Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
@lin2log BTW, I never bashed FCPX and it's sync ability. Merely mentioned that there are some minor issues with it here and there. I love FCPX, because, like with Sony Vegas, I can practically do everything from within one app. I am able to use PE in FCP7 without leaving the application, but FCPX's new code currently doesn't let PE do this in FCPX. If syncing in FCPX works for you or anyone else, they don't need this app. But some still have issues currently in FCPX.
lvproductionsLLC 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lin2log why the anger..
Have ever tried Plural Eyes? It has rave reviews from tons of people using it. Congrats if FCPX's sync feature has worked well for you. FCPX has been a bit more hit or miss for me.
I'm trained in FCPX and it has some known sync issues with more complex edits, say 1-2 audio sources, 3-4+ cameras. Look on Apples own boards.
MultiCam and PE isn't pointless. PE can create a mc clip from the synced audio/video. But, as FCPX doesn't support multi camera editing.
lvproductionsLLC 2 months ago
Comment removed
lvproductionsLLC 2 months ago
Comment removed
lvproductionsLLC 2 months ago
Comment removed
lvproductionsLLC 2 months ago
As of 12/31/11 new update v2.1 it now works perfect for me. Had problems with the first v2 beta.
Thanks and all the best for 2012 with new exciting featured added :-)
GlobeRidersLLC 2 months ago
Thank you! Finally!
dianalundin 2 months ago
why u invest in developt software for FCP X ? nobody use it ...FCP 7 FTW
solo643 2 months ago
@solo643 FYI, some people do use FCPX. I'm a full-time professional video editor (though you can't quite tell from my YouTube page, haven't updated it in a long time, LOL!) and I use FCPX almost exclusively. It's not perfect, but it's got some really nice features. And amazing performance!
davidjtate 2 months ago
@solo643
Because, as your comment illustrates perfectly, only clueless morons haven't made the switch yet.
lin2log 2 months ago
@lin2log it's seems that u don't work in this industry at all.You can't say that FC X it's a professional video editor:)just because Apple say that this is revolutionary:) No wonder they give money back :)
solo643 2 months ago
BTW, love the fact this finally came out. Love Plural Eyes in FCP7 and have been waiting for Plural Eyes for FCPX. Definitely going to give it a try.
lvproductionsLLC 2 months ago
I guarantee that Plural Eyes will give you a more accurate sync than FCPX at this stage.
lvproductionsLLC 2 months ago
@lvproductionsLLC Thanks.
@Bruce Sharpe Any official confirmation?
buildyo 2 months ago
Nice, we are going to take it for a spin
idustrialrevolution 2 months ago
For dual system audio like shown in the first example what is the advantage of using Plural Eyes over the built in audio sync of Final Cut Pro X?
buildyo 2 months ago
@buildyo
None. It's in fact a complete waste of time. Other than for the multi-cam (which is assuming you in fact have idiots as camera-men that are constantly start/stopping the camera like those in the example), I see no reason why one would actually spend money for the exact same functionality you already have *for free*.
lin2log 2 months ago