This girl is pathetic maybe us homo sexual people dont wanna see men and women holding hands or being happy in my opinion I think it's more nasty that guys wanna eat something that smells like FISH rather then suck on a lollipop. DON"T MESS WITH FAGS BITCH WE ARE READY TO BLAST BACK!!!! btw i really don't care about any other relationship in the world except my own, I think people who comment about these things that are none of their business are nothing but uneducated immature bigot's!!!!!!!
LOL! I like this video! I'm personally only against the word marriage only for the fact for centuries in many different cultures was between a man and woman/women. But I have to say I have a few gay friends and I love them so much! I want them to be with who ever they want to be with. I think couples need to have a lot more things included in civil unions. What they get right now is clearly not enough!
Absolutely amazing, I am designing a pseudo project for PFLAG in college. I would love to include this, I have some gay bashing stuff but I want to lighten it up a bit, you had me rolling...
The same health risks that are involved in all sexual encounters. Except gay people tend to be told even less about std prevention and in fact lies are often spread by straight people with the insidious desire of increasing std rates among homosexuals.
What I was saying was that std prevention should be taught for all types of encounters. If we were to go by the heterosex fits all standard then when lesbians have sex they'll be standing there wondering what they should do with the condom.
I hope they do teach kids about gay sex, in health class/sex ed at least.
I was in there about 5 years ago...and I don't even remember them teaching us about sex or condoms in health class. They taught us a lot about emotional, hygienic, and pregnancy problems. Nothing else though. Of course this was in Texas, which has low standards.
Why do you banter with people who don't understand what you are about. Just let it go and know that some of us think it's funny with a serious message.
I guess I'm still floored that some people think it's real. Maybe hoping they'll take a second look and be like "oh, ok I get it." I will have to let it go. I don't have time to keep up. lol.
I note that this is a SARCASTIC video not intended to be taken seriously, TWICE!!!! Once in the very begining of the video and once in the video's discription box!
Great Video and very funny as well as super clever. Nice job. I am surprised as to the number of people who did not get your point. Amazing. You have our total support! Thanks
I really like this, but I'd be careful. There are a lot of stupid people who will believe this. :-x (look at how the prop 8 lies got to the voters in Cali)
This is so obviously a sarcastic video, ment to show how stupid anti-gay arguments are. Thanks for pointing out my weight though. I hope it made you feel better about yourself.
okay well thall shall not judge and thall shall love that neighbor. it doesn't matter if what they are as long as two people are in love doesn't matter who sex they are they should get married. it won't ruin anyone's life. i don't like your video i wanted to say something on this video. it made me mad and upset. i don't judge i love everyone. i'll support gay marriage and gay pride one hundred percent.
@MrShadow4462 Did you watch this all the way through? I can't believe anyone would think this is a serious video. It's sarcasm. Of course gay marriage wouldn't ruin anyone's life.
Gay rights and racism are political issues. It doesn't have much to do with science. If science says racist are born that way and can't help feeling the way they feel, should society be segregated by race?
I read your "about me" section and I was just wondering what scientific studies or research, if any, do you base your opinion on, and if you wouldn't mind providing the links to them. Thank You.
Gay people don't recruit others to become gay. Why??? We don't need too. There are millions of gays in the closet. We want them to come out, that's all. If you're gay, you're gay. If you're staight, you're straight.
This lady is spreading her ignorance and anyone who agress with her is ignorant too.
Ness,,,Ialso lived next door to a couple that abused their kids , the dad was a Pastor at a local baptsit church and molested his kids,,,so I am voting against straight marriage.
It's cute how you think your petty insults have an effect on me one way or another. I'm going to have alot of fun with them in my next video though. Thanks for the material. My 46 subscribers (which is 45 more than you have) are going to enjoy your ridiculous comments.
I bet you are no stranger to the gay lifestyle....I must have been thinking that I have the freedom of speech and can say whatever the fuck I want. Don't like it? Don't watch.
If your 12 year old daughter ends up having gay sex because someone at school told her "it's healthy and beneficial" then she did it, guess why..... because she's GAY. Either that or you didn't do a good enough job teaching her how to think for herself. It's just easier to blame it on the gays though, right.
You can't judge all gay people on one bad couple that you know. I know of SEVERAL straight couples who are horrible parents. Just watch the news and you'll see them every day. Where can I vote to deny straight people the right to marry, since we are just abusing our voting rights.
