I don't think Charlie was being condescending to Palin. I just think he was getting sick of her pointing and saying "well Charlie" and talking to him like she new what the hell she was talking about. It was obvious she was versed into what to say. She couldn't wait to get it out.... just like a school child on test day. Obama, never looses his nerve...very relaxed and is consice with his answers. Don't get mad, because she's not very knowledgeable on foreign policy.
I think the condescending tone Gibson shows Palin stems from some of the previous answers Palin gave Gibson to questions such as the Bush Doctrine. Once she showed that she didn't know what it was, Gibson lost respect for her as a serious political candidate and treated her as though she didn't know what she was talking about with EVERY issue being discussed.
I will sleep better at night with Palin in charge. Obama is weak. It is called the executive branch for a reason. Obama will not be able to vote "Present" when faced with a decision. He voted "Present" on 152 Decision in his short 180 days in the Senate. Not "yes" and not "no", but "Present".
The difference I see between Obama and Palin is that Obama is very curious about the world, processes questions deeply, thinks for himself, and trusts the traditional American value that a real adult tries to avert war.
Palin is programmed to repeat soundbytes, acts super confident about her answers, revealing how insecure she is with her own limited intellect. Like when Bush bragged "I read 87 books last year". You only brag about that if you're insecure about being a retard.
yeah, if you watch this interview in sequence, she had already said her comment about hellbent islamists so many times i wanted to jump through the screen and kill her myself, and the amount of time the kept calling him charlie was a whole other thing. you can tell in the whole interview that charles just gets impatient. Plus, obama is more laid back, therefore charles wa., palin is like really perky and in your face, which is annoying sometimes.
What do I think? I think Charlie Gibson was condescending and slightly adversarial with Sarah Palin while handling BO with the usual kid gloves. For one who sprang so recently into the fray of the campaign, I also think Sarah Palin was poised and gave a good accounting of herself - at least as good as, uh, you know, uh the other, uh, guy.
Their responses are almost identical. The difference is in style. Obama seems to hesitate and is more philosophical. Sarah Palin seems more decisive. What is REALLY DIFFERENT is Charlie Gibson's attitude. He was laid back with Obama, but on the attack with Palin, interrumping her and asking for more specific answers and trying to make her nervous, just like a college professor who doesn't like you and is out to get you. Go Sarah! You've earned my respect. This is lipstick I can believe in.
If Gibson and his network's news weren't so irrelevant today, i might actually be upset at his bias and lack of journalistic integrity, but alas... Perhaps Gibson too had such tingly feelings up his legs while Barak spoke that he was unable to press the issue any further.
I cant believe a mainstream media figure is a leftist and would favor obama! go figure! I thought the media was supposed to report the news not spin it!
Regardless of political leanings, what this showed me is that Gibson let Obama answer the question and then moved on to the next issue and with Palin, he kept looking for a Yes/No answer. He did not treat both in the same way. It shows bias and I am disappointed because essentially, Palin & Obama are giving the same answer; but Gibson dislikes Palin's answer - the most likely explanation is personal bias.
BTW, I am an Obama supporter & also an objective viewer. Let's get to the issues.
You might wonder why Charlie is so agitated and right in Palin's face. Look at the way how shes answering questions. She can't even answer a question properly without looking like shes going to explode. At least Obama can stay clam, and actually put some thought into his answers.
Charlie looks like he is a professor trying to talk down to a student. Anyone who thinks that Obama is more qualified that Palin needs to think again. Charlie gave Obama a free pass. The left wing media has no idea that they are helping McCain/Palin by their constant jabs at issues that Americans do not care about. Keep talking about Palin and comparing her to Obama and watch McCain take the white house. McCain is the candidate that can't lose with a party that shouldn't win.
Wow! The libs comparing our vp candidate to their presidential one is basically their way of stating Obama isn't fit to be president.. It's obvious Gibson was cordial and relaxed with Obama.His body language with Palin was standoffish and he had a smart assed tone with her.
why isnt this dumb fuck asking McCain. Obummer is going to lose this thanks in part to the ignorant liberal hacks in the media who continue to pair Palin against Obummer
Issue is, we keep comparing Palin to Obama. Obama is much smarter, and I'll vote for him, but we are going to loose this if we comparing the presidential candidate to the vp. It lowers Obama's stature
Obama's answers are vauge, while Palins are concise on what she will do. But wait, who is running for President and who is running for VP? Obama's answers should be more concise than Palins and they are not.
I totally agree, he's very rude and condescending to her, in a way that he wasn't with BO. However, I WISH someone would tell her how to say that word correctly, it makes me think of Bush!
I don't think Charlie was being condescending to Palin. I just think he was getting sick of her pointing and saying "well Charlie" and talking to him like she new what the hell she was talking about. It was obvious she was versed into what to say. She couldn't wait to get it out.... just like a school child on test day. Obama, never looses his nerve...very relaxed and is consice with his answers. Don't get mad, because she's not very knowledgeable on foreign policy.
LightninRD 3 years ago
I think the condescending tone Gibson shows Palin stems from some of the previous answers Palin gave Gibson to questions such as the Bush Doctrine. Once she showed that she didn't know what it was, Gibson lost respect for her as a serious political candidate and treated her as though she didn't know what she was talking about with EVERY issue being discussed.
hellspreetube 3 years ago
I will sleep better at night with Palin in charge. Obama is weak. It is called the executive branch for a reason. Obama will not be able to vote "Present" when faced with a decision. He voted "Present" on 152 Decision in his short 180 days in the Senate. Not "yes" and not "no", but "Present".
searchMLS 3 years ago
Is that what you re basing ur decision on. You dope
tobim2004 3 years ago
The difference I see between Obama and Palin is that Obama is very curious about the world, processes questions deeply, thinks for himself, and trusts the traditional American value that a real adult tries to avert war.
