Physics is about how objects react to each other... for exemple, if some object fall to the ground, it wont just fall flat... it will bounce, slide, tumble... If you cant crash in some object, it's because it wasn't meant to be a solid component... but I guess am the only one to have said this.
excuse me but driving through objects like a ghost, isn't fun, and I'm pretty sure there are newer racing games with better car physics, so screw NR2003
I love how when he is offroad you can see the car respond to every little imperfection while he tries to demonstrate that the game has bad physics. Irony at its best.
Havok Physics are the best physics and it's more greater when combined with Euphoria Dynamic Motion Synthesis (Euphoria is not a physics engine, it just adds more life into existing Physics Engine). And much better with DMM and PhysX
Crytek and Source are some really good physics engines. Its takes a bit of work to have great physics in a game. Water physics in general are extremely hard to make true to life..
Flatout's physics aren't realistic at all (pretty cool though :))
NR2003 does have realistic physics.
Never played TOCA, so it's hard to compare.
GT Legends has realistic physics.
And Nascar Sim Racing's physics seem very similar to NR2003's.
Of course, I'm not talking about the eye-candy physics, but I;m talking about the racing physics. You're not supposed to hit stuff and go off the track :)
Indeed. And even so, great games do definitely not have to have realistic physics to be fun. Fun is not defined, I think by even a fraction of the gaming community, as "as realistic as possible." If it were, we'd probably just go and play outdoors instead of play video games. :-D
Video games don't have to be realistic, they have to be fun to play. Check the physics in Vice City for example - they are kinda poor and not realistic, yet, the game is fun. Its the same for many old games like Re-Volt.
I didn't play nascar for example, but I assume it has good driving physics, they might not be based on a complex physical model, but they still work. Physics is not only object-object but also interaction between object and scene, and that is what results in good gameplay.
if you like gta vice try gta4. its way more fun becouse of the physics. things blow up alot more realistic. people are haning from doors and are draged along when you drive away and people react wya better when they are shot
its still the same game but enhanced becouse of the physics. thus imroving gameplay and fun.
i agree not all games need physics(realistic tertis o dear) but it generally makes games look and play better
actually.. I own GTA4 (I bought it directly on release day for xbox), and I didn't complete it yet. If you check my profile you can see that I made lots of VC and SA stuff (not everything is on youtube tho, but I made alot). Personally, I think that GTA4 ruined GTA with its physics, because what once began as a game, controlled by gameplay, turned into a physics sandbox. But maybe thats just me..
Whoopee. So you can drive through signs in NR. Big deal. In Nascar '08, your car practically STICKS TO THE GROUND. In some cases, I have seen the car front bumper go below ground. And this is for the PS2. O.o
PHYSICS ARE NOT ONLY CRASHING OBJECTS, there are a lot of games that you can crash everything but the driving techinics sux. NR2003 Season has a realistic driving physic.
realistic? This game is everything but realistic xD... Car driving physics suck in this game. GTA 4 has probably the most realistic driving physics yet...
@krele14 I Have GTA 4, been there, done that. Have played Forza and many of the Gran Turismos, and Grid, Burnout Paradise and Revenge, Split Second, as well as Flatout Head On... I'm pretty sure I know my stuff.
MrFishSticks says the person who made a video is stupid but MtFishSticks can't even make a video. All MrFishSticks can do is insult people who can do things. Now who is really the stupid one?
i dont make videos coz i dont wanna fill youtube with pointless videos like this, i leave the video making to the ppl who can actually make videos, unlike this guy
i mean seriously NSR2003 vs Flatout? id get it if u compared how realistic the physics are by comparing games like cellfactor vs HL2 but this...
If you can understand in the last couple of years NR03 had great Phyiscs for its time, but now the updates are numerous and there are soo many better GPUS that can handle better things in games.
so you can knock down roadside objects in flatout. so what, you got traction control for babies. that scream. all the fucking time while you're trying to think.
