Added: 5 years ago
From: meankitty42
Views: 753,339
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,133)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 00:36 Respect My Authoritaay!!! Abraham Lincoln is a MONSTER!

    It was in Stealth. Just sayin.

  • Respect to the most powerful navy in history. 

  • Comment removed

  • respect from Russia

  • @Ololoer huh.....dont see that every day, scratch that every decade

  • Its kinda funny that " Hollywood " gets its ideas for movies and tv shows like " Battlestar Galactica " and " Andromeda ascendant " from this type of ship.

  • no it was the glare of the sun on the canopy

  • Did he take photo at 4:59 ?

  • Super! Cool video

  • It sad for me to think that this single aircraft carrier has 3x more firepower than the Royal Danish Airforce (RDAF)

    good thing is we are allies...

  • @JVC7400 ha btw we have 11 of these, better stay allies lol jk just messin with ya we need all the allies we can get nowadays

  • USA BITCHES!!!!

    (random ignorant red-neck comment)

  • Nice video with nice Music

  • Yes, that's right, push that 15,000 kg F/A-18 Super Hornet from one end of the deck to the other with manpower!

  • uh can someone tell me why these freakin Somali pirates are allowed to terrorize the oceans? Here's the answer--blow them out of the water with a missle. All it will take is a few times.....problem solved! No more pirates.

  • @gustfront180

    It's pretty easy to tell that the solution to the Somali pirate problem isn't just: nuke 'em. If the U.S. hadn't gone and messed up stuff over there in the first place, then those young Somalis would still be fishing, and not taking vessels hostage to make a living!

  • @Kosmachevskaia Ay you're gonna blame Somali problem on USA ? LOL typical

  • @OlderG0ds

    Well, I'd hate to contradict you (love your uploads), but I am blaming it at least partially on the U.S.A.

  • @Kosmachevskaia ok you're probably right about that. I just laugh when people blame U.S for literally everything bad in the world.

  • @OlderG0ds

    I laugh too... some of it is just outrageous stuff.

  • So impressive! Wow!!

  • cool

  • @TheNationalarmy Get real china has about 40 submarines in the chinese sea and maybe thousends of anti ship missles. Besides that, if youre going to go to war you got to have a credit account from,,,,,,,, china.

    Your simply twenty years to late.

  • nimitz class is one of the best things i love about the military. i get excited just by seeing its picture. then i remember its intended for killing and my mood changes :(

    what a brilliant engineering machine they are, i wish they could be turned into some civilian use

  • Turn the damn music off...look to see the aircraft and not the nasty ass music

  • TY FOR PROTECTING MY FREEDOM

  • good video. Love watching it. Bravo..

  • What an amazing ship! Too bad the US doesn't operate her anymore..

  • @bieberfan Its widely accepted the Basques are the oldest and original Europeans....science doesnt lie....

  • One nimitz class carrier and you can conquer half of Africa.

    "United States Navy" it stands for "We can deliver 760 fighter aircrafts up to your ass"

  • how come this video has 67 dislikes? What the fuck is there to dislike?

  • hi

    I just want to take a TGV

    have anice WE

    GG

  • 3:28 <3

  • i'm closer to a liberal/pacifist more than anything else I can think of, but this video still gives me a hard-on for the US military

  • @Zen0Ph0bus Russia and China does not allow for dissent or protest of government. Try speaking out in Russia or China and see what happens to you. What has Russia or China done for world peace or for mankind? what has the Ruskies and Chicoms donated to the world? I remember the Ruskies along with the East Germans shooting innocent civilians trying to flee to the west and freedom. Russia supporting terrorists nations like Iran and Syria, Cuba, China supporting N. Korea, proof of savages.

  • the best clip 0:37 to 0:51

  • Any hows, how did this video get some of us to talk nuclear warfare - all I see is a modern carrier with improved cababilities. Self Sustaining and no better then my work enviroment - well, maybe it is better - Room and Board with Medical paid and a salary to boot in exchange to see the world at the Low Ready. Not Bad.

  • Last i recall, it was Rumsfield who voiced publcily that he was for small arms nulcear aresenals, about the size current artillery shells. Do they exist, probably, yet this are the old type with lower yields - can they be improved - obviously so.

  • didn't china just make a anti ship missle? nuke this nuke that - us has always planned and made runs on nuking just about every city in the world - think us is the only one - any hows, they feared retaliation - even against korea! get off the next stop - nukes equals retaliation equals escalation equals annhaliation - lets do it and see who stays standing i like that mentality.

  • @Phantasmos uhh, yea, that's what the cold war was about. Soviet Union had nukes and US had them. it's called detante, or detante. something like that. either way nobody wanted to launch nukes.

  • @goodfella21f, exactly, so I am still trying to figure out how Iran will attack with a nuke if it knows there will be retaliation? Or anyone else for that matter - as for a dirty bomb, US plants them everyday around the war. If its not a bomb, its a germ. Besides, i recall under Cheney, there were some nuke triggers that ended in Taiwan - I wonder if they were meant for Iran?

