Added: 3 years ago
From: TheAlexJonesChannel
Views: 6,353
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (67)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • who's calling the shots? Bush? nope, he needs help tying his own shoelace. the banks? yep, large companies? yep.

  • I really like Margaret Cho, but she is naive about Obama. He is bad news. Bought & paid for just like the rest of the Republocrats.

    Vote Libertarian. Stop the New World Order.

  • Libertarian? Why the fuck would I vote for Barr? Vote independent. Vote Kucinich, Paul, Nader, Gravel. Those were the good choices. Barr's a shithead.

  • Aye, Bob (CIA) Barr is a shithead alright. I supported Barr for about 2 minutes like 5 months ago, until I smelled the coffee. Besides, what I probably meant was vote for Libertarian "ideals" (which Barr really doesn't embody), as opposed to liberal, neocon, globalist ideals. Ron Paul was my number one choice, but since he basically ended his campaign, I reluctantly voted for Chuck Baldwin. Oh well, it's not like voting matters at the end of the day.

  • probably b ut hopefully not

  • Damn, she needs to get her mind right on Obama. or Obomba

  • atleast she is risking her career speaking out so fair play. but she should care more about iraqi people being killed.

  • I agree with what she's saying about the soldiers who are being sent over there, but I HATE HATE HATE that she clearly, CLEARLY could care less about the millions of Iraqis who've died and the hundreds and thousands of families who've been torn asunder by our brutality.

    The rape of a country doesn't concern her as much as the compromise of our personal freedoms here. Another limp-wristed liberal.

  • uhm i dont think you heard the whole interveiw she clearly said that some where - im not listening to it again

  • I think Obama is better than any of the other candidates, but he's just another big money democrat and not a radical by any means. I really hope that he really brings some palpable change, but I have serious doubts.

  • Why didnt Alex inform margaret that they are ALL owned by the illuminati scum inc obama.

  • Paul voted against the war, why did Alex say that? So did Dennis I think.

  • Alex Jones is a Ron Paul supporter, so I took it to mean he was referring to the three remaining "big name" candidates. He also said that Obama voted against the war, which is incorrect. He opposed it, but he wasn't in the Senate in 2003.

    Also, don't forget Margaret Cho is a Democrat & Obama supporter - I think Jones was being gentlemanly in allowing that Obama is at least better on the issue than Clinton & McBomb.

  • He is supported by the same folks as Killary and McSame..CFR. But I would rather have to deal with him for some reason than the other 2.

  • Alex was really holding back here, Obama is the same as McCain and Clinton. They are all in the cfr and will do the same thing. I guess he is holding back when it comes to famous guests he wants to come on his show. You know he wants to go further but he is holding back. Not everyone is ready for truth.

  • support cannabis prohibition and not supprting ron paul? you can tell that alex wants is holding back alllll the trash he has on obama hah why do these people think 'obama' is going to help this country?

  • Oh dear, she questions 9-11 but is still supporting Obama - haven't quite got it yet, have you dear?

    They're all owned....that's part of the game, to make you think that there's a choice, and that there's some possibiity of 'change' coming from the system as it stands today....doh!

  • You may be right about Dodd, but the problem with that is he was not propped up by them to be president. Those who are supposed to win (one of the three previously mentioned) know their place and they agree to it before being propped up to become president, these pretenders know their place ahead of time and with the understanding if they step out of line it will be the last thing they do. Obama if in office will do as he already pledged to do, as he knows and agreed to it.

  • This is not to argue that Microsoft, Amnesty International, or Goldman Sachs be given seats in the United Nations General Assembly, but it does mean including representatives of such organisations in regional and global deliberations when they have the capacity to affect whether and how regional and global challenges are met.

    Moreover, states must be prepared to surrender some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function."

  • The sovereign state is influenced by them (for better and for worse) as much as it is able to influence them. The near monopoly of power once enjoyed by sovereign entities is being eroded.

    As a result, new mechanisms are needed for regional and global governance that include actors other than states.

  • now co-exist with a larger number of powerful non-sovereign and at least partly (and often largely) independent actors, ranging from corporations to non-government organisations (NGOs), from terrorist groups to drug cartels, from regional and global institutions to banks and private equity funds.

  • "Yes, Obama is CFR, but I don't think that necessarily means he's out to ruin US sovereignty." Finally someone who doesn't agree with me that is willing to admit Obama is a CFR member. At least you are honest. Take this into consideration, part of a publication put out by Haass on behalf of the CFR:

    "Author:

    Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations

    February 17, 2006

    Project Syndicate

    The world's 190-plus states

  • It is a very dangerous thing to know who the true enemy is, and then accidently support one of their stooges like Clinton/McCain/Obama. People are blinded when by loyalty sometimes, whether it be by gender/race/religion/party lines.

