Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
The homosexual agenda is not good for anyone, including those who consider themselves "gay".
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfuly framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
Faggot don't need marriage.... their 'relationships' never last longer than a year, even when married. They get tired of their partners very quickly, because they lack any emotional bond. They care mostly about sex. And one you've fucked your butt-buddy till his anus is shriveled, crusty and stretched to the point where it can fit a melon, they need a new partner. It is a sad way of life.
this is the dumbest video ive ever seen u didnt prove anything and u hav no idea wat ur saying so dont talk. u call us "bible freaks" I think ur a freak so go cry to u two daddies cause u hav no idea wat ur talking about
102 is about setting the boundries , bounderis that we as humans must live in as a society which God, thee God of abraham isaac and jacob set for us to live by. if one were to say its ok in my belief to slaughter children who then is to say that he cannot, well bnoundries does that for us we would not tollerrate such behavior right? we all must live in boundries and the moral boundry is men must not lie with men and woman must not lie with woman this behavior must be set for us to live in ,
Prop 102 is not about religion... its simply stating that a marriage is a union of one man and one woman... Period. it says nothing about Jesus and the Bible. And how could Prop 102 be "tearing apart families"? Butt sex doesn't make babies, and to be honest I would feel REALLY sorry for a kid who is adopted by a gay or lesbian couple. Just imagine having two daddies and no mommy or two mommies but no daddy. Kids need a male AND female figure in their lives. Its a vitally necessary balance.
One person huh? so you think I am the ONLY person who believes in this? And alot of people are accusing us of hate. I don't hate gay people This is my view on homosexuality. As you know EVERYONE has their own set of issues. some people have problems with drugs some have problems with alcohol, some people are addicted to sex. I think that nobody is meant to be gay, they just have problems with their sexual identity. but instead of overcoming their their problem they are just being overtaken by it
OK, why not find me some scientific evidence, and do a video response? Aren't we trying to move the United States as a whole away from discrimination? Hey we were making progress, and then now this comes up, and now we are digging ourselves back into the hole. Gay marriage is legal in Europe and it is not ruining the sanctity of marriage or whatever. With the divorce rates so high, especially in those celebrities that your kids look up to, there really is no sanctity anyway!
Yeah I agree on that, people are really ruining the sanctity of marriage with the high divorce rate... but do we have to degrade it even more by legalizing gay marriage? We'd be going out of the frying pan and into the fire so to speak. Thats SIMILAR to saying "hey, we're already doing cocaine... might as well do meth".
I would have loved to grow up without a woman in the house! :3 And most families are single parents with dead or restraining orders on the other parents, so gay marriage wont effect having "no mommy or daddy" because it already exists. Gay marriage will just allow more families with two parents.
well thats unfortunate for those children who had to deal with a loss or a divorce. I sincerely feel bad for them, thats tough, it is hard on kids. But we can prevent even more pain to children by not giving permission for gay couples to adopt them.
Ok think about it. Every kid wants to live in a normal family. At first, a kid may see two daddies as being normal but as he grows up he becomes confused. Most kids would want to have a mom (dad) as well as a dad (mom). when A child's parent dies when they are at an early age, they start to ask their other living parent why this happened, and they talk about how they wish they had a mom or dad. kids with gay parents will long to have a parent a mom or dad instead of two moms or two dads
No they wont. I was once a kid, and I know what they think. And there is no "normal" to a family because a family has no requirements. One person can be a family, and it's still normal. It's not like a guy has to have a wife a son and a daughter to be considered a family. I kid will not get confused because when I grew up, all the kids in kindergarten with me already knew what gay was, and what is so confusing about love?
Well yeah thats a duh. Of course they know what homosexual means. But recognizing that as a normal functional family real distorts and confuses their view on family.
Then you have never experimented, and if you did, you would have know that kids do things with both boys and girls and seeing adults doing the same shouldn't confuse them. And who cares if kids will get confused? They will get confused about EVERYTHING. That is why parents talk to their kids, and then they wont be confused anymore because they would know.
If you've ever tried butt sex, well. I don't know what gender you are, but men have prostates that can only be stimulated through the butt and it's like a g-spot on females. Why would that be put there if we weren't meant to be gay by god? Or did he just do that so we would get morning wood?
