Added: 3 years ago
From: AgentJayZ
Views: 602,558
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (253)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THANKS FOR GLOBAL WARMING EARTHQUAKES STORMS WIND AND RAIN

  • @bobodd5 Earthquakes? ... that, and the all capitals thing indicates the level of understanding posessed.

    Thanks for your input...

  • @bobodd5 stay in the dark ages fool

  • Any issues with the mesh in front of the bell mouth causing compressor stalls at all? Must create merry hell with the airflow

  • @K1w1scot It's designed to have minimal effect. Pressure at the inlet is measured and compared to ambient, and the two are compared to get the loss caused by the safety screen. Small, but used in calculation of power generated.

  • Running it on propane? What is the starter running on? Air, electric?

  • @Ilicium The Olympus has a hydraulic starter. More views of it in my other olympus videos.

  • @AgentJayZ Really? Have to look. I have been wondering something. In engines like the LM2500, how do fuel/hydraulics like the VSV system work without liquid fuel pressure when running on propane?

  • @Ilicium In the industrial engines, the VSVs are run with power from a separate pump, but it is pumping the engine lube oil.

    So the oil system has two pressure pumps at least, delivering oil through filters to the VSV system as well as the bearings, and several scavenge pumps returning the oil through filters to a remote reservoir

  • @AgentJayZ Thanks for the info. Always interesting to see how the engineering problems are handled.

  • yeaaah im a freak!

    i love that!

  • i want a rolls royce jet engine for my rolls royce phantom!

  • @TheRguru1 The "Rolls Royce" Phantoms actually used Speys. Two Olympus engines wouldn't fit.

  • @AgentJayZ Speys? WTF R THOSE?

  • @TheRguru1 Rolls Royce afterburning turbofans... also the current wold land speed record holding engine. Two of them in Thrust SSC. Also the subject of a couple of engine test videos I have up...

  • @AgentJayZ oh, i understand!

  • @AgentJayZ Er - I think he means thr RR Phantom as in the motorcar, not the McDonnell heavy fighter.

  • @AgentJayZ you know he was joking right?!

  • I can tell 4 of them mounted on one plane is pretty dangerous -- Just like mounted on the Concorde. quite a powerful engine.

  • I want my car to sound like this when starting up.

  • didnt concorde have Rolls Royce Olympus mk2

  • .01 mpg?

  • @ShadowGKCP less than that. It's bolted to a stationary frame.

  • @AgentJayZ ahaha i get it

  • @AgentJayZ Lmao, smartass.

  • @AgentJayZ even if it wasn't, it likely would be GPM not MPG!

  • description said Vulcan has afterburner....vulcan didnt use afterburner, except one with had 5 engines. 4 normal and 1 olympus with AB, used as a testbed

  • @abhiginimav You are correct...

  • Is This the engine of the Concorde?

  • @GTADriver64 This is an industrial Olympus more closely related to the engines in the Vulcan Bomber. The 593, used in the Concorde was a more powerful development. Plans to create an industrial version of the 593 were never carried out by Rolls Royce. The GE LM2500 has largely taken over the market niche that the industrial Olympus was competing for.

  • Thats a big turbojet!!!!!!!!

    

  • I felt like hot air was coming to my nose when the turbine was raising rpm and was recorded from aside and was like "what is that smeel? Something's burning up."

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!

  • Is it large amounts of videos about aviation on youtube, and barely anything from other lines of work? Or am I just subconsciously drawn to these...

  • @snehesten I don't know... I started putting up engine test videos in 2007 because at that time all I could find were videos on the little RC engines.

  • yup. the british airways supersonic Concorde had four of those engines

  • My father woeked on the 593 at filton for concorde in the 70's

    Nice to hear the music again

  • How the heck am I supposed to fit THAT on my bike?

