@newjerseydev, seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you beat-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain.
@newjerseydev seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you jack-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain. Libturd.
@newjerseydev seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you beat-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain.
@newjerseydev seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you beat-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain.
@shredder1965 Actually u are wrong. Coulter has done this before. She, the gook twinkie Malkin have posted names and addresses of people htey disagree with on their website. and liberals? u use that abusively. Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin referred to their political thought as liberal. Neo ocnservatives were once liberals as well. they disagreed with the direction liberals were going in and latchd onto the right for political reasons. Liberal meangin progressive is actually a positive term
Lydia Cornell is HILARIOUS! Did you see her in the new Kelsey Grammer-Bill Zucker Comedy Hour on Kelsey Live, or maybe it's Vimeo. Very funneeeee! I also loved her in Curb Your Enthusiasm. I want to see Lydia in her own show...
Thanks to FDR, starting in 1936, the U.S. experienced the biggest GDP growth ever measured, and thanks to his investing in the nation's infrastructure and its people, the longest period of economic growth ever, which lasted decades, and also the creation of the largest middle class in the history of the planet. You obviously have a diet of nothing but Fox Noise and Limbaugh because your sense of perspective is completely warped.
Lydia is on youtube and you Right Wing losers are not. Maybe she didn't want to work in Hollywood.
All you Republicans defending Ann Adams Apple Coulter need to get to worry about getting a job now that Bush fucked your beloved country's economy up. Your right wing politics were in full effect for that eight years and it only sank the USA. Losers.
I call bullshit on that. Lydia Cornell would work in Hollywood again in a minute and you know it. Funny, looks like Obama's honeymoon is over and now he's getting the heat turned up.
And you're the loser asswipe. So big and brave hiding behind your screen.
Ban Coulter-geist & Fox (aka Faux) News are the MAIN reasons RepubliC*NTS have LOST 55 US Senate & House seats over the last 2 elections. She's an ugly, bulimic, drag queen bimbo, who deserves to be put out of her misery. She's a true PIG.....with or without lipstick! ~Scarah Failin
I deleted your comments because they were obscene. This is a comedy video that kids can watch. Anyone who defends Coulter needs to have their head examined. She should be put in jail for treason.
@ImDavidGurney So what's stopping you, knuckledragger? Typical useless TeaParty pod person: no ideas, prone to inaction and a coward to boot. If it weren't for running your mouths spewing nonsense, you lot would be totally speechless.
I heard Lydia Cornell had death threats from Ann Coulter fans after Ann Coulter posted her private home number on her website in retaliation for a humorous article Lydia wrote about her. Ann Coulter is a hate monger, and should never be allowed to use hate-speak on the airwaves again. Lydia is a class-act and I imagine she dropped the idea of a book on Coulter because she didn't want anymore threats and harrassment. Coulter is nuts.
You heard wrong. This woman sent a professional letter to Ann Coulter portraying herself as a journalist with "readers" and included a presumed business address and phone number. Ann Coulter FAIRLY posted the e-mail sent to her in its full context. Lydia then claimed she "accidentally" put her home number on there in lieu of her business one. It was her own blunder. As if Ann Coulter really had time to search out every idiotic liberal's private information for her readers to harrass.
snorp73: YOU heard wrong and you are wrong. What Coulter did was despicable. According to MSNBC, Editor & Publisher, "she was contacted and asked to remove the phone number several times but never budged. Once she knew it was private information, she should have taken it down, but she was busy calling for Supreme Court Justice Stevens to "be poisoned" because he was pro-life. Coulter should be in jail for inciting hatred against Americans by using death-wishes and extermination-speak." (quote
Ann Coulter is the most un-Christian example of a self-seeking publicity hound. She'll say anything to get attention. Cornell wrote this in an article: "The lowest was when she made fun of John Edwards' loss of his son. Nothing defines a person more than the death of a child, and Coulter can never know the depth of compassion it takes to become a true human being and citizen of the world."
1.) She didn't make fun of his son's death - tell Lydia to pull her head of out her mall. She made fun of Edwardss constant need to bring it up during the campaign!
Moreover; you know darn well I answered your last comment very well loaded with facts. The fact you have to delete it I think is all we need to know of just how confident you are in your position.
@snorp73 Actually u are wrong. Coulter has done this before. She, the gook twinkie Malkin have posted names and addresses of people htey disagree with on their website. and liberals? u use that abusively. Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin referred to their political thought as liberal. Neo ocnservatives were once liberals as well. they disagreed with the direction liberals were going in and latchd onto the right for political reasons. Liberal meangin progressive is actually a positive term
@newjerseydev Coulter nor Malkin posted private information out of spite because someone was a liberal. Lydia C. acted like she was a writer with an audience, then turned around and tried to use Coulter to get some attention. Coulter beat her to the punch and spent one tenth of the energy Lydia spent on her.
Malkin did this a couple months ago following an appearance on Hannity to show the HATE MAIL received from people. If they cannot take the heat, keep them out of the kitchen.
@snorp73@snorp73 sorry snorp but u are incorrect. malkin posted the rivate contact details of a Univeristy of california peace orgs website leaders after he criticised her. wiki malkin and ull see it firsthand. silly hateful woman. the fact that u havent heard this is one thing-u watch FoX, but the fact that u deny shows that you dont know whats going on and are ignorant. read a little more than one website before spouting lies
Ha, I love how you characterize it as simple criticism. I know Malkin and have been reading her forever. She posts all details on e-mails when they sound psychotic. This, you see, goes beyond what you call standard criticism. I have seen her do it, and it's always good to point out who these people are to give Americans a choice on whether or not to do business with people like that. You liberals always try to pick a fight, but when conservatives win, you start crying.
