Added: 3 years ago
From: bigtomscience
Views: 31,588
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @bigtomscience which pellet would be better for racoon hunting RWS domepoints or the RWS pointed nose both are 22 cal and shooting 800fps could you help??

  • @bigtomscience im a major fan of your vids and i am wondering if you could help me. my friend has a racoon problem and hes asked me to take care of it and he lives in town so i cant use a fire arm and i have a crosman gp thats a 22 cal and it shoots at an average of 760-800 and i have many pellets from RWS and i saw the review in the super h point you did but im tryin to decide if the dome pellets by RWS or the pointed nose would be better for hunting raccons thanks!!

  • how about showing the shooting instead th results. this is boring

  • I would like to know where you trained for this highly scientific test procedure that apparently is "artistic" and "goes way beyond ballistic gel".

    Probably the same place you acquired your sophisticated and erudite vocabulary.

  • Crowmagnum for the win. Wouldnt wanna eat a rabbit after hitting it with one of those though, rather not ingest all that lead :p

  • could you please do a pellet test in .25 caliber?

  • @mrhunterandzac those are hard to find in america, i hear they are popular in europe. If its legal may i make a suggestion, pay 180 bucks for a brand new heritadge rough ryder revolver, its a .22 and shoots all .22 caliber rimfires, and comes with a .22 magnum cyllinder. My bro and i can shoot the .22 subsonic short CCI's in our back yard and they are less quiet than any bbgun ive ever shot, sound like a red ryder, but they go through 2x4s.

  • hi what would you say is the best one

  • if think anyone dissing this guy should shut up he made a video to make us better educated on pellets and all you do is shit on him grow up for fuck sakes

  • lol hard ffs

  • This guys voice is the only reason I watched the whole video, Guy seems to think it is the COOLEST thing ever.

  • you need a chronograph

  • Well done big tomato - how bout you buy a .460WM and stop fuck assing around. Voice over sounded gay

  • this dude is gay /=?

  • and again by 1:03 did u see the crow mag? nasty ass hole them are my favorite 177 pellet they are nasty and very accurate 8.5 grain love em

  • they didn't all shoot at 800fps, distance affects speed as well as grain (weight). you would need to chrony test to know the accual speeds, as you may know the gamo raptor is made for higher velocity than pellet guns advertise.

  • Accuracy trumps over power every time. I use H&N FTT because they group the best and are most consistent. Who cares about penetration if you can`t hit the target?

  • super

  • how many more times do i have to say this. pellets need to be matched to the barrel of you'r gun. penitration and over all power count for nothing if the pellets will not hit within a 25mm (1") circle at 40 yards plus its usless. a better test of pellets will be over the crono and grouping over the flight line. use clear soap for penitration tests as it will tell you more about deformation and hydrolic shock.

  • if i was to buy any pellets it would be the beeman brand. in all the test vids i saw the beeman would go the deepest or penatrate.

  • penetration isn't everything. it's not inportant in huntng best evey pellet will penetrate.

  • can anyone recommend the best pellets i can use for my Weihrauch HW95K

  • Ask user Jordenkl he has that gun and loves it and will definalty be able to help you

  • Air Arms 'Field' for me in all of my gus, the JSB 'Exact' is reputed to be the same pellet, but I don't get the same results as the AA's (which are made by JSB)

  • H&N FTT

  • i sot me bakyard fence with a air rifle and it made a hole the same as my bros glock

  • thanks dud good video

  • god damn the mugen or something, hard hiting pellet is prety nasty, it broke a hude area...

    I like the gamo Raptor too gold and shitz...

    What about accuracity, is gamo raptor any accurate????????

  • I see some fags here, the user of this video is shooting with Airguns, not gunpowder guns u morons...

    Since u guys are smart, take ur firepower gun and shoot near someone's and u will see what happens, fucking noobs...

    With airguns u can shoot all day and no one will ever care bout it...

    U guys better aim ur gunpowder guns up ur asses and try shooting before saying anything about airguns...

  • hey nice vids man, i mean all of them. thanks

  • couldn't the results bee alittle off because of all the other damage the taped glass took?? Just wondering Not critizing (sp?)

  • Dude you are a fucking idiot with nothing better to do than leave negative comments on other peoples artistic videos... This was done with an air rifle you fool... I would knock you out clean if said that in public... Right donnie??? Dude,Fuck you fucking queer... Don't make it personal,cause I will torture you... bigtomscience

  • loOL

  • I can't legally shoot a .22-250 in my yard. Comprende?

  • Give me a break. The video is of such poor quality, and so little time is spent showing each impact, that it there is no way anyone could discern any difference among the shots, other than the one that penetrated fully.

    You're trying to tell me that this test is more accurate than using ballistics gelatin? What do you mean by "true quality"?? That is, in viewing this, I have no fucking idea which pellet is "better" than any other! He fails to convey any point whatsoever!

  • So, what's your conclusion? It's impossible to tell much from the video.

  • The conclusion is that I get to show you the viewer a difference in the energy transfers impact results on the taped glass medium. This goes way beyond ballistics gel penetration. I did that type of shit way long. Boring. Pure physics for all to see on the taped glass blast pattern... They are really quite different if you look close,like I have... Wise up friend and open your eyes to the difference that true quality can make... bigtomscience

  • @bigtomscience Yeah, sure, but it's hard from the video to compare them. I really like tests like this, but he's right, it is impossible to tell much.

    If you have already made clearer videos on this, then disregard my comment, but you need to show them all, and the differences and detail next time.

  • I agree with the guy above, I also need some kind of conclusion or verdict in this video, and you don't distinguish between the impact or the penetration energy in a way that eases the understanding - anyway your video are are great:-)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more