Evaluate each man on his merits, and the reason will become apparent. What Ron Paul advocates (and has been consistent in doing so) is what will indeed bring peace to the world, ie non intervention in the affairs of other nations where those affairs have no bearing on the USA.
His economic policy is idealistic too. He has started a movement that is bigger than his personality, and he is ok with that. He is more interested in change, than just being president.
So promoting that 9/11 was an inside job and that the American government murders its own people like Saddam Huessein in FEMA camps will bring world peace? Isolationism and racial intolerence for the Jewish people will bring world peace?
You're right, he did start a movement, a cult movement. A cult that threatens the lives of all who oppose Ron Paul.
Bush never killed millions. The Taliban in Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda in Iraq killed everything they saw. Read history and turn off the BBC.
I'm not here to defend every (alleged or actual) position Ron Paul has. However, on a general basis, I'd much rather have his policies than George Bush's.
The truth is always best, but plz don't put words I didn't say into my mouth. I don't know about cults or lives being threatened. I don't live in the USA either, so I don't even have a vote in this matter anyway. The fact is, many non-Americans tend to favour Ron Paul.
@sabaton4life1 Seriously? Your advice is to read history. I like that part....but I'm not at all convinced that you have ever touched a history book. If you think Bush doesn't have innocent blood on his hands, you clearly have been in a coma for the last decade. Maybe you should stop watching Fox news and think for yourself.
So because I guessed your age because you use immature language and slander on a former US President, that automatically makes me a fanboy? Let me re-guess your age: 8.
i could care less how old you think I am or if you approve of the language I use, it doesn't change the fact that you are a fucking idiot for supporting George bush.
I never once said I supported George W. Bush. Paranoia has seeped into your brain and has corrupted your mind, but your from the worst city in the world so I can see why. When did I ever say I supported George W. Bush?
Because slandering any President is inappropriate. It's something only children do or adults with mental disorders. I will admit Bush made a lot of mistakes and I will also tell you I do not like Barack Obama or what he's doing to this country, but I'm not immature enough to call him something like "a fuckin douche."
You should be careful before you use such an absolute as "slandering any president is inappropriate". If a german in nazi germany slandered hitler would that have been inappropriate? I don't think so.
But then again if that happened, that German would be rounded up and shot on the spot. That's not how we do things in the US. It never happened under Bush and believe it or not, it won't even happen under Obama.
Whereas you originally stated that they should be free from slander simply because they are presidents, now your saying that its because their actions as president have not justified slander. So now that you've we've deduced your original statement incorrect, we can discuss this one.
I think destroying the bill of rights with the patriot act and lieing to go into a war that we started illegally justifies criticism.
I didn't change my argument but perhaps I need to be a little bit more slow for you. No one deserves to be called "a fuckin douche" because only children call each other those things. I don't agree with what Obama is doing, but I still respect him because he's the President. That's the problem with Libertarians, they are borderline fascists. If a non-Libertarian is President, that makes him fair-game for people like you.
As for your point: What lies to go to war? What are you talking about?
Why should presidents get any more respect then anyone else? I respect people for their actions, not because of their position of authority. Patriotism is just as dogmatic and irrational as religion. To respect someone just because they have power is borderline cowardice.
By the way I'm not libertarian, I'm not anything. It doesn't take a libertarian to see that bush and obama are both douches.
And i'm refering to the WMD lies, but that discussion will become redundant.
Because Presidents are leading an entire nation and I respect Obama for his position, not because of what he's doing. I agree that he's not fixing the economy and his campaign was built on lies. People like you are what's wrong with America. People who say that patriotism and religion is irrational. Those are things Alex Jones would say.
If you're not a Libertarian, why do you talk and act like one and have a disturbing obsession with Ron Paul?
WE PUT SADAM IN POWER AND SOLD HIM ALL OF HIS WEAPONS!
And ron paul is the only politician that still seems to give a damn about the people of this country, whether I aggree with everything he sayes or not.
Don't be stupid. You have an obsession with Hitler too and you should know that Saddam rose to power the same way that Hitler did; legally. He wiggled through every bureacuratic loophole through the Ba'ath Party instead of the National Socialist German Worker's Party.
If people thought that Ron Paul cared about them, why'd he come in dead last in all the primaries? Every rational person knows that Ron Paul is crazy and borderline dangerous alongside his anti-American comrade Alex Jones.
Rp came in last bc the election wasnt fair, as it hasnt been for awhile. I observed Pauls campaign and the way he and his supporters were treated was wrong. RP is not crazy or dangerous lol, and when did we find the WMD? woulda been useful 10 years ago!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ron Paul is a piece of shit, any right-wing politician is a piece of shit, and democrats (including Obama) are moderate pieces of shit and not true leftists.
