感謝老師, 主要是我以前彈過r9, 覺得他的tone比我彈過一般standard/classic好不少, 所以才會產生興趣, 我也是要拿來彈的, 所以tone好就好, 如果能省錢,tone又一樣好, 當然是pr-ehistoric 囉~~多謝老師
Fz0115 3 weeks ago
@Fz0115
You are welcome. Hope you can find the TONE!!
AmazeTone 3 weeks ago
請教門田老師, 您有比較過pre-historic 與93年後r9系列在音色,木料或重量上的差異嗎?
小弟有考慮買一隻r9, 但是如果pre history跟r9差異不大, 也有考慮prehistoric! 感謝老師!!
我以前有試過些R9了(雖然沒試過最近的CTS Pots和Bumble Bee Caps的版本)
都還不錯啊，不過我不是collector，而是player，所以對收藏價值比較沒興趣
如果我這一把的tone 跟R9差異很大的話我早就有買R9啊，哈哈
不過你知道一樣的型號也每把會有不同的tone吧？
如果你要買R9，最好用你自己的而朵來比看看喔
Great video. I JUST sold my '89 Pre-Historic reissue this past week. My absolute favorite guitar in my "collection". IMHO, they are grossly underrated. Yours sounds incredible.
klextacy 3 weeks ago
@klextacy
Thanks for your response! Yeah, it sounds really great although Pre-Historic reissue is underrated.
感謝老師, 主要是我以前彈過r9, 覺得他的tone比我彈過一般standard/classic好不少, 所以才會產生興趣, 我也是要拿來彈的, 所以tone好就好, 如果能省錢,tone又一樣好, 當然是pr-ehistoric 囉~~多謝老師
Fz0115 3 weeks ago
@Fz0115
You are welcome. Hope you can find the TONE!!
AmazeTone 3 weeks ago
請教門田老師, 您有比較過pre-historic 與93年後r9系列在音色,木料或重量上的差異嗎?
小弟有考慮買一隻r9, 但是如果pre history跟r9差異不大, 也有考慮prehistoric! 感謝老師!!
Fz0115 3 weeks ago
@Fz0115
我以前有試過些R9了(雖然沒試過最近的CTS Pots和Bumble Bee Caps的版本)
都還不錯啊，不過我不是collector，而是player，所以對收藏價值比較沒興趣
如果我這一把的tone 跟R9差異很大的話我早就有買R9啊，哈哈
不過你知道一樣的型號也每把會有不同的tone吧？
如果你要買R9，最好用你自己的而朵來比看看喔
AmazeTone 3 weeks ago
Great video. I JUST sold my '89 Pre-Historic reissue this past week. My absolute favorite guitar in my "collection". IMHO, they are grossly underrated. Yours sounds incredible.
klextacy 3 weeks ago
@klextacy
Thanks for your response! Yeah, it sounds really great although Pre-Historic reissue is underrated.
AmazeTone 3 weeks ago