When people are talking about graphics, you all do know that the Dreamcast's graphics system is actually 2x more powerful than the PS2. If the DC stayed for even 3 more years, look at how great the games would look!
@PIKACHU49386 True, since the PS2 didnt have a Vector shader....so its CPU was always bootlegged, but it didnt have to use a single shader model. Thats why later PS2 games raped the hardware to its limits....
DC was never really put to its limits(execpt SA2, that game has win graphics)
sega winner, i has a n64 (only to play mario kart), i have a playstation (my favorite in the 90´s) but im sega fan too... i buy the dreamcast and can say that all games that was in the store are the best, nver saw a bad game to the dreamcast catalogue... i play so much.. but my console broke :( . the xbox360 is a marketing console with a short life like the first xbox (nothing comparable to PSX and PS2 and NES and MEGADRIVE).. the xbox360 is near to die,
I HAAVE A DREAMCAST AND REALALY IM SO PROUD FOR HAVE THIS WONDERFULL SYSTEM BECAUSE THE DREAMCAST GIVE ME "FUN" AND IMNOVATIVE GAMES THAT ALL SYSTEM NOW DONT HAVE, NOW ARE ALL GRAPHICS !! OR ONLY CONTROLLERS LIKE WII MOVE AND KINETIC,, BUT DREAMCAST HAVE GAMES SO IMNOVATING , THIS GENERATON IS ONLY SEQUELS , DREAMCAST HAVE GAMES THAT BORN ON DREAMCAST !!! NO ARE FUCKING SEQUELS.... AND ARE IMNOVATING AND FUN IN ALL WAYS !!
DREAMCAST WINS !! AND SPORT GAME IS FROM 1999 Xd!A GAME11 YEARS OLD
(Dreamcast) good times, when the games were really fun. is odd, compare these two video games, so different generations, the dreamcast can be considered the grandfather of the xbox 360.
hey dork, i don't remember insulting you.. keep it civilized.. asserting yourself over people on youtube just shows what a broken down, spineless pussy you are.. so for your own sake, stop it.. ok?
dreamcast failed because it didn't have enough fans.. not because the fans that it had didn't do enough... also, the DC has more fans today than it did back in the day.. they realized its greatness when it was too late.
It would be interesting to see a comparison between some of the titles that are on both systems, such as Rez, Ikaruga, VO:OT, or Trigger Heart Exelica.
very good comparison, the Dreamcast had very advanced graphics for a1998 sistem, from 1998 to 2001it was the most powerfull sistem out there, onlly on 2001 the Xbox and the Gamecube came with better graphics, but not by much, if the Dreamcast had not ended so early it could have evolved even more.
the true power of the Dreamcast is almost capable of the same graphics that the Gamecube and the Xbox can do.
agreed , they just haven't figured the real power of the dreamcast , a good sample is when they were getting a bit of power of it on sonic adventure , that runs 640x480 at 30 fps , and on sonic adventure 2 it has a lot of better graphics and 640x480 60 fps with some kind of anti aliasing , and they didn't have tryied any further than this... ohh there is v-rally 2 that has a fucking high anti aliasing and runs at 60 fps , when 2-4 players mode it got a bit of slow downs on tracks that have trees
The T&L sybsystem was software, so it naturally got optimized with every OS release, of which there were 20 or so. I think the performance can be nearly doubled yet compared to the best of old titles, by arranging the data differently. I don't think i'll get there anytime soon, but i'll sure keep it on my mind and keep trying.
@dinizgames Actually, dreamcast currently has higher graphic capabilities than the original xbox.
around 3,000,000 on-screen polygon capability with currently-360 level rendering speed, and a higher available on-screen sprite count than even our current console, versus around 2,000,000 on-screen polygon capability and lower-than-ps2 sprites/textures... Dreamcast wins.
@dinizgames I thought the Dreamcast still looked better graphically and sound wise too, especially if you had it hooked up to a VGA box which unlocked the Dreamcast's HD resolutions, something the Gamecube and PS2 could never do, the Xbox had good draw distances but the textures looked more washed out and bland to me in comparison to the Dreamcast's colours which looked extremely rich and vibrant looking, it was developed specifically as a Games console with it's own CD medium, maybe that's why.