What the fuck is this about? This is nothing to do with game physics...we're talking about the handling of the car, not crashing into scaffolding...Jesus tonight...what a clown
To the person who said GT racing is harder...you really don't know what it's like to try to overtake and avoid disaster when racing in a pack that can include dozens of cars, and making a turn in the middle of a 3-wide with cars both in front of you and behind. Compare that to following the exact same racing line every bloody lap, and being too afraid to overtake someone because you don't want to bump the other guy with your precious car.
ya the cone hitting is my #1 priority when buying a racing game......wtf ur an idiot...NR03 was made to sim nascar and u rarely see peeps hit cones in nascar anyhow thats obviously not what its about, even though u think so
SirPef... you do realize that when people say NR2003 has "great physics", they're not talking about rigid body physics of trackside objects, right? Who cares if you can knock over road cones? That's not the point of physics in racing games (With the exception of the flatout series.) NR2003 is said to have great physics because the cars handle very realistically and react as a real car would.
Bravo SirPef. SimBin makes the most realistic sims. GT racing is far more harder than going left in roundabouts. Ovals are boring and useless for racing. I appreciate you for trying to set these rednecks straight. I also have ToCA 3 and it's a great game.
Weird physics!Oh damn!My eyes,my eyes!Nooo!
Hunter666MJ 1 month ago
lol just wasted 4 minutes of my life 1 minute was good but the rest awfull
like the start HES DRIVING 1minute thrugh (lol worst english ever) stuff
SuperDeadNoob 7 months ago
So running over a sigh makes a game realistic?
58tag 9 months ago
You mean Comparing Video Game collisions.
TA1LGATER 1 year ago
Physics is about how objects react to each other... for exemple, if some object fall to the ground, it wont just fall flat... it will bounce, slide, tumble... If you cant crash in some object, it's because it wasn't meant to be a solid component... but I guess am the only one to have said this.
Poodleinacan 1 year ago
excuse me but driving through objects like a ghost, isn't fun, and I'm pretty sure there are newer racing games with better car physics, so screw NR2003
funnyguy3D 1 year ago
LOLOLOL
use of physics=crasing object only??
That is shallow......
DarkExternalHeart 1 year ago
YES GAME NEED TO BE REALISTIC!!!! FULL PHYSICS!! ;OOOO
zelatur 1 year ago
Video games DO NOT need to be realistic... If you want something to be realistic go outside -.-'
chaosproduction 1 year ago
I love how when he is offroad you can see the car respond to every little imperfection while he tries to demonstrate that the game has bad physics. Irony at its best.
dsi24 1 year ago
Flatout! yeah!
BrodinBrothers22 1 year ago
@BrodinBrothers22 that not flatout
96Gmoder 1 year ago
@96Gmoder Then what does the big letters at 1:53 say?!
BrodinBrothers22 1 year ago
@BrodinBrothers22 oh that... but first race game its not flatout
96Gmoder 1 year ago
If you want to see real physics type in Big Rigs Over The Road Racing!
MrAgentMoo 1 year ago
I would say that Crytek just beat Valve at physics with CryEngine 3. Search on CryEngine 3 on youtube
weeruz 2 years ago
no it didnt
cardzone1000 2 years ago
Havok Physics are the best physics and it's more greater when combined with Euphoria Dynamic Motion Synthesis (Euphoria is not a physics engine, it just adds more life into existing Physics Engine). And much better with DMM and PhysX
BassamDaSonicLuva200 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i like peeing 8=D--------------------
Robro345 2 years ago
I like drawing faces that look a lot like penises 8=D
ssbmfan4 2 years ago
Best physics are on endorphin\euphoria games.
Gta IV
Star Wars: The Force Unleashed
Backbreaker
Red Dead Redemtion
wyattsawesome 2 years ago
Actually, that's just animation. Yeah sure they are generated on the fly, it still doesn't handle physics.
Personally, digital molecular matter looks cool to me.
001HK0 2 years ago
Facebreaker?
divinegod102 2 years ago
@wyattsawesome no half life is
alloriafan 2 years ago
Crytek and Source are some really good physics engines. Its takes a bit of work to have great physics in a game. Water physics in general are extremely hard to make true to life..
AWWWWTF 2 years ago
half-life 2 has the best physics
sweet10122 2 years ago
red faction 3
a01killer 2 years ago
That's not physics, it's collision detection.
Danny77uk 2 years ago
Comment removed
OGMO11 2 years ago
Physics is applied collision detection combined with Newton's laws and some rotational math and integral calculus.
cyborgtroy 2 years ago
yup
OGMO11 2 years ago
Flatout's physics aren't realistic at all (pretty cool though :))
NR2003 does have realistic physics.
