Added: 3 years ago
From: GERONAMI
Views: 1,330
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (216)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • GERONANI is a BIGOT, FLAG this and ALL his videos for HATE SPEECH,He is a HATE MONGER as he HATES JEWS,MUSLIMS,HINDU'S,BIDDHISTS­,ENVIROMENTALISTS and my favourite POOR PEOPLE, FLAG this and ALL his videos.

  • lovewithgeronami

  • I differ with your writing that Gene Robinson (a sinner) is the "ultimate low point" in the Christian church. Rather when the Catholic church acted as if they could take the power of salvation from Jesus or Psalms 51:17 and thus pretended they had the power to shorten the hand of God Himself the ultimate low point was achieved.

    We are all sinners, but Gene Robinson needs Psalms 51:17 and so does every sinner. Every sinner needs salvation which comes from God.

    I am not ashamed of the gospel

  • As Bill Maher says " We gays Should Forget about Civil Rights and Make Gayness A Religion" and He Adds "W e Are Kneeling Anyway"

    Seriously, It's time to make Gayness A Religion and let's say We arent having Sex, but Performing A Private Mass/Communion :)

    And His Rod and Staff is Comforting me in The Lush Green Fields akin to The Garden of Eiden :)

  • You have a point. If all forms of religious nonsense are granted protection in this country, probably the best way for gays to gain the marriage rights they deserve is to redefine their orientation as a religion. I would laugh hysterically at how irate that would make Christians. I guarantee you they would not be for freedom of religion then!

  • Certainly. Bill Maher in His Tribute to Jerry Falwell stated the same. And it's easy to start A Religion.

    I had a Vision last night, the blessed mother virgin Mary came into my dreams and said it's high time to take away the high ground from The Apologists and give it to 24 hour Party People.

  • Let's say I'm Christian and your religion is Voodoo. It won't hurt my faith one bit that your religion is Voodoo or your sexual orientation is being gay, and that is also your religion. My belief that the word 'marriage' is between a man and a woman will not change due to your gay religion. A union between gays is not a marriage, and if your religion claims a lie, it still is not a marriage but rather a gay union, so call it what it is.

  • I dont belong to Vodoo Religion. But, being Gay I am Highly Impressed by Wicca.

  • The Catholic church used to call anyone a heritic for believing contrary to the church, yet many of their beliefs come from pagans,rather than true Christianity. Galileo was persecuted for believing the earth was round. Anything they don't understand is of the devil. Religions cause wars and Jesus saves, and gays go to hell.

  • It's The same with Every Christian Branch. Bertrand Russel in His Most Notable Work "Why I am NOT A Christian"stated "Each Scientific Progress has been Opposed by Every Organized Church in The World"

  • I don't think every church has oppressed each scientific progress. On the contrary the Seventh Day Adventist Church, and the Latter Day Saints are just two churches that lead the way in scientific studies.

  • Yeah, The Latter Day Saints Church did Conduct Research and You know what Their Findings are?

    The Native American Indians are A Lost Tribe of Israel!!! We know, it's Nothing but Crap. The DNA Analysis has shown that this is A Lie Propogated by LDS Church.

    The LDS Church also propogated and said it has Evidence that Cain took Ape as a Wife and thus came the nigger race.

    oh yeah, way to lead Scientific Research.

  • First of all does anyone really believe anyone could be lost from God? It would be their choice, not God not knowing. I don't know that much about LDS though, although I know some LDS and I don't think they believe some of the things yu mentioned.

  • if you dont think it's true, then you are Negating History.

  • Dear, I humbly submit to You that I have NO issue in You being A Christian or A Marxist or A Pagan or A Muslim. But, Asserting Your View Point alone to correct and others to False is Insidious to Mankind. Have You forgotten The Story of The Tax Collector and The High Priest mentioned in Your Bible?

    The Tax Collector Humbly prays to The Almighty while The High Priest Boasts of Himself and His Services and The Bible states it's The Tax Collector's Humble Prayer by which God was Impressed

  • This Geronimo guy is a joke. LOL! Get this: presidents should be putting their hand on the CONSTITUTION when they take the constitutionally prescribed oath, not the Bible. They are to defend this country and the people's RIGHTS (The Bill of Rights, get it?) not a god. We should be more like France and keep God in churches and out of government. Oh, I just heard this nutcake say gays are intolerant. Aint that the pot calling the kettle black. The oppressed are the intolerant ones. BIG LOL!