Not what I'm saying in the least. Read it again. Sound out the big words.
People who cannot read can marry. People on death row can marry. People who are deemed mentally incompetent can marry. Fathers who have abandoned their children can marry.
But two law-abiding Ivy League graduates who pay taxes, who have been together for 20 years & have devoted their lives to helping the poor are deemed unworthy of marriage if they are both of the same sex. Crazy imho.
If you want to claim your right to marry your dog, it's not me standing in your way.
When someone claims a right, it is up to the gov to find a rational basis and/or a compelling state interest in denying that right. In the case of gay marriage there is none.
With the case of bestiality, I think the gov would not have trouble proving a rational basis for denying such unions.
But again, it's not ME standing in your way. If you want to claim it as a right, make your argument where it counts.
The state can come up with no reasonable, rational basis for denying people the right to marry someone of the same sex. This was admitted in federal court by the defenders of Prop 8 last month.
A rational basis can be argued for bans on bestiality, and no equal protection case can be argued since such bans apply equally; ie they do not apply ONLY to str8s or ONLY to gays..
And I am not seeking your approval or agreement or support, as you were mine for your marriage to your dog
You asked in what way your attempted marriage to your dog differed from gay marriage and I told you.
People who are unable to distinguish bestiality from the lifetime loving commitment of two women are either mentally retarded, facetious, Christian or hold a deep, prejudicial animus towards gays, (usually a combination of all of those). There is no logical connection between them, as I have demonstrated.
The reason same sex partners want equal rights in marriage is so they can have rights to make medical or financial decisions for the other if one isn't able to do for themselves and so they can leave their combined assests to the other if something happens to them. Animals can't make medical and financial decisions and they can't take care of themselves with money. If you leave a dog in a house with a stack of money he can't go out and buy himself food and pay the rent. That's why you can't....
Actually a "hily inteligent and train monkey" would probably make better decisions than you would. I hope you meet a nice train monkey on your next train ride.
You asked in what way an attempted marriage to an animal differed from gay marriage, and we told you several different times in several different ways.
Are you a trained monkey? Your spelling, reasoning, and reading skills seem to suggest so.
You've still got a ways to go before you can be considered HIGHLY trained though, so keep working at it.
@christianpreachr, Agreed it is not a right. You can meet a stranger in a bar and instantly have the privilege to marry that stranger as long as they are of the opposite sex.
At one time being a free person was a privilege that was determmined by skin color.
The const as written did not specifically give women the right to own property or blacks the right to attend desegregated schools.
Yet when people began to petition their gov to recognize those rights, it was not for them to DEFEND, it was for the gov to come up with a rational basis and/or a compelling state interest to continue DENYING those equal rights.
There was none, and they were recognized as rights, as will one day be the case with ssm.
Ever read Goodridge v Department of Public Health? The unanimous decision of the Iowa Supreme Court? The legislated laws of Vermont and New Hampshire?
The right to same sex marriage has been effectively understood, defended and applied within the judicial system.
And rights exist whether they're recognized by the law or not. Black people had rights and were fully deserving of equality imho, before the 3/5's clause and slavery were revoked, even if such was not recognized at the time.
In other words, historically, blacks struggled to have their rights recognized legally.
However, that does not mean that they had no rights before such was RECOGNIZED.
They were LEGALLY considered as less, but in actuality they were equal. They HAD equal rights and always did. They demanded that the government RECOGNIZE such. The gov did not wave a magic wand and make unworthy people suddenly equal. The gov recognized a pre-existing condition, equality, and rights that had always existed.
I'm with you. I am a black man. But I argue the virtue of marriage is a religous ceremony and has no place in government at all. Since marriage started in the church (there's no proof to either side of that argument, but the bible proves me) it should remain there. By making a blanket policy that would require atheists, believers, and same sex couples all to fulfil the same conditions, would alleviate the problem. Only change is believers would have an additional step to take.
But you also have to acknowledge that the word "believers" encompasses gay and lesbian people who are religious and worship at churches that recognize and perform same sex marriages.
But, yes, the system you describe would be fair. If it were ever placed before me as a viable political option, I would have no trouble lending my support. I'm not sure enough people on either side of the issue would lend their support . But I have no problem with it.