  • Yes, no industrial though, Marine engines only, mainly Oly, Tyne & Spey, our Navy still use them and a lot of Foreign navies, we also had some input over the last couple of years on the only Vulcan they have managed to get flying again, see video: pity won't let me post the link, if you Google: 'Bruntingthorpe Vulcan' it will bring up plenty of info and videos of it.

  • Nice to see one of our engines still going out there I probably worked on that very engine in one way or another being that I am based at the place named on the first nameplate, we still repair and overhaul these engines as I did the Vulcan Oly and that was in the early '70's!

  • @TheQuicksilver580 I think that's fantastic. I was not aware the RR still supported these.

    Good to hear from you.

  • The afterburning engine Vulcan's had too many crashes in the early 1960's.

  • The Olympus Vulcan was not around too long like the Vulcan's we know today that were used in service from the 1950's until the early 1990's when they were retired.

  • what olympus' are these

  • @johnp94 This one is an industrial Mk 2022. It's related to the engines in the Vulcan, but it was designed for use in power generation and ship propulsion.

  • @AgentJayZ aaah cool however you cannot beat the olympus 201 engines at full power with the famous howl

  • I thought it had an after burner!!

  • @MrATWX was used on concorde and the vulcan

  • Also used to power ships!

  • hey thanks for the video. I'm studying aeronautical engineering and wanted to see inlet guide vanes in action. cleared up what i wasn't sure about. good work fella.

  • very good in ships

  • @MrATWX The VC-10 used the Conway, which was about half the size of an olympus. The Conway was one of the first bypass engines, also known as turbofans.

    The olympus was a turbojet, with no bypass airflow.

  • @AgentJayZ The Conway was the first bypass engine, as well as being totally developed by Rolls-Royce where the Olympus was a Bristol engine.

    But thats the Industrial engine, so this was tailored to ground usage - for example in the UK - they were used in Power Stations as auxilliary generator sets.

  • Isn't that what was on the Concorde?

    

  • @ahart55301 This is an industrial version more closely related to the non-afterburning Olympus used in the Vulcan bomber.

    The Concorde used the Mk593, which was upgraded in many ways to be a more powerful engine... and then it was blessed with an afterburner ( "reheat" in RR-speak)

  • @AgentJayZ The Olympus Vulcan did actually use rolls royce 4 afterburning engines briefly in the late 1950's and early 1960's until it was retired in 1965. In fact these engines were the precursor to the afterburning engines used in the future Concorde.

  • @ahart55301 yes, Rolls Royce Snecma Olympus 593's to be precise.

  • how much is for the Olympus?

  • @slowshow111

    from a previous answer: Anywhere from the price of a car to a house, depending on engine configuration and modifications ordered.

    Call Brian at Maddex Turbine services Ltd.

    or

    Robin at S&S Turbine services Ltd.

    Both companies have websites.

    Each has a wide variety of engines at very reasonable prices.

  • @slowshow111 Oh Man, Maybe, $AU One Million Dollars of each Or More, I don't know , you ask Rolls Royce Company Boss. maybe

  • how much is for that power plant?

  • I just went from 6 tom midnight

    

  • "The Olympus is the engine used in the Concorde, and the Vulcan Bomber. Both used four Olympus engines, each with an afterburner".

    Sorry, none of the Vulcan Olympus types had afterburner fitted. The Vulcan had provision for RATO (Rocket assisted take-off) pods; I never saw them in use though. The RATO units could be fitted between 1 and 2 engines on the port side, and 3-4 on the starboard side.

  • ahhh the x-files again!!! ahhh! lol. awesome! i love jet engines! so powerful!!

  • Thats a really sick noise it makes when its first starting - like the Deathstar:D

    The complete plant must have a lot more stuff added to it, such as a silencer (please!), inlet air cleaner and so forth, not to mention perhaps heat recovery for cogeneration (it must produce enough waste heat to warm every home in my town!).

    Also, can I buy direct? I can ruin soo many neighbours garden parties playing with this baby in my shed:D

  • @TheMrCJist Silencers, yes. When a modern natural gas fired powerplant is running six or more of these engines, the noise outside the facility can be barely noticeable.

