Not exactly what I'd call the most impartial group doing the test...i mean you've got the guy who claims to have first thought that the energy produced could cause fusion doing a test that if successful will mean that he got "beat to the punch" on his own idea...no motive to discredit the competition there...plus some might think it odd that the Oak Ridge scientist didn't assist but that probably had as much to do with security clearance as it did with his personal opinions of the testers...
I hate how they try to make it dramatic with the music and the stupid darkness and how these people scribble things and flip papers as if they were actually using them. The dumb list on the board was the worse.
This is not my field but surely the test should be more energy out than in. More out than in, without chemical interaction, is a basic requirement for free energy. Perhaps fusion might not be required but please note my original protecting statement.
I agree that the most interesting part of cold fusion approaches so far (Fleischmann-Pons, sonoluminescence, etc...) isn't so much that fusion is happening, but rather that some form of energy production is happening that we don't understand. Even if we haven't got fusion under control yet, maybe we've got something which could prove very useful in energy production. Somewhat disappointed in the scientific community (in general) for their short-sightedness on this point.
Hhm, I'm kind of interested in this cases of experiments that only show very marginal results, like some of the expirements with psychic phenomena, for instance, of Wilhelm Reich's orgone theory and machines.
On the one hand, the strange fluctuation between the marginal result, and the subsequent failure to reproduce results indicates that the results don't really exist.
Or, perhaps it indicates that our expectations really do influence the course of events.
he said it himself at the end of part 4, didn't trust um and i don't blame him i'ver, this world regime don't wanna see know free energy yet. whether it's true or not that it works, one thing am shore of while there's so much money to be made from the oil that's out there, they'll suck it or all dry before showing what they've got, that's probably a more efficient way of producing clean energy.
Ya, they are just SO blatantly lying about the "results" in these "reproductions"
For the real Cold Fusion explanation go watch this vid: /watch?v=i29oXQHh-U4
These MORONS who disputed Martin Fleischmann did not have a good enough Palladium lattice.. they could have used a tin can for all that matter, and it wouldn't have been anything better than the palladium rod they used!
Not exactly what I'd call the most impartial group doing the test...i mean you've got the guy who claims to have first thought that the energy produced could cause fusion doing a test that if successful will mean that he got "beat to the punch" on his own idea...no motive to discredit the competition there...plus some might think it odd that the Oak Ridge scientist didn't assist but that probably had as much to do with security clearance as it did with his personal opinions of the testers...
possumverde 10 months ago
I hate how they try to make it dramatic with the music and the stupid darkness and how these people scribble things and flip papers as if they were actually using them. The dumb list on the board was the worse.
JBnotthescotch 1 year ago
This is not my field but surely the test should be more energy out than in. More out than in, without chemical interaction, is a basic requirement for free energy. Perhaps fusion might not be required but please note my original protecting statement.
1944woodie 1 year ago
@1944woodie
I agree that the most interesting part of cold fusion approaches so far (Fleischmann-Pons, sonoluminescence, etc...) isn't so much that fusion is happening, but rather that some form of energy production is happening that we don't understand. Even if we haven't got fusion under control yet, maybe we've got something which could prove very useful in energy production. Somewhat disappointed in the scientific community (in general) for their short-sightedness on this point.
blahdelablah 10 months ago 3
Hhm, I'm kind of interested in this cases of experiments that only show very marginal results, like some of the expirements with psychic phenomena, for instance, of Wilhelm Reich's orgone theory and machines.
On the one hand, the strange fluctuation between the marginal result, and the subsequent failure to reproduce results indicates that the results don't really exist.
Or, perhaps it indicates that our expectations really do influence the course of events.
Jcolinsol 1 year ago
Comment removed
GazP2014 1 year ago
he said it himself at the end of part 4, didn't trust um and i don't blame him i'ver, this world regime don't wanna see know free energy yet. whether it's true or not that it works, one thing am shore of while there's so much money to be made from the oil that's out there, they'll suck it or all dry before showing what they've got, that's probably a more efficient way of producing clean energy.
GazP2014 1 year ago 2
@GazP2014
Ya, they are just SO blatantly lying about the "results" in these "reproductions"
For the real Cold Fusion explanation go watch this vid: /watch?v=i29oXQHh-U4
These MORONS who disputed Martin Fleischmann did not have a good enough Palladium lattice.. they could have used a tin can for all that matter, and it wouldn't have been anything better than the palladium rod they used!
melis256 5 months ago
what the fuck have you got against Indians Xytos... at least they contribute something to the scientific community!
AlexownsOMG 1 year ago
Comment removed
AlexownsOMG 1 year ago
dumb indian fags
Xytos 1 year ago