Added: 3 years ago
From: motortrend
Views: 78,114
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (152)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WOW 5 turbocharged, 2 supercharged........and 1 N/A........poor civic

  • hey man, if you dont want your job, ill gladly take it

  • motor trend you suck balls

  • I'd take the RalliArt, Speed3, and GTI. Yeah get a new host...snore.

  • could there be a guy less suited to presenting? jeeeeeez

  • I would buy the Ralliart in 2 shakes of a strippers ass if it came with the option of a manual

  • my goodness...act excited about your job jeez I sure would. His voice puts me to sleep ugh :(

  • Writer does not translate into good narrator... sheesh.

  • After hearing him talk, I almost fell asleep..

  • no ser spec v? damn, thats one of the best n/a fwd cars built.

  • @NissanTy hahahaha they drive like a truck

  • @ivajlkvd not hardly

  • @NissanTy Yeah they do big guy, i work at a car auction and i have driven all years of them. 04 was the worst of the bunch, but the newer ones aren't a whole lot better.

  • Why not the SS coupe turbo?the xrs sucks too bad, thats why they didnt include it.

  • 4.8 sec to 60? did they get a wrx sti and think it was a wrx?

  • Honda is the most boring car and Calibre is just plain ugly. GTI, WRX and Speed3 are the only choices here. Oh, and that guy sucks with a mic. WTF? At least give some hot girl the mic in a bikini and problem solved.

  • Too bad the Ford was too dumb to sell the RS in the USA. :P It would have pwned.

  • SE-R spec v?

  • They forgot to include the XRS!!

  • this host sucks

  • 0:20 are you allowed to take footage from top gear? o.o

  • I could do a much better job hosting this segment. This guy just made me skip to another video...he's boring.

  • @Seadgaranovic are you saying it got the best 0-60 because its awd?

    wouldnt awd make it slower , take more power to power the 4 wheels?

  • no way, dear motortrend.

    4.8 to 60...... holy cow, 0.2 of a second slower than the STi.

    WTF?!

  • @qwertza124345 Some testers actually get the WRX a faster 0-60 time than the STi.

  • @carsaregood911 Hows that? Isn't the STI almost 100hp more

  • @Cripton805 Not 100 BHP more, around 40 BHP more. I guess they found the WRX easier to launch. Not sure though

  • @carsaregood911 Ok? I thought the regular Impreza or WRX was at 210hp is and the STI at 280hp. You know that WRX isn't putting 200hp at the wheels and neither is the STi, but I think its more than 40

  • @Cripton805 I wasn't talking about the wheels, I was talking about the power at the crank. The WRX is 265 and the STI is 305 BHP.

  • @carsaregood911 I didn't know that. I thought it was 210

  • @Cripton805 Guess you learned something new :)

  • @carsaregood911 4 sure. Thx

  • @zznwea LMAO!!!!!! good one.

  • the srt-4 always makes me laugh ppl overrate it waayy too much there's a kid in my town that has one and only because it is now stage 2 he thinks he has a lamborghini hehe I still smoke that fatass car with my 200 000km+ RSX (non type s) on the 1/4 mile because he can't take off without making clouds of smoke

  • god damnit!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what the fuck is wrong with ur narrorators/host they are so fuckin boring. i mean they got a job working with cars and they arent even the slightest excited. fire his ass and hire sum1 with enthusiasm

  • As usual, one needs to drive the cars before making any decision. Some magazine editors aren't the ones to listen to. I wish the Cobalt SS sedan had't died so soon. I never got to drive one.

  • this guy needs to get laid

  • How? They are the slower cars in the camparison. GTI's are for fags and the Lancer has like 235 HP so it probably only makes like 190 at the wheels. The SS has the best numbers which is what I car about.

  • this guy sounds like a fucking robot

  • Lancer, Impreza and GTI are the best =D and the mazda

  • LOL GTI and Lancer? Those are the worst cars probably

  • @ATLBraves1992 Would you have the plastic on wheels chevy or dodge ?

  • @evo271 Id rather have a car than a mini van lol

  • @ATLBraves1992 youre an idiot. you dont know anything about cars.

  • GTI

  • Wait, Clubman? Why the hell would you bring a limo mini? That guy clearly doesn't want the Brits to win.

  • What other brit compacts are there? BMW makes Mini anyway.

  • cobalt! What a piece of SHIT!

  • Wow that dosge caliber is one sweet car!!! ROFL !!!! WTF my moms minivan has more acceleration!

  • 1 thing this test fails to realize: no one in their right mind would buy a mini clubman. That car shouldn't even be included.

  • impreza! :D

  • the mazda speed 3, imprezza, cobalt, and gti are best one's on the list. the civic sucks now. there so slow compared to the Rsx type S

  • @SAtownZ28, HAHA!!! words can not describe how fucking stupid that comment is. did you know that the si has the exact same engine as the type s? and it is quicker off the line because of LSD. i know you commented this a while ago, but it was just too stupid to pass up.