  • @Phantasmos a lot of countries have used germ warfare and dirty bombs, and also biological warfare. US mostly sticks to conventional weapons, we used the atomic bomb just in one war. We just treat Iran like we treat any other country. If Iran launches nukes then we'll char their desert. simple as that. what's not to get????

  • @goodfella21f, exactly, didn't the US just admit to germ warfare against some central american country for 'test' purposes? How was that conventional? It really don't matter, nuclear is a better money maker than oil anytime. Ask Germany, France and Russia who benefs from Irans current Nuclear Plant and ask Russia about its venture in Brazil Nuclear Program or China about its ethanol program with Brazil - Quite embarrassing a third world country can produce & export ethanol and US Don't Know How!

  • @Phantasmos that wasn't germ warfare, we weren't at war with Guatemala... it was an experiment, but certainly not warfare. and US does produce ethanol... we're doing it with corn... but the incentive for us Americans is not as high to produce these green fuel sources, we're lagging cuz we're still a huge oil producer (from a percentage basis), but we are developing green technology.

  • @goodfella21f, oh, my bad, everyhting US does is for the good of mankind. There never is an intrest of such testing. That proves the US is hyprocritical of its genetics research - do as you are told, not as you see. Next germ testing should be conducted in New York - population control - YA! think! The point is, everyone draws their own boundary. Brazil broke the addiciton and the US tried to jump on them to be 1st in line for purchase of ethanol? Obviously US can not/will not produce Ethanol!

  • @Phantasmos no nation has donated more food, water purification systems, money, clothing, tents, medicine, farm equipment, blood, sweat, tears and treasure FOR OTHER NATIONS than the U.S. in the last 100 yrs. No nation even comes close. The U.S. has never keep any land for herself. No nation has liberated more people and more countries than the U.S. No nation has sent more volunteers around the world to assist people in need. The U.S. military has been the most generous of all militaries.

  • @canaryman69, oh my bad. The US installs puppet goverments like Saddam until he decided to break ranks. Like the Ayatolla that got overthrown by revolt that led to the Iranian Hostages. Oh, did I forget the Waepons for hostage for drugs money laundering scheme led by a True Patriot that happened to be a Marine - some Col North(?).

  • @Phantasmos you are a moron, the U.S. did NOT install Saddam. The U.S. did NOT install the Ayatollah Homeini. The U.S. was a friend of the Shaw Of Iran you moron not any ayatollas. You are free to leave the U.S. anytime and I am sure you can run your communist hating mouth off in Russia or China.

  • @canaryman69, the US aided them unto power - same differrence. Or do you think several years ago, some European nations withdrew their drafts from US banks before the market collapse! I had no Idea facing reality like living within my means and having to get taxed, so that Patriotic Citizens living on Plastic could affect my savings, no matter how meager. I had no Idea that made me Communist.

  • @Phantasmos The U.S. DID NOT aid Saddam into power, he took it over himself. He shot his relative and rose to power. The U.S. had nothing to do with it. You really can't be that much of a moron are you?

  • @canaryman69 as for the Shaw, I was making sure you knew a bit about histroyed. before I continued. All in short, we each have our opinions, we shall wait until we find out how got it right - shall we say - six months?

  • @Phantasmos You are a moron and are free to leave, please do. Try speaking out in Russia or China and see what happens to you moron. The U.S. is the most generous nation and has been for the last 100 yrs. The U.S. is not perfect but Russia and China are NOT model nations. The U.S. may suck but the whole world sucks a whole lot more than the U.S. Man you live in a fantasy world. You need to learn about the communists atrocities and the brutality before you go and run your mouth off.

  • @canaryman69, it seems that verytime the US military gets involved, everything goes wrong. Whenever Kongress gets involved, it involves Corporate America, it was never about the Citizen, as for keping land, why do that when you can make a regime change - oh that didn't work either - oops. All I can tell you is that you can never enforce or force a people unto submission. Interventionism as coind by US and GB does not work.

  • @Phantasmos I am not defending our government, I am defending our nation. The U.S. is the most generous. The U.S. corporations and charities and churches donate more food, clothing, medicine,tents, farm equipment, water purification sytems than all charities and corporations around the world combined. The U.S. government is also the most generous. The U.S. military has also supplied millions in time of need. You are a moron. Russia and China have not donated anything.

  • @canaryman69, In either case, I say again, lets find out where the marble lands in six months.

  • @Phantasmos we are not talking about the U.S. in decline, now, or in 6 months, that is another matter and I wouldn't disagree with you on that, even though I think it is alittle farther out than 6 months. We are talking about the generosity of the U.S. in the last 100 yrs.

  • @Phantasmos the U.S. still donates billions and the U.S. is broke, and I agree this is a silly policy but it just goes to show the generosity of the U.S. and the stupidity of the U.S. government.