Never played TOCA, so it's hard to compare.
GT Legends has realistic physics.
And Nascar Sim Racing's physics seem very similar to NR2003's.
Of course, I'm not talking about the eye-candy physics, but I;m talking about the racing physics. You're not supposed to hit stuff and go off the track :)
ektrules 2 years ago
do it better
connibonni 3 years ago
This is so lame.
When talking about physics in racing games its about physics between the tires on the car and the road and such..
Not hitting things
sasamsa 3 years ago
Indeed. And even so, great games do definitely not have to have realistic physics to be fun. Fun is not defined, I think by even a fraction of the gaming community, as "as realistic as possible." If it were, we'd probably just go and play outdoors instead of play video games. :-D
bikutorusan 3 years ago 12
who els noticed all the plates tell the same way in that second game. pre coded whoo
and its kinda fun you yell games need to be realistic and then throw in flatout
yusthavinfun 3 years ago
are you dumb???
ZooLLea 3 years ago
I Loled at The cones :)
GuthixProduction 3 years ago
Video games don't have to be realistic, they have to be fun to play. Check the physics in Vice City for example - they are kinda poor and not realistic, yet, the game is fun. Its the same for many old games like Re-Volt.
I didn't play nascar for example, but I assume it has good driving physics, they might not be based on a complex physical model, but they still work. Physics is not only object-object but also interaction between object and scene, and that is what results in good gameplay.
JayFoxRox 3 years ago
if you like gta vice try gta4. its way more fun becouse of the physics. things blow up alot more realistic. people are haning from doors and are draged along when you drive away and people react wya better when they are shot
its still the same game but enhanced becouse of the physics. thus imroving gameplay and fun.
i agree not all games need physics(realistic tertis o dear) but it generally makes games look and play better
yusthavinfun 3 years ago
actually.. I own GTA4 (I bought it directly on release day for xbox), and I didn't complete it yet. If you check my profile you can see that I made lots of VC and SA stuff (not everything is on youtube tho, but I made alot). Personally, I think that GTA4 ruined GTA with its physics, because what once began as a game, controlled by gameplay, turned into a physics sandbox. But maybe thats just me..
JayFoxRox 3 years ago
i love flatout such a great game
nicko12341 3 years ago
Crysis
Grid
warmonger (free from nvidia)
far cry 2
Those are the games with good physics
All the rest are alright but unbelivable
warmonger is almost 100% believable
And its FREE!!!!
tinymouse2 3 years ago
Half Life 2 you fool. Great physics (except for a few huge bugs).
ChickenAttackForce 3 years ago
The physics are ok
But there's no good examples of it
Just some barrels and a see-saw
No destructible scenery like in crysis and no damage to cars or anything
tinymouse2 3 years ago
what about GTA4? getting shoot out of speeding vehicles isn't a normal physics.. or starwars with that whatever DMM..
zaorine636 3 years ago
I have NR1999, and it's... Well, there's no physics. Your car sticks to the ground. But at least they tried for damage modelling.
cyborgtroy 3 years ago
3:57 is not really realistic. pilot body should be torn apart and lots of blood and guts everywhere.
iwantcoolname 3 years ago
Whoopee. So you can drive through signs in NR. Big deal. In Nascar '08, your car practically STICKS TO THE GROUND. In some cases, I have seen the car front bumper go below ground. And this is for the PS2. O.o
clearedtoengage 3 years ago
you should check out crysis! its not a racing game but you wont believe your eyes
skatetolive101 3 years ago
you're a dick
m8inlondon 3 years ago
WHOA! that Nascar game has amazing physics!!!
wafflemonster2 3 years ago
PHYSICS ARE NOT ONLY CRASHING OBJECTS, there are a lot of games that you can crash everything but the driving techinics sux. NR2003 Season has a realistic driving physic.
camargo152 4 years ago 27
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nobody is going to believe what a moron like camargo152 who can't spell says.
