Book TV: After Words: Frederick Hitz, "Why Spy?" interviewed by Peter Earnest

[MacBubbles]

The fact that you think anyone who is paranoid of the government is automatically a genius and automatically correct isn't evidence of anything. Check out the links, and tell me what's factually incorrect about them. They debunk Loose Change point by point, and reveal obvious flaws in Loose Change's arguments. The links shows that whether you like the government or not doesn't even matter because either way Loose Change isn't based upon fact. Otherwise, enjoy your world of paranoia.

[mercuryrazvedka]

@MacBubbles If you want to believe the government conspiracey theory fill you naive boots, but the body of evidence points else-where. You are a true believer and the government banks on your unthinking support.

Denial is an acceptable coping mechanism for sheeple. If you want to remain in denial about the world outside your front door don't question anything your government says or does.

[MacBubbles]

The two links below clearly show that people like you are the conspiracy theorists. The two links I post clearly shows how Loose Change distorts the truth. There are plenty of people who are dissatisfied with our government who don't resort to these off the wall government conspiracy theories (e.g., Noam Chomsky). Noam Chomsky has been a vocal government critic for decades, and he has enough common sense to see through the BS in Loose Change.

tinyurl(dot)com/37vtrvm

tinyurl(dot)com/2uc6ty6

[mercuryrazvedka]

@MacBubbles Yes the the Government Commission is a conspiracy THEORY! If you want to believe the govt posn you must see UFO's and Santa as real. The overwhelming body of EVIDENCE points elsewhere. Noam has not watched LC nor examined the forensic evidence blowing through NY. Noam is brilliant on linguistics but no engineer.

[mercuryrazvedka]

Watch 'Loose Change', these old cold war hacks are sooo out of touch with America's strategic intrests in Eurasia and USE of Al Qaeda.

Obviously not in on the 9/11 joke.

[MacBubbles]

@mercuryrazvedka

Loose Change seemed pretty persuasive to me when I first watched it. But, I hate to burst your bubble. It has been shown fairly easily that Loose Change is so full of errors that it's scary that people even believe in it. It's entertaining though, LOL.

[mercuryrazvedka]

@MacBubbles Like to take you seriously 'body wave man'.

List the errors.......

[MacBubbles]

@mercuryrazvedka

It would take me days to list the errors myself. Just google 911 debunked. Cheers!

[mercuryrazvedka]

@MacBubbles 9/11 debunked has itself been debunked by over 1000 engineers and architects for 9/11 truth. I would match one trained engineer agaist a government flunky anyday.

[MacBubbles]

These are not government flunkies I'm talking about. Sure, the government has proven itself incompetent time after time. But, it seems like ordinary people have found obvious flaws/distortions in Loose Change that convince me that the people who put Loose Change together are far more incompetent than the government. Watch/read for yourself...

tinyurl(dot)com/37vtrvm

tinyurl(dot)com/2uc6ty6

But, hey, believe whatever you want; I don't care what you chose to believe.

[mercuryrazvedka]

@MacBubbles If you don't care don't reply miss bubbles, but the natural reation to information that shakes ones trust in government is DENIAL, then SHOCK, SADDNESS< then ANGER. You are still working through the denial phase.

[MacBubbles]

Do you check your closet for the bugey-man, too? As the two links below show, Loose Change doesn't have to be debunked by the government, by experts, or by any kind of ideology. All it takes is an open mind and a little bit of common sense to see Loose Change for what it really is. As bad as the government may be, the links show how the people who made Loose Change are far more incompetent. Questioning your government is one thing; trapping yourself in a world of a paranoia is another.