    Co-generation is one way of improving overall plant efficiency.

    And yes, we have an Olympus for sale right now.

    Also RR Avons, Speys, GE LM1500s, and Orendas.

    Call us at 250-785-5272 for GE Products

    or 250-262-2030 for Rolls Royce.

  • @AgentJayZ

    I think I would need to sell the car, remortgage the house, pawn every item I own, get a second job. not have any living expenses for the next ten years and rewind the credit crunch with a time machine to just about own one of these babies.

    I like the company name - Maddex turbine services. Because mail ordering a real Concorde engine as an adult toy (not that kind!) and letting the missus know you paid for it will make her hopping mad and very likely an 'ex' in short order . :D

  • Im looking to go into a field just like this...would this be considered Aerospace Engineering?

  • Sounds like Thunderbird 2 lol

  • Designed and made by Bristol Aero Engines, so Bristol Olympus (or at least it was originally). RR took over support when all British aero engine production was centralised by the last labour government but one.

  • at 0:17 it sounds like, don't mess with me

  • I wish i understood these damn how do they start? how much air is coming out of that what type of power is in this thing

  • arn't these the same tipe of engine on the b 52

  • @AirShowFan22 No, the B-52 has had a couple of different engines throughout its history, and there has been talk of fitting them with four turbofans.

    Rather than repeating what is already out there, I suggest you check out any of the great B-52 sources out there.

  • @AirShowFan22 no B-52's use pratt&whitney turbojets and turbofans [turbojets are on older models]

  • so which were louder, concord or vulcan engines?

  • @Mark1Spitfire i'm guessing the Concorde, because its Olympus 593 engines were much more powerful, and fitted with an afterburner.

    Compared to the Vulcan's non-AB Olys.

  • @Mark1Spitfire Concorde by far, you would to have had plugged your ears it's so loud. Very loud whine.

  • That engine has a very unique sound.

  • stinks nasty death pollute storm force wind rain more death fuck the oil companies surely they can invent something other than kerosene?

  • Is it only the automotive Rolls Royce parts that belong to BMW? Cause if aeronautic also belong to BMW, then I want this turbo in my M3 :P

  • @JeyOmatix Yes, Rolls Royce motor cars was split from Rolls Royce Ltd decades ago.

  • @AgentJayZ  Ok thanks ;)

  • @JeyOmatix I'm sure they could find a way to fit your M3 to one of these engines. You would have to pay cash up front of course & the funeral plan or an ejector seat would be optional. Fuel consumtion could be a slightly limiting factor to be considered on long trips as well. Will give new meaning to "Roast the opposition" though.(Wouldn't want to be behind you at the traffic lights!)

  • @Biggerbadwolf

    Hahaha!!! Well, long trips wouldn't be long anymore so even if the fuel consumption is as high as a Boeing, the time I'll take to get from A to B will so short that I'd probably be considered as "eco-friendly"

    ...Already chose my tombstone design! :D "RIP, roast in peace"

  • I know we have the 50.000 hp one at work overseas Rolls Royce and it is a nice one to run to 

  • testing is a part of manufacturing,the end process and to the customer.proof that the engine works.

  • Oly TM3Bs were used on Type 42 Destroyers,,,,,,awsum.....bit thirsty tho!!

  • The later series Olympus engines use an extra low pressure stage to increase overall thrust performance. The 593 was actually a whole new overhaul of the 320.

  • very good...very good.

  • are these surplus engines? i can't see a customer being happy about having an engine run up on youtube,

    otherwise very cool stuff. i'm amazed how close your control room is to the engine, i hope the glass is thick!

  • @chrismkay3 Part of the reason we show the test runs on Youtube is so the customer representatives who are not able to attend the actual test can see it.

    ...and really, what does surplus mean? Extra, not needed or wanted, of no use and so for sale at scrap prices...?

