evidence is piling up?? in your fantasy head. your a physics professor. wtf...that sparking flame could be a sparkler someone head in their desk for all you know. that doesnt mean its so. you form steel with prolonged burning. the place had slow burning diesel. that place was burning for weeks.
@greywolf424 I'm still waiting for you to give factual evidence to dispute everything in detail to proove once & for all that what happened was strictly due to the planes.
Why was there molten steel under the 3 buildings?
How thick was that A-36 steel?
What R the properties of A-36 steel?
Was there a fire at every support column on #7 that caused an even collapse?
What other building constructed with A-36 steel fell due to fire?
How many skyscrapers have fallen due to plane strikes?
@FifePerformance I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE SHIT, YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING CLAIMS IT IS NOT POSSIBLE EVEN THOUGH THOUSANDS OF EXPERTS SAY THAT IT IS, AND YOU ARE THE ONE WHO CAN'T PRODUCE A SHRED OF PROOF
@greywolf424 Warehouses don't see the load factor or the structural complexity as skyscrapers... you're a dumbass and I like that about you... you make me laugh bro... lol
@greywolf424 we are talking about skyscrapers and the A-36 steel used... and with that we're talking about the structural design/strength/thicknesses of the steel. How many skyscrapers have fallen due to fires? How long did they burn? etc etc... Come on man... do research. "THE TRUTH WILL SET YOUR FREE!" hahaha
@greywolf424 Sure do, A-36 structurual steel. The type of steel, the thickness of steel, the shape/design of the steel will dictate how it reacts to heat. ARE YOU GOING TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS CORKY?
@FifePerformance YOU ASKED "HOW MANY BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED WITH A-36 STEEL HAVE COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE", SINCE ALMOST EVERY WAREHOUSE IN THE WESTERN WORLD ARE BUILT WITH A-36 STEEL IT IS SAFE TO SAY THOUSANDS......
@greywolf424 I want facts man... how many skyscrapers have fallen due to fires... how long did they burn for? At what temps did they burn at? and how is that they didn't collapse in a heep? Why wasn't there molten metal in the center of the rubbish? lol YOU'RE LOOSING
@greywolf424 I'm still laughing how you compared warehouse structures to skyscraper structures... hahahaha I have to crash inorder to get some sleep for uncle sam... Keep it real CORKY. hahaha
@greywolf424 Warehouse Structures vs Skyscraper Structures are like comparing a straw house to a WWII German re-inforced rebar/concrete bunker... Corky, you lost! That right there says it all man... Not only did you lose the race but you're still retarded... No worries Corky, I still got love for you. You make me laugh!!!
@FifePerformance DON'T CHANGE THE FACT THAT AFTER MORE THAN NINE YEARS ASSHOLES LIKE YOU STILL CAN'T PRODUCE A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURTROOM ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET.
@OFCOND well my and greypubes comments have been going for over 1 month, on the FREE MAN movement etc. and then 9/11. the man follows me like a crack whore, wanting her next fix. either way he is admmitingly a zionist. he had been invited to a live radio show to put his case forward, but ran away. and u make a judgement on the last 2% of something, is not going to be seen as very clever either. so perhaps a revaluation on your behalf, or may be not. either way , i dont care.
@FifePerformance YOU ARE THE ONE LOSING ASSHOLE, I HAVE BEEN DESTROYING SOCK PUPPET SHILLS LIKE YOU FOR YEARS..... BOTTOM LINE YOU DON'T HAVE A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURTROOM ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET AFTER MORE THAN NINE YEARS
@bigbrother1994 he doesn't understand the differences between warehouse structures and skyscraper structures. He doesn't understand that fact these skyscrapers and their structural supports/design were made to take a plane impact, that they were designed to withstand fires, he doesn't understand that a vast majority of the fuel was burned on impact, he doesn't understand that molten steel under the buildings couldn't have been produced by the fuel of the planes, Or by alpha fires in #7... lol
@greywolf424 Check it out man, I have to wake up a 0330 to go to work for uncle sam, I don't get off work tomorrow until 1830 tomorrow... by the time I get home it'll be roughly 1945, that should give you plenty of time to google, research and have a semi-decent and half-assed response to make a comical arguement. Good luck buddy, millions are depending on your intuitive response.
@greywolf424 I'll show you the proof as soon as you start answering the questions honestly with detailed & factual answers. You keep dodging these answers or you toss out blanket statements and hide behind a few "credited sources" which bow to the dollar & pressure of the Gov't. Why is it that most of Europe says inside job, why is it that majority of the world says we did it? I've been overseas MANY times my friend. I was there when they came down & I just came back & it seems truth still wins.
@greywolf424 You can live behind your facade about Innocent America, & how it wouldn't do such a thing as to bring down the towers & sacrifice the lives of innocent American but, the fact of the matter is, Our country was founded on corruption, lies & deceit "for the good of man". I love what this country stood for & I honestly dislike how it is, yet, I'm still in the Military trying to hold on to what America used to be. And the more I learn and look into our History the more I get disgusted.
@greywolf424 hahaha yeah so an alpha fire weakend A-36 steel to the point of complete structural failure... lol. that in itself tells me that you don't know shit... hahahaha... ahhh man, that was a good laugh... thanks man!
Amazing, 3 years after this video was posted on YouTube and still no one is in jail, no one had to give back insurance money, nothing. Treason is punishable by death and the people involved should remember that.
the so called 9/11 commissions report shouldn't be a basis for information on these attacks, this isn't something morons are skeptical of, we're talking about architects, engineers, some smart people who know more about physics than most people on this page trying to comment and say everyone who is skeptical is a douchebag, sorry, but that's not an argument, BE SKEPTICAL, and don't swallow the bullshit we're fed on a regular basis. nothing wrong with that....
Excuse me, this guy is not an Engineer, he was fired from his Job and the Entire Engineering Department at BYU did look at his ideas, and they said he is completley wrong....The group Architects is bogus,,,they have like 2 people with any experience...they do not really have 1000 members. thats why you only ever see this guy and griffin and gage.they are the only ones really...and his evidence is contaminated, and does NOT SHOW THERMITE. He Knows the results are properly interpreted as Negative
@JPPolachek I'm a machinist and a certified metallurgist. There is no way that the jet fuel carried by the planes could have reached the necessary temperatures needed to melt or structurally weaken the vast majority of the A-36 steel used in the construction of the towers. WTC 7 shows the same thermal temps as WTC 1 and WTC 2 but, WTC 7 was never hit by a plane. How do 3 buildings collapse in the same manner, two by claim of fuel from planes and the other by localized internal "alpha" fires???
@greywolf424 It's obvious that you haven't got the slightest clue. Do some research, Find the composition of A-36 steel, understand the percentages of the various properties in the steel, what/why they're there etc, find the temp at which the A-36 steel turns into a "liquid". Once you find that look at the "Mush" zone. (partially solid/partially liquid). now tell me what you learned. Look at some of the video of the metal pouring out of the towers, research what it takes for it to do that.
@greywolf424 wow, this explains a lot... So I take it that you didn't take the information/suggestion and research on your own behalf to find the truth? I ask you, who's the puppet?
@FifePerformance NOT ONE OTHER THAN LYING ASSHOLES LIKE YOU COWERING BEHIND SOCK PUPPET SHILL ACCOUNTS EVER CLAIMED IT MELTED...... AND YOU HAVE NO SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIABLE PROOF TO SUPPORT THE CLAIM AFTER NINE YEARS.
