Added: 4 years ago
From: channelintel
Views: 19,058
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • why am i watching this?

  • Poor sound !

  • i got one of these at best buy the other day

  • I also live in the town Penryn, dead centre lol

  • I don't know if anyone cares, but the Penryn chip was named after a town. a town that I live in.

  • I was originally going to get the Q6600 for my new PC, but I'm now waiting on the Q9450. When released, the Q9450 won't be too much more expensive than the Q6600 and the Q9450 will have much better performance (Q6600 to Q9450: 65nm to 45nm, 2.40 GHz to 2.66 GHz, 1066 MHz to 1333 MHz, 8MB L2 Cache to 12MB L2 Cache). Compare the specs and wait for those new 45nm processors.

  • I'm going to wait for the q9450 too; cooler and according to tests 10-15% faster and 1333FSB.

  • y wait for that get the core i7 instead

  • I have the Q6600 but cause I have the G33-DS3R that supports 45nm and 1333Mhz FSB I'll be able to update :P

  • @ default q9450 is better than q6600. But q6600 has a higher multiplier (9 vs. 8)So if you want to overclock your CPU, then q6600 is better.

  • Exactly the same thing here. I was going to buy the Q6600, but then I heard about the Q9450 and had to get that instead. Faster, cooler, more efficient. What more could you ask?

  • Ill ban you

  • Cant wait til they get right down, and figure out how to avoid the quantum tunnelling issues with SETs, will make these transistors looks enormious in comparison, and by then, we wont really be able to make them any smaller!

  • lol AMD is the one falling behind rite now.

    Q6600 and QX9650 FTW

    The other quad cores will be released within a few weeks to a couple of months

  • Ohter meaning what? Other than q9450 and all, or? By the way I called Intel Canada today to confirm just for my satisfation and the guy told me that q9450 etc.. are already all set out being released, which means rumours on the net are false??

  • Whoa! 45nm already!

  • 2009 will host the 32nm processors! That's 1.9 BILLION transistors!!

  • 32 nm in mid 2008 don tbe afraid this is technology!!!!

  • TOO MUCH ECHHHHHoooooooooooooooooo!

  • near the end that sounded alot like an infomercial...?

  • 820 million transistors. awesome.

  • ? We don't care about your shitty program, it means nothing. Show us REAL benchmarks.

  • synthetic benchmarks are for cheaters.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more