    No, none of the engines in my videos fit that description.

    They all have a job to do, and that's why money is being spent on keeping them running.

  • @AgentJayZ it's also pretty darn cool, though. I love the sound of an Olympus spooling up.

  • @AgentJayZ If you do have any vids of a Pratt & Whitney j-58 startup, could you please post it? I believe it requires a single 450 cubic metre chevy engine as a starter motor... You'll be knowing this but i'll just say it. Two of these lovely ladies were used on the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird...

  • There's a 320 going for £2,000,000 on Ebay.

  • Were these used on the Concord as well as the Avro Vulcan? If so, impressive engine.

  • @pelagic6 The engines in the Vulcan are closely related to this industrial version. The Concorde used Olympus 593's, which were updated and uprated... heavily hot-rodded versions of the Olympus which have quite a different appearance.

  • that starter motor sounds awesome...

    I WANT ONE LIKE NOW

  • @cheetawolf It's a Parker fixed ratio axial piston hydraulic motor, producing about 90 Hp.

    I think it's an F-11-10. They are a few grand.

  • Same turbine in gas plant process maracaibo lake venezuela...

  • man that hurts my ears

  • sounds orgasmic, which planes use this engine or will use

  • @dreamexecution Dont think they still use them now. But concorde used 4 of them :D

  • @dreamexecution The concord used to use 4 of these

  • this engine used to power concorde concorde was powered by 4 RR afterburning olympus engines to push her up to mach 2

  • That's cool, I didn't know they could be switched like that.

  • Wouldn't it be more efficient to use a marine turbine to get that 40,000 horsepower instead of an engine originally designed for thrust? Because those are designed for SHP not thrust. Or do the marine engines just cost that much more where it's not worth it?

  • @KI11YOU Dude... this is a marine/industrial Olympus.

    Both the industrial and the aero versions share the exact same gas generator section.

    Put a nozzle behind a gas generator, and you have a thrust engine.

    Put a power turbine behind a gas generator, and you have a turning output shaft.

    The gg, or "core", is the same for both.

  • Rolls Royce  does live up to its name. FANTASTIC

  • God that's a beautiful sound (start up)

  • the starter sounds like a tornado siren LOL

  • the price price goes from 60,000 to over 700,000

  • if my car had one of those(if it was legal), i would never be late for work again!

  • @penguinmaster7 you might want to pop on a couple of wings too

  • Anywhere from the price of a car to a house, depending on engine configuration and modifications ordered.

    Call Brian at Maddex Turbine services Ltd.

    or

    Robin at S&S Turbine services Ltd.

    Both companies have websites.

    Each has a wide variety of engines at very reasonable prices.

  • Very hard to test one of this engines, you will probably need 15 to 20 yeas of xp to get there. I'm going to be an A&P tech in about 1 year and this is my life.

  • Its always fun to see these engines bench tested. Several times been inside siemens formely alstoms of lincoln, who build and service gas turbines and test them in large armored rooms to destruction sometimes. their reliability is absolutely astounding, they are unbelievably good! but rarely they have had some eventually explode you could see the marks inside the room on the walls still lol

  • Nice video! I wanna ask you: this kind of engines are used in Boeing 737-200 comercial jets? I guess so cause it sounds alike.. sorry if what I´m asking you is kind of obvious, and my English is not good either.. but I enjoyed a lot this video so I wanted to comment on it

    Best regards

    Iván

  • The 737-200 used the Pratt & Whitney JT8D

  • Thanks!

    I love aircraft and trains. And I like very much to hear the startup sounds of the jet aircraft engines.. Keep posting this videos

  • @AgentJayZ i LOVE pratt&whitney! especally thier JT9D turbofans those are BEASTS of engines to bad most of the aircraft using the JT9D are retired due to age and the fuel consumption of the JT9D

  • @AgentJayZ yessir

  • @Ivanvideoscaseros5 The Boeing 737-200 used the Pratt & Whitney JT8D, a low bypass turbofan. 

