Germany had every right to fight back after ww1.I cant believe Germany is not in an uproar right now over all of this.They tried to defeat the the most evil people on the face of the earth.Patton respected the Germans and was disgusted at the celebrity treatment the Jews received after the war.Patton wanted to stop the Communist JEW soviets in their tracks but was stopped by the ZIO US government.Now we get to live it.Right here right now.Thanks all u PC neo- hippy idiots.surrounding me.
Churchill should have been hanged for warcrimes and genocide. The fact that the British worship a satanist massmurderer who killed millions of children, women and elderly, proves the wicked evil National character of theBritish.
It comes to little surprise their British Empire was the biggest and most murderous in human history. The British Empire invented racism, slums, concentration camps (Lord Kitchener 1899) and genocide. The British have a bad reputation in the world for their atrocities.
I hate to say this, but germany had a very high chance of winning the war. The factors that resulted in germany losing the war
(thank god) included: 1.Japan attacking the US, which brought in the Americans and their allies to war 2, Hitler taking personal control of all military forces (after he became paranoid from the number of assassination attempts on his life) and 3. The invasion of the Soviet Union which sent russia to war.
All in all, germany lost the war because of hitler himself.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@MrKguy97 the Germans were not even interested in winning the war with Britain, because 1) they had not started it and 2) after England started, the Germans made countless peace offers, but Churchill wanted war,
So i dont think its important who could have or could hvae not won the war. To me another question is important: Was it really the Germans who are guilty of this war? It was Churchill who dragged the USA into a regional European conflict.
@LovelyElbe11 the germans did start the war. they attacked and took over surrounding countries, some of which were allied to the allied superpowers-this is how germany started the war. germany tried to consolidate the british so that when they gained the tactical advantage they could easily and successfully strike. also it was the british who were trying to gain peace with germany. but when churchill came to power in britain he made the good decision to declare war.
@MrKguy97 he also didn't expect Britain to join the war. Hitler thought Britain wouldn't join, he wanting an allience with Britain. When Britain joined the war, so did the entire common wealth, Even when britain was forced to defend it's island, we still bomed germany, made the first defeat of the nazis by beatining the luff waffer. We also did our best to contain the nazis in europe for a entire year while we fought them alone, hence why we were fighting in africa, they lost coz good men fought
@ccclllsport The commonwealth was overall losing before the other superpowers joined (USSR and US). The French Resistance was crumbling and one way or another the luftwaffen would of sent more bombings and the werehmacht (bad spelling) and the kriegsmarine would of sent troops onto mainland Britain. But still I guess when you put everything together, Hitler got clusterf*cked in the a**.
@MrKguy97 aye maybe, but Britain was testing anthrax on an island of the coast of scotland. The British at the time were prepared to starve the german people, you can't invade on an empty stomach haah
After having gained both Austria and Czechoslovakia, Hitler was confident that he could again move east, this time acquiring Poland without having to fight Britain or France. (To eliminate the possibility of the Soviet Union fighting if Poland were attacked, Hitler made a pact with the Soviet Union - the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact.)
So that Germany did not officially seem the aggressor (which it was), Hitler needed an excuse for attacking Poland. It was Heinrich Himmler who came up with the idea; thus the plan was code-named Operation Himmler.
On the night of August 31, 1939, Nazis took an unknown prisoner from one of their concentration camps, dressed him in a Polish uniform, took him to the town of Gleiwitz (on the border of Poland and Germany), and then shot him. The staged scene with the dead prisoner dressed in a Polish uniform was supposed to appear as a Polish attack against a German radio station.
Hitler used this staged attack as the excuse to invade Poland.
@oooohaghmeladdie invading poland was his biggest mistake because britain signed a treaty with poland a year or so before stating as soon as poland were invaded we would declare war on germany hence 3rd september 1939 we declared war.
@LadyMikala It was not Germany who started the war on Poland. You probably do not know that the Poles occupied German land , they had invaded first in 1919 and they harrased over 2 Million German families who had to live under Polish occupation. Would you like to live under Alien rule?
Germany had asked the Poles several times to stop their terror, but they rejected as they were encouraged by the British "unconditional guarantee".
The war is mainly British and Polish guilt - like it or not.
@LadyMikala Also notice it was the British who made the Poles invade into Germany in 1919, with their criminal Versailles dictate. This is a fact the british try to embezzle and hide. If the British had not forced millions of people under Polish rule, this war would not have happened. Would you allow the French to invade England with tanks and take your land and harras your people?
No you wouldnt, England would start war to kick the intruders out, and so did the Germans.
@LadyMikala also note that this "treaty" was nonsense. Where was your treaty on 17th september 1939? Stalin invaded Poland too, and that was alright to you? Proves that "helping Poland" was a lie.
Also note that it was the Polish who invaded Germany first and stole German land. Why did you British fools not help the Germans, when the Poles invaded in 1919 and oppressed millions of people in their own homes? Over 1 Million German families fled their own homes, why did you not help THEM?
@LovelyElbe11 That is right Adolf Hitler was a great man and Germany did no wrong in WW2. The holocaust was also an allied lie. The Western Allies are the real criminals. We must reminisce about the good old days when Germany was all white and our great leader Adolf Hitler was in power.
Hitler wanted more land, especially in the east, to expand Germany according to the Nazi policy of lebensraum. Hitler used the harsh limitations that were set against Germany in the Versailles Treaty as a pretext for Germany's right to acquire land where German-speaking people lived. Germany successfully used this reasoning to envelop two entire countries without starting a war.
Many people have wondered why Germany was allowed to take over both Austria and Czechoslovakia without a fight. The simple reason is that Great Britain and France did not want to repeat the bloodshed of World War I. They believed, wrongly as it turned out, they could avoid another world war by appeasing Hitler with a few concessions (such as Austria and Czechoslovakia).
Hitler was a evil tryrant who forced the german people into giving up their freedom for a few shillings and later their lives so whats this got to do with the jews who supported hitler on his way to power.
What a boring speech. No wonder it's only got a few viewers. And it was posted in April 2008! Can we not just bombed Germany again just for old times sake that would be good. Only joking? Maybe just one little bombing.
@Crime1234management Dude, it ain't supposed to be Lady Gaga. He's telling the free people of the world that they've defeated the most evil threat they've ever faced. I promise it had enormous meaning for its intended audience. In Churchill's words the British people as a whole went "happily mad" on hearing it. I'm not aware of anything that you might deem more exciting that has ever set a population to such joy and relief.
Hitler needed only 20 months to generate the "6 million jobs" which rescued the Germans from the constant threat of starvation. The economic miracle achieved by Hitler showed all of the nations how to overcome jewish criminology thru political science. To overwrite the incredible "6 million jobs" achievement the jew-funded nations disseminated the bogus claim that Hitler achieved "6 million" jewish deaths. Nobody has ever presented any proof that even 100,000 jewish deaths resulted from WW2.
Churchill blindly followed the orders passed down by his jewish masters to firebomb German civilians in 1940. Only after scores of Germans had been massacred did Hitler reciprocate. Nobody could ever see how Churchill possibly was able to afford the sprawling estate where he resided between WW1 and WW2. No doubt that Churchill was on the jewish payroll as their war mongerer number one. Neville Chamberlain stated for the record that Churchill's barbarism was direct violation of international law
@MaxSpaTemp103 Oh, so youre a fucking nut job then. Whats the weather like on your planet? 'Only after scores of Germans';. Youre such a tit i amaze even myself that i have bothered telling you that youre such a tit, thats how much of a tit you are. Fuck it, this could be fun. What Jewish payroll, and what barbarism (compared to what was going on at the time that you have chosen to ignore in favour of concentrating on Churchill) made him so barberous as to rouse comment from you over all others?
warsaw was bombed into dust this was done by germany first in world war II.500.000 CHILDEN were gased and shot by the germans in world war II GERMANY DO NOT LOOK FOR THE HIGH GROUND ON THIS SUBJECT YOU HAVE NONE.
no one need apologize to germany ,for killing and being responsible for the death of over 12 million people in WWII.you sir are sick ,germany started the war in europe not britain.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No, your Western propaganda is sick, Poland started the war in Europe, they refused to allow German shipments to the severed Ostpreußen, then Germany needed to save its people from starvation and hit. Watch Wer wollte den Krieg series, if someone of you speaks German. Then USA started the war in the Pacific.They imposed an oil embargo on the Japanese Empire and it was forced to hit.Those are the aggressors.Roosevelt had deciphered the Japanese codes, he had known for Pearl Harbour weaks before.
