Glo0balization is killing inginuity and invention by creating monopoly's that can steal inventions and inovations and scrap them so that no one can have them and the global elite can continue degrading and genocidally socially engineering society... That is why Russia is more like the USA used to be and the USA and west is more like the east was 20 years ago.
I think manned space flight has simmered down mostly because we now have robots to do that job without the risk of losing astronauts. A noble cause none the less, space exploration is of the highest importance!
I agree that it's innovative individuals who bring about the future, but if this generation of profit seekers lead the way the common man won't be able to afford it anyways.
People always focus on the technical benefit of NASA, ignoring its drain on industry. Now that NASA is gone, we are finally seeing companies like Virgin Galactic come into existence. Without NASA, however, these companies would have been on the scene sooner
@DeoVindice00 I'm confused too. Maybe the Bush administration's specific space policies could have been better, but Bush was way more pro-private-sector than just about anybody else.
I would sweep floors, take out the trash, clean the bathrooms, cut the grass, get everyone coffee, clean the offices....whatever it would take just to get my foot in the door at RAF/Scaled Composites and work my way up to test Pilot!!!! Could you imagine being under the wing of his brother Dick Rutan? Would be AWESOME!
I am absolutely convinced that Burt Rutan in the top 5 most important aerospace personalities in all of history. The only people who I can think hold a higher position are Wilbur and Orville Wright, Werner Von Braun, and Kelly Johnson.
@oisiaa ummm what about Sergei Korolev? (the man who put the first satellite and man in orbit). Konstantin Tsiolkovsky? (the father of astronautics), Robert Goddard? (the man who pioneered the liquid fuel rocket).
I do admire Burt Rutan but he doesn't even come close to any of the legendary giants of flight or spaceflight history. He pioneered some airframe designs but that's about it.
Energy issues are part of the problem. Sending someone to space if still 100 percent efficient is expensive. We basically needs alot of fusion reactors to built. But the tech for that is super underfunded. No proof it will work. THe hippies are against nuclear, big business don't care because it won't become viable for atleat 30 plus years.
wow.....30,000 views in almost 3 years huh?...little weird. This sounds like a fun idea but we all know why there has been no innovation in this topic. And if any of u don't see the suppressed information we have not been given...well then u just have no hope.This all could have happened a long time ago if i t wasn't for our so called leaders. People can be so naive...it's sad.......
Burt Rutan understands the very simple concept that we cannot keep all our eggs in one basket. Humanity needs to be viably established off-planet before some earthbound psychopaths destroy life on Earth.
May he live long and prosper and retire on the Moon.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Outer space and flying is cool and all, but we have more pressing issues on which to spend our time and resources on planet earth. Sorry man, your passion must wait (at least if we are a rational and a reasonable species).
I think manned space flight has simmered down mostly because we now have robots to do that job without the risk of losing astronauts. A noble cause none the less, space exploration is of the highest importance!
Inspiring kids begins with inspiring imitation. Building a flying model is the first step. Joining the EAA Young Eagles program is a terrific second step. This type of motivation is not coming from our schools. It requires personal mentoring at a very early age. Today's a good day to start.
elvis is right. i think we'll witness a lot of progress in space travel the next years. just as we did with computers in the nineties. it has yet begun.
beautiful thought... I am 23 and I am thinking now how to invest in the future of space flight. Investing time with children to do this kind of thing is a good way to go I think. If we can do this I can see really good things coming out of those children's minds.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i absolutely admire burt rutan and i respect and love what he is trying to do for man. but in America right now, we have Bigger problems than having the average man get to the moon. and the conflict with NASA isnt helping.
Burt Rutan is despised by the media for the exact same reasons that Ron Paul is. Burt Rutan has made NASA look like a bunch of idiots when it comes to reentry. He also refused to help Lockheed Martin build bombs and instead chose to help the public get into space. The media such as NBC is owned by defense contractors. I'm sick and tired of explaining to people who Burt Rutan is but it is because of the media that I have to.
With Burt Rutan announcing that his goal is to send the average person to the Moon, if the media was unbiased, Burt Rutan would get non-stop coverage for weeks or even months.