@whyohwhyfools Hey man don't let greywolf424 get your goat. He obviously thinks that Corporate America wouldn't do such a thing. I wonder why the owner of the WTC's updated his Insurance policy shortly before the towers fell. It was all staged, we know it, some just don't want to believe it. GreyWolf424 doesn't know any better. GreyWolf = Canis lupus. They're known for partially consuming their food & in this case he's known for partially devouring the facts of reality which dictate inside job.
@FifePerformance FACT IS AFTER OVER NINE YEARS YOU STILL DON'T HAVE ONE SINGLE PIECE OF LEGALLY ACTIONABLE OR SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURT ROOM ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET TO SUPPORT YOUR MOLTEN STEEL HORSE SHIT (MOLTEN METAL, WHICH DOES NOT MEAN OR PROVE STEEL IS WHAT WAS REPORTED LIAR) .......
@FifePerformance "We screwed up. We had never seen the CBS video when we claimed that it took WTC 7 6.5 seconds to collapse. We only relied on the street video that does not show the Penthouses. By the time we saw the CBS video, we had so much invested in the 6.5-second collapse time, we could not disappoint our supporters who were successfully using the 6.5 free fall time to push 9/11 Truth. We just ignored the evidence." -- Steven Jones
@greywolf424 so how can you explain the molten metal under #7 if a plane didn't hit it & the fuel didn't travel down the elevator shafts? Thermal images depict the same temps as the other two buildings. How is that even possible? # 1&2 were Bravo fires and # 7 was Alpha fires? There's no way that Alpha fires in an open facility will reach temperatures to even come remotely close to effecting A-36 steel, let-a-lone make it collapse. The owner was even recorded saying "take it down."
@greywolf424 if the owner wasn't recorded on video then who was it? Did you see him trying to back out? Watch the video and watch how he reacts and explains "what he really meant"... lol
@greywolf424 Well, FYI it has been reported, recorded and documented that molten steel was pouring out of the towers in various locations/sections, it was also reported, recorded & documented by various agencies, as well as by the clean up and rescue workers, ie: Firefighters, cops, military, civilians, etc. If there is no truth in this then why was Molten steel present a month after the buildings fell? Did you research the temperature at which A-36 steel turns into a liquid/molten steel? No???
@greywolf424 seeing that you are so quick to say people are liars etc why not put forth your evidence that it wasn't an inside job and that it was strictly an act of a few renegade/extremists muslims... hahaha This I have to hear...
@greywolf424 So... with all of your infinit wisdom, explain in detail how 3 buildings fell, 2 by plane and their fuel and the other by random alpha fires? hahaha you can't and that's the best part. hahaha
@greywolf424 We'll focus on #7 and then move on to #1 and #2. Building #7, (Alpha fire vs a building composed of A-36 structural steel)... Based on the type of steel used, the age of the steel, as well as the shape, design and thickness of this steel, there is no possible way that the entire building is weakend by alpha fires so perfectly that it collapses in on itself... Seriously? He said THEY decided to pull IT... he made a $6,985,000,000 profit to have these buildings destroyed. Hmmmmm?
@greywolf424 hahaha I'm glad that you believe what you say... lol. So how much money did he get after he won his legal battle with his insurance company?... hahaha. This is too funny, you remind me of an epsiode of the Dave Chappelle show... Where the black blind man was the leader of the KKK. hahaha
@greywolf424 So... with all of your infinite wisdom, explain in detail how 3 buildings fell, 2 by plane and their fuel and the other by random alpha fires? hahaha you can't and that's the best part. hahaha
@FifePerformance OH YOU MAY THINK YOUR "ALPHA, BRAVO" FIRE HORSE SHIT SOUNDS TECHNICAL AND IMPRESSIVE, BUT REALLY IT IS MEANINGLESS SMOKE AND MIRRORS....
the real 'truth' is actually more interesting, a lot more complex and actually useful to society.
Alex jones is a douchebag
dylan avery is a douchebag
Steven jones is a fraud, no other physicians agree with him
jason bermas is a douchebag
it did look like explosives but a tranny looks like a woman but is still a man, you know why,.. because EVIDENCE of her chromosomes would tell you so.
@intruda11 I have a question. If I wanted to get information about this in order for me to have a better time pwning 9/11 truthers, where3 would I get it?
Just so you know I see the NIST. I mean other than that.
I could not help my self but I must reply to the ignorance you speak of. The events of 9/11 and the destruction of the towers were controlled demolitions, you must be a fucking moron if you cannot realize that. There is too much evidence to believe otherwise! So wake the fuck up
for every "physics" professor there are countless structural engineers that will say otherwise. I am a structural engineering student, and a physics professor really holds no authority when talking about the structural composition of buildings. Holds about as much authority on this topic as the guy bagging your groceries. Seriously
@callsen159 Good, you are a structural engineering student. I don't know much so I will ask you. Do you think the towers could of been weakened enough. by the jets.
WTC7 is the best evidence that there was NOT a controlled demolition. Why? This is proved by Steven E Jones. How did he prove this? He proved this by proving that a group of perpetrators had absolutely NO problems by smuggling in, place and set, tons of explosives in WTC1+2 without ever being noticed by 25,000 tenants. Perpetrators who are this attention shy will have NO problems focussing NO attention on themselves by taking any evidence out of WTC7 instead of blowing up WTC7. QED.
Well Stephen Jones your evidence is pretty factual and unshakable but unfortunately the American public will not believe you because they've been taught to "Trust" only what the major newspaper and television networks tell them!!!!
Yeah, well it isn't just the American public who think Jones is a kook. You Truthers are such a bunch of fantasy dissidents that you think you're fighting against the American government. You're simply making a laughing stock of yourselves.
They are fighting against the fascist American Govt who "instigated and perpetrated" the so-called Terrorist Attacks of 911.Forget your lame fantasy charges because you just can't argue with the math and the physics of how the WTC Towers and bldg no.7 came down!!!
i urge everyone to watch the documentary Zero: an investigation into 911. very well produced. the video lags just a second behind the sound but is still very watchable and i Highly reccomend it!! Spread the word!
IF BIN ladin did it why he cant do any thing like that again not in america but any other countries god bless u america for what u did and always do in arab countries oh the end is coming to all murder
Worldcom was in trouble for some time, much of the time a discovery process is utilized before official investigations begin, it's not clear whether I read "investigations" or that's just where they kept records of these criminals. My apologies!
The CIA office was reinforced with windows that could withstand a blast and that area was in plain view of the WTC where they can navigate jets into buildings.
Giuliani started an office for emergency management which was located in building 7, but that was never HIS office.
"Enron was under suspicion since july 2001
Worldcom was in trouble for some time..."
...but there would be no evidence kept in the building at that time. Why would there be? They weren't under investigation yet, and there would be multiple copies of any of their findings.
"The CIA office was reinforced with windows that could withstand a blast and that area was in plain view of the WTC..."
You obviously never saw the twin towers up close if you think you can see them well enough from across the street to fly planes into them. You'd need to be in the sky, or across the water in Brooklyn to fly a plane into the twin towers, if you're across the street in a building your view is very restricted.
"I wasn't posting to you, but to Lefty. Lefty, explain why building 7 went down... "
Besides the massive amount of structural damage including all the support beams on a lower floor leaning at an angle after the debris from the larger towers struck building 7?
Why don't you explain what anyone gains from demolishing building 7? Think about it before you post, don't give off some stupid answer like "To invade Iraq!" since we would have done that if only one of the towers fell.
