The movie FITNA was made to misrepresent Islam by quoting half of Qur'anic verses out of context.
These verses of Qur'an were revealed at the time of war and every verse that enjoins the believers to fight is followed soon by the verse that enjoins peacemaking.
So the believer is asked to keep in mind for peace while he is fighting against oppression.
Geert Wilders cut off the peacemaking part of the verse and introduced loud music to make good part of the speech of scholar inaudible !
And I'm sure those well versed in the Qur'an would have been given the opportunity to explain the fallacies in Mr Wilder's logic to him, had he not been refused entry to the UK. I'm not defending Geert Wilder's position, I'm defending his freedom to hold and/or express an opinion, just or otherwise.
Muslims are not supposed to listen abuse about islam and Allah unless they have enough knowledge to defend
Most of the muslims learn the faith just for the sake of practice , not to debate ;the debate is supposed to be undertaken by scholars and I will send you video responses of muslim scholars Insha-Allah
Obstruction of the functions of a parliamentary house and threats of legal action against members are considered acts of contempt under UK law...
"Obstructing Members or officials in the discharge of their duty, threatening a Member with the possibility of legal proceedings for a Question asked in the House."
So, how exactly did someone threaten legal proceedings over a question or obstruct someone in their duties? Even if that was the case, is that really the same as treason? I don't think that it is.
Ahmed threatened legal proceedings against the peers who had organized the screenings, he also threatened to march 10,000 muslims into London to prevent Mr Wilders, an elected european parliamentarian from entering the House of Lords, this would be an obstruction.
It's not some UKIP peer's duty to have a movie screening party on the premises, crackpot. And even if Lord Ahmed was held in contempt, that's a far cry from treason. You pants-pissing Islamophobes are just a bunch of drama queens.
Islamaphobe.... oh dear, someone else bought into a propaganda buzz word... wondered how long it would be before that one came up.
The term assumes that no good person could possibly have valid concerns about the political agendas of any minority group. Let's use blanket insults like 'racist' or 'nazi' to obscure the point.
There is nothing irrational in fearing the growing influence of theocratic pressure groups or the barbaric moral standards that their teachings advocate.
Not exactly, it's you who lowered the argument to cat-calling. Duties are regardless, the rule of obstruction extends to all functions of the house, including the invitation of foreign politicians to discuss political issues. He's not exactly inviting his friends around to watch a movie, he raising questions and political debate in the light of Mr Wilders prosecution. A right reserved by the House of Lords for several hundred years, Ahmed is in breach of those freedoms of the house.
You were the one who made the accusations of treason and came up a little short. Furthermore, Lord Ahmed was released from jail two weeks ago on appeal of a charge of dangerous driving stemming from sending text messages, not drunk driving.
Oddly enough I used the phrase, 'an act little short of treason' in the video, nonetheless, his actions are acts of contempt against the ruling government of this country. Thank you for pointing out the driving offence; mistake on my part, Martyn Gombar is no better off for my error unfortunately.
A little short of treason is like being a little bit pregnant. It's obvious that you are an anti-Islamic bigot and are grasping at any straws you can find to justify said bigotry.
Hahah, now they are pretty groundless accusations, for someone who's just spent all that time arguing as to what constitutes treason. For the record I'm not a bigot, I'm quite liberal actually, but I won't put up with pricks like Ahmed dictating to this government what issues it may or may not discuss in it's houses or whom with. Especially when this despicable toad employs force, he is a disgrace to this country and should be ejected from his seat within our government.
Hahaha, that's not an answer, that's an ad hominem and a pretty fucking piss poor excuse for one at that. Besides, there's nothing wrong with my use of apostrophes. You can cast all the aspersions you like, you don't know anything about me, the fact that you even assume authority to judge me only reflects your arrogance, frankly.
You used "it's" as a possessive instead of as a contraction, moron. And try to get the facts straight before you attempt to propagandize next time, junior!
If all you can do is pick fault with punctuation and toss insults around it begs the question who should really be lecturing who on subjects of maturity. That said, aside from arguing the definition of treason under UK law, you haven't managed to counter a single point made in that video, so apparently my facts were straight.
Oh, and for the record, that was the correct use, re-read the sentence ace.