By the way, Nationalism IS stupid, I am a citizen of the Earth and pledge loyalty to no state.
Name one thing Ron Paul has said that does not follow the US Constitution. Name one time Ron Paul voted for an unconstitutional bill. If this makes him crazy and dangerous, than so were the founding fathers. There is very little hope for this country with uneducated fools like you voting.
we have way more serious issues to deal with in here than bad language, so only adults with mental disorders swear? and children? you should really choose your words more carefully.
SLANDER: Anything spoken about an individual that is false and malicious that ridicules them or damages their reputation.
That's how impotent the zionist controlled media feels when they have to go to these methods to drive people away from the seriousness and importance of Ron Paul message.
It is incredible how the US media goes so low suporting such disgusting and unpatriotic acts, supporting this british jewish crap comming from overseas to bash one of our few honest leaders left in congress.
I saw Rachel in the democratic channel promoting this piece of sh*t movie.
Ron Paul such a good man and treated so bad by the media and hollywood. Shame....
jneil2007 9 months ago
Did Ron Paul have sex with Bruno? Is that why he agreed to be in this movie?
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
There is something very queer about Ron Paul.
JimmyFormerMarine 1 year ago
Ron Paul almost became Bruno's bitch! LOL!
JimmyFormerMarine 2 years ago
This is a superb film, I found it for free here: VIEWFILMSFREE (.) COM
sabrinamendezjz 2 years ago
Austrian Economics :)
mo1elftausend 2 years ago
F%$& Borat or whatever his new name is. you cant mess with Ron Paul.
BOYCOTT
KrookidOne 2 years ago
So Ron Paul is not allowed to be messed with but its okay to slander Bush on a daily basis?
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
Yes.
romanali1 2 years ago
Why?
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
Evaluate each man on his merits, and the reason will become apparent. What Ron Paul advocates (and has been consistent in doing so) is what will indeed bring peace to the world, ie non intervention in the affairs of other nations where those affairs have no bearing on the USA.
His economic policy is idealistic too. He has started a movement that is bigger than his personality, and he is ok with that. He is more interested in change, than just being president.
Whereas Bush killed millions. =/
romanali1 2 years ago 7
So promoting that 9/11 was an inside job and that the American government murders its own people like Saddam Huessein in FEMA camps will bring world peace? Isolationism and racial intolerence for the Jewish people will bring world peace?
You're right, he did start a movement, a cult movement. A cult that threatens the lives of all who oppose Ron Paul.
Bush never killed millions. The Taliban in Afghanistan and Al-Qaeda in Iraq killed everything they saw. Read history and turn off the BBC.
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
I'm not here to defend every (alleged or actual) position Ron Paul has. However, on a general basis, I'd much rather have his policies than George Bush's.
The truth is always best, but plz don't put words I didn't say into my mouth. I don't know about cults or lives being threatened. I don't live in the USA either, so I don't even have a vote in this matter anyway. The fact is, many non-Americans tend to favour Ron Paul.
Ignore that if you will; it's your own future.
"Blowback" caused war.
romanali1 2 years ago 3
History? lol sounds like you are the one who needs to turn off the tube!
IVDRIP 2 years ago
@sabaton4life1 Seriously? Your advice is to read history. I like that part....but I'm not at all convinced that you have ever touched a history book. If you think Bush doesn't have innocent blood on his hands, you clearly have been in a coma for the last decade. Maybe you should stop watching Fox news and think for yourself.
Jewavenger 1 year ago
yeah because Bush is a fucking douche.
HayteStreet 2 years ago
Let me guess: You are 12 years old.
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
lol you are a bush fanboy and you thinkthat I am 12? have you been in a fucking coma these past 8 years?
HayteStreet 2 years ago
So because I guessed your age because you use immature language and slander on a former US President, that automatically makes me a fanboy? Let me re-guess your age: 8.
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
i could care less how old you think I am or if you approve of the language I use, it doesn't change the fact that you are a fucking idiot for supporting George bush.
HayteStreet 2 years ago
I never once said I supported George W. Bush. Paranoia has seeped into your brain and has corrupted your mind, but your from the worst city in the world so I can see why. When did I ever say I supported George W. Bush?
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
Well stated that the slander of bush wasn't appropriate. That sounds pretty close to support of bush.
HayteStreet 2 years ago
Because slandering any President is inappropriate. It's something only children do or adults with mental disorders. I will admit Bush made a lot of mistakes and I will also tell you I do not like Barack Obama or what he's doing to this country, but I'm not immature enough to call him something like "a fuckin douche."
