Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (935)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dear uploader, no they are not.

  • Same hit lol

  • boston stop defending ur pathetic bruins literally

  • it wasen't as close u moran

  • Stop crying bitch

  • Nope, literally two different hits. Haha.. Now speaking on the "Type" of hit.. nope still wrong!

  • No because lucic had the puck you idiot

  • LOL. no, they clearly aren't

  • same hit? are you fucking blind?

  • lol if you at least brought up the raymond one we may have a real argument

  • one is a hip check and one is a duck...

  • Hamhuis: 6'1 or 6'2

    Marchand: 5'8 or 5'9

    marchand didnt need 2 bend down hes already a midget

  • youre an idiot, both hits are not even close

  • no where close

  • not evan fucking close

  • To all you fuckers who are complaining about Ballard's and Hamhuis's hits like this, remember a few things. Marchand's cheap hit was a a repeat situation of about 10 seconds earlier, when they collided shoulder to shoulder. Then the second time he took out the knee. This Hamhuis hit is definitely questionable, but remember, clipping penalties are the hardest to judge. The Marchand one was easy because Salo was clearly injured. Grow the fuck up and stop whining like little bitches.

  • if you think thats the same hit, you sir are an idiot

  • @NoClue1472 NO just break your bones.

  • Difference is:

    1. Lucic had puck and Salo didn't

    2. Hamhuis hits him on the hip and Marchand ducks for the knees

    Get your facts straight.

  • Comment removed

  • fuck the canuck crybaby fans and the sedin sisters

  • nice try.

  • @TheIcebruin wow good one, you really got us there

  • the difference is, LUCIC HAD THE PUCK AND SALO DIDNT

  • Don't get the Vancouverites mad, people. They'll want to burn and break things!

  • No sense trying to use common sense talking to a canucks fan, they just don't get it. Exactly the same type of hit.

  • Shanahan's video explains it great. Salo made a clean hit on Marchand 16 seconds prior to the clip, and Marchand was pissed. Salo ignored Marchand punching him. When going for the puck, Marchand made a predatory hit. He was the aggressor in the play.

    The difference between THIS and that, is that THIS was a textbook hipcheck. Hamhuis was on the defensive end.

    Besides, Hamhuis never played after this hit. Stop whining, anti-Canucks fans. You got what you wanted.

  • Yeah they're the same hit if you know next to nothing about the game.

  • Yep we are dirty we are intimidating we have the cup we have tough players with talent. Thats how our scouts and GM and president Neely Role. Until the league realizes you need TOUGH talented people all these little mama's boys can go play in the Swedish Elite League. I love how the Bruins play dirty or not. Like the Broadstreet Bullies( my 2nd favorite team, and like the big bad bruins of the late 70s and early 80s. You want to do something about it change your team paradigm.

  • youre a fucking idiot if you CANT see theyre the same.. in both hits they contact the exact same part of the leg. un fucking real how biased people are against the bruins lol

  • @Saladmeister Though im a canucsk fan its not the same at all, regardless of which team it is.

    If you pause the Video at about 0:15 you will see Hamhuis`s side/back making contact with Lucic`s thigh/groin area then hanhuis uses his strength to flip horton.

    In Marchands Clip, Salo isnt facing him, its from behind, marchands back makes contact at around the knee cap area and he doesnt use any strength to push him up and over he basicly table tops him, and salos momentum carries him over top

  • only a boston fan could be dumb enough not to see the difference

  • they are identical hits. only reason hamhuis didnt get suspended was because lucic didnt bitch and cry like salo

  • @19837robbie HAHAHA you sir, are a dumb fuck

  • only a bruins fan wouldn't be able to tell the difference

  • op; You clearly dont know the difference between a hip check and true clipping ie:taking a guys legs out.

  • You gotta be a fukimg moron if u think those two hits are the same

  • Boston faggots are the worst winners in history. They have the cup and they're still crying like fucking cunts over Vancouver.