There is a simple fix to all this fuss. Remove the word marriage entirely. Call it a Union of Trust. Our problem is although we have separation of church and state, religious influences are still abundant in our laws. The government does not gauge if we have sex on our honeymoons, it does not gauge if you actually LOVE the person. It is merely a form to designate combination of assets and trust of decisions of one another. And if it's marriage they want, they can have it in a church, all done..
Stop lying and distorting the truth about the proposition. The prop only defines marriage. None of that other stuff. And for those of you uninformed claiming you already voted no on this, you didn't!...prop 107 from before included much more than a definition. Read up next time before you make yourself look stupid. :) How many of you reading this got here from a gay marriage. None? You seem surprised. Let nature speak for itself.
We in California will stand strong with Arizona. Please keep fighting. I donated $102 to No on Prop 102. I will mobilize all of my friends, both straight and gay, in Arizona to vote No on Prop 102.
We will prevail and with this victory will come progress.
Just as you can ONLY put any MALE part into a FEMALE part and get it to function properly, so shall we with the institution that is MARRIAGE. Anyone who can't see the obvious pureand accurate logic in that is just retarded... or gay LOL!
That is not the main reason of why I think that people should vote yes or no on 102. The main reason I am trying to get at would be that people are letting religion dictate how they should vote, if you have watched my whole video, and that how religion should not interfere with our government.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
While religion has a role in it, PURE LOGIC in the universe also tells us how WRONG homosexuality is. Only disturbed and quite RETARDED human beings practice homosexuality. Ignorant people would allow gay marriage or adoption.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Opinions are one thing. You kow how that goes, they are like assholes and everyone's got one! But pure LOGIC prevails on this one. Only those with MISGUIDED logic believe in same sex marriage, gay adoption, etc etc etc.
What logic are you using? Logic should tell that what is right for one group is good for the other because both are equal. Religion and ignorance says otherwise. Legally speaking, denying one group the same rights as another is discrimination. It is unjust removal of rights based on a bias. No where does it say that marriage is for procreation, which is where your logic comes from. People procreate without marriage all the time. Thus, your opinion is void of logic.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"What logic are you using?" Uh, PURE logic. How can you argue about nature? Humans were created MALE and FEMALE! DUH! Those who don't understand how that works, are called R-E-T-A-R-D-S! Why do these retards need to get married anyway? It's a UNION between and man and a woman. A UNION where to different parts can be joined. You can NOT join two penises or two vaginas. Damn! My PURE LOGIC is undeniable!
If Marriage was all about mating, then marriages should be abolished for those not mating. Makes sense then, see by your terns if to individuals are not mating then they are not following nature. Paysonbadboy, why don't you join the rest of us in the 21st Century where we have moved beyond paleolithic definitions and into the realm of understanding. Oh, I guess I shouldn't also mention the homosexual tendencies present in both flora and fauna either.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Move into the 21st Century? Where being a RETARD is commended? Dude. Try as you must, but it is so OBVIOUS that Penis was made for Vagina, Vagina made for Penis. I mean, Damn, is that that hard for RETARDS to understand? MALE + FEMALE is the ONLY WAY. Unless you are a RETARD. Period. Case closed. I win because I know how my sex organ works.
Again, idiot... marriage has NOTHING to do with mating. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Why? Because two people can procreate with or without marriage. They do it all the time. Marriage is about commitment to another human being. You're just homophobic and too stubborn to admit it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Marriage began as a sacred union between a MAN and a WOMAN. Because, after all, that is actually the only REAL way that we can mate. OPPOSITE SEXES! Only RETARDS get that SIMPLE FACT messed up, and now they want to turn marriage into an abortion by allowing the same sexes to marry? Why not just create a UNION FOR RETARDS pact or something instead? Same sex can't mate anyway. So it's pointless. Oh, unless you are a RETARD and think you are mating... shit! :p
Sorry to say this 'paysonbadboy', but you're the only retard in the room. And sadly, that in itself is an insult to all those developmentally disabled people out there. Keep living in your ignorant little world, while the rest of us shed the cromagnon-man like ways of the past.
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexuality and homosexuality. Even non-religious people know this.
The homosexual agenda is not good for anyone, including those who consider themselves "gay".