To zakabog: Building 7 contained the CIA 14 floor, SS office with investigation ongoing against World Com and Enron, Mayor Guilliano's office where he decided not to be that day and an extremely stupid place to put his office considering that 300 yards away was the location of the 1991 WTC bombing....
Jones is a sloppy scientist. He once described how he got that piece of steel slag. Some woman took it off a piece of recovered steel on its way to be part of a memorial structure. It's welding slag. There is no manganese in thermite. Not much chromium in structural, as opposed to tool steel. Read his paper on Itzamna-as-Jesus, then google crucifiction and you will see how sloppy the fool is.
Hmm looks like we got an undercover propaganda specialist here trying to pose as a stupid fucking inbred redneck with a 40 I.Q who just sits and watches Fox news with his girlfriend / mother. Fucking idiot.
He got a sample the only way he could, but his tests on the sample are very scientific, and his scientific testing of the dust from 9-11 has been confirmed by 3 other independent labs, which proves thatnhis work is scientific and accurate. Show us his "sloppy work on his "Itzamna-as-Jesus" paper. I did not find anything googling crucifiction he might be wrong but his science is very solid maybe you don't understand the proper scientific method?
Pre-Christian cultures are full of dying and resurrected deities, to include Egypt, Greece, the Inana/Damuzi cult and several Meso-American culture. The "stigmata" in Itzamna's hands are not holes but sources of heat. Laying-on-of-hands is part of every shamanistic cult. Itzamna had a wife and children. Jones has bugger-all.
No forensic scientist in the world is even interested in a sample of unknown provenance. Jones should realize his molten iron is probably slag from a cutting torch.
Slag from a cutting torch does not create a pool of friggin lava under the WTC rubble. Jones does say that some of the dust samples could have possible contained slag from a cutting torch but recently new uncontaminated samples have been recovered in a vacant building close to the WTC that would be untainted by the possibility of slag exposure. The new samples support his findings.
there was no pool of lava. The NASA imaging shows temperatures consistant with a buried Class A fire. A pool of molten metal big enough to retain heat for more than a day would have to be bloody huge, and no pig of cast iron that big was recovered from the site. Don't cite me what a Nazi rag like AFpN and Chris the Fugitive from justice bollyn tells us Loizeaux said. Bollyn lies a lot. There was no uncontaminated site in NYC a day after clean-up started.
A. Video, and testimony from workers at the site prove the molten steel.
B. Video of the molten steel exiting the building before collapse. Later to be reported by experts at molten aluminum.
C. If 911 was an inside job do you really think NASA who is practically 100% government funded would release evidence that would be damning to the media??
The fire fighters saw molten metal under WTC6 which could very well be brass. That flows when it is red. Steel does not. The metal pouring out of the building was more likely lead from the batteries at Fuji Bank. Your NASA comment is irrelevant and vague. I didn't say asbestos is safe. Building 7 collapsed progressively because a building fell on it, broke it, and set it on fire.
What the hell has the temperature of a jet fuel fire have to do with WTC 6? Those were Class A fires, with temps of 1800F not unusual. Tell your crap to someonne who has never sorted out crap in the ruins of a building that burned down. Brass melts in large building fires. Tell someone who has never worked with a plumber that lead will not glow red before it evaporates.
Tell someone with less than a 125 IQ that yours is above room temp.
LMAO. Left you really need to check your facts. A class "A" fire is described as..
"most common type of fire"
"Class-A fires are commonly used in controlled circumstances, such as a campfire, match or wood burning stove"
Challenge to any reader. Get your wood burning stove as hot as you can and throw a piece of brass in it. See if it turns into lava lol. Most firepokers are made out of brass. I leave mine in there all night.
Less than 125 IQ? am I hurting your feelings? haha
Well, you just proved that you are either a liar or dummer than a sack of balsa wood sledge hammers. Class A fire are fires burning in solid fuels such as wood, paper and fabric. Get a clue, dummy, the first people to cast brass melted it in wood-burning fires. Just need to aerate it a bit.
I now calculate your IQ at 90, because you are sort of literate in one language. Fail.
Wow!! You did some research lol. Good for you! I give you two thumbs up you genius you lol. Now lets look at how this brass was created with wood kelns in extremely controlled environments with constant attention to air flow and situation of the metals.
"Ancient smelting was laborious at best: to keep the fire hot enough, assistants (most likely slaves) would have to pump bellows for long periods"
I don't even know why I am arguing with a guy about building "6" lol.
jsaint79: good idea use facts, funny how that works. Also good to point out that the fires were not hot enough or burn long enough to melt steel or brass either. AT least according to the physical evidence NIST found
Only to dimwits with no fire fighting experience were those fire not hot enough. Class A fuels in office fires can aise the temps to 1800F easily. Add all the nitrates available in WTC 6, you are going to get a hell of a lot more heat, easil;y enough to melt brass. And onlt twoofer morons are saying that ANY steel melted.
The NIST report does not support your opinion. The evidence supports the fact that the fires did not burn long enough or hot enough to weaken the steel columns. It was not hot enough or long enough to melt brass either, at least acording to the physical evidence NIST investigators reported. Even the goverment "story" doesn't support your ideas. I am not sure where you get them, but the facts did not give them to you
The NASA images showed pockets of fire under the pile that would have been adequete to melt brass. You don't even have to weaken steel much to make it fail due to creep when it is heated unevenly. I once knew a man who wreckaed a train and wiped out a tank battalion by putting coins between railroad tracks and letting the sun tear the tracks loose from the rail bed.Since some columns were destroyed in impact in the towers, it would not have taken mch thermal expansion to over-stress joints.
steel needs a very hot fire for a very long time to weaken it, the NIST investigation reported that most of the steel columns were exposed to temps up to 250C, a very small % of perimeter columns were exposed to temps up to 600C. The NASA thermal images showed surface temps that were very hot, not what the temps were under the pile, and they did not show "pockets of fire" under the pile. One can assume that temps were hotter in the middle of the pile
what does placing a coin on railroad tracks have to do with the steel of the 3 WTC buildings? The structure below the impact area had no evidence of damage and this area was designed to hold up quite a bit more then the building above it. the columns in the basement held up the whole building, the columns on the 50 floor held up everything above it, with at least a safety factor of 2 for the core columns and 5 for the perimeter columns. But they gave the same resistance as air, weird huh?
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks to 9/11 the Physics Profession has spent a decade proving that physics is history.
It can be rewritten to serve anybodies agenda.
watch?v=ZT4BXIpdIdo
psikeyhackr 3 months ago
What does he know..... He's just a physics professor.
The conclusion is..... Thermite was used!
TheMattswish 9 months ago
@TheMattswish
physics has everything to do with things like this!!
do somee reseaarchh on this guy if you doubt him so much. hahahaha
elstrangebedfellow 7 months ago
@elstrangebedfellow
I'm sorry, but I should have realized that people have a hard time sensing sarcasm over the internet.
TheMattswish 7 months ago
@TheMattswish
ohh yeah totally, it is pretty hard to sense it on here. apology accepted.
elstrangebedfellow 7 months ago
evidence is piling up?? in your fantasy head. your a physics professor. wtf...that sparking flame could be a sparkler someone head in their desk for all you know. that doesnt mean its so. you form steel with prolonged burning. the place had slow burning diesel. that place was burning for weeks.
abortfailure7646 11 months ago
@abortfailure7646 LOL a sparkler!?!? hahahaha really?! a giant fucking sparkler like the size of a car?? LOL YOU ARE A HELPESS RETARD
northwestblazinfire 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Remote control plane full of thermite .. nobody had to plant anything .. clean job ..wow
2020starman 1 year ago
Does the professor not know that aluminum and magnesium can burn on their own?
mrtommynazi 1 year ago
Never actually "foned" anybody.... I have phoned thousands though
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 hahaha
ooooooooooooooh , so u understood that 1?
u could not stand in a witness box, and not be tore an extra asshole
hahaha
u lost again
CLOWN.