  • You are a dumb ass

    "dear NHL" lool and a fagg too

  • Comment removed

  • GO MARCHAND FUCK THE CANUCKS!!!!

  • Americans are retards...

  • ....the ironing is delicious

  • Hamuis above the knees = clean

    Marchand below the knees = dirty

    QQ more bitch

  • Im bruins all the way, but Marchands hit was ruled "illegal" as he hit salo across the knees, a check like that isn't ment to go that far down, Hamhuis hit Lucic just over the knees, it might be because of his height that it hit the knees or something but there is a clear difference...

  • what a joke. wake up boston fans

  • @crosbysucksable Lol wtf are you talkinking about boston is the dirtiest team in the league

  • they deff aren't the same hit

  • not sticking up for the canadian team im standing up for the PROPER team that is in fact the cup winners....maybe if wancouver stops diving whining and cheap shotting they will be more respected in the league... GOOD HJIT MARCHAND POOR HIT HAMHUIS

  • @crosbysucksable diving, whining and cheap shotting? wow.. what hockey are you watching? Chara on Pacioretty. Marchand on Salo. Lucic on Ryan Miller. And diving?  When was the last Vancouver diving penalty? 2007? Unbelievable... think before you type and hit post... ugh.

  • @kadel300 lol big difference between diving and diving penalty moron, you think before you post moron

  • @kadel300 Just because there wasn't a penalty called doesn't mean it wasn't a dive. Perfect example is the game where Lucic and Burrows were paired up on the faceoff. Burrows tripped himself and they both got penalties. The marchand and Lucic hits you're talking about are both controversial, but the Chara hit was NOT a cheap shot. It was a freak thing, more so the spot on the rink than the hit itself. At most it was a bit late.

  • @crosbysucksable Sounds like you are mad. What team are you rooting for? The Coilers? Have fun with first pick ;)

  • salo goes to bump marchand off the puck....got levelled for it GOOD HIT BRAD GOOD HIT, hamhuis waits til lucic dumps and goes to chase and does it.....BAD HIT....im canadian and i have to say wancouver (yes i said WANcouver) is the biggest disgrace to hockey canada....riots, whining, dirty playing, diving...bunches of cry baby punks and as a canadian i will be the first to admit boston deserved and wanted that cup more....

  • @crosbysucksable You're fucked in the head... lemme guess, you're probably a leafs fan

  • @crosbysucksable Salo wasnt even going for Marchand. He was going for the puck. Marchand saw his chance and he took it. Low life scum. He should be banned from the NHL for life. Are you frikkin serious? Diving? When was the last Vancouver dive or diving penalty? Honestly. Some Canuck fans can be whiny, and yes i can see why you hate Burrows and Lapierre. Every team has players that everyone else hates. But get your facts straight... the least injured, dirtiest team won the cup. Not deserved.

  • SuperNinjaWalrus, you're a moron. You obviously didn't watch the video. The puck was actually touching Marchand's stick when the check happened. Marchand made 0 attempt to check Salo. Salo was the aggressor and got dumped for it. Those checks are the exact same check in the exact same spot on the body.

  • @pureallstar3482 SuperNinjaWalrus is the moron? Read what you just wrote...

  • hamhuis was hip on hip

  • read the description...you guys won, take it. hamhuis hit lucic after he dumped the puck in, marchand took out salo not around the puck at all, and gave salo no time to react to the play. and sorry salo threw his stick "like a pouting little girl" he had just been given a fuckin concusion. your an idiot

  • are you kidding hamhuis did a perfect hip check to eliminate lucic from the puck, salo didnt even have the puck

  • Lucic had the puck, Salo never came close to touching it.

  • @xdancinrickx he didn't go on his knees till salos weight forced him to go down

  • Hamuis threw a check leading with hip. Tiny Marchand just bends over and takes out Salo's legs from under him. Not to mention that Salo never even got to the puck before being submarined. It's great to have little cheap rats in the game though, because now we will all get to watch win he inevitably gets his stupid face filled in.