Jockobono 4 years ago
Joo got qwn,pwn and own by the youtube community.
ricy209 3 years ago
Best physics is euphoria
ixlikexCookies69 3 years ago
@camargo152
realistic? This game is everything but realistic xD... Car driving physics suck in this game. GTA 4 has probably the most realistic driving physics yet...
krele14 1 year ago
@krele14 Are you joking!?
NukeMyHouse 1 year ago
@NukeMyHouse
Not at all. Play it first, then make your assumptions, sir =)
krele14 1 year ago
@krele14 I Have GTA 4, been there, done that. Have played Forza and many of the Gran Turismos, and Grid, Burnout Paradise and Revenge, Split Second, as well as Flatout Head On... I'm pretty sure I know my stuff.
NukeMyHouse 1 year ago
@NukeMyHouse Try Rigs of Rods. its a soft body physics game that you can download on youre computer. you can crush a car into a wall!
befindox7 9 months ago
@befindox7 I have it. lol
NukeMyHouse 9 months ago
@NukeMyHouse woah! i dont.. : (
befindox7 9 months ago
flatout ftw
xtremie 4 years ago 4
this video sucks asshole
BTight16 4 years ago
Nascar Racing Season 2003 is renowned for it's driving physics. Not for it's ability to entertain clowns who can't keep their car on the road.
If you disagree, listen to what a real nascar driver has to say:
youtube watch?v=TYYLL9lxZng
01DOGG01 4 years ago 2
no offense but the person who made this is as stupid as they get
MrFishSticks 4 years ago
MrFishSticks says the person who made a video is stupid but MtFishSticks can't even make a video. All MrFishSticks can do is insult people who can do things. Now who is really the stupid one?
fepris 4 years ago
i dont make videos coz i dont wanna fill youtube with pointless videos like this, i leave the video making to the ppl who can actually make videos, unlike this guy
i mean seriously NSR2003 vs Flatout? id get it if u compared how realistic the physics are by comparing games like cellfactor vs HL2 but this...
MrFishSticks 4 years ago
and just for the record i respect the videos that deserve respect
MrFishSticks 4 years ago
MrFishSticks Is a douche
Michaelarson 3 years ago
If you can understand in the last couple of years NR03 had great Phyiscs for its time, but now the updates are numerous and there are soo many better GPUS that can handle better things in games.
saselite14 4 years ago
Whole lot of effort for nothing. Like people are saying, you've completely missed the point.
eggs07 4 years ago
stupid stupid stupid.
so you can knock down roadside objects in flatout. so what, you got traction control for babies. that scream. all the fucking time while you're trying to think.
especially all the babies on youtube..
its going to drive me crazy som day..
dejawolf 4 years ago
hmm..i dont think you race with 30+ people in GT games do you?
kornholio200 4 years ago
Hmmm...what's so good about Toca? You hit a sign...2 seconds later the exact same sound comes up over and over again.
Misainzig 4 years ago
What the fuck is this about? This is nothing to do with game physics...we're talking about the handling of the car, not crashing into scaffolding...Jesus tonight...what a clown
DoctorMeatDic 4 years ago
To the person who said GT racing is harder...you really don't know what it's like to try to overtake and avoid disaster when racing in a pack that can include dozens of cars, and making a turn in the middle of a 3-wide with cars both in front of you and behind. Compare that to following the exact same racing line every bloody lap, and being too afraid to overtake someone because you don't want to bump the other guy with your precious car.
CX1329 4 years ago
ya the cone hitting is my #1 priority when buying a racing game......wtf ur an idiot...NR03 was made to sim nascar and u rarely see peeps hit cones in nascar anyhow thats obviously not what its about, even though u think so
AJFay77 4 years ago
SirPef... you do realize that when people say NR2003 has "great physics", they're not talking about rigid body physics of trackside objects, right? Who cares if you can knock over road cones? That's not the point of physics in racing games (With the exception of the flatout series.) NR2003 is said to have great physics because the cars handle very realistically and react as a real car would.
UPSLynx 4 years ago
Bravo SirPef. SimBin makes the most realistic sims. GT racing is far more harder than going left in roundabouts. Ovals are boring and useless for racing. I appreciate you for trying to set these rednecks straight. I also have ToCA 3 and it's a great game.
Plisken1986 5 years ago
i have all the games in this video and nascar 2003 and toca 3 are the best
Twister243 5 years ago