  • @canaryman69 read your little convo about US vs the world, and I'm just glad someone other than me can see the whole picture. we've made mistakes, but on the whole, the world would be a much worse place had we not existed.

    it makes me despair to see people, especially Americans, bash our great country, seeing only the bad that the news portrays while being blind to the massive historical good we've done. reading your comments made me feel less lonely, so thanks =)

  • @oldfrend thanks oldfrend, never stop believing in liberty, freedom, capitalism, individual rights. Do not stop defending this nation. Too many others that want to tear it down, jealousy is a horrible trait. The U.S. has done a lot of good in the last 100 yrs and Russia and China have not. Just remember our service members defending this land and its great and generous people. You owe it to them to defend them on sites such as this. Long live the U.S. The beacon of hope in the world. Cheers!

  • @canaryman69 well said

  • @RJF1966 thank you and long live the most generous and kind nation ever! The U.S. is still a beacon of hope in this cruel murderous world. Can you imagine what the world would be like if the U.S. had not existed in this time in history? We can thank our Founding Fathers and the U.S. Constitution and liberty, capitalism, freedom, and the hard working people that have come from all around the world. Would not want to live anywhere else. For all of it problems it is still the best. Cheers

  • @canaryman69 if it wasn't for the us someone else would have been in their shoes. So it would have been pretty much  a "same shit different day" situation.

  • @hantarex12 well nobody has donated aid around the world like the U.S. has. No nation has shed more blood sweat tears and treasure than the U.S. No nation has liberated more nation and more people than the U.S. No nation has donated more food, money, clothing, water, medicine, farm equipment, water purification systems than the U.S. no nations military has delivered more aid than the U.S. In the last 100 yrs the U.S. has been a force for good, now what has Russia or China done for the world?

  • @hantarex12 In the last 100 yrs. the private U.S. charities, churches, corporations, organizations and U.S. citizens has donated more aid than all nations. The U.S. government supported by the U.S. hard working tax payer has donated more than any other nation. Compare the last 100 yrs of the murderous communist Chinese and brutal communists Russians against what the generous U.S. has done around the world. NO COMPARISON! Can you imagine what the world would look like without the U.S.?

  • @canaryman69 No need to imagine that. Actually I’ve already told you, someone else would have been the sheriff! Instead, I can go back 1 or 2 hundred years ago when us was not around. Well the “murderous Chinese” and the “brutal Russians” where there, and as far as I know their story goes waaay back! So you have to give them some credit, they must have done something right in order for them to be around nowadays. Finally there is no such thing as charity. It never was & never will be…

  • @hantarex12 no body else has been the sheriff the last 100 yrs. So you can't take that away from the U.S. and the good it has done in the last 100 yrs. Russia and China have been around for thousands of years but what is their excuse for being so brutal, especially in the last 100 yrs.? What has Russia and China done for world peace? As far as charity, you mean the trillions of dollars and millions of tons of aid in the last 100 yrs. never reached anybody? where did it go?

  • @hantarex12 if Russia and China go way back, then what is their excuse for being so murderous in the last 100 yrs? what did they do that was right? why do I need to give some brutal nations credit for torture, starvation, gulags, brutality, enslavement? Credit! what do they get credit for? Certainly it cannot be for being generous, or peaceful and liberty loving. Waiting for you to tell us all what they did right, Cheers

  • They have done mistakes all right, but then again who haven’t? You keep saying about the last 100 years. I can’t remember a simple case (war at any scale) the last 100 years that US wasn’t somehow involved! And especially during war (sometimes also in peace time), all parties get brutal! Unless if you think that brutality is only for the “other guys”. What you are saying is combatable opinion. For example gulag. Yeah I know, shityplace just like the bay... See…?

  • @hantarex12 the U.S. does not target innocent civilians or woman and children and you know it. It is NOT the official U.S. Military or government policy to kill innocent people. We also give fair trials. In modern times or the last 100 yrs., why is it so hard for you to understand that the U.S. does not have political prisoners? The U.S. has been dragged into EVERY WAR in the last 100 yrs. that were started by communists, 3rd world dictators or muslim nations. The U.S. does not get brutal.

  • @canaryman69 Anyway this can go on for ever so, what I’m trying to say here is that if the other guy is communist or atheist or yellow or blue or whatever you wanna call it, that doesn’t make you a better person! So if US was not around, we would still hae survived as mankind… ;)

  • @hantarex12 there has been hundreds of wars in the last 100 yrs that the U.S. has had nothing to do with, so you are wrong again. Also GITMO Bay is not a brutal place. The Ragheads get their ETHNIC MEALS! Did you know that? did you know they were all provided a quaran and a prayer mat and first rate health care. The International Red Cross is at GITMO, The Red Cross is NOT allowed in Ruskie Gulags or Chicoms slave labor camps, why not? 

  • @hantarex12 I am not saying there would not be mankind in the last 100 yrs. but what I am saying is that you would speaking, German, Russian, or Japanese and you would be a slave. Communism would be the order of the day along with starvation, torture, no human or civil rights, NO INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS PERIOD! You can thank the U.S. for the world being just a little more civilized. The U.S. may suck but the whole world sucks a whole lot more than the U.S. now get back to your communist military.