  • *hamhius

  • Salo stayed on his feet, Marchand dropped a knee to the ice....dumb motherfuckers, that's the difference

  • No they aren't the same hit.

    -NHL

  • the only difference is the fact that marchand is quite a bit shorter so when he goes low, it's lower than hamhuis. not saying it shouldn't have been a penalty on him, but it doesn't make him dirty. he just needs to learn how to use his body.

  • No they aren't the same hits.

  • Funny how Marchand does the same hit tonight vs the Habs...will he ever learn to use his brain? Dirtiest ray in the NHL. Should learn to play like a man.

  • @tyciamoya Idk man, Steve Ott and Sean Avery may be the dirtiest players in the NHL.

  • @bruinsbest

    Boston has riots too ya hippocrite.

  • Fuck Boston.

  • @zerodegreez YES

  • Main difference is that Lucic had the puck and Hamhuis went to hit him. Marchand on the other hand had the puck and to avoid getting hit takes out the players knees. Point is Marchand should have just took the hit not ducked under it. Both are very low hits though I agree. But there is a difference when you are going after a guy with the puck.

  • basically the same hit, people just like to bitch and moan about everything

  • @MyNameIsDuffmarn hamhuis went hip on hip marchand went way below the waist watch it again before you put ur fucking foot in ur mouth

  • @mrbrandonmacdonald maybe you should watch it again

  • dumb cunt, boston is sucking tons of balls now. horton is out with a concussion. how does it feel bitch

  • @zejono to bad were in second place

  • @zejono fine because its the regular season. were in the playoffs and winning our division again. so go cry and bitch when Chicago or Detroit smokes u and complain that there dirty or hit too much or that the refs dont fall for all the canucks diving, flopping around and acting hurt.

  • @zejono Just fine.. hows it feel to lose in two game 7s and destroy your city twice?

  • @BruinsBest lol you lost to the rangers twice now. hopefully they take your dirty team out of the playoffs

  • Same thing. How do you know Marchand wanted to injure Salo. You dumb canadian

  • @TheElephantsReer5 hahaah bitchass nigga. im an american. canada invented hockey and deserve respect. And who has the worldwide reputation of being dumb? us. fucking punk

  • @TheElephantsReer5 They came together 15 seconds ago and Marchand was so pissed to give Salo a gloved punch. They came together again. Marchand could have easily cleared the puck down the ice and submarined Salo

  • Marchand was intent to injure big difference learn ur rules before u make a stupid video.

  • Are you fucking retarded did you see how low Marchand went on Salo? And Salo suffered of a concussion. And if this were to be a clean hip check it would have to be above the knees and if it were to be illegal it would be a hit on or below the knees and Salo wasn't even moving fast and Marchand is all like "Derp i'm going to injure him" Bruins are so dirty at hockey.

  • Hamhuis made a legal "hockeyplay" while Ratfuck Marchand did not...... Only a Bruin fan can't see the difference because they are stupid........

  • if you kept the clip going of salo, you'll see that salo does not roll around for 30 seconds to make sure he gets the call, he throws his stick out of frustration and gets up. townie5lax, this is a stupid comparison.

  • by the book hipcheck vs. pussy ducking. excellent comparison

  • Comment removed

  • DUMBEST. FUCKING. COMPARISON. EVER.

  • Hamuis had nice hipcheck.

    Marchand had a dirty clip. The end.

  • Dear Townie5lax. No, these aren't the same hit.

  • dan hamhuis hit him at the groin/top of the leg area, since marchand hit salo at knee level it is considered clipping, also since a shoulder check wasnt appropriate for this situation, hammy didnt get anyhting

  • Please hold your periods bruins fans, no need to bitch about what has been done and is over with...

  • Too bad Marchand didnt fucking wreck Salos shitty career.