Palin is programmed to repeat soundbytes, acts super confident about her answers, revealing how insecure she is with her own limited intellect. Like when Bush bragged "I read 87 books last year". You only brag about that if you're insecure about being a retard.
SpySlowhands 3 years ago 5
yeah, if you watch this interview in sequence, she had already said her comment about hellbent islamists so many times i wanted to jump through the screen and kill her myself, and the amount of time the kept calling him charlie was a whole other thing. you can tell in the whole interview that charles just gets impatient. Plus, obama is more laid back, therefore charles wa., palin is like really perky and in your face, which is annoying sometimes.
firstcompass 3 years ago
"Nuculer weapons"... do all republicans say it that way?
BlueFire70 3 years ago
OMG! Just how much make-up does BO need?
What do I think? I think Charlie Gibson was condescending and slightly adversarial with Sarah Palin while handling BO with the usual kid gloves. For one who sprang so recently into the fray of the campaign, I also think Sarah Palin was poised and gave a good accounting of herself - at least as good as, uh, you know, uh the other, uh, guy.
PortiaElizabeth 3 years ago
Their responses are almost identical. The difference is in style. Obama seems to hesitate and is more philosophical. Sarah Palin seems more decisive. What is REALLY DIFFERENT is Charlie Gibson's attitude. He was laid back with Obama, but on the attack with Palin, interrumping her and asking for more specific answers and trying to make her nervous, just like a college professor who doesn't like you and is out to get you. Go Sarah! You've earned my respect. This is lipstick I can believe in.
livri 3 years ago
@livri I noticed the same thing. No bias here.
rjdshmetal 1 year ago
If Gibson and his network's news weren't so irrelevant today, i might actually be upset at his bias and lack of journalistic integrity, but alas... Perhaps Gibson too had such tingly feelings up his legs while Barak spoke that he was unable to press the issue any further.
bigsurwithlove 3 years ago
obama keeps saying he'll do everything he can in his power to keep from making that choice.
For once he speaks the the truth! He has ALWAYS done everything in his power to keep from making choices.
saveRcountryfromlibs 3 years ago 2
What an ignorant McBitch!!! Go back to Alaska and take McPow with you.
Dcole61 3 years ago
Kill yourself you liberal piece of shit.
kingdd 3 years ago
Palin may have been nervous, scripted and even defensive (gee, why would THAT be?) but she is hardly scared.
SAHMmster 3 years ago
I cant believe a mainstream media figure is a leftist and would favor obama! go figure! I thought the media was supposed to report the news not spin it!
sketchyfolk 3 years ago
Regardless of political leanings, what this showed me is that Gibson let Obama answer the question and then moved on to the next issue and with Palin, he kept looking for a Yes/No answer. He did not treat both in the same way. It shows bias and I am disappointed because essentially, Palin & Obama are giving the same answer; but Gibson dislikes Palin's answer - the most likely explanation is personal bias.
BTW, I am an Obama supporter & also an objective viewer. Let's get to the issues.
dtclare 3 years ago 6
You might wonder why Charlie is so agitated and right in Palin's face. Look at the way how shes answering questions. She can't even answer a question properly without looking like shes going to explode. At least Obama can stay clam, and actually put some thought into his answers.
Deathtone 3 years ago
Obama wasn't asked the same question three times, fool. Let's see how calm you stay when asked the same thing over and over.
mthrndr1 3 years ago
Charlie looks like he is a professor trying to talk down to a student. Anyone who thinks that Obama is more qualified that Palin needs to think again. Charlie gave Obama a free pass. The left wing media has no idea that they are helping McCain/Palin by their constant jabs at issues that Americans do not care about. Keep talking about Palin and comparing her to Obama and watch McCain take the white house. McCain is the candidate that can't lose with a party that shouldn't win.
wadeaver 3 years ago
Take note of the setting. Chuck is laid back, behind a table with Obama. Notice the distance
With Palin he is right in front of her, looks like several feet in difference.
I wonder why that is....
GroundChuk 3 years ago
Wow! The libs comparing our vp candidate to their presidential one is basically their way of stating Obama isn't fit to be president.. It's obvious Gibson was cordial and relaxed with Obama.His body language with Palin was standoffish and he had a smart assed tone with her.
10mmfury 3 years ago
why isnt this dumb fuck asking McCain. Obummer is going to lose this thanks in part to the ignorant liberal hacks in the media who continue to pair Palin against Obummer
plane5607 3 years ago
Double standard liberal media
sudosh 3 years ago
Obama is calm, cool, strong, cautious and insightful. Palin is nervous, defensive, scared, reactive, and scripted. There's really no comparison.
Obama '08
nomccainnopalin 3 years ago
Issue is, we keep comparing Palin to Obama. Obama is much smarter, and I'll vote for him, but we are going to loose this if we comparing the presidential candidate to the vp. It lowers Obama's stature
margaritivil 3 years ago
Obama's answers are vauge, while Palins are concise on what she will do. But wait, who is running for President and who is running for VP? Obama's answers should be more concise than Palins and they are not.
russ637 3 years ago
I think that Gibson treats Obama one way, and Palin another.
thgrant 3 years ago 3
I totally agree, he's very rude and condescending to her, in a way that he wasn't with BO. However, I WISH someone would tell her how to say that word correctly, it makes me think of Bush!
BoEmery 3 years ago