Are you joking? In other words, "believers" are only people who believe as you do? That's dreadful. You share that conception of belief with the Taliban. Truly awful. I can't tell if you're joking. I hope so.
Regardless, at least we can agree on an imaginary viable system for recognizing relationship rights. I guess that's something.
I also enjoy a conversation in which--even when there's great disagreement--things are kept civil, so thank you for that. Very much appreciated.
Yes I would also agree witht that. That marriage be a religious union not recognized by the government as a legal union, and then have a separate non-discriminatory, legal union called whatever you want, that would be recognized by the government. That wouls be fair.
Hahahaha.... Oh lord I have to show this to my girlfriend. And we are two beautiful women! So I guess its okay... And I guess we are gonna teach your kids how to have gay sex??
Heavens, you're funny!!
eilinmalenefosse 6 months ago in playlist AlexanderDGraham's Comedy
Your stupid
dissmaster1 1 year ago
This girl is pathetic maybe us homo sexual people dont wanna see men and women holding hands or being happy in my opinion I think it's more nasty that guys wanna eat something that smells like FISH rather then suck on a lollipop. DON"T MESS WITH FAGS BITCH WE ARE READY TO BLAST BACK!!!! btw i really don't care about any other relationship in the world except my own, I think people who comment about these things that are none of their business are nothing but uneducated immature bigot's!!!!!!!
joshualee2479 1 year ago
@joshualee2479 You do realize this video is sarcastic and is actually pro-gay right? Way to think before judging.
saurinfaddoul 1 year ago
LOL! I like this video! I'm personally only against the word marriage only for the fact for centuries in many different cultures was between a man and woman/women. But I have to say I have a few gay friends and I love them so much! I want them to be with who ever they want to be with. I think couples need to have a lot more things included in civil unions. What they get right now is clearly not enough!
lonewolfang 1 year ago
Lol you're cute and funny!
tyeelkins 2 years ago
Absolutely amazing, I am designing a pseudo project for PFLAG in college. I would love to include this, I have some gay bashing stuff but I want to lighten it up a bit, you had me rolling...
Thanks for the laughs! GMHAHN
geonyc12 2 years ago
Yes you may use this. I'd love to see your project when it's finshed!
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
This was awesome thanks for the sarcasm. I loved it. And I so hope that spoon calls you back for a second date.
TMBrd89 2 years ago
You're welcome! He never did call. It turns out that spoons can't use the phone on a count of they don't have any hands. ;-)
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Yeah!! I know the feeling. I had an ex goat lover that didn't call me for the same reason. haha
TMBrd89 2 years ago
5 min. 29 seconds is not enough to laugh bout 700Club & Co.!
C'mon, you have a lot of material.
guidoalfonso 2 years ago
Congradulations, 34 years, that's fantastic. Most couples don't stay together that long, not happily anyway!
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
The mommy and daddy aren't getting along because the mom has a stick up her ass
GrandMasterEnclave 2 years ago
The same health risks that are involved in all sexual encounters. Except gay people tend to be told even less about std prevention and in fact lies are often spread by straight people with the insidious desire of increasing std rates among homosexuals.
What I was saying was that std prevention should be taught for all types of encounters. If we were to go by the heterosex fits all standard then when lesbians have sex they'll be standing there wondering what they should do with the condom.
sandform 2 years ago
I hope they do teach kids about gay sex, in health class/sex ed at least.
I was in there about 5 years ago...and I don't even remember them teaching us about sex or condoms in health class. They taught us a lot about emotional, hygienic, and pregnancy problems. Nothing else though. Of course this was in Texas, which has low standards.
sandform 2 years ago
Why do you banter with people who don't understand what you are about. Just let it go and know that some of us think it's funny with a serious message.
CTeric3742 2 years ago
I guess I'm still floored that some people think it's real. Maybe hoping they'll take a second look and be like "oh, ok I get it." I will have to let it go. I don't have time to keep up. lol.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Lol. Wow. Gay animals? Yeah thats going to fly. I encourage you to do some research, they just don't exist.
TheNinjarocker4 2 years ago
They sure do. I posted the link from an article in National Geographic News in the video's discription box.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
I mean seriously. You are bigot bitch. Get some help.
kanebear 2 years ago
I note that this is a SARCASTIC video not intended to be taken seriously, TWICE!!!! Once in the very begining of the video and once in the video's discription box!