It sounds to me that Hitler has been reincarnated in the form of Lord Ahmed. Let us all rally to get riid of him before he helps the Muslims to take over this country. Although I admit there are some good muslims amongst these evil people who live under the cover of religion so they can get away with Murder.
yes it appears that JAIL along with freedom of speech "is alright but not at my expense" for NAZI Ahmed so it appears life is nearly as cheap (only 12wks) here, as in pakistan. but as always, lets not forget who the real "victim" is here, and so true to form the muslim lord is appealing against that, as he feels he is being made a "scapegoat" for what? you ask ignorance of the law?, gross and wilful neglect ? unlawful taking of a life? my opinion his new low level of shame
It appears that the UK has a new policy: Appeasement II. Lord Ahmed is now the de-facto leader of Parliament. He decides what can be discussed and debated.
Will this new policy be as successful as Appeasement I (the Chamberlin solution to halt Hitlers aggression)?
if they can t stand it and act in the stereotypical way they show the faults of THEIR ideology (lies and violence)
so NO TWISTING BLAMING SIDETRACKING from the real issue here, as there is NO moral highground for Islam to take, criticism of Islam is well overdue and required
Whether Geert Wilder was right or wrong with his film on Quran it is not the issue here. It's about freedom of speech in an once free country. The Parliament should have been able to see the film and listen to Geert Wilder then see the islamic response - with the complete quotations.
No scripture be it Islamic or Christian incites to violence, it is the people interpreting these scriptures in their own ways to control the masses who do that.
How can you be so sure that the Christian and Muslim scriptures contain NO verses of hatred but infact it is those who misinterpret their scripture that go on to commit violence?
Are you saying this because you have read the Bible and the Qur'an or are you saying it to appease the religionists?
The Institute Of Freedom Of Speech, the institute that guards Freedom of Speech issued a statement: (qoute)
'Freedom of Speech does not provide sanctuary to hate-mongers and envious deviants such Geert Wilders'. It added, 'The UK Goverment has all rights to stop Mr. Wilders enter into the UK to maintain Public Order.'
allmah, the pedophile worshiper. SHAME ON YOU to worship the word of a FILTHY man that FUCKED A 9 YEAR OLD CHILD, RAPED A CHILD! MURDERED 900 Jews, beheaded them, SICK PIG. You Muslims worship FILTH, SHAME ON YOU, SHAME ON YOU!
He claims for freedom of religion until muslims will become majority in UK, then the freedom will be ended, there is no other way, read quran to learn what agenda he stands for !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lord Ahmed should have got loads of letters and e-mails from BNP members last week who all protested against his stance. I suggested that if he wanted to see 10,000 muslims mobilised on the street he should buy a plane ticket to the Gaza strip,there's many more there. He hasn's answered back yet.
and if it really wants to demonstrate this it should also surely take action against Lord Ahmed, who abused his position as a peer, to threaten mass intimidation of the House in which he sits
The British people maybe ignorant,(at present) to the threat of Islam but they are not stupid
We ve had a exceptionally rough time of late because of the old social engineering from Tories/Labour gvments
Sedition. illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority and tending to cause the disruption of the government
ie. threatening to prevent an invited person, and lawful exhibition of a film and important debate of interest to some in the the house, and mobilising a 10000 strong mob to do so in the process
using islam's proven violent reputation as the threat.
if so GOOD we would just see even more of their violent ideology
this scumbag holds a position that i m damn sure the vast majority believe he
should never have had anyway
Treason?
Violation, betrayal of allegiance
IE an allegiance to bigoted muslim interests only over those of the overwhelming majority/betrayal of our countries inalienable right to the freedom of speech/ preventing the work of the 2nd house by the use of threat
Very well written. Make more spoken videos!
reeged 1 year ago
Hey, they even banned Michael Savage a DJ from America also.
pogueuk 2 years ago
Thats it im voting bnp. hopefully they wont be bullied like this its criminal!
vikingthors 2 years ago
The movie FITNA was made to misrepresent Islam by quoting half of Qur'anic verses out of context.
These verses of Qur'an were revealed at the time of war and every verse that enjoins the believers to fight is followed soon by the verse that enjoins peacemaking.
So the believer is asked to keep in mind for peace while he is fighting against oppression.
