I'll tell you where Thad Cochran stands. He made "PORKER OF THE MONTH," for April 2010. Don't expect much from this bum. If I have my way, he won't get enough votes to stay in office. I live in Mississippi.
Furthermore, the Franken amendment does NOT dictate contract law. It only stipulates that companies with clauses like this will not receive government contracts. They can still have whatever they want in their contracts, but the government won't hire them. That's reasonable. It also makes Thad Cochran's argument dead in the water.
Aren't ye making a big deal about nothing? Obviously any employment contract is null-and-void that would say you cannot sue in court if you've been raped.
As the SCOTUS has said, "Citizens can not sign away legally-protected rights," and not being raped is such a right.
If I was raped, and my contract said I was bound to arbitration, I'd tell tell the corporation to go frak itself, and FILE CHARGES immediately.
No judge would uphold such a sheitty employment contract.
EXCELLENT VIDEO! Thank you, questioning dude! You kicked that coward's ass! You SHOULD be in Congress!
Thad - No one is saying the Feds are writing the agreement. No one is saying let's violate your Master's sacred hold on their employees' freedom. All we are saying is if a co has such a restrictive policy, forbid them from federal contracts.
GOPubes are so out of touch. No real person reads the fine print or understands it if they do. The Govt can help secure people's safety easily.
Vote this "Pro-Rape", "C-Street" supporter out of office. I know the Republicans are the party of "No" right now, but to vote for big business over the rights of a rape victim? Well, now I have seen it all. This fuck is one of 30 that voted no on the Franken amendment. UNBELIEVABLE! TRULY!
Very good! It is totally amazing to me our religious touting republicans are caught on the fence with business and peoples rights. The US people need to wake up and see where the scum they voted into office really stand when it comes down to beliefs or who is lining their pockets. How can they be so blind?
following the logic of Franken's construction / amendment - we should add requirements that robbery and murder are not to be allowed within the fed contract - or add by name every illegal act
Franken's language was unneeded because rape or slavery or murder or any other criminal act is already subject to OTHER venues of judicial review - that is the point Sen Cochran was making
but I have - I do legislation for a living and I worked in the Senate for 11 years - for members of the leadership of both parties - with all due respect, you don't understand what Thad was saying
With all due respect, I really don't give a fuck about what Cochran said. By voting no on the Franken amendment he is saying to God and everyone that he is more concerned with KBR/Haliburton, then a women being gang raped. A victim of assault should not have to arbitrate with their employers before they can take their case to an article 3 court. As a matter of fact, the employer should only find out about if they are called in to the case in an article 3 court. Cochran is a pro-rape asshole!
well, giving you and your comment all the respect it deserves, and I think you can guess just how much THAT is - there are a myriad of reasons to vote for and against amendments to legislation - Thad gave a cogent and logical reason why he voted no - you are assuming you can read his mind and determine motivations that are not expressed
I imagine your ability to read minds must make you very popular - and quite lucrative as well
smiles - now go away liberal sycophant (lol go look it up...)
That's bullshit. Thad was saying that the government should not be able to dictate contracts, but if he means that, he could also be saying that OSHA is not something he supports. If a contract involves someone surrendering basic human rights, then damned straight the government should be able to legislate it, and include it in labor and contract law. I for one do not think that the Franken amendment goes far enough. It only covers government contracts. I think that's not enough.
The Franken amendment does NOT dictate contract law. It only stipulates that companies with clauses like this will not receive govt contracts. They can still have whatever they want in their contracts, but the government won't hire them. It also makes T.Cochran's argument dead in the water.
De facto, by voting pro rape, the RepuKKKes ARE dictating contract law, de facto they are.
What kind of Senator (he's after all, part of the govt) does NOT wanna give rape victims the best defense?
a criminal act cannot be enforced through a contractual agreement - Sen Cochran was simply stating that the fed govt should not be in the business of adding additional requirements to fed contracts when judicial review is already available to address this issue
posit this: why would Sen Franken or any other Member want to add a a requirement to get a fed contract that states slavery is not part of available options in said fed contract - it's because slavery is already illegal
This man doesn't seem to understand that rape is a criminal act. Why should criminals be able to get away with their crimes and the companies who hire them get away with employing these criminals. THANK GOD FOR AL FRANKEN! I'm sure that Cochran was really pissed that all those keypads on all doors didn't work.