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Great Video and very funny as well as super clever. Nice job. I am surprised as to the number of people who did not get your point. Amazing. You have our total support! Thanks
mexicoireland 2 years ago
I really like this, but I'd be careful. There are a lot of stupid people who will believe this. :-x (look at how the prop 8 lies got to the voters in Cali)
bb6f44 2 years ago
FUCK YOU. You're fat, what if fat people didn't have rights. You are so stupid.
SoWeirdBoy 2 years ago
This is so obviously a sarcastic video, ment to show how stupid anti-gay arguments are. Thanks for pointing out my weight though. I hope it made you feel better about yourself.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
it did... it really did...
SoWeirdBoy 2 years ago
Congradulations then. No better way to achive gay rights than attacking those on your side.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Comment removed
mexicoireland 2 years ago
one word: COCKS! :)
Good video, you rock!
EricSchwin22 2 years ago
okay well thall shall not judge and thall shall love that neighbor. it doesn't matter if what they are as long as two people are in love doesn't matter who sex they are they should get married. it won't ruin anyone's life. i don't like your video i wanted to say something on this video. it made me mad and upset. i don't judge i love everyone. i'll support gay marriage and gay pride one hundred percent.
MrShadow4462 2 years ago 2
@MrShadow4462 totaly agree with you!!
HalomansyTV 2 years ago
@HalomansyTV This is a sarcastic video.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
@MrShadow4462 Did you watch this all the way through? I can't believe anyone would think this is a serious video. It's sarcasm. Of course gay marriage wouldn't ruin anyone's life.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Hahaha, I couldn't stop laughing!! classic xD
obscure1992 2 years ago
Gay rights and racism are political issues. It doesn't have much to do with science. If science says racist are born that way and can't help feeling the way they feel, should society be segregated by race?
gaysandracists 2 years ago
Then how do you explain interracial gay couples?
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
This woman is ignorant. Gays are like racists. You might as well start defending racists and racists rights.
gaysandracists 2 years ago
I read your "about me" section and I was just wondering what scientific studies or research, if any, do you base your opinion on, and if you wouldn't mind providing the links to them. Thank You.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Pure ignorance!
Gay people don't recruit others to become gay. Why??? We don't need too. There are millions of gays in the closet. We want them to come out, that's all. If you're gay, you're gay. If you're staight, you're straight.
This lady is spreading her ignorance and anyone who agress with her is ignorant too.
tom60657 2 years ago
@tom60657 if you watch the video all the way through you should realize that it's sarcastic.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
@tom60657 you miss the whole point,she was showing how ignorance it is to slam gay
ashatbulaparanormal 2 years ago
This is sarcasm don't you get it? she's PRO..not CON
hotrodbod1 2 years ago
"how to do gay sex"??? LMAO, what a waste YOU ARE!
jdustin21 2 years ago
Ness should we have voted on womens right to vote and interacial marriage etc? We can not vote on people rights, that is called tyrenny.
Clemburke1111 2 years ago
Ness,,,Ialso lived next door to a couple that abused their kids , the dad was a Pastor at a local baptsit church and molested his kids,,,so I am voting against straight marriage.
Clemburke1111 2 years ago
It's cute how you think your petty insults have an effect on me one way or another. I'm going to have alot of fun with them in my next video though. Thanks for the material. My 46 subscribers (which is 45 more than you have) are going to enjoy your ridiculous comments.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
I bet you are no stranger to the gay lifestyle....I must have been thinking that I have the freedom of speech and can say whatever the fuck I want. Don't like it? Don't watch.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
What was I thinking,"forcing" people to click on my videos and watch them and trying to "force" my psycho equal rights agenda on other people.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
If your 12 year old daughter ends up having gay sex because someone at school told her "it's healthy and beneficial" then she did it, guess why..... because she's GAY. Either that or you didn't do a good enough job teaching her how to think for herself. It's just easier to blame it on the gays though, right.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
@jstherapeutic AMEN TO THAT!
jdustin21 2 years ago
You can't judge all gay people on one bad couple that you know. I know of SEVERAL straight couples who are horrible parents. Just watch the news and you'll see them every day. Where can I vote to deny straight people the right to marry, since we are just abusing our voting rights.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
haha i think i luv u ^_^
zackisverybored 2 years ago
can i marry animals i mean im sure my dog loves me so y not
kahah2 2 years ago
Because your dog isn't a consenting adult who can sign a marriage contract? Just a thought.
filmstocker 2 years ago
@filmstocker
what your saying is that illiterate people cant be married
and technicly 6 months is 18 for a dog so..
and im sure it loves me
kahah2 2 years ago
Not what I'm saying in the least. Read it again. Sound out the big words.
