"Firstly, why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of species being, as we see them, well defined?" -- From Charles Darwin's: "On the Origin of Species"
Adolf Hitler's regime killed individuals, as did Stalin's regime, as did Harry Truman's regime. The religion of a murdered person is immaterial. You are a self-sovereign entity born with inalienable rights. You are not a worker-bee serving the queen. A murder victim suffers a personal trauma, not a collective one. Religion is a means of coping with the metaphysical world. "Atheists" have the reputation of being filthy for good reason.
Miller is a fool and pretty stupid as well. His whole presentation is nothing more that guessing and conjecture; Basically nonsense and sideways logic. It is sad to see someone without the ability to see how ridiculous their statements are. He is simply a believer in a popular religion based on conjecture. He doesn't think beyond his nose, and he actually believes he is intelligent.
I have watched all of his presentations, and it is easy to see where he comes from. It is from a decision somewhere to believe and then to reinforce that belief, because there really is no evidence for the main and final premises of evolution.
theres a strong ID movement in GB??:/ i live in GB and ive never seen an ID movement, they will never get in in 1 million years, britian has a long history of science, and we arnt going to let stupid ideas in our classroom
The real argument is not ID vs Evolution, but evolution has no evidence at all pointing to any real science. It is a belief system. When you put any belief system under correct analysis it falls apart. All beliefs are bad for intelligence. Evolution is just another HEMG belief. Click on my videos I have a great response and very logic to this guy Ken. Ken may be cool but he is really stupid.
It is a long list of beliefs based on no real evidence, and tons of conjecture from "expert" (believers). The belief comes first then the conclusion. The evidence is looked upon with "belief glasses" so the conclusion is always "evolution" on any premise. They would see a turd on the ground and say "it prooves evolution".
'The evidence is looked upon with "belief glasses" '
thats creationist Ken Ham with his 'biblicsl glasses' i think you will find. IT not our fault that reality confirms evolutions predictions of what we should find.
Religion is religion; whether it comes from a
bearded Darwin or a bearded Jesus. Free
yourself. Step into the light.
procommenter 2 years ago
Well, you mean if you want science and rationality look to evolutionary theory which was kicked off, but not limited to, Darwin's ideas.
If you want religion, go to church.
Looking4Coffee 2 years ago
p. 171 Ch. VI. Difficulties on Theory.
"Firstly, why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion instead of species being, as we see them, well defined?" -- From Charles Darwin's: "On the Origin of Species"
procommenter 2 years ago
Adolf Hitler's regime killed individuals, as did Stalin's regime, as did Harry Truman's regime. The religion of a murdered person is immaterial. You are a self-sovereign entity born with inalienable rights. You are not a worker-bee serving the queen. A murder victim suffers a personal trauma, not a collective one. Religion is a means of coping with the metaphysical world. "Atheists" have the reputation of being filthy for good reason.
procommenter 2 years ago
"You and me, and maybe even Bill O'Reilly" ... Lol. Mr Miller's cool.
WidarsHall 3 years ago
Miller is a fool and pretty stupid as well. His whole presentation is nothing more that guessing and conjecture; Basically nonsense and sideways logic. It is sad to see someone without the ability to see how ridiculous their statements are. He is simply a believer in a popular religion based on conjecture. He doesn't think beyond his nose, and he actually believes he is intelligent.
GoodScienceForYou 3 years ago
He's still funny.
WidarsHall 3 years ago
I have watched all of his presentations, and it is easy to see where he comes from. It is from a decision somewhere to believe and then to reinforce that belief, because there really is no evidence for the main and final premises of evolution.
GoodScienceForYou 3 years ago
Why not realize that your "god" is just an illusion and that evolution is forced forwards by crude forces, not by supernatural ones.
saken 3 years ago
theres a strong ID movement in GB??:/ i live in GB and ive never seen an ID movement, they will never get in in 1 million years, britian has a long history of science, and we arnt going to let stupid ideas in our classroom
Erech01 3 years ago 7
Yup, I live in Northern Ireland and our teachers laugh at the American ID-based 'science' curriculum.
Capulator8 3 years ago 5
im glad you replied to me:D ive been looking for these videos againxD
Erech01 3 years ago
Glad to be of help ^^
Capulator8 3 years ago
The real argument is not ID vs Evolution, but evolution has no evidence at all pointing to any real science. It is a belief system. When you put any belief system under correct analysis it falls apart. All beliefs are bad for intelligence. Evolution is just another HEMG belief. Click on my videos I have a great response and very logic to this guy Ken. Ken may be cool but he is really stupid.
GoodScienceForYou 3 years ago
'The real argument is not ID vs Evolution'
no, there is no arguement
'evolution has no evidence at all '
ERV's, genome comparison, human chromosome two, taxonomy, zoology, ect ect ect
'It is a belief system'
and what does it believe?? there is asmuch i beliee about evoluton as i do from gravity, cell theory ect.
Erech01 3 years ago
It is a long list of beliefs based on no real evidence, and tons of conjecture from "expert" (believers). The belief comes first then the conclusion. The evidence is looked upon with "belief glasses" so the conclusion is always "evolution" on any premise. They would see a turd on the ground and say "it prooves evolution".
GoodScienceForYou 3 years ago
there is no such thing as a belief in evolution.
'The evidence is looked upon with "belief glasses" '
thats creationist Ken Ham with his 'biblicsl glasses' i think you will find. IT not our fault that reality confirms evolutions predictions of what we should find.
Erech01 3 years ago 2