Read anything on Conspiracy theories and why people tend to WANT to believe something that is not supported by a tide of evidence. The fault of war is irrelavant it was type of government and set of circumstances of Facism that lead to war not people of Germany or the UK. If facism took over in the UK which it well might have (black shirts etc) the UK could have caused simaliar aggression and war crimes. Lets not forget we are all human and all have the ability to cause great good and evil.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sure Nazi's wasn't saints, but Churchill is the same war criminal as Hitler, Goering, Gebels and others. Only in one night during bombing of Hamburg was killed over 40000 civilians.
hamburg was fire bombed in response to hitler bombing london ,hitler changed from trying to destroy the royal airforce to trying to bomb brittains people into submission.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You are wrong my friend. I dont remeber the dates now,. but i know for sure, that Churchill started it. And Hitler order to bomb london in revenge for that. And thats main reason why Fon Brauns rocket Vergeltungswaffe (V and V2) was called retaliation weapon.
" hamburg was fire bombed in response to hitler bombing london "
British lies. You started the Blitz. The Berlin blitz was BEFORE the London blitz: your fat pig Churchill, evil warcriminal, pounded Berlin for a whole week. London was BOMBED BACK, you moron. Learn history.
1) Britain started war on Germany, not the other way round.
2) Germany made several peace offers, Churchill rejected because he wanted war.
3) Britain started bombing German cities, Germany bombed you back.
4) Germans never deliberately "massacred" any British civilian before Britain started to slaughter German children. Only then the Germans reluctantly started doing the same.
"nazi's were masacreing civilians and bombing them before britain was in the war."
No they weren't, you liar. Your British grandfather massacred Red Indians many centuries before this war. Do you want me to give you a list of all the innocents, massacred by you dirty British pigs? And the Red Indian Holocaust, perpetrated by your criminal forefather, was just one of several British Holocausts. No need to hide, mate, i know them all anyway. Read your own evil country's history.
The Bombing of Warsaw in World War II refers both to the terror bombing campaign by Luftwaffe during the September Campaign and to the German bombing raids on Warsaw during the Warsaw Uprising. In the course of the war approximately 90% of the city was destroyed, largely due to German mass bombings.sept 28 .1939
@Niekshaz Churchill did't order the first bombing of civilian targets i the war, he could't have since the germans bombed Warsaw as they invaded Poland. Before britain even entered the war.
You must have been reading meine kampf or something telling you that Germany is great and honourable and everyone else is evil. Try doing some rudimentary research. You say Poland wasn't any of our business, why was it yours. Why should you be able to invade it at will.
First there are two absolutely different things: bombing Warsaw (there was a front line and most of civilian population already have left the city) and bombing Berlin there was no front line at the moment, just civilians. .
And the second: Britain declared war on Germany at 11.15 on September 3rd 1939, and bombing of Warsaw started at September 8
@Niekshaz the bombing of Warsaw may not have begun when Britain declared war but the Germans had already invaded the country as they had already done to checkoslovakia. To claim that we British were the aggressors requires extreme stupidity and ignorance. As for the second claim the germans not only bombed Warsaw but also bombed London, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Manchester, Liverpool and others, all being deliberate civilian targets. Yes I regret that we stooped to your level but its already done
So once again lets look to the facts: Why so called aggressor (Germany) invaded Czechoslovakia and Poland. Chechs were not invaded at all actually , they just returned "Sudeten land" which whey got after world war one and which was in Germany reich for hundreds of years and most of people living there was Germans.
Poland got their share of German pie after WW1, that share was Danzig. And all that Germans wanted was to return that city, but... we all know how that ended.
@Niekshaz with regard to 'giving' back the sudetan land, they only did so under the threat of destruction after Chamberlain failed to defend them as he should of against Nazi aggression. And didn't actually invade?! you occupied the whole country after heavy fighting against badly equiped czechoslovakians trying to repel your invasion in March 1939, before the war broke out. As for Poland, you marched directly on Warsaw, hardly a reclamation of the land that was yours.
Austria was taken as German land On March 13, 1938. Hitler believed any German speaking country should be German land. This was Acquired without bloodshed. Czechoslovakia: At the Munich Conference on September 28-29, 1938, the French and the British handed Germany a large portion of Czechoslovakia. Hitler then took the rest of Czechoslovakia by March 1939.
@Elberiver11 If that's what you believe, fine, believe it. The real question is, which country lost both times? If Germany had won either war the world would be much worse than it is now.
And remember, your evil British Empire started both wars on Germany and even dragging the USA into it - which made it a world war. Germany was at war with Poland only, none of your fucking business, you British racists. What a funny pretext,an invasion. You invaded Ireland, so the world has the right to invade and bomb you , right? You British criminals invaded far more countries than germany did, and you try to hide it. Forget it, i know British history. You apparantly do not.
@Elberiver11 oh dear, you really have a very funny take on world history- Britain had a protectorate pact with Poland so it was "her business" - - Do you think it would be less "evil" of Britain to abandon her ally in time of need? and where does racism come into it?-I think it's pretty clear which side were racists. I'm guessing your're an ignorant twat so I dont know why I'm wasting my time on you- You're probably another holocaust denier.
@ovadafone LOL Britain never started any war in Europe? Ask the Irish, hahaha! moron
You British warcriminals attacked at least 100 nations, and when the Germans are in trouble with a neighbour, then you think you have to stick your dirty nose into that?
Go back home and mind your own business, you stupid island-apes! lol
99% of British people can see that the British Empire had bad things as well as good. You on the other hand are just ignorant and can only see the bad.
They need perfect people created out of all this controlled bull shit.
Deny those you dislike - Starve out poor people - Worship the rich people - Taxes that crush the lower class - Wars that have no end created out of fear - Lies - Controlled media - Leaders you can't trust.
I know Cecil Rhodes, Ian Smih and others but IN GENERAL the British Empire has been based in liberal demoracy. Bad things and good things. But finally parliament and liberal democracy have prevailed. Nazis only wanted slavery and extermination.
Even Spain succeed (with good things and bad things). I cannot understand the admiration for Hitler. He was the worst strategist I have ever seen. His foolish decissions led Germany to defeat and disaster.Even a 7 year old boy would have done better.
Great Britain did bad things (even slavery) and good things, but tfinally GB didn't create an Empire based upon race or racial superiority but an Empire based upon liberal democracy (e.g. India) the dominant form of democracies in the 21th century.
Hitler didn't want democracy at all. Hitler wanted pure extermination of people.
you didn´t read a lot about cecil rhodes and other british imperialists and their believe of the superiority of the nordic anglo-saxon race
they also established concentration camps in south africa and kenya, slavery for black people in america and destruction of the indians and australians
democracy was thought for their own kind (the white english)
"I will not pretend that if I had to choose between Communism and Nazism, I would choose Communism." - Winston Churchill.
For the people who can't decipher a quote Churchill was saying that he would also have chosen Nazism over Communism just like how the German people chose Nazism
That's the basic Reagan-Thatcher phylosophy: transfering all responsibility to the society of what society wants to be. If you loose, you must bear the loss as far as if you win you will enjoy the profits. It´s the ABC of this way of life.
Free market. A free market puts out bad bankers and uncontrolled financers. Free market is not the bankers, it is a system. Bankers who do their job well succed and bad markets crash and their way out is bankruptcy. The free market regulates itself by putting out the bad bankers. What the State shouldn't do is to help them. Just let them crash and the free market will have done its work by putting them out.
that is exactly what the anglo-saxon nations NOT do. They have a tremendous huge financial-industry and services, little industrial production and enormous debts to foreign countries
they save their bancrupt banks and by their subprime junk papers
this could mean for the future that they will be bankrupt or they start a new war
But its values, its language have spread all over the world. That's what matters.
I must say Germany is a beautiful conutry. I have nothing against Germany. It is against Hitler. He was a menace for the Free World.