@snorp73 First off Snorpette I am not a liberal.Im a former Marine living in europe.But the founding fathers considered themselves liberals.many neo conservatives are former liberals coming from the left..and ur words are foolish. Malkin is a threat. u htink its right to post peoples personal addresses on public websites when u disagree with their actions?this kid was a peace activist and didnt deserve to have his details posted.what happened if someone opened fire on his home?malkin is immoral
Well depending on what liberal meant in those days. Liberal describes Christianity back then as well when it is compared to Islam and Judaism.
But the founding fathers WERE NOT Obama or Pelosi liberals. I am sorry, but that is so laughable. Can you imagine what the constitutiton would have read like if it were.
I think Malkin and Coulter both had to publish emails received from haters on the left in their full context so their readers know they are factual.
@newjerseydev Once again, if liberals so not want to be held accountable of responsible for their words, they shouldn't open their mouths to begin with.
Stop whining and tell them to take a little personal responsibility.
@snorp73 I am sure u arent a bad person just misinformed like the majority of god fearing americans. i wont continue this argument. but ur making an error malkin didnt receive an email. wiki Malkin and read about it yourself,. she heard about a kid on campus standing up for peace and she horrifically took his little local school advertsiemnt and placed it onher internaitonal website so that people from all over could get his mobile number. he got death threats and was in police protection,nice
@snorp73 sorry snorp but u are incorrect. malkin posted the rivate contact details of a Univeristy of california peace orgs website leaders after he criticised her. wiki malkin and ull see it firsthand. silly hateful woman. the fact that u havent heard this is one thing-u watch FoX, but the fact that u deny shows that you dont know whats going on and are ignorant. read a little more than one website before spouting lies
Scroll down to Catdogs explaination for deleting some of your comments. not in this thread ,but previously. 2+2 still=4. Troops home? I believe thats a "NO" for McCain. 99.9% The outcome for us is bankruptcy. Bush cut the feds contribution to utility assistance for the elderly. No fans this year my paper here says. How sad,to an American, but not to your kind. There will be no good outcome. Bush senior was right when he said it would be a "Quagmire" Too bad his boy was an idiot.Shouldda listened
First no comment of mine was deleted for the use of obscenity. I'm not sure who he/she was referring to, but it wasn't me. Simply talking to liberals and using facts is way to get them to scream. Next - "troops home" is the stupid question CBS News uses to tell us what Americans think of the war. I'm telling you that if 100% of Americans did not say "yes" to that question. Majority of Americans want them home, BUT do not think Iraq should be left in the condition it's in.
And what condition do you want America left in? If you haven't noticed the economy is beginning to tank. I've never met a neo-con that can count, guess I never will. We can't afford to stay in Iraq. Maybe you like Bushs budget deficent, but I'm a little smarter than that.Thanks to all the lies Bush put out America's on a downward spiral.Screw Iraq, the damage is done.Your clueless like the few people that still believe Bush. Just watch the economy. Try arguing with that
That's not an answer. It's a generalization. There isn't anything to argue. First and foremost, tax revenue should be spent on national security - not welfare, not lazy people's healthcare and certainly not Global Warming studies. Your ideology is so common that if it were taken seriously, we'd all be speaking German by now. So what, now I suppose you're going to pretend you "support" 300,000 American deaths, capring bombing entire German cities, and defeating evil?
Germany declared war on the U.S. so as usual your supposition is ridiculous. Well its clear your not a Christian. Every man for himself and greedy little you first. lol Boy would this country suck if your kind was in charge! Oh wait,they are and things suck. I'm not going to bother your empty neo-con mind with facts, you haven't been able to respond to anything, you just ignore the uncomfortable.So typical. You should try reading, a little history would be a start so you dont sound so foolish.
That's because you have no facts. What's "greedy" to you is what happens to make America great. People like you need people like Obama to strip the pockets of hard-working ambitious folks to line yours. Wealth re-distribution is a classic sign of communism, it's what they do best and it's what you celebrate. An enemy attacked us in WW2 and one attacked us in 2001. What country was it that attacked us in 2001? None did, it's not ending in Iraq so get used to it.
Sorry people like you are on the way out. Wealth redistribution? Dont make me laugh. What do you think is happening now? But you are right about one thing. No country attacked us. Ben ladin did. And Bush can't even find him. So we're in Iraq why? Because of nothing but lies. The stupidity you call your "ideology" will end when the truth comes out. Oh,sorry I make too much to qualify for any programs. I'm just not as self-centered as you,
Wait. Wealth distribution has nothing to do with war. Under Bush, the only economic thing done through legislation are the tax cuts he's proposed. Your arguments prior seem to have led us to believe that you support taxing the rich in order to pay for everyone else. So I assume you don't support that now, right? And this nonsense about Osama is why you will never be able to fill the gap in your mind. Osama is a piece, what about the thousands killed in attacks for 20+ years before 2001?
What about the men who planned the JFK plot? How about the Fort Dixx plot? The USS Cole. The 4 attacks during Clinton's administration? The truth is you don't support ANY measure to stop them. No profiling at airports, no Patriot Act, no Guantanamo, no war, no NSA listening to cell calls of terrorists. Your "catch Osama" bull is revealed when the facts stack up against you that ANYTHING Bush could do to find him or stop him - you would be against. Which part of his policy do you support?
I LOVE it when Neos in a corner start this line Oh yea, I'm want America to fall, I want my kids to die, I want to welcome the terrorist in with open arms so they can shoot me. My God do you realize how silly your position is. I don't agree with Bush so I want America destroyed?!Bush is an ineffective fool, the best thing our enemies could hope for. I support his wanting to give SeaPort security to some Arabs, remember? LOL. I'm sure you do.
Okay, so here we go again. "Bush is an ineffective fool" (who just happened to keep my ass safe for eight years). You still aren't answering the question. Let's say Bush's only mission was to "catch just Osama" (liberals' belief of "fixing it all"). Would you support the NSA listening to calls to capture him? If he were held at Guantanamo and used for questioning to lead us to his next-in-line folk (oh wait, we got those), would you support water-boarding then? WHAT WILL YOU SUPPORT?