@dinizgames Thats not true,SSX was a firstgen ps2 game, but still had better snow effects and char models(especially around the joints) than sega extreme sports.Its weird that people still are unable to admit that ps2 had better graphics.Ps2 tops more than 10 million pps, most dc games are lower than 2.I mean I played a lot of dc games(chu chu rocket, space channel, phantasy star online, langrisser) and had never seen anything that look as good as Rachet and Clanck or DevilMayCry :/
@elementalsorcerer113@elementalsorcerer113 On the one hand, PS2 is faster, and in peak should be able to do even higher figures. On the other, 3 Mio vertices per s work easily on Dreamcast with half the CPU and GPU free each, can trivially show you. Yet, on my codebase, some problems would need to be solved to hit 5 Mio vertices per s. Usualy there are twice as many faces as verts, and hardly any PS2 game actually uses more than 3 Mio polys per s.
@elementalsorcerer113 Actually final point, is that Dreamcast is surprisingly up to date for its generation in spite being first, and could survive ports from later systems reduced to 30fps from 60fps original system with better middleware than first gen Kamui, or worse, WinCE. But the death came early, so we hardly have direct comparisons, except perhaps Dead or Alive 2 where DC wins. Silent Hill 4, even with its 20kpoly protagonist, would have been possible on DC too.
Yeah, the 360 had been more successful if the hardware could hold it.
I had bought one from Japan then, beacuase of all the shoot´em-ups that never will find the way to US/EU, but I don´t dare to import it of the risk to get Red light of DOOOOOM.
So, suck it up Microsoft, and come with a console that holds, like the Dreamcast.
if ea weren't dickheads they would've ported ssx to dc
gc3k 5 months ago
Dreamcast has better textures, as always. Eat shit xbox fanboys
BrianlovesAmerica 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow... they look almost the same! Much win FOR dreamcast (i hate my keyboard)
PrrrromotionGiven 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow... they look almost the same! Much win or dreamcast (as usual)
PrrrromotionGiven 5 months ago
wow... they look almost the same! Much win or dreamcast (as usual)
PrrrromotionGiven 5 months ago
This is stupid! the dreamcast was great but come on, the 360 has taken gaming way further than the dreamcast ever could
Gavin66627 7 months ago
I think the Dreamcast game on this case would be more fun because of the speed.
tubumu 8 months ago
When people are talking about graphics, you all do know that the Dreamcast's graphics system is actually 2x more powerful than the PS2. If the DC stayed for even 3 more years, look at how great the games would look!
PIKACHU49386 10 months ago
@PIKACHU49386 True, since the PS2 didnt have a Vector shader....so its CPU was always bootlegged, but it didnt have to use a single shader model. Thats why later PS2 games raped the hardware to its limits....
DC was never really put to its limits(execpt SA2, that game has win graphics)
waddlerobloxxxx 9 months ago
@waddlerobloxxxx The Shenmue games pushed the Dreamcast a lot further than SA2 did, imo.
ScrabbitTheRabbit 3 months ago
sega, very realistic
sesperados 11 months ago
Dreamcast hands down
bryoneill11 1 year ago 2
sega dreamcast wins really xbox 360 and dreamcast looks the same xbox 360 just has better graphics but not by far
UNBOXING1234567890 1 year ago
lol i cant tell that big of dreamcast and xbox 360 looks the same to me sega wins dreamcast ftw
UNBOXING1234567890 1 year ago
sega winner, i has a n64 (only to play mario kart), i have a playstation (my favorite in the 90´s) but im sega fan too... i buy the dreamcast and can say that all games that was in the store are the best, nver saw a bad game to the dreamcast catalogue... i play so much.. but my console broke :( . the xbox360 is a marketing console with a short life like the first xbox (nothing comparable to PSX and PS2 and NES and MEGADRIVE).. the xbox360 is near to die,
frajaos 1 year ago
I HAAVE A DREAMCAST AND REALALY IM SO PROUD FOR HAVE THIS WONDERFULL SYSTEM BECAUSE THE DREAMCAST GIVE ME "FUN" AND IMNOVATIVE GAMES THAT ALL SYSTEM NOW DONT HAVE, NOW ARE ALL GRAPHICS !! OR ONLY CONTROLLERS LIKE WII MOVE AND KINETIC,, BUT DREAMCAST HAVE GAMES SO IMNOVATING , THIS GENERATON IS ONLY SEQUELS , DREAMCAST HAVE GAMES THAT BORN ON DREAMCAST !!! NO ARE FUCKING SEQUELS.... AND ARE IMNOVATING AND FUN IN ALL WAYS !!