World is changing, I know that. For example, the United States will be a bilingual country, it has been said that 132million people will speak Spanish in the United States in in 2050.
i hope you don´t mean uncontrolled finance capitalism, war against "terror", tortouring political enemies or self-righteos hypocrisy their political leaders standed recent years
Passionate rants and the declaration that an ethnic group has "stolen" Germania...
This sounds VERY familiar... you see, I don't know how your history is, but back in 1939 this chap from Austria, who claimed to be German did something very similar. It ended badly for him.
lol ironically using the word Anglo-Saxon implies the descendants of the Angle and the Saxon tribes, both of which were German.... hehe oh the irony...
Yes, but the Anglo-Saxons left their genetic ability to lose unlosable wars (and still try again in a few decade's time) behind in Germany before migrating into Scandinavia, the British Isles and beyond...
"I will not pretend that if I had to choose between Communism and Nazism, I would choose Communism." - Winston Churchill, 1937
"An extraordinary man." - neutral Spain's Franco describing Hitler to the Portuguese ambassador
"...now Germany is against the power of evil incarnated in the Anglo-Saxon/Soviet coalition managed by the Jews." - neutral Spain's Luis Blanco writing to Franco with his assessment of Germany's situation right after the USA joined atheist communist Russia in WWII
We paid every last cent of the USA debt back, with interest. The last payment was made in 2002 completing our obligations and settling the debt completely.
BRITAIN WAS THE ONLY COUNTRY TO THIS BTW.... FRANCE AND GERMANY DEFAULTED ON THERE DEBT TO THE USA
we paid all your money back with intrest and to be honest i dont think we should have, the war involved you hittler was unstopable and he would of captured usa once he gained enough power britan was the only country that had the balls to stand up to him befor he gained enough power to capture half the world and russia only got involved cuz he attacked them and usa got involved cuz japan pulled you in and we won when hittler attacked russia anyway we only needed you to help us do it quicker.
It was British "bluster" & French pride, that got them into trouble trying to save Poland from Germany. You guys didn't do your homework, were not prepared for a land war with Germany, got your socks knocked off in Europe & kicked off the continent, then cried for help, to drag everyone else in. Churchill was a terrific salesman, and the US bought..Germany to invade the US..LOL how...??
@hitide286 Well without a Second front (no need to station large numbers of troops in France) Germany would have probably beaten Russia... and with all the resources of Europe and large parts of Russia and the technological power the Germans had, you really think the USA would have stayed free for long? Thing is WW2 revitialised your country if Hitler had won in Europe and Asia... You would have been fucked with no-one to sell your Tanks and Bullets too!
@CptBritish No Cpt. don't think you are even close with your "therory'" If that was the case why did Stalin constantly pester Rossevelt & Churhill for a second front.?? Germany did not have the resourses/equipment to invade the US . You forget whom Russia was getting alot of her supplies from. The US was the only Allied power to fight two major fronts at the same...We would have nuked Germany first instead of Japan..opps guess you forgot about that..cheers!!!
@hitide286 No he was asking for a invasion, There already was a second front, It doesn't matter if that front has a bit of water in the middle! Yes Russia was getting alot of her supplies from you? and? whats that go to do with price of bread. No they didn't have it but they were close to developing it, In twilight of the war they were developing a bomber that could hit New York. Just imagine what they could have got in a few years. You keep your deluded "we are the best!" thoughts and fuck off.
@CptBritish Try growing up a bit ( yes tough act for you)...I NEVER SAID THE USA was the "best" you did, so it seems you are the one with the complex...and you might want to think about going back to school and paying attention this time..Stalin "never wanted" a second front in Europe..you are a fucking retard of the highest level
@hitide286 You call me a retard when you can't read you Hill billy fuck. Where did I say "Stalin didn't want a second front" I said he wanted us to invade Europe to take the pressure off them, You were the one that stated there wasn't a second front until the invasion, There was which is way Hilter left as many troop as he did in france! No I don't have a complex I just have a feeling that you are one of the "We saved the world" type of American, or as known to everyone else, Wankers.
@CptBritish hey mon-idiot, were was the second front before June 6,1944??? Now do you start a "second" front without an invasion???? Me thinks you should go back to grammer school to learn the queens "English"
@hitide286 Yea there was a front just not a land one... Basically the threat of a invasion was there, so Hitler left soldiers in France which he wouldn't have to do if Britain had been knocked out of the war, Which then could have been used in Russia, also we were bombing Germany before you guys even showed up I'm done with you anyway you obviously only know what Hollywood has said about WW2 anyway so i ain't replying to you anymore.
@CptBritish "they were developing a bomber that could hit New York"
They weren't even close, and it would take more than a long range bomber to win a war, any war. No fool in his right mind would plan an invasion of the United States, it would never succeed. Why do you think Hitler never even considered an invasion of Switzerland.
And hitide is right, we would've nuked Germany first.
@THUD086 No they weren't. But they were also at war on two fronts... What I'm trying to say is if we'd been knocked out of the war (Thus allowing Hitler to concentrate all his men and matierals on Russia) they would have won... Britain not been in the War would have been a nightmare situation. Hitler would have the middle east oil fields and beable to take the Persian ones... (Which is what the germans were mainly short of in the latter years)
@CptBritish Hitlers big gamble was to take the lucrative oil fields of Russia in Barbarossa, not the oil fields in the Middle East, he had no merchant marine to transport that oil. Whatever oil Hitler would get, would have to come over land, not the sea, the RN controlled the waters going into Germany.
You're speculating on the situation without the U.K. in the war. Hitler still wasn't prepared to fight a winter war in Russia, regardless, history has taught us that.
@THUD086 I'm not saying that the Germans would have been able to invade in like 1945, in the 1950s or 60s? yea i think they could have, No a Bomber wouldn't have done it on its own, The Allies bombing of Germany proved that, I was just using it as an example of what they were coming up with, Hitler was a complete twat but his scientists were Brilliant, and how would you nuke Germany without the UK as a base? and the Luffewaffe between the US and Germany?
@CptBritish The U.S. just didn't sit back and play dead, we produced the A-bomb before Germany ever could (Germany never got past R&D).
And as far as a base of operations, don't forget, Stalin was at war with Hitler also, and no doubt he would've given us access to Germany with the long range B-29.
In 1942, we sailed an amphibious assault from U.S. ports, right into No. Africa. Didn't need the U.K. for that.
@CptBritish Talk about your knowledge of history twat?? How would the US bomb Germany without England, you moron, the same way we bombed Toyko , they are called aircraft carriers you nim-rod..Hitler could'nt plan an invasion across the channel, so how was he going to go 3,500 miles..also from Greenland by 1944 US B-29's could have made the round trip flight..opps forgot the RAF did'nt have any long-range bombers of that calibre...
@CptBritish Let me remind you of what Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto once stated: "I would never plan an invasion of America,,,there's a gun behind every blade of grass".
He knew the U.S. culture very well, he went to college here. Do you remember me bringing up Switzerland a while ago? Hitler wouldn't even think of going into that country, because like the U.S.,he'd be fighting an armed population.
He couldn't invade the U.S in WW2, nor the 50's or 60's. You're dreaming, lad.
Go goggle 'England repaid its lend-lease loan", then get back to me. The ORIGINNAL amount was $31billion USD, what was "paid back"...and there where 6 years in which England paid nothing , that's why it took so long to pay off, the 10% of the loan at 2% interest, not a bad deal.!!!..the US taxpayer got left withe balance
I am so sick of ppl who would not get a set of balls if one were presented to them by great men shitting on those that do. Great men stand up when all else sit down and avoid eye contact, Great men do what must be done and small men will always bitch in hopes of hiding there own cowardliness. Stand up o you great men under the same God Winston Churchill did and win your victory for once again terrorism is upon us......
Rest my friend we are.. Save your breath though there are fools, your not one of them it seems. Prepare and act when grieve may come. But never give up hope.
A GREAT war leader. As a peace leader he was fairly inadequate, but he was our saviour at the deadliest point.
You may notice not a hint of gloating, of false modesty, or of self-praise. That is the true British spirit, and will live on while British hearts endure, in whatever colour skin they are encased.