  • @hantarex12 there are certain things that we know. We also know the Red Cross says GITMO is a good treatment facility. Please tell us what goes on at GITMO? there is no torture, the RAGHEADS get their excercise, showers, and RAGHEAD style clothing. They are givin personal hygiene supplies. Do you know what it costs per day to keep these terrorists alive? What would China or Russia or Iran do with them? I think you really need to do just a little research about GITMO.

  • srf1716,13102010.htm.mct4(qrl(­t1qsi(delta9.xnor.delta13.twtr­(blockedUser(ntds0005.nimitz(t­1zbk.and.t2zbk).icf1549khz.and­.ntds1549.while(icf1549khz.and­.norm(usb).not.ssb(usb(utc518)­.than(page0.gmt1719.invalidQue­ueNorm.n158ra(complex(cgf(nonN­ulAnsiCompiler).and.open(t1qrk­.not.t2qrk)t1zbm.and.closed(t2­qrk.not.t1qrk)t1zbm.fsk(t2zbm.­and.nimitz(t2qsi(t1snap.nor.t2­snap)))))))).tkpa(reed)$)))ngs­1.and(seNavyUnitedStatesScubaD­ivingZone(blue.nor.yellow));al­z524dgz

  • V-2 VLA ftw!

    At 1:30 you see some ILARTS action for a few seconds. Represent!

  • Love this video. 

  • I LOVE this video and have the highest admiration for all the men and women in the US and British Armed services....Thank You!

  • Keep wasting millions of man-hours in useless killing machines. Keep poluting the environment and spending billions of dollars.... well done america.

  • @nikos4free nuclear reactors dont use fuel buddy.... thus they dont pollute, this video is about the carriers not the jets

  • @iColorado303, I guess the used fuel from nuclear reactors are enviromental friendly which is why the US buries them on indian reservations. One rod lasts about 1 hundred years. Reactors have to produce energy and it has to be stored somehow for it to b used. Or why would Russia offer Iran rods for its nuclear reactor and take them back after used - because once used they are enriched and have other uses as well.

  • @nikos4free The Nimitz-class and other "useless killing machines" were built to keep the forces of communism from steam-rolling over the entire planet. You remember communism, right? It killed 80M people in Europe and Asia in a span of 80 years. Now just say, "Thank you, America and NATO" and the STFU. :)

  • @BloodofPatriots the communist Ruskies murdered 37 million of their own citizens and the Chicoms murdered over 77 million of their own citizens. Communism has enslaved billions in the last 80 yrs. After WW2 The brutal communist Ruskies became the new Nazi's and enslaved all of Eastern Europe. The Ruskies stole their resources. I remember the Ruskies shooting people in the back trying to flee to the west for freedom. I remember the Ruskies cheating on every treaty and at the olympics 9 times.

  • @nikos4free the Chicom Gooks and the brutal communist Ruskies were killers. Russia and China, no Bill Of Rights, no 2nd amendment, no 4the amendment, no right to protest, no right to assemble, no private property rights, no jury trial of peers, no presumption of innocence, no freedom of speech, no freedom of press, no right to privacy, no religious freedom, terrible human and civil rights records, millions have been in the Gulags and Chinese slave labor camps. Pathetic killers!

  • the black negro brothers are going to work it out, what does that mean? weird. as far as i know they are only good at smoking weed.

  • the 66 dislikes are muslims and communists

  • And one torpedo......

  • The Russian Navy has a giant nuclear torpedo designed to sink a US Navy Carrier. Once she fires it, there is nothing to stop her. Its bye bye 5,000 people and $2B

  • @AccordGTR lol

  • @AccordGTR

    if anyone use's a nuclear weapon it end's badly for the whole world

    it might be by by aircraft carrier but its by by russia has well

  • @monimstarfox Not necessarily, There would have to be an exchange of several hundred nuclear weapons's for the world to be affected.

    Several countries already have small tactical nuclear weapons that they can use on a limited basis. The Type 65 nuclear torpedo the Russian have has a yield of 20 kT, about the size of the WW2 atomic bombs dropped in Japan. It is only designed to take out an American carrier battle group, which carries nuclear weapons too.

  • @AccordGTR

    no there wouldnt one nuclear launch by one nation will trigger nuclear responses from all

    several hundred nuclear weapons for the world to be affected?????

    it only takes one to have everlasting effect on the atmosphere and a hand ful of modern day nukes can kill the planet's life.

    its not a matter of wether you carry nuclear weapons or not its about if you use it

    if russia does attack carrier's with this then expect a nuclear response

  • @monimstarfox there were nuclear airburst tests before, much bigger than the ones in service now. US, Israel, Pakistan and North Korea deploys many tactical nukes, with relatively small yields. France UK India USSR and China also probably have some that you can employ on a small area.

