Hey I have question about wave frequency of an object.
for example we have 5 meter long wooden stick which is vibrating on frequency of 50mhz. If we change frequency of that wooden stick's some part, lets say 1 meter left part and set its frequency to 100mhz, does this will change whole wooden sticks frequency?
I just want to find out my thouts if they are true about objects waves.
Tom Bearden is the greatest scientific gadfly on the planet. Even people like Michio Kaku now admit the textbooks are wrong & cite the work done at Duke University & CalTech to bend light in the lab. Bearden's main point is that corporations have a vested interest in the old science & universities have become the whores of Babylon by creating a secular inquisition to keep out the new models that would pull the plug on all existing forms of energy advocated by either the right or the left.
We have a huge problem: Corporate control of innovation. Cures for cancer and AIDS have already been found, tested - and when they worked the patents were bought and programs defunded. Same with energy. The corporations/banks make lots of money selling you drugs that make you sicker, and selling you power from fossil fuels, and selling you wars they created for profits. Imagine a world in which great innovative ideas for the betterment of humanity are encouraged and allowed to flourish. Imagine!
That was quite a leap you just made at the end. I don't think you could be more mistaken - ie, I would bet the opposite: that the global warming adherents are in high positions in government and influential organizations in the western world.
By "global warming", I take it you mean "anthropogenic global warming" and in turn, by AGW, you mean "AGW causes the problem". And THAT is the current scientific dogma. When in fact, there is a lot of evidence to the contrary and scientists opposed.
I like this guy! Finally someone that's up to speed. This is highly intelligent programing. As long as I can keep finding things like this, I'll never go back to TV to desperately hope to find something that's even remotely interesting.
This has been flagged as spam show
Your video is a favorite on Belgium
perryhanson1128 5 days ago
Your vid is popular on Jordan
jacquesgambl36 3 weeks ago
Just show your MEG generator working, more showing less talking Tom Bearden
ssslawek 2 months ago
Hey I have question about wave frequency of an object.
for example we have 5 meter long wooden stick which is vibrating on frequency of 50mhz. If we change frequency of that wooden stick's some part, lets say 1 meter left part and set its frequency to 100mhz, does this will change whole wooden sticks frequency?
I just want to find out my thouts if they are true about objects waves.
gioperc 1 year ago
Tom Bearden is the greatest scientific gadfly on the planet. Even people like Michio Kaku now admit the textbooks are wrong & cite the work done at Duke University & CalTech to bend light in the lab. Bearden's main point is that corporations have a vested interest in the old science & universities have become the whores of Babylon by creating a secular inquisition to keep out the new models that would pull the plug on all existing forms of energy advocated by either the right or the left.
bondurango 3 years ago 17
We have a huge problem: Corporate control of innovation. Cures for cancer and AIDS have already been found, tested - and when they worked the patents were bought and programs defunded. Same with energy. The corporations/banks make lots of money selling you drugs that make you sicker, and selling you power from fossil fuels, and selling you wars they created for profits. Imagine a world in which great innovative ideas for the betterment of humanity are encouraged and allowed to flourish. Imagine!
immayhem 2 years ago 7
Amen.
bondurango 2 years ago 4
non-Abelion = non-communitive
quaternions are a superset of complex numbers - 1 real(time), 3 (quasi?) imaginary (space) they follow all normal math rules except commutivity.
Non-Abelian quasiparticles are hypothesized to be stable enough to create quantum computers.
Creepy scientists: I'll bet global warming deniers are in high positions in American government.
newbetterandhappy 3 years ago
That was quite a leap you just made at the end. I don't think you could be more mistaken - ie, I would bet the opposite: that the global warming adherents are in high positions in government and influential organizations in the western world.
By "global warming", I take it you mean "anthropogenic global warming" and in turn, by AGW, you mean "AGW causes the problem". And THAT is the current scientific dogma. When in fact, there is a lot of evidence to the contrary and scientists opposed.
Terry5135 2 years ago
I like this guy! Finally someone that's up to speed. This is highly intelligent programing. As long as I can keep finding things like this, I'll never go back to TV to desperately hope to find something that's even remotely interesting.
FiniteTuning 3 years ago 11
love the clips, but where the heck is 6/8???
skidbone 4 years ago
go back to clip 1, it is in the related vids,
CTR831 2 years ago
@skidbone
its somewhere in space time between part 5 and 7 but dont be fooled by part 5 which is text as part 4 must be a quantum anomaly?
westsussexguy 10 months ago