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
ALL THESE GROUPS FULLY SUPPORT AND ENDORSE THE OFFICIAL STORY.....
American Consulting Engineers Council (ACEC)
American Society for Precision Engineering (ASPE)
Society of Engineering Science (SES)
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE)
American Concrete Institute (ACI)
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
European Association for Structural Dynamics
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 hahaha play of words man.... the dumb will believe anything and you obviously believe the lie... I bet you voted for Obama... hahahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@greywolf424 I'm still waiting for you to give factual evidence to dispute everything in detail to proove once & for all that what happened was strictly due to the planes.
Why was there molten steel under the 3 buildings?
How thick was that A-36 steel?
What R the properties of A-36 steel?
Was there a fire at every support column on #7 that caused an even collapse?
What other building constructed with A-36 steel fell due to fire?
How many skyscrapers have fallen due to plane strikes?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE SHIT, YOU ARE THE ONE MAKING CLAIMS IT IS NOT POSSIBLE EVEN THOUGH THOUSANDS OF EXPERTS SAY THAT IT IS, AND YOU ARE THE ONE WHO CAN'T PRODUCE A SHRED OF PROOF
greywolf424 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greywolf424 STILL WAITING ON THE ANSWERS TO THESE
Why was there molten steel under the 3 buildings?
How thick was that A-36 steel?
What R the properties of A-36 steel?
Was there a fire at every support column on #7 that caused an even collapse?
What other building constructed with A-36 steel fell due to fire?
How many skyscrapers have fallen due to plane strikes?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greywolf424 I'M STILL WAITING FOR THE ANSWERS
Why was there molten steel under the 3 buildings?
How thick was that A-36 steel?
What R the properties of A-36 steel?
Was there a fire at every support column on #7 that caused an even collapse?
What other building constructed with A-36 steel fell due to fire?
How many skyscrapers have fallen due to plane strikes?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greywolf424 I'M STILL WAITING FOR THE ANSWERS
Why was there molten steel under the 3 buildings?
How thick was that A-36 steel?
What R the properties of A-36 steel?
Was there a fire at every support column on #7 that caused an even collapse?
What other building constructed with A-36 steel fell due to fire?
How many skyscrapers have fallen due to plane strikes?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
Comment removed
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@greywolf424 I'M WAITING FOR YOUR ANSWERS
Why was there molten metal/steel under the 3 building?
Watch the Vid when they're removing the beams, if it's not molten steel then what other metals were used in the construction or Demo?
How thick was the A-36 steel?
What R the Properties of A-36?
Were there fires at every support column on #7 that caused an even collapse?
What other building contrsucted with A-36 steel fell due to fire?
How many skyscrapers have fallen due to plane strikes?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "if it's not molten steel"
.
IT'S NOT MOLTEN, IT IS SIMPLY GLOWING MR. METALLURGIST.... CLEARLY YOU CAN'T TELL THE DIFFERENCE.
.
"What other building contrsucted with A-36 steel fell due to fire?"
.
THOUSANDS OF WAREHOUSE FIRES.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 we're not talking about warehouses... hahaha that's totally different... hahaha
When the material is in liquid form and pouring out and puddled up it's molten... you're loosing...
JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS THAT I ASKED AND I'LL SHOW YOU THE PROOF BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION. I know that's why you're not answering them. lol
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "we're not talking about warehouses... "
.
WAREHOUSES ARE MADE WITH A-36 STEEL ASSHOLE, SO YES WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THEM
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 Warehouses don't see the load factor or the structural complexity as skyscrapers... you're a dumbass and I like that about you... you make me laugh bro... lol
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT SKYSCRAPERS ASSHOLE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE EFFECTS OF FIRE ON A-36 STEEL.....
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 we are talking about skyscrapers and the A-36 steel used... and with that we're talking about the structural design/strength/thicknesses of the steel. How many skyscrapers have fallen due to fires? How long did they burn? etc etc... Come on man... do research. "THE TRUTH WILL SET YOUR FREE!" hahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance WRONG ASSHOLE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A-36 STEEL REMEMBER.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 Sure do, A-36 structurual steel. The type of steel, the thickness of steel, the shape/design of the steel will dictate how it reacts to heat. ARE YOU GOING TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS CORKY?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance "A-36 structurual steel. "
.
THE EXACT TYPED USED TO BUILD WAREHOUSES.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance YOU ASKED "HOW MANY BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED WITH A-36 STEEL HAVE COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE", SINCE ALMOST EVERY WAREHOUSE IN THE WESTERN WORLD ARE BUILT WITH A-36 STEEL IT IS SAFE TO SAY THOUSANDS......
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 I want facts man... how many skyscrapers have fallen due to fires... how long did they burn for? At what temps did they burn at? and how is that they didn't collapse in a heep? Why wasn't there molten metal in the center of the rubbish? lol YOU'RE LOOSING
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance OH NOW YOU'RE CHANGING YOUR STORY AFTER ALL THE YAPPING ABOUT A-36 STEEL
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 I'm still laughing how you compared warehouse structures to skyscraper structures... hahahaha I have to crash inorder to get some sleep for uncle sam... Keep it real CORKY. hahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance SAME TYPE OF STEEL YOU UNEDUCATED PRICK
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 Warehouse Structures vs Skyscraper Structures are like comparing a straw house to a WWII German re-inforced rebar/concrete bunker... Corky, you lost! That right there says it all man... Not only did you lose the race but you're still retarded... No worries Corky, I still got love for you. You make me laugh!!!
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance SAME STEEL ASSHOLE AND YOU WHERE CRYING ABOUT THE FIRE EFFECTS OF A-36 STEEL, NOW YOU'RE TRYING TO CHANGE THE STORY.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance BUT YOU NEED TO GET UP AT 330 FOR YOUR SHIFT AT MC DONALDS, BET HEAD OFF TO BED
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance ask grey pubes , if he has fone in mark stevens radio show and make his point , on air,??
grey pubes commes out with alot of abusive rants, but when the chips are down,,, well he rants some more and runs away..
just ask him , see what he does..
thanx my man
peace
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 Sorry, all I read is........ whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...... wha...........whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
greywolf424 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greywolf424 hehe
nice to show any1 who reads these posts , what and where u comming from.
well done.
u are proving to all what a debunker is all about.
NOTHING
A BIG WOOO HOOOOO VOID
:~)
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 sorry, one more time.... all I am getting is whaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...... wha........ whaa.............. whaaaaaaaaaa...... so weird.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 I KNOW U ARE SUFFERING FROM COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
GOOGLE IT.. U WILL SEE THAT IT JUST you
haha
and u pretend to understand anything?
yeh,,
pretend.
haha
uare a fake,
and a zionist
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 ohhhh nope, just more whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa......... wha........................... whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sorry
greywolf424 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 hahaha yeah man...
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance DON'T CHANGE THE FACT THAT AFTER MORE THAN NINE YEARS ASSHOLES LIKE YOU STILL CAN'T PRODUCE A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURTROOM ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 u keep saying that comment
but i have handed ur sorry ass, back to u, again and again
and u just run and run
so did u fone the radio station for a live debate ?
