collapse. That would be number 4. Even though, deceptively, this person never showed the sound by either of these collpases. Because that would be a dead give away. By the way, WTC7 collapsed for the exact same reason as the substantial internal collapse of WTC5: Fires!
Connclusion: The person with the soundless laptop wasted his time with these street interviews.
wimahlers 3 weeks ago
by the way Youtube has removed the sound from this when i play it....
guywakingup 1 year ago
Here's what it says: "NOTICE This video contains an audio track that has not been authorized by all copyright holders. The audio has been disabled. "
daelka 1 year ago
There is no sound. It says audio is blocked for copyright issue - although they don't say by whom.
daelka 1 year ago
Most people pointing to number 2 because the explosives are too strong
123ziran 2 years ago
Buildings come in all sorts of sizes in all 3 dimensions.
Yes Arrowhead they do come in all three dimensions. You really are an expert aren't you? LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
The fact remains, A TALLER BUILDING IS WEAKER THAN A SHORTER ONE.
No Arrowhead, this is not true. Sorry to tell you, but just because you keep saying it doesn't make it true. In the real world there are things called building codes, and they specify that taller buildings have to be stronger than shorter ones. You should look it up one day while studying the three dimensions.
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
Simple perception test:
Did you see planes hit the World Trade Center?
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
Did you see a plane hit this buliding, Building 7? Didn't think so.
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
"Did you see a plane hit this buliding, Building 7? Didn't think so."
True.
I saw a lot worse:
I saw Building 1 hit Building 7!!
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
Actually you saw Buildings 1 and 2 hit Buildings 5 and 6, yet for some strange reason those shredded shells of buildings didn't collapse, only Building 7
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
The devil's in the details. 5 and 6 were stout little buildings, less than 10 storeys tall. 7 was a 47-storey skyscraper.
Totally different buildings.
And the debris impact on the buildings was probably different in its own way.
But I guess in the trutherverse, everything's equal.
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
"And the debris impact on the buildings was probably different in its own way."
Probably different? They were definitely different. Buildings 5 and 6 were thoroughly shredded by the collapses, and like you said they were smaller buildings, not as strong as Building 7. Number 7 was not severely damaged, it had minimal damage. Fires on a few floors and a lot of smoke. Yet it collapsed at freefall speed through the path of most resistance
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
"and like you said they were smaller buildings, not as strong as Building 7."
In the real world, taller buildings are weaker than shorter ones with the same footprint.
"Number 7 was not severely damaged, it had minimal damage. [...]"
You know that isn't true, but you keep telling yourself that because it makes your controlled demolition "theory" sound more credible (or at least less batshit).
"Yet it collapsed at freefall speed through the path of most resistance"
Really? How do you figure?
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
In the real world Arrowhead, taller buildings are a hell of a lot stronger than shorter buildings, and Building 7 had the added feature of being Giuliani's OEM Bunker, not to mention FBI, Secret Service and a host of other government offices. And your little line you threw in to sound educated in this field actually betrays your ignorance because taller buildings do not have the same footprint as smaller ones, there is no "with the same footprint." Are u saying Building 7 had the same footprint?
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
"Number 7 was not severely damaged, it had minimal damage. [...]"
You know that isn't true, but you keep telling yourself that because it makes your controlled demolition "theory" sound more credible (or at least less batshit).
"Yet it collapsed at freefall speed through the path of most resistance"
Really? How do you figure?"
Please show me one proof of substantial damage to Building 7 that would cause it to fall at freefall speed. How do I figure that? It's called the scientifc method.
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
"In the real world Arrowhead, taller buildings are a hell of a lot stronger than shorter buildings"
Nope. Say it all you want, it won't make it true.
Taller buildings *have to be built "stronger"* than shorter buildings, just to hold themselves up. Damage the right structural elements and they fall easily enough.
"Building 7 had the added feature of being Giuliani's OEM Bunker, not to mention FBI, Secret Service and a host of other government offices."
Conspiracy theory much?