God sent Churchill to save us in our darkest hour - praise Him and bless Churchill's memory! Advance Britannia!
I wish America would get more back on track with what its allies want. This was a time when America, The UK, and Free Europe stood together for freedom and democracy. I wish we could stand together again, what we ought to do is end Iraq ASAP and start working on building democracy in Afghanistan. If we work together there I'm sure we can be successful.However, first I think my country ought to start giving more respect to the nations of Europe, after all we have so much common history.
What a speech, and what a relief it must have been to have 6 years of hell behind you. Winston Churchill is without a doubt one of the great "bad asses" of all time!!
Winston Churchill is awesome. The only thing that bugs me about him is that he was a bit of an imperialist. Especially when it came to Indian independence. Still, a man of singular vision, and an amazing leader. A hero to all the allied nations.
er no because we dont have an empire and are not as strong as before so he wouldnt, british have gone soft? behave son u certainly aint a London lad ra ya!
It amuses me that Churchill is held up as an icon by the American right wing. He may have been an inspiration war leader, but his domestic policies after the War were very centrist (and he spent his first period in high office in the Liberal Party, where he helped to create the British welfare state).
Hitler is also one of the greatest politicians to ever have lived...i don't say i support what nazism and Hitler stood for, but he had remarkable speeches!
his tactics however was a failiure, and though he was a cunning man, he sure was a bastard...but remember, bastards and evil persons are humans too..that Hitler lost proves that he wasn't perfect and a human too :) you watch the news about an "evil" killer, but fails to mension that the same person perhaps is a good husband and a caring dad
I am always amazed at the intense stupidity that shows up on these comments. Hitler Married Eva Braun one day before they committed suicide. He had no children, but there is record of him sexually abusing a young female relative.
It is true that he had an evil, almost hypnotic effect on Germany, and that he continues to appeal to perverted white supremacists and other monsters, it is a terrible perversion of history to attempt to "humanize" this monster.
Hasselberg is right, man. Hitler was a political genius. How else could someone sell such evil schemes to otherwise good people? It doesn't mean what he did was right, nor that anyone admires the man himself; it just means you're calling a spade a spade: Hitler was a political genius AND the most ruthless and evil mass-murderer probably in the history of the world.
Hitler was one of the greatest at politics. I wouldn't say he was the greatest politician. To be the greatest you have to also be moral. Hitler was the most evil man who ever lived. A good politician must also be a good man. And Hitler was definitely not, while Churchill was for the most part a VERY Righteous MAN.
If hitler would have let the Jews live during WWII, he would have probably won, Jews could have been good fighters, 6 million jews dead? 6 million extra troops! (I'm not an anti Jew.) Was just thinking.
Germany had every right to fight back after ww1.I cant believe Germany is not in an uproar right now over all of this.They tried to defeat the the most evil people on the face of the earth.Patton respected the Germans and was disgusted at the celebrity treatment the Jews received after the war.Patton wanted to stop the Communist JEW soviets in their tracks but was stopped by the ZIO US government.Now we get to live it.Right here right now.Thanks all u PC neo- hippy idiots.surrounding me.
Mosquito1961 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Churchill should have been hanged for warcrimes and genocide. The fact that the British worship a satanist massmurderer who killed millions of children, women and elderly, proves the wicked evil National character of theBritish.
It comes to little surprise their British Empire was the biggest and most murderous in human history. The British Empire invented racism, slums, concentration camps (Lord Kitchener 1899) and genocide. The British have a bad reputation in the world for their atrocities.
LovelyElbe11 9 months ago
I hate to say this, but germany had a very high chance of winning the war. The factors that resulted in germany losing the war
(thank god) included: 1.Japan attacking the US, which brought in the Americans and their allies to war 2, Hitler taking personal control of all military forces (after he became paranoid from the number of assassination attempts on his life) and 3. The invasion of the Soviet Union which sent russia to war.
All in all, germany lost the war because of hitler himself.
MrKguy97 10 months ago
@MrKguy97 if Hitler wasn't ruler there probably would not have even been a holocaust and the Germans would be more humane
alcaponefan1 10 months ago
@MrKguy97 Hitler lost the war when he invaded Russia. That was the biggest military mistake in the history of humanity.
TheLiberalKnight 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@MrKguy97 the Germans were not even interested in winning the war with Britain, because 1) they had not started it and 2) after England started, the Germans made countless peace offers, but Churchill wanted war,
So i dont think its important who could have or could hvae not won the war. To me another question is important: Was it really the Germans who are guilty of this war? It was Churchill who dragged the USA into a regional European conflict.
LovelyElbe11 9 months ago
@LovelyElbe11 the germans did start the war. they attacked and took over surrounding countries, some of which were allied to the allied superpowers-this is how germany started the war. germany tried to consolidate the british so that when they gained the tactical advantage they could easily and successfully strike. also it was the british who were trying to gain peace with germany. but when churchill came to power in britain he made the good decision to declare war.
MrKguy97 9 months ago
@MrKguy97 he also didn't expect Britain to join the war. Hitler thought Britain wouldn't join, he wanting an allience with Britain. When Britain joined the war, so did the entire common wealth, Even when britain was forced to defend it's island, we still bomed germany, made the first defeat of the nazis by beatining the luff waffer. We also did our best to contain the nazis in europe for a entire year while we fought them alone, hence why we were fighting in africa, they lost coz good men fought
ccclllsport 6 months ago
@ccclllsport The commonwealth was overall losing before the other superpowers joined (USSR and US). The French Resistance was crumbling and one way or another the luftwaffen would of sent more bombings and the werehmacht (bad spelling) and the kriegsmarine would of sent troops onto mainland Britain. But still I guess when you put everything together, Hitler got clusterf*cked in the a**.
MrKguy97 6 months ago
@MrKguy97 aye maybe, but Britain was testing anthrax on an island of the coast of scotland. The British at the time were prepared to starve the german people, you can't invade on an empty stomach haah
ccclllsport 6 months ago
google this:
history1900s.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/wwiistarts.htm
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
Comment removed
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
After having gained both Austria and Czechoslovakia, Hitler was confident that he could again move east, this time acquiring Poland without having to fight Britain or France. (To eliminate the possibility of the Soviet Union fighting if Poland were attacked, Hitler made a pact with the Soviet Union - the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact.)
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So that Germany did not officially seem the aggressor (which it was), Hitler needed an excuse for attacking Poland. It was Heinrich Himmler who came up with the idea; thus the plan was code-named Operation Himmler.
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
On the night of August 31, 1939, Nazis took an unknown prisoner from one of their concentration camps, dressed him in a Polish uniform, took him to the town of Gleiwitz (on the border of Poland and Germany), and then shot him. The staged scene with the dead prisoner dressed in a Polish uniform was supposed to appear as a Polish attack against a German radio station.
Hitler used this staged attack as the excuse to invade Poland.
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
@oooohaghmeladdie invading poland was his biggest mistake because britain signed a treaty with poland a year or so before stating as soon as poland were invaded we would declare war on germany hence 3rd september 1939 we declared war.
LadyMikala 1 year ago
@LadyMikala It was not Germany who started the war on Poland. You probably do not know that the Poles occupied German land , they had invaded first in 1919 and they harrased over 2 Million German families who had to live under Polish occupation. Would you like to live under Alien rule?
Germany had asked the Poles several times to stop their terror, but they rejected as they were encouraged by the British "unconditional guarantee".
The war is mainly British and Polish guilt - like it or not.
LovelyElbe11 9 months ago
@LadyMikala Also notice it was the British who made the Poles invade into Germany in 1919, with their criminal Versailles dictate. This is a fact the british try to embezzle and hide. If the British had not forced millions of people under Polish rule, this war would not have happened. Would you allow the French to invade England with tanks and take your land and harras your people?
No you wouldnt, England would start war to kick the intruders out, and so did the Germans.
LovelyElbe11 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LadyMikala also note that this "treaty" was nonsense. Where was your treaty on 17th september 1939? Stalin invaded Poland too, and that was alright to you? Proves that "helping Poland" was a lie.
Also note that it was the Polish who invaded Germany first and stole German land. Why did you British fools not help the Germans, when the Poles invaded in 1919 and oppressed millions of people in their own homes? Over 1 Million German families fled their own homes, why did you not help THEM?