I partially agree with you're saying, but frankly the original idea for feathered re-entry came from an NACA (now NASA) employee. And secondly, as Burt Rutan has said himself that it won't work on a return from orbit. And since NASA doesn't do any sub-orbital human spaceflight, they can't utilize feathered re-entry.
That's now what I heard, Burt Rutan was playing badminton and that is where the idea came from. If NACA did come up with the idea, they would have used it.
The NACA guy was a bit vague, but it was essentially the same idea. Either way, Burt Rutan actually did it and proved it was possible, which is a huge achievement.
The X-15 contracts were awarded in 1955 and 56, to North American and Reactions Motors for the airframe and engines, respectively. The NACA idea didn't come about until 1958, and the X-15 made its test flight the following year.
@dude58677 He makes NASA look like a bunch of idiots? While this man's feathering design may have helped reentry, NASA has delved deeper into the cosmos than any other agency or person ever has. NASA has peered 13 billion years into the past, when the universe was in its infancy. Show some respect for the organization that has gotten us where we are today, dude.
@Goldiney After the US vs USSR space race that Mr. Rutan so eloquently described ended, NASA has done nothing for us. What benefit does sending a space probe past Neptune have for our society? The private sector innovates and succeeds because it must to survive, while the public sector does nothing because it's insulated from reality.
I agree with boldstandard at the same time power is made by power being taken. The other thing is in most economies if not all it is very hard to tell the rich what to do with their money. By the way my parents never had a computer in the 70's and they recently purchased their first true computer in 2002.
5 stars. If we really cared about security and innovation, we would trade, and explore space rather than invade for the limited resources on this rock.
Nice Videos! Come and visit the International Space Agency (ISA) youtube site. Just click on this user to go to the ISA youtube site! Ad-Astra! To The Stars! In Peace For All Mankind!
He almost said it. I thought he would. The stagnation of NASA since the mid 70's was the result of Werner von Braun's team retiring. The Soviet space program was entirely developed by enslaved German Scientists. They all died off in the 80's as the Soviet space program slowed as well. The great space race of the late 40's through 70's was the result of a surge of captured German technologies and people.
That's where things start. The rich people pay very high prices for an early product with a lot of bugs, and the money they pay funds further research to bring the costs down and quality up. The plane was invented in the very early 1900's, but it took more than fifty years for airflight to be a reasonable means of travel for the masses. It just takes time.
Burt himself admits they're making a hell of a lot of profit on sub-orbital spaceflight. If his dream - and that of Richard Branson - was to get the average person into space, they'd chase that dream and would sacrifice money for it.
Well, rich billionaires have a lot of spare money. So they don't need a large amount of profit from an extra business. FWIW, I admire Burt Rutan hugely, and yes, I was a bit harsh in the comments, but it is a lot of comments and I think it can be done cheaper. Nonetheless, he's an incredible innovative aerospace engineer - most probably the best aerospace engineer alive today - he's not greedy, and he's very enthusiastic. My comments probably misrepresented my opinion of him; he's a pioneer.
Seriously, I look up to him. I was wrong. That's a full blown apology; sorry. Who knows when space tourism would have started had it not been for SpaceShipOne/Tier 1.
true, all conflicting each other, i think the things that must do that earth unite, all smart people (left brainer) and designer (rightbrainer) combine in one org (ike un but seriously) and think bout the earth and then can foward space. we get slow because now to much independent, private sector and all, and we loose the main focus, humanity and beyond
Burt Rutan is the greatest engineer of our time. 100 years from now we will truly understand this. Burt Rutan is my biggest hero....the guy is a giant and not recognized. -Me, Engineer
The answer to this is stop spending endless billions of dollars by going to war every gosh darn few years with some newly perceived enemy and start putting our money on the next explorable frontier, space.
This man is in the top ten of all my heroes. Whatever anyone thinks of the man, you can't deny he's done some great things. I hope he inspires many more 'do-ers' in the near future.
