Oh dear oh dear what is this guy talking about? They are pieces of debris out of focus, and the reason they seen to pass behind is because the tether is over exposed. What a silly sausage.
Years ago, after a night out, I went to the terrace of my house. The glare of the sun was rising on the horizon, but still saw stars in the sky. When I looked in the direction of dawn I saw this cigar-shaped object, very bright and floating quietly. What caught my attention - besides the glow - it was his size. I said to myself "Wait a minute! This object is positioned after the more distant clouds I can see in the sky!" I woke up my parents and sisters and brother and everydoy could see it.
Can someone explain why the tether isn't to scale? If it were 12miles long, yet 1/10 cm thick, surely it would be so thin at that distance as to be invisible?? Whereas if the length of the tether is actually correct, then the width relative to the length looks like it must be about 0.4 miles???!!!
@jammydodgers1000 exactly, the tether is 2.54mm in diameter but on the video it looks like it's about 1 mile wide LOL. And yet many people say "2 miles wide UFOs" .. They should make a new NASA conspiracy "NASA lies about the tether width-diameter" lol. UFO believers don't even take it into account, they just concentrate on the flying object (debris imo). Everything here is out of focus. The camera "C" that filmed this had problem with the focus.
@sebastiansz I asked the friend who showed me this video the same question, his response was that the tether appeared so wide because of the spread of uv light radiating from it. In which case the same theory would apply to the 'ufos'/(dust motes around the lens?) and they too would actually be tiny and not these massive spaceships! I'm no scientist but it's basic logic and this video is comedy. The believers just see what they want to see..a case of the Emperors new clothes me thinks!
Sereda, i'm glad your fame was short-lived, and that you have been revealed for the charlatan you 'were'. I say 'were' because you're now only famous for being a fraudulent laughing stock. I sincerely hope you didn't make much money from exploiting gullible fools on the internet!
@MoronAntidote Hi, what ever you think about Sereda it is your opinion, myself I am not his devotee either. He has done many things in UFO field which I don’t like. Nevertheless this is original NASA footage and somebody in this organization wanted us to see that.
For Sereda’s credit in this particular case he made some valuable observations. Greetings BJ
TBH i can't think of a single 'valuable' observation he made in relation to this footage. All of his so-called observations are easily dismissed as pure fiction.
z ta miara tego tether'a ktory ma 12 mil dlugosci.. tak on ma tyle. ale przeciez ten tether nie koniecznie ułozył sie niczym np. sznurek polozony na ziemie idealnie przed kamera... mogl byc wzgledem kamery pod innym kątem i tak pokazywac sie jako prosta linia. No i nastepnie, czemu kazdy z tym spodków/UFO jest pokazany idealnie jako okrągły. Jak wiemy w kosmoscie nie na góra, dół... kazdy z nich jest odwrócony idealnie do kamery, nigdy pod innym kątem.
If there were things 2 or 3 miles wide flying around in near earth space you would see them everytime you looked up... The objects clearly aren't solid as you can see through them. I think this is an optical illusion caused by the zoom of the camera.
@mintwithahole I think you should watch video, presentation of Bob Dean from Barcelona 2009. Please go to my website exopolitics(dot) pl and in the media on the home page, there is a link to video I am talking about, please see “part 4” but of course you can also say this is a optical illusion recorded on official NASA negatives. Greetings BJ
@mintwithahole I think you should watch video, presentation of Bob Dean from Barcelona 2009. Please go to my website exopolitics (address is on my channel) and in the media on the home page, there is a link to video I am talking about, please see “part 4” but of course you can also say this is a optical illusion recorded on official NASA negatives. Greetings BJ
@sebastiansz i dont know mate but they are only visable with an ultraviolet camara and other sometimes infrared. David sereda's theroy is that the objects are in a high energy state (higher frequecy) funnily enough this would boycot einseins theory that nothing with mass can reach light speed. Its all very interesting for sure.
@sebastiansz ye its no secret about the equipment mate you can find the info anywhere really, any nasa / space enthusiast can tell u about the equipment may even be on nasa site somewhere. I cant say details about the equipment but i know its the black n white low light camaras that are the ones that see into ultra violet.
@mintwithahole I think you are missing the point. You wouldn't necessarily see them with the naked eye unless they were currently in our visual spectrum. The fact is they operate in more than our 3 dimensions. Science has detected up to 30 dimensions, so far.... Have a coffee, do some research
ooo...widzę ,że ktoś w końcu przetłumaczył Davida :)
jak dla mnie to koleś ma jak dotąd najbardziej trafne wytłumaczenie i dowody na ufo - oczywiście ,że są pewne sprzeczne kwestie ale ogólnie mówiąc DOBRA ROBOTA DAVID !
Oh dear oh dear what is this guy talking about? They are pieces of debris out of focus, and the reason they seen to pass behind is because the tether is over exposed. What a silly sausage.
n1pperash 1 month ago
And if the tethered object is a disc from a perpendicular perspective, uh'?
Manuipe 6 months ago
Years ago, after a night out, I went to the terrace of my house. The glare of the sun was rising on the horizon, but still saw stars in the sky. When I looked in the direction of dawn I saw this cigar-shaped object, very bright and floating quietly. What caught my attention - besides the glow - it was his size. I said to myself "Wait a minute! This object is positioned after the more distant clouds I can see in the sky!" I woke up my parents and sisters and brother and everydoy could see it.
Manuipe 6 months ago
David Sereda's an imbecile.
Wruff 6 months ago
video and audio
sha370z 6 months ago
watch?v=opiaznxF-B8&feature=related
SunTzu1983 6 months ago
hmmmm debatable....