LovelyElbe11 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LovelyElbe11 That is right Adolf Hitler was a great man and Germany did no wrong in WW2. The holocaust was also an allied lie. The Western Allies are the real criminals. We must reminisce about the good old days when Germany was all white and our great leader Adolf Hitler was in power.
Heil Hitler Deutschland erwache! 14/88
EIbeGoId 9 months ago
Comment removed
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
Hitler wanted more land, especially in the east, to expand Germany according to the Nazi policy of lebensraum. Hitler used the harsh limitations that were set against Germany in the Versailles Treaty as a pretext for Germany's right to acquire land where German-speaking people lived. Germany successfully used this reasoning to envelop two entire countries without starting a war.
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
Many people have wondered why Germany was allowed to take over both Austria and Czechoslovakia without a fight. The simple reason is that Great Britain and France did not want to repeat the bloodshed of World War I. They believed, wrongly as it turned out, they could avoid another world war by appeasing Hitler with a few concessions (such as Austria and Czechoslovakia).
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
Winston Churchill is a British Hero.
MajBlood 1 year ago 2
Hitler was a evil tryrant who forced the german people into giving up their freedom for a few shillings and later their lives so whats this got to do with the jews who supported hitler on his way to power.
FingersGreen0 1 year ago
What a boring speech. No wonder it's only got a few viewers. And it was posted in April 2008! Can we not just bombed Germany again just for old times sake that would be good. Only joking? Maybe just one little bombing.
Crime1234management 1 year ago
@Crime1234management Dude, it ain't supposed to be Lady Gaga. He's telling the free people of the world that they've defeated the most evil threat they've ever faced. I promise it had enormous meaning for its intended audience. In Churchill's words the British people as a whole went "happily mad" on hearing it. I'm not aware of anything that you might deem more exciting that has ever set a population to such joy and relief.
mduncan81 1 year ago
Hitler needed only 20 months to generate the "6 million jobs" which rescued the Germans from the constant threat of starvation. The economic miracle achieved by Hitler showed all of the nations how to overcome jewish criminology thru political science. To overwrite the incredible "6 million jobs" achievement the jew-funded nations disseminated the bogus claim that Hitler achieved "6 million" jewish deaths. Nobody has ever presented any proof that even 100,000 jewish deaths resulted from WW2.
MaxSpaTemp103 1 year ago
Churchill blindly followed the orders passed down by his jewish masters to firebomb German civilians in 1940. Only after scores of Germans had been massacred did Hitler reciprocate. Nobody could ever see how Churchill possibly was able to afford the sprawling estate where he resided between WW1 and WW2. No doubt that Churchill was on the jewish payroll as their war mongerer number one. Neville Chamberlain stated for the record that Churchill's barbarism was direct violation of international law
MaxSpaTemp103 1 year ago
@MaxSpaTemp103 Oh, so youre a fucking nut job then. Whats the weather like on your planet? 'Only after scores of Germans';. Youre such a tit i amaze even myself that i have bothered telling you that youre such a tit, thats how much of a tit you are. Fuck it, this could be fun. What Jewish payroll, and what barbarism (compared to what was going on at the time that you have chosen to ignore in favour of concentrating on Churchill) made him so barberous as to rouse comment from you over all others?
jonpy55 1 year ago
It's a good thing Sir Winston Churchill was 1/2 American, the drinkin' half.
hopeurfree 1 year ago
HURRRAAAAAAA
HUURRRRAAAAAA
HURRRAAA
Karletto555 1 year ago
12 million dead? Where did you get your figures from? Russia alone lost 25 million people, and then there's the Holocaust....
jhjyjfg 1 year ago
ovadafone, where do you get your figures? It was 25 million dead just for the Russians?
jhjyjfg 1 year ago
Good to hear this speech on St Georges Day.The dirty German scum defeated.Britain,Russia and USA all brothers in arms.
williejohn99 1 year ago
warsaw was bombed into dust this was done by germany first in world war II.500.000 CHILDEN were gased and shot by the germans in world war II GERMANY DO NOT LOOK FOR THE HIGH GROUND ON THIS SUBJECT YOU HAVE NONE.
ovadafone 1 year ago
Neo Nazis are LOSERS. Take up arms, us Americans will kick your ass again.
Nezhy 2 years ago
i am glad that nazi lost or i would have been a throw rug for a germany family!
55redsox 2 years ago
Whatever you do don't mention the war.
I did once ,but I think I got away with it.
bmrs86 2 years ago
Er hatte Deutschland den Krieg erklärt. = Hauptkriegsverbrecher.
carinhall1 2 years ago
no one need apologize to germany ,for killing and being responsible for the death of over 12 million people in WWII.you sir are sick ,germany started the war in europe not britain.
ovadafone 2 years ago 15
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No, your Western propaganda is sick, Poland started the war in Europe, they refused to allow German shipments to the severed Ostpreußen, then Germany needed to save its people from starvation and hit. Watch Wer wollte den Krieg series, if someone of you speaks German. Then USA started the war in the Pacific.They imposed an oil embargo on the Japanese Empire and it was forced to hit.Those are the aggressors.Roosevelt had deciphered the Japanese codes, he had known for Pearl Harbour weaks before.
Omnesvulnerantun 2 years ago
Read anything on Conspiracy theories and why people tend to WANT to believe something that is not supported by a tide of evidence. The fault of war is irrelavant it was type of government and set of circumstances of Facism that lead to war not people of Germany or the UK. If facism took over in the UK which it well might have (black shirts etc) the UK could have caused simaliar aggression and war crimes. Lets not forget we are all human and all have the ability to cause great good and evil.
webcon19 2 years ago
But Churchill was the first one who order to bomb civil targets.
Niekshaz 2 years ago
i beg to differ the nazi's were masacreing civilians and bombing them before britain was in the war.
ovadafone 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sure Nazi's wasn't saints, but Churchill is the same war criminal as Hitler, Goering, Gebels and others. Only in one night during bombing of Hamburg was killed over 40000 civilians.
Niekshaz 2 years ago
hamburg was fire bombed in response to hitler bombing london ,hitler changed from trying to destroy the royal airforce to trying to bomb brittains people into submission.
ovadafone 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are wrong my friend. I dont remeber the dates now,. but i know for sure, that Churchill started it. And Hitler order to bomb london in revenge for that. And thats main reason why Fon Brauns rocket Vergeltungswaffe (V and V2) was called retaliation weapon.
Niekshaz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ovadafone
" hamburg was fire bombed in response to hitler bombing london "
British lies. You started the Blitz. The Berlin blitz was BEFORE the London blitz: your fat pig Churchill, evil warcriminal, pounded Berlin for a whole week. London was BOMBED BACK, you moron. Learn history.
Hamburg + Dresden + Kassel + Sweenemünde = TERROR BOMBING HOLOCAUST
Elberiver11 1 year ago
@ovadafone
Dont tell us your silly lies. The truth is:
1) Britain started war on Germany, not the other way round.
2) Germany made several peace offers, Churchill rejected because he wanted war.
3) Britain started bombing German cities, Germany bombed you back.
4) Germans never deliberately "massacred" any British civilian before Britain started to slaughter German children. Only then the Germans reluctantly started doing the same.
Elberiver11 1 year ago
@ovadafone
"nazi's were masacreing civilians and bombing them before britain was in the war."
No they weren't, you liar. Your British grandfather massacred Red Indians many centuries before this war. Do you want me to give you a list of all the innocents, massacred by you dirty British pigs? And the Red Indian Holocaust, perpetrated by your criminal forefather, was just one of several British Holocausts. No need to hide, mate, i know them all anyway. Read your own evil country's history.
Elberiver11 1 year ago
The Bombing of Warsaw in World War II refers both to the terror bombing campaign by Luftwaffe during the September Campaign and to the German bombing raids on Warsaw during the Warsaw Uprising. In the course of the war approximately 90% of the city was destroyed, largely due to German mass bombings.sept 28 .1939
hamburg was fire bombed on july 24,1943-aug 3
ovadafone 2 years ago 2
@Niekshaz Churchill did't order the first bombing of civilian targets i the war, he could't have since the germans bombed Warsaw as they invaded Poland. Before britain even entered the war.