  • I am no Christian but I have complete respect for all who pursue alignment with God. The Corinthian quote from Geronami only proves that true spiritual people should NOT get themselves dirty in politics. We do NOT separate ourselves from the unclean world by trying to change it to our liking. That's my position as a spiritual seeker. As an American citizen, however, it is none of my business who wants to get married to who, nor is it yours. Peoples' rights are not determined by popular vote.

  • If you are a spiritual seeker, I suppose you are not materialist.

    So you should have some kind of beliefs regarding after life.(obvious spiritual stuff ).

    then you should have some kind of concern between do's and don'ts, Bible talks about Judgement, So it should be our business to be concerned of the people who are doing the very 'don'ts'.

    Don't you think so?

    'Separation' doesn't mean a the loss of passion for changing the world. It means to keep ourselves from the don'ts.

    God bless.

  • You are correct. It is our duty to keep ourselves from the don'ts. My point is that it is NOT our business to deny other Americans of their right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, so long as they're not harming us. I do not recall ever being harmed by a gay/lesbian person and I've encountered quite a few. If you have a specific belief system which requires you to attempt to counsel others, fine. But if they resist, you have no right to press it as at that point, you are meddling.

  • No one is going after gay community to kill them(except islam). If gay marriage is constitutionalised the very meaning of family (wife, husband & children) is distorted.

    even animals recognise the importance of male-female union for a family. it's not we meddling their lives, it's them meddling the community. truth is community-chaos. family-chaos.

    Bible says we will be judged according to Gods standard. I don't think any christian wants the fellow brother/sister being eternally punished.

  • Not a word in the Constitution about marriage and that's how it should stay. Marriage is a personal religious institution. Explain how gay marriage distorts YOUR meaning of marriage? Doesn't change mine at all. Marriage is between two people who chose to devote their lives to each other. Their view of God and marriage is up to them and does not need to justify itself before some government. That's the American way. Spiritually, render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. None of our business.

  • 'Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh'. Gen 2:24

    No religion defines a marriage as union of 2 persons, what about marriage of 3 or 4 persons, where is this going?.

    and what about reproduction?, it's destructive way for human race. It's a blind fold, how can't you see such an obvious flaw in humanity. it is problem, those people need help and support, not justification or encouragement.

  • No American is bound by the Bible if they don't believe in it, only those that do. Gays/lesbians represent only about 5% of the population. They're no threat to me or my way of life. The group of 3 or 4 people that want to get married (never heard of them)represent a microscopic percentage so they can do whatever their belief system requires. A similar argument to yours was made fifty years ago about how inter-racial marriage would destroy everything. Wrong.

  • You are wrong. Trying to redefine a word in the dictionary may or may not work, but in the case of gays redefining the word "marriage" it will never mean fagging out. Gay people are not happy. Too bad. They make their choice.

  • Maybe living in the land of the free and yet not being permitted to be yourself causes sadness? Being gay is not a choice. I don't "choose" to be attracted to women, it just happens. There's no thinking involved. "Duh...I wonder if I think I should be attracted to that pretty woman over there...duh." When did you choose to like women? What "choice" did YOU make? It happens by itself. So why then do you think being gay is a choice? Cause your religion can't handle the strange truth of gayness.

  • Actually my frontal lobe as well as the lymbic system and my conscious, sub conscious and unconscious minds all are atracted to women and I know it isn't all my idea, but sometimes it is. Since I was born women have loved me, and I didn't ever give that much thought until I had strong urges for female companionships. Now children are going through their lives being indoctrinated to be gay, and arguing whether it is a choice or not.

  • To put it simply - attraction is NOT a choice. Not for you, me, or any fag or lesbian. Tell me of a situation where you CHOSE to be attracted to a woman? I wanna hear this one...

  • Some people don't get aroused naturally, but rather by strange acts only, which is psychological rather than biological. This is refered to as fetishistic conditioning. It is absolutely learned.