DREAMCAST WINS !! AND SPORT GAME IS FROM 1999 Xd!A GAME11 YEARS OLD
sonicromer 1 year ago
(Dreamcast) good times, when the games were really fun. is odd, compare these two video games, so different generations, the dreamcast can be considered the grandfather of the xbox 360.
TheFred128 1 year ago
wtf?!
giosseppexl 1 year ago
WOOWWWW, The Extreme Sports really beat the Ampeed!!
The details, textures, wow, that's why I love sega!!
segadreamer 1 year ago 2
AMPED 3 LOOKS BAD. DREAMCAST WAS WAY AHEAD TIME
whackyronu 1 year ago
you thought about making another video like this would be good
MsTitomix 1 year ago
Dreamcast actually looks better in this one
dale456654 1 year ago
Dreamcast full game
excellent
Dreamcast 2
Dream Never Die
wilder9777 1 year ago
"dreamcast"
1marcos55 1 year ago
dreamcast allways wins!!
ShenmueJKD 2 years ago
everybody says they love dreamcast so why did you all let it fall flat on its face????????????????????????
cdbils001 2 years ago 3
Because you appreciate something more when it's gone...
TheMarkOfTheBeast1 2 years ago
we didn't let it fall on its face... you did.
what were we supposed to do? buy 3 DC consoles each to keep it alive?
adegamisoumounopano 2 years ago 2
@adegamisoumounopano no fool how could something with so many so called fans do so badlt then?????????
cdbils001 2 years ago
hey dork, i don't remember insulting you.. keep it civilized.. asserting yourself over people on youtube just shows what a broken down, spineless pussy you are.. so for your own sake, stop it.. ok?
dreamcast failed because it didn't have enough fans.. not because the fans that it had didn't do enough... also, the DC has more fans today than it did back in the day.. they realized its greatness when it was too late.
adegamisoumounopano 2 years ago
@adegamisoumounopano if you like mate i know what i am talking about i own almost every dreamcast game ever made and fool is hardly offensive is it
cdbils001 2 years ago
if it were 2001 again and i had a choice between ps2 and dreamcast, i would definitely choose the dreamcast.
djmick90 2 years ago
i have my dreamcast and still play it, talk to Sega about that.
santiago262 2 years ago
i still own mine, fucking amazing system, way ahead of its time, i loved it and still do.
gerfall 2 years ago 4
It would be interesting to see a comparison between some of the titles that are on both systems, such as Rez, Ikaruga, VO:OT, or Trigger Heart Exelica.
tehkevxor1983 2 years ago
Kind of - actually, really sad. That the dreamcast wins.
I'm happy though! XD
bkev93 2 years ago 3
SEGA WINNER
wilder9777 2 years ago 19
Sega Dreamcast forever!! We love you Sega Dreamcast
Sonicvaden 2 years ago 3
Again, it's 'Welcome to the World' by Kevin Rudolf
tomleecee 2 years ago
what's the name of this song ?
misugi2 2 years ago
Comment removed
darksonicma 3 years ago
very good comparison, the Dreamcast had very advanced graphics for a1998 sistem, from 1998 to 2001it was the most powerfull sistem out there, onlly on 2001 the Xbox and the Gamecube came with better graphics, but not by much, if the Dreamcast had not ended so early it could have evolved even more.
the true power of the Dreamcast is almost capable of the same graphics that the Gamecube and the Xbox can do.