  • If McCain won at least people would get ready for a shit storm, same thing with clinton, but if Obama won he would be able to not only lie his way out of anything, but he would be able to be behind you, and you would not even know until post-penetration.

    obama . senate . gov / img / 051101 _ cfr _ non _ proliferation . jpg

    "retroactive' ...boy ! do i agree with everything you wrote ....took the words outta my mouth" Thanks bebop, just trying to warn people.

  • well i think it's great that you do it so eloquently....

  • I'm not making this sh*t up, and I wouldn't be wasting my time on a guess. I know that all three for a fact are members.

    Obama is not "half asleep". Obama is a great deceiver and he has a lot of people fooled about being genuine. If he won he would sell you out so quick you will not even see it coming, and perhaps that is even more dangerous.

  • He is there and on the media non stop (good/bad but nonstop coverage) because that is what the CFR founder wants. The media wouldn't of framed these three up to be the major "top tier/winnable" candidates if they weren't all in their club. I seen all of their names as members before the presidential bid even started, they all have close relations and ties to high up members, and they all pledged/promised loyalty to the group.

  • "Well, at least the only problem with Obama is that HE'S half-asleep. McCain and the Clintons are DELIBERATELY working on behalf of our

    plantation lords. When Obama finally does wake up completely, our owners are either going to give him the JFK" I don't know why people keep comparing him to JFK or say he will die if he wins, He was placed there and even funded by the CFR in some aspects.

  • Alex seems like he's compromising... slightly. Sometimes he has to lie to kick it.

  • yeah that's exactly how it seems to me too....

  • obama is cheney's cousin people !!! wake -up '

    he's CFR ...pro- NAU...pr0-israel .....

    AND mis-info' ....

    it's ron paul who voted against the war !!!!!

    and kucinich & gravel ..

    how dare they say only obama voted against the war .....

    margaret , the election ain't a comedy skit '!

    and alex ' ? why didn't you call her out ?

    bad guest , man ...and you too ...bad show ....

  • Obama is a very, very, very distant cousin of Cheney, and it's a wild assumption to claim that because of the genetic link voting for Obama is no different from voting for Cheney. Yes, Obama is CFR, but I don't think that necessarily means he's out to ruin US sovereignty. Senator Dodd, who is also CFR, is an example of someone who stood up to Bush's telecom immunity bill, just to give you an example of CFR members who do the best they can to represent the people's interest.

  • is it in the 'people's ' best interest to have a 'north american union , new currency & no more constitution ?

    obama supports all these moves and so does EVERY member of the CFR....

    i know it's a drag , but we must at least make informed decisions ....

    yes, it does make a difference that they are all related to each other ....certainly it does ...

    we are not a monarchy after all ...or are we?

  • No, it's not in the peoples' best interest to have a North American Union, but not all CFR members are for it. Some politicians are in the CFR because they feel they need to "play the game" to do good. They have no earthly clue, some of them, of the nefariousness of the organization. And your implication that I don't make informed decisions pisses me off to no end, because I am well versed on this stuff. 9/11: inside job, by the way.

  • but not well versed enough ...

    please do further research on the CFR ....

    who formed it ....

    why it was formed ...

    people who 'claim' to be well versed often are not ....

    the more research one does the more one realizes just how little they know ....

    you sound like you are on the right track ! ....

    good luck friend ....

  • I know who formed the CFR, bebop. I know all about the anti-American reasons why it was formed, believe me. I'll bet if our knowledge on it was tested, I'd be right at your level. I listen to Alex Jones, I watch videos, etc. I know CFR wants a NAU and world government. I just don't think every single CFR member is aware of what's going on. Again, Christopher Dodd: has been a stern protector of Constitution since Bush took office. Angelina Jolie: She's CFR, and do you think she's pro NAU?

  • absolutely ....

    and from the time you have angelina as a role model , you know you are in big trouble ...

    i understand you are a very young person & so i will wish you luck on your quest for truth .. passion is good ....watch what people REALLY do & don't listen to what they say ...

    good deeds are always done anonymously , not in the public eye ...

    sometimes a little knowledge is worse than none ....take care ...

  • No, good deeds are not always done anonymously. What the hell are you talking about? And I didn't say Jolie is role model, but that to assume that she's anti-US sovereignty because she's CFR is wild speculation. In your quest for truth, you see the world in black and white--all CFR members are anti-American evil bastards who hate the constitution. George Bush and Bill Clinton: evil cocksuckers. Obama and Dodd: good guys despite their membership in the nefarious CFR.

  • great interview!