Geert Wilders cut off the peacemaking part of the verse and introduced loud music to make good part of the speech of scholar inaudible !
peace4universe 2 years ago
And I'm sure those well versed in the Qur'an would have been given the opportunity to explain the fallacies in Mr Wilder's logic to him, had he not been refused entry to the UK. I'm not defending Geert Wilder's position, I'm defending his freedom to hold and/or express an opinion, just or otherwise.
schmatt13 2 years ago
In fact wilders never goes in debate with true moslims., hes just hate the ones without jobs, etc
Killuminati911 2 years ago
pe
no the fitna did tell the truth abt islam and that's why is was banned by muslims if not then why not have a debat over the movie
hannahr77 2 years ago
Muslims are not supposed to listen abuse about islam and Allah unless they have enough knowledge to defend
Most of the muslims learn the faith just for the sake of practice , not to debate ;the debate is supposed to be undertaken by scholars and I will send you video responses of muslim scholars Insha-Allah
peace4universe 2 years ago
Swing and a miss....
schmatt13 2 years ago
If you want to be taken seriously, I would suggest that you not accuse the political opposition of treason.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Obstruction of the functions of a parliamentary house and threats of legal action against members are considered acts of contempt under UK law...
"Obstructing Members or officials in the discharge of their duty, threatening a Member with the possibility of legal proceedings for a Question asked in the House."
Research FTW!!
schmatt13 2 years ago
So, how exactly did someone threaten legal proceedings over a question or obstruct someone in their duties? Even if that was the case, is that really the same as treason? I don't think that it is.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Ahmed threatened legal proceedings against the peers who had organized the screenings, he also threatened to march 10,000 muslims into London to prevent Mr Wilders, an elected european parliamentarian from entering the House of Lords, this would be an obstruction.
schmatt13 2 years ago
It's not some UKIP peer's duty to have a movie screening party on the premises, crackpot. And even if Lord Ahmed was held in contempt, that's a far cry from treason. You pants-pissing Islamophobes are just a bunch of drama queens.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Islamaphobe.... oh dear, someone else bought into a propaganda buzz word... wondered how long it would be before that one came up.
The term assumes that no good person could possibly have valid concerns about the political agendas of any minority group. Let's use blanket insults like 'racist' or 'nazi' to obscure the point.
There is nothing irrational in fearing the growing influence of theocratic pressure groups or the barbaric moral standards that their teachings advocate.
schmatt13 2 years ago
I'll take that as an admission of defeat on the claim of treason.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Not exactly, it's you who lowered the argument to cat-calling. Duties are regardless, the rule of obstruction extends to all functions of the house, including the invitation of foreign politicians to discuss political issues. He's not exactly inviting his friends around to watch a movie, he raising questions and political debate in the light of Mr Wilders prosecution. A right reserved by the House of Lords for several hundred years, Ahmed is in breach of those freedoms of the house.
schmatt13 2 years ago
Again, hardly treason.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Again, up to a court to decide on that, should he be prosecuted. He can't be right now, he's serving time for drink driving offences.
schmatt13 2 years ago
You were the one who made the accusations of treason and came up a little short. Furthermore, Lord Ahmed was released from jail two weeks ago on appeal of a charge of dangerous driving stemming from sending text messages, not drunk driving.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Oddly enough I used the phrase, 'an act little short of treason' in the video, nonetheless, his actions are acts of contempt against the ruling government of this country. Thank you for pointing out the driving offence; mistake on my part, Martyn Gombar is no better off for my error unfortunately.
schmatt13 2 years ago
A little short of treason is like being a little bit pregnant. It's obvious that you are an anti-Islamic bigot and are grasping at any straws you can find to justify said bigotry.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Hahah, now they are pretty groundless accusations, for someone who's just spent all that time arguing as to what constitutes treason. For the record I'm not a bigot, I'm quite liberal actually, but I won't put up with pricks like Ahmed dictating to this government what issues it may or may not discuss in it's houses or whom with. Especially when this despicable toad employs force, he is a disgrace to this country and should be ejected from his seat within our government.
schmatt13 2 years ago
Yes, a real "liberal." Get back to me when you figure out how to use an apostrophe.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Hahaha, that's not an answer, that's an ad hominem and a pretty fucking piss poor excuse for one at that. Besides, there's nothing wrong with my use of apostrophes. You can cast all the aspersions you like, you don't know anything about me, the fact that you even assume authority to judge me only reflects your arrogance, frankly.
schmatt13 2 years ago
You used "it's" as a possessive instead of as a contraction, moron. And try to get the facts straight before you attempt to propagandize next time, junior!
condellwatch 2 years ago
If all you can do is pick fault with punctuation and toss insults around it begs the question who should really be lecturing who on subjects of maturity. That said, aside from arguing the definition of treason under UK law, you haven't managed to counter a single point made in that video, so apparently my facts were straight.