(continued)
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
(continued)
"[...] Are u saying Building 7 had the same footprint?"
No, I was saying that for example, if you had two buildings that were both, say 50 meters wide by 50 meters deep, but one was 10 stories and the other was 100, it would be easier to cause the taller one to collapse.
Me betraying my ignorance? Hardly. You're projecting - you're the one showing yourself to be ignorant.
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
man you are like 8th grade level intelligence aren't you?
A building that is 50x50 would be weaker if it was 100 stories tall you're right arrowboy. But in the real world, where the rest of us live, the 100 storey building would not have the same footprint as a 10 story building, so your argument is meaningless, as the rest of them seem to be as well. Good luck in life arrowboy, you're going to need it.
MTL911Truth 2 years ago
You're projecting again. Hell, I wouldn't even say you have the intelligence of an 8th grader. That would be insulting to 8th graders.
Buildings come in all sorts of sizes in all 3 dimensions. The fact remains, A TALLER BUILDING IS WEAKER THAN A SHORTER ONE. Another fact: WTC7 had a smaller footprint than 5 or 6.
My argument is meaningless? No, you're just stubborn to the extreme. Denying facts when they don't fit your twisted worldview and theory... well, because it's only theory.
ArrowHead83 2 years ago
It's simple some of the music belonged to Warner and they didn't pay the user rights to use it.
sidecarcn 3 years ago
Bitterjack1...you are an idiot...Canada had nothing to do with it. With oil at $36 dollars a barrel and falling, thousands of oil workers are out of work. So if that was the plan..it didn't go very well did it? P.S. Canada doesn't want to be a world power...we constantly shake our heads and wonder how Americans can be so imperialistic and still claim to be the freedom crusaders for the world...bullshit. Osama Bin Laden known CIA asset. Next!
000deadcalm000 3 years ago
Ok I can't stand it any more. I have to tell the truth. I am in a unique position to have this knowledge. Yes 9/11 Twin Towers was a conspiracy. But not by the US...it was CANADA!
Why? Oil Sands. The technology to refine oil from the oil sands in Alberta has been around for decades. It wasn't profitable to do it. getting the US to start a war in the middle east would cause arabian oil prices to soar, making it profitable to get the oil sands and make CANADA a world power.
CANADA did it.
Bitterjack1 3 years ago
Tower 7 collapsed because when Towers 1 and 2 fell and destroyed the foundation for the entire building complex. Tower 7 then fell into a hole.
The "explosions" seen coming from the windows of 1 and 2 are the floors collapsing onto the floor below them. So the 20th floor would have had all the weight of 60 floors (4" of concrete per floor) on it. The floors are only designed for 2 - 3 times their own weight.
Why don't you "geniuses" put your effort into something useful like cancer research
Bitterjack1 3 years ago 2
All of you conspiracy nuts are saying the US did this to their own buildings, own people on it own land.
You're really covering up your own racist beliefs that a bunch of backwards sand dune walking Arabs couldn't have done anything as complicated as attack the US in such a devistating way. Because if the Arabs could attack the most powerful country in the world, what is stopping them from attacking you?
Bitterjack1 3 years ago
"This only proves how insidious the terriorist threat is. Over a period of days, weeks, months, or even YEARS, they managed to rig the entire building with explosives."
Um... no. You think these terrorists had access to a building that housed the CIA, the IRS, AMEX, the mayor's office and several financial institutions? Building 7 had to have had one of the highest levels of security in the country.
skimpreza 3 years ago
Brilliant idea. Iwill try and bring this to london. Well done guys.
nathanielmak 3 years ago
Sounds like MTL911Truth are script writers for X-files.
sidecarcn 3 years ago
Sounds like they have been hit by copyright problems.
Makron5 3 years ago
This only proves how insidious the terriorist threat is. Over a period of days, weeks, months, or even YEARS, they managed to rig the entire building with explosives.