Safe from what? You neos are such Cowards it's disgusting. 543 billon dollars and nothing to show for it. I've taken FEMA's course on NBC incident response planning, resource allocation and triage. I understand the realities and you do not. That money could have vastly improved Americas ability to cope with anything they threw at us. Afganistan had to happen, Iraq is all a filthy lie. I support the Constitution and I will bear arms to defend it against all enemies foreign or domestic.
Safe from attacks! If it were not for the Patriot Act or the NSA or catching the terrorists held at Gitmo now, JFK would have gone though, the Brookly Bridge would have been destroyed, etc. But the fact is you don't support what protected us. You can take all the courses you want, but without the policies in place, none of it is effective! You still cannot prove Iraq is a lie, and once it is safe to leave and we have another strong ally there, even the media won't be able to harp anymore.
Would you support pro-filing at airports if Bush got a memo that said "bin Laden determined to visit ground zero in the next three months!" Would you support measures enforced by the Patriot Act to catch him? Would you support bombing areas of Afghanistan to guarantee his death? You liberals can't just say "get Osama!" anymore, you have to make your case believable by supporting JUST ONE measure effective in doing so. So tell me, which one do you support?
By the way your rant from you "empty liberal mind" is so "typical." You think that was anything more original than what we've heard out of Rosie O'Donnell?
And it seems I've already won. Yet another brilliant "join something to support something" argument. Did you join your local fire department yet? Volunteering for local classrooms to assist teachers? Volunteer for local police work? I'm sure - otherwise you don't really support them. Tell me, why did you save the pinnacle of your brilliance for this portion of the discussion?
Funny you would ask, I'm an EMT and I volunteer at an E.R. to keep my continuing education requirements up to date as well as helping. I also teach Red Cross CPR classes.Did you know that rescue breaths will be eliminated when the next update is released? Compressions only in the future. Some of us act on our beliefs. Won? lol Your a prize all right.
But what about the rest of it? Since I assume you support teachers, I assume you volunteer to help in classrooms? You join everything you support? Winning comes easy when facts and logic are your side. Don't feel too bad.
I fail to see what your winning. And what do you help support? Nothing? Just a talker I'm sure Well at least your forced to concede the moral high ground since you do nothing to help Americans.
Go ahead and look up morals so you don't embarass yourself yet again. Feel bad? Hardly. Chatting with you makes me feel pretty good about things. Your a talker and I'm a doer. Again what do you do to justify being in our country? Try to answer if possible
Assuming you knew what I contributed to or how I paid back (not that being in the 33% tax bracket isn't enough), I've always found it odd that the best people of the world were the ones who were great because people recognized it, not because they have to run around reminding everyone all the time. That isn't to say that liberals have never embellished facts to put a personal touch on a debate of ideas. The facts are on my side - logically, you cannot join everything you support.
I was pondering this post and I glanced at your page...WTF!? In a previous life you were in charge of the "Jews for Hitler" party right? Look I'm sorry if what I do makes you feel inadequate,don't ask and I won't bring it up. As for logic I think it saw you coming and ran like hell. You are one deeply self conflicted person. No wonder you defend your position regardless of the facts. What else do you have? Well thanks for keeping the punchline for last.. you are a HOOT.
Can you imagine Mother Teresa running around as the diva of goodwill? If I was inadequate or felt that way, the way I spoke would have exuded that. But the fact YOU had to say it cancels out your claim all once. You can't deny that my theory factually refuted every stupid liberal "you must join something to support something" argument against the war. So when you answer this, it's probably best to remind us again how inadequate you make me feel rather than attempting to answer the point. ;-)
BTW, not only did you purposely avoid telling refuting the point about liberals brilliant 3rd grade level "join something to support something argument" I see you have also avoided telling me which policy you would support in capturing Osama bin Laden. Quick patting yourself on the back long enough to type an actual response! :-)
All the troops to Afganistan into Pakistan if needed. Is that simple enough? Join something to support something is an American tradition. Pop was VFW, Ma was a prayer circle leader. Where the hell did you grow up, Orphanage? I'm starting to feel sorry for you.
No...we all have family military members, we all have contributed through work and money...but because you do not actively join any particular cause does not change the idea of having it. So great, the troops are in Afghanistan. Now what? When we capture him, can we kill him? Can we take him to Gitmo and waterboard him? Are we allowed to intercept his phone calls and can we profile him at the airport if he walks in clean-shaven and wearing a Hawaiian shirt? What can we do that's effective?
No, really, be as concise as you can and eliminate the B.S. about anybody who disagrees is a terrorist. Thats just talking points from Rush. And I'll do the same.
I was concise and I didn't say anyone was a terrorist. But liberals sure say it in the case of Dick Cheney or George Bush...ahem. I spelled it out and used many words to explain it. I know you can read, we've been chatting for days now.
No Bush is a traitor to the constitution, from an American perspective.Think of it as a position statement. No purpose except to explain what you think Bush has accomplished. I'll have a rebuttal and you can re-rebuttal and then see where we stand. But I'm off duty at 5 a.m.so research fast.
I sleep. Bush has accomplished the beginning of a strong foothold in the Middle East. He was the only leader (aside from reagan) in the last 20 years who stood up to terrorists and faced it head-on. If Carter would not given them the first strong foothold in 1979, this wouldn't be happening. If liberals really believe that Obama or Clinton will go in an rip troops out of Iraq, they are really fooling themselves. It's almost as funny as them supporting gay marriage or true "equality."