Oh, and for the record, that was the correct use, re-read the sentence ace.
schmatt13 2 years ago
Like I would actually watch a propaganda video like that? Get real.
condellwatch 2 years ago
@condellwatch Pathetic.
reeged 1 year ago
It sounds to me that Hitler has been reincarnated in the form of Lord Ahmed. Let us all rally to get riid of him before he helps the Muslims to take over this country. Although I admit there are some good muslims amongst these evil people who live under the cover of religion so they can get away with Murder.
fulfilled123 3 years ago
secula4eva 3 years ago
Thank you for posting this outstanding video.
It appears that the UK has a new policy: Appeasement II. Lord Ahmed is now the de-facto leader of Parliament. He decides what can be discussed and debated.
Will this new policy be as successful as Appeasement I (the Chamberlin solution to halt Hitlers aggression)?
RonaldDumbsfeld 3 years ago 3
OFFENCE
GET USED TO IT
come to the DEBATE Islam
and NOT with YOUR insane conditions
Islam better get used to ALL free speech
it needs to be faced with it consistently
if they can t stand it and act in the stereotypical way they show the faults of THEIR ideology (lies and violence)
so NO TWISTING BLAMING SIDETRACKING from the real issue here, as there is NO moral highground for Islam to take, criticism of Islam is well overdue and required
face the PRE-scriptive incitment in own book
secula4eva 3 years ago
Whether Geert Wilder was right or wrong with his film on Quran it is not the issue here. It's about freedom of speech in an once free country. The Parliament should have been able to see the film and listen to Geert Wilder then see the islamic response - with the complete quotations.
No scripture be it Islamic or Christian incites to violence, it is the people interpreting these scriptures in their own ways to control the masses who do that.
johnstrange2008 3 years ago
How can you be so sure that the Christian and Muslim scriptures contain NO verses of hatred but infact it is those who misinterpret their scripture that go on to commit violence?
Are you saying this because you have read the Bible and the Qur'an or are you saying it to appease the religionists?
J4m3z1 3 years ago
Parliament wasn't going to see it. One peer had a viewing party.
condellwatch 2 years ago
Spoken like a true moslem lol.
" Freedom of Speech does not provide sanctuary to hate-mongers and envious deviants such as Geert Wilders "
Geert should be given some kind of award for is honesty.
What the fuck would you know about FREE SPEECH, try walking in a ilzlamic state carrying a banner death to all moslems and see what happens to you.
Talking about hate-mongers and envious deviants, isn't it funny that not all moslems are TERRORISTS but all TERRORISTS are moslems.
Proud to be BNP
AbertaweBNP 3 years ago 3
The Institute Of Freedom Of Speech, the institute that guards Freedom of Speech issued a statement: (qoute)
'Freedom of Speech does not provide sanctuary to hate-mongers and envious deviants such Geert Wilders'. It added, 'The UK Goverment has all rights to stop Mr. Wilders enter into the UK to maintain Public Order.'
allamah1 3 years ago
allmah, the pedophile worshiper. SHAME ON YOU to worship the word of a FILTHY man that FUCKED A 9 YEAR OLD CHILD, RAPED A CHILD! MURDERED 900 Jews, beheaded them, SICK PIG. You Muslims worship FILTH, SHAME ON YOU, SHAME ON YOU!
ISLAMisSICKo 3 years ago 3
Muhammed was a MASS MURDER, the qur'an is a book full of VIOLENCE and incitement to MURDER!
ISLAMisSICKo 3 years ago 2
Great vid fella.
Enoch Powell talked about what is currently happening in Britain, I would say over the next 10 years there will be a massive price to pay.