  • its possible for 2 cars to have the same engine & there be performance diffs. my sister has a 09 Civic SI. my brother in laws friend has a stock RSX type S & with my brother in law driving the SI its still slower the the RSX. and no bullshit about him not knowing how to drive because he is alot better than most drivers i have seen. so you can go and keep on getting your info out of car magazines. so please tell me what you are going to pull out of your ass.

  • Lol... Pull what out of my ass! I dont need a magazine or web source to explain that they are the SAME FUCKING CAR! Ever heard the phrase, "acura is just honda in a tux." same horsepower, same torque, same power/weight ratio. Just search some races between the two cars. You will find the si wins more often than not. This is 100% drivers race

  • Why would you test an old rsx in this comparison. The si is the same car just newer

  • well then i guess the SI drivers that i see at car meets i go to suck balls because i see typeS's spank them all night.

  • ever heard of modding a car? i can guarantee that there are far more modded rsx's than si's. every single 8th gen si is still on warranty unless they have been modded. rsx's are now coming out of warranty because they are a little older. Meaning the only thing holding someone back from modding their car is the cost to do it. They no longer have to worry about voiding their warranty. if somebody mods their si they would be voiding their warranty, and most people dont want to risk that

  • most of the races between the SI's & TypeS's are bolton vs Bolton. i can see what your saying but in 02 they had review of both the SS Camaro & Firehawk firebird. they have had the same powertrain since 98. nothing different. they both even had the same suspension upgrade option that the factory offered. the Firehawk ended up being faster. so thats why i said you can have the same powertrain in 2 cars but 1 being faster.

  • Thats when it comes down to weight my friend. Most muscle car people dont really care much about how much their car weighs, but as little as 20 lbs can affect the time of the car by 1/10th of a second. The thing is, the si and rsx weigh practically the same. (2787 rsx, 2800 si) im assuming one weighed more than the other. (not gonna take the time to look it up)

  • the firehawk is 3,440lbs and the SS is 3,440lbs. they weight the same

  • huh thats wierd... but just make sure to look around at other vids, si's will win a good amount of the time.

  • i dont mean like a whole second faster but 2 at most 3 tenths of a second faster.

  • an rsx that goes to a track is most definately modded, and is 100% the reason you see them win more often. for under 1000, you can get intake, headers, and exaust, which can bring the rsx's (and si's) 1/4 mile time from high 14's, to middle 13's... which is good enough to beat a new mustang gt. minor mods make the difference for sport compacts

  • civic is good for its money..cause its so fucking cheap..but civic is generally a shithole car

  • your ranking should be

    1.wrx- fast as hell

    2.mazdaspeed3/cobaltss-refined­, great handling, practicality, tonsotorque

    3.mazdaspeed3/cobaltss-lots of power, fastest fwd car round the nurburgring, bluetooth standard

    4.gti-refined, decent power, great handling, fun

    5.clubman-amazing handling, too expensive

    6.ralliart-needs better tires, too expensive, too slow for price

    7.civic-refined, practical, not enough power, handling is decent, fun

    8.caliber-tons of power but cant put it to the road well

  • i agree, except for i hate the look of the new wrx

  • I thought that they would have had a scion tc

  • @AKPaintballer9 scion tc is not a sport compact. it doesn't have a sport tuned suspension and doesn't have near as much horsepower as these cars.

  • Mazda Speed 3= 241whp

    Cobalt SS/TC=241whp

    Lancer Evo=241whp

    Sti=241whp

    So wait I ge to pay around 15k more for all wheel drive? Sign me up with the FWD!

  • this ISN'T the STI dude...it's the standard WRX

  • Even better then let me correct myself

    Mazda Speed 3= 241whp

    Cobalt SS/TC=241whp

    Lancer Evo=241whp

    Sti=241whp

    Wrx=215whp.

  • ya cause the sti has more hp than the wrx

  • 09 wrx is faster than the 07 and lower sti's if the driver is good...... and it was the fastest between those cars in the video !

  • yur a turd...you have 2 cars wrong..the mitsu is a ralliart not an evo..and the subaru is a wrx not an sti...so no yur not paying 15k more

  • No your the turd I wasn't talking about the cars in the video I was comparing my cobalts hp to the 40k sti and evo mr's you imbecile,tho rs's and regular wrx arent too impressive either all they got is awd what are you gonna do go offroading with that? Keep ur awd ill just throw on slicks and I should be just as fast if not faster. Case closed buddy!

  • wow this kind of ignorance would come from a chevy owner. throw some full slicks on and snap axles. fwd can not hook like awd.

  • stock cobalt ss runs low 14's..stock wrx's run low 13's..for about $1500 more i'll take a faster, better built, more equiped, and better looking car, not some slowbalt that every 16 year old girl wants.

  • the stock ss runs 13.6 in a quarter its on youtube look it up,so far havent seen a stock wrx run low 13s hmm...