Exactly Frank! It is money over human rights and just decency itself for these people. They could care less about these women-hell, maybe they have stock in the companies, who knows!
This shit head Thad, didn't bank on having someone know what the fuck they were talking about question his "rape victim beware" ass. Fucking corporate cracker. Great video.
This has been flagged as spam show
wazzzzzup? =)
TheRealMichaelBaer 9 months ago
If I'm not mistaken this guy has an IQ of 52?
adantesoup 11 months ago
I'll tell you where Thad Cochran stands. He made "PORKER OF THE MONTH," for April 2010. Don't expect much from this bum. If I have my way, he won't get enough votes to stay in office. I live in Mississippi.
buddybleau 1 year ago
the reporter lets him off the hook:
You had him right there! When you said the that the govt IS NOT writing anything, it's simply not willing to do business with those companies.
When he voted pro-rape, he WAS IN FACT, "De Facto" writing a law that meddled between companies and employees.
Thanks to Al Franken, it's not anymore.
30 RepuKKKe Senators, all MALE, all WHITE. the one Latino voted with the Dems ....
TheSteelGeneral 2 years ago
Furthermore, the Franken amendment does NOT dictate contract law. It only stipulates that companies with clauses like this will not receive government contracts. They can still have whatever they want in their contracts, but the government won't hire them. That's reasonable. It also makes Thad Cochran's argument dead in the water.
Sheilanagig 2 years ago
This guy Cochran is in the Senate? Oh my God!☺
upsilon054 2 years ago
So far I have noticed that most of these senators that voted against the bill are old white men. Hmmmmm
jeangrey65 2 years ago
this fucker is sick!
estylz1967 2 years ago
In a Republicans eyes, a little rape is good for a woman.
I will never understand for the life of me why Republicans hate women so much - their scorn for opposite sex is so visceral.
" Well if she signed the contract, and did not read the fine print that said, she will be gang raped every Tuesday - well too bad for her."
Because we all know whatever a corporation put into a contract's fine print is the law of the land and no court should be able to tamper with it.
Republicans are scum.
gorillabang79 2 years ago
Aren't ye making a big deal about nothing? Obviously any employment contract is null-and-void that would say you cannot sue in court if you've been raped.
As the SCOTUS has said, "Citizens can not sign away legally-protected rights," and not being raped is such a right.
If I was raped, and my contract said I was bound to arbitration, I'd tell tell the corporation to go frak itself, and FILE CHARGES immediately.
No judge would uphold such a sheitty employment contract.
.
harleykman 2 years ago
EXCELLENT VIDEO! Thank you, questioning dude! You kicked that coward's ass! You SHOULD be in Congress!
Thad - No one is saying the Feds are writing the agreement. No one is saying let's violate your Master's sacred hold on their employees' freedom. All we are saying is if a co has such a restrictive policy, forbid them from federal contracts.
GOPubes are so out of touch. No real person reads the fine print or understands it if they do. The Govt can help secure people's safety easily.
NakedWombat666 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Vote this "Pro-Rape", "C-Street" supporter out of office. I know the Republicans are the party of "No" right now, but to vote for big business over the rights of a rape victim? Well, now I have seen it all. This fuck is one of 30 that voted no on the Franken amendment. UNBELIEVABLE! TRULY!
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
Congress should do those things outlined in Article One of the Constitution - writing contracts just isn't there
MModster 2 years ago
The government shouldn't write contracts for companies that contract for the government?
What should the Congress be doing?
Felix1049 2 years ago
Very good! It is totally amazing to me our religious touting republicans are caught on the fence with business and peoples rights. The US people need to wake up and see where the scum they voted into office really stand when it comes down to beliefs or who is lining their pockets. How can they be so blind?