TruthMediaRadio 1 year ago
@TruthMediaRadio
Britain started bombing Germany, try to talk yourself out of it all you like. You cannot change history.
Poland was none of your fucking business. You invaded Ireland, did we start a world war on you, because you invaded Ireland? British criminals.
Elberiver11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TruthMediaRadio
Britain started bombing Germany, try to talk yourself out of it all you like. You cannot change history.
Poland was none of your fucking business. You invaded Ireland, did we start a world war on you, because you invaded Ireland? British criminals.
Elberiver11 1 year ago
You must have been reading meine kampf or something telling you that Germany is great and honourable and everyone else is evil. Try doing some rudimentary research. You say Poland wasn't any of our business, why was it yours. Why should you be able to invade it at will.
TruthMediaRadio 1 year ago
@TruthMediaRadio
In this small post you made two mistakes.
First there are two absolutely different things: bombing Warsaw (there was a front line and most of civilian population already have left the city) and bombing Berlin there was no front line at the moment, just civilians. .
And the second: Britain declared war on Germany at 11.15 on September 3rd 1939, and bombing of Warsaw started at September 8
Niekshaz 1 year ago
@Niekshaz the bombing of Warsaw may not have begun when Britain declared war but the Germans had already invaded the country as they had already done to checkoslovakia. To claim that we British were the aggressors requires extreme stupidity and ignorance. As for the second claim the germans not only bombed Warsaw but also bombed London, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Manchester, Liverpool and others, all being deliberate civilian targets. Yes I regret that we stooped to your level but its already done
TruthMediaRadio 1 year ago
@TruthMediaRadio
So once again lets look to the facts: Why so called aggressor (Germany) invaded Czechoslovakia and Poland. Chechs were not invaded at all actually , they just returned "Sudeten land" which whey got after world war one and which was in Germany reich for hundreds of years and most of people living there was Germans.
Poland got their share of German pie after WW1, that share was Danzig. And all that Germans wanted was to return that city, but... we all know how that ended.
Niekshaz 1 year ago
@Niekshaz with regard to 'giving' back the sudetan land, they only did so under the threat of destruction after Chamberlain failed to defend them as he should of against Nazi aggression. And didn't actually invade?! you occupied the whole country after heavy fighting against badly equiped czechoslovakians trying to repel your invasion in March 1939, before the war broke out. As for Poland, you marched directly on Warsaw, hardly a reclamation of the land that was yours.
TruthMediaRadio 1 year ago
Comment removed
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
Austria was taken as German land On March 13, 1938. Hitler believed any German speaking country should be German land. This was Acquired without bloodshed. Czechoslovakia: At the Munich Conference on September 28-29, 1938, the French and the British handed Germany a large portion of Czechoslovakia. Hitler then took the rest of Czechoslovakia by March 1939.
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
Comment removed
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
Comment removed
oooohaghmeladdie 1 year ago
@ovadafone
Britain started both wars with Germany. Read history.
Elberiver11 1 year ago
@Elberiver11 Germany invadede 2 countrys before Britain declard war... so that is rubbish, germany started... End of discussion :)
dalefantom 1 year ago
@Elberiver11 If that's what you believe, fine, believe it. The real question is, which country lost both times? If Germany had won either war the world would be much worse than it is now.
haggis95 1 year ago
And remember, your evil British Empire started both wars on Germany and even dragging the USA into it - which made it a world war. Germany was at war with Poland only, none of your fucking business, you British racists. What a funny pretext,an invasion. You invaded Ireland, so the world has the right to invade and bomb you , right? You British criminals invaded far more countries than germany did, and you try to hide it. Forget it, i know British history. You apparantly do not.
Elberiver11 1 year ago
@Elberiver11 oh dear, you really have a very funny take on world history- Britain had a protectorate pact with Poland so it was "her business" - - Do you think it would be less "evil" of Britain to abandon her ally in time of need? and where does racism come into it?-I think it's pretty clear which side were racists. I'm guessing your're an ignorant twat so I dont know why I'm wasting my time on you- You're probably another holocaust denier.
CDStoner 1 year ago
@Elberiver11 You a complete retard so i'll bullet point these points for you.
1. Germany Annexes Austia, Fair enough they wanted it.
2. Germany Occupied the Sudetenland, Robbing the Czech's of their border defences.
3. Germany Annexes Czechoslovakia, Which incase you don't know DIDN'T want that.
4. Germany invades Poland which Great Britain and France both said they would guarantee its independance.
5. Germany then goes onto Annex Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Netherlands and France.
CptBritish 1 year ago
@ovadafone Not Germany, Hitler.
TheLiberalKnight 9 months ago
@ovadafone LOL Britain never started any war in Europe? Ask the Irish, hahaha! moron
You British warcriminals attacked at least 100 nations, and when the Germans are in trouble with a neighbour, then you think you have to stick your dirty nose into that?
Go back home and mind your own business, you stupid island-apes! lol
LovelyElbe11 9 months ago
@ovadafone Britain = guilty of starting two world wars on Germany,
The Germans never started war on Britain in all of human history. Too bad your lies are so easily debunked.
LovelyElbe11 9 months ago
@ovadafone LOL What?
ROlshansky1 7 months ago
I defend liberal democracy and, of course, Great Britain was nearer liberal democracy than Nazi Germany was.
joulukk 2 years ago 6
99% of British people can see that the British Empire had bad things as well as good. You on the other hand are just ignorant and can only see the bad.
zBloodD3monz 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
This planet is fucked up anyways.
Killers - Criminals - Starvation - Poverty - Governments - Terrorist - Bankers - Unemployment.
They need perfect people created out of all this controlled bull shit.
Deny those you dislike - Starve out poor people - Worship the rich people - Taxes that crush the lower class - Wars that have no end created out of fear - Lies - Controlled media - Leaders you can't trust.
Where is Jesus today.
Why do we let bad people rule all others.
God is M.I.A. -|-
Snowman374th 2 years ago
I defend liberal democracy. Great Britain defends liberal democracy. Menguele didn't defend liberal democracy.
joulukk 2 years ago 3
May the Lord heal your heart of its discontent, and bring you peace. Amen
stanistani 2 years ago 2
Amen. -|-
Snowman374th 2 years ago
I know Cecil Rhodes, Ian Smih and others but IN GENERAL the British Empire has been based in liberal demoracy. Bad things and good things. But finally parliament and liberal democracy have prevailed. Nazis only wanted slavery and extermination.
joulukk 2 years ago 4
British Empire brought civilization and democracy its empire the Nazis brought death and destruction to theirs
some points you made are logical
ctbagman 2 years ago 4
Even Spain succeed (with good things and bad things). I cannot understand the admiration for Hitler. He was the worst strategist I have ever seen. His foolish decissions led Germany to defeat and disaster.Even a 7 year old boy would have done better.
joulukk 2 years ago
Great Britain did bad things (even slavery) and good things, but tfinally GB didn't create an Empire based upon race or racial superiority but an Empire based upon liberal democracy (e.g. India) the dominant form of democracies in the 21th century.
Hitler didn't want democracy at all. Hitler wanted pure extermination of people.
joulukk 2 years ago
you didn´t read a lot about cecil rhodes and other british imperialists and their believe of the superiority of the nordic anglo-saxon race
they also established concentration camps in south africa and kenya, slavery for black people in america and destruction of the indians and australians
democracy was thought for their own kind (the white english)
wolke969 2 years ago
"I will not pretend that if I had to choose between Communism and Nazism, I would choose Communism." - Winston Churchill.
For the people who can't decipher a quote Churchill was saying that he would also have chosen Nazism over Communism just like how the German people chose Nazism
IfHeHadLived 2 years ago
That's the basic Reagan-Thatcher phylosophy: transfering all responsibility to the society of what society wants to be. If you loose, you must bear the loss as far as if you win you will enjoy the profits. It´s the ABC of this way of life.
joulukk 2 years ago
Comment removed
joulukk 2 years ago
Free market. A free market puts out bad bankers and uncontrolled financers. Free market is not the bankers, it is a system. Bankers who do their job well succed and bad markets crash and their way out is bankruptcy. The free market regulates itself by putting out the bad bankers. What the State shouldn't do is to help them. Just let them crash and the free market will have done its work by putting them out.
joulukk 2 years ago
that is exactly what the anglo-saxon nations NOT do. They have a tremendous huge financial-industry and services, little industrial production and enormous debts to foreign countries
they save their bancrupt banks and by their subprime junk papers
this could mean for the future that they will be bankrupt or they start a new war
they just need a new reason for it
wolke969 2 years ago
But its values, its language have spread all over the world. That's what matters.