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have successfuly framed themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
Faggot don't need marriage.... their 'relationships' never last longer than a year, even when married. They get tired of their partners very quickly, because they lack any emotional bond. They care mostly about sex. And one you've fucked your butt-buddy till his anus is shriveled, crusty and stretched to the point where it can fit a melon, they need a new partner. It is a sad way of life.
PeopleSquasher 6 months ago
this is the dumbest video ive ever seen u didnt prove anything and u hav no idea wat ur saying so dont talk. u call us "bible freaks" I think ur a freak so go cry to u two daddies cause u hav no idea wat ur talking about
vosem94 2 years ago
102 is about setting the boundries , bounderis that we as humans must live in as a society which God, thee God of abraham isaac and jacob set for us to live by. if one were to say its ok in my belief to slaughter children who then is to say that he cannot, well bnoundries does that for us we would not tollerrate such behavior right? we all must live in boundries and the moral boundry is men must not lie with men and woman must not lie with woman this behavior must be set for us to live in ,
blueblud281 3 years ago
Boundaries set by mormons?
dontwalkhand 3 years ago
Prop 102 is not about religion... its simply stating that a marriage is a union of one man and one woman... Period. it says nothing about Jesus and the Bible. And how could Prop 102 be "tearing apart families"? Butt sex doesn't make babies, and to be honest I would feel REALLY sorry for a kid who is adopted by a gay or lesbian couple. Just imagine having two daddies and no mommy or two mommies but no daddy. Kids need a male AND female figure in their lives. Its a vitally necessary balance.
BDNt12 3 years ago
It is a civil rights issue, basically you are forcing people to believe your way. Sorry but the world does not revolve around one person's beliefs.
dontwalkhand 3 years ago
One person huh? so you think I am the ONLY person who believes in this? And alot of people are accusing us of hate. I don't hate gay people This is my view on homosexuality. As you know EVERYONE has their own set of issues. some people have problems with drugs some have problems with alcohol, some people are addicted to sex. I think that nobody is meant to be gay, they just have problems with their sexual identity. but instead of overcoming their their problem they are just being overtaken by it
BDNt12 3 years ago
OK, why not find me some scientific evidence, and do a video response? Aren't we trying to move the United States as a whole away from discrimination? Hey we were making progress, and then now this comes up, and now we are digging ourselves back into the hole. Gay marriage is legal in Europe and it is not ruining the sanctity of marriage or whatever. With the divorce rates so high, especially in those celebrities that your kids look up to, there really is no sanctity anyway!
dontwalkhand 3 years ago
Yeah I agree on that, people are really ruining the sanctity of marriage with the high divorce rate... but do we have to degrade it even more by legalizing gay marriage? We'd be going out of the frying pan and into the fire so to speak. Thats SIMILAR to saying "hey, we're already doing cocaine... might as well do meth".
BDNt12 3 years ago
I would have loved to grow up without a woman in the house! :3 And most families are single parents with dead or restraining orders on the other parents, so gay marriage wont effect having "no mommy or daddy" because it already exists. Gay marriage will just allow more families with two parents.
BleedingNeedles 3 years ago
well thats unfortunate for those children who had to deal with a loss or a divorce. I sincerely feel bad for them, thats tough, it is hard on kids. But we can prevent even more pain to children by not giving permission for gay couples to adopt them.
Oh and by the way, PROP 102 PASSED!!!!!! YEAH!!!!
BDNt12 3 years ago
Who said they even ever knew the other parent? There is no prof of both genders being needed.
BleedingNeedles 3 years ago
Ok think about it. Every kid wants to live in a normal family. At first, a kid may see two daddies as being normal but as he grows up he becomes confused. Most kids would want to have a mom (dad) as well as a dad (mom). when A child's parent dies when they are at an early age, they start to ask their other living parent why this happened, and they talk about how they wish they had a mom or dad. kids with gay parents will long to have a parent a mom or dad instead of two moms or two dads
BDNt12 3 years ago
No they wont. I was once a kid, and I know what they think. And there is no "normal" to a family because a family has no requirements. One person can be a family, and it's still normal. It's not like a guy has to have a wife a son and a daughter to be considered a family. I kid will not get confused because when I grew up, all the kids in kindergarten with me already knew what gay was, and what is so confusing about love?