MrMilfhunter2003 7 months ago
Can someone explain why the tether isn't to scale? If it were 12miles long, yet 1/10 cm thick, surely it would be so thin at that distance as to be invisible?? Whereas if the length of the tether is actually correct, then the width relative to the length looks like it must be about 0.4 miles???!!!
jammydodgers1000 9 months ago
@jammydodgers1000 exactly, the tether is 2.54mm in diameter but on the video it looks like it's about 1 mile wide LOL. And yet many people say "2 miles wide UFOs" .. They should make a new NASA conspiracy "NASA lies about the tether width-diameter" lol. UFO believers don't even take it into account, they just concentrate on the flying object (debris imo). Everything here is out of focus. The camera "C" that filmed this had problem with the focus.
sebastiansz 8 months ago
@sebastiansz I asked the friend who showed me this video the same question, his response was that the tether appeared so wide because of the spread of uv light radiating from it. In which case the same theory would apply to the 'ufos'/(dust motes around the lens?) and they too would actually be tiny and not these massive spaceships! I'm no scientist but it's basic logic and this video is comedy. The believers just see what they want to see..a case of the Emperors new clothes me thinks!
jammydodgers1000 8 months ago
@jammydodgers1000
It's not a UV camera, it's an SIT Vidicon CCTV camera (part of Sereda's disinformation). I have footage of the UV camera. btw.
You're right about the rest though.
MoronAntidote 6 months ago
Biggest load of shit ever.
Sereda, i'm glad your fame was short-lived, and that you have been revealed for the charlatan you 'were'. I say 'were' because you're now only famous for being a fraudulent laughing stock. I sincerely hope you didn't make much money from exploiting gullible fools on the internet!
MoronAntidote 9 months ago
@MoronAntidote Hi, what ever you think about Sereda it is your opinion, myself I am not his devotee either. He has done many things in UFO field which I don’t like. Nevertheless this is original NASA footage and somebody in this organization wanted us to see that.
For Sereda’s credit in this particular case he made some valuable observations. Greetings BJ
questdental 9 months ago
@questdental
Like what? There is barely anything about his account that stands up to scrutiny. He's wrong on so many levels it's laughable.
MoronAntidote 6 months ago
@questdental
TBH i can't think of a single 'valuable' observation he made in relation to this footage. All of his so-called observations are easily dismissed as pure fiction.
MoronAntidote 5 months ago
z ta miara tego tether'a ktory ma 12 mil dlugosci.. tak on ma tyle. ale przeciez ten tether nie koniecznie ułozył sie niczym np. sznurek polozony na ziemie idealnie przed kamera... mogl byc wzgledem kamery pod innym kątem i tak pokazywac sie jako prosta linia. No i nastepnie, czemu kazdy z tym spodków/UFO jest pokazany idealnie jako okrągły. Jak wiemy w kosmoscie nie na góra, dół... kazdy z nich jest odwrócony idealnie do kamery, nigdy pod innym kątem.
sebastiansz 1 year ago
If there were things 2 or 3 miles wide flying around in near earth space you would see them everytime you looked up... The objects clearly aren't solid as you can see through them. I think this is an optical illusion caused by the zoom of the camera.
mintwithahole 1 year ago
@mintwithahole I think you should watch video, presentation of Bob Dean from Barcelona 2009. Please go to my website exopolitics(dot) pl and in the media on the home page, there is a link to video I am talking about, please see “part 4” but of course you can also say this is a optical illusion recorded on official NASA negatives. Greetings BJ
questdental 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@questdental I'll take you up on that and check it out... Cheers.
mintwithahole 1 year ago
@mintwithahole I think you should watch video, presentation of Bob Dean from Barcelona 2009. Please go to my website exopolitics (address is on my channel) and in the media on the home page, there is a link to video I am talking about, please see “part 4” but of course you can also say this is a optical illusion recorded on official NASA negatives. Greetings BJ
questdental 1 year ago
@mintwithahole unless your eyes can see the infrared and ultaviolate spectrum of light u can see them.
galaxything 1 year ago
@galaxything why infrared and ultaviolate spectrum of light?
sebastiansz 1 year ago
@sebastiansz i dont know mate but they are only visable with an ultraviolet camara and other sometimes infrared. David sereda's theroy is that the objects are in a high energy state (higher frequecy) funnily enough this would boycot einseins theory that nothing with mass can reach light speed. Its all very interesting for sure.
galaxything 1 year ago
@galaxything hm, are you trying to tell me that they used the "TOP" camera to record this?
sebastiansz 1 year ago
@sebastiansz dunno bout "top camara" but these camaras see into near ultra violet ye
galaxything 1 year ago
@galaxything ok, how do you know that, can you proviade any URLs? thanks
sebastiansz 1 year ago
@sebastiansz ye its no secret about the equipment mate you can find the info anywhere really, any nasa / space enthusiast can tell u about the equipment may even be on nasa site somewhere. I cant say details about the equipment but i know its the black n white low light camaras that are the ones that see into ultra violet.
galaxything 1 year ago
@mintwithahole I think you are missing the point. You wouldn't necessarily see them with the naked eye unless they were currently in our visual spectrum. The fact is they operate in more than our 3 dimensions. Science has detected up to 30 dimensions, so far.... Have a coffee, do some research
phuturephunk01 2 weeks ago
a gdzie to tłumaczenie ja się ciebie pytam
zmirek1 1 year ago
ooo...widzę ,że ktoś w końcu przetłumaczył Davida :)
jak dla mnie to koleś ma jak dotąd najbardziej trafne wytłumaczenie i dowody na ufo - oczywiście ,że są pewne sprzeczne kwestie ale ogólnie mówiąc DOBRA ROBOTA DAVID !
jutjuber1able 1 year ago