While I admire and greatly respect Mr. Rutan, I wonder if he gives enough credit to the progress by public (i.e. government) enterprise in base science that enable later commercial development. I am somewhat dismayed that he does not examine the dynamic of public funding applied to avenues of interest that, at the outset, have no apparent commercial purpose.
It is the dynamic of private funding applied to avenues of interest that have no apparent (to most people) commercial purpose that has always moved things forward. It has almost always been the case that projects which were being privately funded in the beginning were hijacked by the government once they started to prove themselves, and then once they became successful (less than they probably would have if they'd remained private), the government took the credit.
think of it another way. USA spends 160billion dollars yearly for a war, and just 20 billion dolar in 10 YEARS for international space station. Imagine what you can do with 160 billion dollars per year
Glo0balization is killing inginuity and invention by creating monopoly's that can steal inventions and inovations and scrap them so that no one can have them and the global elite can continue degrading and genocidally socially engineering society... That is why Russia is more like the USA used to be and the USA and west is more like the east was 20 years ago.
Rossome4040 3 weeks ago
cool
TheTrieye 3 weeks ago
Burt Rutan is awesome. I am inspired to pursue a career in aerospace!
iugey 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think manned space flight has simmered down mostly because we now have robots to do that job without the risk of losing astronauts. A noble cause none the less, space exploration is of the highest importance!
MrPEDOCTOR 2 months ago
I agree that it's innovative individuals who bring about the future, but if this generation of profit seekers lead the way the common man won't be able to afford it anyways.
Sentios 2 months ago
People always focus on the technical benefit of NASA, ignoring its drain on industry. Now that NASA is gone, we are finally seeing companies like Virgin Galactic come into existence. Without NASA, however, these companies would have been on the scene sooner
cooljool1 2 months ago
Thats my uncles dad :D thats awsome right
Jcthor96 3 months ago
@DeoVindice00 I'm confused too. Maybe the Bush administration's specific space policies could have been better, but Bush was way more pro-private-sector than just about anybody else.
98rallets 5 months ago
I would sweep floors, take out the trash, clean the bathrooms, cut the grass, get everyone coffee, clean the offices....whatever it would take just to get my foot in the door at RAF/Scaled Composites and work my way up to test Pilot!!!! Could you imagine being under the wing of his brother Dick Rutan? Would be AWESOME!
Tio2Man1969 7 months ago
fascinating man.
hhead44 10 months ago
America needs Burt Rutan to run NASA.
katzkitson 1 year ago
Wish I could have seen this without the obvious edits.
eimb1999 1 year ago
I am absolutely convinced that Burt Rutan in the top 5 most important aerospace personalities in all of history. The only people who I can think hold a higher position are Wilbur and Orville Wright, Werner Von Braun, and Kelly Johnson.
oisiaa 1 year ago 2
@oisiaa you forgot a huge one: HOWARD HUGHES
jagonation 1 year ago
@oisiaa ummm what about Sergei Korolev? (the man who put the first satellite and man in orbit). Konstantin Tsiolkovsky? (the father of astronautics), Robert Goddard? (the man who pioneered the liquid fuel rocket).
I do admire Burt Rutan but he doesn't even come close to any of the legendary giants of flight or spaceflight history. He pioneered some airframe designs but that's about it.
UrDaShInGPriNcE 1 year ago
Energy issues are part of the problem. Sending someone to space if still 100 percent efficient is expensive. We basically needs alot of fusion reactors to built. But the tech for that is super underfunded. No proof it will work. THe hippies are against nuclear, big business don't care because it won't become viable for atleat 30 plus years.
MikDonsen 1 year ago
nice sideburns
slamuraiify 1 year ago
@slamuraiify those are mutan chops, not side burns.
ermarauder 1 year ago
AMAZING GUY!! they should air this or something
veknashs 2 years ago 4
@veknashs go to ted.com and watch it in entirety
ermarauder 1 year ago
@ermarauder I've seen it :) thanks!!
veknashs 1 year ago
It's Rainmaking Time!
How do I get in touch with Burt?