  • I'm not talking about sex. That's later in the mating sequence. I'm talking about attraction. Who we are attracted to is NOT a choice for you, me, or any fag or lesbian. But you're stuck, because if you admit this truth, then it becomes obvious that being gay is not a choice. It may be weird, sick, or whatever to you and me, but it's NOT a choice. The Bible doesn't deal with this truth any better than it can fix your car. Who we are attracted to has more of God's input on it than our own.

  • Stimulus and response is something different to attraction. Also, what someone says and does may not be the same, and especially so for gays.

  • Is it your Theory? One Doesnt Respond Without Stimulus. Can You please tell me in Which school did you get your education?

  • What one person thinks is a reward may not be a reward to someone else. What reinforces behavior is observed by response not from stimulation. Dah..

  • you need to study Genetics again.

    It's Clearly Biological and any Psychological factor you mention is triggered because of Biological Reasons.

    And I Dont understand what you mean by Strange?

    Can anything be more strange or stupid then A Drunk Passed Out Man getting Aoused? and sexually, can anything be more ImMoral then Father Pimping His Daughters to The Whole City and later Impregnating Them?

  • CribNotes, lets say some group decides it is their right wear their dirty underware over their work clothes.  Now that same group files discrimination charges due to employers not giving them the same chance as people that wear their underware correctly. They see it as being singled out as a group, instead of as their choices made have consequences. (Analogy) Marriage is not between gays, but rather between male and female. A union between same sex lovers is not marriage.

  • Great analogy...sure. Being gay is not a choice. Maybe some freaks want to try it out but a friend of mine told me his 13 year old son just came out gay and I had to agree. I remember this kid prancing around the house with a ballerina costume on when he was four. Only an idiot would believe he "chose" to be gay at that age.

  • Cribnotes, if what you say is true that a four year old boy was acting feminine, it shouldn't be any great surprise, after all the youth are indoctrinated by TV and later school and older siblings that gay is acceptable, and many of their roll models such as teachers and priests are gay, but nowhere in the Bible does it say gay is acceptable, and teaching children to be gay is a form of pediphilia.

  • You can go ahead and try to rationalize it to make it understandable to a primitive Christian mindset, but the truth is this 4 yr old didn't even know the meaning of gay. NOBODY taught him "gay stuff", he just did it. Jesus never talked about gays. The only hardcore stuff you find in the Bible about gays is in Leviticus, which is a complete joke if you read the whole thing. As if God likes the smell of burnt animals offered to him. Totally twisted stuff written by cavemen there in Leviticus.

  • Cribnotes, I am not just trying to rationalize. I am answering you with truth. Read I Corinthians 6 and Romans 1. These are both in the New Testament. The Bible is clear on the fact that gay behavior is not acceptable. Mothers that let boys chose to act feminine do so becasue they lack propper affections.

  • So now you're ready to tell other parents how to apply proper affections? Should his mom beat him with a stick because the 4 yr old dances like a fag? Ridiculous. You have not answered with the truth. I already caught you in one lie. You couldn't answer my question. Tell me of a situation where you willingly CHOSE to be attracted to a woman, as you say you have sometimes.

  • Because gays nurture being gay they are gay.

    We are over populated with gays because it is time for sodom and gamorah to be destroyed again. Empires crumble when gays want to marry. Babelon Medes and Persians, Greeks, Romans and now the U.S.

  • you are speaking utter non sense. so you believe in earth being created in six days and that prayers can stop the motion of Sun And oh Yeah, The Sun Moves around Earth.

    A Heaven and Hell. If there is A Lake of Fire(Hell), Please show where it is. Dont Quote Bible. But show Scientific Proof.

    Anyway, is being Gay a greater Sin then Praciticing Incest.

    Are you aware that Abraham, The Father of The Three Desert Cults married his half Sister?

  • If you want to talk to me like an adult, then maybe I will respond later. You obviously are biased against the God of Abraham and you are gay. I don't think there is anymore to discuss with you. However my oppinion is that people are going to become more and more intollerant of gays, especially as they associate gays with disease and a segement of society that is less than normal.

  • Certainly, God of Abraham is the worst character in The Whole of Fiction.

    The Biggest Disease is Homophobia.

  • People tend to believe what they want to if it suits their life-style or not. I would say homophobia is not a disease, but rather a natural reaction, to an un-natural behavior.