    A few high-altitude air bursts over the US will take every single vehicle, electronic and communication device via EMP blast wave.

    Russia has civilian population plans to survive a mass attack. US doesn't

  • @AccordGTR

    Test's and actual attack's are 2 different things

    look if any nation employ's a nuclear weapon

    even it is for emp purpose's its not has if america's going to sit on it's ass and let it happen

    its going to retaliate with nuclear weapons i dont know why you dont understand that?

    America's not going to sit while the former glory of the soviet union attack's its carrier fleet's or its nation

  • @monimstarfox Ur right but history shows US is always the aggressor. US always attacks first or provokes an attack. She's like a big bully showing people her big muscles and and doing fancy moves. But all that's doing is making everybody armed and ready so that when the bully comes around, they gonna chop his legs off right under him, when he least expects it. Hit-and-run, buddy, hit and run!

  • @AccordGTR

    the thing with is no one can hit and run a nuclear state

    were ever you go the affect's of a nuclear weapon will reach you even if your underground. The nukes right now are almost 50 times more powerful than the ones dropped in ww2. The u.s isnt always the agressor and the world's power's are on her side if you forgot what NATO was.

  • @monimstarfox Well, why do you think US is fighting an insurgency (Iraq, Afghan) now? Others like Iran, China and Russia will fight using clandestine and covert methods. Nobody will fight a big bully on a face-to-face basis.

    I was talking about tactical nukes. not the strategic ICBM warheads. They are smaller in size than the WW2 bombs but have similar yields. There are even nuclear weapons called NEUTRON bombs designed to have EMP and blast effects without the long-term radiation exposure

  • @AccordGTR

    well of course they wont they are coward's

    they like to hide behind children and women.

    a nuclear weapon is a nuclear weapon

    and the response is nuclear has well

  • @monimstarfox That's a typical ignorant response when you call the insurgents cowards. I bet u cannot even comprehend that other people think the US are cowards, preferring to fight with drones and smart bombs, hiding behind their firepower, kevlar, armor and other high tech stuff. Fact is, America can't stand casualties while her enemies have no such apprehension.

  • @monimstarfox Since WW2 the US has almost always been the aggressor via the CIA and Special Forces in almost every single conflict. U should study it. Read the book FIGHTING DIRTY: AMERICA'S COVERT WARS FROM HO CHI MIHN TO BIN LADEN by British military historian and former SAS Peter Harclerode. Its available on Amazon books.

    Many Americans do not know many troubling things about their govt cuz the mass media doesn't report it or if they do, Americans choose not to believe it.

  • @AccordGTR

    please name a few

  • @monimstarfox "pls name a few"?

    - Iraq was not the threat to the US that Bush described then to be in 2001; WMD, Al-qaeda links were grossly exaggerated if not fabricated. US created the insurgency by banning the ruling Baath party in reconciliation.

    - Aghan. US provoked USSR to invade in 1980. Then finance, armed, and trained 80,000 Mujahidin to fight them thru CIA and Pakistan ISI costing billions over 13 years. In the end, it was the Taliban that won and many became int'l terrorists.

  • @AccordGTR

    aghan is not a country

    afganistan is a haven for taliben especially in the toraborah region

    America is rich enough that it can throw around billion's of dollar's without flinching but that wasnt the case for the Russians

    hey it worked :)

  • @monimstarfox Fyi its called The Islamic Republic Of Afghanistan.

    Afghan. is the HOME of the Taliban.

    Afghan. is composed of more than 1000 tribes, mainly Uzbeks, Tajiks and majority Pushtun. Taliban r mainly Pushtun who and live in Southern and eastern Afghan. as well as the Northern province Pakistan.

    They "appeared" in 1994 and by May 1997 was recognized by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, UAE as the legitimate govt of Afghan. However, Northern Aliiance controlled the North

  • @AccordGTR

    yes i know what its called but for the sake of saving the amount of letter's that i can type i do not write it out fully.

    The Taliban did govern afganistan from 1996 but was overthrown in 2001 and regrouped in 2004.

    and FYI at the time of the Taliban control it was known has the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

  • @AccordGTR

    That's a very broad statement

    most russians now a days still believe that they are a competitor against america

    and that their military power is still the same has the soviet union

    when they are told that this is not true

    or even shown the number's like the fact that america's military budget is 650 billion plus compared to their 65 billion plus

    they deny it. There is propaganda in america but there is propaganda in russia has well

  • Comment removed

  • @AccordGTR you call us ignorant but you dont know that the attack's were done by people outside of Afghanistan and probably not part of the taliban? muslim extremism around the world has other source's since the Taliban does not have any of those "billions" only from america today

    They are mostly funded by IRAN

    not all terrorism comes from the Taliban alone.

    its not only muslim extremism its extremism in general that is a threat

    communism died with the soviet's

  • @monimstarfox were u talking about the 9/11 attacks...I know all about that.

