Am I the only one who finds strong vs. weak player games more interesting than purely Grandmaster chess? Is this why Morphy's games are so interesting? Thanks for an interesting video.
this is such an interesting game to me, because as black I use a very similar defense, only I get the same pawn structure out of a caro kann, with the white bishop on the outside, looking for exchanges or adding pressure.
I never did like this line with the black pieces. I would from time to time play the Rubenstein old style with an early c5 break against the Tarrasch.
This line seems passive where the my best hope was to wait for white to make a mistake but white had no pressure on him to encourage any mistakes on his part. Too easy for white just to have a total clamp on the center.
I really learn a lot from your commentaries. I've been playing only 2 years, and one of the most challenging things is to try and deduce how chess players *think* while playing...what they see, how they focus, what their eyes are attuned to. I get this from your videos, and I find it incredibly valuable--and something unique I don't see in every annotated game. The pacing is right as well--I find I can follow right along. Thank you.
i think they should make it a rule to play through the game even if the losing person sees the mate ahead...make the opponent earn the victory.. make them march that one pawn all the way down the board.. you never know they might actually miss the mate..or slip up...or something..
Thanks for the video. Loved that it went all the way to checkmate. But I was wondering does black not see the checkmate and that's why he didn't resign or was it something else.
@dumpnchase he definently , 100% saw it i mean this is high level chess but he most certainly let karpov play the mate simply beacuse it was beautifull
Well played by Karpov but I don't think the defense was very strong. Not playing Nxe5 seems crazy. I guess black was just nervous to be playing one of the world's greatest ever players and forgot how to move the pieces properly...
Great Video, Thanks alot. Maybe Next time you could try to find a game, where a chess player comes back, from a large disadvantage against an opponent's team. haha well thanks again Jerry.
Wow Jerry I was just thinking too at 6:50 'I wonder what would result if he would play the bishop in the corner instead' and a few seconds later you covered that too. Great analysis.
I realize the interest in trying something new, especially against a world champion, trying to maybe throw them off a book line or something, but it's almost like he came up with that b6 move right on the spot. I can't imagine he thought it through beforehand or he'd realize how silly it seems to take a total of 4 moves to fianchetto a bishop. Between that and the immediate weaknesses it caused, it's almost as if white gained about 4 or 5 moves on black just on that one mistake.
Loved the video, I agree with a number of the other responses, this was a great explanation for chess beginners, which I am, can't comment on how helpful it is for the chess experts ;-)
Wow...how much prep do you suppose went into the b6 move before the game. Really shows the peril in weakening squares, even ones far from your king. Nice job on this video.
I am a rank beginner and these videos an indispensable tool in helping to develop my skills. Clear explanations, thoughtful analysis, and done so in terms that make sense to a beginner yet don't insult the intelligence of a more seasoned player. Well done!
Great video. For a chess novice like me, your "What if" scenarios are COMPLETELY necessary because I don't tend to see those combinations several moves down. This is really accessible and interesting, even for someone who is not very knowledgable about chess. Thanks
nice video & nice puzzle at the end! Also so funny spelling of "Mihajlo Stojanović" :D i laughed 5 min. Try switching "j" to "y' when you spell... Or don't w/e :). Nice comments.
Great video and commentary. I recently started playing the french defense and use the fort knox, so this was very interesting and informative. Thank you VERY much! I had no idea about that queen trap. I think I must have put myself in that bad position many times but luckily never had an oponent who yet took advantage of it.
@craigybaby10101 no, because the pawn doesn't have to take. And black has time to defend with Q to d8 perhaps? forcing exchange of queens? remember, black is a piece up
I think someone like you could make a show about chess on regular tv and it would actually be a popular show. You show chess the way it is and make every thing crystal clear. You are not one of those commentators who "try" to make chess exciting - you just let the natural excitement of chess be readily visible. If there were more chess comemtators like you, I think chess would have television popularity approaching that of baseball. Keep up the great work!
@boletusedilus in theory yes, but in reality chess is much to complicated for the majority of the public to understand or get into, its unfortunate, but true.
@irishmonkey640 There are more chess-clubs in the world that of any other sport, if you promote it enough people would get into it.
The problem is mainly that chess games are visually too static. That means that there isn't much advertising space compared to other sports. In snooker players are walking around, so they can put adds on all the sides of the room. Top level snooker is also quite complicated and most people don't understand it either.
@boletusedilus Nah Television is a contadiction to chess. With commercials and crap. The internet is a great place for the chess fanatic and the perfect medium.
Thank You !!! God Bless You ChessNetwork for you Good Work +D
badjaeaux 1 month ago
Comment removed
utubBatman 2 months ago
Great game by Karpov. It was the first time I saw a "fianchettoed" rook.