  • Did you know that studies have shown that homophobic men are more likely to be stimulated/aroused by gay pornography than men who are not homophobic? In other words, if you're homophobic, especially violently homophobic, you are more likely to be a latent homosexual yourself. Think Ted Haggart.

  • Cribnotes we can only imagine what kind of studies it would have to be, and that type of an arguement illogical, because the tester would have to be gay and if someone would volunteer to the test they would also have to be gay. However, if a homophobic person fallows their gut warning their fear might save them from someone trying to push a gay trip on them.

  • You have the test subjects fill out a questionnaire regarding their viewpoints on homosexuality. Then you strap some sensors on their bodies monitoring heart rate, blood pressure, sweating, etc.. Then you show them some gay photos. The more homophobic you are, the more likely you will exhibit signs of sexual response while viewing these photos. Straight guys like me who are not homophobes are less likely to show physical signs of sexual response.

  • It's obvious gays and hetrosexuals will respond differently to the same stimulus, however, as a rule, the more highly controlled the experiment, the less generally applicable the results. For instance emotional reactions to the photos are tied to the limbic system which is tied to the fight -flight response so anger could be confused with sick gay urges. Observing for an erection & some people would not become erect whereas others it would cause an erection due to thinking about it/Unreliable!

  • I understand your point. However, back in the 80's, there were some sickos with baseball bats who would jump out of their cars and attack gays waiting in line to get in a night club. Baseball bats??? What would Freud have to say about that?

  • When someone commits a violent act against another it is usually a response, whether justified or not yet it is often provoked. I remember when I was younger and gays would bother me and I would flee, and when I see gays bother youth now and someone sticks up for the gays doing so I consider them worse than the gays. If Freud equates everything with sex and baseball bats as phallic symbols, maybe that is their way of raping a pediphile.

  • They pull up in a van, jump out with baseball bats and beat some fags waiting in line at a club because they were "provoked"? I'm sorry, these are vicious closet homos who can't think of any other way to use their dicks.

  • I don't know anything about the people that jumped out of the van with baseball bats to beat up faggots, so it would be almost presumptious for anyone to interpret what the provocation if any was. However, there might not have been any, other than a way of dumping on a scapegoat. Everyone needs a scapegoat now and then. That is the lynch mob mentality. Same with people that dangerously slow down to see injured bodies in a wreck, or especially the ones that provoke such injuries on others.

  • To me, homophobia and homosexuality are two sides of the same coin. Both seem to be obsessed with the other.

  • AndhraPolitical,

    Bertand Russel is a mathematician not a historian one can trust. The church supported scientific progress and we benefit today by it.

    Some people in the church opposed a few pieces of information due to not being aware of the significance or insignificance of whether the Earth revolved around the sun.

    Little else was worried about by the church other than evolution which has shown no control over new species yet.

  • You realize of course that out of the entire population, the people least likely to catch AIDS are lesbians. Does that mean God favors them in some way? People are only becoming more intolerant of gays because 1)They are standing up for themselves regarding basic rights we all should enjoy and 2) Various preachers out there are stoking the fires of homophobia because they know it leads to more money on the collection plate.

  • Here goes another one of your psuedoscientific postulations. Lesbians and AIDS and collection plates. Somehow I don't think lesbians are the least likely group of people to get AIDS, out of the entire population.  Some gulable girl might beleive that until she is informed by her doctor otherwise. Maybe mentioning at church that gays are carriers of diseaes might not be such a bad idea.

  • No need for a science degree. AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease and lesbians are the least likely to catch it. Period. ANY preacher knows which types of sermons draw the biggest collections. No science degree needed to understand why. You just have to understand sales and marketing.

  • We are overpopulated by homophobes stirred up by preachers who overemphasize an imaginary gay problem in order to drive donations to their churches. Preachers know which issues bring in the money. Gay overpopulation? I would estimate that only 5% of the society is gay. About 1 in 20 and I can spot one quick. Empires are usually destroyed by bad banking and over expansion of power around the world. That's the true danger to America. Not a bunch of fags dancing around. Read the news.