  • the old cobalt does suck but the new 09 cobalt... omg its a sexy beast. Idk wat ur saying that the cobalt doesnt look good the only word to discribe it is sexy, i really dont like the subaru that much it looks and feels so technical the cobalt is a way more relaxing car to drive.

  • GTi ... the best.

  • woooot WRX!!

  • Ron Kiino sucks...his voice makes me want to pull a double-van Gogh. That Subaru is ugly, but it still performs. In the 'great white north' there is no AWD contender in this market segment. It's practical, reliable and fun to drive.

  • Yes there is! The Lancer Ralliart has AWD too.

  • Touche....I still wouldn't consider that a contender, though.

  • Why isn't it a contender?

  • Just watch the three parts of this comparison. The Mitsu doesn't do anything particularly well and the Subaru does.

  • Christ, what was Subaru thinking when they made this new look for the impreza? It's so hideous. And it sucks even more that the STI only comes in the 5 door wagon. The last two models looked way better

  • sooo monotone....

    more mini plz

  • host... meh

    cars... yeh

  • put the evo insted of ralliart and the end result will change.

  • than your in a whole diff price range put the 10k diff in price in any of these cars and it will smoke a evo but dont get me wrong i love evos

  • Mitsubishi's pricing is pretty terrible these days. With the WRX, Cobalt SS, and MS3 available, I can't see any reason for buying a Ralliart. Even when one does move up to the Evo, it still can't pull away from the Cobalt SS on the track.

  • he cant be any worse than the guy at C/D...

  • The host is so borrrrrringgg...Motor Trend fire his ass off.

  • @Defcon5Es hahahaha 

  • the host sucks!

  • I think the Colbalt will win.

  • i'd buy the vw straight up.

  • cobalt styling...wait a minute..what styling? lol...they slacked BIG TIME on styling,quality, and interior materials on the cobalt...GRR...id rather to roll with a civic Si or a subaru wrx.

  • I'd take the sleeper look any day. The extra cash left in my pocket would be nice as well. Then you can buy some nicer seats and dash cover if you're so offended. Civics are hideous and it's not like a WRX has a terrible nice interior.

  • in person the the civic si looks sharper then the cobalt ss....the cobalt looks kinda bloated like a fat pig lol....but to each his own...they are both fun!

  • I just hate the back on the Civics.... thats why i went for a RSX Type S ^^

  • cant go wrong with that..ive been in a type s...thing seriously hauls

  • Unless you're living in the '70s, Civics are anything but hideous.

  • subaru

  • the announcer has way too less energy i cant pay attention.

  • si for the win

  • if i had to choose i wood choose the Subaru...but if the Mitsubishi was the higher end one i woodave picked that instead

  • He sounds like he swallowed a cup full of cum and ass

  • y does he sound like death?

  • AHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhh.... Your voice is killing my earrrrrrs!!!! Can you try to be MORE monotone next time? sheesh.

  • comparison sucked way to short not enough about the cars

  • GTI OR DIE

  • how much did subaru pay him to say that

  • 4.8 to 60 in a stock wrx....bullshit

  • downhill

  • new cars are ugly! go old skool!!!

  • how can a cobalt ss with semi-independent torsion bar do better than a GTI on the skid pad?

  • the cobalt for some reason it totally amazing at everything for the price. quality is down but for all out performance for the money it is the best.

  • 4.8s not to 60mph, come on

  • theres no way a base wrx posted those times

  • The SI and Caliber will not even stand a chance, the top three will be mazdaspeed3, WRX and SS, not in that order, each has it's better spots.

  • the GTI won..... i was hoping that it would one of those that you've mentioned.

  • wheres the rest of it lol

  • I don't think it's actually possible to talk more boringly than this guy just did...

  • Nissan Sentra SE-R?

  • idk if its my speakers...but, this dude sounds so weird.

  • The Dodge Caliber will get SPANKED

  • definitely the wrx and gti

  • they shoulda got the 2 door cobalt ss. i bet the srt4 is gonna suck. dodge shouldve kept the neon srt4 and never made the caliber one

  • Can we have a more mundane commentator?

  • Hey man, he's talking about racing cobalt's i wouldn't be that pumped either when everyone else gets to watch GTR burnouts.

  • true, but i was just commenting on his voice. EIther way I still like these comparisons though.

  • Mazdaspeed 3.

  • of course the WRX is going to win this...most of the other cars suck!i mean dodge caliber and chevy cobalt? come on!

  • Colbalt is a Front wheel drive car and made a nurburgring time somewhere in the 7 minute range. Cobalt is a very fast, fair priced, reliable car.

  • ya its a fast car for FWD.. reliable i dont know about that...I'm just saying against the WRX its not that much of a comparison at least not to me thats just my opinion

  • it was close!

  • and actually it was a 8:22 on the nurburgring

  • First...can't wait for the results of this testing.

  • It's out already on the website.

  • well shit on a stick...I better step my game up.

  • view 1 bitch nothing special god im lame sti evo gti rule

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more