  • @xKaninen salo has played over 700 games in the nhl, and over 100+/-, I dont think that's a shitty career, and even if it was, why would you hope for a career ending injury?

  • No you fucking retard. Mardick should of played the puck instead of being a douche like he is

  • You answered your own question.

    Hamhuis hit from the front. Marchand from the back.

    Therefore the hits are not the same. Goof.

  • difference is lucic had the puck = legal hit and in salos instance he did not have the puck = illegal hit

  • The difference between these two hits aside from one being dirty n one being clean r the ppl Marchand is a rat who has no class at all!! Hamhuis is amazing and isnt a lil bitch!! And If you think the hits are the same wouldn't they have done something to hamhuis... Clearly there's a flaw in your logic...

  • yeah marchands is completely illegal. this is typical bruins fans trying to bitch about how they didnt get one call, you get the rest so suck it up you pansies

  • marchand went to one knee and hit salo way to low. hamhuis' hit was clean.

  • ummm u stupid or somthin because there is 2 different rules in both plays and 2 people who are incharge of suspensions

  • Wow, can't believe people are still fighting about this ..

  • How can one person be so ignorant as to say these hits are the same? 1) Hamhuis is COMMITTED to the check on Lucic and hits him well within arm + stick length after the pucked is released. 2) Hamhuis' hit is at high speed whereas the Marchand/Salo is almost at a toddler sprint. 3) Hamhuis' bend of the leg was against the natural bend because he's cutting in for the hit. Marchand ducked down low because that's his style, to take others out and there was no play for the puck

  • Marchand's should not be a penalty because he clearly (in slow mo) contacted thigh not knee. Hamhuis' should be a penalty as you can see he even uses his hand on the knee to flip him worse. All the puck and direction crap you people mention has nothing to do with the clipping rule, go read it.

  • @BootlegFightVideo Hahaha, you've probably never played a game of hockey in your life, its cute that you dont know the difference between a hip check and a clip though, keep commenting on shit you have no idea about :D

  • @BootlegFightVideo wow, its unbelievable how blind people are, YOU SAID YOU WATCHED IT IN SLOW MOTION!! so you shouldve noticed, the difference is that lucic has the puck! salo was going into the corner to get the puck, and wasnt even making the motion to lay a shot on marchand, jesus christ ur telling people to read? how bout u read up on what a hip check is, and chek out the history of it, everybody uses their body to push the knees over the head, including the hand

  • @nick5448 Having the puck has nothing to do with clipping. If a guy is about to hit you has nothing to do with clipping. Read the rule. Marchand delivered a hip check since it was ABOVE THE KNEE.

    a player drops o a near-crouching stance and swings his hips toward an opposing player, sending the opponent off balance, often falling to the ice. Mostly done up against the boards. A hit at or below the knees is considered an infraction in the National Hockey League, and called "clipping".

  • they aren't . Marchand could have played the puck but decided to go after salo instead. Hamhuis hit Lucic right after he dumpped the puck in

  • well marchand was skating forward which makes it a low hit go shoulder to shoulder. brad is a pussy that's y he went low. now I'm not a vancouver fan I actually hate that team but hamuis was skating backwards closed the gap and lead with his hips that's what we canadians would call a hipcheck. so from now on when u r going to complain about a hit like that ask your self.... what way what he skating forwards or backwards forwards low will always be a penalty make sure u know the rules

  • this is exaclty wat I thought man ;)

  • @Kplayz shut the fuck up Kplayz

  • @MCDavisFTW haha, you weak ass bitch

  • @Kplayz you know you can smack mine you punk white ass think you're a real nigga.

  • @MCDavisFTW lol I know you David. You gonna burn, you gonna buuuuuuuuurn!!! ;)

  • @Kplayz hahaha jpensais pas tu me reconnaitrais :P

  • the difference is lucic isnt a huge pussy so they didnt call anything

  • There is a difference. One is hockey play, the other is an attempt to injure. But Boston fans won't be happy until one of their players' kills a Canuck on the ice, and of course they'll feel it won't deserve a penalty.