Great video and 5 stars.
dinizgames 3 years ago 18
agreed , they just haven't figured the real power of the dreamcast , a good sample is when they were getting a bit of power of it on sonic adventure , that runs 640x480 at 30 fps , and on sonic adventure 2 it has a lot of better graphics and 640x480 60 fps with some kind of anti aliasing , and they didn't have tryied any further than this... ohh there is v-rally 2 that has a fucking high anti aliasing and runs at 60 fps , when 2-4 players mode it got a bit of slow downs on tracks that have trees
darksonicma 3 years ago 4
The T&L sybsystem was software, so it naturally got optimized with every OS release, of which there were 20 or so. I think the performance can be nearly doubled yet compared to the best of old titles, by arranging the data differently. I don't think i'll get there anytime soon, but i'll sure keep it on my mind and keep trying.
3yE 2 years ago
@dinizgames no they had same graphics retard
UNBOXING1234567890 1 year ago
@dinizgames Actually, dreamcast currently has higher graphic capabilities than the original xbox.
around 3,000,000 on-screen polygon capability with currently-360 level rendering speed, and a higher available on-screen sprite count than even our current console, versus around 2,000,000 on-screen polygon capability and lower-than-ps2 sprites/textures... Dreamcast wins.
kinkinkijkin 6 months ago
@kinkinkijkin come on man, as much as i love the DC theres not a chance it is more powerful than the xbox
noideac 2 months ago
@dinizgames I thought the Dreamcast still looked better graphically and sound wise too, especially if you had it hooked up to a VGA box which unlocked the Dreamcast's HD resolutions, something the Gamecube and PS2 could never do, the Xbox had good draw distances but the textures looked more washed out and bland to me in comparison to the Dreamcast's colours which looked extremely rich and vibrant looking, it was developed specifically as a Games console with it's own CD medium, maybe that's why.
Calengela 5 months ago
@Calengela To compare the same game with differents signals(vga vs rgb/composite) is unfair, man.
elementalsorcerer113 4 months ago
@dinizgames Thats not true,SSX was a firstgen ps2 game, but still had better snow effects and char models(especially around the joints) than sega extreme sports.Its weird that people still are unable to admit that ps2 had better graphics.Ps2 tops more than 10 million pps, most dc games are lower than 2.I mean I played a lot of dc games(chu chu rocket, space channel, phantasy star online, langrisser) and had never seen anything that look as good as Rachet and Clanck or DevilMayCry :/
elementalsorcerer113 4 months ago
@elementalsorcerer113 @elementalsorcerer113 On the one hand, PS2 is faster, and in peak should be able to do even higher figures. On the other, 3 Mio vertices per s work easily on Dreamcast with half the CPU and GPU free each, can trivially show you. Yet, on my codebase, some problems would need to be solved to hit 5 Mio vertices per s. Usualy there are twice as many faces as verts, and hardly any PS2 game actually uses more than 3 Mio polys per s.
SianaGearz 2 months ago
@elementalsorcerer113 Actually final point, is that Dreamcast is surprisingly up to date for its generation in spite being first, and could survive ports from later systems reduced to 30fps from 60fps original system with better middleware than first gen Kamui, or worse, WinCE. But the death came early, so we hardly have direct comparisons, except perhaps Dead or Alive 2 where DC wins. Silent Hill 4, even with its 20kpoly protagonist, would have been possible on DC too.
SianaGearz 2 months ago
It's 'Welcome to the World' by Kevin Rudolf
tomleecee 3 years ago
awesome! whats the name of the song?
btw, dreamcast and 360 are the 2 most awesome consoles out there!
360 feels like the spiritual successor to dreamcast imo ;)
deesims 3 years ago
Yeah, the 360 had been more successful if the hardware could hold it.
I had bought one from Japan then, beacuase of all the shoot´em-ups that never will find the way to US/EU, but I don´t dare to import it of the risk to get Red light of DOOOOOM.
So, suck it up Microsoft, and come with a console that holds, like the Dreamcast.
Voldo83 3 years ago