Kim Greenhouse
ItsRainmakingTime 2 years ago
wow.....30,000 views in almost 3 years huh?...little weird. This sounds like a fun idea but we all know why there has been no innovation in this topic. And if any of u don't see the suppressed information we have not been given...well then u just have no hope.This all could have happened a long time ago if i t wasn't for our so called leaders. People can be so naive...it's sad.......
13twistedevil13 2 years ago
It's probably had many, many, many more views on it's TED page.
BearsysRevenge 2 years ago
I originally watched this on the TED website.
AERO1779 1 year ago
Burt is a fucking legend. He's putting space back in the public eye again. About fucking time, too.
youvebeenthunderstru 2 years ago 3
what can i say about burt rutan..........
he is aviation legend....
he is a peace of history
next to wright brothers, lindberg
we need new ideas
and we need people like burt rutan................
SXAJT 2 years ago 4
Burt Rutan understands the very simple concept that we cannot keep all our eggs in one basket. Humanity needs to be viably established off-planet before some earthbound psychopaths destroy life on Earth.
May he live long and prosper and retire on the Moon.
manganl 2 years ago 12
Haha! Like that. "may he retire on the moon".
youvebeenthunderstru 1 year ago
Ok, I'll say it... Jimmy Stewart with side burns lol :P
onethatcansee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Outer space and flying is cool and all, but we have more pressing issues on which to spend our time and resources on planet earth. Sorry man, your passion must wait (at least if we are a rational and a reasonable species).
ninanotturna 2 years ago
Rutan is just an amazing guy... I hope his vision of the future of space travel comes true someday. I hope people make it true.
NikoKun 2 years ago 2
love the side burns
rockystefano 2 years ago 2
Really good
sansanbel 2 years ago
I think manned space flight has simmered down mostly because we now have robots to do that job without the risk of losing astronauts. A noble cause none the less, space exploration is of the highest importance!
RyanInSD 2 years ago
Well said.
redstone1963 2 years ago
Impressive , I am very impressed of his presentation , the content, at least he caught me..
oci62 2 years ago
Burt would do well with Ron Paul... Get the government out of flight development, and leave it to the private enterprise.
oryxx 3 years ago 6
Inspiring kids begins with inspiring imitation. Building a flying model is the first step. Joining the EAA Young Eagles program is a terrific second step. This type of motivation is not coming from our schools. It requires personal mentoring at a very early age. Today's a good day to start.
AmericanFlagsExpress 3 years ago
I will make my money soon and get my ticket! In fact when I do make my money then I will build my own spaceship to go sub-orbital! I cant wait!
BlandyDoes 3 years ago 2
AMEN! This guy speaks the truth!
polyrhythmic1 3 years ago 4
probably heard this before but Apollo 13 didn't say "houtson we have a problem" they said "houston we've HAD a problem" just a small difference
calapanpo 3 years ago
my dear mate,
if u listen to it again, astroz said that twice,
Houston We have a probelm here;
13, say again please,
Houston we've had a problem!!!!!!!!
GO RUTAN,
GO CALPOLY
gulloogtg 2 years ago
my dear mate,
if u listen to it again, astroz said that twice,
Houston We have a probelm here;
13, say again please,
Houston we've had a problem!!!!!!!!
GO RUTAN,
GO CALPOLY
gulloogtg 2 years ago
He says that in real life, Apollo 13 the movie was where they said "Houston, we have a problem"
calapanpo 2 years ago
ya i thought i was quick witted with sarcasm, but he almost got even me with the plant life jab lol
Berdwerd 3 years ago 3
elvis is right. i think we'll witness a lot of progress in space travel the next years. just as we did with computers in the nineties. it has yet begun.
1schwererziehbar1 3 years ago 2
My son is 4 now, when he turns 6 I'll show him this video, along with other similar ones. I hope it will inspire him to try and reach the stars.
purger37 3 years ago
beautiful thought... I am 23 and I am thinking now how to invest in the future of space flight. Investing time with children to do this kind of thing is a good way to go I think. If we can do this I can see really good things coming out of those children's minds.
BlandyDoes 3 years ago
well he is right about giving kids/adults more creativity and ispiration ,instead of garbage food and stupid tv programs.