  • Well, at least the only problem with Obama is that HE'S half-asleep. McCain and the Clintons are DELIBERATELY working on behalf of our plantation lords. When Obama finally does wake up completely, our owners are either going to give him the JFK treatment and frame some skinheads for it - OR the CIA will use their usual brainwashing techniques on him. Check out the footage of Bill Clinton in his brainwashed state in the clip "CIA Brainwashing Techniques" (also "Media Spin" by Brian Springer).

  • great points-daysleepisgoodforyou!

  • Margaret's for Obama? She's still half asleep!

  • fight the power people

  • One last thing, I think that those who are really in control here are so confident and overly cocky that let's say Obama gets the nomination they will give the VP spot to Clinton just to further laugh at how dumbed down they made the population. People are saying Clinton cant beat McCain and Obama can. What would you do then if Obama got the nomination and announced Clinton as the running mate? It would be nothing more than a inside joke to those who are in control, at your expense of course.

  • They own all sides of the given debate, in any given argument they have arguments for one thing and against it as well at the same time so no matter what they control the outcome of that argument. Both sides of the argument they own and whatever the conclusion is and was the main goal to begin with.

  • Here's an example if Obama wins I guarantee the Iraq war will go on for his entire term, there will be even more wars mentioned in the future, and some of the CFR's other agendas such as a global tax, or a global carbon tax. However since Obama is made out to be anti-war his extended occupation of Iraq would be seen as a need because of some unforeseen issue or event. The same thing goes for Clinton.

  • If McCain wins, he wont use any excuse or even need one as he already promised his supporters more wars and an extended occupation of Iraq. However since they own both sides of the argument here, the conclusion of this argument is theirs to own and the conclusion no matter what side wins out will be their original goal which was staying in Iraq, going into Iran (to topple existing leaders to establish owned assets as the new leaders),

  • and to finally set the precedent of a global tax to a supranational governing body, whether their excuse is their global warming hoax, or some other lame excuse to tax the world at once.

  • retroactive' ...boy ! do i agree with everything you wrote ....took the words outta my mouth ...

  • Yeah I'm defiantly disappointed in Jones for saying that stuff about obama. He didn't even vote period on behalf of the war.

  • On the first clip he accused the Major Media of character assassinating Obama, which is not true at all. Look at the very beginning of the presidential bids and see who the major media picked as their "top tier" candidates. Obama had their favorable coverage (depending on which mouthpiece station), McCain did, Giuliani did, Clinton did, Huckabee did.

  • They will throw opposing views on different stations but these names were the ones mentioned more than any other and regarding an election any coverage or name recognition is positive no matter the message. They worked overtime to keep these names in the collective consciousness of this nation's people. They at times even made from of McCain, yet he is their so called "maverick". The only thing they are doing is working to create more of a divide than already exists with Americans.

  • They use every old play in the book except this time they used them all at once with their members. They used race,religion,gender,falsehood­s by using a diverse range of their very own CFR members, so no matter what the outcome they still win. If you own all the horses in a race, then no matter what you win, that is what is going on here. I remember news stations (not all but two major media stations) making Obama out to be the next JFK,

  • Im sorry to have to tell you this he is a Council On Foreign Relations member along with Clinton(1&2), McCain. The whole thing is a show whether they say something bad about one of their hand chosen candidates or something good it does not matter as they make sure those are the only names mentioned.

  • Thank you Margaret Cho!

  • This was a very good interview. She came across well.

  • Is my imagination or does Margret look she lost weight, and looks pretty hot in the "Still Shot" of hers (black background)?

  • margaret looks great but maaaaaaaaaaan... what the hell is she talkin' about ... ????

  • You ever notice how AJ never gets to the phone calls! Well yesterday he did do a lot.

  • he wants to but he has lots to say not enough time to get it all out

  • oh, so now Barack Obama is against the war? Since when Mr. Jones and Ms. Cho? Since when voting for funding the war is being against the war? And one more thing Mr. Jones: Obama is a CFR member/ AIPAC lover/ Iran wannabe invader-in-chief!

  • Well I think he was being polite but, you are right I mean if Brezinzki is your foreign policy advisor you are in no way anti-war. At best he is a puppet like Reagan but, at least Reagan was for the gold standard and against the income tax at least...I think he should have kept being polite but, slowly brought up more things on Obama while showing how Ron Paul and Kucinich where different.

  • whatever! niunka1, la la la la la la la la la la

  • well said niunka !

    that was a blatant lie ! obama is pro-war ...

    also the ones who really voted against it were'nt even mentioned ...

    kucinich , gravel & paul ( both running) ..

    his interview really was a big turn-off ....

    i lost quite a bit of respect for AJ ....

    and i'm still wonderin' after so many years why he hasn't addressed the jesuit question ...

    i don't go for it at all...

  • wow! another asian to question 9/11! lol i thought i was the only one

  • Actually the Japanese Government is getting to it as well, so you're definitely not alone :-)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more