Lets not debate the past,no point The now is whats important, and as important is Iraqi attitudes towards the U.S. The U.N. compilied several opinion polls US,UK,independent and heres a short list. The invasion-49% right, 50% wrong. Confidence in US forces-20%good, 79% bad.When should US withdraw-38%-now, 35% when iraq is secure. A total of 15% say Occupation is good/somewhat 85% say bad/somewhat The foothold dosen't exist,according to Iraqs.Maybe at the point of a M4. So this is an Occupation
Right, just as effective as CBS calling up 1,000 alleged voters. If you asked 1,000 Germans during WW2 after watching two towns over be destroyed by one bombing in our pursuit of Hitler, what do you think they would have said? The material reports of the generals, troops, and families of troops along with the fact that violence is massively down, we are winning, and civility is being restored directly contradicts the "polls". We've been hearing "danger danger" all along the way. No Difference
Sigh..This is a compilation of many different polls. A rebuttal should contain facts in opposition not "what ifs" about WW2.Hell the poll was trending upwards I figured you'd pick up on that, if you weren't so dismissive of things you don't agree with. The troops aren't Iraqis and their families are over here so they don't know do they?.Oh well I prefer facts and you prefer opinions. So much for intelligent debate.
These aren't facts...these are OPINION POLLS. And I know many military wives and family members that fully support the cause. Whatever you say, don't take away the pride of everything they have accomplished thus far. Polls contain people who also know it's possible to get the wrong answer, who has the media and celebrities telling them how evil Bush is and how he "lied" to us. Intelligent debate requires that you dig deeper and that's why I used WW2 as example.
So, let's ask this "poll question." Obviously 100% of Americans want the troops home. But when should they come home? How would you answer that poll question? And why would you answer it they you would?
You do realize that reagan sold arms to Iran AFTER the Iran hostage crisis That's trading with the enemy .So please ENLIGHTEN me,WHAT DID REAGAN DO TO "STAND UP TO TERRORISTS?
do you remember libya in 1986? The United States of America sent several F111-F/B's and dropped several bombs on qadaffi's tents targeting his ass for his government's role in the downing of American chartered passenger liners. qadaffi got the point that we could scratch his ass from the face of the earth!
Not only that, at the very same time Reagan was selling arms to Iran, he was selling WMD to Iraq, and those two countries were at war with one another. That sent such a wonderful message to the Middle East with the U.S. arming both sides in a conflict so they could kill each other.
Really? 5 days ago you were asking catdog why he deleted questions "or did it get a little to hot for you" I know this will be hard for you, but don't lie.
Don't exaggerate. He didn't imply to me that I was obscene. He must have been referring to someone else, I'm not an obscene person nor do I have to be to be effective in dealing with the common liberal.
Why do Neo cons make amusing little comments that really have no bearing on anything rational? Are you bitter because only 25%(CBS poll) of Americans still believe the lies? You should read Catdogs rebuttal.But for me Ann is a name caller and a soul-less harpy. No wonder you admire her. LOL
Okay...I responded to a stupid post of yours talking about how Ann Coulter fans are "hate mongers." Now I know that in a liberal's world, this is "originality" in the battleground of youtube comments. My comment simply was living up to the integrity of yours. Moving along - CBS News just published an article written by the Nation for God Sake. Misleading questions like "do you want the troops home?" (of course 100% would say yes) but for some reason they always disregard Iraq's outcome.
The only reason that Obama cannot be tried for treason is that he's not a USA citizen.
ImDavidGurney 11 months ago
@ImDavidGurney You're out of your mind.
somewhatlongdong 3 months ago
Comment removed
AceNucci 1 year ago
I love Lydia.
She still rocks.
Her opinion of Ann is the same as mine.
Thanks for posting this.
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@newjerseydev, seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you beat-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain.
shredder1965 1 year ago
Holy shit, she's still fine as hell. Balls deep in her blonde liberal butthole for hours.......
shredder1965 1 year ago
@shredder1965 What a lot of class u show. typical braindead hillbilly
newjerseydev 1 year ago
@newjerseydev Stop watching your mother taking a showing and then running back to the basement to finish yourself off. Libturd.
shredder1965 1 year ago
@shredder1965 im not even a liberal. that a label, as is commy, nigger, trailer trash etc. ur a brainwashed bitch
newjerseydev 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@newjerseydev seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you jack-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain. Libturd.
shredder1965 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@newjerseydev seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you beat-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain.
shredder1965 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@newjerseydev seriously, stop chewing the shit stains out of your mother's soiled panties while you beat-off. I think that the fecal enzymes have affected your tiny brain.
shredder1965 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shredder1965 Actually u are wrong. Coulter has done this before. She, the gook twinkie Malkin have posted names and addresses of people htey disagree with on their website. and liberals? u use that abusively. Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin referred to their political thought as liberal. Neo ocnservatives were once liberals as well. they disagreed with the direction liberals were going in and latchd onto the right for political reasons. Liberal meangin progressive is actually a positive term
newjerseydev 1 year ago
Wow! I liked this twit until she opened her mouth! You bitches just hate Ann because she makes you feel like baby killing whores!
AnimalBlackmatism 1 year ago
@AnimalBlackmatism Ann Coulter is a hypocrit and how the fuck could she have an abortion? whod fuck her in the first place!!!!
newjerseydev 1 year ago
@newjerseydev the same mf'ers who would f*ck janeane garofalo
AnimalBlackmatism 2 months ago
Lydia Cornell is HILARIOUS! Did you see her in the new Kelsey Grammer-Bill Zucker Comedy Hour on Kelsey Live, or maybe it's Vimeo. Very funneeeee! I also loved her in Curb Your Enthusiasm. I want to see Lydia in her own show...
maxmixtable 1 year ago
Thanks to FDR, starting in 1936, the U.S. experienced the biggest GDP growth ever measured, and thanks to his investing in the nation's infrastructure and its people, the longest period of economic growth ever, which lasted decades, and also the creation of the largest middle class in the history of the planet. You obviously have a diet of nothing but Fox Noise and Limbaugh because your sense of perspective is completely warped.
vieetverite 2 years ago 2
Lydia is tops.If there were only more Christians like her.
Peace.
Peacetoyouandyours 2 years ago 2
Lydia is on youtube and you Right Wing losers are not. Maybe she didn't want to work in Hollywood.