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
You should be careful before you use such an absolute as "slandering any president is inappropriate". If a german in nazi germany slandered hitler would that have been inappropriate? I don't think so.
HayteStreet 2 years ago
But then again if that happened, that German would be rounded up and shot on the spot. That's not how we do things in the US. It never happened under Bush and believe it or not, it won't even happen under Obama.
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
See now you have changed your argument.
Whereas you originally stated that they should be free from slander simply because they are presidents, now your saying that its because their actions as president have not justified slander. So now that you've we've deduced your original statement incorrect, we can discuss this one.
I think destroying the bill of rights with the patriot act and lieing to go into a war that we started illegally justifies criticism.
HayteStreet 2 years ago
I didn't change my argument but perhaps I need to be a little bit more slow for you. No one deserves to be called "a fuckin douche" because only children call each other those things. I don't agree with what Obama is doing, but I still respect him because he's the President. That's the problem with Libertarians, they are borderline fascists. If a non-Libertarian is President, that makes him fair-game for people like you.
As for your point: What lies to go to war? What are you talking about?
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
Why should presidents get any more respect then anyone else? I respect people for their actions, not because of their position of authority. Patriotism is just as dogmatic and irrational as religion. To respect someone just because they have power is borderline cowardice.
By the way I'm not libertarian, I'm not anything. It doesn't take a libertarian to see that bush and obama are both douches.
And i'm refering to the WMD lies, but that discussion will become redundant.
HayteStreet 2 years ago
Because Presidents are leading an entire nation and I respect Obama for his position, not because of what he's doing. I agree that he's not fixing the economy and his campaign was built on lies. People like you are what's wrong with America. People who say that patriotism and religion is irrational. Those are things Alex Jones would say.
If you're not a Libertarian, why do you talk and act like one and have a disturbing obsession with Ron Paul?
Plus we found the WMDs in Iraq last summer.
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
HITLER WAS LEADING AN ENTIRE NATION!
THE FOUNDING FATHERS WHERE LIBERTARIAN!
WE PUT SADAM IN POWER AND SOLD HIM ALL OF HIS WEAPONS!
And ron paul is the only politician that still seems to give a damn about the people of this country, whether I aggree with everything he sayes or not.
HayteStreet 2 years ago
Don't be stupid. You have an obsession with Hitler too and you should know that Saddam rose to power the same way that Hitler did; legally. He wiggled through every bureacuratic loophole through the Ba'ath Party instead of the National Socialist German Worker's Party.
If people thought that Ron Paul cared about them, why'd he come in dead last in all the primaries? Every rational person knows that Ron Paul is crazy and borderline dangerous alongside his anti-American comrade Alex Jones.
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
Rp came in last bc the election wasnt fair, as it hasnt been for awhile. I observed Pauls campaign and the way he and his supporters were treated was wrong. RP is not crazy or dangerous lol, and when did we find the WMD? woulda been useful 10 years ago!
IVDRIP 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul is a piece of shit, any right-wing politician is a piece of shit, and democrats (including Obama) are moderate pieces of shit and not true leftists.
By the way, Nationalism IS stupid, I am a citizen of the Earth and pledge loyalty to no state.
Fuck imperialism and capitalism.
elsamuraiguapo 2 years ago
@elsamuraiguapo Wow! I hope people as stupid as you don't vote... although that would explain Bush and Obama.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@sabaton4life1
Name one thing Ron Paul has said that does not follow the US Constitution. Name one time Ron Paul voted for an unconstitutional bill. If this makes him crazy and dangerous, than so were the founding fathers. There is very little hope for this country with uneducated fools like you voting.
jcbruce2900 2 years ago 3
Agreed!
IVDRIP 2 years ago
we have way more serious issues to deal with in here than bad language, so only adults with mental disorders swear? and children? you should really choose your words more carefully.
SLANDER: Anything spoken about an individual that is false and malicious that ridicules them or damages their reputation.
IVDRIP 2 years ago
Do you have a point? Or better yet, do you have logic?
sabaton4life1 2 years ago
do you or dont you support him?
IVDRIP 2 years ago
That's how impotent the zionist controlled media feels when they have to go to these methods to drive people away from the seriousness and importance of Ron Paul message.
ficote72 2 years ago 4
It is incredible how the US media goes so low suporting such disgusting and unpatriotic acts, supporting this british jewish crap comming from overseas to bash one of our few honest leaders left in congress.
I saw Rachel in the democratic channel promoting this piece of sh*t movie.
ficote72 2 years ago
dude it was a joke, lighten up?
natebooce 2 years ago
They are still trying to attack Paul.
x0fx3 2 years ago
But, she won't have him on to talk about the economy.
tomrdee 3 years ago 9