NO U DID NOT
U JUST RAN
LOL
:~)
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 geeeze man, still just getting whaaaaaaaaaaaaa...... wha..............whaaaaaaaaaaaa..... gunna have to try harder.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance ask him if he is ZIONIST?
i have proved over the last month or so. that he is .a real zionist
ask him about isreal .
i have found the shit that he is.
with all his abusive rants
hehe
go on
hahaha
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 Sorry, just more of the same, whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....................wha..................whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
greywolf424 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 greywolf424 is nothing but special... He's our CORKY!!!! hahaha He's still trying to find his baseball.
Keep it real bigbrother, 0330 is coming early for me. I can't wait to see what he writes tomorrow. hahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 YOU ARE STUPID
OFCOND 1 year ago
@OFCOND well my and greypubes comments have been going for over 1 month, on the FREE MAN movement etc. and then 9/11. the man follows me like a crack whore, wanting her next fix. either way he is admmitingly a zionist. he had been invited to a live radio show to put his case forward, but ran away. and u make a judgement on the last 2% of something, is not going to be seen as very clever either. so perhaps a revaluation on your behalf, or may be not. either way , i dont care.
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@FifePerformance YOU ARE THE ONE LOSING ASSHOLE, I HAVE BEEN DESTROYING SOCK PUPPET SHILLS LIKE YOU FOR YEARS..... BOTTOM LINE YOU DON'T HAVE A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURTROOM ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET AFTER MORE THAN NINE YEARS
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 hey grey pubes,,, did u fone in mark stevens radio show, and make your points live on air..
come on man,
we are want to have a laugh at your expense
hahaha
come on be abusive now..
hahaha
:~)
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 Try again man, all I am seeing is, whaaaaaaaaaaaaa........ wha..... wha.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@bigbrother1994 he doesn't understand the differences between warehouse structures and skyscraper structures. He doesn't understand that fact these skyscrapers and their structural supports/design were made to take a plane impact, that they were designed to withstand fires, he doesn't understand that a vast majority of the fuel was burned on impact, he doesn't understand that molten steel under the buildings couldn't have been produced by the fuel of the planes, Or by alpha fires in #7... lol
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance "differences between warehouse structures and skyscraper structures."
.
YOU WERE YAPPING ABOUT A-36 STEEL FUCKTARD NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THE STORY
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "doesn't understand that molten steel under the buildings "
.
WHICH YOU DON'T HAVE A SHRED OF PROOF TO BACK UP
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 u dont have a proof that u are not a zionist , but u still are 1
hahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahaha
hahahahhaa
hahaha
haha
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@FifePerformance U as i have found out along time ago,that these clowns see things in abstract from,all in little boxes,seperate from each other
this way it makes it easier in their head to sort of argue each point,in its little delusional way
bottom line is,that u will find that there is no point to debate with them,because debate isnt what they are realy afte
its to bog u down
its like if u truly believe in GOD(creator)then u dont need structure(religion)
but do ask him
see what he does
bigbrother1994 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "When the material is in liquid form and pouring out and puddled up it's molten... you're loosing..."
.
AND YOU HAVE NO PROOF IT WAS STEEL..... NONE.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 Check it out man, I have to wake up a 0330 to go to work for uncle sam, I don't get off work tomorrow until 1830 tomorrow... by the time I get home it'll be roughly 1945, that should give you plenty of time to google, research and have a semi-decent and half-assed response to make a comical arguement. Good luck buddy, millions are depending on your intuitive response.
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance DON'T NEED TO.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "Why was there molten steel under the 3 buildings?"
,
THERE WAS MOLTEN "METAL" WHICH YOU HAVE ZERO PROOF THAT WAS STEEL AND LESS THAN ZERO PROOF THAT IT WAS A-36 STEEL
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 I'll show you the proof as soon as you start answering the questions honestly with detailed & factual answers. You keep dodging these answers or you toss out blanket statements and hide behind a few "credited sources" which bow to the dollar & pressure of the Gov't. Why is it that most of Europe says inside job, why is it that majority of the world says we did it? I've been overseas MANY times my friend. I was there when they came down & I just came back & it seems truth still wins.
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance "I'll show you the proof "
.
YOU DON'T HAVE A SINGLE SHRED OF PROOF THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURTROOM ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance YOU DON'T HAVE A SINGLE SHRED OF PROOF THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURTROOM ON THE PLANET......
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "Why is it that most of Europe says inside job, "
.
BECAUSE YOU'RE LYING ABOUT IT.
.
"why is it that majority of the world says we did it? "
.
ANOTHER FLAGRANT LIE.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 Hurry up man... GOOGLE a COMEBACK!!! hahahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance FOR SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE A CERTIFIED METALLURGIST YOU CERTAINLY DON'T KNOW A FUCK OF A LOT ABOUT CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS.
greywolf424 1 year ago
NOTE WHAT JONES SAYS "We just ignored the evidence" QUITE COMMON FOR TWOOFERS TO IGNORE ANYTHING THAT DOESN'T SUPPORT THEIR FAIRY TALE..
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 You can live behind your facade about Innocent America, & how it wouldn't do such a thing as to bring down the towers & sacrifice the lives of innocent American but, the fact of the matter is, Our country was founded on corruption, lies & deceit "for the good of man". I love what this country stood for & I honestly dislike how it is, yet, I'm still in the Military trying to hold on to what America used to be. And the more I learn and look into our History the more I get disgusted.
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance "There's no way that Alpha fires in an open facility will reach temperatures to even come remotely close to effecting A-36 steel"
,
EASILY PROVEN LIE........ A HYDROCARBON FIRE COULD EASILY WEAKEN THE STEEL........
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance @FifePerformance EASILY PROVEN LIES........ A HYDROCARBON FIRE COULD EASILY WEAKEN THE STEEL........
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 hahaha yeah so an alpha fire weakend A-36 steel to the point of complete structural failure... lol. that in itself tells me that you don't know shit... hahahaha... ahhh man, that was a good laugh... thanks man!
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance "that in itself tells me that you don't know shit... "
.
THE FACT YOU CONTINUE TO LIE ABOUT IT *PROVES* YOU ARE THE ONE WHO DOESN'T KNOW SHIT...
greywolf424 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance THE FACT YOU CONTINUE TO LIE PROVES YOU ARE THE ONE WHO DOESN'T KNOW SHIT......
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance HYDROCARBON FIRES WEAKEN STEEL LOSER..... PROVEN FACT.
greywolf424 1 year ago
Amazing, 3 years after this video was posted on YouTube and still no one is in jail, no one had to give back insurance money, nothing. Treason is punishable by death and the people involved should remember that.
sniffy45 1 year ago
We are sheep being led to the slaughter. Not enough people will wake up, good bye cruel world.
Gravalgia 1 year ago
You're not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it. MALCOLM X
BangEmOutProductions 1 year ago
Who should I believe a Physics Professor Or the Government that lied to us before? hmmm.......
DragonLord7667 1 year ago
no thermate, no explosives, was a plane and jet fuel, please start using your brain...