All you Republicans defending Ann Adams Apple Coulter need to get to worry about getting a job now that Bush fucked your beloved country's economy up. Your right wing politics were in full effect for that eight years and it only sank the USA. Losers.
icandoitbetter 2 years ago
I call bullshit on that. Lydia Cornell would work in Hollywood again in a minute and you know it. Funny, looks like Obama's honeymoon is over and now he's getting the heat turned up.
And you're the loser asswipe. So big and brave hiding behind your screen.
Dietpepsivanilla 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ban Coulter-geist & Fox (aka Faux) News are the MAIN reasons RepubliC*NTS have LOST 55 US Senate & House seats over the last 2 elections. She's an ugly, bulimic, drag queen bimbo, who deserves to be put out of her misery. She's a true PIG.....with or without lipstick! ~Scarah Failin
mavrek47 3 years ago
I love Lydia!
She still ROCKS!!
George Vreeland Hill
GeorgeVreelandHill 3 years ago 2
Hi!
I remember you from the Yahoo message boards. Great to see you're still around.
sapphiresunburn 3 years ago
just another dumb blonde proving the arrogant stupidity and ignorance of the liberal left.
suntzu1985 3 years ago
agreed
MightySaturn5 2 years ago
I deleted your comments because they were obscene. This is a comedy video that kids can watch. Anyone who defends Coulter needs to have their head examined. She should be put in jail for treason.
11Catdog 3 years ago
@11Catdog Love it. She should be burned like the witch she is. Nice to see someone with sense
newjerseydev 1 year ago
@11Catdog Obama should be swinging from a tree for revealing Britain's nuclear codes to Russia.
ImDavidGurney 11 months ago
@ImDavidGurney So what's stopping you, knuckledragger? Typical useless TeaParty pod person: no ideas, prone to inaction and a coward to boot. If it weren't for running your mouths spewing nonsense, you lot would be totally speechless.
HasinaiMan 4 months ago
A RASPBERRY is all Ann Coulter deserves. She's nothing but a footnote in "the shameful part of American history."
11Catdog 3 years ago
LYDIA IS AWESOME!! sooo funny.
You rule Lydia!
Blink44smannequin 3 years ago
I heard Lydia Cornell had death threats from Ann Coulter fans after Ann Coulter posted her private home number on her website in retaliation for a humorous article Lydia wrote about her. Ann Coulter is a hate monger, and should never be allowed to use hate-speak on the airwaves again. Lydia is a class-act and I imagine she dropped the idea of a book on Coulter because she didn't want anymore threats and harrassment. Coulter is nuts.
kevinkch1111 3 years ago
You heard wrong. This woman sent a professional letter to Ann Coulter portraying herself as a journalist with "readers" and included a presumed business address and phone number. Ann Coulter FAIRLY posted the e-mail sent to her in its full context. Lydia then claimed she "accidentally" put her home number on there in lieu of her business one. It was her own blunder. As if Ann Coulter really had time to search out every idiotic liberal's private information for her readers to harrass.
snorp73 3 years ago 2
snorp73: YOU heard wrong and you are wrong. What Coulter did was despicable. According to MSNBC, Editor & Publisher, "she was contacted and asked to remove the phone number several times but never budged. Once she knew it was private information, she should have taken it down, but she was busy calling for Supreme Court Justice Stevens to "be poisoned" because he was pro-life. Coulter should be in jail for inciting hatred against Americans by using death-wishes and extermination-speak." (quote
11Catdog 3 years ago
Ann Coulter is the most un-Christian example of a self-seeking publicity hound. She'll say anything to get attention. Cornell wrote this in an article: "The lowest was when she made fun of John Edwards' loss of his son. Nothing defines a person more than the death of a child, and Coulter can never know the depth of compassion it takes to become a true human being and citizen of the world."
11Catdog 3 years ago
Uh huh, do you make it regular practice to delete responses? Or did it just get a little too hot for you?
snorp73 3 years ago 2
1.) She didn't make fun of his son's death - tell Lydia to pull her head of out her mall. She made fun of Edwardss constant need to bring it up during the campaign!
Moreover; you know darn well I answered your last comment very well loaded with facts. The fact you have to delete it I think is all we need to know of just how confident you are in your position.
You can't escape facts forever.
snorp73 3 years ago 2
@snorp73 Actually u are wrong. Coulter has done this before. She, the gook twinkie Malkin have posted names and addresses of people htey disagree with on their website. and liberals? u use that abusively. Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin referred to their political thought as liberal. Neo ocnservatives were once liberals as well. they disagreed with the direction liberals were going in and latchd onto the right for political reasons. Liberal meangin progressive is actually a positive term
newjerseydev 1 year ago
@newjerseydev Coulter nor Malkin posted private information out of spite because someone was a liberal. Lydia C. acted like she was a writer with an audience, then turned around and tried to use Coulter to get some attention. Coulter beat her to the punch and spent one tenth of the energy Lydia spent on her.
Malkin did this a couple months ago following an appearance on Hannity to show the HATE MAIL received from people. If they cannot take the heat, keep them out of the kitchen.
snorp73 1 year ago
@snorp73 @snorp73 sorry snorp but u are incorrect. malkin posted the rivate contact details of a Univeristy of california peace orgs website leaders after he criticised her. wiki malkin and ull see it firsthand. silly hateful woman. the fact that u havent heard this is one thing-u watch FoX, but the fact that u deny shows that you dont know whats going on and are ignorant. read a little more than one website before spouting lies
newjerseydev 1 year ago
Ha, I love how you characterize it as simple criticism. I know Malkin and have been reading her forever. She posts all details on e-mails when they sound psychotic. This, you see, goes beyond what you call standard criticism. I have seen her do it, and it's always good to point out who these people are to give Americans a choice on whether or not to do business with people like that. You liberals always try to pick a fight, but when conservatives win, you start crying.
snorp73 1 year ago
@snorp73 First off Snorpette I am not a liberal.Im a former Marine living in europe.But the founding fathers considered themselves liberals.many neo conservatives are former liberals coming from the left..and ur words are foolish. Malkin is a threat. u htink its right to post peoples personal addresses on public websites when u disagree with their actions?this kid was a peace activist and didnt deserve to have his details posted.what happened if someone opened fire on his home?malkin is immoral
newjerseydev 1 year ago
Well depending on what liberal meant in those days. Liberal describes Christianity back then as well when it is compared to Islam and Judaism.