  • I think homophobia is a perfect reaction, unfortunately it is such a sick problem it serves as a perfect diversion for power corruptions and the economical manipulations, that are intended to lower the standards of society. Soon government will want to force religion on everyone, and they do this by pressing all the right buttons to manipulate the people, through media, economics and politics of FTC et el....

  • You've nailed a big point here. Two issues - abortion and gays - have diverted too much of church people's attention away from issues that really matter to the future success of our society.

  • Those two "issues" used as stimulus to get the response they want, which isn't to improve society. Laws don't prevent gays from being gay or even prevent abortion. Society should want to protect young mothers from underground abortions, which could easily be prevented with councelling and guidance. Gays have been lied to by the church so long that God loves gays so it is okay, but that is not true. God loves everyone and accepts them the way they are. He changes us if we allow that change.

  • I think TV is a good example of programming parents how not to act. Watch any sitcom and the conflicts are between ishues that should not even be addressed in family viewing such as gay issues or getting away with some diception of some type.

  • There's all kinds of people out there raising kids. If you don't like a TV show, don't watch it. I doubt many parents take their cues from watching sitcoms.

  • Advertisers that sponsor TV broadcasting only need 90 seconds, so since the gays agendas are on every channel, it would be ludicrous to think they aren't making an influence on impressionable minds after hours of that nonsense. A lot of this is cartoons. Kids want to watch whatever they are told they can't watch, so the questionable stuff should not even have to be a question on the air waves.

  • Gay behavior is not acceptable to Christians. But if you are not a Christian, you are not bound by such prohibitions. The USA is based on our founding documents - the Declaration, the Constitution, and Bill of Rights. Only those documents are permitted to be used to govern this nation. The Bible is for the spiritual life of those who choose it only. For the general people in America, only the founding docs apply. Gays only want to be guaranteed the basic rights we ALL enjoy here as Americans.

  • You claim gays only want to be guaranteed the basic rights we ALL enjoy here as Amnericans, not true. We don't need the word marriage to be redefined to mean anything other than a union between a man and a woman, therefore a union between gays should not be called a marriage but rather a union between gays. (A fag-union). A fag-union then would entitle gays to divorce one another, the same as hetrosexuals do.

  • Of course! And what would be funnier than a gay divorce? What a TV show that would make! "Marriage" vs "Union" who cares? Do they want to get married or unioned? The definition of marriage between two people, who intend to get married, is whatever they say it is. None of my business.

  • CribNotes Most people act like the government should own us all and that more and more laws need to be made to force people to be good. I think freedom should be legal instead of illegal! However, gay rights should not infringe on hetrosexual society or individuals. Textbooks should not be used to indoctrinate impressionable children to accept gay behavior, especially with all the STDs. I think a gay union should be called a gay union rather than a marriage.

  • There's no such thing as gay rights! The only rights in question are those under the Declaration, the Constitution, and Bill of Rights. The rights guaranteed to any man under these documents do not infringe on the rights of anyone else. That's a fantasy. If gays want to call their union a marriage, it's none of my business to insist otherwise.

  • But if the government gets to tell us what a marriage is, then they do own us. Marriage is not about men/women, fillies or geldings, cows and bulls. Nothing sacred about that. Marriage at its highest is about two people who are pledging their lives to each other. The government has no business in this. It's spiritual.

  • Marriage is between a man and a woman not between same sex or animals or whatever other union, so government doesn't have the right to say now marriage is anything other than what it is. A union between same sex or human and animal or whatever other perversions is not a marriage. Passing laws against such perversions may not be enforceable and even then force does not work. The person must change because they want to.

  • Here's another example of an extra definition of the word "marry" which you should try to stop before it destroys our society. In a restaurant, ketchup bottles look better when they are full, so the waiters gather the bottles of ketchup together after the shift and pour the half-empty bottles together to make full ones. This process is called "marrying the ketchup bottles". I believe if ketchup can get married in the English language, so can gays and lesbians.

  • You can believe whatever you want to, but that doesn't make it right or true. Besides most people don't know what they believe. If you compare what they say with what they do, there is a large margin of incongruency between saying and doing. By there behavior ye shall know them.