RageagainstRacism 1 year ago
the so called 9/11 commissions report shouldn't be a basis for information on these attacks, this isn't something morons are skeptical of, we're talking about architects, engineers, some smart people who know more about physics than most people on this page trying to comment and say everyone who is skeptical is a douchebag, sorry, but that's not an argument, BE SKEPTICAL, and don't swallow the bullshit we're fed on a regular basis. nothing wrong with that....
alexandearth 1 year ago
Excuse me, this guy is not an Engineer, he was fired from his Job and the Entire Engineering Department at BYU did look at his ideas, and they said he is completley wrong....The group Architects is bogus,,,they have like 2 people with any experience...they do not really have 1000 members. thats why you only ever see this guy and griffin and gage.they are the only ones really...and his evidence is contaminated, and does NOT SHOW THERMITE. He Knows the results are properly interpreted as Negative
JPPolachek 1 year ago
@JPPolachek I'm a machinist and a certified metallurgist. There is no way that the jet fuel carried by the planes could have reached the necessary temperatures needed to melt or structurally weaken the vast majority of the A-36 steel used in the construction of the towers. WTC 7 shows the same thermal temps as WTC 1 and WTC 2 but, WTC 7 was never hit by a plane. How do 3 buildings collapse in the same manner, two by claim of fuel from planes and the other by localized internal "alpha" fires???
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance Clearly you're not very good at your job.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 It's obvious that you haven't got the slightest clue. Do some research, Find the composition of A-36 steel, understand the percentages of the various properties in the steel, what/why they're there etc, find the temp at which the A-36 steel turns into a "liquid". Once you find that look at the "Mush" zone. (partially solid/partially liquid). now tell me what you learned. Look at some of the video of the metal pouring out of the towers, research what it takes for it to do that.
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance wrong you lying piece of shit..... cowering behind a sock puppet shill account
.
Channel Views:
96
Total Upload Views:
112
Age:
32
Joined:
July 30, 2009"
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 wow, this explains a lot... So I take it that you didn't take the information/suggestion and research on your own behalf to find the truth? I ask you, who's the puppet?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance "ind the temp at which the A-36 steel turns into a "liquid"."
.
NO ONE OTHER THAN LYING ASSHOLES LIKE YOU EVER CLAIMED IT DID
greywolf424 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance Find the temp at which the A-36 steel turns into a "liquid".
.
NO ONE OTHER THAN LYING ASSHOLES LIKE YOU EVER CLAIMED IT DID, AND YOU CAN'T PRODUCE A SHRED OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CLAIM...........
greywolf424 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance @FifePerformance Find the temp at which the A-36 steel turns into a "liquid"..........
.
NO ONE OTHER THAN LYING ASSHOLES LIKE YOU EVER CLAIMED IT DID, AND YOU CAN'T PRODUCE A SHRED OF EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CLAIM...........
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance NOT ONE OTHER THAN LYING ASSHOLES LIKE YOU COWERING BEHIND SOCK PUPPET SHILL ACCOUNTS EVER CLAIMED IT MELTED...... AND YOU HAVE NO SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIABLE PROOF TO SUPPORT THE CLAIM AFTER NINE YEARS.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 Fuck you TRAITOR!!!!!!!!!!!!
whyohwhyfools 1 year ago
@whyohwhyfools LOSER
greywolf424 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greywolf424 Treachery is your middle name you cock sucking mother fucker!
whyohwhyfools 1 year ago
@whyohwhyfools Hey man don't let greywolf424 get your goat. He obviously thinks that Corporate America wouldn't do such a thing. I wonder why the owner of the WTC's updated his Insurance policy shortly before the towers fell. It was all staged, we know it, some just don't want to believe it. GreyWolf424 doesn't know any better. GreyWolf = Canis lupus. They're known for partially consuming their food & in this case he's known for partially devouring the facts of reality which dictate inside job.
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance FACT IS AFTER OVER NINE YEARS YOU STILL DON'T HAVE ONE SINGLE PIECE OF LEGALLY ACTIONABLE OR SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE THAT WILL STAND UP IN ANY COURT ROOM ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET TO SUPPORT YOUR MOLTEN STEEL HORSE SHIT (MOLTEN METAL, WHICH DOES NOT MEAN OR PROVE STEEL IS WHAT WAS REPORTED LIAR) .......
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "They're known for partially consuming their food "
.
ANOTHER STEAMING PILE OF HORSE SHIT
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "We screwed up. We had never seen the CBS video when we claimed that it took WTC 7 6.5 seconds to collapse. We only relied on the street video that does not show the Penthouses. By the time we saw the CBS video, we had so much invested in the 6.5-second collapse time, we could not disappoint our supporters who were successfully using the 6.5 free fall time to push 9/11 Truth. We just ignored the evidence." -- Steven Jones
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 so how can you explain the molten metal under #7 if a plane didn't hit it & the fuel didn't travel down the elevator shafts? Thermal images depict the same temps as the other two buildings. How is that even possible? # 1&2 were Bravo fires and # 7 was Alpha fires? There's no way that Alpha fires in an open facility will reach temperatures to even come remotely close to effecting A-36 steel, let-a-lone make it collapse. The owner was even recorded saying "take it down."
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FifePerformance "There's no way that Alpha fires in an open facility will reach temperatures to even come remotely close to effecting A-36 steel"
.
PROVEN LIE.... A HYDROCARBON FIRE COULD EASILY HOT ENOUGH TO WEAKEN THE STEEL
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "The owner was even recorded saying "take it down." "
.
ANOTHER LIE FROM THE SOCK PUPPET SHILL
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 if the owner wasn't recorded on video then who was it? Did you see him trying to back out? Watch the video and watch how he reacts and explains "what he really meant"... lol
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance THEY OWNER SAID "THEY" DESIDED TO PULL IT, WHICH MEANT PULL OUT THE FIRE FIGHTERS.... LYING ASSHOLE
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 Well, FYI it has been reported, recorded and documented that molten steel was pouring out of the towers in various locations/sections, it was also reported, recorded & documented by various agencies, as well as by the clean up and rescue workers, ie: Firefighters, cops, military, civilians, etc. If there is no truth in this then why was Molten steel present a month after the buildings fell? Did you research the temperature at which A-36 steel turns into a liquid/molten steel? No???
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "it has been reported, recorded and documented that molten steel was pouring out of the towers in various locations/sections,"
.
IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS SOME MOLTEN METAL.... THERE IS NO PROOF IT WAS STEEL.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@FifePerformance ====== SOCK PUPPET SHILL ACCOUNT, THE PURPOSE OF WHICH IS TO POST LIES AND DISINFORMATION.
.
Channel Views: 101
Total Upload Views: 112
Age: 32
Joined: July 30, 2009
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 seeing that you are so quick to say people are liars etc why not put forth your evidence that it wasn't an inside job and that it was strictly an act of a few renegade/extremists muslims... hahaha This I have to hear...
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance "why not put forth your evidence that it wasn't an inside job "
.
SIMPLE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS THERE WAS ONE.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 So... with all of your infinit wisdom, explain in detail how 3 buildings fell, 2 by plane and their fuel and the other by random alpha fires? hahaha you can't and that's the best part. hahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance MORE MEANINGLESS GIBERISH ABOUT "ALPHA" FIRES, HOW COMICAL.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 We'll focus on #7 and then move on to #1 and #2. Building #7, (Alpha fire vs a building composed of A-36 structural steel)... Based on the type of steel used, the age of the steel, as well as the shape, design and thickness of this steel, there is no possible way that the entire building is weakend by alpha fires so perfectly that it collapses in on itself... Seriously? He said THEY decided to pull IT... he made a $6,985,000,000 profit to have these buildings destroyed. Hmmmmm?
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance MORE MEANINGLESS BABBLE ABOUT AN "ALPHA" FIRE, NOTHING MORE THAN A FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION.
.