    When the Taliban were in power, they stopped the Opium trade but when US invaded, the Taliban found that they can raise money to fight the US by taxing Opium growers.

    There is also a report that whatever the US pays to the southern tribes, part of it goes to the Taliban for protection

    Taliban don't really care what goes on outside of Afghan...they just want their autonomy

  • @monimstarfox As far as her allies, US has many cuz "development and democracy" revolves around free trade. However, many do not share the US military decisions. If you look at Afghan, there are 62 allies of the US but only a handful are in combat. The rest just show a token support but they do encounter casualties also.

    Fact is, US is the worlds largest proliferator of arms. They financed, armed and trained using Special Forces tactics 80,000 Mujahideen in the 80's that became terror groups

  • @AccordGTR

    first off we dont need 62 countries in one war

    unless this was a world war

    its not about whether they are going to fight with us in every war its whether or not we have their poltical and mutual agreement has friend's

    Russia has almost none in the world

    if any nation is a threat to america then it's a threat to europe has well

    has demonstrated by the attack's by terrorist's in Europe

    like the rise of the soviet union has well

    The mujahideen was made to combat the soviet's

  • @monimstarfox Russia has no friends??! I think she has more than the US because alomost all the "friends" of the US have diplomatic relations with Russia while US' enemies are friends with Russia, like Iran, North Korea, Syria, Libya and Cuba. Russia is no longer communist and there is no more Soviet Union, you know.

  • @AccordGTR

    the friend's that Russia have are either 3rd world countries

    developing nation's or very weak countries.

    America share's military tie's with the powerhouse's of Europe and Australia

    even if it is diplomatic atleast it is an ally.

    i know its not communist excuse me if i came out has such

    And cuba is under america's control they just dont know it yet.

  • @AccordGTR

    These mujahideen was funded by the cia

    and with this funding they managed to defeat the russian's

    it was a partial success since they ended up turning on the CIA

    but atleast the soviet's got their ass's handed to them

  • @monimstarfox Ur history is typical American ignorance. The Mujahidin did not "turn on" the CIA. The CIA was never their master, how can the "turn on them"? The Muj hates all infidels. CIA support of Muj was just part of Cold War with USSR.

    As a US citizen, do u agree ur taxpayers funds were used to give billions to Pakistan and Afghan during 70-80's for what, "defeating the Soviets?"

    It was Glasnosts, Perestroika and the Russian people that defeated the USSR, not Taliban, America or CIA

  • @AccordGTR

    in the proverbial way the Taliban did "turn on" the cia

    since has you said the CIA provided them with weapon's and money

    even though they do hate infidel's the CIA made the mistake of thinking that if they helped the taliban repel the communist invasion it would gain an ally.

    Dont forget Regan's call to take down the wall

    i think it began with the humiliation that the soviet's faced when their plan to take over Berlin failed with the Berlin airlift by the allies

  • @monimstarfox Pls do not confuse Taliban with Mujahidin. Taliban is a political/religious group that want autonomy in their homeland, something like the Jews with Israel.

    Taliban appeared after the Soviet-CIA war in Afghan. But many were former Muj who were trained by CIA/ISI or later passed on their deadly trade to sons and young Taliban.

    U do know that there were British and American Mujahidin fighting in Afghan. Any muslim who fights the infidel in the name of Allah can be a Mujahidin.

  • @AccordGTR

    Mujahidin are anyone who fight's for freedom

    you said it your self that the taliban want their autonomy in other words their freedom

    so they are Mujahidin so i never confused the two.

  • @monimstarfox I think your definition of "freedom" is different from other cultures. Maybe u believe freedom is pornography and alcoholism. They are expressly forbidden by Taliban or other cultures.

    Autonomy means free to govern in their region, right to levy taxes and manage resources without outside interference or control.

    For example, in my country Philippines, muslims have an autonomous region in the South but they are still Filipino's, just different tribal culture.

  • @AccordGTR

    i am trying to keep this conversation civil but yet you try to turn it into a fight

    inferiority complex much?

    when i say freedom i mean freedom from a foreign power in this case the "USA"

    i dont know were the hell you got porno or alcohol.

    Autonomy means the independence and freedom of one's action and also the right to self govern the taliban and the Mujahadeen are fighting for autonomy which is also freedom.

    Maybe your definitoni of freedom is different from other cultures

  • @monimstarfox Hehe no, no, I'm not trying to fight and I don't mean to provoke you. It's just that we have different paradigms or perceptions of what is true and I am just trying to understand you by clarification of what you mean.

    You seem to have this black-and-white view of the world and I am just trying to mention that there are grey areas.

    I studied and lived in the US for 10 years so its interesting seeing American's POV with other POV's of issue. Seems there is a large gap

  • @AccordGTR

    what am i seeing in black and white please tell me?

    you also seem to have this black and white view on america and it's action's throughout afganistan and iraq and a bit gullible to everything you hear on the news

  • @monimstarfox Uh, you're the 1 who wrote:

    - Afghan is a haven for Taliban (Hello! They live there! What u wanna do, kick them out of their homes?! Its like saying "Texas is a haven for cowboys")

    - Russia has no friends

    - Muj is fighting for freedom (u obviously took this from Wiki)

    - Muj turned on the CIA (They attacked Americans, not CIA)

    So many more you wrote that are not entirely accurate

    Peace!