But the founding fathers WERE NOT Obama or Pelosi liberals. I am sorry, but that is so laughable. Can you imagine what the constitutiton would have read like if it were.
I think Malkin and Coulter both had to publish emails received from haters on the left in their full context so their readers know they are factual.
snorp73 1 year ago
@newjerseydev Once again, if liberals so not want to be held accountable of responsible for their words, they shouldn't open their mouths to begin with.
Stop whining and tell them to take a little personal responsibility.
snorp73 1 year ago
@snorp73 I am sure u arent a bad person just misinformed like the majority of god fearing americans. i wont continue this argument. but ur making an error malkin didnt receive an email. wiki Malkin and read about it yourself,. she heard about a kid on campus standing up for peace and she horrifically took his little local school advertsiemnt and placed it onher internaitonal website so that people from all over could get his mobile number. he got death threats and was in police protection,nice
newjerseydev 1 year ago
@snorp73 sorry snorp but u are incorrect. malkin posted the rivate contact details of a Univeristy of california peace orgs website leaders after he criticised her. wiki malkin and ull see it firsthand. silly hateful woman. the fact that u havent heard this is one thing-u watch FoX, but the fact that u deny shows that you dont know whats going on and are ignorant. read a little more than one website before spouting lies
newjerseydev 1 year ago
All Coulter fans are twisted little hate mongers like Ann. Just read snorp73s diatribe.Must suck to be him.LOL
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
oooh this is a hateful comment. it must be deleted at once! lol
wy do liberals ONLY seem to realize that life is not "simon says" when it's their turn to be simon?
snorp73 3 years ago
why*
snorp73 3 years ago
Hard for you to communicate without obscenities? It shows.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Obscenities? Example please.
snorp73 3 years ago
Scroll down to Catdogs explaination for deleting some of your comments. not in this thread ,but previously. 2+2 still=4. Troops home? I believe thats a "NO" for McCain. 99.9% The outcome for us is bankruptcy. Bush cut the feds contribution to utility assistance for the elderly. No fans this year my paper here says. How sad,to an American, but not to your kind. There will be no good outcome. Bush senior was right when he said it would be a "Quagmire" Too bad his boy was an idiot.Shouldda listened
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
First no comment of mine was deleted for the use of obscenity. I'm not sure who he/she was referring to, but it wasn't me. Simply talking to liberals and using facts is way to get them to scream. Next - "troops home" is the stupid question CBS News uses to tell us what Americans think of the war. I'm telling you that if 100% of Americans did not say "yes" to that question. Majority of Americans want them home, BUT do not think Iraq should be left in the condition it's in.
snorp73 3 years ago
And what condition do you want America left in? If you haven't noticed the economy is beginning to tank. I've never met a neo-con that can count, guess I never will. We can't afford to stay in Iraq. Maybe you like Bushs budget deficent, but I'm a little smarter than that.Thanks to all the lies Bush put out America's on a downward spiral.Screw Iraq, the damage is done.Your clueless like the few people that still believe Bush. Just watch the economy. Try arguing with that
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
That's not an answer. It's a generalization. There isn't anything to argue. First and foremost, tax revenue should be spent on national security - not welfare, not lazy people's healthcare and certainly not Global Warming studies. Your ideology is so common that if it were taken seriously, we'd all be speaking German by now. So what, now I suppose you're going to pretend you "support" 300,000 American deaths, capring bombing entire German cities, and defeating evil?
snorp73 3 years ago
Germany declared war on the U.S. so as usual your supposition is ridiculous. Well its clear your not a Christian. Every man for himself and greedy little you first. lol Boy would this country suck if your kind was in charge! Oh wait,they are and things suck. I'm not going to bother your empty neo-con mind with facts, you haven't been able to respond to anything, you just ignore the uncomfortable.So typical. You should try reading, a little history would be a start so you dont sound so foolish.
SGOBEE 3 years ago
That's because you have no facts. What's "greedy" to you is what happens to make America great. People like you need people like Obama to strip the pockets of hard-working ambitious folks to line yours. Wealth re-distribution is a classic sign of communism, it's what they do best and it's what you celebrate. An enemy attacked us in WW2 and one attacked us in 2001. What country was it that attacked us in 2001? None did, it's not ending in Iraq so get used to it.
snorp73 3 years ago
Sorry people like you are on the way out. Wealth redistribution? Dont make me laugh. What do you think is happening now? But you are right about one thing. No country attacked us. Ben ladin did. And Bush can't even find him. So we're in Iraq why? Because of nothing but lies. The stupidity you call your "ideology" will end when the truth comes out. Oh,sorry I make too much to qualify for any programs. I'm just not as self-centered as you,
Thank God
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Wait. Wealth distribution has nothing to do with war. Under Bush, the only economic thing done through legislation are the tax cuts he's proposed. Your arguments prior seem to have led us to believe that you support taxing the rich in order to pay for everyone else. So I assume you don't support that now, right? And this nonsense about Osama is why you will never be able to fill the gap in your mind. Osama is a piece, what about the thousands killed in attacks for 20+ years before 2001?
snorp73 3 years ago
What about the men who planned the JFK plot? How about the Fort Dixx plot? The USS Cole. The 4 attacks during Clinton's administration? The truth is you don't support ANY measure to stop them. No profiling at airports, no Patriot Act, no Guantanamo, no war, no NSA listening to cell calls of terrorists. Your "catch Osama" bull is revealed when the facts stack up against you that ANYTHING Bush could do to find him or stop him - you would be against. Which part of his policy do you support?