"there is no possible way that the entire building is weakend by alpha fires "
.
PLENTY OF INDEPENDENT STUDIED PROVE YOU ARE A LIAR.
.
"he made a $6,985,000,000 profit to have these buildings destroyed. H"
.
NO HE DIDN'T, HE IS STILL PAYING THE LEASE ON BUILDINGS THAT NO LONGER EXIST. TELL US ANOTHER LIE ASSHOLE, THIS IS TOO EASY.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@greywolf424 hahaha I'm glad that you believe what you say... lol. So how much money did he get after he won his legal battle with his insurance company?... hahaha. This is too funny, you remind me of an epsiode of the Dave Chappelle show... Where the black blind man was the leader of the KKK. hahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@greywolf424 So... with all of your infinite wisdom, explain in detail how 3 buildings fell, 2 by plane and their fuel and the other by random alpha fires? hahaha you can't and that's the best part. hahaha
FifePerformance 1 year ago
@FifePerformance OH YOU MAY THINK YOUR "ALPHA, BRAVO" FIRE HORSE SHIT SOUNDS TECHNICAL AND IMPRESSIVE, BUT REALLY IT IS MEANINGLESS SMOKE AND MIRRORS....
greywolf424 1 year ago
@alexandearth i agree...there is nothing more i can say except for a conclusion that the government did it.
chrisusv08 1 year ago
EXPLOSIVES WERENT USED
read the NIST report
stop fantacising
the real 'truth' is actually more interesting, a lot more complex and actually useful to society.
Alex jones is a douchebag
dylan avery is a douchebag
Steven jones is a fraud, no other physicians agree with him
jason bermas is a douchebag
it did look like explosives but a tranny looks like a woman but is still a man, you know why,.. because EVIDENCE of her chromosomes would tell you so.
I.e. dont judge a book by its cover.
intruda11 2 years ago
@intruda11 I have a question. If I wanted to get information about this in order for me to have a better time pwning 9/11 truthers, where3 would I get it?
Just so you know I see the NIST. I mean other than that.
UncomfortableSilence 2 years ago
@intruda11
I could not help my self but I must reply to the ignorance you speak of. The events of 9/11 and the destruction of the towers were controlled demolitions, you must be a fucking moron if you cannot realize that. There is too much evidence to believe otherwise! So wake the fuck up
BudoChild 1 year ago
@BudoChild loose change has taught us so much. lets keep watching over and over.
mth03d 1 year ago
@intruda11
Ok, maybe you should first learn some terms before you say anything. Steven Jones is no physician (doctor). He is a PHYSICIST.
XguitrfreekX 1 year ago
@intruda11 and don't judge the book by its own cover too!what u believe is just a cover story. i'm sorry to say the real douchebag is BUSH.
chrisusv08 1 year ago
I must see this dvd. Thanks for uploading :)
TheSamara89kitten 2 years ago
Why did Steven Jones put gloves on to pick up that speck of metal?
angrysoba 2 years ago
for every "physics" professor there are countless structural engineers that will say otherwise. I am a structural engineering student, and a physics professor really holds no authority when talking about the structural composition of buildings. Holds about as much authority on this topic as the guy bagging your groceries. Seriously
callsen159 2 years ago 2
@callsen159 Good, you are a structural engineering student. I don't know much so I will ask you. Do you think the towers could of been weakened enough. by the jets.
UncomfortableSilence 2 years ago
is usama bin laden a code?cia and fbi spelling of his name?the anagram for this is ...and in U.S.A.,blame !!!
aifammafiaaifam 2 years ago
Wow this video links to 911revisited that links 911blogger that links to.... Looks like the conspiracy is a conspiracy.. :D
BryanFury22 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WTC7 is the best evidence that there was NOT a controlled demolition. Why? This is proved by Steven E Jones. How did he prove this? He proved this by proving that a group of perpetrators had absolutely NO problems by smuggling in, place and set, tons of explosives in WTC1+2 without ever being noticed by 25,000 tenants. Perpetrators who are this attention shy will have NO problems focussing NO attention on themselves by taking any evidence out of WTC7 instead of blowing up WTC7. QED.
wimahlers 2 years ago
Comment removed
wimahlers 2 years ago
Well Stephen Jones your evidence is pretty factual and unshakable but unfortunately the American public will not believe you because they've been taught to "Trust" only what the major newspaper and television networks tell them!!!!
OlymPigs2010 2 years ago 8
Yeah, well it isn't just the American public who think Jones is a kook. You Truthers are such a bunch of fantasy dissidents that you think you're fighting against the American government. You're simply making a laughing stock of yourselves.
angrysoba 2 years ago
They are fighting against the fascist American Govt who "instigated and perpetrated" the so-called Terrorist Attacks of 911.Forget your lame fantasy charges because you just can't argue with the math and the physics of how the WTC Towers and bldg no.7 came down!!!
OlymPigs2010 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i urge everyone to watch the documentary Zero: an investigation into 911. very well produced. the video lags just a second behind the sound but is still very watchable and i Highly reccomend it!! Spread the word!
metallicat61003 3 years ago
Lefty sergeant is a sheep to the MEDIA WHORE
TheFirstRufus2001 3 years ago
w ww. voters4ventura. com
cobratip 3 years ago
IF BIN ladin did it why he cant do any thing like that again not in america but any other countries god bless u america for what u did and always do in arab countries oh the end is coming to all murder
kindfaris 3 years ago
George Bush crimped his future plans, thank God!
Vectorjac 3 years ago
great discussion all, just like to say I think lefty is a idiot - with "head in ass" syndrom.
tubeuserrr 3 years ago
Guiliano did have an office in WTC 7,
Enron was under suspicion since july 2001
Worldcom was in trouble for some time, much of the time a discovery process is utilized before official investigations begin, it's not clear whether I read "investigations" or that's just where they kept records of these criminals. My apologies!
The CIA office was reinforced with windows that could withstand a blast and that area was in plain view of the WTC where they can navigate jets into buildings.
tomestubbs 3 years ago
"Guiliano did have an office in WTC 7"
Giuliani started an office for emergency management which was located in building 7, but that was never HIS office.
"Enron was under suspicion since july 2001
Worldcom was in trouble for some time..."
...but there would be no evidence kept in the building at that time. Why would there be? They weren't under investigation yet, and there would be multiple copies of any of their findings.
zakabog 3 years ago
"The CIA office was reinforced with windows that could withstand a blast and that area was in plain view of the WTC..."
You obviously never saw the twin towers up close if you think you can see them well enough from across the street to fly planes into them. You'd need to be in the sky, or across the water in Brooklyn to fly a plane into the twin towers, if you're across the street in a building your view is very restricted.
zakabog 3 years ago
I wasn't posting to you, but to Lefty. Lefty, explain why building 7 went down...
plasticint 3 years ago
"I wasn't posting to you, but to Lefty. Lefty, explain why building 7 went down... "
Besides the massive amount of structural damage including all the support beams on a lower floor leaning at an angle after the debris from the larger towers struck building 7?
Why don't you explain what anyone gains from demolishing building 7? Think about it before you post, don't give off some stupid answer like "To invade Iraq!" since we would have done that if only one of the towers fell.
zakabog 3 years ago
To zakabog: Building 7 contained the CIA 14 floor, SS office with investigation ongoing against World Com and Enron, Mayor Guilliano's office where he decided not to be that day and an extremely stupid place to put his office considering that 300 yards away was the location of the 1991 WTC bombing....
tomestubbs 3 years ago 2
"Building 7 contained the CIA 14 floor"
What would they gain by destroying a CIA office?