LokisLaughter 3 years ago
TOTAL TRUTH PERCEPTION TEST
911 octopus part 8
911 amateur part 2
got TEN minutes???
TWO eyes???
warGAMEOVER
wsee 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I guess some zelot with a political agenda showing manipulated video in a train station to innocent unsuspecting people is more credible. He is however trying to manipulate, melt, and mold one more thing his video doesn't show. . . people's perceptions. I fail to see how anyone could believe this snake oil salesman, and call themselves an expert or even remotely intelligent. Atleast the soldier was smart enough to stay off camera, because he was obviously no expert either.
workhorse95 3 years ago
I learned well what so called expert told you on TV...
the problem is there were no investigation on wtc 7 ... and no plane hit it... but the building felt in free fall speed in his own footprint. You want to have an opinion, don't be scared go watch LooseChange final cut.
freekrolik 3 years ago 2
in order for a building to fall in its own footprint as a plan, explosives are placed all ove rthe building. every floor, to insure it will fall a certain way. none of the videos ive seen of 7 showed explosions, anywhere. if they were ground level the building would have topled over and not into its own footprint. using the footprint argument to proove it was a controlled demolition is like saying the dust on the walls is proof no one swept the floor
matchesison 3 years ago
it must have been the fire then.thanks for your insight.ever considered that the technology used to bring down WTC 1,2,7 is more advanced than anything you've ever seen or can imagine?Just because you don't see them doesn't mean they weren't contained internally.If they were visible then the 'fires brought it down' fairy tale would have been an even harder sell.trust your own eyes and judgement.laws of physics weren't changed that day.Its not your fault, the media brainwashing fooled most people
playonwords55 3 years ago
watch RING OF POWER and ESOTERIC agenda then comment
diecrewdeluks 3 years ago
agent?
lumpfish99 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I guess people would not know that it only takes about 1,000*F of heat for 10 min. to melt steel, ie. structural members. Nor would they know that the fire protection on those members would have been damaged by a jet liner on impact. The heat generated by thousands of gallons of jet fuel is more than sufficient. Afterall, just a truck full melted a bridge in AL made of concrete and steel that supported semitrucks and cars. What would I know though, I am just a fire fighter that has to know.
workhorse95 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What an ignorant manipulation of video. Why would you trust a non-experts opinion on something like this anyway. Why don't have evaluate plane crashes while we are at it. Gee does no one notice how they show the least amount of video for WTC 7. If they should more then anyone could have seen the damage sustained by the two large towers that came down in uncontrolled fashion to cause its collapse.
workhorse95 3 years ago
Awesome work. I'd like to know if there is a 9/11 Truth group in Ottawa.
persona19 4 years ago
Great work brother.
Focoist911 4 years ago 3
WTC 7 was not brought down by demolition. fires cause WTC7 to collapse perfectly symmetrically. The president is a savior of our freedoms and rights. The U.S. has no history of fabricating/performing false flag operation. Bush is not a skull and bones member. He never attended bohemian grove. His grandfather never helped Hitler either. Neither did Carl Rove's grandfather or Arnold Schwarzenegger's grandfather. Nazism could never come to America. Project Mockingbird never occurred.
snipboy 4 years ago
Everybody knows. FACT: The Australian Department of Defence (DoD) were caught red-handed by Wikiscanner being responsible for the most Wikipedia edits out of any organisation in Australia. Guess who their main target was? Yep, 911TM. Google "PM's staff edited Wikipedia" for Sydney Morning Herald article about it. And Wikipedia is like a 5th Gen FORUM. So that means they have been very busy on all forums doesn't it? Now we know who the deniers are. Lets roll, brothers. Time for courage.
Focoist911 4 years ago
NISR report says none of the steel got hot enough to compromise.