  • i used to work for preci spark they make inserts for the static compressor blade and combustion chambers for the new trent series engines

  • What was the maximum thrust rating?

  • This engine does not produce thrust, but is an industrial powerplant rated at 25MW.

    I have seen some non-afterburning Olympus flight engines rated at 35,000 lbs thrust.

    The Concorde used a much-upgraded version of the Olympus, called the 593.

    An industrial version of that engine was designed, but never produced, and it was rated at 50MW.

  • well than wut is it used for??????????

  • All of the Olympus engines we have rebuilt so far have been from electrical generating applications.

  • so this isnt from a plane

  • I figured the Concorde used a Turbo Fan engine instid of a Turbo Jet. Just like that of the B-1 Lancer. Of course the 1st Lancer had engines that produced up to 37,000 pounds of thurst, but they were derated for the B1B.

  • All modern fighters use a low bypass turbofan, because it is more efficient, and the afterburner works even better because the combined exhaust flow from the core and the bypass has more available oxygen than the exhaust from a turbojet.

    The Olympus is one of the few dual spool turbojets out there.

    The P&W J57 is another.

  • The F/A 18 Hornet (A-D) was the only modern figher to use a Low by pass turbo jet engine (GE: F-404) each capabable of over 18,000 lbs thurst each. Of course with the Super Hornet; bought the use of a more, modern Turbo Fan (GE:F-414) So, therefore the legacy hornet is the only fighter used in the U.S Navy that uses engines simular to the older A-4 and F-4 Phantom jets.

    Cheers

  • The F-4 used two J79s, and the A-4 (most of them) used the J52.

    These are both single-shaft turbojet engines.

    The F-404 is a two shaft low bypass turbofan engine.

    The more powerful F-414 is a two shaft low bypass turbofan.

    I've always thought of the F-404 as a "modern" engine.

    I call the other fighter engines low bypass in comparison to the high bypass airliner engines.

  • actualy many fighters use turbofans. they make much more power and are much more efficent. because not all of the thrusting air and gas has to go through the compressor power and turbine sections of the engines it can come straight from the fan where it is still cold from altitude and doesent need to bend around inside the engine. all you need to do is slow the incoming air to below mach and let the engine gulp it up check out movalble ducts like whats on the f-15 its neat

  • I actually seen an F15C demo at an airshow years ago. Wasn't as loud as I thought it would be. Not like the thunderous F/A 18 hornet.

  • no the concorde is a turbo jet because in order to get a turbo fan to operate at altitude you have to slow the incoming airstream to a certian velocity before the engine can make any trust. a turbo fan can operate at a higher inlet velocity (still below sonic) but higher

  • I bet a Ram Jet could fix that problem. That was part of the technology used on the SR-71 Black Bird. As a matter of fact is was simular to a Turbo fan in which the motor had a fan-assisted ramjet.

  • @Skippy585 sort of. the engines used in the black bird were actualy a turbo jet untill about mach 3 then there were bypass tubes that fed ram pressure air from the pre compressor stage directly into the power section of the engine because the aircraft was moving so fast this gave the proper pressure wall for the burning fuel to push against (how jet engine basicly works is expanding fuel pushes against the pressure wall behind it expanding into the turbine section) thus becoming more efficent

  • Ok, so there in comming air was moved directly into the combustion stage of the engine. Yes it was acting more like a high by pass engine above mach 2.

  • The J58 in the SR71 did act as a ramjet above a certain speed. ( not sure of the transition point).

    Bypass is a term describing that portion of the airflow that is diverted around the combustors and turbines of the engine, also some of the compressor stages.

    The term does not apply to the J58, because when acting as a ramjet, all of the intake air is being mixed with fuel and burned in the combustion section.

    It is a very interesting design of engine. I'm not aware of any other like it.

  • my car need a upgrade!

  • So?

  • so what?

  • woooooooooooow I even had to lower the speaker volume right after ignition.