snorp73 3 years ago
I LOVE it when Neos in a corner start this line Oh yea, I'm want America to fall, I want my kids to die, I want to welcome the terrorist in with open arms so they can shoot me. My God do you realize how silly your position is. I don't agree with Bush so I want America destroyed?!Bush is an ineffective fool, the best thing our enemies could hope for. I support his wanting to give SeaPort security to some Arabs, remember? LOL. I'm sure you do.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Okay, so here we go again. "Bush is an ineffective fool" (who just happened to keep my ass safe for eight years). You still aren't answering the question. Let's say Bush's only mission was to "catch just Osama" (liberals' belief of "fixing it all"). Would you support the NSA listening to calls to capture him? If he were held at Guantanamo and used for questioning to lead us to his next-in-line folk (oh wait, we got those), would you support water-boarding then? WHAT WILL YOU SUPPORT?
snorp73 3 years ago
Safe from what? You neos are such Cowards it's disgusting. 543 billon dollars and nothing to show for it. I've taken FEMA's course on NBC incident response planning, resource allocation and triage. I understand the realities and you do not. That money could have vastly improved Americas ability to cope with anything they threw at us. Afganistan had to happen, Iraq is all a filthy lie. I support the Constitution and I will bear arms to defend it against all enemies foreign or domestic.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Safe from attacks! If it were not for the Patriot Act or the NSA or catching the terrorists held at Gitmo now, JFK would have gone though, the Brookly Bridge would have been destroyed, etc. But the fact is you don't support what protected us. You can take all the courses you want, but without the policies in place, none of it is effective! You still cannot prove Iraq is a lie, and once it is safe to leave and we have another strong ally there, even the media won't be able to harp anymore.
snorp73 3 years ago
Would you support pro-filing at airports if Bush got a memo that said "bin Laden determined to visit ground zero in the next three months!" Would you support measures enforced by the Patriot Act to catch him? Would you support bombing areas of Afghanistan to guarantee his death? You liberals can't just say "get Osama!" anymore, you have to make your case believable by supporting JUST ONE measure effective in doing so. So tell me, which one do you support?
snorp73 3 years ago
By the way your rant from you "empty liberal mind" is so "typical." You think that was anything more original than what we've heard out of Rosie O'Donnell?
snorp73 3 years ago
You tell me Rush. Love your service record.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
And it seems I've already won. Yet another brilliant "join something to support something" argument. Did you join your local fire department yet? Volunteering for local classrooms to assist teachers? Volunteer for local police work? I'm sure - otherwise you don't really support them. Tell me, why did you save the pinnacle of your brilliance for this portion of the discussion?
snorp73 3 years ago
Funny you would ask, I'm an EMT and I volunteer at an E.R. to keep my continuing education requirements up to date as well as helping. I also teach Red Cross CPR classes.Did you know that rescue breaths will be eliminated when the next update is released? Compressions only in the future. Some of us act on our beliefs. Won? lol Your a prize all right.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
But what about the rest of it? Since I assume you support teachers, I assume you volunteer to help in classrooms? You join everything you support? Winning comes easy when facts and logic are your side. Don't feel too bad.
snorp73 3 years ago
I fail to see what your winning. And what do you help support? Nothing? Just a talker I'm sure Well at least your forced to concede the moral high ground since you do nothing to help Americans.
Go ahead and look up morals so you don't embarass yourself yet again. Feel bad? Hardly. Chatting with you makes me feel pretty good about things. Your a talker and I'm a doer. Again what do you do to justify being in our country? Try to answer if possible
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Assuming you knew what I contributed to or how I paid back (not that being in the 33% tax bracket isn't enough), I've always found it odd that the best people of the world were the ones who were great because people recognized it, not because they have to run around reminding everyone all the time. That isn't to say that liberals have never embellished facts to put a personal touch on a debate of ideas. The facts are on my side - logically, you cannot join everything you support.
snorp73 3 years ago
I was pondering this post and I glanced at your page...WTF!? In a previous life you were in charge of the "Jews for Hitler" party right? Look I'm sorry if what I do makes you feel inadequate,don't ask and I won't bring it up. As for logic I think it saw you coming and ran like hell. You are one deeply self conflicted person. No wonder you defend your position regardless of the facts. What else do you have? Well thanks for keeping the punchline for last.. you are a HOOT.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Can you imagine Mother Teresa running around as the diva of goodwill? If I was inadequate or felt that way, the way I spoke would have exuded that. But the fact YOU had to say it cancels out your claim all once. You can't deny that my theory factually refuted every stupid liberal "you must join something to support something" argument against the war. So when you answer this, it's probably best to remind us again how inadequate you make me feel rather than attempting to answer the point. ;-)
snorp73 3 years ago
BTW, not only did you purposely avoid telling refuting the point about liberals brilliant 3rd grade level "join something to support something argument" I see you have also avoided telling me which policy you would support in capturing Osama bin Laden. Quick patting yourself on the back long enough to type an actual response! :-)
snorp73 3 years ago
All the troops to Afganistan into Pakistan if needed. Is that simple enough? Join something to support something is an American tradition. Pop was VFW, Ma was a prayer circle leader. Where the hell did you grow up, Orphanage? I'm starting to feel sorry for you.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
No...we all have family military members, we all have contributed through work and money...but because you do not actively join any particular cause does not change the idea of having it. So great, the troops are in Afghanistan. Now what? When we capture him, can we kill him? Can we take him to Gitmo and waterboard him? Are we allowed to intercept his phone calls and can we profile him at the airport if he walks in clean-shaven and wearing a Hawaiian shirt? What can we do that's effective?
snorp73 3 years ago
Look up "Capitol Crimes" I support the death penalty .
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Good!
snorp73 3 years ago
What theory is that? Say it straight without the glitter.Your kinda wordy..