    

  • @AccordGTR

    uh last time i checked the CIA was made up of americans

    or am i wrong?

    The Muj are fighting for freedom their name translated from arabic means almost the same has jihad.

    Russia has friend's but not has powerful has the friend's that America has that is what i meant in the beginning.

    so i am correct when i say Afganistan is a haven for the taliban?

    Reaffirming what i say is a bad way to try and win an argument

    and what's black and white about the Muj fighting for freedom?

  • @monimstarfox CIA works/hires not just Americans to do their fighting. They use mainly military or ex-military but will also hire civilians to work for them whether they be Pakistan, Afghan, Korean, Israeli, British... CIA doesn't follow the same rules as the US military obviously.

    Freedom fighters doesn't mean they are fighting for the same "freedom" as the George Bush freedom.

    I never said I am arguing, did I? I said i am clarifying ;-) U r free to believe what you want to believe

  • freedom fighter means in the Muj and taliban their struggle to throw out the foreign power's on their land's

    i never said it was the same freedom that George bush meant

    assuming something you dont know is a mistake.

    The CIA even though it does work with foreign countrie's and people it is controlled by the USA

  • @monimstarfox U said the Taliban are cowards because they hide. Hello?! Since when is fighting from a concealed position or "blending into the civilian population" cowardice? That is what US Special Forces also do and that is what they taught the Muj. to fight Russians.

    You think they are a coward to fight tanks, attack jets and helicopters??

  • @AccordGTR

    they are coward's because they hide behind mosque's, women and children

    special force's blend in with the civilian population not use them has human shield's

    they never attacked a jet

    they did attach apache's and abram's but the most of the shot's that they fired at these two vehicle's was from densely populated area's were if the american's were to counterattack there would be civilian casualties

    this makes them a coward

  • @monimstarfox I was a Corpsman with the 1st MarDiv in both Afghanistan, and Iraq, before I got wounded. Let me tell you, there are no cowards among the Taliban, or Al Qaeda. They are well trained, well equipped, and incredibly determined. They fight like demons. The worst thing we can do is underestimate them, and call them cowards.

  • @ExUSSailor

    i dont underestimate them at all and i thank you for your service

    its sometime's hard to call their action's courageous

    when they hide behind women and children

  • @monimstarfox Don't get me wrong, they're definitely evil. Anyone that can strap a bomb to a 12 year old kid, and send him into a crowded market is the DEFINITION of evil.

  • @ExUSSailor what's the definition of who nuked 2 city?

    Dont misunderstand me, im not justifing them.

    Im only saying America supported al quaeda when Russia attacked on Afganistan, now America is on al quaeda territory fighting against them, using the best war tecnology. Who is devil?

    Btw North Korea is very very more dangerous than al quaeda, but since they have nuclear bombs, nobody can attack 'em.

    It's sad to say, but only if u have nuke u have a chance to live without american opression.

  • @gennaman2bit Well, it wasn't Al Quaeda, but the Taliban we supported. However, I get your point. It makes me very sad to hear you use terms like "American oppression". Have you been to Afghanistan? Have you seen the theocratic Hell the Taliban turned that country into? I realize it's not a clear cut issue, but someone had to do something. I mean, girls weren't even allowed to go to school! As for N. Korea, looks like they may solve the issue by attacking the South first. "Sacred War", my ass!

  • @ExUSSailor Well, al quaeda is born at the end of Afghanistan war, America helped mujahidins and many of them signed up in al quaeda.

    Ok im wrong with term "American oppression", i meant "Nato oppression".

    Im italian and we have our guilt too!!

    I think more time nato soldiers will keep invasion in Afghanistan, more taliban will enlist in al quaeda.

    My granpa was called terrorist by fascists, now his name is wrote on a war memorial: from terrorist to hero!

    Who was terrorist?

  • @gennaman2bit At heart, I know you're right. I'm just conflicted about it, because I was there. It can be hard to admit that you watched good friends die, and get wounded for anything less than the right reasons.

  • @ExUSSailor Yeah I can understand.

    It's so sad to see how many soldiers die every day :( and it must be hard to follow orders knowing death is behind every corner at every moment.

    That's why I think wars must stop asap. But Im a visionary utopian I think :(

    My point was "it's hard to establish who is evil in war". Every country did and do shamefull things in past and present wars.

    Anyway I quote u, u was right:

    Anyone that can strap a bomb to a 12 year old kid is the DEFINITION of evil.

  • @gennaman2bit I agree, war must end. I think, in the end, who is wrong in a war is decided solely by who wins, and gets to write the history.

  • @ExUSSailor Sad but true!!