People who cannot read can marry. People on death row can marry. People who are deemed mentally incompetent can marry. Fathers who have abandoned their children can marry.
But two law-abiding Ivy League graduates who pay taxes, who have been together for 20 years & have devoted their lives to helping the poor are deemed unworthy of marriage if they are both of the same sex. Crazy imho.
filmstocker 2 years ago
@filmstocker
im never said anything agenst gays i just want to know why i cant marry animals if thats what i love
and there is know need to make it out that i cant think or anything considering i made a valid argument for every argument u had angest zoophilla
so what u only toleriate to a cirtain extent im not saying i want to marry my dog but why cant i if i did
i myself would never attack a gay person for being gay if they just want sexual tolierance well you cant just stop it at one point
kahah2 2 years ago
If you want to claim your right to marry your dog, it's not me standing in your way.
When someone claims a right, it is up to the gov to find a rational basis and/or a compelling state interest in denying that right. In the case of gay marriage there is none.
With the case of bestiality, I think the gov would not have trouble proving a rational basis for denying such unions.
But again, it's not ME standing in your way. If you want to claim it as a right, make your argument where it counts.
filmstocker 2 years ago
@filmstocker
u could say the same for gay marriage
kahah2 2 years ago
Er, no. Fail.
The state can come up with no reasonable, rational basis for denying people the right to marry someone of the same sex. This was admitted in federal court by the defenders of Prop 8 last month.
A rational basis can be argued for bans on bestiality, and no equal protection case can be argued since such bans apply equally; ie they do not apply ONLY to str8s or ONLY to gays..
And I am not seeking your approval or agreement or support, as you were mine for your marriage to your dog
filmstocker 2 years ago
You asked in what way your attempted marriage to your dog differed from gay marriage and I told you.
People who are unable to distinguish bestiality from the lifetime loving commitment of two women are either mentally retarded, facetious, Christian or hold a deep, prejudicial animus towards gays, (usually a combination of all of those). There is no logical connection between them, as I have demonstrated.
Next!!
filmstocker 2 years ago
The reason same sex partners want equal rights in marriage is so they can have rights to make medical or financial decisions for the other if one isn't able to do for themselves and so they can leave their combined assests to the other if something happens to them. Animals can't make medical and financial decisions and they can't take care of themselves with money. If you leave a dog in a house with a stack of money he can't go out and buy himself food and pay the rent. That's why you can't....
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
marry an animal.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
@jstherapeutic
what about a hily inteligent and train monkey?
kahah2 2 years ago
Actually a "hily inteligent and train monkey" would probably make better decisions than you would. I hope you meet a nice train monkey on your next train ride.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
You asked in what way an attempted marriage to an animal differed from gay marriage, and we told you several different times in several different ways.
Are you a trained monkey? Your spelling, reasoning, and reading skills seem to suggest so.
You've still got a ways to go before you can be considered HIGHLY trained though, so keep working at it.
filmstocker 2 years ago
@filmstocker
k thx 4 da advice ill keep working on it
kahah2 2 years ago
Marriage is not a right.
christianpreachr 2 years ago
@christianpreachr, Agreed it is not a right. You can meet a stranger in a bar and instantly have the privilege to marry that stranger as long as they are of the opposite sex.
At one time being a free person was a privilege that was determmined by skin color.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
"Marriage is one of the basic civil rights of man."
--The Supreme Court of The United States
filmstocker 2 years ago
@filmstocker A person has only those rights that they can defend. No where in the constitution is marriage "given" to anyone.
christianpreachr 2 years ago
Not true. Where did you get that notion?
The const as written did not specifically give women the right to own property or blacks the right to attend desegregated schools.
Yet when people began to petition their gov to recognize those rights, it was not for them to DEFEND, it was for the gov to come up with a rational basis and/or a compelling state interest to continue DENYING those equal rights.