NIST report says that their tests didn't prove that the trusses failed...
hgfbob 4 years ago
"The U.S. has no history of fabricating/performing false flag operation"-
do your homework before you make stupid statements like that......we have and do, we have a long history of doing that
hgfbob 4 years ago
Snipboy, your opinion lack of real knowledge about the very well known dark side of U.S. policies. On example: U.S. (CIA) is behind (if not in front of) the conspiracy to kill Salvador Allende in CHile ... And sooooooo forth ... FActs!!!
asdrubalhuerta 4 years ago
Snipboy was being sarcastic, he had me wince at the 1st line, smirk by the second and bust laughing by the third
;)
Rickdeckard2020 3 years ago
I hope you are saying this with sarcasm.
shiimera 3 years ago
Shame about the sound but i like your angle. Nice to see more people doing work to smash the NWO and more people being exposed to the truth.
The resistance sowing its roots.
crazymoo56 4 years ago 2
Great Job!
Check out my video response.
Winnipeg Represent!
Zwikster 4 years ago 2
Les Québéquois sont si curieux et très intelligent. Bien fait! 9/11 WAS an inside job.
idotvads 4 years ago 3
Effective!
Anyone who looks at the truth sees it for what it is.
DJEN33 4 years ago
Excellent work.
d0m1n4t1 4 years ago 5
Good work fella.
This is the kind of thing Michael Moore should do.
greatngood 4 years ago 3
actually Iran and North Korea both have central banks.
MTL911Truth 4 years ago
Countries without Central banks....
Iran and North Korea.....
Guess who the banks will back in a war???
Guess the name of the Newest country to get Central Banking installed........IRAQ
slammah2012 4 years ago
Good job....
TFHL
Tinfoilhatlady 4 years ago
Good work, soldier.
Dekloren 4 years ago
I'm curious the results.. did 1in5 guess correctly meaning nobody can tell the difference?
gesellschaft 4 years ago
Pull it?
Naturyl 4 years ago
9/11 WAS an inside job. The Federal Reserve WAS hijacked by private bankers in 1913. The F/R bankers HAVE infiltrated mainstream media, all levels of Gov, education, medical AND RELIGION to the Vatican... easy to pay off people when you literally create money. Grandad Bush, DID finance Hitler. Constitution IS being dismantled. Wake up you freakin' sheep.
Tuflitl1 4 years ago 5
The federal reserve didnt exist until then
slammah2012 4 years ago
Yes, you are correct. I should have wrote "The task for creating money has been hijacked by private bankers and corporations in 1913." This is the root of our demise people...Thanks to Woodrow Wilson.
Tuflitl1 4 years ago
Thanks mostly to Paul Warburg, Nelson Aldrich, and Edward Mandell House (Huis), Wilson's handler.
murrayrothstein 4 years ago 3
911 Tuth is THE most important thing in the world right now. The war is based on lies.
911 truth ends war!
WTFaboutWTC7 4 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
here another conspiracy bullshit
homemarks 4 years ago
Yes homemarks, it's all conspiracy bullshit, a stinkin' shit sandwich past it's best before date.
That's why HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS around the world consider themselves 911 skeptics. The number grows daily.
KayBeeArgh 4 years ago 3
well just fucking great that all we neat more dumb ass
homemarks 4 years ago
Don't be so hard on yourself fella...
Things will get better...
truth and education will converge again.....
slammah2012 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i guess this is what canadians do when hockey is not on, i cant imagine me hanging around a subway in america trying to convince people on how the government brought down buildings in another country. american truthers are idiots, canadian truthers are worse
BUDDAWG2004 4 years ago
so your job is to be a SHEEEEEEEEP!!!!!!!!
nhharm 4 years ago
well I do live in Canada buddy but I agree with you 9/11 conspiracy is bullshit
homemarks 4 years ago
That is exactly why the conspiracy bullshit must be exposed.....
slammah2012 4 years ago
Its always best research before posting an opinion. Your ignorance and/or lack of knowledge is obvious. If U had done your homework & used common sense U would realize that the entire WORLD better wake the fuck up fast. Research New World Order... Study the Patriot Act. Take a look at how our constitutional rights are being taken away. Who financed Hitler?... Well golly-gee, it was grandaddy Bush!