  • Saw a Vulcan at an airshow in Auburn, Maine. It was 1981. I believe the Vulcan was out of Waddington AFB in England. It was by far the LOUDEST aircraft I've ever heard. Gave me chills. Too bad the mighty Vulcan and also the Concorde are out of service. Shame. Any other planes use Rolls Royce Olympus engines? Didn't the Lockheed L-10111 use them? Is that airliner still in service.

  • The L1011 airliner used the Rolls Royce RB-211 hi- bypass turbofan.

    It was a new airliner that was the first to use a new engine, and the whole story is quite a tale.

    There's a good bit of it in the article on the L-1011 at Wiki...

  • I've seen the Vulcan fly up close and personal, she's a magnificent aircraft. And the howling sound of those Olympus engines really made my day when she came in for short final!

  • I was also lucky enough to see a Vulcan fly, at an airshow in Bellingham, Washington way back when.

    It was incredible at full power, but when it approached the field in what was called a stealth approach - engines at min power, it was silent until right on top of us.

  • also powered the TSR.2 back in 1964, the predesesor of Concorde´s Olympus

  • The TSR-2 Olympus' were quite different to the Vulcans, and Concorde's were a variant based on the TSR-2's.

  • at 0:17 it sounds like 'don't mess with me'

  • the olympus is wat powered concord

  • i love how its just a really expensive way of moving air

  • so concorde had around 160,000Hp dry? plus more with the reheat?

  • Sounds about right.

    There are a few different ways to look at how thrust translates to power.

    Mathematically, thrust is force, and force times distance over time equals power.

    Distance over time is speed.

    But thrust changes as the plane increases in speed.

    This engine, when used to generate electrical power, is capable of producing over 30 Megawatts of real, measurable power.

    746 watts per horsepower

  • There was one of these (well, the marine version, but not that far from this) in the Turunmaa class gunboats (corvettes) of the Finnish Navy. The propulsion system was state-of-the-art in the 60s.

  • I don't think I quite respected the size of the Olympus enough until now...

  • slap a seat on that shit and ride it around like a fuckin broomstick outa hell lol

  • Kick Ass

  • rpm reached?

  • Not as much as you might think.

    The Low pressure shaft gets to about 4,000 rpm, and the Hp gets to about 8,000 max.

    But it's big and heavy.

    The LP rotor is about 36 inches in diameter, and weighs close to a ton.

  • NO way only 4,000 to 8,000 RPMS, wow i always thought i would be like red line rpms more than 10,000 so i can rev up rpms in my car i beat a jet engine LOL

  • are these the rr bristol olympus engines as seen in the avro vulcan bomber?

  • The short answer is... YES.

    Rolls Royce purchased Bristol idontknowhowmany years ago, and the continued the development of the Olympus.

    Later they created the slightly modified industrial powerplant you see here.

    Very closely related.

    In fact, they dream of flying.

  • the olmypus engines were also on the concorde

  • Different model of Olympus, quite different.

  • why do you have it?

  • no i mean i wonder if your whole body would stick to it

  • With this engine, and our aluminum screen, you would stick to it for a fraction of a second, and then you would be taken, along with the screen, into the engine.

    We want to avoid that.

  • I love your videos dude!

  • can you jump onto the screen over the intake and stick to it?

  • Yes sure

  • Massive!!!

  • How does that not blow out your eardrums??

  • Earplugs are great, and some of us wear them inside our earcup-type hearing protection.

  • 0:09 = That 'wooo' sound lets you know this thing means business.

  • ... That would be the operator in the CAT skid-steer loader activating the high-flow hydraulic pump to drive the hydraulic starter motor to get the HP system spinning up.

    It's a tiny thumbwheel on the right-hand controller.

    Strange - to start a 40,000 Hp engine with a tiny movement of your thumb.

    Yes, we are unconventional, and we get things done in Jet City.

  • So how long does it take for this engine to spin up to full power?