There was none, and they were recognized as rights, as will one day be the case with ssm.
filmstocker 2 years ago
We only have "rights" if we're able to effectively understand and apply the law for our defense within the judicial system.
christianpreachr 2 years ago
Ever read Goodridge v Department of Public Health? The unanimous decision of the Iowa Supreme Court? The legislated laws of Vermont and New Hampshire?
The right to same sex marriage has been effectively understood, defended and applied within the judicial system.
And rights exist whether they're recognized by the law or not. Black people had rights and were fully deserving of equality imho, before the 3/5's clause and slavery were revoked, even if such was not recognized at the time.
filmstocker 2 years ago
In other words, historically, blacks struggled to have their rights recognized legally.
However, that does not mean that they had no rights before such was RECOGNIZED.
They were LEGALLY considered as less, but in actuality they were equal. They HAD equal rights and always did. They demanded that the government RECOGNIZE such. The gov did not wave a magic wand and make unworthy people suddenly equal. The gov recognized a pre-existing condition, equality, and rights that had always existed.
filmstocker 2 years ago
I'm with you. I am a black man. But I argue the virtue of marriage is a religous ceremony and has no place in government at all. Since marriage started in the church (there's no proof to either side of that argument, but the bible proves me) it should remain there. By making a blanket policy that would require atheists, believers, and same sex couples all to fulfil the same conditions, would alleviate the problem. Only change is believers would have an additional step to take.
christianpreachr 2 years ago
I agree that such a system would be fair.
But you also have to acknowledge that the word "believers" encompasses gay and lesbian people who are religious and worship at churches that recognize and perform same sex marriages.
But, yes, the system you describe would be fair. If it were ever placed before me as a viable political option, I would have no trouble lending my support. I'm not sure enough people on either side of the issue would lend their support . But I have no problem with it.
:)
filmstocker 2 years ago
This was a great conversation. I thank you.
When I say believers, I mean right winged, conservatice, republican Christians. People who thinks on those lines.
christianpreachr 2 years ago
Are you joking? In other words, "believers" are only people who believe as you do? That's dreadful. You share that conception of belief with the Taliban. Truly awful. I can't tell if you're joking. I hope so.
Regardless, at least we can agree on an imaginary viable system for recognizing relationship rights. I guess that's something.
I also enjoy a conversation in which--even when there's great disagreement--things are kept civil, so thank you for that. Very much appreciated.
filmstocker 2 years ago
I think by "believers" he means those who believe in discrimination, in other words, right-winged, republican, conservative Christians.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Because right-winged, conservative, republican (that's not redundant at all) Christians are the only believers in the world. There are no others.
(In case you couldn't tell-you conservatives do tend to be a bit thick-this was an entirely sarcastic comment.)
kellykellys 2 years ago
Yes I would also agree witht that. That marriage be a religious union not recognized by the government as a legal union, and then have a separate non-discriminatory, legal union called whatever you want, that would be recognized by the government. That wouls be fair.
jstherapeutic 2 years ago
Hahahaha.... Oh lord I have to show this to my girlfriend. And we are two beautiful women! So I guess its okay... And I guess we are gonna teach your kids how to have gay sex??
sparklininthedark 2 years ago
What I can't my fork?
Boudiga 2 years ago
I hope it dose ruin your life.
Buttaredtoast 2 years ago
I was going to leave a bad comment, until I saw that it was a sarcastic video!
jefffhhhardy00 2 years ago 2
That was great, Penny! :) Thanks.
Justmakingthis 2 years ago
What's next? Straight Republican men marrying their vacuum cleaners.
Kailoa36 2 years ago
"Bob, that is the most intelligent arguement I've ever heard" hahahaha
razorafterdeath 2 years ago
"What's next... Interracial marriage"???
"What's next... humans marrying dogs"??
No, people marrying KITCHEN UTENSILS!!!
LOL!!!!! OMG, this was GREAT!
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!
Boy, their arguments against Gay Marriage is even MORE lame after seeing this. They need to come up with better arguments, LOL!!
Love it!
texxxasfynest 2 years ago
LOL...
What does it say when your 'sarcastic take' seems LESS outrageous, shrill, extreme and hypocritical than the real deal? Oy.
And I LOVE your opening credits. I almost peed myself with laughter. You're awesome. Five stars for making out with a spoon. Again, again!!
filmstocker 2 years ago 3