  • "You can believe whatever you want to, but that doesn't make it right or true." Same statement applies to you, right? Therefore, it's not much our business what our neighbor is doing as long as he isn't bothering me. If two gays want to get "unioned" (sounds stupid, doesn't it?), then they can call it a "bar mitzvah" and do it. None of our business. You seek to control fags, I do not care what they do, and neither does the Bill of Rights.

  • Excellent video GERONAMI! We really are in the midst of a culture war that is a social reflection of the personal choice that must be made between righteousness and wickedness. Everyone knows homosexuality and lesbianism are filthy, the problem is that some people choose to be filthy. There is forgiveness, restoration, transformation, salvation, power, peace, and joy in JESUS CHRIST if you will change your mind about sin and ask Him to take His proper place as King and God in your life.

  • you are filthy

  • Gays have the right to marriage, they can choose to be gay or not be gay and marry or not marry, but marriage is between a man and a woman according to the inventor of marriage.

  • lets say gays marrage is gmarrage or anything else but not marrage.

  • Suryak76 you are right, we need to understand laws against gay marriage is ludicrous because gays and their cow tow sympathizers will always oppose such laws, so call it what it is GAY marriage or fagging out, not marriage! In fact that might be in the best interest of everyone, but the gays have been lied to by so many cow towing hypocrits that are probably gay closet cases.

  • oh?

    who invented marriage?

    your imaginary sky daddy?

    to whom is he born? what is his skin colour?

    how does he look? what are his facial characeters? whats his size?

  • AndhraPolitical you seem to be more full of asking questions than of finding answers, and if you are really that ignorant do you really think any explanation to you would suffice? The truth is the creator invented marriage and says it is between a man and a woman. He also said that gay behavior is not to be approved. Thanks for the opportunity to expla8in the truth. Glad to help.

  • Churches that don't fully support the word of God are apart from the body of Christ. They deceive many with their appeals to emotion.

  • yeah, so churches should support Slavery.

    And Dont Forget, Slavery is Sanctified by The Church irrespective of Their Denomination.

  • So explain why you think the church sanctifies slavery. I sure don't and I'm a Christian. What church are you referring to?

  • The Pope has time and again Reiterated that Slavery is Ordained by Christ and Pagans have to be slaves of The God's Men. ofcourse, post conversion of Coloured people to Christianity, slavery took the shape of racism.

    The one whom you call as Mother teresa, has stated "Poor People Should take it as their fate and serve The Rich without Question"

    and you call her a noble soul. shame up on you lowlifes.

  • The Pope is the AntiChrist, and all reformers know this.  In the Bible the Books of Daniel are clear on this. First Babelon ruled by Nebechednezar, then The Medes and Persians, the next world power was Greeks then Rome. When this was written it was prophesy but now that it happened it is history proving the Bible true. Vatican City in Rome represents Church rule, London City mammon and Washinngton District of Columbia War. These 3 kingdoms are beasts.

  • Second, from what or where are you citing Mother Teresa? She's a lot more noble of a soul than most people anyway. Interesting you call her a low life along with everyone else who disagrees with you. Her life was about helping the lowest of classes. She's done a lot more for the poor than you ever will.

  • Really.

    During The Great Bengal famine when over 4 million people died, she Didnt Serve The Poor and The Hungry, but sided with The British. Reason, The British Imperialists were of her faith -- Christianity. When asked about what she fels of The British Raj and Their Atrocities on Indians, her answer : Forgive. Forgive the Rape and Piliage? oh yeah. One should forgive because it's the christians who perpetuated. right?

  • okay. I accept I should Not have called Mother Teresa, a lowlife. But, She isnt the Great Soul you project as

  • The previous 2 messages were directed at AndhraPolitical. Sorry about that.

  • Obviously I'm having difficulties...

  • First of all, I don't follow what the pope says. He's not the main voice of Christianity. So you shouldn't base the Christian faith from the words of that man. And what pope are you talking about anyways? By the way, slavery didn't take the shape of racism. Racism has been a part of slavery all along.

  • Pope including the current papl who served under Hitler has approved slavery. your mother teresa is a great poponent of slavery and in her interview to Christopher Hitchens she advocated that poor people should without question serve the rich as it is mandated by God.

    NO Christian has ever contested any of The Pope's Remarks.

    When Evangelized Romans treated The Pagan Western Europeans as slaves and have put them through confession was it Racism? NOPE