  • They were both clipping but penalties tend to be lax in playoffs for god knows what reason (by which I mean they should either be lax all the time or called all the time).

  • Lou stole two games two retard

  • @chriscccc11 Why are you calling him a retard when you don't even know how to use the reply function and are using the wrong form of 'too'?

  • Does it fucking matter if they're the same hit? Hamhuis was done for the series after that hit, I suspect that was enough discipline enough. Losing Hamhuis was a turning point in this series. You could even argue that it cost them the series. Get over it.

  • @Tombstone1959 hahah thats awsome and so true

  • @Tombstone1959 Your moms favorite are the nuts!!!

  • @NBertuzzi Your favorite is the fruits...you've already been "Burtuzzied", you bore me.

    NEXT!!!

  • @Tombstone1959 I bore you lol aka your scared of me. I strike fear in your heart. Your mom started eating too many nuts. I got a little angry cause she eating nuts for free so I had to bertuzzi her with my penis. I hope you not mad.

  • @NBertuzzi LMAO @ scared...what are you going to beat me up. You have a hard enough time beating your "dumb brother" on your traditional Friday night "White Knuckle Chuckle" Come at me tough guy...LOL

  • @Tombstone1959 Ur intimidated by me Tombstone. When you saw my reply you started trembling in you high heels. Your like "no not Nbertuzzi again he owned me n my moms really badly last time". Your scared of getting humiliated by my first world comebacks while your third world comebacks be needing some donations.

  • @NBertuzzi You're a legend...in your own mind!

    I am not afraid of anyone who is too "chicken-shit" to even make his home page available. You're the one scared shit-stain!

  • @Tombstone1959 Look at you trying to check out my home page like the creeper that you are. Everyone should not display their homepage cause of creepers like you. You got so many pedophillic tendency you need help. Youtube is not safe with Tombstone free to roam youtube pages.

  • @NBertuzzi Hide behind your excuses chicken-shit...it is YOU who is afraid!!!

  • @Tombstone1959 Tombestone im guessing the 1959 stands for your birth year or the number of dicks you've sucked or both. Meaning you are a gay pedophilic 53 year old person roaming around youtube looking for little boys to prey on. You sir are a fucking loser and you seriously need to re-access your life goals.

  • Would you rather get hit in the hip (Hamhuis), or the knee and have a high chance of a lower body injury. Bostons hit was also a retalliation hit, making it even worse. P.S. I hate vancouver (Go Flames!)

  • i love how people say the bruins are dirty players when alex burrows of the cannucks bit one of the bruins players when the ref wasn't looking, and he also hit thomas in the back of the leg with his stick which prompted a brawl... and not to mention the open ice headshot to horton in the playoffs.. yeah they're a real classy bunch there.. way to call the kettle black.. i wouldn't even mention it if they didn't run their mouths.. bruins all the way!

  • @FunnyEdits1 Even though a bruins player Savard bit Carcillo a while back lol But you don't see flyers fans bitching about that constantly.

  • Hamhuis threw a hip heck, clean legal hockey hit, and not low unlike that rats clipping cheap shot

  • I like how the Bruins can't take a clean hit and swarm Hamhuis when he is injured. Pathetic

  • Marchand hit = ILLEGAL! blindside. he ducked at the last minute and went WAY too low. It is not the time or place for a hip check and his was fully intending to injure. Marchand is one of the dirtiest hockey players and would intend to injure... he had no intent on going for the puck. If you watch earlier in the play, marchand was giving salo quite a few shots to the head. i am pretty sure he wanted to hurt salo... but why though? salo is a classy veteran and has earned his name in the league.

  • Hamhuis hit = LEGAL! hip to hip. definitely NOT at the knee level or close to marchand's level. Lucic had plenty of time to see him coming. it is a perfectly valid hockey play that occurs all the time. No intent to injure. Dan is one of the most genuine hockey players and wouldn't intend to injure.