God bless Gert Wilders a man who will gladly speak the TRUTH, if you are a liebour supporter, you won't know what the TRUTH is.
Proud to be BNP
AbertaweBNP 3 years ago
BNP Says:
We hate Wilders.
Now where do we go from here?
allamah1 3 years ago
BNP was bought yesterday by mr. singh
allamah1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LORD AHMED
This dirty guy follows a fascist agenda.
He claims for freedom of religion until muslims will become majority in UK, then the freedom will be ended, there is no other way, read quran to learn what agenda he stands for !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
what a sham for UK !!!
OgmiosTube 3 years ago
All our institutions have been infiltrated, we cannot trust them until they are whitewashed, re-constructed and reformed.
countesscristo 3 years ago
Lord Ahmed should have got loads of letters and e-mails from BNP members last week who all protested against his stance. I suggested that if he wanted to see 10,000 muslims mobilised on the street he should buy a plane ticket to the Gaza strip,there's many more there. He hasn's answered back yet.
countesscristo 3 years ago
So IF the lords is fighting back?,
and if it really wants to demonstrate this it should also surely take action against Lord Ahmed, who abused his position as a peer, to threaten mass intimidation of the House in which he sits
The British people maybe ignorant,(at present) to the threat of Islam but they are not stupid
We ve had a exceptionally rough time of late because of the old social engineering from Tories/Labour gvments
but people are waking up
and hey
hard times do galvanise
secula4eva 3 years ago
I am so sick of our so-called "leaders" cowtowing, groveling and licking the butts of Moslems!
skeetereze 3 years ago
islam is evil
the truth hurts
bjbjbjbjbj 3 years ago
Sweet Islam gives u a kiss!
allamah1 3 years ago
allahahaha1
....kiss of death,maybe
islam is evil
bjbjbjbjbj 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sweet Islam loves you!
allamah1 3 years ago
islam is evil
god hates muslims
she says ..
see the film 'fitna'
bjbjbjbjbj 3 years ago 3
Nobody licks anyone's butt.
allamah1 3 years ago
GO GEERT!!! Keep on speaking the TRUTH!!!
skeetereze 3 years ago
Go Geert if so thats GREAT news
maybe "those" inthe house whose only attempt at an intellectual leap is BACKwards to the 7th century will go back to lording over chip shops
instead of using any info as an opportunity t subvert .
THREATENING to try and silence the exposing of such hate..
yes FITNA it has much "hate speech"
that belongs to THOSE WHO FOLLOW Muhammed ALONE and those that refuse to reform, his LIES and that books HATEFUL fascism
it is
the most retrograde force in the world
secula4eva 3 years ago
Say I believe in Allah and His Messenger
allamah1 3 years ago
Intellectual Reasoning leaps by holding tight to the Holy Qur'an. Perhaps, this might be the reason why Lod Ahmed won the fight. Have a good night.
allamah1 3 years ago
I just read that Wilders has been re-invited to speak and screen his film in the Lords later this month. Hope this is true.
WenhamLongington 3 years ago
Who is this "Lord" Ahmed anyway? Who gave him the power to do what he did?
It is time to get rid of the "House of Lords" altogether as well as Emir Charles and the rest of this feudal baggage&celebrity scum.
A constitution with a "first amendment" like in the US block all those who scream for censorship and guarantee Free Speech.
I'd call it Lex John Stuart Mill.
Melvin6566842 3 years ago 6
could this even be
Sedition. illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority and tending to cause the disruption of the government
ie. threatening to prevent an invited person, and lawful exhibition of a film and important debate of interest to some in the the house, and mobilising a 10000 strong mob to do so in the process
using islam's proven violent reputation as the threat.
if so GOOD we would just see even more of their violent ideology
exactly like in the film
secula4eva 3 years ago 6
send this everywhere like a rash
there IS a LOT of mileage in this
this simply CANNOT stand
this scumbag holds a position that i m damn sure the vast majority believe he
should never have had anyway
Treason?
Violation, betrayal of allegiance
IE an allegiance to bigoted muslim interests only over those of the overwhelming majority/betrayal of our countries inalienable right to the freedom of speech/ preventing the work of the 2nd house by the use of threat
lock this scumbag up !
secula4eva 3 years ago 5