Jamie' dad
tjinmarshall 2 years ago
following the logic of Franken's construction / amendment - we should add requirements that robbery and murder are not to be allowed within the fed contract - or add by name every illegal act
Franken's language was unneeded because rape or slavery or murder or any other criminal act is already subject to OTHER venues of judicial review - that is the point Sen Cochran was making
MModster 2 years ago
You obviously have not read the Franken amendment. You went off on some freaky thing here, this fuck is PRO-RAPE!
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
@phillipmarch22
but I have - I do legislation for a living and I worked in the Senate for 11 years - for members of the leadership of both parties - with all due respect, you don't understand what Thad was saying
MModster 2 years ago
With all due respect, I really don't give a fuck about what Cochran said. By voting no on the Franken amendment he is saying to God and everyone that he is more concerned with KBR/Haliburton, then a women being gang raped. A victim of assault should not have to arbitrate with their employers before they can take their case to an article 3 court. As a matter of fact, the employer should only find out about if they are called in to the case in an article 3 court. Cochran is a pro-rape asshole!
phillipmarch22 2 years ago
well, giving you and your comment all the respect it deserves, and I think you can guess just how much THAT is - there are a myriad of reasons to vote for and against amendments to legislation - Thad gave a cogent and logical reason why he voted no - you are assuming you can read his mind and determine motivations that are not expressed
I imagine your ability to read minds must make you very popular - and quite lucrative as well
smiles - now go away liberal sycophant (lol go look it up...)
MModster 2 years ago
I would add that harleyman makes my point from another angle
you cannot enforce a contract that signs away your rights
MModster 2 years ago
That's bullshit. Thad was saying that the government should not be able to dictate contracts, but if he means that, he could also be saying that OSHA is not something he supports. If a contract involves someone surrendering basic human rights, then damned straight the government should be able to legislate it, and include it in labor and contract law. I for one do not think that the Franken amendment goes far enough. It only covers government contracts. I think that's not enough.
Sheilanagig 2 years ago
The Franken amendment does NOT dictate contract law. It only stipulates that companies with clauses like this will not receive govt contracts. They can still have whatever they want in their contracts, but the government won't hire them. It also makes T.Cochran's argument dead in the water.
De facto, by voting pro rape, the RepuKKKes ARE dictating contract law, de facto they are.
What kind of Senator (he's after all, part of the govt) does NOT wanna give rape victims the best defense?
TheSteelGeneral 2 years ago
a criminal act cannot be enforced through a contractual agreement - Sen Cochran was simply stating that the fed govt should not be in the business of adding additional requirements to fed contracts when judicial review is already available to address this issue
posit this: why would Sen Franken or any other Member want to add a a requirement to get a fed contract that states slavery is not part of available options in said fed contract - it's because slavery is already illegal
MModster 2 years ago
I hope Cochran's constituents have the sense to vote him out of office.
Thynbelle 2 years ago
WOW, just WOW.
not a legal issue and should be taken up with the company that employees the men who did this. is this what his reasoning for his vote is. WOW.
did a political comedian just get 30 members of the senate removed in 2010. WOW,
i know that franken is a comedian and its by reflex to bounce anything he says but this really should have been a "slam dunk" (quoted)
also gotta love watching the senator try to escape thru locked doors
bsdoblivion 2 years ago
This man is a sick bastard, how can anyone be a republican after this?
anirband 2 years ago
This man doesn't seem to understand that rape is a criminal act. Why should criminals be able to get away with their crimes and the companies who hire them get away with employing these criminals. THANK GOD FOR AL FRANKEN! I'm sure that Cochran was really pissed that all those keypads on all doors didn't work.
mmm413 2 years ago
Exactly Frank! It is money over human rights and just decency itself for these people. They could care less about these women-hell, maybe they have stock in the companies, who knows!
icitnow 2 years ago
This shit head Thad, didn't bank on having someone know what the fuck they were talking about question his "rape victim beware" ass. Fucking corporate cracker. Great video.
TheFrankFactor 2 years ago 2