I must say Germany is a beautiful conutry. I have nothing against Germany. It is against Hitler. He was a menace for the Free World.
World is changing, I know that. For example, the United States will be a bilingual country, it has been said that 132million people will speak Spanish in the United States in in 2050.
joulukk 2 years ago
their values?
i hope you don´t mean uncontrolled finance capitalism, war against "terror", tortouring political enemies or self-righteos hypocrisy their political leaders standed recent years
wolke969 2 years ago
Passionate rants and the declaration that an ethnic group has "stolen" Germania...
This sounds VERY familiar... you see, I don't know how your history is, but back in 1939 this chap from Austria, who claimed to be German did something very similar. It ended badly for him.
colonelklink5 2 years ago
I can use democracy, the Hispanic Community of Nations, or whatever you want.
The thing is that Nazis have never been anything, they are nothing important, but a bunch of losers born to be defeated.
joulukk 2 years ago
World War I:
Winners: Anglo-Saxon liberal democracies.
Loser: Germany.
Anglo-Saxon World 1 Germany 0.
World War iI:
Winners: Anglo-Saxon liberal democracies.
Loser: Germany.
Anglo-Saxon World 2 Germany 0.
joulukk 2 years ago
lol ironically using the word Anglo-Saxon implies the descendants of the Angle and the Saxon tribes, both of which were German.... hehe oh the irony...
XXEclipzXX 2 years ago
Yes, but the Anglo-Saxons left their genetic ability to lose unlosable wars (and still try again in a few decade's time) behind in Germany before migrating into Scandinavia, the British Isles and beyond...
colonelklink5 2 years ago
you should visit london or new york, former anglo-saxon cities without anglo-saxons residents
i doubt if the anglo-saxon world at least has won
wolke969 2 years ago 2
I Guerra Mundial:
Ganadores: Democracias liberales anglosajonas.
Perdedor: Alemania.
Mundo anglosajón 1 Alemania 0.
II Guerra Mundial:
Ganadores: Democracias liberales anglosajonas.
Perdedor: Alemania.
Mundo anglosajón 2 Alemania 0.
joulukk 2 years ago
CHURCHILL IS A HEROI LOVE HIM
ngai1842 2 years ago
germany tried to steal the world so shut up
thorney61 2 years ago
lol Elbe, your insane
XXEclipzXX 2 years ago
"I will not pretend that if I had to choose between Communism and Nazism, I would choose Communism." - Winston Churchill, 1937
"An extraordinary man." - neutral Spain's Franco describing Hitler to the Portuguese ambassador
"...now Germany is against the power of evil incarnated in the Anglo-Saxon/Soviet coalition managed by the Jews." - neutral Spain's Luis Blanco writing to Franco with his assessment of Germany's situation right after the USA joined atheist communist Russia in WWII
TheRamJam 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Is that a check for $31billion USD, i see in Winstons pocket???...hmmm
hitide286 3 years ago
We paid every last cent of the USA debt back, with interest. The last payment was made in 2002 completing our obligations and settling the debt completely.
BRITAIN WAS THE ONLY COUNTRY TO THIS BTW.... FRANCE AND GERMANY DEFAULTED ON THERE DEBT TO THE USA
caldwell777 3 years ago
we paid all your money back with intrest and to be honest i dont think we should have, the war involved you hittler was unstopable and he would of captured usa once he gained enough power britan was the only country that had the balls to stand up to him befor he gained enough power to capture half the world and russia only got involved cuz he attacked them and usa got involved cuz japan pulled you in and we won when hittler attacked russia anyway we only needed you to help us do it quicker.
state4lyf2 3 years ago
It was British "bluster" & French pride, that got them into trouble trying to save Poland from Germany. You guys didn't do your homework, were not prepared for a land war with Germany, got your socks knocked off in Europe & kicked off the continent, then cried for help, to drag everyone else in. Churchill was a terrific salesman, and the US bought..Germany to invade the US..LOL how...??
hitide286 3 years ago
@hitide286 Well without a Second front (no need to station large numbers of troops in France) Germany would have probably beaten Russia... and with all the resources of Europe and large parts of Russia and the technological power the Germans had, you really think the USA would have stayed free for long? Thing is WW2 revitialised your country if Hitler had won in Europe and Asia... You would have been fucked with no-one to sell your Tanks and Bullets too!
CptBritish 1 year ago
@CptBritish No Cpt. don't think you are even close with your "therory'" If that was the case why did Stalin constantly pester Rossevelt & Churhill for a second front.?? Germany did not have the resourses/equipment to invade the US . You forget whom Russia was getting alot of her supplies from. The US was the only Allied power to fight two major fronts at the same...We would have nuked Germany first instead of Japan..opps guess you forgot about that..cheers!!!
hitide286 1 year ago
@hitide286 No he was asking for a invasion, There already was a second front, It doesn't matter if that front has a bit of water in the middle! Yes Russia was getting alot of her supplies from you? and? whats that go to do with price of bread. No they didn't have it but they were close to developing it, In twilight of the war they were developing a bomber that could hit New York. Just imagine what they could have got in a few years. You keep your deluded "we are the best!" thoughts and fuck off.
CptBritish 1 year ago
@CptBritish Try growing up a bit ( yes tough act for you)...I NEVER SAID THE USA was the "best" you did, so it seems you are the one with the complex...and you might want to think about going back to school and paying attention this time..Stalin "never wanted" a second front in Europe..you are a fucking retard of the highest level
hitide286 1 year ago
@hitide286 You call me a retard when you can't read you Hill billy fuck. Where did I say "Stalin didn't want a second front" I said he wanted us to invade Europe to take the pressure off them, You were the one that stated there wasn't a second front until the invasion, There was which is way Hilter left as many troop as he did in france! No I don't have a complex I just have a feeling that you are one of the "We saved the world" type of American, or as known to everyone else, Wankers.
CptBritish 1 year ago
@CptBritish hey mon-idiot, were was the second front before June 6,1944??? Now do you start a "second" front without an invasion???? Me thinks you should go back to grammer school to learn the queens "English"
hitide286 1 year ago
@hitide286 Yea there was a front just not a land one... Basically the threat of a invasion was there, so Hitler left soldiers in France which he wouldn't have to do if Britain had been knocked out of the war, Which then could have been used in Russia, also we were bombing Germany before you guys even showed up I'm done with you anyway you obviously only know what Hollywood has said about WW2 anyway so i ain't replying to you anymore.
CptBritish 1 year ago
@CptBritish "they were developing a bomber that could hit New York"
They weren't even close, and it would take more than a long range bomber to win a war, any war. No fool in his right mind would plan an invasion of the United States, it would never succeed. Why do you think Hitler never even considered an invasion of Switzerland.
And hitide is right, we would've nuked Germany first.
THUD086 1 year ago
@THUD086 No they weren't. But they were also at war on two fronts... What I'm trying to say is if we'd been knocked out of the war (Thus allowing Hitler to concentrate all his men and matierals on Russia) they would have won... Britain not been in the War would have been a nightmare situation. Hitler would have the middle east oil fields and beable to take the Persian ones... (Which is what the germans were mainly short of in the latter years)
CptBritish 1 year ago
@CptBritish Hitlers big gamble was to take the lucrative oil fields of Russia in Barbarossa, not the oil fields in the Middle East, he had no merchant marine to transport that oil. Whatever oil Hitler would get, would have to come over land, not the sea, the RN controlled the waters going into Germany.
You're speculating on the situation without the U.K. in the war. Hitler still wasn't prepared to fight a winter war in Russia, regardless, history has taught us that.