DMCpro6944 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cmon Rutan, plant life on Mars?
johnsmdm 3 years ago
um, sarcasm.
clannon 3 years ago 2
burt rutan is such a legend i look up to him
brianlo777 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i absolutely admire burt rutan and i respect and love what he is trying to do for man. but in America right now, we have Bigger problems than having the average man get to the moon. and the conflict with NASA isnt helping.
myrightballitches69 3 years ago
I wont to go to mars !!!
orclv 4 years ago
Burt Rutan is despised by the media for the exact same reasons that Ron Paul is. Burt Rutan has made NASA look like a bunch of idiots when it comes to reentry. He also refused to help Lockheed Martin build bombs and instead chose to help the public get into space. The media such as NBC is owned by defense contractors. I'm sick and tired of explaining to people who Burt Rutan is but it is because of the media that I have to.
dude58677 4 years ago 30
That is so true. Gotta love the "independent" media :(
molnes 3 years ago 4
With Burt Rutan announcing that his goal is to send the average person to the Moon, if the media was unbiased, Burt Rutan would get non-stop coverage for weeks or even months.
dude58677 3 years ago 4
"...at $200,000, when you can operate it successfully for about 10% of that" That's 90% profit.
joshatkins94 3 years ago
"...at $200,000, when you can operate it successfully for about 10% of that" That's 90% profit.
joshatkins94 3 years ago
I partially agree with you're saying, but frankly the original idea for feathered re-entry came from an NACA (now NASA) employee. And secondly, as Burt Rutan has said himself that it won't work on a return from orbit. And since NASA doesn't do any sub-orbital human spaceflight, they can't utilize feathered re-entry.
joshatkins94 3 years ago
The X-15 used heated reentry.
dude58677 3 years ago
Still, NACA did come up with the initial idea.
joshatkins94 3 years ago
That's now what I heard, Burt Rutan was playing badminton and that is where the idea came from. If NACA did come up with the idea, they would have used it.
dude58677 3 years ago
Here's a Wikipedia link: tinyurl[.]com[/]6x2699.
The NACA guy was a bit vague, but it was essentially the same idea. Either way, Burt Rutan actually did it and proved it was possible, which is a huge achievement.
The X-15 contracts were awarded in 1955 and 56, to North American and Reactions Motors for the airframe and engines, respectively. The NACA idea didn't come about until 1958, and the X-15 made its test flight the following year.
joshatkins94 3 years ago
@dude58677 He makes NASA look like a bunch of idiots? While this man's feathering design may have helped reentry, NASA has delved deeper into the cosmos than any other agency or person ever has. NASA has peered 13 billion years into the past, when the universe was in its infancy. Show some respect for the organization that has gotten us where we are today, dude.
Goldiney 8 months ago
@Goldiney
There is very little respect for Burt Rutan and he is trying to get YOU into space.
dude58677 8 months ago 2
@Goldiney After the US vs USSR space race that Mr. Rutan so eloquently described ended, NASA has done nothing for us. What benefit does sending a space probe past Neptune have for our society? The private sector innovates and succeeds because it must to survive, while the public sector does nothing because it's insulated from reality.
98rallets 5 months ago
I agree with boldstandard at the same time power is made by power being taken. The other thing is in most economies if not all it is very hard to tell the rich what to do with their money. By the way my parents never had a computer in the 70's and they recently purchased their first true computer in 2002.
vroyen 4 years ago
5 stars. If we really cared about security and innovation, we would trade, and explore space rather than invade for the limited resources on this rock.
pootron 4 years ago 2
Burt Rutan is one of the greatest minds of our time. I believe that he will go down in history as such, but probably not in his lifetime.
eazyrider17 4 years ago 2
Nice Videos! Come and visit the International Space Agency (ISA) youtube site. Just click on this user to go to the ISA youtube site! Ad-Astra! To The Stars! In Peace For All Mankind!