Tuflitl1 4 years ago 2
That is exactly why the conspiracy bullshit must be exposed.....
slammah2012 4 years ago
Great work guys. very good video.
dpuck 4 years ago 9
This is a well thought out creative response.
Merci bien. Je vous souhaite la bonne chance ce week-end.
edmonton911truth
11ts11 4 years ago 7
No.3 was a real freaky deal, a guy on the 7th floor had a really big cigar in a non ceramic ashtray and the heat was so intense it melted the structure and it came down. No.4 was controlled, the owner of the bldg said so, he said they "pulled it" on camera, what more do you need. And No.5, I just don't know.
ragnbull 4 years ago 7
Avoid the actual issues. It's your choice. This is America.
apocalypsynch 4 years ago
It's called sarcasm. It's for all those who believe what they are told and not what they see. You will notice my remarks to No.4, I stated the facts, the real main issue, Silverstein said he pulled it. The other scenerios are mocking the people who can't see past what they are told to see. Get it????
ragnbull 4 years ago
Actually, No.1 was not controlled. A kid flying a kite lost control of the string and it wrapped around the bldg twice and when the kids father tugged the string real hard it brought down the building. I mean, come on, anyone can see that is what happened, if they are told so. And No.2 was hit by a large seagull and it wiped out the center beams and it came down.
ragnbull 4 years ago 8
amazing video and great idea
calgary911truth dot org
djlogitek 4 years ago 12
good concept but this video really needs some subtitles.
PFCAhammed 4 years ago 8
nice mcgill metro ;-)
dmmc1043 4 years ago 9
FREE 911 CONFERENCE IN MONTREAL:
SAT THE 20 OF OCT. AT Centre St-Pierre, #100, 1212 Panet, Mtl, Metro Beaudry
ENJOYOURMATRIX 4 years ago 9
Excellent video!
9/11=clearly an inside job
Criminals in jail & not running governments
IMPEACH Cheney NOW!
USA, wake up & act now, before it's too late
Research it for yourself, Google it:
911, wtc7, molten metal, explosions, steven jones, ray griffin, William Rodriguez
So what will you do about it?
Go to impeachbush. org, sign the petition, go to marches & make your voice heard. We need everyone that cares about this country and what she once stood for to now stand and fight for her
qbeac 4 years ago 9
Another huge bitch-slap into the face of "debunker"-suckers.
DStyle86 4 years ago 8
Brilliant. Your demonstration pierces the barriers of preconceptons to seeing WTC7 as a controlled demolition. Nice to see people can think straight when the tail is not wagging the dog.
juice797 4 years ago 11
great work boys and girls, everyone should do this at every subway in North America, and see what the odds are of someone saying that WTC 7 collapse was not a controlled demo
The debunkers say that the damage and fire was enough to make this building implode.
grozlz 4 years ago 9
OUTSTANDING JOB, YOU GUYS ROCK!!!! from your friends and supporters from Edmonton91Truth, This video needs to be on the desks, hearts and minds of all our politicians, Attn NDP, CONSERVATIVES, LIBERALS...WAKE UP! Main Stream Media...go back to sleep, We've already got Montreal.
hawkeyicockburn 4 years ago 8
Webster Tarpley in Montreal, It should be a great meeting, Webster was an inspiration to many of us at the Vancouver's conference as I'm certain he will be there too!
hawkeyicockburn 4 years ago 9
Excellent travail!
Je serai à la conférence samedi. J'aurai une table avec 400 DVD à donner. Simon
We have the pleasure of inviting you to the conference entitled September 11th 2001 = Let the Truth Be Exposed.
Our speakers include:
Webster Tarpley and Connie Fogal
Saturday October 20th, 2007, 6 to 10 pm
Centre St-Pierre, 1212 Panet #100, Montréal, Metro Beaudry
pellelindbergh 4 years ago 7
wonderfull ! great idea!
peace0be 4 years ago 6
great job fellas.
mjd1982 4 years ago 7