BleedingNeedles 3 years ago
Well yeah thats a duh. Of course they know what homosexual means. But recognizing that as a normal functional family real distorts and confuses their view on family.
BDNt12 3 years ago
Then you have never experimented, and if you did, you would have know that kids do things with both boys and girls and seeing adults doing the same shouldn't confuse them. And who cares if kids will get confused? They will get confused about EVERYTHING. That is why parents talk to their kids, and then they wont be confused anymore because they would know.
BleedingNeedles 3 years ago
But thie thing is, there isn't sense to homosexuality, forgive me for saying that.
BDNt12 3 years ago
Then how are we to prevent over-population?
BleedingNeedles 3 years ago
Condums and birth control! Not butt sex.
BDNt12 3 years ago
If you've ever tried butt sex, well. I don't know what gender you are, but men have prostates that can only be stimulated through the butt and it's like a g-spot on females. Why would that be put there if we weren't meant to be gay by god? Or did he just do that so we would get morning wood?
BleedingNeedles 3 years ago
You liked the fact that Arizonans have now legalized discrimination? Why not just send them to the back of Valley Metro buses now??
dontwalkhand 3 years ago
Yes, he likes it. I bet he's a sadist. Thriving off of other peoples pains. :(
BleedingNeedles 3 years ago
Argh,
my whole family voted NO.
we lost.
mojomayes 3 years ago
passing discrimination eases pain?
idaman12345 2 years ago
so instead of a kid goign to a family that will love him youd rather see him in a foster home
and btw prop 102 was about religion
idaman12345 2 years ago
There is a simple fix to all this fuss. Remove the word marriage entirely. Call it a Union of Trust. Our problem is although we have separation of church and state, religious influences are still abundant in our laws. The government does not gauge if we have sex on our honeymoons, it does not gauge if you actually LOVE the person. It is merely a form to designate combination of assets and trust of decisions of one another. And if it's marriage they want, they can have it in a church, all done..
lonerayven 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Screw that I'm voting yes
BDNt12 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Amen brother!
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
Screw you!
>>> NO WAY on 102!
mchatow 3 years ago
homophobe, if someones loves another person, they should marry them, its a PERSONAL thing. stop spraying your illigoical, anti life BULLSHIT
Xcokedav096 3 years ago 3
America is Soooooooo UPTIGHT, Geeeez!
Gay marriage is LEGAL in Canada & England & life goes on as usual...
Marriage amendments are SOOOOO Yesterday!
...VOTE 'NO' on 8 in CA!
...VOTE 'NO' on 102 in AZ!
...VOTE for OBAMA in ALL States!
mchatow 3 years ago 2
Stop lying and distorting the truth about the proposition. The prop only defines marriage. None of that other stuff. And for those of you uninformed claiming you already voted no on this, you didn't!...prop 107 from before included much more than a definition. Read up next time before you make yourself look stupid. :) How many of you reading this got here from a gay marriage. None? You seem surprised. Let nature speak for itself.
***YES on prop 102***
ntaolxw7 3 years ago
Gay marriage is LEGAL in Canada & England & life goes on as usual...
Marriage amendments are SOOOOO Yesterday!
...VOTE 'NO' on 8 in CA!
...VOTE 'NO' on 102 in AZ!
...VOTE for OBAMA in ALL States!
mchatow 3 years ago 2
We in California will stand strong with Arizona. Please keep fighting. I donated $102 to No on Prop 102. I will mobilize all of my friends, both straight and gay, in Arizona to vote No on Prop 102.
We will prevail and with this victory will come progress.
- Vote NO on Prop 102 in AZ
- Vote NO on Prop 8 in CA
liebo76 3 years ago 10
Just as you can ONLY put any MALE part into a FEMALE part and get it to function properly, so shall we with the institution that is MARRIAGE. Anyone who can't see the obvious pureand accurate logic in that is just retarded... or gay LOL!
YES on Prop 102 all the way!
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
That is not the main reason of why I think that people should vote yes or no on 102. The main reason I am trying to get at would be that people are letting religion dictate how they should vote, if you have watched my whole video, and that how religion should not interfere with our government.
dontwalkhand 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
While religion has a role in it, PURE LOGIC in the universe also tells us how WRONG homosexuality is. Only disturbed and quite RETARDED human beings practice homosexuality. Ignorant people would allow gay marriage or adoption.