isadashhqdotcom 4 years ago
He almost said it. I thought he would. The stagnation of NASA since the mid 70's was the result of Werner von Braun's team retiring. The Soviet space program was entirely developed by enslaved German Scientists. They all died off in the 80's as the Soviet space program slowed as well. The great space race of the late 40's through 70's was the result of a surge of captured German technologies and people.
api9mm 4 years ago 3
true, they got the ufo tech
thisisapreviewvideo 4 years ago
He is a genius, just like Edison, but I hate the fact that this is just for the fun of the rich and bored.
kedvenceim 4 years ago
That's where things start. The rich people pay very high prices for an early product with a lot of bugs, and the money they pay funds further research to bring the costs down and quality up. The plane was invented in the very early 1900's, but it took more than fifty years for airflight to be a reasonable means of travel for the masses. It just takes time.
nine9s 4 years ago 5
Burt himself admits they're making a hell of a lot of profit on sub-orbital spaceflight. If his dream - and that of Richard Branson - was to get the average person into space, they'd chase that dream and would sacrifice money for it.
joshatkins94 3 years ago
lols, r u retarded thats not the dream the dream is to further the progress of spaceflight by using money from rich billionaires
brianlo777 3 years ago
Well, rich billionaires have a lot of spare money. So they don't need a large amount of profit from an extra business. FWIW, I admire Burt Rutan hugely, and yes, I was a bit harsh in the comments, but it is a lot of comments and I think it can be done cheaper. Nonetheless, he's an incredible innovative aerospace engineer - most probably the best aerospace engineer alive today - he's not greedy, and he's very enthusiastic. My comments probably misrepresented my opinion of him; he's a pioneer.
joshatkins94 3 years ago
Seriously, I look up to him. I was wrong. That's a full blown apology; sorry. Who knows when space tourism would have started had it not been for SpaceShipOne/Tier 1.
Typo: a lot of comments -> a lot of profit
joshatkins94 3 years ago
not for long. Just the next 20years. ;)
DrRandale 4 years ago
a lot of these ted talks have conflicting goals...greens versus capitalist polluters, etc.
kronikthai 4 years ago
true, all conflicting each other, i think the things that must do that earth unite, all smart people (left brainer) and designer (rightbrainer) combine in one org (ike un but seriously) and think bout the earth and then can foward space. we get slow because now to much independent, private sector and all, and we loose the main focus, humanity and beyond
thisisapreviewvideo 4 years ago
Eventualy an asteroid will hit us,they do all the time its just when? Yes we should get all our eggs out of the one earth basket, And fast!
delapeyre 4 years ago
Burt Rutan is the greatest engineer of our time. 100 years from now we will truly understand this. Burt Rutan is my biggest hero....the guy is a giant and not recognized. -Me, Engineer
Spacedgurl 4 years ago 3
The epitome of youtube comments.
darmago 4 years ago
The answer to this is stop spending endless billions of dollars by going to war every gosh darn few years with some newly perceived enemy and start putting our money on the next explorable frontier, space.
viper8red 4 years ago 2
This man is in the top ten of all my heroes. Whatever anyone thinks of the man, you can't deny he's done some great things. I hope he inspires many more 'do-ers' in the near future.
Deadman3913 4 years ago 4
While I admire and greatly respect Mr. Rutan, I wonder if he gives enough credit to the progress by public (i.e. government) enterprise in base science that enable later commercial development. I am somewhat dismayed that he does not examine the dynamic of public funding applied to avenues of interest that, at the outset, have no apparent commercial purpose.
kwixson 4 years ago
It is the dynamic of private funding applied to avenues of interest that have no apparent (to most people) commercial purpose that has always moved things forward. It has almost always been the case that projects which were being privately funded in the beginning were hijacked by the government once they started to prove themselves, and then once they became successful (less than they probably would have if they'd remained private), the government took the credit.
boldstandard 4 years ago
"It will allow us to colonize and keep us going extinct"
I wonder if he believes an asteroid is going to kill life on earth someday.
swivelingchairguy 4 years ago
think of it another way. USA spends 160billion dollars yearly for a war, and just 20 billion dolar in 10 YEARS for international space station. Imagine what you can do with 160 billion dollars per year
sylfamas 4 years ago 5