THUD086 1 year ago
@THUD086 I'm not saying that the Germans would have been able to invade in like 1945, in the 1950s or 60s? yea i think they could have, No a Bomber wouldn't have done it on its own, The Allies bombing of Germany proved that, I was just using it as an example of what they were coming up with, Hitler was a complete twat but his scientists were Brilliant, and how would you nuke Germany without the UK as a base? and the Luffewaffe between the US and Germany?
CptBritish 1 year ago
@CptBritish The U.S. just didn't sit back and play dead, we produced the A-bomb before Germany ever could (Germany never got past R&D).
And as far as a base of operations, don't forget, Stalin was at war with Hitler also, and no doubt he would've given us access to Germany with the long range B-29.
In 1942, we sailed an amphibious assault from U.S. ports, right into No. Africa. Didn't need the U.K. for that.
We find ways, we're pretty good at those things.
THUD086 1 year ago
@CptBritish Talk about your knowledge of history twat?? How would the US bomb Germany without England, you moron, the same way we bombed Toyko , they are called aircraft carriers you nim-rod..Hitler could'nt plan an invasion across the channel, so how was he going to go 3,500 miles..also from Greenland by 1944 US B-29's could have made the round trip flight..opps forgot the RAF did'nt have any long-range bombers of that calibre...
hitide286 1 year ago
Comment removed
THUD086 1 year ago
@CptBritish Let me remind you of what Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto once stated: "I would never plan an invasion of America,,,there's a gun behind every blade of grass".
He knew the U.S. culture very well, he went to college here. Do you remember me bringing up Switzerland a while ago? Hitler wouldn't even think of going into that country, because like the U.S.,he'd be fighting an armed population.
He couldn't invade the U.S in WW2, nor the 50's or 60's. You're dreaming, lad.
THUD086 1 year ago
State4:
Go goggle 'England repaid its lend-lease loan", then get back to me. The ORIGINNAL amount was $31billion USD, what was "paid back"...and there where 6 years in which England paid nothing , that's why it took so long to pay off, the 10% of the loan at 2% interest, not a bad deal.!!!..the US taxpayer got left withe balance
hitide286 3 years ago
I am so sick of ppl who would not get a set of balls if one were presented to them by great men shitting on those that do. Great men stand up when all else sit down and avoid eye contact, Great men do what must be done and small men will always bitch in hopes of hiding there own cowardliness. Stand up o you great men under the same God Winston Churchill did and win your victory for once again terrorism is upon us......
Larsoveli 3 years ago 3
Rest my friend we are.. Save your breath though there are fools, your not one of them it seems. Prepare and act when grieve may come. But never give up hope.
herencia21 2 years ago 2
A GREAT war leader. As a peace leader he was fairly inadequate, but he was our saviour at the deadliest point.
You may notice not a hint of gloating, of false modesty, or of self-praise. That is the true British spirit, and will live on while British hearts endure, in whatever colour skin they are encased.
God sent Churchill to save us in our darkest hour - praise Him and bless Churchill's memory! Advance Britannia!
curvalecce 3 years ago 4
and advance brazil!!!! he was the greatest leader!
marcelomixira 3 years ago
I absolutely second that!advance indeed.
moonchildofthedark 3 years ago
Be good in life dont get sucked into the evil that is being subordinate to your ambitions.
RoyBolinggoing 3 years ago
I wish America would get more back on track with what its allies want. This was a time when America, The UK, and Free Europe stood together for freedom and democracy. I wish we could stand together again, what we ought to do is end Iraq ASAP and start working on building democracy in Afghanistan. If we work together there I'm sure we can be successful.However, first I think my country ought to start giving more respect to the nations of Europe, after all we have so much common history.
Aurileus5 3 years ago
ADVANCE BRITTANIA!
MemphisTC 3 years ago
He is the difinitive statesman.........of which all others will be compared
sanddemon51 3 years ago 3
britain never beaten never surrender ,NEVER NEVER NEVER give in!
british pride
slamminjammin87 3 years ago 7
What a speech, and what a relief it must have been to have 6 years of hell behind you. Winston Churchill is without a doubt one of the great "bad asses" of all time!!
nyr1994 3 years ago 11
What a leader
gangman46 3 years ago 3
I can forgive him for that.
bangersnmash4me 3 years ago
And Winston was half American...
Bobbyo60 3 years ago
Winston Churchill is awesome. The only thing that bugs me about him is that he was a bit of an imperialist. Especially when it came to Indian independence. Still, a man of singular vision, and an amazing leader. A hero to all the allied nations.
Aurileus5 3 years ago 3
nothing wrong with being an imperialist old boy! aurileuu5! nothing wrong with that at all.
Sir Winston churchill surley he must be the greatest man of the past century.
MemphisTC 3 years ago 2
er no because we dont have an empire and are not as strong as before so he wouldnt, british have gone soft? behave son u certainly aint a London lad ra ya!
shokq1 3 years ago
If this guy was alive, he would have Iran bombed tomorow. The British people have become soft.
TeamCrusade 3 years ago 6
It amuses me that Churchill is held up as an icon by the American right wing. He may have been an inspiration war leader, but his domestic policies after the War were very centrist (and he spent his first period in high office in the Liberal Party, where he helped to create the British welfare state).
caeruleastar 3 years ago
You are absolutley right, privatly he even referd to USA as -the colonys. Alltough it was with a great sence og humor I guess.
StantheGunman 3 years ago
Not all of us are soft! just those bloody politicians!
MemphisTC 3 years ago
Legend!
Rugbymad1981 3 years ago
If he was a dublin dude he would be called a rebel
BlueSkyAtMidnight 3 years ago
Where is the "never in the field of human conflict" speech? The Few...
toobiest 3 years ago
Churchill is my British hero. He had done much for Britain. Victory!!!
Corridoamor 3 years ago 3
Hitler is also one of the greatest politicians to ever have lived...i don't say i support what nazism and Hitler stood for, but he had remarkable speeches!
his tactics however was a failiure, and though he was a cunning man, he sure was a bastard...but remember, bastards and evil persons are humans too..that Hitler lost proves that he wasn't perfect and a human too :) you watch the news about an "evil" killer, but fails to mension that the same person perhaps is a good husband and a caring dad
Hasselberg666 3 years ago
I am always amazed at the intense stupidity that shows up on these comments. Hitler Married Eva Braun one day before they committed suicide. He had no children, but there is record of him sexually abusing a young female relative.
It is true that he had an evil, almost hypnotic effect on Germany, and that he continues to appeal to perverted white supremacists and other monsters, it is a terrible perversion of history to attempt to "humanize" this monster.
spin12 3 years ago 2
Hasselberg is right, man. Hitler was a political genius. How else could someone sell such evil schemes to otherwise good people? It doesn't mean what he did was right, nor that anyone admires the man himself; it just means you're calling a spade a spade: Hitler was a political genius AND the most ruthless and evil mass-murderer probably in the history of the world.
Trevormark 3 years ago 2
Churchill called him a maniac of terrifying genius.
Mousepie999 3 years ago
"Hitled might have been a good husband and a caring dad".
I bet he wouldn't have adopted a Zambian child though...
toobiest 3 years ago
Hitler was one of the greatest at politics. I wouldn't say he was the greatest politician. To be the greatest you have to also be moral. Hitler was the most evil man who ever lived. A good politician must also be a good man. And Hitler was definitely not, while Churchill was for the most part a VERY Righteous MAN.
Aurileus5 3 years ago
If hitler would have let the Jews live during WWII, he would have probably won, Jews could have been good fighters, 6 million jews dead? 6 million extra troops! (I'm not an anti Jew.) Was just thinking.
God Save The Queen, and God Bless America.
roketjack 3 years ago
but a lot of those Jews were from countries that he had invaded and conquered. i somehow doubt they would be willing to fight for him.
ichigonnopowder 3 years ago
Sounds like you are talking about Obama.
b5kalad 3 years ago 3
nice
WilRandal 3 years ago
GREAT
caldwell777 3 years ago
Churchill is one the greatest politicians to have ever lived.
LordShadrach 3 years ago 3
"Advance Britannia! Long Live the Cause of Freedom! God Save the King!"
easyplex 3 years ago 6
No: in my opinion he IS the greatest politician who ever lived
Taylorboast4 3 years ago 4