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
So why should everyone believe your opinion? I guess it makes you happy to stifle other people's happiness.
dontwalkhand 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Opinions are one thing. You kow how that goes, they are like assholes and everyone's got one! But pure LOGIC prevails on this one. Only those with MISGUIDED logic believe in same sex marriage, gay adoption, etc etc etc.
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
Did you miss the fact that people do not just go out one day and choose to be gay? That is like saying you can choose what parents you are born with!
dontwalkhand 3 years ago
What logic are you using? Logic should tell that what is right for one group is good for the other because both are equal. Religion and ignorance says otherwise. Legally speaking, denying one group the same rights as another is discrimination. It is unjust removal of rights based on a bias. No where does it say that marriage is for procreation, which is where your logic comes from. People procreate without marriage all the time. Thus, your opinion is void of logic.
riderofthestorm85 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"What logic are you using?" Uh, PURE logic. How can you argue about nature? Humans were created MALE and FEMALE! DUH! Those who don't understand how that works, are called R-E-T-A-R-D-S! Why do these retards need to get married anyway? It's a UNION between and man and a woman. A UNION where to different parts can be joined. You can NOT join two penises or two vaginas. Damn! My PURE LOGIC is undeniable!
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
If Marriage was all about mating, then marriages should be abolished for those not mating. Makes sense then, see by your terns if to individuals are not mating then they are not following nature. Paysonbadboy, why don't you join the rest of us in the 21st Century where we have moved beyond paleolithic definitions and into the realm of understanding. Oh, I guess I shouldn't also mention the homosexual tendencies present in both flora and fauna either.
riderofthestorm85 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Move into the 21st Century? Where being a RETARD is commended? Dude. Try as you must, but it is so OBVIOUS that Penis was made for Vagina, Vagina made for Penis. I mean, Damn, is that that hard for RETARDS to understand? MALE + FEMALE is the ONLY WAY. Unless you are a RETARD. Period. Case closed. I win because I know how my sex organ works.
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
Again, idiot... marriage has NOTHING to do with mating. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Why? Because two people can procreate with or without marriage. They do it all the time. Marriage is about commitment to another human being. You're just homophobic and too stubborn to admit it.
riderofthestorm85 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Marriage began as a sacred union between a MAN and a WOMAN. Because, after all, that is actually the only REAL way that we can mate. OPPOSITE SEXES! Only RETARDS get that SIMPLE FACT messed up, and now they want to turn marriage into an abortion by allowing the same sexes to marry? Why not just create a UNION FOR RETARDS pact or something instead? Same sex can't mate anyway. So it's pointless. Oh, unless you are a RETARD and think you are mating... shit! :p
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
the only RETARD i see here is you
marriage is about love
and if it was for mating, then infertle people and old couples arent really married then?
idaman12345 2 years ago
Marriage amendments are SOOOOO Yesterday!
...VOTE 'NO' on 8 in CA!
...VOTE 'NO' on 102 in AZ!
...VOTE for OBAMA in ALL States!
mchatow 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm voting YES on prop 102 in Arizona! Only a RETARD would think two people of the same sex should be joined!
paysonbadboy 3 years ago
Sorry to say this 'paysonbadboy', but you're the only retard in the room. And sadly, that in itself is an insult to all those developmentally disabled people out there. Keep living in your ignorant little world, while the rest of us shed the cromagnon-man like ways of the past.
riderofthestorm85 3 years ago 2
...MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS are SOOOO YESTERDAY!
I'm voting "NO" on Prop 102 in Arizona! Only a RETARD, like paysonbadboy, would think two people of the same sex should be joined!
"...GO OBAMA!!!...McLame SUCKS!"
mchatow 3 years ago 2
only a retard would vote to discriminate
idaman12345 2 years ago
" NO " on Prop 102 all the way!
mchatow 3 years ago 2
did you make those on the crapbook? lol
bozotheclown9 3 years ago
If you actually watched my full video, you see a glimpse of my iMac, which this video was edited on.
dontwalkhand 3 years ago