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
You're cute..."glitter" is a bad Mariah Carey movie. I explained it very well.
snorp73 3 years ago
No, really, be as concise as you can and eliminate the B.S. about anybody who disagrees is a terrorist. Thats just talking points from Rush. And I'll do the same.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
I was concise and I didn't say anyone was a terrorist. But liberals sure say it in the case of Dick Cheney or George Bush...ahem. I spelled it out and used many words to explain it. I know you can read, we've been chatting for days now.
snorp73 3 years ago
No Bush is a traitor to the constitution, from an American perspective.Think of it as a position statement. No purpose except to explain what you think Bush has accomplished. I'll have a rebuttal and you can re-rebuttal and then see where we stand. But I'm off duty at 5 a.m.so research fast.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
I sleep. Bush has accomplished the beginning of a strong foothold in the Middle East. He was the only leader (aside from reagan) in the last 20 years who stood up to terrorists and faced it head-on. If Carter would not given them the first strong foothold in 1979, this wouldn't be happening. If liberals really believe that Obama or Clinton will go in an rip troops out of Iraq, they are really fooling themselves. It's almost as funny as them supporting gay marriage or true "equality."
snorp73 3 years ago
Lets not debate the past,no point The now is whats important, and as important is Iraqi attitudes towards the U.S. The U.N. compilied several opinion polls US,UK,independent and heres a short list. The invasion-49% right, 50% wrong. Confidence in US forces-20%good, 79% bad.When should US withdraw-38%-now, 35% when iraq is secure. A total of 15% say Occupation is good/somewhat 85% say bad/somewhat The foothold dosen't exist,according to Iraqs.Maybe at the point of a M4. So this is an Occupation
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Right, just as effective as CBS calling up 1,000 alleged voters. If you asked 1,000 Germans during WW2 after watching two towns over be destroyed by one bombing in our pursuit of Hitler, what do you think they would have said? The material reports of the generals, troops, and families of troops along with the fact that violence is massively down, we are winning, and civility is being restored directly contradicts the "polls". We've been hearing "danger danger" all along the way. No Difference
snorp73 3 years ago
Sigh..This is a compilation of many different polls. A rebuttal should contain facts in opposition not "what ifs" about WW2.Hell the poll was trending upwards I figured you'd pick up on that, if you weren't so dismissive of things you don't agree with. The troops aren't Iraqis and their families are over here so they don't know do they?.Oh well I prefer facts and you prefer opinions. So much for intelligent debate.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
These aren't facts...these are OPINION POLLS. And I know many military wives and family members that fully support the cause. Whatever you say, don't take away the pride of everything they have accomplished thus far. Polls contain people who also know it's possible to get the wrong answer, who has the media and celebrities telling them how evil Bush is and how he "lied" to us. Intelligent debate requires that you dig deeper and that's why I used WW2 as example.
snorp73 3 years ago
So, let's ask this "poll question." Obviously 100% of Americans want the troops home. But when should they come home? How would you answer that poll question? And why would you answer it they you would?
snorp73 3 years ago
the way you would*
snorp73 3 years ago
Your turn but only try to discredit my points as I did yours. We can discuss Lord Reagan later.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
snorp73:
You do realize that reagan sold arms to Iran AFTER the Iran hostage crisis That's trading with the enemy .So please ENLIGHTEN me,WHAT DID REAGAN DO TO "STAND UP TO TERRORISTS?
O
radicalsam 3 years ago 2
do you remember libya in 1986? The United States of America sent several F111-F/B's and dropped several bombs on qadaffi's tents targeting his ass for his government's role in the downing of American chartered passenger liners. qadaffi got the point that we could scratch his ass from the face of the earth!
suntzu1985 2 years ago
@suntzu1985 and reagan backed up the taliban, mujahadeen and embryonic al quaeda. whats your fucking point!!!
newjerseydev 1 year ago
Not only that, at the very same time Reagan was selling arms to Iran, he was selling WMD to Iraq, and those two countries were at war with one another. That sent such a wonderful message to the Middle East with the U.S. arming both sides in a conflict so they could kill each other.
vieetverite 2 years ago
"The pedestal you've put yourself on and since I'm breaking it down now it's going to collapse and be gone! - Fergie 2007
snorp73 3 years ago
My you are soooo deep.LOL
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Nah, I'm just a lot of fun! :-) Or as I do believe you put it, "a HOOT."
snorp73 3 years ago
Really? 5 days ago you were asking catdog why he deleted questions "or did it get a little to hot for you" I know this will be hard for you, but don't lie.
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Don't exaggerate. He didn't imply to me that I was obscene. He must have been referring to someone else, I'm not an obscene person nor do I have to be to be effective in dealing with the common liberal.
snorp73 3 years ago
Why do Neo cons make amusing little comments that really have no bearing on anything rational? Are you bitter because only 25%(CBS poll) of Americans still believe the lies? You should read Catdogs rebuttal.But for me Ann is a name caller and a soul-less harpy. No wonder you admire her. LOL
ElGrandinquisitor 3 years ago
Okay...I responded to a stupid post of yours talking about how Ann Coulter fans are "hate mongers." Now I know that in a liberal's world, this is "originality" in the battleground of youtube comments. My comment simply was living up to the integrity of yours. Moving along - CBS News just published an article written by the Nation for God Sake. Misleading questions like "do you want the troops home?" (of course 100% would say yes) but for some reason they always disregard Iraq's outcome.
snorp73 3 years ago
Only Lydia Cornell could bring humor from a horrible subject such as Ann Coulter.
Lydia Cornell rocks!!!
BrandySJones 3 years ago
Lydia Cornell is so funny yet still the most beautiful girl in America today.
sellecacollins 3 years ago 2
Lydia Cornell is sexy and funny as she shows why she is and always will be America's favorite Bombshell.
sellecacollins 3 years ago
Funny and sexy look at Lydia Cornell showing her beauty and sharing her phenominal humor.
LarrySelleca 3 years ago 2