"SS office with investigation ongoing against World Com and Enron"
The investigation for Enron started in October 2001, World Com was June, 2002.
"Mayor Guilliano's office where he decided not to be that day..."
The New York City Mayor's office has been in City Hall (on the Manhattan side of the Brooklyn Bridge) since the building was opened back in 1812.
Thanks for demonstrating how little you know.
zakabog 3 years ago
Steven Jones. Another TRUE PATRIOT
kenjams 3 years ago
Jones is a sloppy scientist. He once described how he got that piece of steel slag. Some woman took it off a piece of recovered steel on its way to be part of a memorial structure. It's welding slag. There is no manganese in thermite. Not much chromium in structural, as opposed to tool steel. Read his paper on Itzamna-as-Jesus, then google crucifiction and you will see how sloppy the fool is.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
Hmm looks like we got an undercover propaganda specialist here trying to pose as a stupid fucking inbred redneck with a 40 I.Q who just sits and watches Fox news with his girlfriend / mother. Fucking idiot.
geno2k3 3 years ago
please show how his work is sloppy?
He got a sample the only way he could, but his tests on the sample are very scientific, and his scientific testing of the dust from 9-11 has been confirmed by 3 other independent labs, which proves thatnhis work is scientific and accurate. Show us his "sloppy work on his "Itzamna-as-Jesus" paper. I did not find anything googling crucifiction he might be wrong but his science is very solid maybe you don't understand the proper scientific method?
lisabob22 3 years ago
Pre-Christian cultures are full of dying and resurrected deities, to include Egypt, Greece, the Inana/Damuzi cult and several Meso-American culture. The "stigmata" in Itzamna's hands are not holes but sources of heat. Laying-on-of-hands is part of every shamanistic cult. Itzamna had a wife and children. Jones has bugger-all.
No forensic scientist in the world is even interested in a sample of unknown provenance. Jones should realize his molten iron is probably slag from a cutting torch.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Slag from a cutting torch does not create a pool of friggin lava under the WTC rubble. Jones does say that some of the dust samples could have possible contained slag from a cutting torch but recently new uncontaminated samples have been recovered in a vacant building close to the WTC that would be untainted by the possibility of slag exposure. The new samples support his findings.
jsaint79 3 years ago
there was no pool of lava. The NASA imaging shows temperatures consistant with a buried Class A fire. A pool of molten metal big enough to retain heat for more than a day would have to be bloody huge, and no pig of cast iron that big was recovered from the site. Don't cite me what a Nazi rag like AFpN and Chris the Fugitive from justice bollyn tells us Loizeaux said. Bollyn lies a lot. There was no uncontaminated site in NYC a day after clean-up started.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Ok, few problems in what you just said.
A. Video, and testimony from workers at the site prove the molten steel.
B. Video of the molten steel exiting the building before collapse. Later to be reported by experts at molten aluminum.
C. If 911 was an inside job do you really think NASA who is practically 100% government funded would release evidence that would be damning to the media??
D. Asbestos in the air but its safe to breath!?
E. Building 7?????
Who was to gain from these attacks?
jsaint79 3 years ago
The fire fighters saw molten metal under WTC6 which could very well be brass. That flows when it is red. Steel does not. The metal pouring out of the building was more likely lead from the batteries at Fuji Bank. Your NASA comment is irrelevant and vague. I didn't say asbestos is safe. Building 7 collapsed progressively because a building fell on it, broke it, and set it on fire.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Molten metal under building 6? Huh? Jet fuel has a burning temp of aprox 1000(F), Brass has a melting point of aprox 1700(F).
Molten lead Video- look up "molten lead" on youtube= silvery liquid not bright.
Molten Steel video- Look up "Thermite"=Bright red,yellow, and orange
I guess if Thermite were to be used on Brass it too would have a bright red, yellow , and orange signature. But that argument defeats the purpose.
jsaint79 3 years ago
What the hell has the temperature of a jet fuel fire have to do with WTC 6? Those were Class A fires, with temps of 1800F not unusual. Tell your crap to someonne who has never sorted out crap in the ruins of a building that burned down. Brass melts in large building fires. Tell someone who has never worked with a plumber that lead will not glow red before it evaporates.
Tell someone with less than a 125 IQ that yours is above room temp.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
LMAO. Left you really need to check your facts. A class "A" fire is described as..
"most common type of fire"
"Class-A fires are commonly used in controlled circumstances, such as a campfire, match or wood burning stove"
Challenge to any reader. Get your wood burning stove as hot as you can and throw a piece of brass in it. See if it turns into lava lol. Most firepokers are made out of brass. I leave mine in there all night.
Less than 125 IQ? am I hurting your feelings? haha
jsaint79 3 years ago
Well, you just proved that you are either a liar or dummer than a sack of balsa wood sledge hammers. Class A fire are fires burning in solid fuels such as wood, paper and fabric. Get a clue, dummy, the first people to cast brass melted it in wood-burning fires. Just need to aerate it a bit.
I now calculate your IQ at 90, because you are sort of literate in one language. Fail.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Wow!! You did some research lol. Good for you! I give you two thumbs up you genius you lol. Now lets look at how this brass was created with wood kelns in extremely controlled environments with constant attention to air flow and situation of the metals.
"Ancient smelting was laborious at best: to keep the fire hot enough, assistants (most likely slaves) would have to pump bellows for long periods"
I don't even know why I am arguing with a guy about building "6" lol.
jsaint79 3 years ago
jsaint79: good idea use facts, funny how that works. Also good to point out that the fires were not hot enough or burn long enough to melt steel or brass either. AT least according to the physical evidence NIST found
lisabob22 3 years ago
Only to dimwits with no fire fighting experience were those fire not hot enough. Class A fuels in office fires can aise the temps to 1800F easily. Add all the nitrates available in WTC 6, you are going to get a hell of a lot more heat, easil;y enough to melt brass. And onlt twoofer morons are saying that ANY steel melted.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
The NIST report does not support your opinion. The evidence supports the fact that the fires did not burn long enough or hot enough to weaken the steel columns. It was not hot enough or long enough to melt brass either, at least acording to the physical evidence NIST investigators reported. Even the goverment "story" doesn't support your ideas. I am not sure where you get them, but the facts did not give them to you
lisabob22 3 years ago
The NASA images showed pockets of fire under the pile that would have been adequete to melt brass. You don't even have to weaken steel much to make it fail due to creep when it is heated unevenly. I once knew a man who wreckaed a train and wiped out a tank battalion by putting coins between railroad tracks and letting the sun tear the tracks loose from the rail bed.Since some columns were destroyed in impact in the towers, it would not have taken mch thermal expansion to over-stress joints.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
steel needs a very hot fire for a very long time to weaken it, the NIST investigation reported that most of the steel columns were exposed to temps up to 250C, a very small % of perimeter columns were exposed to temps up to 600C. The NASA thermal images showed surface temps that were very hot, not what the temps were under the pile, and they did not show "pockets of fire" under the pile. One can assume that temps were hotter in the middle of the pile
lisabob22 3 years ago
what does placing a coin on railroad tracks have to do with the steel of the 3 WTC buildings? The structure below the impact area had no evidence of damage and this area was designed to hold up quite a bit more then the building above it. the columns in the basement held up the whole building, the columns on the 50 floor held up everything above it, with at least a safety factor of 2 for the core columns and 5 for the perimeter columns. But they gave the same resistance as air, weird huh?
lisabob22 3 years ago
My point is the steel expands, shifts around,