  • @monimstarfox You said "Muj fight for their freedom". They fight for Allah.

    Freedom for Taliban is "free from infidels"

    Freedom for Iraqi is No tyranny

    Freedom for Larry Flynt is Pornography

    Freedom for Jesus Christ is to be free from Sin

    Freedom for Nelson Mandela is "a free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities"

    Also, Autonomy is different from Independence when it comes to a country. Independence means a new country

  • @monimstarfox, it that was the case, then why are there not mutations after so many testing - three fold - above ground, below ground, underwater? Now, on the other hand, the US is the only country that thought of dropping one or two on Korea and considered dropping a run on China w/ Korea boundry.

  • @AccordGTR Yes, there is something to stop it. In fact, it will keep that torpedo (if it exists) from every being used. It's called a "Boomer", officially known as an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine carrying 24 Trident missiles with MIRV at 300-475 kt per warhead with a range of 7,500 miles. Oh, and we have over a dozen of them. If the Russian Navy every uses a nuclear torpedo on one of our carriers, say goodbye to every habitable Russian city within 7,000 miles of ocean.

  • @BloodofPatriots Uh, cold war is ended, remember? Ohio's do not patrol anymore with their missiles aimed at Russia. Besides, Russia still has more nuclear weapons than the US.

  • @AccordGTR Yes, Ohio-class boomers still go to see with their missiles aimed at every nation with nuclear weapons hostile to the interests of the US and NATO. Russia is Iran's best friend, ergo, their interests are hostile to ours. As for nuclear weapons, it's not how many you have, kiddo, but how many you can deploy. Look up that word in the dictionary.

  • Three antiship rockets "mosquito" - and there is no warehouse airplanes;))) And you do not do anything against them;)))

  • none of u represent your country's goverment ideals or politic so why dont you do us all a favor and give us a nice cup of shut the fuck up?

  • The best blue shirt to ever walk the USS Nimitz flight deck was a guy nicknamed VG from fly 1, deployment 2005

  • tight squeze!!

  • Kinda makes you wonder, how many miles of welding are holding all those sheets of steel together.

  • does america really need ten of these bad boys? does american really need to spend as much as it does on the three forces? if i was american id ask them q. please do not insult me i love our american cuzs

  • @patsyd80 well.. think about it... being effective in combat always relied on having the strongest navy... you don't wanna wait until a war breaks out for you to start building a defense plan... its always to stay one step ahead

  • i know what your saying and I have nothing but respect for the usa. But "one step ahead"? americas navy is a hundred feet ahead. Im just saying do they need to spend That much? for example only a handfull of countrys have aircraft carriers and they only have one each except for the uk that has 2 or 3 but their less than half the size of us ones. and america has TEN 100.000 ton nimitz class and I belive some others. Its just over kill. Like the america spends more than the next 10 countrys

  • @patsyd80 look at global history, the Spanish Navy wrought fear and destruction but also provided protection, the British Navy did the same as well. As the world power rotates from country to country the leading country always stood on top with a powerful navy even though excessive. Also, look at the technologies available now to sink naval vessels. It's easier to sink than to replace a naval vessel with a craft a fraction of the cost.

  • @patsyd80 Hey there. These USA Nimitz class carriers help defend our allies, including the UK. We need them, Trust me!

    Here is a hug from across the pond, mate!

  • dude FIX THE SOUND PLEASE!!!! I think I saw this video b4, but I really like the sound of it that goes with this video man, pleas ether tell me whats the name of the song, or fix the sound on this video, PLEASE :) Thax

  • talk about short memories...Iraqi people celebrated theor freedom brought about by the U.S. , now the U.S. are occupiers...just pull out all the troops and let Iraq fight and die amongst themselves...thats what they want apparently ( and they call US terrorists!)

  • @raja8881

    plug yourself with some current events going on...seems like you're quite outdated!

  • Wow, I love how everyone hates america even though we've saved your asses four times over. Bush did nothing, Barrack is the one who can go suck a dick and die.

  • come back the sound PLEASE!!))

  • is there no sound or is the video damaged`?

  • Kool

  • look i did not support the current war, and i dont hate people of middle eastern countries or the muslim faith. you just made me mad with your anti-american comments. sorry for my rude comments. i wish peace between our nations. remember we are all brothers under the same god. i just call him jesus. and you allah. peace

  • we already have like 10,000 nukes so if you want war lets do it. too bad you never even came close to having them....and iran fucked you up in the war in the 80's. your mother has a moustache.

  • yeah an internet troll is going to make the bomb....lol! thanks for the oil. now i can drive my gas guzzler to mcdonalds!

    arabs are the worlds bitch. just like your mother. you know that whore in the burka

  • go stone a teenage girl in the street you fucking savaGES

  • you first camel jockey

  • just admit you are mad cause we like stealing your oil. thanks by the way

  • if they drop it on america they will be destroyed. MAD mutual assured destruction. nobody wants nuke war. you are an asshole for saying that. as to "see you in hell".....you first buddy