  • are you high? it was shoulder to knee on lucic whose a top liner for the B's and can out play any canuck....weird they also injured horton...but its kk we won the cup!!!

  • "Ironing is delicious" brooms fans.

  • nothing similar at all about the hit. marchand is cheap. bruins are dirty. just like their fans

  • remember that time we lossed against vancover and destroyed or city? me either. sorry whose ignorant now?

  • @Ranger1877 hey ranger do you know why you don't have outside viewing of the games in Boston? 3 deaths the last time it was done.

  • Just another broons fan who knows nothing about hockey embarrassing himself... these two hits are nothing alike. Ones a hockey play the other is a cowardly illegal move. End of discussion

  • @convotutor Are you kidding? I don't even like the Bruins but Bruins' fans know more about hockey on average than Canucks fans. Hockey isn't about throwing a fit, diving, finger-biting, having riots in the streets, etc. And what the hell are the "Broons"? And on the note of embarrassing yourself...you sir cannot punctuate, spell, or use proper grammar. Both of these plays are very much the same. I don't know anyone who wouldn't love Marchand if he was on their team-he's that kind of guy.

  • well said

    

  • @ASteveVaiFan Hell ya, good man. Bruins all day. Canucks fans don't know shit...

  • @ASteveVaiFan Check out the video " the ironing is delicious" and you will see that Boston is guilty of everything you just mentioned!

  • @BeastmodeKes Oh!!! Jon Stewart said so it "must" be true!

  • @Tombstone1959 Video evidence doesn't lie!

  • @BeastmodeKes I agree with you...video evidence does not lie. I will refer you to "Ballard destroys Mcginn" & "Mason Raymond rocks Marchand"

  • @Tombstone1959 Raymonds hit was retaliation for Marchand on Sedin, which was the same fucking hit. Ballard's hit was a HIP CHECK and is LEGAL in the nhl. Stop defending this puke, he's dirty and everybody know's it. Why else was he suspended 5 games? in less then two season's he's been suspended three times!

  • First one was a hip check the second one was head on

  • whoever posted this video is dumb as shit and knows nothing about hockey.

  • remember when you booed the national anthem or you went 6 on 1 on a guy

  • Comment removed

  • the difference is hamuis isnt a know goon but marchand is...................... when marchand hits he wants to injure............... when hamuis hits he does it so he can get the puck

  • @j5pats619

    You talk about bad fans up in Canada? I'd like to direct you to this exact same hit. Boston fans cheer loudly when Salo goes down, and continue to cheer when he's laying on the ice. Salo gets up, the fans boo him. Where im from people have respect for others and would cheer when Salo got up.

  • No. Marchand didnt cone in backwards like Hamhuis did. Marchand was trying to deceive salo iinto thinking it would be shoulder to shoulder then blamo

  • Marchand didn't get suspended because of the hit, he got suspended because of his intent to injure. Apparently he thought Salo was coming at him at full speed and was gonna knock his head off(which he wasn't, it's Sami freakin Salo.) SO instead of embracing himself for the hit or getting out of the way, he goes low and flips him over. That's intent to injure and if you Bruins fans don't think so, then you're just ignorant. Salo didn't even have the puck to begin with, like Lucic did in this clip

  • @gameover221 <<< stills pretends he knows what everyone is doing & everyone is thinking. If you want to know the truth about something going on in the NHL, this 18 year old knows it all, just ask him!!!

    I am sure he even "thinks" he's a player, he sure puts posts up on youtube like he was sitting on the bench watching every play go down!

  • @Tombstone1959 <<< Doesn't have an argument against what the other guy said so he attacks him as a person.

    I'm sure he even "thinks" he's clever and people will agree with him.

  • @TheRenegadeSniper lol thanks dude, this guy attacks me on every video and doesn`t even address the point...