Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Supreme Court is a FRAUD its set up to protect the wealthy not the poor

    The poor have no constitutional righs in AMERICA the court should be shut down

    the legal system in america is a criminal enterprise

  • Babble on...

  • Comment removed

  • Breyer is an anti-constitution globalist. "Judicial independence" is a euphemism for "judicial activism"--legislating from the bench. Breyer's dissent on DC vs Heller is a perfect example of his contempt for the constitution. As a lawyer he should know that he can't possible know what James Madison was thinking regarding the right to bear arms.

    A Clinton appointee recommended by Ted Kennedy is all I really need to know.

  • Fake.

  • This dork is insane. Clinton found a perfect freak to rape the Constitution while he sweet talks it.

  • stephen breyer is the comedian and the wise one of the justices which makes him that much better

  • As a Jew in power, what does he say about Israel?

  • THANK YOU JUSTICE BREYER,  STEVE, PATIENCE FAITH AND REASON. GOD BLESS THE WORLD...... SINCERELY, PATRICIA A. HARTMAN

  • Comment removed

  • One problem w18:45ish quoting other countries in rulings is that our country originated on Christian principles as our documents show. Unalienable rights given by our CReator. English common law was based on likewise. THAT was what our forefathers created as law for our land. So when you start using reasoning derived from aetheistic nations who share not the idea of inaliendabelrights given by our country that our land is governened by in those documents, you curse our land.

  • @combatvetlawstudent you also go away from the constutution and declaration of Independence which derives from the plain statement that humans have inalienable rights iven BY OUR CREATOR that cannot be refused, then to use reasoning outside such principles is to deny our original documents this land was created on!

  • @combatvetlawstudent Not all nations share the idea of our documents that govern our land. So to persuade with aethiestic non constitutional principle ideas is to go against the oath of teh Constitution each judge takes.

  • 18:45 ish He says the citation in a ruling is NOT binding. Well it still is there for pursuasive effect. SO if in a case someone quotes or rules several citations or references to multiple foreign citations on an issue it HAS its effect. Kicking a door in while politely saying "can I come in?" is very similar to plain ol forcing in a decision. Consider accumulative affect as a form of binding.

  • excellent work!

  • Justice Breyer is a great judge and a great teacher. Thanks for this terrific video.

  • Who could possibly hate stepehen breyer? He's wonderful!

  • The justices are like rockstars. I wish I could be a justice one day; could you imagine all the chicks I'd get?

  • @plasticine86 You too could bang Sandra Day O'Connor.

  • i concur with the tie comment.

  • That's really funny. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that his tie is usually always under a robe, so he's not used to making sure it looks okay after the knot.

  • the description says "In 1990 he was appointed an appellate court judge by President Carter." This has to be a typo...

  • Stephen Breyer is one of the best and open-minded judges.

    Thanks for the video!

  • great vid...but he needs to learn how to wear a tie correctly.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more