DMK000 4 months ago
Killer fork.
Ztormrageheero 4 months ago
disregard that, it would mate at queen f6, the square you drew threw me off
clintbreed 4 months ago
at 12:58 you said mate on g7, but im fairly sure bishop could just capture
clintbreed 4 months ago
nice game...
136101521 4 months ago
Am I the only one who finds strong vs. weak player games more interesting than purely Grandmaster chess? Is this why Morphy's games are so interesting? Thanks for an interesting video.
SongsofInnocence 4 months ago
Hey Jerry I must say that this is another superb video! So keep it up :)
snuskefar1 5 months ago 3
@snuskefar1 Thanks snuskefar :)
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
ahh karpov...
the slightest positional mistake and he will slaughter you.
great commentary as always!
chrism216 5 months ago
this is such an interesting game to me, because as black I use a very similar defense, only I get the same pawn structure out of a caro kann, with the white bishop on the outside, looking for exchanges or adding pressure.
Madderhatter85 5 months ago
Knight is such an interesting piece
dietsnapple89 5 months ago
At first, I thought Stojanovic was a basketball palyer. :)
Deecee022 5 months ago
great #chess video, with cool ending. more Fort Knox French videos would be great, esp. ones where Black wins.
chesscreator 5 months ago
Assuming from 11:58 knight takes rook at e8, why can't queen take the knight after the bishop moves.
wierdallimmy 5 months ago
do you know who is trolling kingscrusher? just curious
jjphysstud 5 months ago 2
@jjphysstud no
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
I never did like this line with the black pieces. I would from time to time play the Rubenstein old style with an early c5 break against the Tarrasch.
This line seems passive where the my best hope was to wait for white to make a mistake but white had no pressure on him to encourage any mistakes on his part. Too easy for white just to have a total clamp on the center.
TheBigGuppy 5 months ago
Why can't the queen just move to f4 to get out of the trap in the opening?
MoPar7055 5 months ago
@MoPar7055 nevermind, overlooked
MoPar7055 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fianchettoed Rook lol
laicharlie2004 5 months ago
Look at that clown on b7!
jodawe 5 months ago 3
I really learn a lot from your commentaries. I've been playing only 2 years, and one of the most challenging things is to try and deduce how chess players *think* while playing...what they see, how they focus, what their eyes are attuned to. I get this from your videos, and I find it incredibly valuable--and something unique I don't see in every annotated game. The pacing is right as well--I find I can follow right along. Thank you.
JamieMyxter 5 months ago 6
@JamieMyxter Thanks Jamie.
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
i think they should make it a rule to play through the game even if the losing person sees the mate ahead...make the opponent earn the victory.. make them march that one pawn all the way down the board.. you never know they might actually miss the mate..or slip up...or something..
DrewBabyization 5 months ago
Thanks for the video. Loved that it went all the way to checkmate. But I was wondering does black not see the checkmate and that's why he didn't resign or was it something else.
dumpnchase 5 months ago
@dumpnchase Likely just a matter of taste. I'm pretty sure he knew it'd be mate.
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
@dumpnchase he definently , 100% saw it i mean this is high level chess but he most certainly let karpov play the mate simply beacuse it was beautifull
tuoljg 5 months ago
@tuoljg Thanks for the reply. So letting him get to the checkmate was a sign of respect. Thanks
dumpnchase 5 months ago
look at this clown on b7 :D
XRectalAnarchyX 5 months ago 3
karpov would've beaten fisher.
0tt0kruegar 5 months ago
Tremendous commentary. I'm playing a team vote game as Black in this line and this helps very much. Thanks!
drakpete 5 months ago
Well played by Karpov but I don't think the defense was very strong. Not playing Nxe5 seems crazy. I guess black was just nervous to be playing one of the world's greatest ever players and forgot how to move the pieces properly...
JoshWiniberg 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fianchetto rook? hahaha
YtubeUserr 5 months ago
Great Video, Thanks alot. Maybe Next time you could try to find a game, where a chess player comes back, from a large disadvantage against an opponent's team. haha well thanks again Jerry.
irishmonkey640 5 months ago
Wow Jerry I was just thinking too at 6:50 'I wonder what would result if he would play the bishop in the corner instead' and a few seconds later you covered that too. Great analysis.
FMafia206 5 months ago
Very accurate observations! Masterful!
hifaso 5 months ago
Way for Karpov to punish poor development. :-)
chessenthusiast 5 months ago
You're so mean to missplaced pieces!
"Look at that knight on the rim, yo what' up there fattie?".
Ditharu 5 months ago
Look at that clown on b7!
Lhurgolf 5 months ago 4
@Lhurgolf lol
FMafia206 5 months ago
I feel guilty , every time i watch one of jerry's video at night i fall sleep ,
MrIran69 5 months ago
8:01 "and again, look at this clown on uh B7 I mean what is it really doing over here?"
CLASSIC
oddity21 5 months ago
lol fianchetto'ed rook
addycorp2 5 months ago
I realize the interest in trying something new, especially against a world champion, trying to maybe throw them off a book line or something, but it's almost like he came up with that b6 move right on the spot. I can't imagine he thought it through beforehand or he'd realize how silly it seems to take a total of 4 moves to fianchetto a bishop. Between that and the immediate weaknesses it caused, it's almost as if white gained about 4 or 5 moves on black just on that one mistake.
Crooky0 5 months ago
What a beautiful game! !
As always, Your analysis & commentaries are A++
12:31 Qh4 ..
E P I C KA R P O V Trap !
Thanks again!
4panta 5 months ago
Love it
Ueberrushung 5 months ago
Loved the video, I agree with a number of the other responses, this was a great explanation for chess beginners, which I am, can't comment on how helpful it is for the chess experts ;-)
Thanks again
jrforbes24 5 months ago
Wow...how much prep do you suppose went into the b6 move before the game. Really shows the peril in weakening squares, even ones far from your king. Nice job on this video.
saguarojet 5 months ago
Another Nice vid, cheers.
76HabeasCorpus 5 months ago
I am a rank beginner and these videos an indispensable tool in helping to develop my skills. Clear explanations, thoughtful analysis, and done so in terms that make sense to a beginner yet don't insult the intelligence of a more seasoned player. Well done!
pmolloy4 5 months ago
Comment removed
yungf4st 5 months ago
Great video. For a chess novice like me, your "What if" scenarios are COMPLETELY necessary because I don't tend to see those combinations several moves down. This is really accessible and interesting, even for someone who is not very knowledgable about chess. Thanks
Ziddletwix 5 months ago 22
Awesome video
Ancientpeople 5 months ago
another great video! thanks for your informative commentary
liveonthree 5 months ago
nice video & nice puzzle at the end! Also so funny spelling of "Mihajlo Stojanović" :D i laughed 5 min. Try switching "j" to "y' when you spell... Or don't w/e :). Nice comments.
EoNista 5 months ago
Great video and commentary. I recently started playing the french defense and use the fort knox, so this was very interesting and informative. Thank you VERY much! I had no idea about that queen trap. I think I must have put myself in that bad position many times but luckily never had an oponent who yet took advantage of it.
7777Ralph 5 months ago
been awhile since ive seen an Arabian mate
beah8er 5 months ago
Nice combination of both positional and tactical play by karpov.
psihadal 5 months ago
I found the knock-out blow. Hehe. :)))
ourtortsystem 5 months ago
muy gooood
MrEmanuel1223 5 months ago
very nice
returnNull 5 months ago in playlist More videos from ChessNetwork
Would rook to G6 work for the knockout blow? If pawn takes then wouldnt knight to F6 be mate?
craigybaby10101 5 months ago
@craigybaby10101 no, because the pawn doesn't have to take. And black has time to defend with Q to d8 perhaps? forcing exchange of queens? remember, black is a piece up
Tutterkop 5 months ago
jerry for president
clintbreed 5 months ago
thanks for this Jerry.
bluedasher23 5 months ago
I think someone like you could make a show about chess on regular tv and it would actually be a popular show. You show chess the way it is and make every thing crystal clear. You are not one of those commentators who "try" to make chess exciting - you just let the natural excitement of chess be readily visible. If there were more chess comemtators like you, I think chess would have television popularity approaching that of baseball. Keep up the great work!
boletusedilus 5 months ago 48
@boletusedilus in theory yes, but in reality chess is much to complicated for the majority of the public to understand or get into, its unfortunate, but true.
irishmonkey640 5 months ago
@irishmonkey640 There are more chess-clubs in the world that of any other sport, if you promote it enough people would get into it.
The problem is mainly that chess games are visually too static. That means that there isn't much advertising space compared to other sports. In snooker players are walking around, so they can put adds on all the sides of the room. Top level snooker is also quite complicated and most people don't understand it either.
noxure 5 months ago
@boletusedilus Nah Television is a contadiction to chess. With commercials and crap. The internet is a great place for the chess fanatic and the perfect medium.
bierbuik 5 months ago
@boletusedilus Thank you for the kind words.
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
Good stuff, As per usual.... & thanks for including the chess code.
TheEnglishEducator 5 months ago
@TheEnglishEducator Thanks and you're welcome. :)
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
1st?
Higurashi86 5 months ago